What is the 1st song of this video? not the partnership one but the song for the first actresses?!? it is beautiful and I have been serching for it but don't know where or what to look for! someone help me!
@fandejackson That actress is Patty Duke. She played Hellen Keller in The Miracle Worker. She was the first person under the age of 18 to win an academy award. She did an amazing job. Her co-star, Anne Bancroft, won best actress.
Claire Trevor is very lovely indeed. I love her movies so much. They are so hard to find. I have found quite a few though at lovingtheclassics I just googled lovingtheclassics after reading about them on another youtube classic (i think it was alan ladd)
Saw Precious last night.... Mo'Nique will likely be winning BSA this year. I also wouldn't mind Gabby Sidibe winning best actress. They were both incredible.
I can understand the love for Kikuchi, but I really think Catherine O'Hara, of For You Consideration, deserved that trophy. Out of the nominees I'd side with Adriana Barraza.
Could you be anymore stupid? Some fatass who can sing wins an Oscar...what sounds wrong with the sentence? She can SING, NOT ACT. Plus, she's already got the Oscar curse.
if the oscars go by the mentality that one great song is equivalent to an oscar, then they should of awarded queen latifah the oscar back in 2002 cuz she can sing and she also acted very decently in chicago.
this video was excellent. you got the moments that most of these actresses won there oscars for really. plus i love shirley jones llaugh on elmer gantry, classic. the only negative bout this video is that jennifer hudson has to be on it, how bout we pretend abigail breslin won it or rinko or adrianna
I thought it was great, but people got mad that she won because she role was very small..... and you know what I say... SO WHAT....it WAS long enough, and it was DAM GOOD. What do you think ??
People have been saying Julieanne Moore has the "Glenn Close" career; well respected actress gets a couple Oscar nominations, then her career kind of fades, and she never wins. I really hope that doesn't happen to Julianne.
this is a direct message to academy award guy: hi dude when exactly are you gonna upload your new videos with the other categories?? are you really preparing them?? because you have a lot of subscribers and you should please them with the videos you said you would post, don't you think? well I hope you do it very soon and very nice video the one with the supporting actress montage!
Yes, I am planning that, it's just that is not that easy. I don't like to upload videos with bad quality, or bad edited. I try to have quality videos. Now I am preparing The Supporting Actress montage, of the winning moments. While watching and getting the films I need for the Supporting Actor, montages. By the way, does anyy of you has The Subject Was Roses?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
These other nominated actresse's should have won. 1961- Judy Garland- Judgement At Nuremberg. 1962- Angela Landsbury- The Manchurian Candidate. 1993- Winona Ryder- In The Age Of Innocence 1995- Kate Winslet- Sense & Sensibility 1996- Lauren Bacall- The Mirror Has Two Faces 1997- Gloria Stuart- Titanic 1998- Brenda Blethyn- Little Voice 2000- Judi Dench- Chocolat 2001- Kate Winslet- Iris 2002- Meryl Streep- Adaptation
What does screen time have to do with the quality of the performance? That's just a cop-out. Brad Pitt had nearly three hours in Benjamin Button and did nothing with it. Bea Straight and Judi Dench had mere minutes and made the most of them. Dench was alright in Chocolat, but in that year she shouldn't have made the top 5. I like Bacall too, but it was nice for them to avoid a sympathy vote for once.
Why are you comparing her performances? They're in different years! She deserved for oscar for Shakespeare and she should have won best actress anyway the year before.
To all of you who sent me messages. I am preparing new videos. I did this one first, because I have all the videos from my old channel... I am preparing a Best Supporting Actress montage with the winning moments. After that I am also preparing and trying to get the Supporting Actor montage, and then the Supporting Actor winning moments montage. And the same for Actress and Actor...
To all of you people who like my channel. I have one confession. I am the person behind the SuppActress original channel. This SuppActress 2 is not me. YouTube deleted it. I just wanted to let you know guys, that I am not him or her.
"but neither one of you vote in the Actor's Branch of the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, and neither of you understand actors or acting at all." I think Penelope was excellent and deserving of the acclaim, but that is a stupid, stupid remark. I rarely agree with anything LickMyCuntMoFo posts, but to hold up the academy as some sort of ultimate arbiter of cinematic worth is idiotic. While I agree with their decision to honor Penelope, this video contains some crappy performances.
