Starcraft 2 Brutal "ALL IN" (vs air) no glitch or mind control part 1/2

[ItsNeloPerez]

Would this work with spectrums!?!?!?! I dont want to start over (again)

[harrislam]

thank you for this. I've been watching other videos and found that the keys to easy success, planetary fortress, tech reactor, auto-repair etc etc were all out of my reach(wrong decisions in research), but still managed to pull it off with your guide after a few tries. It amazes me how smart your unit composition and your unit/bunker/turret placements are, my earlier tries were all lose to bad timing, bad building order on different bunker positions etc, anyway you have my thanks

[leoyungnew]

the repeated syllable adds to the effect

[Ryannsays]

thank you so much for uploading this! i finally beat it :)

[utdwcd]

Impressive considering you were constantly forgetting to make units and don't know how to use hotkeys. If you learned how to do that you might be diamond.

[kingkarloz89]

skill > graphics ;)

[whycanticomein]

OMG mass marine mass ghost mass SCV mass turret mass bunker :D

[whycanticomein]

OMG mass marine mass ghost mass SCV

[seheart]

holy shit your pc graphics are shit

[mrpatty29]

@seheart low graphics settings make performance better, and for missions on brutal and online games it is better to get the best performance possible

[paddyboyism]

it would be hard to try to do this level brutal with no upgrades

[choco8009]

this isnt brutal.... u guys got rickroled

[valezza1]

whats the glitch? The videos state that they're done without glitches, but i cant figure out what the glitch is.

[Azzwer]

Nice hot keys.

Btw, please start rallying your SCVs back to the mineral field. And why do you build like 3 bunkers witch you don't use? Fucking ridiculous.

[jerisiko]

i never play air this mission

[jshellz1234]

@Zefurion1988 Thats just hilarious. Half decent computers can handle intense games on ultra with ease. Heck, my five year old laptop runs ultra just fine.

[Dashawn628]

@jshellz1234 You're a liar. I'm running an i7 with 6 gigs ram and HD5870 graphics card and can only handle high settings without lag.

[Tripnotik25]

@Dashawn628 Depends on the resolution. I played the whole campaign on Ultra, while running a C2D E6750, an 8800 GT and 4 GB DDR II. Its all overclocked, but it doesn't change the fact that its a 4y old system.

Difference to you is that you proly played it at 1920x1200 or higher, i used 1680x1050, and the guy on the laptop proly even lower than that.

Cut rez, and you get fps, alot more than you would cutting some effect from ultra to medium or low.

[aaaaaFuck]

@Dashawn628

That's funny. I have a 5870 and a Phenom II and can handle it at 1920x1200 ultra with no lag (~45-60fps)

[Zefurion1988]

You idiots, every pro player plays with the graphics settings set to the lowest possible. If you were ever in a diamond match you would realize that there would be so many units fighting on screen that even the best rigs couldn't even run the thing without lag.

[Tripnotik25]

@Zefurion1988 TBH you're the only idiot here, when you state such things.

A said "pro", higher standards player, only gonna cut the gfx till he gets the desired FPS average, allowing for faster/fastest response. Ofc, lower specs, lower gfx.

You have proof all over youtube, just look around. There are plenty of diamond matches and at points, 400 units or so on the screen, and its just flowing like its nothing and on high to ultra graphics in alot of said videos.

So yea, get a clue mate.

[Zefurion1988]

@Tripnotik25 Whatever.

[PeskySaurus2]

@Zefurion1988 Uhm....... no. Considering I can run Desert Strike final battle without an inch of lag, you just need to get a real PC.

[messi996]

@Zefurion1988 what?! lol the best rigs could handle a 4v4 games on high setting without lag m8, maybe if there were a huge amount of "special" attacks (for use of a better word) it would lag but the current gen of pc run this fairly easily i mean my 3 year old min spec laptop can run this game lol

[Zefurion1988]

@messi996 Look what i mean to say is, if in a game you are playing vs 7 brutal enemies in a skirmish for example, at the late stage of the game they will constantly attack you with literally hundreds of units each, and you will often have to fight more than 2 armies at a time. With that many units on screen it is very difficult to micromanage correctly if you have lag, therefore in tournament matches the setting is reduced to the lowest to reduce the chance of lag...

