Why don't you disclose your relationship with Norway's statoil company which does business with the Mullahs in Iran? Which at one time was controlled by Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. You are a traitor and a liar. You are not an expert on Iran. The Iranian people hate your guts.
Technically, it is the inherent right of Iran to develop its industry and work towards securing its energy resources. It is not under any obligation to negociate with anyone about its rights.
According to IAEA Iran is in full complince with its treaty obligations. In addition to that Iran did suspend all its nuclear activity from 2003 to 2006, during which the IAEA had full and unannounced access to all Iranian nuclear facilities. Normally, that should have ended all the questions.
"Technically, it is the inherent right of Iran to develop its industry and work towards securing its energy resources. It is not under any obligation to negociate with anyone about its rights. "
Nor are we under any obligation to allow their continued existence if they continue to pursue apocalyptic weaponry. To hell with negotiations. We should do like we did to Germany and Japan.
We are not in a position to regulate the existence of others. There is no parallel with Germany and Japan. Iran is not threatening anyone; we are, and that is not in our interest.
We may have done things to Germany and Japan, but the way our economy is taking it from them hands down and and in serious pain, suggests we have made mistakes along the way.
actually you're the ignoramus not to mention a complete moron. OUR intelligence has found that they arent developing nukes and their grade of plutonium is nowhere near weapons grade. iran has complied with our inspections, although the president and some of the media try and make them sound like a threat to us because they want a war. go eat more paint chips k? k
It is encouraging to see a posting from the NewAmericaFoundation in view of the massive anti-iranian campaign in media.
Between US military bases popping up on Iran's eastern borders almost on a quarterly basis and the presence of an envoy in a meeting, I think Iranians are more sensitive to the first. The US diplomatic gesture and the actions on the ground are contradictiory. The diplomatic gesture is certainly not perceived as something serious.
We should bomb Iran until they stop their "fuel cycle" then invade and force them to accept a constitution on par with America's, the way we did to Germany and Japan.
A modest proposal as the basis for a new nuclear non-proliferation policy: if Iran wants nuclear weapons, we should give them two; one delivered to Qom and the other to Tehran.
After, we can ask if any other rogue state would like one.
I enjoyed this talk, but the point is being missed. Bush and company don't want to negotiate with Iran at any level. Worst even still "they don't know how to negotiate". Look up the definition of "Dry Drunk" in AA literature. Bush is an alcoholic who never got treatment for his illness, thus denial is his most strongest virtue. And besides, Cheney is the one who has been running the government for the last 8 years. Bush is just the "front" man.
Leverett,
Why don't you disclose your relationship with Norway's statoil company which does business with the Mullahs in Iran? Which at one time was controlled by Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. You are a traitor and a liar. You are not an expert on Iran. The Iranian people hate your guts.
TheJkrow 6 months ago
Flynt is that a Mullahs Cum on your lips?
Persiancreed1 6 months ago
Flynt Leverette STOP sucking Mullahs Cocks !!!!!!
Persiancreed1 6 months ago
WITHOUT THE ZIONISTS LOVERS
AMERICAN AND IRAN WOULD BE FRIENDS!
nice0071 1 year ago
Technically, it is the inherent right of Iran to develop its industry and work towards securing its energy resources. It is not under any obligation to negociate with anyone about its rights.
According to IAEA Iran is in full complince with its treaty obligations. In addition to that Iran did suspend all its nuclear activity from 2003 to 2006, during which the IAEA had full and unannounced access to all Iranian nuclear facilities. Normally, that should have ended all the questions.
jeffwny6 3 years ago 2
"Technically, it is the inherent right of Iran to develop its industry and work towards securing its energy resources. It is not under any obligation to negociate with anyone about its rights. "
Nor are we under any obligation to allow their continued existence if they continue to pursue apocalyptic weaponry. To hell with negotiations. We should do like we did to Germany and Japan.
MrCropper 3 years ago
We are not in a position to regulate the existence of others. There is no parallel with Germany and Japan. Iran is not threatening anyone; we are, and that is not in our interest.
We may have done things to Germany and Japan, but the way our economy is taking it from them hands down and and in serious pain, suggests we have made mistakes along the way.
jeffwny6 3 years ago
"Iran is not threatening anyone"
You,sir, are a complete ignoramus.
And that bit about the economy - well, you're obviously too brainwashed to hear anything rational...
MrCropper 3 years ago
actually you're the ignoramus not to mention a complete moron. OUR intelligence has found that they arent developing nukes and their grade of plutonium is nowhere near weapons grade. iran has complied with our inspections, although the president and some of the media try and make them sound like a threat to us because they want a war. go eat more paint chips k? k
marpoq 3 years ago
"although the president and some of the media try and make them sound like a threat to us because they want a war. "
Why would that make them a threat?!?!
MrCropper 3 years ago
You really love war. Don't you?
cheddyrod 3 years ago
This type of hand wringing and evasion of the bottom line is certainly a foundation for a new America.
grantsinmypants2 3 years ago
It is encouraging to see a posting from the NewAmericaFoundation in view of the massive anti-iranian campaign in media.
Between US military bases popping up on Iran's eastern borders almost on a quarterly basis and the presence of an envoy in a meeting, I think Iranians are more sensitive to the first. The US diplomatic gesture and the actions on the ground are contradictiory. The diplomatic gesture is certainly not perceived as something serious.
IranBaastaan 3 years ago 2
We should bomb Iran until they stop their "fuel cycle" then invade and force them to accept a constitution on par with America's, the way we did to Germany and Japan.
Do it like we did in '45!!!
MrCropper 3 years ago
A modest proposal as the basis for a new nuclear non-proliferation policy: if Iran wants nuclear weapons, we should give them two; one delivered to Qom and the other to Tehran.
After, we can ask if any other rogue state would like one.
jwoodswce 3 years ago
I enjoyed this talk, but the point is being missed. Bush and company don't want to negotiate with Iran at any level. Worst even still "they don't know how to negotiate". Look up the definition of "Dry Drunk" in AA literature. Bush is an alcoholic who never got treatment for his illness, thus denial is his most strongest virtue. And besides, Cheney is the one who has been running the government for the last 8 years. Bush is just the "front" man.
Katwagner55 3 years ago 6