He has backpedaled about reading the columns in his newsletter. Obviously he knew about the kind of content being put out in his name. He just didn't care.
@aChristianforRonPaul haha naive foolish boy, he promoted this newsletter in a C span interview :) then when he runs for office he denounces it..he can't have it both ways plus if he can't even control what his publishing company puts out how can he run a country
@SeongKYi try researching about his racist newsletter... you will find some interesting things about how he didnt write all of them, and how that one was written by an anonymous person while ron paul went out of politics to be an OBGYN and the "full pdf" of the specific letter in question had half of page 8 missing showing that it was not written by ron paul and had not read at all. he does take the heat from it tho and apologizes for it. also it is 1 racist letter, thats it.
If he doesn't truly want White Supremacist support, then how come has support from people who want to make it illegal to be gay and punishable by death? The man is a liar.
It's truly staggering that someone, in their own society running for office, doesn't want (or feels forced to not want?) the support of people of his own race who wish to protect their own race and civilisation!
@SKOTP69 White culture, if it truly exists is only a destroyer of other cultures. Protect their own race and civilization? How so? by hate, violence, and destruction of others who are non-white? Hate violence and destruction done to a peoples' only breeds more hate violence and destruction see any American inner-citiy. We need peace, freedom, and self-respect. That is what my country, America is about.
Well, considering Obama has the support of black supremacists, I dont see why it matters if white supremacists want to see a candidate that protects their right to be racists. Seems like everyone else's right to be racist has been sacred for quite a while. Should be no surprise that those people like a politician who believes in no special classes/privileges for any group of people over another. All men are created equal by their maker, no?
I think that what they are doing to the Muslims in the middle east is racist too. We have heard many soldiers say that their leaders are very racist, dehumanizing the civilians with their pet names, like Hadji, towel head, rag head, camel jockey, Aucknog, etc..before killing them by the bushelfull. Ron Paul is against this kind of discrimination too.
@SKOTP69 As a Christian, I think that Moslems shouldn't mess with the Christians as a group. I do not agree with religions that are for discriminating and killing those who aren't adherents. As a young Christian, we would go out in groups for fun and meet new people everywhere, spreading the word, no matter what their color, background, status. Peace on earth goodwill towards all - it was like a sales pitch, and we were selling peace to anyone willing to listen. Now Christians fear?
Too many questions abound, especially with Ron Paul's newsletters. Too many unanswered questions. Dr. Paul also spoke at an anniversary dinner for the John Birch Society a few months ago. Young people like Dr. Paul and have no fear of this because they weren't around in the 50's and 60's. They are not familiar with McCarthyism and I'm sure have no clue about the history of the John Birch Society. This country's going backwards and not in a good way.
@3o4Titties Go to The New American online, that is their news outlet. There are also links to check out. I was an active member for about 1 year. As a neophyte to the organization, I didn't see any dirty back door dealings, nor racists, not any homophobes, not any anti-jew, just educating people that we have a legal document to become familiar with and we need to hold the politicians in our state accountable for their actions, praise them when good, scold them when bad. We wrote em.
I just can’t figure out why anyone would think Ron Paul wrote those racist, bigoted newsletters..
So what if they were published from his home and who cares if they ran for 30 years! At least he made a shit load of money, and NO I don’t care that he profited from racism! HE CAN’T EVEN BE RACIST BECAUSE I QUOTE GANDHI! AND!..AND! ..um FREEDOM!! AND LIBERTY! AND.. oh ya- AND RACISM IS A COLLECTIVISM or somethin.. um.. RON PAUL IS OUR ONLY HOPE
If you're a racist supporting Ron Paul, you're a dumbass. Libertarianism is the enemy of all prejudice because you can't pick someone out because they come from specific groups. Everyone is an individual so you have no reason to be prejudiced.
@surfer53 In theory Libertarianism doesn't RECOGNIZE race, but there's a problem here. America DOES. Ron Paul as president is not going to indoctrinate every single American into Libertarianism and magically wipe away race. Its going to empower states, and lessen the power the Federal Government has to enforce civil rights. RAND Paul has explicitly stated that he is against the 14th amendment and that it is more evil for the law to prevent businesses from discriminating! His son!
@747t Why do you need a law to tell you not to go to a business run by racists and discriminating against others based on race? I don't. Never did. But now the government has this neat little tool it can use to force people to give jobs to people based on race and not performance. Isn't that racism? Doesnt a racist company harm itself and risk its own survival by excluding productive people based on race? Alienating a public that does not tolerate racism? What is the real purpose of such a law?
@ljs96076 Go to one of the businesses being set up by the foreign racial/ethnic groups now flooding into the US, and elsewhere in the West, and see how "non-racist" they are! Yeah, right!
@surfer53 I would disagree with Libertarianism being the enemy of all prejudice, since businesses would be able to discriminate on any grounds, and individuals would be able to be prejudicial in who they interact with.
@surfer53 You're wrong on that because in a free society, you are not forced to integrate, and that's why they support him. All walks of life support him because freedom is universally appealing. It doesn't make a difference whether you like niggers or not.
@surfer53 Its impossible to be a libertarian and not be called "racist"/"white supremacist" sooner or later. Because by the definition of the zionist-gang anyone that isnt anti-white or is against anti-white policies such as affirmative action is a "racist".
I don't get why so many people over at StormFront and other White Supremacist groups support Ron Paul. Ron Paul supports liberty for EVERYONE, regardless of race, gender or religion. I get that he doesn't support foreign aid to Israel, so maybe that is the reason they are up on him, but that is only one issue out of many. White Supremacist groups should run their own candidate that fits their ideology, and get out of Ron Paul's way. Support liberty and justice for ALL! Ron Paul 2012!
@LibertyMike1 He wants to get rid of the 1964 Civil Rights Acts that prevents people from denying service to black people. He also is against the government disinvesting from companies involved in the Sudanese genocide. He newsletter also published a racist screed about how fleet-footed black males were to blame for crime.
@Rosscifer That part of the civil rights act should be repealed for the protection of black people. Right now they unknowingly support financially places of business that would deny them service if they would be allowed but now they can't so they take their money and do god knows what to their food. The newsletter stuff is just a bunch of bullshit that everyone who knows Paul knows he had nothing to do with those words as they are completely against the core values of Libertarianism.
@LibertyMike1 from what i read from stormfronters, they support him cos hes the least toxic candidate out of all of them. Many of his views are against there agenda but many more are also for there agenda.
basically hes the best out of a shitty situation for them, beggers can't be choosers
@LibertyMike1 "I don't get why so many people over at StormFront and other White Supremacist groups support Ron Paul."
Just cuz Ron Paul is NOT a racist, that is something very unique in the western world. In the western world anti-white racism is the norm. Equally for all is something baffling in the west. No racist affirmative action, no more mass-immigration no more discrimination for whites in academica and so on. Ron Paul is an actual anti-racist, not just anti-white.
Ron Paul has the broadest base of individual contributors of any candidate for the Presidency. Its asinine to hold the assumption that he should take a fine tooth comb and go through the belief system of each of those who donate.
And Paul made a great point, isn't it better that he has their money instead of the white supremacist? With that money he can come closer to creating positive change in our country.
This is why Ron Paul falls short of being a decent candidate and is essentially a lesser evil amongst greater evils. He won't give us a whites-only nation.
@beachjuicetice Well we better hope he really does support us secretly. Lesser members of white society should not be propped up just because of their failings as a race.
@compactdisk2: I said, "Ron Paul had NOTHING to do with that newletter at that point". You missed the important part: AT THAT POINT. Ron Paul started the newsletter and dropped it, but it was continued without his involvement.
"Ron Paul had NOTHING to do with that newletter at that point."
Which of course must be why he opposes the death penalty. Face it dude: you're doing nothing here but spewing politics of hatred. Nothing factual. Just hate.
