Makes me all melancholy. Apart from his forehand,I've never seen anyone hit anny shot more beautifully than Edberg. I was never a fan of anyone like I was a fan of Edberg.
I think Edberg would have done fine against Federer. Agassi was the ultimate nightmare for serve and volleyers, yet Edberg's record was fine against Agassi until he was about to retire. 95 edberg was very very far off from his fine form. Besides Federer's record against top notch serve and volleyer, especially likes of Rafter, is not so good. I do not think Federer's slice return would be much of a threat for Edberg.
@quiet1234 i think mirka is his lover for the time being...you may have to take a number if the marriage goes sour.
edberg is a wonderful player on grass but i'm not sure he would have handled fed's speed of shot, devastating angles and superior serve. edberg had difficulty with agassi and andre is federer-lite. bad match up for the old swede.
Meanwhile wide frame racket came along, which helped baseliners and returner too much. Back when likes of edberg played, off-centered shots were punished. These days, they make winners off mis-hit shots from the baseline. Volleyers are technicians that force mishit shots before putting them away. These days, it is tough to do that. Overall, no more greater serve and vollyers. Of course, racket companies make huge sales off these sticks on steroids, so they are fine with it.
of course absolutely fucking brilliant but u forget one major thing. Wide frames werent as deadly as the new strings, even in the old frames these new strings give a shit load of control thats why shots why the worst hit shots still stay in "guys can take cave men swings at the ball"-- Roddick. they get away with too much, its one of the biggest reasons for federers dominance, He has always just put the ball back in to play and waited for errors when he gets outplayed
well it is a huge mess now. Ultimately what they tried was to stop big-serve wonders, which I agree they were making games really boring to watch. So they slowed the ball and court. But they realize that it does not really make much difference. What is the difference between 150 and 120 mph serve at T's in real matches? Not much.
RF R Hi, it doesn't make sense what they're trying to do. I mean they make the rackets more powerful, yet they try to slow the game down with bigger balls. Wouldn't it make more sense to stop
Watching Edberg play here is like poetry in motion. Such a beautiful and artistic style of tennis that you just dont see any more. Amazing stuff from my favourite player of all time.
great video - love Edberg soooo much. He is kinda like how I see all serve and volleyers - essentially a Jedi Knight who insists on using a one handed backhand and volleys. Anyone can use two hands and sit at the back of the court, it takes a Jedi to handle this kind of pressure play like he does.
Watching him makes me wonder why more people on and off the tour dont employ serve and volley tactics more often. it's just lethal.
its because they dont know how to, they are trained specifically for back court play, if a good serve volleyer comes along such as rafter, edberg etc they would wipe the floor with the majority of players out there atm.
No they cant technology is against them, it is just too phyiscally demanding, serve volley tennis is destructive on the body and even worse when serve volleyers have to play like endurance atheltes thanks to technology and change in balls and courts. guys stay back and they do half the work they used to.
serve and volley is long term easier on the body it is easier once you get better at it, the reason no one is serve volley right noa is cuz 10 years ago everyone decided to start playing from the baseline
This has been flagged as spam show
How refreshing to watch Edberg in contrast to all the baseline bashing they call tennis today.
davced1 4 months ago
Comment removed
davced1 4 months ago
guess this is also his best in a grandslam after the 1992 US open. 96 French with Chang comes close
ladcameo 4 months ago
Nadal & Djokovic would have NO CHANCE against Edberg.
His volleys are just WOW - out of this world.
I`ve never seen anybody volleying at this level -ever!!!
Even Sampras wasn´t that good at the net...
HorstMariaSeitz 4 months ago
horrible!! you can't take Edberg out of the net!!! he is like a wall!!
SL9SH 6 months ago
Muster was a living nightmare to opponents. But never to Edberg.
gyozop 8 months ago
He has to be the best volleyer in the game. ever! Fantastic stuff.
Stormsearcher75 8 months ago
@Stormsearcher75 TRUE.
MrMagic002 6 months ago
Muster looks like Bradley Cooper !!!
Lasking9441 8 months ago
nadal = improved muster
roger = improved edberg (on the baseline because how the fuck can you improve edberg's net game?)
P96uhu 9 months ago 2
ya hez my favourite sportsman of all time, slightly ahead of Sachin Tendulkar and Liverpool Football Club.... Cheers Stefan..
ladcameo 11 months ago
Surprising result considering Muster had a solid back court game.
I would love to see a Nadal-Edberg match with modern equipment on the 90's grass.
Ignozi 11 months ago
He plays so elegant tennis!!!
Stier19812002 1 year ago
his approach shots are amazing - don't see that in tennis these days
JillAnderson 1 year ago
You know that you are old when you remember seeing this match live!!
Edu2503 1 year ago
Makes me all melancholy. Apart from his forehand,I've never seen anyone hit anny shot more beautifully than Edberg. I was never a fan of anyone like I was a fan of Edberg.
Federerfan22 1 year ago
didnt muster win the french open in 1995?
jayfey77 1 year ago
I think Edberg would have done fine against Federer. Agassi was the ultimate nightmare for serve and volleyers, yet Edberg's record was fine against Agassi until he was about to retire. 95 edberg was very very far off from his fine form. Besides Federer's record against top notch serve and volleyer, especially likes of Rafter, is not so good. I do not think Federer's slice return would be much of a threat for Edberg.
nocode61 1 year ago
I love this video!:) Noboby could play with more class og dignity than Edberg!:)
bordtennis11 1 year ago
Truly a lost art.
