Dude... easy there. I know what you're saying. I was excited and spoke incorrectly... If you read the earlier posts, you would see I already know we didn't demonstrate overunity. The truth is, we were getting overunity with this device, but the video doesn't demonstrate it properly. You don't have to be so rude about it.
That's a great question. It depends on how high the spikes are of each coil, and how many coils, and how many amp hours the battery has. Obvious, the more coils, the faster the charge will fill up the battery. More amp hours - will last longer, but take longer also to charge. I think with just one coil, with a standard car battery (assuming it is not dead / sulfated) my setup would take around 24-48 hours. I'd love to hear more feedback from others on this as well
so where is the instruction how to build this Setup? i am sick of showing demonstrations.....imhotep did god with his manual how to build..but there is no overunity right?
Hi there, Yes we did achieve overunity. I apologize, in this video, for now properly demonstrating over unity, but with the calculation of voltage and current going in and what we got out (in addition to the movement of the wheel) there is definite overunity.
@MosheDan9 That's great, thanks for the reply. I'm experimenting on bedini stuff but I was skeptical about its output which prevented me from completing it.
These things are fun to play with, but you can forget about overunity ... try running something substantial with it and you will see that it simply won't work...
A magnet passing over a coil will induce a voltage in that coil.
In the photo history of Australia there are many photos of people running High Frequency radios using voltage generated by someone pedalling a bicycle which was rigged up as a generator...
All the other strange activity here, with misquotes and the two guys talking just adds to confusion.....
Wind Generators do what these people appear to be trying to prove.... Not sure what all the fuss is about?
Bedini is a conman. You are impressed that he got a patent? Hell, Valone, LaViolette and Aspden (aka notorious pseudoscientists) have all been patent examiners. That is an excellent example of putting a fox in charge of the hen-coop!
The negative on the primary battery go’s to the inner 20 gauge wire on the coil which also go’s to the emitter on the transistor and the inner 24 gauge wire from the coil go’s to the collator on the transistor then the neon bulb is connected to the emitter and collator does it matter which way I put the neon bulb? And is there any problems you see in this hookup? I noticed when I put a drill bit in the coil it shoots it out and my core is made of drill bits. help!
From what we can tell, all is set up well, except for the diode is upside down. Also I can’t see the transistor if it is connected properly. Send me a private email and i will send you some links to a good tutorial where you cannot go wrong if the diode fix doesn't work.
The potentiometer is connected to a 24 gauge outside coil wire. My 1N4007 diode is connected to the positive on the secondary battery. Then the outside 20 gauge wire runs to negative on the secondary battery and on the positive on the primary battery.
Nice video! Hi I have been trying to get the bedini motor to work, but the wheel just comes to a stop. My setup is 1N4001 diode is connected on the emitter to the base on the transistor. Then the base is connected to a 470 resister. Then resister is connected to the potentiometer.
I'VE READ PAGES OF THIS VIDEO'S COMMENT'S. Enough already. The question is not how many volts is produced, it's the watts, or D.C., amps. For the novice here, if the volts represent the water pressure in a pipe, the amps represent the SIZE of the pipe used. Obviously the larger the pipe, the more flow. If anybody here on UT justifies their machine in volts, without telling you the amps, then tell them to "take a leap". They are not only deceiving you, they are deceiving THEMSELVES.
Ufos22 - please see my comments just just below to Kyle Carrington.
here it is again - Hi Kyle, you're right. i know i misspoke in this video. I apologize. i honestly was blown away by how powerfully uplifting and energizing it felt and i lost my scientific mind...
i really am not trying to deceive anyone. i misspoke in my excitement. i know it is wrong. i understand the error. thanks for your concern.
One thing is for certain: if you think that you'll see overunity in the form of the classical power equation -> you won't. This video is confusing... the voltage (as stated) is not indicative of "over unity". That's just a product of a coil. Any coil can increase voltage. One must calculate the energy used to charge a battery (drawn from battery one) and measure that against depleting the second battery. More proof could be ascertained by closing the loop, but that's not simple...
Hi Kyle, you're right. i know i misspoke in this video. I apologize. i honestly was blown away by how powerfully uplifting and energizing it felt and i lost my scientific mind...
@MosheDan9 I hear you on that one. I am baffled too, and no matter where you search, you will not find a definitive proven explanation of what is going on here. For the benefit of newcomer's though, the Bedini circuit is NOT overunity, however (like a heat pump) is has potential for COP>1. Coefficient of performance, when the mechanical work + the "obtained" amp-hours (measured in their final work) of the charged batteries is likely > 1. See cheniere org for more explanation
I do believe that the Bedini school girl circuit CAN be overunity. I didn't demonstrate this adequately in this video, but... if you calculate the # of watts going into the system, and you compare to the mechanical energy of the wheel spinning plus the # of watts you can get charging a whole BANK of batteries, you certainly have COP >1+++. You are aware that you can charge many many batteries, right? Unlike conventional electricity, which would divide the current.
@MosheDan9 I agree, and I don't mean to be a nob, but.. that's not "overunity", really.. that's a higher co-efficient of performance, just like solar, heat pumps, a sail boat. If our physics could explain and quantize field energy, or energy from the vacuum, or aether or whatever you want to call it, it'd likely all work out mathematically and not defy The Law of Conservation of Mass and Energy. It would, however break the second Law of Thermodynamics, and that law is already in need of revamp.
