Interstellar space is filled with the remnant of decayed and decaying worlds. That evidence is in form of asteroids. Saturn's asteroid rings were formed when its gravitational force field subsided benearth the soil and the soil gravitated away since matter is weightless. This stament becomes evident when we transport an object having a considerable weight here on earth to some location in absolute space, it simply floats there and doesn't return.
The theory of the sun is wrong. Earth's sun is a planet's core in the making that consists of gigantic spherical magnes that are surounded by a sea of plasmatic ions which represent the founding block to all matter. Earth, as well as all other living worlds have such a core. When it develops a magnetite skin, it will begin to spew its contents and form feeder pillars upon which the substratum of its architecture develops. once that happen it will dim and will fail to stimulate earth's makeup.
A gravitational force field loop consist of 2 sub fields. One is an excursive field which repels other worlds and helps to establish their orbital corridors which impedes them from invading other world's orbits and therefore collision. The 2nd field is an incursive component known as gravity which serves to coalesce and unify matter toward a concentric point from whence it originates, and by the time that earth's gravity reaches that point, it does so with a force of 9,407,000 pounds peer sq. in
I've put together the universe (theoretically) since prior to the big bang and the inception of all that exists that is of nature, including the size of an atom and the fact that the atomic theory in not only an abstruce misconception that fails to advance student through its concept at a swift pace, and the fact it may be posible to produce matter in a laboratory.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Scientifically there are many errors in the talk.
They have been bought by some big oil producing company. There is NO plant free world, and the earths climatic cycles are NOT that easily predictable. We DEFINATELY have to stop emitting CO2!
There has never ever been more CO2 release. The graph the first dude is showing is simply made up. It is just NOT TRUE. They simplify way too much!
The whole reason for cutting back on CO2 is because of it's warming effects. Of course, we know that the the times in Earths history that have had the widest array of lief have been in times that were warmer than now. So, other than flooding coastal cities with five or six more inches of water, I personally see no reason not to continue as we have for at least a few decades longer.
No plant free worlds? Mars, Mercury, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, do I reall need to list them all?
@PaulUmbarger mercury is too close to sun, mars, too far, venus too close, jupiter too gassy, saturn same and too far like jupiter...null points, those planets were physiclly never capable of sustaining carbon based plants, maybe mars, if it had at one point had an atmosphere and effecient greenhouse exchange system
Interstellar space is filled with the remnant of decayed and decaying worlds. That evidence is in form of asteroids. Saturn's asteroid rings were formed when its gravitational force field subsided benearth the soil and the soil gravitated away since matter is weightless. This stament becomes evident when we transport an object having a considerable weight here on earth to some location in absolute space, it simply floats there and doesn't return.
Gravity is a loan to matter. jqs43@hotmail.com
jqs1943 11 months ago
@jqs1943
Yeap, Earth is in a midst of a cosmic shooting gallery once stated by Michio Kaku.
We should not put all our eggs on one planet.
tangel476 10 months ago
The theory of the sun is wrong. Earth's sun is a planet's core in the making that consists of gigantic spherical magnes that are surounded by a sea of plasmatic ions which represent the founding block to all matter. Earth, as well as all other living worlds have such a core. When it develops a magnetite skin, it will begin to spew its contents and form feeder pillars upon which the substratum of its architecture develops. once that happen it will dim and will fail to stimulate earth's makeup.
jqs1943 11 months ago
A gravitational force field loop consist of 2 sub fields. One is an excursive field which repels other worlds and helps to establish their orbital corridors which impedes them from invading other world's orbits and therefore collision. The 2nd field is an incursive component known as gravity which serves to coalesce and unify matter toward a concentric point from whence it originates, and by the time that earth's gravity reaches that point, it does so with a force of 9,407,000 pounds peer sq. in
jqs1943 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've put together the universe (theoretically) since prior to the big bang and the inception of all that exists that is of nature, including the size of an atom and the fact that the atomic theory in not only an abstruce misconception that fails to advance student through its concept at a swift pace, and the fact it may be posible to produce matter in a laboratory.
My email is jqs43@hotmail.com
Your comments are welcome.
jqs1943 11 months ago
First class presentation! Absolutely fascinating...
jjoneil73 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Scientifically there are many errors in the talk.
They have been bought by some big oil producing company. There is NO plant free world, and the earths climatic cycles are NOT that easily predictable. We DEFINATELY have to stop emitting CO2!
There has never ever been more CO2 release. The graph the first dude is showing is simply made up. It is just NOT TRUE. They simplify way too much!
maartsvenson 3 years ago
Comment removed
StevoDog21 3 years ago 14
The whole reason for cutting back on CO2 is because of it's warming effects. Of course, we know that the the times in Earths history that have had the widest array of lief have been in times that were warmer than now. So, other than flooding coastal cities with five or six more inches of water, I personally see no reason not to continue as we have for at least a few decades longer.
No plant free worlds? Mars, Mercury, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, do I reall need to list them all?
PaulUmbarger 2 years ago
@PaulUmbarger mercury is too close to sun, mars, too far, venus too close, jupiter too gassy, saturn same and too far like jupiter...null points, those planets were physiclly never capable of sustaining carbon based plants, maybe mars, if it had at one point had an atmosphere and effecient greenhouse exchange system
Fireball69 1 year ago