you are entitled to your opinion, however the Academy doesn't vote based on the populace's opinion, but theirs and the individual branches in each category who determine the nominations and the winners
I disagree with you outinsider....The Return of The King may not have won if it hadn't been a big box office hit, same thing goes for Jennifer Hudson's win.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What's political about a movie about a war that people wanted to believe in? Is that not like America in 2003 with Iraq? And Jennifer Hudson's win, Effie White is coveted role in show business. In Dreamgirls 20 + year history, it was calling to be made into a movie, and Jennifer Hudson performed fabulously in the role and deserved her Oscar. Not to mention, Dreamgirls coming out at the height of a racial/ political shift in the United States. Politics does not demean the excellence of a film.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
According to your opinion, yes she is. I for one thought that she 100% deserved her Oscar as she deserved every other award she got for her role as Effie White in Dreamgirls. And as much as one tries to cheapen that win with post-American Idol sentimentality, it really has nothing to do with that at all. Yes she is singing a good chunk of the time, it's a MUSICAL. When she isn't singing, she captures Effie's struggle very well and embodies her character.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It's funny how only a few people think she didn't deserve it, in the mean time everyone else thinks that she did. From a actor's perspective, Jennifer Hudson drives Dreamgirls, her characterization of Effie White keeps us interested in the film, is way more interesting then Beyonce's or Anika's, and becuase of her character had to experience a post-music trio career, the others were able to do it better and was inspired by her strength amongst adversity. Hudson deserved her Oscar alright.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I've been the theatre for about a decade or so. I know how to act on stage and on screen. I respect the hard work an actor puts into every role they audition for and get. I know how long it may take for an actor to get into character. I also know how a director encourages the actor to make the right choices for the character. I know how the film and theatre industry works. I also know and have a better understand of how the AMPAS works too. Jennifer deserved her Oscar.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ego is not preventing me from making a decision on how good Jennifer Hudson is as an actress in the movie Dreamgirls and why she won an Oscar for that role. All these negatives just show what little film students truly know about acting, because all they want is to get their egos in check to get behind the camera as soon as possible. In the meantime, seeing how I come from the other end of the camera, I know that Oscars are earned for one's hard work in their craft and that Hudson deserved hers
well, one, that's a rumor, which actually makes it uncredibile. Secondly, that is a biased low expectation of the artist and her craft. Thirdly, in regards to her craft, as an actor looking at another actor's performance, does she fulfill what a supporting performer is supposed to do in the medium? You have to approach it like an actor, not from a discredible press venue. Hedda Hopper may have appeared in a couple Hollywood movies, but that doesn't give her cred to the profession.
I think she's good when she's doing things in Spanish....I can barely even understand her when she's speaking English. And honestly, I really didn't like Vicky Christina Barcelona...she could have made much more of an impact in her role, I just didn't think she did.
I can understand why Viola didn't win, because no one reallys knows her...
Well, you are entitled to your opinions, but I do have a question for you. More like questions. One: if she is a supporting character and depending on the script, how much more of an impact should she have made with less than 40 minutes of screentime?Two: It takes a great actress to steal away the carpet from a leading star, to make people care more for her than her leading players. Did she steal away the carpet from Scarlett and Javier? Three: Does her character drive the picture?
cont'd: I mean, if the movie sucked, but her characterization is the only thing that keeps people interested, then that's something. A movie can be crap but one character can still keep you interested. Did she keep you interested?
Well, my smartass answer is based on my questions, what do you think? But, I'll list them.
A supporting player must fulfill a majority of these qualities: The performer must have made a considerable impact on the film given their limited screentime; The performer must steal away the interest that would go to the leading roles on them. The performer must drive the character they are portraying so well that it makes the film worth something contd
A good sign of a great supporting player is when the supporting player sizes up the lead in some effective way by their portrayal, and they are right about their observations. They are so right you depend on them in a way. Of course, that standard comes and goes nowadays, but that defines the classic Oscar deserved performances like Alice Brady in In Old Chicago, Fay Bainter in Jezebel, Hattie McDaniel in Gone With The Wind, Ma Joad in The Grapes Of Wrath, and Mary Astor in The Great Lie.
There is another good sign too, when an actor's portrayal just gets under your skin, and you enjoy it even if the character is unfavorable- like Gale Sondergaard in Anthony Adverse, Shirley Jones in Elmer Gantry, Angelina Jolie in Girl, Interrupted, and most recently, Tilda Swinton in Michael Clayton.
Do you always analyze performances based on their surface, or have you actually explored depth in your analyses? I would think someone so *educated* in film would understand how important depth is to an actor.
If you where trying to be sarcastic, the joke is on you, motherfucker. For one of my acting classes, we actually watched Vicky Christina Barcelona, and, we had to find Cruz's depth. Sorry! This could have been one great performance, but the movie was AWFUL, and Cruz was no better.
listening and memorizing Herle Haggard at teh age of 3 doesn't make you smart or educated. And getting into a pre-pubscent tiff simply because I'm questioning your intellect and you don't think I should( which isn't much of a sign of intelligence as it is a more of a sign of a four year old who always got candy and throws a tantrum when no one will give him any).
That is your opinion, that is his opinion, but neither one of you vote in the Actor's Branch of the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, and neither of you understand actors or acting at all. You may think you know, but you know jack shit.