Hi Kyle. you're not being a nob, just expressing your opinion. that's fine. but my opinion is pretty much that COP >1 and Overunity are one and same, where we are responsible for inputting the energy into the system. so obviously not solar, not wind - these are not overunity, and i wouldn't even place them in the COP >1 category.
@MosheDan9 I hear what you mean. It is, however where a lot of people get confused. One thing is for sure, the patent office knows where they stand. Don't talk about overunity with them, that's for sure. Keep everything in terms of COP and Back EMF, you start mentioning overunity, free energy, perpetual motion or anything of the like and your screwed. Have you actually read Bedinis patents? Exactly what what I'm talkin bout!
Hi Kyle. you're not being a nob, just expressing your opinion. that's fine. but my opinion is pretty much that COP >1 and Overunity are one and same, where we are responsible for inputting the energy into the system. so obviously not solar, not wind - these are not overunity, and i wouldn't even place them in the COP >1 category.
I myself am building and testing the circuit too, and the real question in my mind is will these batteries do the same work, with a "bedini charge" that they would, if charged normally. If they will, how many batteries can you charge simultaneously - can you perceive higher gains by charging two? No battery responds well to a "fast charge" and maybe slow charging 2, instead, will show higher gain.
@elcanom "So you need to prove total power in vs" ~ The only way to do this, is to accurately measure the amount of kinetic energy in the wheel (or vibrations of the transistors) + the inputed energy to the cell. The cell, my friend, is not being charged with current. You have to go outside the box of normal thought. Normally, we charge the batteries with current. Here, we dead stop current and use energy from the vacuum to spike high voltage into a batteries, and it charges itself.
Go test to see for yourself instead of waiting for answers everyone. The answers given to you are sometime never true and if you do not seek you will never know.
Free energy can change the world!But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Find the real deal, a free energy device at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Free yourself!
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
Why store? That's so hard to get visible. Let any over unity be used to do work. Like dragging a weight across a surface, or better: lifting a weight over a vertical distance. If it can't be used, it's not useful.
I am excited by the results we have been given also, however, without seeing the total input vs total output, you're not learning anything about how much power in vs. how much power out. To do this you need to find out how many volts at how many amps are going in, and how many volts plus how many amps are coming out. You can be getting virtually 2k volts on the radiant spikes, however if it is only at 1 millionth of an amp, that doesn't mean more power. So you need to prove total power in vs
think its only millitry that can get them as only see it on utube not a site how many amps you need also use a inverter (requires 15 volts and makes 220volts ac
try using 400 + volt batrys instead of loads of little ones and also look for the output amp for them batrys and see if that helps let me know your findings
a 9V battery is just 6 AAA batteries... why not just use a bunch of old AA batteries? the bedini setup will charge all of the old dead AA batteries anyways...
i am not the original poster of this vid but love it and the comments it is real it is not magic and its not taxable so dont patent it but use it and then re post ur new comments
good vid an good comments but this can be set to make more and more rps or w.e and has resistors put in place to keep it at a set rate thus you can infact tune to make alot more power than you all relise lol this can power alot more than you think lol
i just added the video to my list as this fascinates me aswell and sort of have wireing diagrams yer and some instructions of what items you may need aslo, tbh i found it all on google looking for above names as in video title and also put in seperatly wireing diagrams along with the circuit title as in the video name. i am looking into how to make 240 volts
thanks Jamie. I'd love how to make 240 volts with some chunky amperage too. I am getting spikes of quite high voltage - the peaks must be around 600-700 volts, but the amperage is quite low. It could be condensed to higher amps, but not that much. i am interested in vamping it up for greater energy output without needing a thousand secondary batteries.
look into a transformer from a micro-wave they turn 240 into high voltage in reverse it will take your high voltage and give you 240 maybe (dont blow yourself up though!)
....... Overunity?????? you do realize voltage is half the equation right. yet you make no mention of the total ampree. 110v house hold can easily be converted 10kv through a hand held size disruptive discharge coil. It does not mean the wattage output has changed it just means the ampree has been converted to volts. Units should be messured in total of wattage (volt x ampee = wattage). Summery you have made no proof of overunity.
yes, i realize i didn't verify the overunity business properly in the video. I am aware. Thanks. But... this is a device that does yield overunity. for instance, one 12V battery can run the system, turn the wheel, and charge a bank of batteries (as far as I know, as many as you have) at the same voltage. that's overunity. there's lots of other vids out there of the bedini system demonstrating this.
@MosheDan9 I agree. High voltage spikes though low in ampere can charge large banks of batteries which in turn give you the voltage and ampere you need when used. I would say it is over unity just not direct. Batteries are the problem here. They aren't efficient enough to store all the energy produced. Super capacitors are a lot better at storing but discharge it all in a burst. I'd say the focus now should be in developing better storage.
@MosheDan9 If you are referring to Zenn's EESter EESU (Ultra Capacitor) Then yes this would be the ideal storage unit if it ever gets to market. There are a lot of skeptics to the claims made by the inventors. EESter have yet to publicly show working samples though they have made a lot of claims which are very impressive if true. Their constant delays in releasing this technology has me thinking we may have to wait longer for such technology. Lets just say I'll believe it when I finely see it.
On further note Maxwell Technologies BOOSTCAP Ultracapacitors look promising. I have yet to get my hands on one. The model of interest to me thus far is the one that is used in some UPS systems. Capable of charging like a normal cap and discharging for several minutes. Nothing compared to the claims of EESter's EESU Ultracapacitor but readily available.