@marinm777 Of course they will, because they don't ask WHY and then research. They take what is spewed out of the talking heads' collective mouth as gospel - as God's own word, and they run with it, right to the God damned, Godless poll booth and vote in the "ESTABLISHMENT'S" pick.
The fact that the Ron Paul Newsletter published a number of very racist articles throughout the 90's is pretty good evidence he's racist. Of course he's adamant he didn't write them... but there's no possible way he could have been unaware these things were being published in his name. I also realize he's got a non-racist justification for opposing civil rights, but that still leaves a horrific taste in my mouth.
@compactdisk2 You're a fool and a pawn. To think that Ron Paul pre-screened every single newsletter before it was put out is just ridiculous. He's a busy man, he has people for that. Now, if those people were gotten to, either bribed or bitter, they could very easily torpedo him in that way. If he claims he didn't write them, what has he done to make you not believe him? If nothing, then I suggest you give him the benefit of the doubt... that is if you can ween yourself off of the koolaid.
@Jaenus80 Are you fucking kidding me? I never said he wrote them. Whether he wrote them or not is not the issue... but if you think that he let EXTREMELY racist articles come out over the course of FIVE YEARS without knowing and putting a stop to it, he's either incompetent, or he didn't have a problem with it.
@compactdisk2 Also, even if he's not racist, he's still a) opposed to civil rights (based on a stubborn attachment to "absolute freedom" no matter how many people are treated unfairly, or even die), b) completely scientifically ignorant, to the point of being a creationist, and c) he's a fucking libertarian. You can't get more economically naive than that (I'm sure all you "we've got to return to the gold standard" morons are frothing at the bit". I'm sorry, but your politics are a joke.)
@compactdisk2 I find it funny that you're calling a fact, a statistic, a non-living thing, racist. How can a non-living thing have hatred for an entire group of people based upon race? Sure, the facts listed in his newsletter were unkind, not pretty, and certainly nothing worth bragging about, and yea it made the blacks look bad, but the facts are the facts. Trying to label them as racist to get people to ignore them is sinister - and frankly I question whether you have ever read his articles
@compactdisk2 get a life, loser. You know very well that Ron Paul neither endorses nor supports any form of racism. If you don't you're just ignorant and I apologize for calling you a loser instead of just a dumbass...
@rgs11 If you'd actually examined the evidence (which I seriously doubt you'll do, you probably refuse to take in any opinions that don't validate your beliefs), you'd see that there are very real reasons for asking serious questions about Ron Paul's racism. Obviously he's not standing there promoting genocide, but anyone who looks at the evidence and still holds Ron Paul on a pedestal is a deluded fool. The man is a creationist, and holds his libertarian ideals above the value of human life.
@compactdisk2 You're an idiot... Make up your mind. You called him a racist with ABSOLUTELY NO evidence. It's because you have worthless ideas (if any at all) that you resort to ad hominem attacks against a truly honorable man whom DESPISES RACISM! You're a fuc(ing racist, loser...
@rgs11 If you'd actually examined the evidence (which I seriously doubt you'll do, you probably refuse to take in any opinions that don't validate your beliefs), you'd see that there are very real reasons for asking serious questions about Ron Paul's racism. Obviously he's not standing there promoting genocide, but anyone who looks at the evidence and still holds Ron Paul on a pedestal is a deluded fool. The man is a creationist, and holds his libertarian ideals above the value of human life.
@rgs11 If you'd actually examined the evidence (which I seriously doubt you'll do, you probably refuse to take in any opinions that don't validate your beliefs), you'd see that there are very real reasons for asking serious questions about Ron Paul's racism. Obviously he's not standing there promoting genocide, but anyone who looks at the evidence and still holds Ron Paul on a pedestal is a deluded fool. The man is a creationist, and holds his libertarian ideals above the value of human life.
@rgs11 Have you considered actually presenting an argument instead of just tossing off insults. I fucking hate when I try to bring up genuine points, and all people like you can come back with is "STFU! Stop trying to act so smart... you big dummy!" I don't get why people are so desperate to kiss Paul's ass. Yes, he's less of a shill than most republicans, and he at least stands up for what he believes in. It's just that what he believes in is complete dogmatic, anti-science nonsense.
@rgs11 If you'd actually examined the evidence (which I seriously doubt you'll do, you probably refuse to take in any opinions that don't validate your beliefs), you'd see that there are very real reasons for asking serious questions about Ron Paul's racism. Obviously he's not standing there promoting genocide, but anyone who looks at the evidence and still holds Ron Paul on a pedestal is a deluded fool. The man is a creationist, and holds his libertarian ideals above the value of human life.
It's way to late for Ron Paul to try to jet away at flank speed from all the neo-nazis, anti-semites and 9-11 truthers he's cozied up by the the burning cross with. Get you ass to the Libertarian Party Ron... Republicans rejected you soundly in 2008 and we'll do it again in 2012.
I understand that Ron Paul doesn't want White supremacists supporting him because the liberal media will use it against him. But that shouldn't even be a big issue, the more support - more voters. As a racist I don't agree with his extremely individualistic and anti-racist standing, in that sense Jefferson was above him. But in everything else he's brilliant. Sorry Ron, David Duke and Stormfront (who are white nationalists, NOT white supremacists) already support you.
I understand that Ron Paul doesn't want White supremacists supporting him because the liberal media will use it against him. But that shouldn't even be a big issue, the more support - more voters. As a racist I don't agree with his extremely individualistic and anti-racist standing, in that sense Jefferson was above him. But in everything else he's brilliant. Sorry Ron, David Duke and Stormfront (who are white nationalists, NOT white supremacists) already support you.
I don't see why anyone would care that white supremacists support them. White supremacists are overwhelmingly against the Iraq and Afghan war... does that mean the anti-war movement is racist? People are such idiots. Ron, I know you're trying to win an election but don't take shit from the liberal hypocrites. You took Don Black's money and there's nothing wrong with that.
remember to register REPUB if you are a DEM and want to vote Ron Paul. FL and many others are closed primary states so you MUST be a registered REPUB to vote Ron Paul in the primary -that 's where it counts because that determines the Repub nominee - NOT the Nov. election. Ron Paul CANNOT win unless he gets the REPUB nomination in the primary - please change to REPUB ASAP- do not get cheated out of your vote ,don;t let them cheat ROn Paul on a technicality
@MrSafetymeeting Because as he says" It would muddy the waters " - he doesn't want his good name tarnished with more rumors that he is a racist . He has enough good, decent people supporting him and he doesn't need or want to be associated with white supremacists.
1.) Why does he have White Supremacists support in the first place, 2.) Why will he keep their money, after saying he doesn't want their support, 3.) are we supposed to believe anything this liar says after realizing that: he votes no after inserting pork for his district (knowing the bill will pass even if he votes no), is photographed with Don Black, votes against donor identity disclosure laws so he can get away with lame excuses like these, and no one really knows where his money comes from
@arcanedawn5 he has support from everybody, even in the porn industry. you wish to label him as endorsing his supporters views.. typical "guilt by association" nonsense when clearly the man is all about people being themselves even when it's unpopular.
@arcanedawn5 Judoflipper answered 1 & 2 for 3 it's playing the only leverage one can in a corrupted system. He represents people of his district that have had money forcefully stolen from them if he can't get something back for them or derail the bs crap what is the point of representation. If I took your money and punched you in the face wouldn't be nice to see that I dropped the money I stole when I was swinging my fist your way? I'd like to see my Rep do the same for me to derail or a refund
To answer your question kemetkush, it's because they're scared to death. The status quo is that conservatives keep them down with institutionalized racism. The war on drugs is a prime example and it works via stratification. The liberals keep them down because they need to keep them dependent as a constituency and don't want to lose the ability to manipulate them. Ron Paul would upset the whole apple cart and most blacks would finally come to see how badly they've been misused by the forces of
in 1996 ron paul admited to writing the racist newsletters saying that he was "being quoted out of context",years later he retracted saying that he didn't know who wrote those letters,what a lying racist piece of shit!
