Added: 2 years ago
From: medinafortexas
Views: 2,185
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (116)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Funny how fascists always co-opt the word "freedom".

  • consensus among developmental neurobiologists that the establishment of thalamocortical connections" (at about 26 weeks) is a critical event with regard to fetal perception of pain

  • No he's not......he's a constitutionalist....you know, the constitution that you LOVE SO MUCH???

    How ironic you'd make a statement like that about such a successful man and a patriot.

  • Andrew Napolitano? You can tell from his voice he is poorly educated and is hate filled towards our country. What a sick citizen.

  • @maciindrew JUDGE Napolitano....he knows the law....which obviously you DON'T

  • Then why is he so poorly educated?

  • @maciindrew

    What a clone you are....do you ever have an original thought or are you so brainwashed that you cannot understand that the federal government is constantly over reaching it's authority according to the CONSTITUTION

  • Where has our government overreached according to the CONSTITUTION? I bet you can't name a single time.

  • Palin is smarter huh....really....she kept calling Joe Biden "obiden" so her advisors told her to just call him Joe during the vice presidential debates and she still slipped and said obiden. Real smart. Medina doesn't write on her hand OR use a teleprompter....OR say uh a dozen times between phrases like Obama

  • Mac if you were hardcore constituttionalist you would be applauding Medina....go on her website and study the issues....and as far as the economy she has a better vision than either one running against her.

  • You imbecile. Medina has a Nursing degree AND a business degree. How many do you have?

    Not to mention that she has created her own business.

    Think about what you say before you click on post comment.

  • @maciindrew Because Perry is a corrupt lying politician who is selling out the people of Texas....we don't want another slick politician....we want a citizen governor....get it now?

  • yes, all politicians from texas are corrupt... look at bush!

    i'm simply saying she is not well spoken enough to be considered credible. It kinda sounds like she only has a high schol education, and nobody would want to vote for that.

    Plus she is pro-life, so that is a HUGE strike against her... and she is pro gun, so again, nobody would ever vote for her.

    Are you poorly educated as well?

  • She has two degrees- a nursing and business degree.

    That she is pro life works well for her- the majority of Americans are pro life. Not to mention that Napalitano is pro life too- along with Dr Ron Paul.

  • I have a masters in economics, so that trumps any nursing degree.

    No, pro-life means she is out of touch with America, no female will vote for her if she has that "uneducated" stance.

    Yes, we all agree "pro life" people can't win, they are too hate filled towards society.

  • She has TWO degrees- in TWO different fields- so that trumps the dumbed down keynesian economics you've been "educated" in.

    PS- I'm a woman who'd happily vote for her. Most of the proponents of the pro life movement are WOMEN- many who've had abortions in the past.

  • PS- You sound very uneducated yourself. But then again, American higher educated has been in decline for a long while now.

  • killing babies isn't hate filled? Christians will vote for her and they are the minority.

    Economist degree huh....that explains it. Go count your beans

  • but nobody is going to kill any babies, abortion has nothing to do with killing babies... learn basic biology.

  • that is the most ignorant thing you have said so far....abortion is killing babies.

  • Incorrect, a baby isn't a baby until it takes its first breath, we all know that from biology courses. Abortion ends the growth of non-thinking tissue but no abortion has ever killed a "baby"... so quit being so uneducated.

  • You are a total idiot....a fetus is a baby....has a brain, a heartbeat, moves....and guess what if you don't kill it----it is born, grows and goes to college and gets stupider...just like you did

  • it's a fetus, it's only a "baby" after it is born... learn basic biology.

  • Mac...Pro life and pro gun is what Texans want...I don't know where you are from....probably California the land of Boxer and Pelosi.

    Medina is a nurse....she's no dunce and she speaks well....she did well on this video....what do you want a dramatic performance or a s__t eating grin constantly like Perry?

  • ruining families and killing strangers is what texans want? surely not. you sound like a wacko. i've lived in texas, it's a backwards state so i had to move to the mountains.

    medina sounds like a smoker that eats too many cheetos, no wonder she's dropping like a rock in the polls. perry is no better... texas never produces quality positions don't forget.

