claymores are way to heavy for a none armor fights. Have to remember, large and heavy swords were used to go through armor. Armor made the individual slow so you did not have to be concerned with speed. With that said, personally, I would love to face a claymore in a real battle.
Nothing is better than Polish Hussar sabre. Look on this samples below, any other white weapon is not so quick as sabre and fore sure any sword even Japanese katana. See yourself how quick polish hussar sabre is. Any Japanese fencer wouldn’t have a chance with master of polish hussar sabre.
/watch?v=oo0z_R59P8M
/watch?v=LzHYqehsAYA
/watch?v=pHP4pSQvbxk
This are fencer from Polish Sabre Society in Warsaw
This is good to get technique down but what really works is being fully armored up and swinging 45 lbs of hickory wrapped in a layer of duct tape. See if you can handle that kind of pain.
@DragonSniper7 LOL no, they arent heavy, you clowns only think of the braveheart "claymore" which was never used anyway, it is tactically a waste of time unless you are made like a fridge. Claymore means bigsword in scottish language, but braveheart has introduced the word claymore as a loanword for bastard/great sword
What's with holding the katana like it is an umbrella? Get it off your shoulder, away from your head, and your elbows out more. If you suddenly want the sword on the left side, your own head is in the way. A stance should either be centered or, if it's a right guard/left guard of some sort, the sword should have ample room to maneuver. If you start out with the blade next to your face and your arms tucked in like that your options suddenly become much more limited.
I love how some people think that a guy sparring with a claymore against a guy with a katana now has anything to do with a highlander and samurai centuries ago. Every weapon has weaknesses, it has a lot to do with the guy holding it though.
hmm...both of you need more rhythm into the weapon style. there's no connection between the user and the sword nor effort to give a trust worthy swing especially on the claymore. where i come from, we use Machetes, each with they're own characteristics and sizes(Home forged like any sword). when we spar, we of course have the actual weapon sealed in the sheath tightly. im not sure about you guys, but when we practice, we synchronize ourselves with the sword's movement in both attack and defense
I was fairly surprised how well the katana stood up in this pairing. The katana wielder actually managed to slip past the claymore's reach and strike clean.
@SteelCrash Yes, a samurai can deflect a knight's full swing. Don't flatter yourself on the strength. Deflecting is mainly the technique of redirecting something's movement. This was evident in the age of Robin Hood, the era of the yeomens. They defeated strong and heavily armored knights with nimble and agile feats, usually with nothing more than a buckler and short sword, and a lot of parrying and tumbling.
If you had said block however, that would be a totally different case...
@LCAratari c'mon now.. They design these weapons so that you KNOW when you've been hit.. They don't cut pool noodles into shape and start swinging them..
Now, I personally prefer wooden weapons with no padding, but that's just for cheaper weapons.. Plus they last a long time.
thinking about how if that was a real fight back when there were actual sword fights. these people must have had a very low life expectancy. the way it seemed so random how they seemed to hit each other one mistake and your dead lol.
Resting a sword on your shoulder like the claymore dude is doing is ... well... stupid. It leaves only a few options for an opening strike(Diagonally down, straight down, and a curve to the side.) and leaves you wide open to a strike from the side the claymore isn't resting on. If the katana dude had dodged to the side then struck at waist level he would have won every time, while the claymore guy tries to recover.
Yes, for marching in formation, or long distance running, most of the time you would hold it in front of you though. More play and the weight would still work for you.
the whole point of a two handed sword is that you use the off hand for leverage, letting you strong hand be the pivot.
And I would love to see where you heard about it being standard. (Being quite serious here, did you read it in a book or something?)
I am not, by any means, a sword master, it just was weird seeing that.
Which video? the search I did on German Long Sword Techniques turned up this "=Y3DhjFUOG6Y" which had some interesting movements, including several disarms and a couple drops, but they never shouldered their weapons except to get them out of the way.
(By the way, did you put a (Dot)com in there? Youtube is finicky about URLs. It eats them now.)
A long sword is not suppose to be heavy what so ever. The weight of them was suppose to be about the same as a Katana.
/watch?v=K9UrXT6PXu0
Yes, long swords are longer then Katans, but they have just about the same weight. Why, the long sword is straight, this helps in length, the curve suffers in length...
Ahh, yes for between attack? Maybe. I personally wouldn't do it because it blocks a lot of options to from me.(And leaves a very real option of cutting my own arm/head off.) That aside, what I was referring to in my first post was using the shouldered claymore as a starting position.
But it shouldn't be much heavier--they were lighter than most of the two-handers in Europe including the lowlands of Scotland... and actually, the baskethilted broadswords were the things called claymores.
This isn't a very realistic sparring session is it? As far as I know katanas aren't made for blocking blows, especially not from a claymore.
MormonJezus 6 months ago
@MormonJezus That's kind of the point ;-)
Different weapons, with different skills, and enjoying the challenge.
gregbreinholt 6 months ago
Why am I getting a Devil May Cry feel.