@geiuy that issue has already been resolved and it was a ghostwriter. nice try dumb ass. that was not ron paul as already proven. Obama ass is going down!
@judoflipper98 listen,fanboy,i don't give a shit about obama.your idol made a LOT of money from the newspapers and the racist articles where written to he's name yet he couldn't stop the publishing of those degrading articles for years?r u guys serious?if a man can't run a newsletter how can he run a country?,u ron paul's groupie's can still vote for him even if u admit that there is something weird about this newletter's story,so stop looking like stupid groupies and admit it
@judoflipper98 if u had a hint of personality and self respect you would admit that there is something not quite right about the hole newsletter story,u can keep voting your idol but at least stop licking he's hairy old ass and be a little more of a man....think with your own brain
@kemetkush in 1996 ron paul admited to writing the racist newsletters saying that he was "being quoted out of context",years later he retracted saying that he didn't know who wrote those letters,what a lying racist piece of shit!
RON PAUL, WE ARE STILL WAITING FOR AN ANSWER! TELL AMERICAN PEOPLE HOW EXACTLY RU GOING TO CREATE JOBS? OK LETS SAY ALL TROOPS CAME BACK AND THEN WHAT? THEY ARE GOING TO SELL IPHONES AND BLACKBERRIES? DUDE BE A MEN, HOW RU GOING TO CREATE JOBS? POPULATION OF CHINA IS 1.4 B CHINESE WORK LIKE ROBOTS, BE HONEST TELL AMERICAN PEOPLE TO BUY UR BOOK U NEED CASH , U LOVE POWER, U LOVE CASH, U WILL NEVER CREATE JOBS, U HAVE NO ANSWER!
I hate when they make Ron Paul answer ridiculous questions. During the 2008 Republican debate they asked him if he believe 9/11 was an inside job (which it was, but Paul obviously can't say that out loud). They wouldn't ask any other candidate that question. The media does this in order to degrade him.
@st1ckycheese Exactly my friend! This is an old tactic used the left since the late-60s - heck, even Hitler used it. After all, he's the one that said "if you tell a lie often enough, people will believe it" and if you throw enough mud, some of it will stick. By asking Ron Paul questions like this, they're deliberately planting seeds of doubt in the publics mind. It's a sickening tactic and I for one will never buy that bs leftist propaganda.
@matrix4022 Hitler mentions that quote in Mein Kampf in reference to the Jews, and not to himself. That is one of the most famous of his quotes which is taken out of context to make it look like he had to tell lies to get into power. What he really said was that the Jews repeat the same lie over and over in the press and eventually it becomes a "fact" in the public through the process of repetition. An examples of this is the claim of WMD in Iraq - a war which was started by israel and the Jews
@st1ckycheese make a concious effort to vocally and in written form make a distinction between jews and zionists. If youre not aware of the dinstinction, research it. It extremely important
I wonder if this woman asked al sharpton if he would make a statement that he didn't want support from black panthers, black extremists, black militants, etc. Did she ask Sotomayor if she would renounce all support from La Raza? This is a bullshit interview. Paul did not handle it well. What about womens groups demanding special affirmative action, does this woman renounce all affirmative action, does she renounce all womens groups supporting affirmative action?
i'm not really clear on his political motifs and beliefs but what he says here earns him a little respect for me. now i might change my mind when i do more research on him but at least he's not a white supremacist!
this woman drills him on white supremacy but zionist supremacists are allowed to be in our political offices....why doesn't anyone realize that? There are few white supremacists and those that are have little power. there are many zionist supremacists and they are running the country. We must stop them. we must stand against their etnic cleansing of the Palistinians.
@hailourvictory Sorry, I am not an Obama basher but his lack of standing up to Israel's ethnic cleansing and letting netanyahu run shod over him totally turned me away from wanting to see him re-elected. he does nothing but bark on the very important issues....we need REAL change and that means a change in how america deals with zionism.....They practically run our country incognito and people like Obama allow them. He actually has them on his staff. no vote for Obama
I'm Hispanic, and frankly, I could care less who donates to the Paul campaign. If a white or another racial supremacist donates to to his campaign, they're probably going to disappointed if they think they're going to get a collectivist in office.
Ron Paul is a solid individualist
Keep the money Paul.
The establishment is going to try to bring you down.
@TheCaliCapitalist i dont think he will miss voters. A lot of Black people support Ron Paul more than many other candidates. He can possibly beat obama.
A lot of black people probably do support him more than many other candidates. But then again most wont vote for him. The way the republican ticket is looking I dont think Obama is going to have any serious competition
The reporters only job here is to tarnish his name by simply mentioning "White Supremacy". Ron Paul speaks the truth, and a lot of folks aren't comfortable with that. If you believe Obama (who I voted for) is telling you the truth, then send a message here; I'd like to hear positive and negative.From what I have researched, Obama has lied about everything he has promised. By the way, I'm not Republican, Democrat, or any of that.
If you believe in race, you are a racist. Race was created by elitist Europeans to divide the poor, create conditions for slavery so the people would be too busy looking at each other than the politicians and bankers who bleed them dry. If there is any hope for the USA, race most become obsolete and never used. ...if not, you'll fall right back in the same hole. ...or maybe cause another civil war. Race is not science, it's a lie.
and no one else did? obama accepted money from the black panthers. what about "hate the gooks" mccain?
he didn't consciously take money from them or ask for it. money was given to his campaign for him to promote freedom - something we should all value.
by your rationale, should we all be condemned for using money that's been gained only through the killing of millions of people around the world? or that same money that has most likely been involved with drugs in in some way?
I hope that this guy decides to run again in 2012. If we can get a guy like him in office.... an honest man, a man that pisses off both democrats and republicans, a man that wants the U.S. to mind its own business........ that's the man that I'll vote for, and I usually vote Democrat.
They attacked the short-lived European American Heritage Appreciation Association, open to everyone, by labeling it 'white supremacist'. It's sole purpose was to build one revisionist-history safe library in order to preserve America's politically incorrect past. They have and will continue attacking ANY white group whose purpose is white appreciation, communication and survival on the grounds of being 'Supremacist'. At this rate they won't be satisfied - Wait a minute. Just who are "they"?
Unless you're willing to put your reputation on the line and say/show (with proof) in a public setting with legal/lawful consequences that the majority of the voters of the district he's in are all white supremacists (which to me would show you may be sincere, though probably misinformed), I think Ron is going to be fine without those type of people supporting him. Saying everyone in a certain place are of a certain ideology is easy to do with the anonymity of the web to protect you.
@MoneysnHoneys Yes he had a racist white supremacist news letter sent under his name for 15 years and he knew nothing about it... You need to be one brainwashed fucktard to buy this. .. He is a liar. Period.
Hmmm, didn't you say you are Anti-Racist? Mitt Romney is a Mormon. His church, (LDS) is know for it's racism towards blacks. Blacks were denied Priesthood up until 1978. Romney acknowledges that, but refuses to denounce his church's racism.
@MidNiteR32 I am a Morman, and a person of color. If you don't fully understand what your talking about then you shouldn't make these kind of comments. I am proud to be a Morman, but you couldn't pay me to vote for Mitt Romney. Much of the info you find on the Internet is false and inaccurate. Before you put down an entire religion, take time to find out about it. Unless of coarse you believe all catholics are rapist and all muslims are terrorists.
Obviously you didn't understand my comment, I said the LDS has had a history of racism by not letting blacks take part in priesthood up until 1978. My main point was pointing out Mitt Romney's racism on how he refuses to denounce the LDS church's racism.
Ron Paul represents a red neck district in Texas. He says that he doesn't want their support, but without it he never would have been elected to Congress.
@JimmyFormerMarine Well, if it's OK for you to be racist and generalize as you believe it is true, then I assume you have no problem with, or are supportive of, any racism in Ron Paul's district.