It is a requirement that every Academy member see all the movies of the year so that they could make the nominations and determine the winners. I think in regards to industry politics versus global politics, it does tend to go towards the other one but that doesn't demean the value of the work. I don't think sentimentality plays a role in determining winners at all.
Also, I'm not judging you for thinking like that amateur, but I am saying that a little more education and less biased opinions might help you understand more about the Oscars.
And herein lies the difference. The public doesn't trust that actors don't know enough of their craft to recognize great performances that the public adores. If the Academy was meant to serve the public in their recognition, the Oscars and the People's Choice would be very similar and appease to the public's opinions on who should be recognized. But, no , it falls back to the actor, who I believe, knows well their craft to determine who deserves real recognition and who doesn't.
"The public doesn't trust that actors don't know enough of their craft to recognize great performances that the public adores."
I am not on the "the Academy is out-of-touch with the public" bandwagon. I wish they were more out of touch and occasionally voted for something outside of their comfort zone.
"I don't think sentimentality plays a role in determining winners at all."
How can you look at this list (or any other of the categories) and tell me that sentiment has no role?
I'm not saying that the Academy IS out of touch with the public, but they shouldn't accommodate themselves to please the public with their choice of winners. The Oscars are no different from any other public award ceremony, peers recognizing peers for their achievements. But, since the Academy does want to maintain influence, it does often nominate performers that the public likes to keep us interested.
Also, I might add that it really isn't about THEIR comfort zone, but yours in that respect. The Academy often recognized unrecognized performances by the public to question the PUBLIC's comfort zone and hope the public can inquire the reasons why they chose what they chose. To answer your question, sentiment has no role because it is not about winning sentiment, it is about excellence in their craft and the hard work the performers have taken in their craft.
Usually, the Academy recognizes performances the public does not recognize because they know the performers have challenged themselves beyond their comfort zone. The public doesn't recognize this because the public establishes the comfort zone. Sure, some of the winners are predictable in some years, but all in all, sentiment towards their profession drives their decisions, not sentiment toward their peers.
"Usually, the Academy recognizes performances the public does not recognize because they know the performers have challenged themselves beyond their comfort zone."
By comfort zone, I was referring to their preferred stock characters and genres: biopics, Holocaust dramas, drug addicts, etc.
I have no doubt that actors are best at judging their fellow artists. The problem is that when it comes to actual awards consideration, they pick the same kind of roles every year.
well, but that;s the thing though. Not every biopic wins an Oscar, not every Holocaust movie wins an Oscar, not every story of a drug addict wins an Oscar. The myths surrounding these conventions and how they are recognized are only just myths. I do think, however, that producers are behind a lot of Hollywood movies and they establish the conventions for the actor to challenge in their performances. The only way to change up the comfort zone established is to bring something new to the table...
The last part with Penelope's genius line is brilliant!
dizkidliz 6 months ago
Fay Baintier looked oriental. Theresa Wright was so...i don't know what the word is considering she's like 90 now...I would say beautiful/hot
okonh0wp 7 months ago
Marvelous video! My favorites are Kim Hunter, Eva Marie Saint, Sandy Dennis and Geena Davis. I can't picture anyone cast in their magnificent roles.
HugoBossSuperModel 9 months ago
great video
patriciaegeafansite 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Try online Latino women profiles rockmycity.info
alahakonsepala 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Low cost marriage service for you rockmycity.info
senurireka 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Latino Beuties are there rockmycity.info
kemasanuja 1 year ago
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned anything about the fix 1993 Oscars when Marisa Tomei won ahead of the 4 much better British actresses
gazzpash 1 year ago
@gazzpash thats because she didnt win ahead of the 4 much better actresses... Marisa was the best!
eastendersfreak91 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chat with Russian women ## gettop5.info ##
merrieminchewchd 1 year ago
whre is halle berry
alberthurt1 1 year ago
@alberthurt1 IT's listed supporting actress not Lead actress, Halle won the Oscar for Lead not supporting.
tiana1017 9 months ago
What is the 1st song of this video? not the partnership one but the song for the first actresses?!? it is beautiful and I have been serching for it but don't know where or what to look for! someone help me!
theflecker 1 year ago
@theflecker The very first song played is from the score to the movie Sneakers.
beekothefreako 1 year ago
and monique ???????????
represionado 1 year ago
and monique
represionado 1 year ago
Um, could we just pretend that there was a tie between Abigail Breslin and Adriana Barraza in 2006 for the award?
juancarlosojano 1 year ago
goldie hawn was amazing!
cuddlesfreeman 1 year ago
Signifcances- Hattie McDaniel- first black person to win an oscar
Miyoshi Umeki- first asian and still the only asian to win an oscar for acting
Patty Duke- first minor to win an oscar
Tatum O'Neal- youngest person to win an oscar still to date
Beatrice Straight- person with the lease amount of screen time in a movie to win an oscar (5 minutes)
Anna Paquin- second youngest person to win an oscar
:D
psycoman111 1 year ago
who's the young actress at 1:19 ??