@dracoame not breaking the laws of physics but rather utilizing a well known phenomenon. A collapsing electro magnetic field induces a high voltage spike in the coil. When designing circuits rather then utilizing this phenomenon we are taught to avoid or discharge it by grounding. The laws of physics were not written by nature but by man. If it seems to be breaking the laws of physics it merely means the books need to be rewritten and we have learned a bit more of the workings of this universe.
You need to show current and voltage readings from the input and output to get input power and out put power then you can see if you have increased in power...that is over unity...you can increase your voltage or current but your power will stay the same...one will decrease while another will increase...but power stays the same.
I was watching your video on the solid state bedini circuit and would like to know you can build me one for a price? If so, how much voltage can you have the circuit put out?
yes i know. you're right. we actually have that in the Bedini setup. We have overunity. There is an increase in amps created along with voltage. so we're good. I just did not record that on the video. Was more excited by the amazing feeling of radiant energy in the room.
This IS an overunity device, but it is NOT perpetual motion, as something will always wear out or break, and it does NOT defy the Law of conservation of energy, as the energy going IN includes the energy from the primary battery AND the Radiant energy that nature provides for free. Beardon and Bedini explain this pretty clearly in "Energy From The Vacuum."
So let me get this straight, according to your line of thinking something is a hoax until there is a math model to express it? Correct? So then it follows logically that gravity was a hoax until Newton came up with the math for it? Then explain the Roman aquaducts, or every mill wheel that ever ground a grain of grist...all gravity powered devices. Don't ASSUME something can't exist just because you can't buy it off the shelf at Wallmart. That's not the scientific process. Experiment and observe
So, you really believe the device is producing more electricity than it consumes? Fine: just plug the device into itself. Ah, you didn't think of that, did you? Sheeeish.
I am by no means an expert in electricity. my friend who built the Bedini setup is much more adept. Yes, we did think of this, what you mention here. But i didn't mention it in the video. So?? But what's with all the rude asses in this field who think they know it all? That is the question I'd like answered. We got overunity down now, so what about all the big ego heads?
There are two possibilities for proving over-unity:
1. Demonstrate and measure more power output (going into a load) than measured power input.
2. Demonstrate and measure more total battery energy at the end of the experiment as compared to the measured total battery energy at the beginning of the experiment.
I have never seen a clip address these fundamental issues.
Perhaps you will give it a shot. To repeat: Spikes from a coil mean nothing.
Put your money where your considerable mouth is, Dude. Build an SSG for yourself and see if it works. It's not like you can't find the plans anywhere. OR just assume it can't possibly work( because you know better) and keep paying the electric company for the rest of your life. Sheeeish indeed.
you will find the that true charging of a battery requires power not just voltage spikes. the voltage spikes are probably giving a hi volt reading on the battery being charged but no real power available. just keep switching batteries you will see you are depleting the power out of both batteries.
check out a video on the net called "Energy from the vacuum part 2: the Bedini motor". Here it's all explained very well, all along with several demonstrations of the batteries charge and discharge.
i have noticed the same thing. The Bedini motor isn't really a motor its an oscillator that pulses a transformer.
Notice what happens initially when u turn on a DC supply... u get an initial burst of voltage, a spike. Then the current catches up and destroys the diapole. Current is what we dont want. Current = Heat = waste energy. By pulsing a coil we are creating radiant spikes for a split second and extracting energy from the vacuum.
well your right in a conventional sense... I have noticed with my own experiments that there is little to no output current. Now u would say there is no power then, but in fact it can charge another battery much faster than the run battery.
We are capturing Radiant energy. which works without current! strange yes I know.
Tesla talked about this strange energy 100 years ago.
Watch my videos for interview with Bedini himself talking about Radiant energy
well then if its overunity simple connect the battery your using in parallel to the battery your charging and the entire thing should run for very long time. But if it dont then its not overunity do you agree?? i bet it will only run until both batterys go dead no longer.
yes. you're right. I made a mistake. Got caught up in the moment and wasn't thinking. Thing is, this setup does have overunity - even with the input primary voltage and current draw compared to the secondary, we have overunity, plus, there is the continual motion of the wheel.
Complete rubbish. Give voltage and amperage, not just voltage. You made a voltage to voltage converter, that's it.
So, you have an oscillating circuit with a coil and you declare this to be "radiant energy" because of a spiking waveform. "The transistor becomes solid state"...LOL. As an engineer, can you see how I'm not taking you seriously?
BTW, if the voltage is to high to measure, try using a voltage divider circuit. We're talking electronics 101 here.
Back EMF is the extra energy being created each time the oscillating magnetic field collapses. What goes up must come down, and the collapse is the free energy.
Its so incredibly interesting to here that you easly can make a solid that version of this! Is it really that easy? And will it also produce energy and in the same ammounts as the spinning one?
it was quite easy for us. you need a higher value potentiometer to trigger the oscillations, without the wheel. i use several in series, including 1 MOhm... which is not that much needed.
So you don't even need the wheel, and the magnets?
Just enough resistance and it will begin to oscillate by it self....
I have some knowledge about the prinsiple about this motor, and if I'm not wrong it is in the battery that the extra energy is generated, but with the help of the strong impusle which is created by the collapsing field in the coil?