@didles123 I am anti-racism. And I oppose the racists who vote for Ron Paul. And I would never vote for him. If I lived in Paul's district, I would vote for the Democrat, whoever that might be, just to see Paul defeated.
@JimmyFormerMarine If you are ant-racism, why would you vote for a democrat? They're the only part remaining that still supports institutionalized racism which they sugarcoat with the title "affirmative action".
You don't make any sense. You have no problem discriminating against a race and region of people, yet believe others shouldn't do the same. I can't even debate with you on an ideological level because your beliefs contradict themselves.
haha, I can see by the comments all you "I'm not racist" while La Raza(The Race) The New Black Panthers etc. grow everyday in America and don't care if you call them racist. but fortunately I know that many white people aren't like this and we laugh at you.. and the mexicans and blacks laugh at you even harder!
Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups rather than individuals.
By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called diversity acutaly perpetuate racism. Their obsession with racial group identity is inherently racist.
We should understand that racism will endure until we stop thinking in terms of groups and begin thinking in terms of individual liberty.
Ron Paul is the only non idiocracy-like president. He doesn't dance around questions, he tells things how they are in an up front manner. How can we NOT be sick of our modern politicians these days, lets vote for someone who actually SAYS STUFF
he just contradicted himself. not wanting their support makes more sense. while taking their money is certainly a plus, being associated with them is probably more negative than the money is positive.
Ron Paul Is awsm sometimes
Matrixkool99 1 week ago
Damn Ron paullllllyyy ftw
DaddyFatSzack 1 week ago
He has backpedaled about reading the columns in his newsletter. Obviously he knew about the kind of content being put out in his name. He just didn't care.
LeVidocq 1 week ago
@aChristianforRonPaul haha naive foolish boy, he promoted this newsletter in a C span interview :) then when he runs for office he denounces it..he can't have it both ways plus if he can't even control what his publishing company puts out how can he run a country
Malcom123X 2 weeks ago
But he will keep their money. To date, he has not return the money he collected from his racist newsletter. He is a fraud and hypocrite.
SeongKYi 3 weeks ago
@SeongKYi Did you hear what he said about that? He is going to use the money for good things.
aChristianforRonPaul 3 weeks ago
@SeongKYi try researching about his racist newsletter... you will find some interesting things about how he didnt write all of them, and how that one was written by an anonymous person while ron paul went out of politics to be an OBGYN and the "full pdf" of the specific letter in question had half of page 8 missing showing that it was not written by ron paul and had not read at all. he does take the heat from it tho and apologizes for it. also it is 1 racist letter, thats it.
MrXenu1 2 weeks ago
If you Retarded Ron Paul Supporters want to continue your support, do so after knowing who Phillip G. Kayser is.
SmartGuy4today 3 weeks ago
If he doesn't truly want White Supremacist support, then how come has support from people who want to make it illegal to be gay and punishable by death? The man is a liar.
SmartGuy4today 3 weeks ago
@SmartGuy4today And where did he say he wants support from them?
aChristianforRonPaul 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
SmartGuy4today 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please learn how to type in English correctly, nothing you had just typed had made any coherent sense.
SmartGuy4today 2 weeks ago
"I don't" - LOLLED at the interviewers face right then
Madfoot713 4 weeks ago
"White supremacy muddy's the water." I lol'd.
allstarx67 4 weeks ago
Honor is more important than freedom. May peace find these white supremesists, all we want is to do is live in peace
thesonnyboy017 1 month ago
When 'everyone' supports Ron Paul, the supremacist do. Freedom does happen to allow some people to be assholes.
Oh wait, people act like racism doesn't exist, right now, but after the elections it would. Weird.
Corvus133 1 month ago
Libertarianism and ron paul is racist because he wants to end welfare and blacks and mexicans need that welfare or we will die.
Jiggaburt 1 month ago
@Jiggaburt Welcome to reality. Get a job or die.
Corvus133 1 month ago
It's truly staggering that someone, in their own society running for office, doesn't want (or feels forced to not want?) the support of people of his own race who wish to protect their own race and civilisation!
SKOTP69 1 month ago
@SKOTP69 White culture, if it truly exists is only a destroyer of other cultures. Protect their own race and civilization? How so? by hate, violence, and destruction of others who are non-white? Hate violence and destruction done to a peoples' only breeds more hate violence and destruction see any American inner-citiy. We need peace, freedom, and self-respect. That is what my country, America is about.
thesonnyboy017 1 month ago
Well, considering Obama has the support of black supremacists, I dont see why it matters if white supremacists want to see a candidate that protects their right to be racists. Seems like everyone else's right to be racist has been sacred for quite a while. Should be no surprise that those people like a politician who believes in no special classes/privileges for any group of people over another. All men are created equal by their maker, no?
ljs96076 1 month ago
Ron Paul likes pie and so do white supremacists....therefore Ron Paul is a white supremacist.
crackersoul21 1 month ago 35
@crackersoul21 Exactly...haha.
juliejewel 1 month ago
@crackersoul21 There's a fallacy in your logic. It's sound, but invalid.
kesquisse 1 month ago
@kesquisse Validity is required for an argument to be sound. In order to be sound, an argument must be valid and all of its premises must be true.
DanteAsearis 4 weeks ago
@crackersoul21 Ron Paul published a white supremacist newsletter, supported it and profited off it... therefore Ron Paul is an asshole
Malcom123X 3 weeks ago
@Malcom123X No he didn't. And Ron Paul is not a liar, unlike most politicians.
aChristianforRonPaul 3 weeks ago
@crackersoul21 Ron Paul lies about it years later.....therefore Ron Paul is a liar
Malcom123X 3 weeks ago
I think that what they are doing to the Muslims in the middle east is racist too. We have heard many soldiers say that their leaders are very racist, dehumanizing the civilians with their pet names, like Hadji, towel head, rag head, camel jockey, Aucknog, etc..before killing them by the bushelfull. Ron Paul is against this kind of discrimination too.
sibkiss2009 1 month ago
@sibkiss2009 How about what the Muslims have been doing all this time since they CONQUERED so much of the Middle East? (and elsewhere?)
SKOTP69 1 month ago
@SKOTP69 As a Christian, I think that Moslems shouldn't mess with the Christians as a group. I do not agree with religions that are for discriminating and killing those who aren't adherents. As a young Christian, we would go out in groups for fun and meet new people everywhere, spreading the word, no matter what their color, background, status. Peace on earth goodwill towards all - it was like a sales pitch, and we were selling peace to anyone willing to listen. Now Christians fear?
sibkiss2009 4 weeks ago
Too many questions abound, especially with Ron Paul's newsletters. Too many unanswered questions. Dr. Paul also spoke at an anniversary dinner for the John Birch Society a few months ago. Young people like Dr. Paul and have no fear of this because they weren't around in the 50's and 60's. They are not familiar with McCarthyism and I'm sure have no clue about the history of the John Birch Society. This country's going backwards and not in a good way.
MsThebeMoon 1 month ago
@MsThebeMoon Tell me about JBS? I'm curious.
3o4Titties 1 month ago
@3o4Titties Go to The New American online, that is their news outlet. There are also links to check out. I was an active member for about 1 year. As a neophyte to the organization, I didn't see any dirty back door dealings, nor racists, not any homophobes, not any anti-jew, just educating people that we have a legal document to become familiar with and we need to hold the politicians in our state accountable for their actions, praise them when good, scold them when bad. We wrote em.
sibkiss2009 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I just can’t figure out why anyone would think Ron Paul wrote those racist, bigoted newsletters..
