@bavwill NO! You are PART of the creator...which is consciousness. But, not OUR consciousness...ALONE. And not human's consciousness collectively. Because our's is finite. You have to include everything in the reality for it to be a FULL understanding of reality. Ugh....not easy to relate. That is why there is a "hard problem" of consciousness.
Ohhhh come on now. 3:13 was just plain rubbish. Tesla is the greatest scientist/mind ever. There is no doubt he is of higher intellect than Einstein and certainly more practical in his contributions. Now I must take a pinch of salt while i proceed to watching this.
@LucifersArgument But, there is where you have to practice relativity....Tesla's intelligence was RELATIVE to Einstein's. But, if you see it how I see it, they are simply parts of the whole. They each have contributed GREATLY to our understanding of "reality".
If we are in a digital reality, we should, by digital nature, see a lot of stuff that is EXACTLY the same. So why do we have evolution? My fingerprints are quite unique. My DNA is quite unique. My personality appears to be based on DNA. Digital systems inherently have logical flaws.. e.g. play any advanced strategy game and you'll eventually find a way to 'cheat' against your computer.
Wait, 1st of all sorry for double posting, secondly, how has it been 25 years, he said '92 and It's not even 2012, this makes me think he is a time traveler...
"Reality is an illusion, albeit a very good one." - Albert Einstien
If this is true then we are all figments of imagination, however if that is true, then reality cannot be illusory, we must be a figment of someone, or somethings, imagination, however if reality were an illusion then the being would have had to be of something else's imagination, and that of something else's, ad ifinitum.
He is saying that all this stuff is new. It is not new. If you study Kaballah, Gnosticism, Tibetain Buddhism etc... You will find that this knowledge is very old.
@TheWillwillwill i think what the difference is in what he is saying is 'new' is not the belief itself but the science he's backing it up with is new and is being discovered and worked on for the first time.
@JTPlaya22 I get that. I am just a bit cynical about how history is portrayed, because of the dominant religions and power structures that tell us what is true and what is not.
Dennis Stepehen's TROM ("The Resolution of Mind") highly complements the work reflected in this presentation. Also Nassim Haramein presents a fairly accurate overview of the "Construct". Okay to read about this, but much more life-changing to actually go and look for oneself, which is what we do regularly using R3X processes.
Thomas Campbell’s 'backdoor hack' approach to understanding reality is stunning and quite an achievement. However folks, there IS a FRONT DOOR approach to understanding reality which has existed for at least two millennia. Read the first two chapters of the Letter to Corinthians, the 46th book of the Bible (7th book of the NT) for the description.
im only 19 ive theorized plenty of these theories when i was 13 up until now before i knew about metaphysics. i've always heard it takes insanity to be capable of understanding what you dont understand
Ok so Buddhism is a religion because most people believe it to be so? Hmmm ok then is the Federal Reserve in USA Federal and is it in fact a reserve?? The answer to both is NO but wait umm u no most people believe it yea?? Strands of Buddhism sounds small and bifurcated rather splintered and disorganized-- But this is an incorrect characterization.
Buddhism does not believe in a supreme DIETY ( A God) Buddha never said he was a GOD nor claimed that you would go to Heaven if u good or hell if u bad. What he said was that in fact this purification of body and mind got u back to first base as the filters of ignorance must be discarded BEFORE we can even begin to discuss reality. That is science!
U dont have to believe to join u can have other religions the Buddha isn't jealous. He said don't believe me! Go and practice and find the truth for yourself. It's a systematic approach to awakening the mind so that u can become that which u truly are- No angels no demons no magical trees no talking serphants--
@fireopalmo No. Buddhists practice ancestor worship. Which explains their worship of Buddha....he was a real person. The "icon" buddha is his consciousness interpreted.