plz
fandejackson 1 year ago
Comment removed
thedevmhs 1 year ago
@fandejackson That actress is Patty Duke. She played Hellen Keller in The Miracle Worker. She was the first person under the age of 18 to win an academy award. She did an amazing job. Her co-star, Anne Bancroft, won best actress.
psycoman111 1 year ago
@fandejackson Patty Duke for the Miracle Worker
Nues0302 5 months ago
LOL! Seriously loved Vicky Cristi Barcelona.
klickenpod 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Claire Trevor is very lovely indeed. I love her movies so much. They are so hard to find. I have found quite a few though at lovingtheclassics I just googled lovingtheclassics after reading about them on another youtube classic (i think it was alan ladd)
If you like Claire Trevor, then check them out.
a354174 1 year ago
HOLY SHIT! Anne Baxter was HOT!
ThatOtherGuy1100 1 year ago 2
PERVERT!
BitchErica1 1 year ago
Add Monique to the list I'd love to see her:)
jeomata92 1 year ago 2
I would like the names of the actresses. For about the first half, I have no idea who these women are.
CaptChaos1981 1 year ago
Find them yourself.
TheOscarFiles 1 year ago
@TheOscarFiles I shouldn't have to. You should provide them.
CaptChaos1981 1 year ago
Lazy....
TheOscarFiles 1 year ago
I'm just asking, but are your years in the description off a litte? I thought Penelope Cruz won in 2009?
AlwaysRandomGirl247 1 year ago 3
It's not off. Vicky Christina Barcelona is a 2008 film, NOT 2009.
Xmenfan246 1 year ago
Thanks. I was thinkin of the showing of the awards, not the film itself. thanks alot! ^-^
AlwaysRandomGirl247 1 year ago
Mo'nique was awesome. Will see.....
Valapaca 2 years ago 2
I loved it, but it seemed to get rushed with the last few.
I agree though, I think Mo'nique will be added to this list for Precious.
PhilipWunelle 2 years ago 2
Great!
SEJASAM 2 years ago
Saw Precious last night.... Mo'Nique will likely be winning BSA this year. I also wouldn't mind Gabby Sidibe winning best actress. They were both incredible.
DMProductionss 2 years ago 15
THANK YOU!
Glad to finally see someone who agrees with Mo'Nique winning.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 20
@DMProductionss U were right, she did win BSA
tiana1017 9 months ago
why is there so much hateful comments.
chinadollz123 2 years ago 2
What piece of music is this??
it´s soo beautiful :)
oscarestefano 2 years ago
Comment removed
xdanceintherainx 2 years ago
Soundtrack from "A Beautiful Mind"
goslar21 2 years ago
@oscarestefano from 1:37 to the end is from "Shakespeare in Love". It's called "The Beginning of the Partnership" on the soundtrack.
musicaltheatergeek79 1 year ago
@musicaltheatergeek79 On the - A Beautiful Mind- soundtrack
lotrfan8 1 year ago
No, Patty Duke is the best winner.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 7
Penelope Cruz was wonderful!
theschwartz18 2 years ago
Uh, no.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
TMTGeneralDeath 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
for me Linda Hunt is not that great
I always know while i saw the movie that she's a women by her voice
Raweetawun 2 years ago
Congratulations on being a dumbass!!
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
TMTGeneralDeath 2 years ago
You are the biggest IDIOT on Youtube. Please go to film school and quit being a black idiot.
Ta ta.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Comment removed
TMTGeneralDeath 2 years ago
Hahaha, stay in school, DUMBASS.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Comment removed
TMTGeneralDeath 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
She's a probably a fat virgin who's so ugly her mom wouldn't look at her face
eniben4 2 years ago
You're a dumbass.
BitchErica1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Agree
eniben4 2 years ago
I thought she was nom. worthy. Didn't deserve a win.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 2
Uhhhhhh...wrong
BSActress of 2006....based on the year it was released dumbass.... was cate Blanchett in Notes on a Scandal....
Far better than Kikuchi...aswell as Hudson ... Breslin and Barrazza were pretty good...but CB was the best
gotat4evs 2 years ago
I can understand the love for Kikuchi, but I really think Catherine O'Hara, of For You Consideration, deserved that trophy. Out of the nominees I'd side with Adriana Barraza.
isakborg88 2 years ago
You should also make montages for Lead Actor, Lead Actress, and Supporting Actor.
Xmenfan246 2 years ago
Um.. First of all Babel is a 2006 film NOT 2007. Secondly Jennifer Hudson deserved her Oscar.