I then really wonder, (if thats the case of course) why you really need thoese magnets then, if its only for the timing and the mechanical energy
Can you show current consumption? Voltage means nothing without current consumption. You can construct a DC to DC converter and a higher voltage from a lower one. If you had current/voltage input and current/voltage output you can show that the input power (watts) is less than the output power (watts). How about it?
the energy collected, "radiant" cannot be measured in current. It is different than conventional electric current, but if u run tests you will see energy being collected that cant be explained easily.
have you tried doing the voltage measurements after turning off the machine, disconnecting the batteries from the circuit and waiting 10-15 minutes? That's how I usually do it, 'cause the voltage readings change quite a bit after the SG is stopped.
how about COP test using Joule in/out values like it is described in the Bedini Monopole Group experiment PDF on the Monopole 3 yahoo group message board?
Please, I did not mean to be rude, or in any other way, But learn the proper way to examine how to find and expose an over unity situation.
Power input must be less then power output. For any over unity situation.
Please realise that power if in (phase) is a relation ship of the product of applied voltage and current.
When you deal with ac effects. this then becomes a complex situation.
Please take it one step at a time.
You will then find the answers you are looking for.
CMAenergy 1 month ago
You guys better go back to school and learn what over unit (power ) out put is all about.
You have proved absolutely nothing!
This is erroneous results that go no where and prove nothing!
You can baffle those who don't know but a wise person knows how falsely you are trying to baffle others.
One dummy speaks while the other does the same.
Power P = V times A - everything being in phase.
You also have input and out put and compare them appropriately.
Your presentation Proves nothing.
CMAenergy 1 month ago
@CMAenergy
Dude... easy there. I know what you're saying. I was excited and spoke incorrectly... If you read the earlier posts, you would see I already know we didn't demonstrate overunity. The truth is, we were getting overunity with this device, but the video doesn't demonstrate it properly. You don't have to be so rude about it.
MosheDan9 1 month ago
This project seems to be a good one....
If you want to get the plans for building the Magnetic Generator?
Just goto Google, search for "Top Magnetic Generator" ...
Click the First Result (Skip the Advertisements)
Jmaes8989 1 month ago 5
does anyone take into account the amount of time needed to charge the battery? And how long the battery would run after it's charged?
ActiveStorage 2 months ago in playlist MOTIONLESS ELECTRIC GENERATORS
@ActiveStorage
That's a great question. It depends on how high the spikes are of each coil, and how many coils, and how many amp hours the battery has. Obvious, the more coils, the faster the charge will fill up the battery. More amp hours - will last longer, but take longer also to charge. I think with just one coil, with a standard car battery (assuming it is not dead / sulfated) my setup would take around 24-48 hours. I'd love to hear more feedback from others on this as well
MosheDan9 2 months ago
so where is the instruction how to build this Setup? i am sick of showing demonstrations.....imhotep did god with his manual how to build..but there is no overunity right?
WrongBirthday 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
- If you want to get the OverUnity Magnetic-Generator Plans...
- Just search Google for "Best Magnetic Generator Review"...
- Click the First result (Skip the Advertisements)...
hermzchrist 3 months ago
what about a diagram on your or your friends as you are saying in the project. I know about the bedeni..thxs.
Mrinfoone 3 months ago
@Mrinfoone
hey my friend, a diagram of what, exactly? What are you seeking?
MosheDan9 3 months ago
can you do full step by step video on making this new bedini circuit?
Mrinfoone 3 months ago
@Mrinfoone
no... but if you do some searches, you'll find what you're looking for.
MosheDan9 3 months ago
I know this video is old now, did you ever really achieve overunity with any of your Bedini type experiments ?
gconol 5 months ago
@gconol
Hi there, Yes we did achieve overunity. I apologize, in this video, for now properly demonstrating over unity, but with the calculation of voltage and current going in and what we got out (in addition to the movement of the wheel) there is definite overunity.
MosheDan9 5 months ago
Comment removed
gconol 5 months ago
@MosheDan9 That's great, thanks for the reply. I'm experimenting on bedini stuff but I was skeptical about its output which prevented me from completing it.
gconol 5 months ago
@gconol
It's real. Good luck with your experimenting. The trick is to tune the circuit with the potentiometer. Must find the sweet spot for overunity.
MosheDan9 5 months ago
These things are fun to play with, but you can forget about overunity ... try running something substantial with it and you will see that it simply won't work...
MichaelHGoebel 6 months ago
A magnet passing over a coil will induce a voltage in that coil.
In the photo history of Australia there are many photos of people running High Frequency radios using voltage generated by someone pedalling a bicycle which was rigged up as a generator...
All the other strange activity here, with misquotes and the two guys talking just adds to confusion.....
Wind Generators do what these people appear to be trying to prove.... Not sure what all the fuss is about?
ucdailoi 7 months ago
Bedini is a conman. You are impressed that he got a patent? Hell, Valone, LaViolette and Aspden (aka notorious pseudoscientists) have all been patent examiners. That is an excellent example of putting a fox in charge of the hen-coop!
flowerbower 7 months ago
The negative on the primary battery go’s to the inner 20 gauge wire on the coil which also go’s to the emitter on the transistor and the inner 24 gauge wire from the coil go’s to the collator on the transistor then the neon bulb is connected to the emitter and collator does it matter which way I put the neon bulb? And is there any problems you see in this hookup? I noticed when I put a drill bit in the coil it shoots it out and my core is made of drill bits. help!