Umm yea never said nor implied that Buddhism was the only way and in fact i completely agree that it is not. But u say u no Buddhism is that true? Because u keep calling it a religion so I think maybe u don't in fact no about it at all- please tell me about it then
Buddhism is a system of purification based on cleaning the body and mind (lubing the machine) of organic perception--so that these great questions can be answered clearly. If u have a glass 1/4 full of muddy water and u fill the rest with sparkling clear water then the water is still impure is it not? Well thats the conditioned mind of most folks
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
My toe is this...There is a whole of stillness...call it the one dimension...Its a nuclear holocaust of bliss...then there is a world in a cycle. Those are the two worlds. Only the Buddhas KNOW stillness. lOl
Buddhism has gone through this stuff already...many of the topics are covered in depth in Buddhism and this would make a good reference point for all of you.
apparently, buddhism is the closest thing we have on this planet to the true way. (I'm not a buddhist by the way) but it does make a lot of sense. But religion has been bastardized so much by humankind over the millenia that now it has a bad rap,(i'm not religious either,,,but there you go)
Yes Buddhism has gone on to describe this stuff exactly! But references are tricky to sum and impossible to most. Even if ur bell of truth is clear and pure and rings out early and strong in the misty mountain air- Sum tard with a polluted body/mind wont get it or will simply twist it to fit their own reality tunnel
consciousness cant be understood objectively? maybe not by humans but by god. just cuz we dont know the answer doesnt mean ther isnt one. therefore everything has an objective reality
I am..:)
ThePastorGregory 1 month ago
@fourplusseven agreed. In order to understand the complete reality of consciousness means you must include all things. That's pretty fucking GODLY.
Kostly 1 month ago
Is he saying we are or rather, I am the creator?
bavwill 4 months ago in playlist Keynote-tom-cambell-monroe-institute
@bavwill NO! You are PART of the creator...which is consciousness. But, not OUR consciousness...ALONE. And not human's consciousness collectively. Because our's is finite. You have to include everything in the reality for it to be a FULL understanding of reality. Ugh....not easy to relate. That is why there is a "hard problem" of consciousness.
Kostly 1 month ago
David Bohm was a cool guy. He's got some amazing interviews on YouTube.
MikeRoePhonicsMusic 5 months ago in playlist philosophy
Looking to see how this might or might not mesh with Nassim Haramein's construct.
ckpeltomaa 6 months ago
Ohhhh come on now. 3:13 was just plain rubbish. Tesla is the greatest scientist/mind ever. There is no doubt he is of higher intellect than Einstein and certainly more practical in his contributions. Now I must take a pinch of salt while i proceed to watching this.
LucifersArgument 7 months ago
@LucifersArgument But, there is where you have to practice relativity....Tesla's intelligence was RELATIVE to Einstein's. But, if you see it how I see it, they are simply parts of the whole. They each have contributed GREATLY to our understanding of "reality".
Kostly 1 month ago
Free DMT for everyone!!!!!!!!!!
infinitesimotel 7 months ago
hee hee. I like the way he talks.
iamleothelioness 9 months ago
If we are in a digital reality, we should, by digital nature, see a lot of stuff that is EXACTLY the same. So why do we have evolution? My fingerprints are quite unique. My DNA is quite unique. My personality appears to be based on DNA. Digital systems inherently have logical flaws.. e.g. play any advanced strategy game and you'll eventually find a way to 'cheat' against your computer.
fasterfind 9 months ago in playlist Harvesting Souls
Wait, 1st of all sorry for double posting, secondly, how has it been 25 years, he said '92 and It's not even 2012, this makes me think he is a time traveler...
bane7667 10 months ago
"Reality is an illusion, albeit a very good one." - Albert Einstien
If this is true then we are all figments of imagination, however if that is true, then reality cannot be illusory, we must be a figment of someone, or somethings, imagination, however if reality were an illusion then the being would have had to be of something else's imagination, and that of something else's, ad ifinitum.
bane7667 10 months ago
The explanation of the Matrix...nice
horsinarounddoc 11 months ago
He is saying that all this stuff is new. It is not new. If you study Kaballah, Gnosticism, Tibetain Buddhism etc... You will find that this knowledge is very old.
TheWillwillwill 1 year ago
@TheWillwillwill i think what the difference is in what he is saying is 'new' is not the belief itself but the science he's backing it up with is new and is being discovered and worked on for the first time.
JTPlaya22 1 year ago
@JTPlaya22 I get that. I am just a bit cynical about how history is portrayed, because of the dominant religions and power structures that tell us what is true and what is not.