[messi996]

@Zefurion1988 i agree but the pros play 1v1 not ffa, and no army in a 1v1 will make a computer that cost more then say 1500 euro to make lag(assuming you bought the right parts ) also pros will play it on certain setting because it will let them see stuff more clearly for example in wow i believe it was ensidia that release a boss guide for a very hard high end boss and said but settings to low as it makes it easier to see certain things and thus help performance, sc2 pros will do the same

[NwongD]

This strategy works, I've tried it out on brutal. Basically he had 7 bunkers filled with upgraded ghosts and 5 scvs repairing them throughout. So a ghost,marine infantry strategy works well as long as you deal with kerrigan and the broodlords effectively.

[Graham6762]

what is the glitch? dont rag on him he might be poor you jerk

[uberalex90]

LOL disgusting graphics, you should be ashamed of yourself.

[Aleksandr2975]

@uberalex90

In order to get less "mental lag" with your own brain during the important games and react and think faster, you should also learn this trick of using the lowest graphic settings possible as I do with my pretty decent graphic card.

[uberalex90]

@Aleksandr2975 how does that give you less mental lag though?

[Aleksandr2975]

@uberalex90

I am not a brain physiologist, I can't answer how

I played some custom map where I needed to explore with SCV and quickly react to the random units enemy and my response depended on the type of the units and on what the units are behind (like cloud of Brood Lords or so) and what the structures are there

So, it made the difference, whether I needed to make the extra efforts to recognize the image, or the image was simplified and easy to recognize. Half a sec here, half a sec there...

[Scarletraven87]

@uberalex90 Could you say anything more shortsighted than that? No.

[darkmajik23]

rofl the portraits dont even move!

[canotolto]

well done!

[shane87smith]

looks kinda like Age of Mythology with those graphics :)

[noobhunter4]

ew get a better computer

[mrnoob62]

massing rines and bunkers r good against zreg

[Oreoclan]

@mrnoob62 Not when there are OP Broodlords hounding your ass from all sides! >< That's the ONLY reason I chose to take out air on my first run of the campaign... Cause Broodlords are beyond annoying to deal with. Having Mutas out too just made it the most obviously easy choice... I think they should've left Mutas in the ground version so you can't go around with Banshees to pop Nydus Worms and would have to use weak ass Wraiths.

[yunusdinc]

its not brutal its fake where is tehe ULTRARISK ? its so easy

[mrnoob62]

@yunusdinc,lol,ultraseven appear in normal mode when you go against ground,but this is air....

[Scion160SA]

@yunusdinc He is playing this against air units not ground

[cruzifax]

no way this is brutal, no bunkers or anything goes down for him. 5 marines kills the first wave. this aint brutal

[MetalGuard3]

Respond to this video...

its deceiving but he has marines in a few bunkers early with the range upgrade. Also the first few waves on brutal are not that hard. and it was not only 5 marines... he also had 3 battlecruisers at the artifact until the flanking waves started to come

[Vivalavidapool]

I'm sure this is not butal, might be hard or normal, but defo not brutal, can anyone confirm?

[MetalGuard3]

@Vivalavidapool

@Vivalavidapool

It just doesn't look like brutal because all the ghosts with range upgrade plus bunker range upgrade rape over half the flying waves.

I just got my brutal achievement this morning using this

[TheJuston1977]

Can this be done with spectres? I have never tried using ghosts before and I am a little too far in to start over.

[TasoulisRules]

Amagawd... buy a new computer :P

[Dev1ned]

what if i have spectres?

[whodack2]

@MegaGrambo

Yes they can.