Xmenfan246 2 years ago
Could you be anymore stupid? Some fatass who can sing wins an Oscar...what sounds wrong with the sentence? She can SING, NOT ACT. Plus, she's already got the Oscar curse.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 4
if the oscars go by the mentality that one great song is equivalent to an oscar, then they should of awarded queen latifah the oscar back in 2002 cuz she can sing and she also acted very decently in chicago.
corsy123 2 years ago
Yeah, right.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 3
Rinko was amazing!
ooks 2 years ago 2
Abigail Breslin is.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 2
y Abigail?
i though Blanchett in Notes.. was the best by a mile....Breslin probably third
gotat4evs 2 years ago
Comment removed
CherryDee18 2 years ago
Jennifer Hudson is the WORST winner EVER....
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 8
@LickMyCuntMoFo i wouldn't say 'worst', but cate blanchett should have won that year for 'note's on a scandal'
curlyman217 1 year ago
that was an awesome video - I really loved the closing sentence!
purelyshameless 2 years ago 3
this video was excellent. you got the moments that most of these actresses won there oscars for really. plus i love shirley jones llaugh on elmer gantry, classic. the only negative bout this video is that jennifer hudson has to be on it, how bout we pretend abigail breslin won it or rinko or adrianna
corsy123 2 years ago 3
hmm
What do people think about Beatrice Straight winning for 'Network' in '76?
Personally I thought it was a brilliant performance that absolutely breaks the audiences' hearts...
gotat4evs 2 years ago 4
I thought it was great, but people got mad that she won because she role was very small..... and you know what I say... SO WHAT....it WAS long enough, and it was DAM GOOD. What do you think ??
SexyStudChris 2 years ago
She deserved her Oscar.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 2
Jennifer Hudson was so fucking awful.
KadieMayBitch 2 years ago 8
She was a scene-stealer. She gives one of the best musical performances of the decade. Totally deserved the Oscar.
Xmenfan246 2 years ago
She can sing, even though she's an American Idol LOSER, and she CAN NOT act for her life.
She needs to just retire, or give her Oscar to Breslin or Kickuchi.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 8
@KadieMayBitch disagree very much
andrewdisney1 1 year ago
This was SO well done!!!
Dannycow3 2 years ago
0:51 , Masterpiece!!!!!!!
Duenderelojero 2 years ago 6
Anyone have any predictions for next year?
I'm predicting Monique winning for Precious.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Really? The one from "Phat Girlz"?
BillyL96 2 years ago
LOL! Yes.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Yeah I could see that. Kind of like Queen Latifah - showing natural dramatic acting ability, without shedding her street-smart style.
BillyL96 2 years ago
I wish Queen Latifah would do more drama, instead of her 2 dime "comedy" films.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
I know! She's very talented, and actually can act. I hate how they can give Jennifer Hudson a Oscar, but not Latifah. Damn.
Even though her part was small in "Chicago" was small, i'm still glad she was nominated. By the way, what's your ranking for 2002?
BillyL96 2 years ago
2002 is easy!
Streep/Moore (they both were excellent)
Latifah
Bates
Zeta Jones
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago 4
You know, I can't decide over Streep or Moore either for the top spot!
Streep and Cooper were amazing together, creating a wierd, but true love affair.
Moore gave the best performance of the film, and was incredibly heartbreaking. A very subtle, and nuanced performance.
I can't wait until StinkyLulu does 2002!
BillyL96 2 years ago
Me too!!
I'm somewhat thinkng Meryl will win a make-up Oscar this year for Julie and Julia....so far, the competition is extremely weak.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
People have been saying Julieanne Moore has the "Glenn Close" career; well respected actress gets a couple Oscar nominations, then her career kind of fades, and she never wins. I really hope that doesn't happen to Julianne.
BillyL96 2 years ago
I was kinding hopeing Blindness would be her ticket to the Oscars, but turns out, it wasn't a good movie lol
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
So far? We're only halfway through the year. The big Oscar films don't start coming out 'til late fall.
musicaltheatergeek79 2 years ago
This year is going to beyond SUCKY.
I expect the horrible musical Nine, to win Best Picture.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Out of two just these two Supporting Actress nominees in 1945, which would you have picked for the win?
Ann Blyth OR Eve Arden?
BillyL96 2 years ago
Ann Blyth
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Fantastic!
dog1cats3bird1 2 years ago
this is a direct message to academy award guy: hi dude when exactly are you gonna upload your new videos with the other categories?? are you really preparing them?? because you have a lot of subscribers and you should please them with the videos you said you would post, don't you think? well I hope you do it very soon and very nice video the one with the supporting actress montage!
JimmyCooper99 2 years ago
Yes, I am planning that, it's just that is not that easy. I don't like to upload videos with bad quality, or bad edited. I try to have quality videos. Now I am preparing The Supporting Actress montage, of the winning moments. While watching and getting the films I need for the Supporting Actor, montages. By the way, does anyy of you has The Subject Was Roses?
academyawardguy 2 years ago
Nice job. How did you get these clips??