  • I thought you loved the constitution? The right to bear arms. I have a gun and I haven't killed any strangers....or anybody else. I have it to protect myself. Typical police response time is around 20 minutes where I live.

    Ruining families? If you have abortions there is no family. How would you feel if your mother told you she had thought about aborting you?

    Adoptions are a better option.

  • But a gun is the sign of a weak person, it's a crutch not a tool of a person who is in control. Guns are behind almost all of our nation's turmoil and tragedy... thankfully, only dumb people own them, so it's genetic cleansing... so Free Guns! for every Texan I say!

    No, abortions allow families to stay healthy and happy, if you outlawed them you'd have poverty and unrest. Let the MOTHER decide, don't take freedom away for your own sick, twisted pleasure.

  • Too bad your mom didn't have one....yep we can kill each other off with our dangerous guns and you can let the race die out by murdering your babies.

    A gun is not a sign of a weak person....tell that to the cop when he comes to save your cowardly rump if you get robbed, raped or kidnapped....or better yet call your abortion doctor

  • Napolitano is a SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, went to PRINCETON, NOTRE DAME LAW SCHOOL, SETON HALL UNIV. SCHOOL OF LAW......yes very uneducated....moron

  • He "was" a Superior Court Judge so get your facts straight.

    The fact he is a "Christian" and works for Fox News is enough evidence he is poorly educated... Very few people are that dumb & dishonest.

  • @maciindrew I saw her recently at a ralley and she spoke very well.... the crowd stood up and cheered at the end too....CONSTITUTION loving people-- which you are obviously not

  • Go Medina!

  • @zrzr4 ....AMEN ! I VOTED FOR HER TOO

  • Medina is a complete moron... she didn't act fast enough to repudiate people who thought 9/11 was some kind of "inside job"... only imbeciles would believe that, so it's scary she has people around her that believe in such nonsense.

  • @maciindrew

    Only a moron would accept the findings of the commission blindly...with all the blacked out text

    Answer this...why weren't jets scrambled to take out the 2nd jet hitting the world trade tower?

  • There were 2 investigations, so a 3rd one isn't going to change the outcome. Nobody is being blind, WE are the government don't forget, so there would be no motive to lie to ourselves.

    What? Nobody understood what was happening, so how could we have reacted fast enough? We first though it was a small plane, then there was a series of miscommunications... it had ever happened before so there were plenty of mistakes, learn to accept it...

    Quit being a "hindsight is 20/20" quarterback.

  • Nobody understood that planes were hijacked???, that's incredible! It's also false.

    There was plenty of time to intercept the 2nd plane but it wasn't done. What you are proposing is that our national defense is totally inept.

  • within the first hour nobody put all the pieces together, that's a well know fact... everyone was focus on the "first plane", had no concept of 2, 3 ,4... and if you want to blame our defense department, that's okay... but the FACT it had never happened before means it was outside "everyone's" perception...

    so again you are trying to play "expert" but with the complete advantage of 20/20 hindsight... that's why you are perceived as "uninformed" in your responses.

  • @maciindrew WHAT NEVER HAPPENED IS HAVING A HIGH RISE BUILDING COLLAPSE FROM A PLANE IMPACT....BUILDING 7 DIDN'T EVEN GET HIT AND WENT DOWN...AND THERE WERE EXPLOSIONS REPORTED BY FIREMEN AND POLICE....I'VE SEEN THE INTERVIEWS WHERE THEY REPORTED EXPLOSIONS PRIOR TO THE COLLAPSE

  • let's see... two 110 story buildings collapse next to building seven, a huge fire from a electrical substation built underneath it and enormous damage occur to it... the fire burns all day, and the building collapses...

    wow, i wonder why!

    sounds like you failed your college physics courses!

  • @maciindrew Show me one other building that collapsed from a plane crash or a fire for that matter with the structural capacity of the twin towers especially.

    If you think you know more than the over 1000 architects and engineers because of your college physics class that's insane.