So what if they were published from his home and who cares if they ran for 30 years! At least he made a shit load of money, and NO I don’t care that he profited from racism! HE CAN’T EVEN BE RACIST BECAUSE I QUOTE GANDHI! AND!..AND! ..um FREEDOM!! AND LIBERTY! AND.. oh ya- AND RACISM IS A COLLECTIVISM or somethin.. um.. RON PAUL IS OUR ONLY HOPE
darknight651 1 month ago
If you're a racist supporting Ron Paul, you're a dumbass. Libertarianism is the enemy of all prejudice because you can't pick someone out because they come from specific groups. Everyone is an individual so you have no reason to be prejudiced.
surfer53 1 month ago 27
@surfer53 In theory Libertarianism doesn't RECOGNIZE race, but there's a problem here. America DOES. Ron Paul as president is not going to indoctrinate every single American into Libertarianism and magically wipe away race. Its going to empower states, and lessen the power the Federal Government has to enforce civil rights. RAND Paul has explicitly stated that he is against the 14th amendment and that it is more evil for the law to prevent businesses from discriminating! His son!
747t 1 month ago
@747t Why do you need a law to tell you not to go to a business run by racists and discriminating against others based on race? I don't. Never did. But now the government has this neat little tool it can use to force people to give jobs to people based on race and not performance. Isn't that racism? Doesnt a racist company harm itself and risk its own survival by excluding productive people based on race? Alienating a public that does not tolerate racism? What is the real purpose of such a law?
ljs96076 1 month ago
@ljs96076 Go to one of the businesses being set up by the foreign racial/ethnic groups now flooding into the US, and elsewhere in the West, and see how "non-racist" they are! Yeah, right!
SKOTP69 1 month ago
@surfer53 I would disagree with Libertarianism being the enemy of all prejudice, since businesses would be able to discriminate on any grounds, and individuals would be able to be prejudicial in who they interact with.
totheman 1 month ago
@surfer53 You're wrong on that because in a free society, you are not forced to integrate, and that's why they support him. All walks of life support him because freedom is universally appealing. It doesn't make a difference whether you like niggers or not.
DracoPilamZ 1 month ago
@surfer53
In theory. In theory, communism was perfect.
1tephania 4 weeks ago
@surfer53 Its impossible to be a libertarian and not be called "racist"/"white supremacist" sooner or later. Because by the definition of the zionist-gang anyone that isnt anti-white or is against anti-white policies such as affirmative action is a "racist".
Coolstertuber 4 weeks ago
I don't get why so many people over at StormFront and other White Supremacist groups support Ron Paul. Ron Paul supports liberty for EVERYONE, regardless of race, gender or religion. I get that he doesn't support foreign aid to Israel, so maybe that is the reason they are up on him, but that is only one issue out of many. White Supremacist groups should run their own candidate that fits their ideology, and get out of Ron Paul's way. Support liberty and justice for ALL! Ron Paul 2012!
LibertyMike1 2 months ago
@LibertyMike1 He wants to get rid of the 1964 Civil Rights Acts that prevents people from denying service to black people. He also is against the government disinvesting from companies involved in the Sudanese genocide. He newsletter also published a racist screed about how fleet-footed black males were to blame for crime.
Rosscifer 1 month ago
@Rosscifer That part of the civil rights act should be repealed for the protection of black people. Right now they unknowingly support financially places of business that would deny them service if they would be allowed but now they can't so they take their money and do god knows what to their food. The newsletter stuff is just a bunch of bullshit that everyone who knows Paul knows he had nothing to do with those words as they are completely against the core values of Libertarianism.
BlindMaphisto 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@LibertyMike1 ....because Ron Paul and his son spoke out against the Civil Rights Act. It's pretty simple math, idiot. Nothing complex going on here.
MIvarsson99 1 month ago
@LibertyMike1 from what i read from stormfronters, they support him cos hes the least toxic candidate out of all of them. Many of his views are against there agenda but many more are also for there agenda.
basically hes the best out of a shitty situation for them, beggers can't be choosers
KoolJayJ 1 month ago
@LibertyMike1 "I don't get why so many people over at StormFront and other White Supremacist groups support Ron Paul."
Just cuz Ron Paul is NOT a racist, that is something very unique in the western world. In the western world anti-white racism is the norm. Equally for all is something baffling in the west. No racist affirmative action, no more mass-immigration no more discrimination for whites in academica and so on. Ron Paul is an actual anti-racist, not just anti-white.
Wylff 1 month ago
I think Ron has made that clear enough. I suspect most of these lies are being spread from the progressives
Avidcomp 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bullshit, ron paul is not a nazi, you are just twisting his words
buffalohunter95 2 months ago
so the only reson he doesnt want the support from nazi's is because it muddies the water? and yet he still took it! RON PAUL IS A NAZI!
dubgabriel 2 months ago
Ron Paul has the broadest base of individual contributors of any candidate for the Presidency. Its asinine to hold the assumption that he should take a fine tooth comb and go through the belief system of each of those who donate.
And Paul made a great point, isn't it better that he has their money instead of the white supremacist? With that money he can come closer to creating positive change in our country.
mikebgood 3 months ago
This is why Ron Paul falls short of being a decent candidate and is essentially a lesser evil amongst greater evils. He won't give us a whites-only nation.
BlueBerryWizard 3 months ago
@BlueBerryWizard
you moron.
of course he can't say he agrees with you in public.
the idea is he has to do a song and dance to get into power, and then once there he can do the right thing regardless of what others think.
beachjuicetice 3 months ago
@beachjuicetice Well we better hope he really does support us secretly. Lesser members of white society should not be propped up just because of their failings as a race.
BlueBerryWizard 3 months ago
Ron Paul is not being honest. If they control every other candidate, chances are they got this one too. Money bombs end up being wasted.
kikthatcan 3 months ago
DON'T FUCK WITH ISRAEL
Th3Insurgent 3 months ago
@Th3Insurgent Who's fucking with Israel?
HebrewFatherland 3 months ago
@Th3Insurgent Yea or they will kill you.... Screw isreal.
DieEverybodyDie 3 months ago
@Th3Insurgent
Israel = Faggots
GuitaristXXVII 2 months ago
Ron Paul confirmed for Jew.
ThatJamesDude 3 months ago
@compactdisk2: I said, "Ron Paul had NOTHING to do with that newletter at that point". You missed the important part: AT THAT POINT. Ron Paul started the newsletter and dropped it, but it was continued without his involvement.
"Ron Paul had NOTHING to do with that newletter at that point."
Which of course must be why he opposes the death penalty. Face it dude: you're doing nothing here but spewing politics of hatred. Nothing factual. Just hate.
Augsnod 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
End of quarter fundraiser for Ron Paul happening now; please consider donating.. it's now or never to get this man in office! - ronpaul2012(dot)com
Bring the troops home
End the war on drugs
Real economic growth
TMaw345 4 months ago
And now some idiots will still say he is racist....
marinm777 4 months ago
@marinm777 Of course they will, because they don't ask WHY and then research. They take what is spewed out of the talking heads' collective mouth as gospel - as God's own word, and they run with it, right to the God damned, Godless poll booth and vote in the "ESTABLISHMENT'S" pick.
Jaenus80 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The fact that the Ron Paul Newsletter published a number of very racist articles throughout the 90's is pretty good evidence he's racist."
The fact that it's old news that Ron Paul had NOTHING to do with that newsletter at that point proves that you don't care about the truth.
Augsnod 4 months ago
"The fact that the Ron Paul Newsletter published a number of very racist articles throughout the 90's is pretty good evidence he's racist."
The fact that it's old news that Ron Paul had NOTHING to do with that newletter at that point proves that you don't care about the truth.
Augsnod 4 months ago
@Augsnod Ron Paul had NOTHING to do with the "Ron Paul Newsletter"? Give me a break...
compactdisk2 4 months ago
The fact that the Ron Paul Newsletter published a number of very racist articles throughout the 90's is pretty good evidence he's racist. Of course he's adamant he didn't write them... but there's no possible way he could have been unaware these things were being published in his name. I also realize he's got a non-racist justification for opposing civil rights, but that still leaves a horrific taste in my mouth.
compactdisk2 4 months ago
@compactdisk2 - You're absolutely right!
The evidence of Ron Paul's racism is very compelling. Paul's connections to white supremacist organizations is a serious cause for concern.