Maladeisia 2 years ago
Can't wait to see the others!!
TheSuppActress 2 years ago 4
no for penelope :D
tracymariedion 2 years ago
Kim Basinger sure as hell didn't deserve to win over Gloria Stuart. Neither did Anne Revere over Eve Arden!
johnyzero2000 2 years ago 2
glenn close should have won 82 for "the worls according to garp"!
jessica lange is a great actress, but was much better in other films...
MartiniMitEis 2 years ago
This is a fantastic montage of talent. Worthy of being showcased of The Academy Awards broadcast. Thanks. I really enjoyed it.
TruthJunkieMikael 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
frodoireland 2 years ago
Uh, you've gotten must of these WRONG:
Patty Duke DESERVED her Oscar in 1962
Anna Paquin DESERVED her Oscar in 1993
Juliette Binoche DESERVED her Oscar in 1996
Judi Dench DESERVED her Oscar in 1998
Marcia Gay Harden DESERVED her Oscar in 2000
So, maybe you need to sat your mind straight.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Judi Dench ten minute performance in Shakespeare In Love!!!!!!! Judi was far more better in Chocolat which she should have won in 2000.
frodoireland 2 years ago
NO, Marcia Gay Harden deserved it in 2000. And Judi gave a great Supporting performance, hint why she won.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
What does screen time have to do with the quality of the performance? That's just a cop-out. Brad Pitt had nearly three hours in Benjamin Button and did nothing with it. Bea Straight and Judi Dench had mere minutes and made the most of them. Dench was alright in Chocolat, but in that year she shouldn't have made the top 5. I like Bacall too, but it was nice for them to avoid a sympathy vote for once.
MDSCFALNM 2 years ago
Why are you comparing her performances? They're in different years! She deserved for oscar for Shakespeare and she should have won best actress anyway the year before.
PadrethePio 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the new Supporting Actress channel!!
Go to my profile to watch all the performances!!
TheSuppActress 2 years ago
To all of you who sent me messages. I am preparing new videos. I did this one first, because I have all the videos from my old channel... I am preparing a Best Supporting Actress montage with the winning moments. After that I am also preparing and trying to get the Supporting Actor montage, and then the Supporting Actor winning moments montage. And the same for Actress and Actor...
Thanks for all the support...
academyawardguy 2 years ago
To all of you people who like my channel. I have one confession. I am the person behind the SuppActress original channel. This SuppActress 2 is not me. YouTube deleted it. I just wanted to let you know guys, that I am not him or her.
academyawardguy 2 years ago
To see all the Supporting Actress performances, go to my channel!!!
SuppActress2 2 years ago
"but neither one of you vote in the Actor's Branch of the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, and neither of you understand actors or acting at all." I think Penelope was excellent and deserving of the acclaim, but that is a stupid, stupid remark. I rarely agree with anything LickMyCuntMoFo posts, but to hold up the academy as some sort of ultimate arbiter of cinematic worth is idiotic. While I agree with their decision to honor Penelope, this video contains some crappy performances.
MDSCFALNM 2 years ago
you are entitled to your opinion, however the Academy doesn't vote based on the populace's opinion, but theirs and the individual branches in each category who determine the nominations and the winners
outinsider 2 years ago
I disagree with you outinsider....The Return of The King may not have won if it hadn't been a big box office hit, same thing goes for Jennifer Hudson's win.
These things today are entirely political.
TheSuppActress 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What's political about a movie about a war that people wanted to believe in? Is that not like America in 2003 with Iraq? And Jennifer Hudson's win, Effie White is coveted role in show business. In Dreamgirls 20 + year history, it was calling to be made into a movie, and Jennifer Hudson performed fabulously in the role and deserved her Oscar. Not to mention, Dreamgirls coming out at the height of a racial/ political shift in the United States. Politics does not demean the excellence of a film.
outinsider 2 years ago
Oh my lord....you just said JENNIFER HUDSON deserved her Oscar.
She won, because she was an underdog, or using my own word, loser, and the award shows thought he, let's change it up and give her all these awards.
She's arguebly the worst winner in any of the categories.
TheSuppActress 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
According to your opinion, yes she is. I for one thought that she 100% deserved her Oscar as she deserved every other award she got for her role as Effie White in Dreamgirls. And as much as one tries to cheapen that win with post-American Idol sentimentality, it really has nothing to do with that at all. Yes she is singing a good chunk of the time, it's a MUSICAL. When she isn't singing, she captures Effie's struggle very well and embodies her character.
outinsider 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's funny how only a few people think she didn't deserve it, in the mean time everyone else thinks that she did. From a actor's perspective, Jennifer Hudson drives Dreamgirls, her characterization of Effie White keeps us interested in the film, is way more interesting then Beyonce's or Anika's, and becuase of her character had to experience a post-music trio career, the others were able to do it better and was inspired by her strength amongst adversity. Hudson deserved her Oscar alright.
outinsider 2 years ago
outinsider, i've been a film student for 4 years, that doesn't mean I can't judge acting.