  • no other tall buildings were built the way the towers were, nor were any other buildings hit with huge planes going at 550 miles an hour... the tiny little plane that hit the irs building in austin did a huge amount damage, so that's proof a huge plane could easily knock out each tower.

    and obviously i'm going to have more knowledge than 1000 faux engineers on this subject. but thanks for "trying" to make them sound credible.

  • @maciindrew B.S. NOT A HUGE AMOUNT OF DAMAGE....THE BUILDING WAS IN NO DANGER OF FALLING IN AUSTIN

    WHY WOULD YOU HAVE MORE KNOWLEDGE THAN ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS....WHAT EXACTLY ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT

  • oh, my... the damage was massive! look at it...

    snipr. com /ulqcc

    and a small, modern building with no static weight above of course wouldn't collapse... why would you think it would? the physics just aren't there.

    where are these engineers and architects? 99.99% of them aren't who they say they are... they are just haters of america like you.

  • @maciindrew Baloney....I love America....I just don't buy the secrecy our government consistently engages in. If what you say as far as WE THE PEOPLE are the government then why can't we have information and why do they classify everything of significance?

  • where has there been any secrets? the reports are all publicly available... nobody has classified anything, so it sounds like you are watching too many hate videos, not researching the publicly available facts.

  • @maciindrew not even comparable damage....a small craft doesn't have an impact of a jet liner...why even bring that up....as far as credintials you can look them up....Gage is a famous architect in San Francisco

  • @maciindrew  buildings don't collapse in their own footprint unless they are controlled demolitions....watch a few and see the similarity

  • with no force from any other direction, of course they would fall straight down... did you fail your high school physics courses as well?

    now you're just being dumb...

  • @maciindrew BUILDING TILT ONE DIRECTION OR ANOTHER WHEN THEY FALL UNLESS THEY ARE CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS

  • yes, and both building tilted during collapse, so that proves (according to you) that it was not a controlled demolition.

  • @maciindrew the CIA warned the Bush administration that there would be an attack by hijacked planes ....he ignored it. That came out so I guess you missed it. They even had a TV show with that exact plot months before 9/11....what a coincidence

  • warnings like that happen all the time, so which one are you going to believe? and yeah, clinton should have killed bin laden years earlier, but it shows as humans we don't have crystal balls...

    sure, it's EASY to say, woulda coulda shoulda... but the fact remains we are fallible... so trying to "make up stories" of how we "could have" stopped it... serve no purpose.

  • @maciindrew Yes the government investigations will all come out exactly the same ...private expert investigations are more believable and scientific

    ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH

    watch it

  • since we are the government it stands to reason they'd give the most accurate information. the A & T for misinformation was debunked years ago, nobody is going to believe those wackos. A few of them actually thought "explosives" were used... that's about as laughable as it gets!

    surely you don't believe anything they have said do you?

  • @maciindrew I GUESS OVER 1000 ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS WOULDN'T KNOW AS MUCH AS A BUNCH OF BUREACRATS WOULD THEY?

    FIREMEN REPORTED EXPLOSIONS....THE FILM SHOWS THEM IN THAT VIDEO

    NEVER IN HISTORY HAS ANY BUILDING COLLAPSED IN CONTROLLED DEMOLITON STYLE WHEN HIT BY A PLANE OF ANY SIZE

  • @maciindrew THE PRESENSE OF THERMITE ON THE GIRDERS IS A DEAD GIVEAWAY....FUNNY HOW THEY HAULED THAT OFF TO CHINA TO BE MELTED DOWN ALMOST IMMEDIATELY ISN'T IT?

    SUPER THERMITE CAN BE PAINTED ON ...GEORGE BUSH'S BROTHER WAS IN CHARGE OF BUILDING SECURITY??? STILL NOT CURIOUS?

  • but there was never any evidence of "thermite" found, so i guess that blows your theory...

    and george bush's brother was in charge of security at the world trade center??? wow! you are getting crazier and crazier! your insanity is now becoming comical!

  • @maciindrew

    There was evidence of thermite....watch the video I told you about.

    Bush's brother was in charge of security at the twin towers then.

  • the video never showed any proof, it just "thought" there maybe thermite, but today, we know it was not true.

    please cite the brothers name and the proof he worked at the towers, thanks.