Lordoofious 6 months ago
THATS LOOK FUN. CONGRATS! ... JUST A TIP FOR THE KATANA FIGHTER U SHOULD LOOK FOR MARUBASHI AND KIRIKAESHI NICE VID!
darkfrenchy 7 months ago
The guy with the claymore doesn't use enough of is weight shift
purplebob2 8 months ago
Singapore looks nice
Vindictus1000 9 months ago
You guys have a club for this? I'd love to join.
kn0ckingIN 9 months ago
@kn0ckingIN Yes, see Jacks profile, search YouTube for user/jackchn
gregbreinholt 9 months ago
@gregbreinholt Sweet thx.
kn0ckingIN 9 months ago
Katana have a lot of disadvantages against claymore.
1. It's shorter. (it's 2-h weapon against 2-h weapon...)
2.It's thinner. (lower in term of durability)
3.It's lighter. (lower in term of power)
3.It has only one edge.
MariusThePaladin 10 months ago
You're not supposed to block with your body.. Just saying.
Yorthan 10 months ago
claymores are way to heavy for a none armor fights. Have to remember, large and heavy swords were used to go through armor. Armor made the individual slow so you did not have to be concerned with speed. With that said, personally, I would love to face a claymore in a real battle.
anointedsword 10 months ago
Nothing is better than Polish Hussar sabre. Look on this samples below, any other white weapon is not so quick as sabre and fore sure any sword even Japanese katana. See yourself how quick polish hussar sabre is. Any Japanese fencer wouldn’t have a chance with master of polish hussar sabre.
/watch?v=oo0z_R59P8M
/watch?v=LzHYqehsAYA
/watch?v=pHP4pSQvbxk
This are fencer from Polish Sabre Society in Warsaw
GregorMar 11 months ago
I'm assuming the dude with the "katana" has never actually studied how to use one, or even kendou, for that matter...
WiggaMachiavelli 11 months ago
this is in Moscow, am I right?
VengeanceIV 1 year ago
@VengeanceIV Sorry no, its Singapore.
gregbreinholt 10 months ago
@gregbreinholt aw, Ik a park in Moscow that looks just like that w/the buildings behind it lol
VengeanceIV 9 months ago
This is good to get technique down but what really works is being fully armored up and swinging 45 lbs of hickory wrapped in a layer of duct tape. See if you can handle that kind of pain.
LordIkaruga 1 year ago
claymores were one of the strongest swords, but VERY heavy. Only a few people could actuallty weild claymores properly....
DragonSniper7 1 year ago
@DragonSniper7 LOL no, they arent heavy, you clowns only think of the braveheart "claymore" which was never used anyway, it is tactically a waste of time unless you are made like a fridge. Claymore means bigsword in scottish language, but braveheart has introduced the word claymore as a loanword for bastard/great sword
Pawnbroker00 1 year ago
claymore won?
goliathlup1 1 year ago
What's with holding the katana like it is an umbrella? Get it off your shoulder, away from your head, and your elbows out more. If you suddenly want the sword on the left side, your own head is in the way. A stance should either be centered or, if it's a right guard/left guard of some sort, the sword should have ample room to maneuver. If you start out with the blade next to your face and your arms tucked in like that your options suddenly become much more limited.
leadbone1 1 year ago
why the guy with the claymore uses that ridiculous stance with the sword on his shoulder?
Zodiamaster 1 year ago
@Zodiamaster That's how you wield a claymore.
kn0ckingIN 9 months ago
I love how some people think that a guy sparring with a claymore against a guy with a katana now has anything to do with a highlander and samurai centuries ago. Every weapon has weaknesses, it has a lot to do with the guy holding it though.
NSOmega2 1 year ago 6
hmm...both of you need more rhythm into the weapon style. there's no connection between the user and the sword nor effort to give a trust worthy swing especially on the claymore. where i come from, we use Machetes, each with they're own characteristics and sizes(Home forged like any sword). when we spar, we of course have the actual weapon sealed in the sheath tightly. im not sure about you guys, but when we practice, we synchronize ourselves with the sword's movement in both attack and defense
TheGarcia350 1 year ago
at 2:25 - 2:29 was really cool. (=
BloodxMixture 1 year ago
it also seemed like u got more hits on the katana guy
AlbertChyn 1 year ago
great vid where did you learn that style with the two handed?
AlbertChyn 1 year ago
I was fairly surprised how well the katana stood up in this pairing. The katana wielder actually managed to slip past the claymore's reach and strike clean.
Jukkaimaru 1 year ago
hmmm guy with the katana doesn't seem to know how to parry a hit very well
allhailfoamy1 1 year ago
omg do you thing samurais were strong enough to deflect full swing from a knight yea right
SteelCrash 1 year ago
@SteelCrash they dodge it =D and slice ur balls open
rickyjangatang1 1 year ago
@SteelCrash Yes, a samurai can deflect a knight's full swing. Don't flatter yourself on the strength. Deflecting is mainly the technique of redirecting something's movement. This was evident in the age of Robin Hood, the era of the yeomens. They defeated strong and heavily armored knights with nimble and agile feats, usually with nothing more than a buckler and short sword, and a lot of parrying and tumbling.