TheWillwillwill 1 year ago
Dennis Stepehen's TROM ("The Resolution of Mind") highly complements the work reflected in this presentation. Also Nassim Haramein presents a fairly accurate overview of the "Construct". Okay to read about this, but much more life-changing to actually go and look for oneself, which is what we do regularly using R3X processes.
ckpeltomaa 1 year ago
Thomas Campbell’s 'backdoor hack' approach to understanding reality is stunning and quite an achievement. However folks, there IS a FRONT DOOR approach to understanding reality which has existed for at least two millennia. Read the first two chapters of the Letter to Corinthians, the 46th book of the Bible (7th book of the NT) for the description.
DanSme1 1 year ago
im only 19 ive theorized plenty of these theories when i was 13 up until now before i knew about metaphysics. i've always heard it takes insanity to be capable of understanding what you dont understand
Zerobody 1 year ago
@fourplusseven You have spent all your time arguing about meaning.
jarfilli 1 year ago
so many concepts and so many conceptions about buddhism.
Live it, dont try to explain it, the Truth is within us.
shoshenkis 2 years ago
LOL, this physical and non physical stuff cracks me up.
rbolo29 2 years ago
Ok so Buddhism is a religion because most people believe it to be so? Hmmm ok then is the Federal Reserve in USA Federal and is it in fact a reserve?? The answer to both is NO but wait umm u no most people believe it yea?? Strands of Buddhism sounds small and bifurcated rather splintered and disorganized-- But this is an incorrect characterization.
fireopalmo 2 years ago
Buddhism does not believe in a supreme DIETY ( A God) Buddha never said he was a GOD nor claimed that you would go to Heaven if u good or hell if u bad. What he said was that in fact this purification of body and mind got u back to first base as the filters of ignorance must be discarded BEFORE we can even begin to discuss reality. That is science!
fireopalmo 2 years ago 10
U dont have to believe to join u can have other religions the Buddha isn't jealous. He said don't believe me! Go and practice and find the truth for yourself. It's a systematic approach to awakening the mind so that u can become that which u truly are- No angels no demons no magical trees no talking serphants--
fireopalmo 2 years ago
@fireopalmo well spoken my friend!
infinitesimotel 7 months ago
@fireopalmo No. Buddhists practice ancestor worship. Which explains their worship of Buddha....he was a real person. The "icon" buddha is his consciousness interpreted.
Kostly 1 month ago
Umm yea never said nor implied that Buddhism was the only way and in fact i completely agree that it is not. But u say u no Buddhism is that true? Because u keep calling it a religion so I think maybe u don't in fact no about it at all- please tell me about it then
fireopalmo 2 years ago
Buddhism is a system of purification based on cleaning the body and mind (lubing the machine) of organic perception--so that these great questions can be answered clearly. If u have a glass 1/4 full of muddy water and u fill the rest with sparkling clear water then the water is still impure is it not? Well thats the conditioned mind of most folks
fireopalmo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
My toe is this...There is a whole of stillness...call it the one dimension...Its a nuclear holocaust of bliss...then there is a world in a cycle. Those are the two worlds. Only the Buddhas KNOW stillness. lOl
attilaclark 2 years ago
As far as eternity goes ...its always now.
Buddhism has gone through this stuff already...many of the topics are covered in depth in Buddhism and this would make a good reference point for all of you.
attilaclark 2 years ago
apparently, buddhism is the closest thing we have on this planet to the true way. (I'm not a buddhist by the way) but it does make a lot of sense. But religion has been bastardized so much by humankind over the millenia that now it has a bad rap,(i'm not religious either,,,but there you go)
mattrix2007 2 years ago
Yes Buddhism has gone on to describe this stuff exactly! But references are tricky to sum and impossible to most. Even if ur bell of truth is clear and pure and rings out early and strong in the misty mountain air- Sum tard with a polluted body/mind wont get it or will simply twist it to fit their own reality tunnel
fireopalmo 2 years ago
by experiencing. you cant fully understand anything infinte though
joopq 2 years ago
consciousness cant be understood objectively? maybe not by humans but by god. just cuz we dont know the answer doesnt mean ther isnt one. therefore everything has an objective reality
joopq 3 years ago 3
how can god be understood objectively?
s1nks 2 years ago 2