Steel frame building 1.collapsed in 2.free fall, in 3.its own footprint, because of some minor damage and fire in some floors? Weeks later substance of Thermate was found there, and temperature in ground zero was very high, strangely also in WTC 1 & 2. If you have at look at this watch?v=972ETepp4GI and come again at conclusion that fire caused all this, it's you the one with lack of logic. I know it's hard to accept the truth, it was hard for me too and I still wish I'm wrong. With respect.
2. Free fall speed. Do you have a chronometer? Measure it, and the time WTC7 took to reach the ground was 6.5 seconds. The time an apple need to reach the ground is 7 seconds. This means free fall, and it's proven through math. Here you have physical formulas proving this, if you can understand them. (b i t . l y / 5KpEPS).
It is physically impossible for a building to fall in free fall speed without cutting the core columns.
Hmmm... In essence, you are stating that the building fell FASTER than free fall??? Are you serious??? Wow, So an apple would take 7 seconds and the building only took 6.5 seconds??? Again... Are you serious??? The quickest part of the building to fall took 8 seconds (this is the part of the building that had the first 20 floors removed) and the rest of the building an additional 7 seconds.
6.5 SECONDS????? That BREAKS the laws of physics!!!! Very stupid assertion you are making.
"Free fall speed. Do you have a chronometer? Measure it, and the time WTC7 took to reach the ground was 6.5 seconds."
are you aware of the east penthouse? most truther sites do not show it. it was part of the building. from the time it started to go down until the rest of the building started to go down is over 7 seconds alone. the collapse was not even close to free fall speed. again, truther sites ignore the east penthouse. but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. it does. no free fall.
The penthouse is 2.4% of whole building, the rest of the building felt with free fall speed. Here (b i t . l y / apmPH5) I made an image showing free fall speed for 111 meters of WTC7. Also watch?v=Ml_n5gJgQ_U
yes, which is why when you time the collapse, you start with the beginning of the east penthouse collapse. that's why the total time for collapse is closer to 14 or 15 seconds, not 6.8 sec.
"...the rest of the building felt with free fall speed"
no, only a 2.25 sec period appears to have fallen at freefall speed. just 2.25 sec, not "the rest of the building."
when you say minor damage and fire in some floors, where do you get that info from? were you aware there are over 35 quotes from firemen on the scene who ALL say the damage was severe and the fires were anything but small?
who do you think knows better? the source of your info (likely not on the scene) or firemen and other first responders who were on the scene?
"Weeks later substance of Thermate was found there"
not true.
2.25 sec of freefall, not the entire collapse. not even close.
Steel frame building 1.collapsed in 2.free fall, in 3.its own footprint, because of some minor damage and fire in some floors? Weeks later substance of Thermate was found there, and temperature in ground zero was very high, strangely also in WTC 1 & 2. If you have at look at this watch?v=972ETepp4GI and come again at conclusion that fire caused all this, it's you the one with lack of logic. I know it's hard to accept the truth, it was hard for me too and I still wish I'm wrong. With respect.
MyTiga 1 year ago
@MyTiga 4. symmetrically ****
MyTiga 1 year ago
1) Yes, it collapsed.
2) No, not in free fall. Very silly to say that.
3) It's own footprint??? No, it did not. The site was a mess.
Minor Damage??? Are you serious??? Wow...
Small fires??? The fires reached over 900 degrees Kelvin... Small???
I know it's hard to accept real information, but the shit you have been told is mostly bullshit or exaggeration.
gadget133 1 year ago 2
@gadget133
1. We agreed to this point.
2. Free fall speed. Do you have a chronometer? Measure it, and the time WTC7 took to reach the ground was 6.5 seconds. The time an apple need to reach the ground is 7 seconds. This means free fall, and it's proven through math. Here you have physical formulas proving this, if you can understand them. (b i t . l y / 5KpEPS).
It is physically impossible for a building to fall in free fall speed without cutting the core columns.
MyTiga 1 year ago
Hmmm... In essence, you are stating that the building fell FASTER than free fall??? Are you serious??? Wow, So an apple would take 7 seconds and the building only took 6.5 seconds??? Again... Are you serious??? The quickest part of the building to fall took 8 seconds (this is the part of the building that had the first 20 floors removed) and the rest of the building an additional 7 seconds.
6.5 SECONDS????? That BREAKS the laws of physics!!!! Very stupid assertion you are making.
gadget133 1 year ago 8
"Free fall speed. Do you have a chronometer? Measure it, and the time WTC7 took to reach the ground was 6.5 seconds."
are you aware of the east penthouse? most truther sites do not show it. it was part of the building. from the time it started to go down until the rest of the building started to go down is over 7 seconds alone. the collapse was not even close to free fall speed. again, truther sites ignore the east penthouse. but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. it does. no free fall.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago 9
The penthouse is 2.4% of whole building, the rest of the building felt with free fall speed. Here (b i t . l y / apmPH5) I made an image showing free fall speed for 111 meters of WTC7. Also watch?v=Ml_n5gJgQ_U
MyTiga 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The penthouse is 2.4% of whole building"
yes, which is why when you time the collapse, you start with the beginning of the east penthouse collapse. that's why the total time for collapse is closer to 14 or 15 seconds, not 6.8 sec.
"...the rest of the building felt with free fall speed"
no, only a 2.25 sec period appears to have fallen at freefall speed. just 2.25 sec, not "the rest of the building."
get your facts straight. accuracy matters.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@gadget133
It's CLOSE to free-fall-- i.e. within one second or so-- and therefore fools LAYMEN who have NO QUALIFICATIONS TO ANALYZE BUILDING-DAMAGE.
And since Truthers HAVE no such qualifications, then they are easily fooled by the speed of the collapse.
And the fires didn't reach 900 kelvin, they reached 900 CELSIUS-- which is 1173 degrees Kelvin!
The problem is that truth is stranger than fiction, but Truthers are drama-queens who THRIVE on fiction.
SovereignStatesman 6 months ago
when you say minor damage and fire in some floors, where do you get that info from? were you aware there are over 35 quotes from firemen on the scene who ALL say the damage was severe and the fires were anything but small?
who do you think knows better? the source of your info (likely not on the scene) or firemen and other first responders who were on the scene?
"Weeks later substance of Thermate was found there"
not true.
2.25 sec of freefall, not the entire collapse. not even close.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago 2
When you don't know what you're talking about, it's hard to know when you're finished.
tempest2s 2 years ago
Thanks for the constructive criticism... I don't know what it means, but thanks anyway.
gadget133 2 years ago