333kgb 10 months ago
@333kgb
From what we can tell, all is set up well, except for the diode is upside down. Also I can’t see the transistor if it is connected properly. Send me a private email and i will send you some links to a good tutorial where you cannot go wrong if the diode fix doesn't work.
MosheDan9 10 months ago
The potentiometer is connected to a 24 gauge outside coil wire. My 1N4007 diode is connected to the positive on the secondary battery. Then the outside 20 gauge wire runs to negative on the secondary battery and on the positive on the primary battery.
333kgb 10 months ago
Nice video! Hi I have been trying to get the bedini motor to work, but the wheel just comes to a stop. My setup is 1N4001 diode is connected on the emitter to the base on the transistor. Then the base is connected to a 470 resister. Then resister is connected to the potentiometer.
333kgb 10 months ago
I'VE READ PAGES OF THIS VIDEO'S COMMENT'S. Enough already. The question is not how many volts is produced, it's the watts, or D.C., amps. For the novice here, if the volts represent the water pressure in a pipe, the amps represent the SIZE of the pipe used. Obviously the larger the pipe, the more flow. If anybody here on UT justifies their machine in volts, without telling you the amps, then tell them to "take a leap". They are not only deceiving you, they are deceiving THEMSELVES.
ufos22 11 months ago
@ufos22
Ufos22 - please see my comments just just below to Kyle Carrington.
here it is again - Hi Kyle, you're right. i know i misspoke in this video. I apologize. i honestly was blown away by how powerfully uplifting and energizing it felt and i lost my scientific mind...
i really am not trying to deceive anyone. i misspoke in my excitement. i know it is wrong. i understand the error. thanks for your concern.
MosheDan9 11 months ago
One thing is for certain: if you think that you'll see overunity in the form of the classical power equation -> you won't. This video is confusing... the voltage (as stated) is not indicative of "over unity". That's just a product of a coil. Any coil can increase voltage. One must calculate the energy used to charge a battery (drawn from battery one) and measure that against depleting the second battery. More proof could be ascertained by closing the loop, but that's not simple...
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
@KyleCarrington
Hi Kyle, you're right. i know i misspoke in this video. I apologize. i honestly was blown away by how powerfully uplifting and energizing it felt and i lost my scientific mind...
MosheDan9 1 year ago
@MosheDan9 I hear you on that one. I am baffled too, and no matter where you search, you will not find a definitive proven explanation of what is going on here. For the benefit of newcomer's though, the Bedini circuit is NOT overunity, however (like a heat pump) is has potential for COP>1. Coefficient of performance, when the mechanical work + the "obtained" amp-hours (measured in their final work) of the charged batteries is likely > 1. See cheniere org for more explanation
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
@KyleCarrington
Hi Kyle,
I do believe that the Bedini school girl circuit CAN be overunity. I didn't demonstrate this adequately in this video, but... if you calculate the # of watts going into the system, and you compare to the mechanical energy of the wheel spinning plus the # of watts you can get charging a whole BANK of batteries, you certainly have COP >1+++. You are aware that you can charge many many batteries, right? Unlike conventional electricity, which would divide the current.
MosheDan9 1 year ago
@MosheDan9 I agree, and I don't mean to be a nob, but.. that's not "overunity", really.. that's a higher co-efficient of performance, just like solar, heat pumps, a sail boat. If our physics could explain and quantize field energy, or energy from the vacuum, or aether or whatever you want to call it, it'd likely all work out mathematically and not defy The Law of Conservation of Mass and Energy. It would, however break the second Law of Thermodynamics, and that law is already in need of revamp.
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
@KyleCarrington
Hi Kyle. you're not being a nob, just expressing your opinion. that's fine. but my opinion is pretty much that COP >1 and Overunity are one and same, where we are responsible for inputting the energy into the system. so obviously not solar, not wind - these are not overunity, and i wouldn't even place them in the COP >1 category.
MosheDan9 1 year ago
@MosheDan9 I hear what you mean. It is, however where a lot of people get confused. One thing is for sure, the patent office knows where they stand. Don't talk about overunity with them, that's for sure. Keep everything in terms of COP and Back EMF, you start mentioning overunity, free energy, perpetual motion or anything of the like and your screwed. Have you actually read Bedinis patents? Exactly what what I'm talkin bout!
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
@KyleCarrington
Hi Kyle. you're not being a nob, just expressing your opinion. that's fine. but my opinion is pretty much that COP >1 and Overunity are one and same, where we are responsible for inputting the energy into the system. so obviously not solar, not wind - these are not overunity, and i wouldn't even place them in the COP >1 category.
MosheDan9 1 year ago
I myself am building and testing the circuit too, and the real question in my mind is will these batteries do the same work, with a "bedini charge" that they would, if charged normally. If they will, how many batteries can you charge simultaneously - can you perceive higher gains by charging two? No battery responds well to a "fast charge" and maybe slow charging 2, instead, will show higher gain.
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
@elcanom "So you need to prove total power in vs" ~ The only way to do this, is to accurately measure the amount of kinetic energy in the wheel (or vibrations of the transistors) + the inputed energy to the cell. The cell, my friend, is not being charged with current. You have to go outside the box of normal thought. Normally, we charge the batteries with current. Here, we dead stop current and use energy from the vacuum to spike high voltage into a batteries, and it charges itself.
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
ITS NOT AMPERAGE! ITS CURRENT
nikulp68 1 year ago
thanks for sharing.