[Assault912]

why do you destroy the thing that hires mercenary? You shouldn't because without that thing, the whole thing is much easier than even normal mode

[mit871chell]

hey its starcraft 1 =)

[Assault912]

@mit871chell No its not

[mit871chell]

@Assault912 the settings are low, no shit its not sc1.

[HighterKite]

Please somebody post this mission without ghosts, mind control, planetary fortress, etc. Just marines, vikings and other normal stuff. I have lost too often this way, I give up...

[BlueDeathFire]

@HighterKite Ghosts are normal units and that's all he uses here. Ghosts, turrets, and marines.

[MasterHakari]

ghosts have bonus vs light, spectres don't.

[bta1987]

He is doing it the hard way with those ghost & snipes, which requires lots of micro. I can beat those broodlords easily with a team of vikings (fully upgraded), with barracks blocking the 2 choke points & some fire turrets & tanks behind for zergling it's super-easy. Kerrigan can be fucked easily with stimpack marines.

But honestly I think the air version of All-in is more messy to deal with than the ground version.

[TheJuston1977]

@bta1987 Wait a second, you go all vikings? I thought about that but, not sure. So marines and vikings and have the vikings flying all around the map? Could you clarify a little more what you did? I am so tired of getting owned in the 70's and 80's on the artifact.

[bta1987]

@TheJuston1977 Here's how: Keep a good team of vikings (at least 12) to get rid of broodlords (be alert, look @ minimap & response quick, save game often so u know where/when they will attack). Build turrets around artifacts. Tanks should cluster in the middle. Build barracks in front of the tanks. Keep a reserved team of 30-40 marines (to stim & fuck off Kerrigan), only 1 or 2 medivac is needed. You MUST use the artifact when the mass overlords come! Prioritize weapon upgrades to level 3 asap.

[bta1987]

@TheJuston1977 Btw, u should make about 20 more scvs to fully saturate the mining.

Also, having these armory upgrades will make this mission a piece of cake.

-Regenerative biosteel

-Structure fire automatically put out

-All viking/marine/SCV/tank/bunker/­turret upgrades

-Psi Disruptor (slowing nearby zerg units)

-Depot drop

-Automatic refinery

Don't waste money on half-ass units like firebat or marauder. They're cool but not for brutal mode. Marines/tank/viking ftw!

[Circadian781]

According to youtube's subtitles this battle is apparently an effort to stop the "serbs" form "overruning a suit"

lmao

[dvnrrs]

@Circadian781 yeah and Kerrigan has 4 kids, 2 emmys ( 6:48 ) ... xD

[BELATUBE]

why soo many damn scv in minerals? having 16 or 30 mining of 8 patch will will get same amount at same rate.

[Pacomanme]

@BELATUBE Actually 3 per mineral patch is optimal, so 24 would be the best number, but you have to account for needing to take SCVs away for building, repairing and such.

[Pisces3124]

@Pacomanme its actually 2 and 1/2 per patch, 3 is a little bit too many

[BELATUBE]

thank god my computer is bad ass n able to run with max settings . cuz that looks shitty .

[Hvisthule]

Why is Mathew so big ? he isn't that on my Starcraft2 :s

[Hvisthule]

@batasauk I think so, but going to try that out tomorow ;-D

[Dev1ned]

@Hvisthule and can spectres do the job ??

[MrMissingno]

Why is this in low quality?

[Kifitox]

whoa excellent strategy!! :D

[lol3ndir]

too much graphic usage on this map...yeah good style lowering the details ^^

[TheBlargenfarg]

why is it so hard to find part two vs. air

[reserva250]

@TheBlargenfarg Because siege tanks are OP. especially with the 40+ dmg campaign research.

[TheBlargenfarg]

2:01 "bawss!"

[DarkAJ89]

@TheBlargenfarg

Nice one for notcing thata, made me lol xD

[bearhuntaa]

nice. 2 CCs eh

[xxCastorx]

Excellent HD video audio quality with no commentary.