  • @maciindrew MARVIN BUSH....THE PRESIDENT'S YOUNGER BROTHER WORKED FOR SECURICOM...ALSO THEY PROVIDED SECURITY FOR UNITED AIRLINES AND DULLES INTL AIRPORT

  • incorrect, he never worked for them, he was just on the board of directors along with several other boards, so for you to draw the line of him being "security director" of the towers is beyond laughable!

    thanks for the continuous humor!

  • @maciindrew BOARD OF DIRECTORS SAYS IT ALL....AS IN TO DIRECT?

  • but you said he was "in charge" of security at the towers, so obviously you were wrong. BOD members have nothing to do with day to day operations.

  • @maciindrew No they just decide how the corporations tell the peons to operate the corporations.....they DIRECT

  • no, a BOD member does not direct, they only advise.

  • Hee hee, then they would be called the BOARD OF ADVISORS

  • @maciindrew what an ODD COINCIDENCE

  • You are such a tool Mac....as if the U.S. govt. has never been complicit in false flag operations, black ops, and many other nefarious endeavors. You are so naive you must be very young....or simple minded

  • @maciindrew CLEARLY SHE SAID NO, THEN SHE SAID PEOPLE HAVE VALID QUESTIONS

    WATCH THE ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH VIDEO THEN TELL ME THAT INVESTIGATION WAS SATISFACTORY....YOU ARE THE MORON

  • @maciindrew SMALL PLANE....DID YOU NOT SEE THE FIRST PLANE HIT....IT CLEARLY WAS A HUGE PLANE

    You are pretty funny with your lame arguments. The small plane one is the most ludicrous.

  • all the news reports during that first 15 minutes were of a "small plane" hitting the tower... look it up.

    nobody saw the first plane hit on a national level... you are talking about 24 hours later when the amateur video was available... again, your cognizance skills are lacking.

  • @maciindrew B.S. I SAW IT ON TV....SO DID EVERYONE ELSE RIGHT AFTER IT HAPPENED....A SMALL PLANE DOESN'T MAKE A BIG HOLE SO IT WAS OBVIOUS EVEN IF YOU MISSED THE FOOTAGE OF THE PLANE ACTUALLY HITTING

  • from the angle of the tv stations it appeared as a small plane, sounds like you didn't watch it unfold like i did.

    face it, you are uneducated about this topic, so will you please do some research?

  • Beck betrayed us.

  • Please vote Medina. Great interview here by Judge. She offended me too for a bit but she's the best deal we can have.

  • I wish Rasmussen would call my land line. I'd let them know I already voted for Medina.

  • Don't believe the Rasmussen Poll at 6:24 because that poll only calls on likely Republican voters.

    Most voters are independent today, and like Debra said the turnout is 3 times more than usual.

  • SirFelix you are so right! I've been saying this for a month. The polls are going to really be questioned after this election, I believe.

    watch?v=5IZb7wyIxPY

  • We still have to get away from the 2 party system,

    Why can't we have multiple party system. We need at least 3 if not 4 different candidates. One thing that FOX will do, will acting in support for many of the important views still pushes the Republican party... This divide of American must fall... which is perpetuated by the corp media. Thats why Tea Party is the Tea Party not the pseudo-republican party.

  • We have to switch to a Parliamentary System if we want more than 2 parties... but of course that won't ever happen.

  • Debramedina for president

  • Say one thing one about certain peoples right to protest about 9/11 for full investigation, and then deny them the next day!!!

    Shame, you have left yourself down badly Debra. Didnt even need to support these people, just allow them their right to protest.

    You have only just begun and already behaving like them. Shame!!!!!

  • Why does the media use the Ramsmussen Poll? Virtually all polls done by newpapers and radio stations in Texas has Medina in the high 60%? Why Ramsmussen, when ramsmussen only calls PREVIOUS REGISTERED republicans that have LANDLINES.

  • Medina folded on behalf of all the damn neocons. That said, she probably deserves a chance over that empty suited slickster Rick Perry. Debra even signed Glen Beck's stupid 9/12 charter, but he set her up anyway on his radio show!