Go test to see for yourself instead of waiting for answers everyone. The answers given to you are sometime never true and if you do not seek you will never know.
shadowless09 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy can change the world!But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Find the real deal, a free energy device at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Free yourself!
checksummedchest 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
gordinflon232425 1 year ago
So let's save the world. What are you waitting?
vitanunis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these
information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the
revolution!
hungarylnnjsd 1 year ago
Why store? That's so hard to get visible. Let any over unity be used to do work. Like dragging a weight across a surface, or better: lifting a weight over a vertical distance. If it can't be used, it's not useful.
Cloxxki 2 years ago
BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, what happened to the school girl! Nobody knows....
mipmipmipmipmip 2 years ago
I am excited by the results we have been given also, however, without seeing the total input vs total output, you're not learning anything about how much power in vs. how much power out. To do this you need to find out how many volts at how many amps are going in, and how many volts plus how many amps are coming out. You can be getting virtually 2k volts on the radiant spikes, however if it is only at 1 millionth of an amp, that doesn't mean more power. So you need to prove total power in vs
Elcanom 2 years ago
Go back to grade seven physics and listen this time.
larryllix 2 years ago
You are not producing any energy...period!
You are converting one level of voltage to another. This is only a force.
Energy requires voltage, current and time. You have no current.
This is called counter EMF and is useful in voltage step-up circuits like you have designed.
larryllix 2 years ago
u cam get a ;of more get rid of all feris metal excpt iron core
guyzzemf 2 years ago
think its only millitry that can get them as only see it on utube not a site how many amps you need also use a inverter (requires 15 volts and makes 220volts ac
Jamieduk999 2 years ago
try using 400 + volt batrys instead of loads of little ones and also look for the output amp for them batrys and see if that helps let me know your findings
Jamieduk999 2 years ago
good idea. do you have a link to a site that displays or has info about such large batteries?
MosheDan9 2 years ago
a 9V battery is just 6 AAA batteries... why not just use a bunch of old AA batteries? the bedini setup will charge all of the old dead AA batteries anyways...
Paulisfalseprophet 2 years ago
i am not the original poster of this vid but love it and the comments it is real it is not magic and its not taxable so dont patent it but use it and then re post ur new comments
Jamieduk999 2 years ago
good vid an good comments but this can be set to make more and more rps or w.e and has resistors put in place to keep it at a set rate thus you can infact tune to make alot more power than you all relise lol this can power alot more than you think lol
Jamieduk999 2 years ago
cool!!! very cool... thanks for sharing Jamie. Can you elaborate? Do you have plans, or a video to demonstrate what you're talking about?
MosheDan9 2 years ago
i just added the video to my list as this fascinates me aswell and sort of have wireing diagrams yer and some instructions of what items you may need aslo, tbh i found it all on google looking for above names as in video title and also put in seperatly wireing diagrams along with the circuit title as in the video name. i am looking into how to make 240 volts
Jamieduk999 2 years ago
thanks Jamie. I'd love how to make 240 volts with some chunky amperage too. I am getting spikes of quite high voltage - the peaks must be around 600-700 volts, but the amperage is quite low. It could be condensed to higher amps, but not that much. i am interested in vamping it up for greater energy output without needing a thousand secondary batteries.
MosheDan9 2 years ago
look into a transformer from a micro-wave they turn 240 into high voltage in reverse it will take your high voltage and give you 240 maybe (dont blow yourself up though!)
iswindowsavirus 2 years ago
....... Overunity?????? you do realize voltage is half the equation right. yet you make no mention of the total ampree. 110v house hold can easily be converted 10kv through a hand held size disruptive discharge coil. It does not mean the wattage output has changed it just means the ampree has been converted to volts. Units should be messured in total of wattage (volt x ampee = wattage). Summery you have made no proof of overunity.
Lokivoid 2 years ago
yes, i realize i didn't verify the overunity business properly in the video. I am aware. Thanks. But... this is a device that does yield overunity. for instance, one 12V battery can run the system, turn the wheel, and charge a bank of batteries (as far as I know, as many as you have) at the same voltage. that's overunity. there's lots of other vids out there of the bedini system demonstrating this.
MosheDan9 2 years ago
@MosheDan9 I agree. High voltage spikes though low in ampere can charge large banks of batteries which in turn give you the voltage and ampere you need when used. I would say it is over unity just not direct. Batteries are the problem here. They aren't efficient enough to store all the energy produced. Super capacitors are a lot better at storing but discharge it all in a burst. I'd say the focus now should be in developing better storage.
ZincFold 2 years ago
thank you for this great info. i appreciate it a lot.
and i agree. we need better storage.
super capacitors? like the ones that Zen are making in montreal that discharge slowly like a battery, but charge fast like a cap....
MosheDan9 2 years ago
@MosheDan9 If you are referring to Zenn's EESter EESU (Ultra Capacitor) Then yes this would be the ideal storage unit if it ever gets to market. There are a lot of skeptics to the claims made by the inventors. EESter have yet to publicly show working samples though they have made a lot of claims which are very impressive if true. Their constant delays in releasing this technology has me thinking we may have to wait longer for such technology. Lets just say I'll believe it when I finely see it.
ZincFold 2 years ago
On further note Maxwell Technologies BOOSTCAP Ultracapacitors look promising. I have yet to get my hands on one. The model of interest to me thus far is the one that is used in some UPS systems. Capable of charging like a normal cap and discharging for several minutes. Nothing compared to the claims of EESter's EESU Ultracapacitor but readily available.