Too bad the corporate media [including, sadly, Jon Stewart] has been silent about this issue.
csilva85 4 months ago
@compactdisk2 You're a fool and a pawn. To think that Ron Paul pre-screened every single newsletter before it was put out is just ridiculous. He's a busy man, he has people for that. Now, if those people were gotten to, either bribed or bitter, they could very easily torpedo him in that way. If he claims he didn't write them, what has he done to make you not believe him? If nothing, then I suggest you give him the benefit of the doubt... that is if you can ween yourself off of the koolaid.
Jaenus80 4 months ago
@Jaenus80 Are you fucking kidding me? I never said he wrote them. Whether he wrote them or not is not the issue... but if you think that he let EXTREMELY racist articles come out over the course of FIVE YEARS without knowing and putting a stop to it, he's either incompetent, or he didn't have a problem with it.
compactdisk2 4 months ago
@compactdisk2 Also, even if he's not racist, he's still a) opposed to civil rights (based on a stubborn attachment to "absolute freedom" no matter how many people are treated unfairly, or even die), b) completely scientifically ignorant, to the point of being a creationist, and c) he's a fucking libertarian. You can't get more economically naive than that (I'm sure all you "we've got to return to the gold standard" morons are frothing at the bit". I'm sorry, but your politics are a joke.)
compactdisk2 4 months ago
@compactdisk2 I find it funny that you're calling a fact, a statistic, a non-living thing, racist. How can a non-living thing have hatred for an entire group of people based upon race? Sure, the facts listed in his newsletter were unkind, not pretty, and certainly nothing worth bragging about, and yea it made the blacks look bad, but the facts are the facts. Trying to label them as racist to get people to ignore them is sinister - and frankly I question whether you have ever read his articles
Jaenus80 3 months ago
@Jaenus80
The truth is racist.
omegapoint777 3 months ago
@omegapoint777 Apparently so. :)
Jaenus80 3 months ago
@compactdisk2 get a life, loser. You know very well that Ron Paul neither endorses nor supports any form of racism. If you don't you're just ignorant and I apologize for calling you a loser instead of just a dumbass...
rgs11 4 months ago
@rgs11 If you'd actually examined the evidence (which I seriously doubt you'll do, you probably refuse to take in any opinions that don't validate your beliefs), you'd see that there are very real reasons for asking serious questions about Ron Paul's racism. Obviously he's not standing there promoting genocide, but anyone who looks at the evidence and still holds Ron Paul on a pedestal is a deluded fool. The man is a creationist, and holds his libertarian ideals above the value of human life.
compactdisk2 4 months ago
@compactdisk2 You're an idiot... Make up your mind. You called him a racist with ABSOLUTELY NO evidence. It's because you have worthless ideas (if any at all) that you resort to ad hominem attacks against a truly honorable man whom DESPISES RACISM! You're a fuc(ing racist, loser...
rgs11 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rgs11 If you'd actually examined the evidence (which I seriously doubt you'll do, you probably refuse to take in any opinions that don't validate your beliefs), you'd see that there are very real reasons for asking serious questions about Ron Paul's racism. Obviously he's not standing there promoting genocide, but anyone who looks at the evidence and still holds Ron Paul on a pedestal is a deluded fool. The man is a creationist, and holds his libertarian ideals above the value of human life.
compactdisk2 4 months ago
@rgs11 If you'd actually examined the evidence (which I seriously doubt you'll do, you probably refuse to take in any opinions that don't validate your beliefs), you'd see that there are very real reasons for asking serious questions about Ron Paul's racism. Obviously he's not standing there promoting genocide, but anyone who looks at the evidence and still holds Ron Paul on a pedestal is a deluded fool. The man is a creationist, and holds his libertarian ideals above the value of human life.
compactdisk2 4 months ago
@compactdisk2 oh yeah and luckily no one (aside from your mid-brow pseudo-intellectual "comrades") is retarded enough to listen to your bullshit...
Seriously...
Get a life.
rgs11 4 months ago
@rgs11 Have you considered actually presenting an argument instead of just tossing off insults. I fucking hate when I try to bring up genuine points, and all people like you can come back with is "STFU! Stop trying to act so smart... you big dummy!" I don't get why people are so desperate to kiss Paul's ass. Yes, he's less of a shill than most republicans, and he at least stands up for what he believes in. It's just that what he believes in is complete dogmatic, anti-science nonsense.
compactdisk2 4 months ago
@rgs11 If you'd actually examined the evidence (which I seriously doubt you'll do, you probably refuse to take in any opinions that don't validate your beliefs), you'd see that there are very real reasons for asking serious questions about Ron Paul's racism. Obviously he's not standing there promoting genocide, but anyone who looks at the evidence and still holds Ron Paul on a pedestal is a deluded fool. The man is a creationist, and holds his libertarian ideals above the value of human life.
compactdisk2 4 months ago
It's way to late for Ron Paul to try to jet away at flank speed from all the neo-nazis, anti-semites and 9-11 truthers he's cozied up by the the burning cross with. Get you ass to the Libertarian Party Ron... Republicans rejected you soundly in 2008 and we'll do it again in 2012.
threeddd33 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I understand that Ron Paul doesn't want White supremacists supporting him because the liberal media will use it against him. But that shouldn't even be a big issue, the more support - more voters. As a racist I don't agree with his extremely individualistic and anti-racist standing, in that sense Jefferson was above him. But in everything else he's brilliant. Sorry Ron, David Duke and Stormfront (who are white nationalists, NOT white supremacists) already support you.
Dreamer00JK 4 months ago
I understand that Ron Paul doesn't want White supremacists supporting him because the liberal media will use it against him. But that shouldn't even be a big issue, the more support - more voters. As a racist I don't agree with his extremely individualistic and anti-racist standing, in that sense Jefferson was above him. But in everything else he's brilliant. Sorry Ron, David Duke and Stormfront (who are white nationalists, NOT white supremacists) already support you.
Dreamer00JK 4 months ago
Ron Paul is a republican so if he doesnt want racist to vote for him he will be missing out on half of his voters.
TheCaliCapitalist 4 months ago
I don't see why anyone would care that white supremacists support them. White supremacists are overwhelmingly against the Iraq and Afghan war... does that mean the anti-war movement is racist? People are such idiots. Ron, I know you're trying to win an election but don't take shit from the liberal hypocrites. You took Don Black's money and there's nothing wrong with that.
SkunkyAngry 4 months ago
remember to register REPUB if you are a DEM and want to vote Ron Paul. FL and many others are closed primary states so you MUST be a registered REPUB to vote Ron Paul in the primary -that 's where it counts because that determines the Repub nominee - NOT the Nov. election. Ron Paul CANNOT win unless he gets the REPUB nomination in the primary - please change to REPUB ASAP- do not get cheated out of your vote ,don;t let them cheat ROn Paul on a technicality
doogleandalix 4 months ago
I don't know why he would say he doesn't want their support. That's dumb. More votes and more money.
MrSafetymeeting 4 months ago
@MrSafetymeeting Because as he says" It would muddy the waters " - he doesn't want his good name tarnished with more rumors that he is a racist . He has enough good, decent people supporting him and he doesn't need or want to be associated with white supremacists.
doogleandalix 4 months ago
Multiracialism is a proven failure! Why embrace it? Where does multiculturalism work? Brazil?
NSMario1488 5 months ago
They all want Jewish Supremacist support though.