If you had said block however, that would be a totally different case...
benderboyboy 1 year ago
claymore ftw
kokulink 1 year ago
i think clay more its thicker heavier stronger faster
kokulink 1 year ago
i think clay more its thicker heavier stronger faster haha =]
kokulink 1 year ago
This looks like SO much fun! I'd love to try this! I've been training with a claymore for many years now, this looks like it'd be an absolute blast!
genesisSOC 1 year ago
How are these padded, and what kind of a core do these have? Also, how are the cross-guards built, as well as the point and the pommel? =)
DiabolusIgnis 1 year ago
there is no power in the swings... i hate when larper fight like this...
have u fear to get "hurt" by a fucking latex sword?? :D
LCAratari 1 year ago
@LCAratari
These are RSW weapons, not latex; metal core, and then padded.
Since you seem to have some macho shit to prove, yes they can hurt when struck.
gregbreinholt 1 year ago 9
@gregbreinholt yea that makes sence, i didn't see the swords bow
gormitiguy1 1 year ago
@LCAratari c'mon now.. They design these weapons so that you KNOW when you've been hit.. They don't cut pool noodles into shape and start swinging them..
Now, I personally prefer wooden weapons with no padding, but that's just for cheaper weapons.. Plus they last a long time.
SilverwingMagic 7 months ago
@LCAratari : There's a kind of a big difference between larping, boffer fighting, and fencing that you should look into
Halofreakanoid 6 months ago
thinking about how if that was a real fight back when there were actual sword fights. these people must have had a very low life expectancy. the way it seemed so random how they seemed to hit each other one mistake and your dead lol.
froobcakes 2 years ago
i think the same things sometimes, kind of makes you wonder if those "great warriors" were actually that great
Yip1991 2 years ago
Resting a sword on your shoulder like the claymore dude is doing is ... well... stupid. It leaves only a few options for an opening strike(Diagonally down, straight down, and a curve to the side.) and leaves you wide open to a strike from the side the claymore isn't resting on. If the katana dude had dodged to the side then struck at waist level he would have won every time, while the claymore guy tries to recover.
zebrin 2 years ago
I don't mean to sound dismissive, but this is one of the 'standard' stances for use with a long sword... especially a long heavy sword.
The weight of the weapon means that raising from lower stances is very slow.
gregbreinholt 2 years ago
Yes, for marching in formation, or long distance running, most of the time you would hold it in front of you though. More play and the weight would still work for you.
the whole point of a two handed sword is that you use the off hand for leverage, letting you strong hand be the pivot.
And I would love to see where you heard about it being standard. (Being quite serious here, did you read it in a book or something?)
I am not, by any means, a sword master, it just was weird seeing that.
zebrin 2 years ago
Good comments.
Look at this video for some German Long Sword Techniques, around 30 seconds point, or 49 second point, etc,etc.
gregbreinholt 2 years ago
Which video? the search I did on German Long Sword Techniques turned up this "=Y3DhjFUOG6Y" which had some interesting movements, including several disarms and a couple drops, but they never shouldered their weapons except to get them out of the way.
(By the way, did you put a (Dot)com in there? Youtube is finicky about URLs. It eats them now.)
zebrin 2 years ago
Yes, It ate the link. Sorry.
It was the one you mentioned... look at time times I mentioned above, or from 1:26.
There is shouldering between attacks.
I think this is a natural movement to make with the heavier weapons, in-between attacks.
gregbreinholt 2 years ago
A long sword is not suppose to be heavy what so ever. The weight of them was suppose to be about the same as a Katana.
/watch?v=K9UrXT6PXu0
Yes, long swords are longer then Katans, but they have just about the same weight. Why, the long sword is straight, this helps in length, the curve suffers in length...
255Knights 2 years ago
I would agree about European long swords swords (bastard swords, long swords, etc) in general.
The weapon I'm using IS heavier than the Katana, and other long European swords.
It is modeled after a heavy Claymore.
gregbreinholt 2 years ago
Ahh, yes for between attack? Maybe. I personally wouldn't do it because it blocks a lot of options to from me.(And leaves a very real option of cutting my own arm/head off.) That aside, what I was referring to in my first post was using the shouldered claymore as a starting position.
zebrin 2 years ago
But it shouldn't be much heavier--they were lighter than most of the two-handers in Europe including the lowlands of Scotland... and actually, the baskethilted broadswords were the things called claymores.
Semiomniscient 2 years ago
Claymore rulaaazz !! :)
Abazin89 2 years ago
There can only be one!
comexland 2 years ago
the guy with the claymore looks a little clumsy,
fedorwelikala 2 years ago