TheSuppActress 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I've been the theatre for about a decade or so. I know how to act on stage and on screen. I respect the hard work an actor puts into every role they audition for and get. I know how long it may take for an actor to get into character. I also know how a director encourages the actor to make the right choices for the character. I know how the film and theatre industry works. I also know and have a better understand of how the AMPAS works too. Jennifer deserved her Oscar.
outinsider 2 years ago
No, Hudson did not deserve her Oscar.
BillyL96 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes she did. And a small group of amateur film students and their massive egos aren't going to get me to back down from that conviction.
outinsider 2 years ago
"And a small group of amateur film students and their massive egos"
What was that about egos?
MDSCFALNM 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ego is not preventing me from making a decision on how good Jennifer Hudson is as an actress in the movie Dreamgirls and why she won an Oscar for that role. All these negatives just show what little film students truly know about acting, because all they want is to get their egos in check to get behind the camera as soon as possible. In the meantime, seeing how I come from the other end of the camera, I know that Oscars are earned for one's hard work in their craft and that Hudson deserved hers
outinsider 2 years ago
I love the last clip of Penelope Cruz in VCB. Because, all these performances are not only a sign of talent, but genius. Total genius.
outinsider 2 years ago
Yes...but too bad Peneople ACTUALLY WON. The fact is, she's terrible.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
I think you mean to say " In my opinion" if you are capable of factually saying those three words to define your opinion/
outinsider 2 years ago
correction: actually saying those three words
outinsider 2 years ago
Well, sorry to sound like such a bitch. So, do you actually think Cruz deserved it?
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
There must have been something about her performance that made the Actor's Branch vote so strongly for her.
outinsider 2 years ago
I've heard rumors she slept with Weinstein for vote blocking.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
well, one, that's a rumor, which actually makes it uncredibile. Secondly, that is a biased low expectation of the artist and her craft. Thirdly, in regards to her craft, as an actor looking at another actor's performance, does she fulfill what a supporting performer is supposed to do in the medium? You have to approach it like an actor, not from a discredible press venue. Hedda Hopper may have appeared in a couple Hollywood movies, but that doesn't give her cred to the profession.
outinsider 2 years ago
I think she's good when she's doing things in Spanish....I can barely even understand her when she's speaking English. And honestly, I really didn't like Vicky Christina Barcelona...she could have made much more of an impact in her role, I just didn't think she did.
I can understand why Viola didn't win, because no one reallys knows her...
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Well, you are entitled to your opinions, but I do have a question for you. More like questions. One: if she is a supporting character and depending on the script, how much more of an impact should she have made with less than 40 minutes of screentime?Two: It takes a great actress to steal away the carpet from a leading star, to make people care more for her than her leading players. Did she steal away the carpet from Scarlett and Javier? Three: Does her character drive the picture?
outinsider 2 years ago
cont'd: I mean, if the movie sucked, but her characterization is the only thing that keeps people interested, then that's something. A movie can be crap but one character can still keep you interested. Did she keep you interested?
outinsider 2 years ago 2
In your opinion, what should be the fulfillment or what do you think a supporting preformer is supposed to do in the medium?
BillyL96 2 years ago
Well, my smartass answer is based on my questions, what do you think? But, I'll list them.
A supporting player must fulfill a majority of these qualities: The performer must have made a considerable impact on the film given their limited screentime; The performer must steal away the interest that would go to the leading roles on them. The performer must drive the character they are portraying so well that it makes the film worth something contd
outinsider 2 years ago
A good sign of a great supporting player is when the supporting player sizes up the lead in some effective way by their portrayal, and they are right about their observations. They are so right you depend on them in a way. Of course, that standard comes and goes nowadays, but that defines the classic Oscar deserved performances like Alice Brady in In Old Chicago, Fay Bainter in Jezebel, Hattie McDaniel in Gone With The Wind, Ma Joad in The Grapes Of Wrath, and Mary Astor in The Great Lie.
outinsider 2 years ago
There is another good sign too, when an actor's portrayal just gets under your skin, and you enjoy it even if the character is unfavorable- like Gale Sondergaard in Anthony Adverse, Shirley Jones in Elmer Gantry, Angelina Jolie in Girl, Interrupted, and most recently, Tilda Swinton in Michael Clayton.
outinsider 2 years ago
To basically sum it up, Peneople didn't do anything except scream Spanish and kiss a woman. PERIOD
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Do you always analyze performances based on their surface, or have you actually explored depth in your analyses? I would think someone so *educated* in film would understand how important depth is to an actor.