NSMario1488 5 months ago
1.) Why does he have White Supremacists support in the first place, 2.) Why will he keep their money, after saying he doesn't want their support, 3.) are we supposed to believe anything this liar says after realizing that: he votes no after inserting pork for his district (knowing the bill will pass even if he votes no), is photographed with Don Black, votes against donor identity disclosure laws so he can get away with lame excuses like these, and no one really knows where his money comes from
arcanedawn5 5 months ago
@arcanedawn5 he has support from everybody, even in the porn industry. you wish to label him as endorsing his supporters views.. typical "guilt by association" nonsense when clearly the man is all about people being themselves even when it's unpopular.
judoflipper98 5 months ago 19
@arcanedawn5 Judoflipper answered 1 & 2 for 3 it's playing the only leverage one can in a corrupted system. He represents people of his district that have had money forcefully stolen from them if he can't get something back for them or derail the bs crap what is the point of representation. If I took your money and punched you in the face wouldn't be nice to see that I dropped the money I stole when I was swinging my fist your way? I'd like to see my Rep do the same for me to derail or a refund
BrokenSentence 4 months ago
To answer your question kemetkush, it's because they're scared to death. The status quo is that conservatives keep them down with institutionalized racism. The war on drugs is a prime example and it works via stratification. The liberals keep them down because they need to keep them dependent as a constituency and don't want to lose the ability to manipulate them. Ron Paul would upset the whole apple cart and most blacks would finally come to see how badly they've been misused by the forces of
scburns01 5 months ago
in 1996 ron paul admited to writing the racist newsletters saying that he was "being quoted out of context",years later he retracted saying that he didn't know who wrote those letters,what a lying racist piece of shit!
geiuy 5 months ago
@geiuy that issue has already been resolved and it was a ghostwriter. nice try dumb ass. that was not ron paul as already proven. Obama ass is going down!
judoflipper98 5 months ago
@judoflipper98 listen,fanboy,i don't give a shit about obama.your idol made a LOT of money from the newspapers and the racist articles where written to he's name yet he couldn't stop the publishing of those degrading articles for years?r u guys serious?if a man can't run a newsletter how can he run a country?,u ron paul's groupie's can still vote for him even if u admit that there is something weird about this newletter's story,so stop looking like stupid groupies and admit it
geiuy 5 months ago
@geiuy awww some body is ass hurt. lol It was a ghostwriter once again and you fail. hahahahha
judoflipper98 5 months ago
@judoflipper98 if u had a hint of personality and self respect you would admit that there is something not quite right about the hole newsletter story,u can keep voting your idol but at least stop licking he's hairy old ass and be a little more of a man....think with your own brain
geiuy 5 months ago
"muddies the water"
subtle Ron.... subtle
SpiroHrvoje1989 5 months ago
why they are trying so hard to keep black-people, away from ron paul????
kemetkush 5 months ago
@kemetkush I've noticed that as well.
MrHATETV 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kemetkush in 1996 ron paul admited to writing the racist newsletters saying that he was "being quoted out of context",years later he retracted saying that he didn't know who wrote those letters,what a lying racist piece of shit!
geiuy 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL, WE ARE STILL WAITING FOR AN ANSWER! TELL AMERICAN PEOPLE HOW EXACTLY RU GOING TO CREATE JOBS? OK LETS SAY ALL TROOPS CAME BACK AND THEN WHAT? THEY ARE GOING TO SELL IPHONES AND BLACKBERRIES? DUDE BE A MEN, HOW RU GOING TO CREATE JOBS? POPULATION OF CHINA IS 1.4 B CHINESE WORK LIKE ROBOTS, BE HONEST TELL AMERICAN PEOPLE TO BUY UR BOOK U NEED CASH , U LOVE POWER, U LOVE CASH, U WILL NEVER CREATE JOBS, U HAVE NO ANSWER!
democratsaresmart 5 months ago
I hate when they make Ron Paul answer ridiculous questions. During the 2008 Republican debate they asked him if he believe 9/11 was an inside job (which it was, but Paul obviously can't say that out loud). They wouldn't ask any other candidate that question. The media does this in order to degrade him.
st1ckycheese 6 months ago
@st1ckycheese Exactly my friend! This is an old tactic used the left since the late-60s - heck, even Hitler used it. After all, he's the one that said "if you tell a lie often enough, people will believe it" and if you throw enough mud, some of it will stick. By asking Ron Paul questions like this, they're deliberately planting seeds of doubt in the publics mind. It's a sickening tactic and I for one will never buy that bs leftist propaganda.
matrix4022 5 months ago
@matrix4022 Hitler mentions that quote in Mein Kampf in reference to the Jews, and not to himself. That is one of the most famous of his quotes which is taken out of context to make it look like he had to tell lies to get into power. What he really said was that the Jews repeat the same lie over and over in the press and eventually it becomes a "fact" in the public through the process of repetition. An examples of this is the claim of WMD in Iraq - a war which was started by israel and the Jews
st1ckycheese 5 months ago
@st1ckycheese make a concious effort to vocally and in written form make a distinction between jews and zionists. If youre not aware of the dinstinction, research it. It extremely important
runelord37 5 months ago
Sorry Paul, your fan site Stormfront already supports you.
MaoistRebelNews2 6 months ago
Don't worry White Supremicists, I'll take your money.
InKa4484 6 months ago
I wonder if this woman asked al sharpton if he would make a statement that he didn't want support from black panthers, black extremists, black militants, etc. Did she ask Sotomayor if she would renounce all support from La Raza? This is a bullshit interview. Paul did not handle it well. What about womens groups demanding special affirmative action, does this woman renounce all affirmative action, does she renounce all womens groups supporting affirmative action?
mtx2200 6 months ago 31
I want Ron Paul's daughter to hook up with a black football player at college and then take a photograph of his face when she brings "Jamal" home.
Hypocritcal old cunt.
lostwisdom100 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lostwisdom100 wow you are a bitter loser.
JMS13579 7 months ago
@lostwisdom100 how did you like it when you found out your mother liked the black cock.
Kiddeth 6 months ago
i'm not really clear on his political motifs and beliefs but what he says here earns him a little respect for me. now i might change my mind when i do more research on him but at least he's not a white supremacist!
Maryyeung12894 7 months ago
@Maryyeung12894 there is not another candidate you should spend time researching over Ron Paul
JMS13579 7 months ago
RON PAUL 2012...that is the REAL CHANGE we all need!
dolfanlinda 7 months ago
@dolfanlinda David Duke as well
GiovannisSanctuary 6 months ago
this woman drills him on white supremacy but zionist supremacists are allowed to be in our political offices....why doesn't anyone realize that? There are few white supremacists and those that are have little power. there are many zionist supremacists and they are running the country. We must stop them. we must stand against their etnic cleansing of the Palistinians.
232323C 7 months ago
@hailourvictory Sorry, I am not an Obama basher but his lack of standing up to Israel's ethnic cleansing and letting netanyahu run shod over him totally turned me away from wanting to see him re-elected. he does nothing but bark on the very important issues....we need REAL change and that means a change in how america deals with zionism.....They practically run our country incognito and people like Obama allow them. He actually has them on his staff. no vote for Obama
232323C 7 months ago
I'm Hispanic, and frankly, I could care less who donates to the Paul campaign. If a white or another racial supremacist donates to to his campaign, they're probably going to disappointed if they think they're going to get a collectivist in office.
Ron Paul is a solid individualist
Keep the money Paul.
The establishment is going to try to bring you down.
You're going to need everything you can get.
Up with Property Rights
Up with Sound Money
Up with Our Constitution
Ron Paul 2012!!!
MsPROUDAMERICAN1776 7 months ago 2
id take there money and turn around and give it to blacks in the ghetto, they'd be so pissed
GunRyd3r 7 months ago
Freedom appeals to everyone.
Except communists.
acarlisl 9 months ago
If he does want racist voting for him or supporting him then he will miss a huge percentage of voters.
TheCaliCapitalist 9 months ago
@TheCaliCapitalist i dont think he will miss voters. A lot of Black people support Ron Paul more than many other candidates. He can possibly beat obama.
RobertsDigital 8 months ago
@RobertsDigital
A lot of black people probably do support him more than many other candidates. But then again most wont vote for him. The way the republican ticket is looking I dont think Obama is going to have any serious competition
TheCaliCapitalist 8 months ago
The reporters only job here is to tarnish his name by simply mentioning "White Supremacy". Ron Paul speaks the truth, and a lot of folks aren't comfortable with that. If you believe Obama (who I voted for) is telling you the truth, then send a message here; I'd like to hear positive and negative.From what I have researched, Obama has lied about everything he has promised. By the way, I'm not Republican, Democrat, or any of that.