  • shut up troll

  • Debra Medina gained credibilty with many people, including myself, as a result of her recent interview with Mark Davis. One of the best things Debra Medina can do from this point forward is never to appear on Alex Jones' show again.

  • You mean the "Glenn beck Show"????

    If you meant Alex Jones, didn't know she was on AJ's show before........

  • The most recent time that Debra Medina was on Alex Jones' program was in mid January. Someone downloaded this program on YouTube. The title is , " The Alex Jones Show with Debra Medina 1-15-2010 Pt. 1".

  • I don't think Alex Jones will let her come in his show unless she appoligizes to him and his fan base. But as a supporter of both Medina and Jones, I still voted for her today because of everything else she stands for and so should anyone else who believes in the contitution and in freedom.

  • If that Democrat opponent, Farouk Shami, somehow gets elected, Texas is finished. Thankfully, Farouk Shami is way behind in the polls.

  • Okay, Is she battleing for a new 9/11 investigation, OR is she battling to get taxes under control in Texas.

    Pick and choose battles. If you spread yourself thin, you leave yourself open to attack, or are unable to mount an effective Offense.

    She needs to stick to her key points. Even if she doesn't believe a new 9/11 investigation, I know she wouldn't Condone the Arrest of any truther for speaking their mind.

  • @jclisn

    I admit that everything I hear from the judge sounds righteous. But FOX must have a plan to use him even if he doesn't know what it is he and he is non co-operative he must know it too. Keep an eye open for it sometime in the future.

  • Haritoma is absolutely correct! I like to think the judge is a straight shooter, BUT hes most likely being used by FOX as deep, deep cover whether he realizes it or not! I was so disgusted by Hannity and Limaughs reaction to Ron Pauls winning CPAC that I cannot stand to even hear their voices. FOX news attempts to choose our candidates by manipulation, and people have got to wake up to that! You CANNOT trust FOX news; it is a tool of the beast used to divide the people of this great nation.

  • ever seen "hacking democracy?" google it. it will open your eyes as to how us elections are run.

  • Fox shows the Lastest Poll numbers with Medina at 16%. This is NOT the latest and they know it. Latest poll has her higher than Hutchison at 25%! Napilitano is being used by FOX as deep cover. At a critical moment in the future he will be used to try and send Constitutionalists down the wrong path. You just can NEVER trust FOX or you are kidding yourself.

  • @haritoma bullshit, the judge is righteous

  • My husband, son, granddaughter, brother and I have all voted for Debra Medina. We have never been this excited about an election before. GREAT interview!!! GO DEBRA MEDINA!!!

  • Should people vote Medina - yes, and then hope she doesn't do to you what she did to people who want the right to question government, without prejudice.

  • That poll is only about 600 people and only people that voted in the last election. It's very biased, don't trust the polls, vote Medina!!

  • We're all behind you Debra!

  • SERFDOM (Debtors' prison) vs. FREEDOM (our inheritance bequeathed by our Founding Fathers)

    VOTE DEBRA MEDINA

    My wife and I have already voted. We are not leaving anything to chance. Vote early! VOTE MEDINA!

  • hanging zionist traitors is not anti-semitic ! got rope ?

  • thats how an interview should be done good job Judge!

  • if she wins, Texas will become the corporate headquarters capitol of the world, every one will headquarter there, including foreign corp.s, then Texas will become the biggest economy in the world.

  • it would force other states to follow suit or be left behind. Thats the point of sovereign states, they compete against each other with better wages and lower costs. A big federal government ruins all that!

  • does she even have a chance anymore?

  • Considering her opponents... I would think so

  • but shes at 16%. hutch is at 27% and perry is at 49%..

  • That poll is among likely voters. Likely voters as described by the poll are voters who have voted in prior elections. Considering we have a record turn out and the number of first time voters is up by like 300%, I don't buy the poll results AT ALL.

  • I wouldn't assume those polls are accurate!

  • @oceanhawk9 We can hope and do what we can to make it happen.

  • She's got a chance by ME!!! And I haven't voted yet!

  • Go Dedra!!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more