ZincFold 2 years ago
you can measure but don't hook up the scope directly. Rather use an inductive probe ... OR get a voltmeter that can measure HIGH-VOLTAGE AC.
morpher44 2 years ago
thanks. I appreciate it.
MosheDan9 2 years ago
wow, you broke the laws of physics! you should be rich!
it's a neat oscillator but that's all it is
dracoame 2 years ago
@dracoame not breaking the laws of physics but rather utilizing a well known phenomenon. A collapsing electro magnetic field induces a high voltage spike in the coil. When designing circuits rather then utilizing this phenomenon we are taught to avoid or discharge it by grounding. The laws of physics were not written by nature but by man. If it seems to be breaking the laws of physics it merely means the books need to be rewritten and we have learned a bit more of the workings of this universe.
ZincFold 2 years ago
You need to show current and voltage readings from the input and output to get input power and out put power then you can see if you have increased in power...that is over unity...you can increase your voltage or current but your power will stay the same...one will decrease while another will increase...but power stays the same.
michaelscote 2 years ago
You have pulsed waveforms. Your meters read average voltage and average current. But average power does NOT equal average voltage * average current.
You are not over unity, you are just making bad measurements.
sjh7132 3 years ago
GO MY MOJO (cell) WORKIN'
dieselscience 3 years ago
Hello,
I was watching your video on the solid state bedini circuit and would like to know you can build me one for a price? If so, how much voltage can you have the circuit put out?
sblanco1978 3 years ago
Increase in voltage IS NOT overunity.
Increase in Joules is.
Increase in watts is.
ie. Energy = Power
Power = Watts = Joules
Free Voltage is nothing unless you make it do some electrical work.
Free Voltage is like being given a free erection and having nowhere to put it.
fu2ah 3 years ago
yes i know. you're right. we actually have that in the Bedini setup. We have overunity. There is an increase in amps created along with voltage. so we're good. I just did not record that on the video. Was more excited by the amazing feeling of radiant energy in the room.
MosheDan9 3 years ago
ECOMAFIA Your mommy is calling. Nobody gives a FUCK what you think idiot. WE are CREATING HISTORY WITH RADIANT, So go fuck yourself little man!
FORCETHETRUTH 3 years ago
i'm sorry to say, your output IS less than your input.
You have a working bedini. ok, so what you going to do with it?
How about adding generator coils? and then you will be at the the same point as the rest of us.
This is not overunity. You have not shown us enough evidence that it is overunity.
comwarrior69 3 years ago
Just two cents more.
Add a rectifier, 4 diodes, cheap. Put in a simple filter, a condenser would do.
Connect the output instead of the battery.
How long would that run after initial crank ?
I mean WITHOUT power source ? *smile*
These are more or less "self synchronous stepper motors".
A bit complex to calculate as most steppers are. But in no way "over energy" devices.
Battery discharged by short pulses can last quite some misleading many innocents.
No overunity, sorry to disappoint.
ecomafia 3 years ago
This IS an overunity device, but it is NOT perpetual motion, as something will always wear out or break, and it does NOT defy the Law of conservation of energy, as the energy going IN includes the energy from the primary battery AND the Radiant energy that nature provides for free. Beardon and Bedini explain this pretty clearly in "Energy From The Vacuum."
rickmontembeault 3 years ago
Radiant energy that nature provides for free..
Hey, energy from vacuum ??
Can you lay down some math model to the community ?
Nope. It's a misinterpretation of basic transient processors in reactive circuits.
Don't make a hoax out of it, it'll be one too many.
ecomafia 3 years ago
So let me get this straight, according to your line of thinking something is a hoax until there is a math model to express it? Correct? So then it follows logically that gravity was a hoax until Newton came up with the math for it? Then explain the Roman aquaducts, or every mill wheel that ever ground a grain of grist...all gravity powered devices. Don't ASSUME something can't exist just because you can't buy it off the shelf at Wallmart. That's not the scientific process. Experiment and observe
rickmontembeault 3 years ago 3
Hi there, and thanks for your typing.
Gravity has a field model, sure thing, what makes me nervous is how to modulate it. That's not mastered yet...
Roman aquaducts can and WERE calculated, be it sort of simplistic.
Raise an antenna and you can collect tiny induced currents, there's a math model beneath.
NOW an electric motor one can quite well compute.
All "perpetum" devices fail when one uses TRMS meters (not walmart ones) and battery runs out.
Thermodynamics stand.
Nice day read u soon
ecomafia 3 years ago
So, you really believe the device is producing more electricity than it consumes? Fine: just plug the device into itself. Ah, you didn't think of that, did you? Sheeeish.
VolunteerMinisters 3 years ago
I am by no means an expert in electricity. my friend who built the Bedini setup is much more adept. Yes, we did think of this, what you mention here. But i didn't mention it in the video. So?? But what's with all the rude asses in this field who think they know it all? That is the question I'd like answered. We got overunity down now, so what about all the big ego heads?
MosheDan9 3 years ago
There are two possibilities for proving over-unity:
1. Demonstrate and measure more power output (going into a load) than measured power input.
2. Demonstrate and measure more total battery energy at the end of the experiment as compared to the measured total battery energy at the beginning of the experiment.
I have never seen a clip address these fundamental issues.
Perhaps you will give it a shot. To repeat: Spikes from a coil mean nothing.