Raindogs111 1 year ago
Muster didn´t know how to play against service volley players.
tlonsinkie 1 year ago
Muster was always easy for Edberg, beat him 10 times, never lost.
bengtmartin 1 year ago
Edberg´s volleys were more elegant than both Federer´s and Sampras´, I think. His low catch at 5:46 is pretty amazing.
bengtmartin 1 year ago 2
If Federer is the King, Edberg is definitely the Angel.
ClausvonBulow 1 year ago
Edberg was great.
Stier19812002 1 year ago
Wonderful tennis from Edberg.
krosero 1 year ago
stefan's masterclass at te net.............
pablotjob 2 years ago
i think edberg would have taken nadal apart on a hard court. devastating serve and volley game.
sharpasaneraser 2 years ago
woulda taken ur lover federer apart too, aggressive players always have, especially great players. He woulda taken him apart on grass
quiet1234 2 years ago 2
@quiet1234 i think mirka is his lover for the time being...you may have to take a number if the marriage goes sour.
edberg is a wonderful player on grass but i'm not sure he would have handled fed's speed of shot, devastating angles and superior serve. edberg had difficulty with agassi and andre is federer-lite. bad match up for the old swede.
sharpasaneraser 2 years ago
Edberg's serve motion was the most perfect motion for the serve and volley game.
It allowed him to be right at half of the way to the net when the opponent was responding to the serve! Never get tired of seeing it!
fmvgomes 2 years ago
Meanwhile wide frame racket came along, which helped baseliners and returner too much. Back when likes of edberg played, off-centered shots were punished. These days, they make winners off mis-hit shots from the baseline. Volleyers are technicians that force mishit shots before putting them away. These days, it is tough to do that. Overall, no more greater serve and vollyers. Of course, racket companies make huge sales off these sticks on steroids, so they are fine with it.
SVolleyGame 2 years ago
of course absolutely fucking brilliant but u forget one major thing. Wide frames werent as deadly as the new strings, even in the old frames these new strings give a shit load of control thats why shots why the worst hit shots still stay in "guys can take cave men swings at the ball"-- Roddick. they get away with too much, its one of the biggest reasons for federers dominance, He has always just put the ball back in to play and waited for errors when he gets outplayed
quiet1234 2 years ago
JimAsian1,
well it is a huge mess now. Ultimately what they tried was to stop big-serve wonders, which I agree they were making games really boring to watch. So they slowed the ball and court. But they realize that it does not really make much difference. What is the difference between 150 and 120 mph serve at T's in real matches? Not much.
SVolleyGame 2 years ago
RF R Hi, it doesn't make sense what they're trying to do. I mean they make the rackets more powerful, yet they try to slow the game down with bigger balls. Wouldn't it make more sense to stop
trying to make the rackets more powerful?
Peace Respect
JimAsian1 2 years ago
if you are being thrashed that badly, you've got to change up your game...muster must have been satisfied with his performance from the baseline.
come in, drop shot, use slice, anything but what you're doing.
sharpasaneraser 2 years ago
Wow, I remember this match - I was there that night ! After all these years.. - Edberg made it look sooo easy - too easy
jochooi 2 years ago
7:03 shot is that a regular slice but no backswing?
supertrex2 2 years ago
they both have this weird moving before return of serve.
supertrex2 2 years ago
poor Muster, he never won a match against Edberg!
RATio77 2 years ago 2
Ahah "beaten like a drum", I had never heard of that but that's too funny ..nothing to take away from Muster though, he was a great player.
Thetoughestweight1 2 years ago 2
Stefan Edberg won the Junior Grand Slam:)
spartyutube 2 years ago
Watching Edberg play here is like poetry in motion. Such a beautiful and artistic style of tennis that you just dont see any more. Amazing stuff from my favourite player of all time.
alin1975 2 years ago 16
Thanks a lot for this clip. I have heard commentators (Drysdale, McEnroe) speak of Muster "getting beat like a drum" against Edberg, et voila!
dzee127 2 years ago 2
this agressive tennis by edberg ...wow
ampiciline 3 years ago 10
great video - love Edberg soooo much. He is kinda like how I see all serve and volleyers - essentially a Jedi Knight who insists on using a one handed backhand and volleys. Anyone can use two hands and sit at the back of the court, it takes a Jedi to handle this kind of pressure play like he does.
Watching him makes me wonder why more people on and off the tour dont employ serve and volley tactics more often. it's just lethal.
kegsterino12 3 years ago 4
its because they dont know how to, they are trained specifically for back court play, if a good serve volleyer comes along such as rafter, edberg etc they would wipe the floor with the majority of players out there atm.
raff23 2 years ago 4
No they cant technology is against them, it is just too phyiscally demanding, serve volley tennis is destructive on the body and even worse when serve volleyers have to play like endurance atheltes thanks to technology and change in balls and courts. guys stay back and they do half the work they used to.
quiet1234 2 years ago
waaaaaaaaat?
serve and volley is long term easier on the body it is easier once you get better at it, the reason no one is serve volley right noa is cuz 10 years ago everyone decided to start playing from the baseline
mathiyus 2 years ago
The courts are slower and balls are heavier and slightly bigger then before. :(
renegade101112 2 years ago
the ICEMAN! awesome edberg
mint1mint2 3 years ago 2
million thanks mate for another out of this world volleying from the master.. i want more more :)
rkvids 3 years ago 2