444nice 9 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
If you believe in race, you are a racist. Race was created by elitist Europeans to divide the poor, create conditions for slavery so the people would be too busy looking at each other than the politicians and bankers who bleed them dry. If there is any hope for the USA, race most become obsolete and never used. ...if not, you'll fall right back in the same hole. ...or maybe cause another civil war. Race is not science, it's a lie.
Born2Flesh 9 months ago
Labeling Ron Paul as a racist is just a smear tactic by liberals and neocons.
AresCassell 10 months ago 35
This has been flagged as spam show
I like how Ron Paul doesn't participate in class warfare. What's good for America is good for blacks.
"Thy BlackMan.com" compares Cain to Paul and chooses Paul!
Google "Ron Paul & Herman Cain's Different Philosophies" by Staff
Re: Israel, Google "Are Evangelical Christians Warmongers" by Pastor Chuck Baldwin
vechorik 3 months ago
and no one else did? obama accepted money from the black panthers. what about "hate the gooks" mccain?
he didn't consciously take money from them or ask for it. money was given to his campaign for him to promote freedom - something we should all value.
by your rationale, should we all be condemned for using money that's been gained only through the killing of millions of people around the world? or that same money that has most likely been involved with drugs in in some way?
PrideComethB4theFall 10 months ago
@PrideComethB4theFall provide the proof that obama accepted money from the panthers
franks2732 10 months ago
@UBSCARED BULL! This is more fear-mongering liberal propaganda. Paul is against corporate capitalism and government intervention in the economy.
Racism will cease to exist when we ALL stop making it an issue.
PrideComethB4theFall 10 months ago
@UBSCARED You're laughable. :p
masterskyrunner 10 months ago
I hope that this guy decides to run again in 2012. If we can get a guy like him in office.... an honest man, a man that pisses off both democrats and republicans, a man that wants the U.S. to mind its own business........ that's the man that I'll vote for, and I usually vote Democrat.
beanio12 1 year ago
They attacked the short-lived European American Heritage Appreciation Association, open to everyone, by labeling it 'white supremacist'. It's sole purpose was to build one revisionist-history safe library in order to preserve America's politically incorrect past. They have and will continue attacking ANY white group whose purpose is white appreciation, communication and survival on the grounds of being 'Supremacist'. At this rate they won't be satisfied - Wait a minute. Just who are "they"?
1208mlassen 1 year ago
Comment removed
lomocan 1 year ago
Comment removed
lomocan 1 year ago
Unless you're willing to put your reputation on the line and say/show (with proof) in a public setting with legal/lawful consequences that the majority of the voters of the district he's in are all white supremacists (which to me would show you may be sincere, though probably misinformed), I think Ron is going to be fine without those type of people supporting him. Saying everyone in a certain place are of a certain ideology is easy to do with the anonymity of the web to protect you.
dimeuno 1 year ago
Liar. Period.
momoyera 1 year ago
@momoyera He's not a fuckin' liar, idiot. He's probably the most honest politician in Congress in the past 100 years, dumbass.
MoneysnHoneys 1 year ago 4
@MoneysnHoneys Yes he had a racist white supremacist news letter sent under his name for 15 years and he knew nothing about it... You need to be one brainwashed fucktard to buy this. .. He is a liar. Period.
momoyera 1 year ago
@momoyera dude it was brought up before, and shot down...they dug the issue back up for the campaign. Wake up.
kardentyrell 1 year ago
There should be an investigation into who elected Ron Paul to Congress in the first place. What percentage of his district is racist?
JimmyFormerMarine 1 year ago
So you would vote for Harry Reid, lol.
MidNiteR32 1 year ago
@MidNiteR32 Mitt Romney gets my vote.
JimmyFormerMarine 1 year ago
@JimmyFormerMarine why
rast123456789 1 year ago
@JimmyFormerMarine
Hmmm, didn't you say you are Anti-Racist? Mitt Romney is a Mormon. His church, (LDS) is know for it's racism towards blacks. Blacks were denied Priesthood up until 1978. Romney acknowledges that, but refuses to denounce his church's racism.
Youtube 'Mitt Romney on mormon racism'.
MidNiteR32 1 year ago
@MidNiteR32 I am a Morman, and a person of color. If you don't fully understand what your talking about then you shouldn't make these kind of comments. I am proud to be a Morman, but you couldn't pay me to vote for Mitt Romney. Much of the info you find on the Internet is false and inaccurate. Before you put down an entire religion, take time to find out about it. Unless of coarse you believe all catholics are rapist and all muslims are terrorists.
ikinessi 1 year ago
@ikinessi
Obviously you didn't understand my comment, I said the LDS has had a history of racism by not letting blacks take part in priesthood up until 1978. My main point was pointing out Mitt Romney's racism on how he refuses to denounce the LDS church's racism.
MidNiteR32 1 year ago
@JimmyFormerMarine a puppet of the american people which to me sounds like an elected representative
rast123456789 2 months ago
Ron Paul represents a red neck district in Texas. He says that he doesn't want their support, but without it he never would have been elected to Congress.
JimmyFormerMarine 1 year ago
@JimmyFormerMarine The obvious racist is you, considering how you label an entire town as you did.
didles123 1 year ago
@didles123 But it is true. Those are the people voting for Ron Paul.
JimmyFormerMarine 1 year ago
@JimmyFormerMarine Well, if it's OK for you to be racist and generalize as you believe it is true, then I assume you have no problem with, or are supportive of, any racism in Ron Paul's district.
didles123 1 year ago
@didles123 I am anti-racism. And I oppose the racists who vote for Ron Paul. And I would never vote for him. If I lived in Paul's district, I would vote for the Democrat, whoever that might be, just to see Paul defeated.
JimmyFormerMarine 1 year ago
@JimmyFormerMarine If you are ant-racism, why would you vote for a democrat? They're the only part remaining that still supports institutionalized racism which they sugarcoat with the title "affirmative action".
You don't make any sense. You have no problem discriminating against a race and region of people, yet believe others shouldn't do the same. I can't even debate with you on an ideological level because your beliefs contradict themselves.
didles123 1 year ago
@didles123 Because voting for a Democrat would be better than voting for someone with the views of Ron Paul.
JimmyFormerMarine 1 year ago
@JimmyFormerMarine Do you really even know what Ron Pauls views are?
rast123456789 1 year ago
@JimmyFormerMarine I love all races and I voted for Ron Paul. My best friend is black
rast123456789 1 year ago
haha, I can see by the comments all you "I'm not racist" while La Raza(The Race) The New Black Panthers etc. grow everyday in America and don't care if you call them racist. but fortunately I know that many white people aren't like this and we laugh at you.. and the mexicans and blacks laugh at you even harder!
GSG17 1 year ago
The lady looked really surprised when he outright just said, "No, I don't want their support."
Go Ron Paul!
smartbomb33 1 year ago
Ron Paul is not a Racists, but Racists did latch on to his campaign.
ProsperityGlobal 1 year ago
Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups rather than individuals.
By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called diversity acutaly perpetuate racism. Their obsession with racial group identity is inherently racist.
We should understand that racism will endure until we stop thinking in terms of groups and begin thinking in terms of individual liberty.
-Ron Paul
gonadcancervictim 1 year ago
Ron Paul is the only non idiocracy-like president. He doesn't dance around questions, he tells things how they are in an up front manner. How can we NOT be sick of our modern politicians these days, lets vote for someone who actually SAYS STUFF
Transfectingood 1 year ago
he just contradicted himself. not wanting their support makes more sense. while taking their money is certainly a plus, being associated with them is probably more negative than the money is positive.
googley3 1 year ago