Drevtoobe 3 years ago
Put your money where your considerable mouth is, Dude. Build an SSG for yourself and see if it works. It's not like you can't find the plans anywhere. OR just assume it can't possibly work( because you know better) and keep paying the electric company for the rest of your life. Sheeeish indeed.
rickmontembeault 3 years ago
You guys are deluding yourselves. It is obvious that you are beginners.
The spikes are nothing. The coil can discharge with a high voltage spike. It means nothing.
Drevtoobe 3 years ago
"You guys are deluding yourselves. It is obvious that you are beginners."
That's putting it mildly. It's obvious they don't know the fundamentals of physics. They can get the same results without the "motor" part.
VolunteerMinisters 3 years ago
this is incomprehensible...
LuMagazine 3 years ago
you will find the that true charging of a battery requires power not just voltage spikes. the voltage spikes are probably giving a hi volt reading on the battery being charged but no real power available. just keep switching batteries you will see you are depleting the power out of both batteries.
tonytvtech 3 years ago
check out a video on the net called "Energy from the vacuum part 2: the Bedini motor". Here it's all explained very well, all along with several demonstrations of the batteries charge and discharge.
samoht1977 3 years ago
i have noticed the same thing. The Bedini motor isn't really a motor its an oscillator that pulses a transformer.
Notice what happens initially when u turn on a DC supply... u get an initial burst of voltage, a spike. Then the current catches up and destroys the diapole. Current is what we dont want. Current = Heat = waste energy. By pulsing a coil we are creating radiant spikes for a split second and extracting energy from the vacuum.
Check out my vids for more on Radiant energy
dodoshlodo 3 years ago
no no no overunity is not comparing voltage in and voltage out... its power in and power out... come one basics
tonytvtech 3 years ago
well your right in a conventional sense... I have noticed with my own experiments that there is little to no output current. Now u would say there is no power then, but in fact it can charge another battery much faster than the run battery.
We are capturing Radiant energy. which works without current! strange yes I know.
Tesla talked about this strange energy 100 years ago.
Watch my videos for interview with Bedini himself talking about Radiant energy
dodoshlodo 3 years ago
well then if its overunity simple connect the battery your using in parallel to the battery your charging and the entire thing should run for very long time. But if it dont then its not overunity do you agree?? i bet it will only run until both batterys go dead no longer.
tonytvtech 3 years ago
yes. you're right. I made a mistake. Got caught up in the moment and wasn't thinking. Thing is, this setup does have overunity - even with the input primary voltage and current draw compared to the secondary, we have overunity, plus, there is the continual motion of the wheel.
MosheDan9 3 years ago
nice video, cheers
dodoshlodo 3 years ago
Your grade is F.
You are talking absolute mince.
fizzguts 3 years ago
Complete rubbish. Give voltage and amperage, not just voltage. You made a voltage to voltage converter, that's it.
So, you have an oscillating circuit with a coil and you declare this to be "radiant energy" because of a spiking waveform. "The transistor becomes solid state"...LOL. As an engineer, can you see how I'm not taking you seriously?
BTW, if the voltage is to high to measure, try using a voltage divider circuit. We're talking electronics 101 here.
Agrajag042 3 years ago
then why can these machines charge batteries faster than the power battery consumes energy?
dodoshlodo 3 years ago
Back EMF is the extra energy being created each time the oscillating magnetic field collapses. What goes up must come down, and the collapse is the free energy.
sirmikeydotcom 3 years ago
I love this and I'm gonna build one soon!!
Its so incredibly interesting to here that you easly can make a solid that version of this! Is it really that easy? And will it also produce energy and in the same ammounts as the spinning one?
Thanks in advance and for a great video!
Nabo00o 3 years ago
it was quite easy for us. you need a higher value potentiometer to trigger the oscillations, without the wheel. i use several in series, including 1 MOhm... which is not that much needed.
MosheDan9 3 years ago
So you don't even need the wheel, and the magnets?
Just enough resistance and it will begin to oscillate by it self....
I have some knowledge about the prinsiple about this motor, and if I'm not wrong it is in the battery that the extra energy is generated, but with the help of the strong impusle which is created by the collapsing field in the coil?
I then really wonder, (if thats the case of course) why you really need thoese magnets then, if its only for the timing and the mechanical energy
Nabo00o 3 years ago
Can you show current consumption? Voltage means nothing without current consumption. You can construct a DC to DC converter and a higher voltage from a lower one. If you had current/voltage input and current/voltage output you can show that the input power (watts) is less than the output power (watts). How about it?
cfavreau 3 years ago
You don't get it, do you? If they did that, everyone would see that it is not an over-unity device at all.
boxpilot 3 years ago
the energy collected, "radiant" cannot be measured in current. It is different than conventional electric current, but if u run tests you will see energy being collected that cant be explained easily.
coreyb84 3 years ago
hi
have you tried doing the voltage measurements after turning off the machine, disconnecting the batteries from the circuit and waiting 10-15 minutes? That's how I usually do it, 'cause the voltage readings change quite a bit after the SG is stopped.
how about COP test using Joule in/out values like it is described in the Bedini Monopole Group experiment PDF on the Monopole 3 yahoo group message board?
bergweg 3 years ago
Hummmmm I have an inverter that runs on 12v but I get 240v out but it's not Over Unity is it. But looks good keep up the good work.
theDaftman 3 years ago 3
Holly crap. cool!
+5
Lucidtomr 3 years ago