there is a new peer-to-peer network called Global Herald Network that let people share information with peers all around the world. If you have a question, an opinion or something you want to sell, you post it on the network for your peers to find and read. This new peer-to-peer network is different, and its fantastic.
well subnetting is rather the better word since youre grouping peers into specific subnets creating peer2peer networks , so subnet is the word and subgroup is just a novice word for it !! very neat video !
I have a hard time with actual subnetting and came across your video researching the topic to help me learn more about it. I have two questions? Would your concepts of search algorithims becoming subnets themsleves exhaust the current ip address schemes? Would this also lead to people having only a dumb terminal(monitor, keyboard,mouse only)in their home instead of a computer to fulfill their needs?
Hi abomb. Sorry that I use the name "subnetting". The p2p subnetting that I talk about in the video has nothing to do with IP subnetting. What I was talking about in the video should probably be called "subgrouping" and is similar to "rendezvous systems" / "distributed hash tables (DHT)" but not the exact same thing. And such "search algorithms" if built the right way can handle many many billions of nodes so no risk of running out of "p2p addresses".
But of course, p2p networks usually run as "overlay networks" on top of some other network, usually the Internet. And the systems I have researched needs people to have real computers at home, not dumb terminals.
Now, what you are thinking of is IP subnetting. Among other things it means the methods we use on local networks that use IP (Internet Protocol) to split up different sections of our local networks to different IP number ranges.
And regarding running out of IP numbers: Nah, don't worry too much about it. We (humanity that is) haven't ran out of IP numbers yet and we have already built the IPv6, the new Internet standard. By the way, the current (old) Internet uses IPv4. The new IPv6 has so many IP numbers it probably would be enough for the whole galaxy or so.
My best tip if you want to read up on IP stuff is to try Wikipedia. I am pretty sure Wikipedia will have a whole bunch of very good articles on the subject.
Thank you for your response, David. Thank you for the clarification and pardon my misunderstanding of your research. I; for one, would miss having my PC anyways, LOL. I wish you great success in your research! I find it facinating that somebody like you is out there really pushing network communications to a whole new level. Thanks for the wikipedia tip and taking the time out to reply.
This was a good lecture. Even without slides you described things with clarity that I understood. What's so interesting about it the use of stand alone web applications that can communicate via software without hard architecture such as server or some type of device that tracks specific protocol interactions.
Hi AllKillA. Thanks. I was asked to come to that congress two days before that, so I had had no time to prepare slides. So I just did a short talk and as you noted I had to use gesticulation instead of slides...
The year after that I did a much longer talk (with slides), but unfortunately YouTube doesn't allow such long videos. So instead I have put that video on Google video.
You can go to my project web site and see the video there at "randpeer com"
there is a new peer-to-peer network called Global Herald Network that let people share information with peers all around the world. If you have a question, an opinion or something you want to sell, you post it on the network for your peers to find and read. This new peer-to-peer network is different, and its fantastic.
EyeCatchNews 3 years ago
well subnetting is rather the better word since youre grouping peers into specific subnets creating peer2peer networks , so subnet is the word and subgroup is just a novice word for it !! very neat video !
thejokermansending 3 years ago
I have a hard time with actual subnetting and came across your video researching the topic to help me learn more about it. I have two questions? Would your concepts of search algorithims becoming subnets themsleves exhaust the current ip address schemes? Would this also lead to people having only a dumb terminal(monitor, keyboard,mouse only)in their home instead of a computer to fulfill their needs?
abomb123456789 4 years ago
Hi abomb. Sorry that I use the name "subnetting". The p2p subnetting that I talk about in the video has nothing to do with IP subnetting. What I was talking about in the video should probably be called "subgrouping" and is similar to "rendezvous systems" / "distributed hash tables (DHT)" but not the exact same thing. And such "search algorithms" if built the right way can handle many many billions of nodes so no risk of running out of "p2p addresses".
davidgothberg 4 years ago
...continue 1, to abomb:
But of course, p2p networks usually run as "overlay networks" on top of some other network, usually the Internet. And the systems I have researched needs people to have real computers at home, not dumb terminals.
Now, what you are thinking of is IP subnetting. Among other things it means the methods we use on local networks that use IP (Internet Protocol) to split up different sections of our local networks to different IP number ranges.
davidgothberg 4 years ago
...continue 2, to abomb:
And regarding running out of IP numbers: Nah, don't worry too much about it. We (humanity that is) haven't ran out of IP numbers yet and we have already built the IPv6, the new Internet standard. By the way, the current (old) Internet uses IPv4. The new IPv6 has so many IP numbers it probably would be enough for the whole galaxy or so.
davidgothberg 4 years ago
...continue 3, to abomb:
My best tip if you want to read up on IP stuff is to try Wikipedia. I am pretty sure Wikipedia will have a whole bunch of very good articles on the subject.
Good luck with reading up on this stuff!
davidgothberg 4 years ago
Thank you for your response, David. Thank you for the clarification and pardon my misunderstanding of your research. I; for one, would miss having my PC anyways, LOL. I wish you great success in your research! I find it facinating that somebody like you is out there really pushing network communications to a whole new level. Thanks for the wikipedia tip and taking the time out to reply.
abomb123456789 4 years ago
This was a good lecture. Even without slides you described things with clarity that I understood. What's so interesting about it the use of stand alone web applications that can communicate via software without hard architecture such as server or some type of device that tracks specific protocol interactions.
abomb123456789 4 years ago
Wow, that's great explanation. I really like your gesticulation, it makes understanding easier.
Unfortunately you hadn't enough time to go deeper in material, or the wrong audience.
AllKillA 4 years ago
Hi AllKillA. Thanks. I was asked to come to that congress two days before that, so I had had no time to prepare slides. So I just did a short talk and as you noted I had to use gesticulation instead of slides...
The year after that I did a much longer talk (with slides), but unfortunately YouTube doesn't allow such long videos. So instead I have put that video on Google video.
You can go to my project web site and see the video there at "randpeer com"
davidgothberg 4 years ago