outinsider 2 years ago
If you where trying to be sarcastic, the joke is on you, motherfucker. For one of my acting classes, we actually watched Vicky Christina Barcelona, and, we had to find Cruz's depth. Sorry! This could have been one great performance, but the movie was AWFUL, and Cruz was no better.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Actually I was trying to be nice. G-d you are such a baby!
outinsider 2 years ago
A smart, educated baby.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
listening and memorizing Herle Haggard at teh age of 3 doesn't make you smart or educated. And getting into a pre-pubscent tiff simply because I'm questioning your intellect and you don't think I should( which isn't much of a sign of intelligence as it is a more of a sign of a four year old who always got candy and throws a tantrum when no one will give him any).
outinsider 2 years ago
Listen, I'm happy with me life, and probably smarter than you in many areas. So, just drop it.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Whatever helps you sleep at night. To me and few other people on here, you are just compensating for your lack of cocksmanship.
outinsider 2 years ago
Refer to my screename.
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
Your screenname only amplifies my point.
outinsider 2 years ago
Comment removed
mickh18 2 years ago
That is your opinion, that is his opinion, but neither one of you vote in the Actor's Branch of the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, and neither of you understand actors or acting at all. You may think you know, but you know jack shit.
outinsider 2 years ago
Comment removed
mickh18 2 years ago
I don't put Jennifer Hudson with Dolly Parton and Steve Carrell, she has more talent than those two combined, not to mention, better screen presence.
outinsider 2 years ago
Comment removed
mickh18 2 years ago
It's not the fucking People's Choice Awards. and why are you channeling your complaints towards LickMyCuntMoFo onto me?
outinsider 2 years ago
Comment removed
mickh18 2 years ago
you don't see how similar you and him sound with your "arguments?"
outinsider 2 years ago
Comment removed
mickh18 2 years ago
It is a requirement that every Academy member see all the movies of the year so that they could make the nominations and determine the winners. I think in regards to industry politics versus global politics, it does tend to go towards the other one but that doesn't demean the value of the work. I don't think sentimentality plays a role in determining winners at all.
outinsider 2 years ago
Also, I'm not judging you for thinking like that amateur, but I am saying that a little more education and less biased opinions might help you understand more about the Oscars.
outinsider 2 years ago
"but theirs and the individual branches in each category who determine the nominations and the winners"
Yes, and it is their choices that we are critiquing.
MDSCFALNM 2 years ago
And herein lies the difference. The public doesn't trust that actors don't know enough of their craft to recognize great performances that the public adores. If the Academy was meant to serve the public in their recognition, the Oscars and the People's Choice would be very similar and appease to the public's opinions on who should be recognized. But, no , it falls back to the actor, who I believe, knows well their craft to determine who deserves real recognition and who doesn't.
outinsider 2 years ago
"The public doesn't trust that actors don't know enough of their craft to recognize great performances that the public adores."
I am not on the "the Academy is out-of-touch with the public" bandwagon. I wish they were more out of touch and occasionally voted for something outside of their comfort zone.
"I don't think sentimentality plays a role in determining winners at all."
How can you look at this list (or any other of the categories) and tell me that sentiment has no role?
MDSCFALNM 2 years ago
I'm not saying that the Academy IS out of touch with the public, but they shouldn't accommodate themselves to please the public with their choice of winners. The Oscars are no different from any other public award ceremony, peers recognizing peers for their achievements. But, since the Academy does want to maintain influence, it does often nominate performers that the public likes to keep us interested.
outinsider 2 years ago
Also, I might add that it really isn't about THEIR comfort zone, but yours in that respect. The Academy often recognized unrecognized performances by the public to question the PUBLIC's comfort zone and hope the public can inquire the reasons why they chose what they chose. To answer your question, sentiment has no role because it is not about winning sentiment, it is about excellence in their craft and the hard work the performers have taken in their craft.
outinsider 2 years ago
Usually, the Academy recognizes performances the public does not recognize because they know the performers have challenged themselves beyond their comfort zone. The public doesn't recognize this because the public establishes the comfort zone. Sure, some of the winners are predictable in some years, but all in all, sentiment towards their profession drives their decisions, not sentiment toward their peers.
outinsider 2 years ago
"Usually, the Academy recognizes performances the public does not recognize because they know the performers have challenged themselves beyond their comfort zone."
By comfort zone, I was referring to their preferred stock characters and genres: biopics, Holocaust dramas, drug addicts, etc.
I have no doubt that actors are best at judging their fellow artists. The problem is that when it comes to actual awards consideration, they pick the same kind of roles every year.
MDSCFALNM 2 years ago
well, but that;s the thing though. Not every biopic wins an Oscar, not every Holocaust movie wins an Oscar, not every story of a drug addict wins an Oscar. The myths surrounding these conventions and how they are recognized are only just myths. I do think, however, that producers are behind a lot of Hollywood movies and they establish the conventions for the actor to challenge in their performances. The only way to change up the comfort zone established is to bring something new to the table...
outinsider 2 years ago