It's hopeless to argue with christians who are born with this CEMENTED in their minds, what their gonna do is get pissed, look for information (in their favor) to come back with an argument. But they for get that they can NEVER answer the 1 question. CAN YOU PROVE THAT A GOD EXISTS?!
Why doesn't some ambitious person figure out the square footage necessary for a pair of all animals plus the space they would need to store the food necessary for however long they were supposed to have stayed afloat? Without doing the math I would assume that the arc must have been waaaay too big to be structurally feasible to build in wood, would have taken centuries to build, and of course impossible for one man to build. Put this mythology to rest. How can even morons believe this crap?
@55chh Darkmatter starts off with the food calculations. The other videos cover a wider range of evidence Cheers and enjoy! DarkMatter2525 watch?v=I225Vcs3X0g Jeffery FTW! brettppalmer watch?v=0GMmiq_ZHfY potholer54 watch?v=e5ElhX38w3Q watch?v=FfSvktyxVYA WildwoodClaire1 Pretty much all of Claire's science vids refute the flood, but here's two that deal directly. watch?v=d7vgqJOpKFA watch?v=McgGP32fvwU Gaz6231 Just deals with the Penguin quesstion :) watch?v=qZgbcuS25YI
Where did the water from the flood go? The Neptune Men stole it. Just like they tried to steal our remaining water and menace japanese children in 1961.
When making this argument, people often forget to mention human artifacts, which would sink to the bottom with the trilobite fossils. And what of pterosaurs, which could fly and escape the flood waters?
The rains went on for 40 days and 40 nights. The flood itself lasted much longer. I re-read the whole story yesterday arguing the absurdity of every other word in it to a theist.
I think athiests forget,no matter what kind logic,reasoning or evidence you bring to the debate, thiest play to thier trump card" God did it with his holy magic" so you lose lol
There's no argument required to disprove the flood/ ark myth. All that's required is to agree that koalas, kangaroos, and emus exist. How did these species make their way across a HUGE amount of ocean to the middle east where the ark was built - in breeding pairs no less? And most importantly: why, after the ark ran aground, would they ever bother with that long, IMPOSSIBLE swim back to Australia? They'd have stayed somewhere else.
@linkuei83 Actually, Conservapedia suggests that God may have used volcanoes to literally launch the little critters back to their respective continents. Of course, none of 'em were outfitted with fireproof clothing or parachutes for a soft landing though. That's good creation science!
@ChipArgyle holy tittyfucking shit! i forgot about that, but thanks for reminding me, what a great piece on creationist thinking, fuck airplanes, just mount a volcano! This kinda reminds me two more looney stories, the flat earthers that even deny gravity and that the light coming from distant stars doesn't count against 6000yr old earth cause god created it midflight. Should be a site for that kinda things.
@linkuei83 I've never heard of a gravity denier. They just think the Earth sucks or something? Why would God create starlight mid-flight? That would be a deception. It means their God's lying to us. If there's a God that lies to us to make us believe in Him, everyone should be turning their back on Him. It's pretty funny how deep into insanity believers will go to maintain their delusion.
@ChipArgyle think we do need a stronger word than insanity, from few of the videos i wathced -get this and sit while you read- the earth doesn't actually suck BUT the earth is moving upwards -YES LADIES AND GENTS- that's why we all stay pinned down... You should really check some of the videos, it's freaking awesome when they try to defend this. As for mid-flight light, well it's because they can't account how we see objects million of L-yrs away and still earth is 6000 old.
@linkuei83 That's funny. In order to be pinned down, we can't just be moving upwards, we have to be ACCELERATING upwards at a constant 9.8 m/s/s. Infinite acceleration requires infinite energy. Yeah, that makes perfect sense.
I know why the mid-flight starlight would be required to see it 6,000 years ago, I was just positing why a God would go to such great lengths to lie to us. Why would that God go to such lengths to pretend He doesn't exist?
@ChipArgyle I know, i got the same questions but you can't argue with a theist. They got the easy way out, god did it and what frustrates me more is that they wouldn't defend this if it didn't relate with the existence of god in any way as it's the case for other areas in science.
@ChipArgyle I know, i got the same questions but you can't argue with a theist. They got the easy way out, god did it and what frustrates me more is that they wouldn't defend this if it didn't relate with the existence of god in any way as it's the case for other areas in science.
@ChipArgyle So what those nutjobs do in essence is that they start from a conclusion and everything else is then distorted or even conjured up from thin air to fit their conclusion, and the fucking irony, they use the word, SCIENCE to gain a bit of traction, to piggyback into science's legacy, which of course it does in the minds of the sheep.
It completely BAFFLES me that there are people who actually believe in the flood story. It's such obvious bullshit that even a decently critical not to stupid child could poke holes in it.
And someone who knows anything about science utterly destroys such a nonsensical story.
If in the US many people believe in Noah's flood then that's all the more reason for them to start taxing the rich again and to spend that money on education.
Then there is the fact that dead bodies float for a while, then sink, then float again as decomposition causes gasses to form in the body, then finally sink after enough decomp has occurred.
1 male and 1 female of a species is a breeding pair, true, but it's not enough to repopulate because there is so little genetic variation that the offspring will become all fucked up. and then the species would cease to exsist.
for the record the bible says "two of every kind", not species. and im pretty sure that you actually do find fossils of all different kinds of organisms throughout the layers
@TheAtheistExperience Im pretty sure it doesn't say what it means exactly when it uses the word "kinds", but i would imagine that it probably would refer to all dogs being one "kind", for example. Anyways, to say that those biblical "kinds" don't exist in the real world without first knowing exactly what it means by "kinds" isn't really fair.
@JoshDec7 There are 8 million species on the planet. Species meaning cannot breed with each other. How is it that creationists who always say "I believe in micro evolution but one species turning in to another has never been observed" (which is wrong, but anyway..) account for that? You think Noah kept and fed 8 million species on his boat?
@66tomm99 I dont think that any organisms that swim would have gone on the ark, or even been killed by the flood. Also, it says "kind" not species. I don't know for sure but I think a dog, wolf, and coyote are different species but they can still breed with each other. So it would not have been necessary to bring a pair of each species on the ark, but a pair of each kind, which is probably why there are so many species that have gone extinct but are in the fossil record.
@JoshDec7 Not familiar with osmosis are you? Think about that for a little and then you might understand why that falsifies the flood myth. And I think we will need to look at flood basalts too.
@JoshDec7 And also for the record all "kinds" would be so incredibly inbred today that there would be little to no variation if there had on been a flood 4400 years ago.
Yeah the whole, "dogs produce dogs, cats produce cats" completely falls apart when you get to the finer points of evolution. Even the creationists have trouble sorting out the 'kinds' when it gets to that point, and get frustrated and say 'they are all animals, god did it!'"
if there was a world wide flood the fossils would all be on the same level and the fossils would be all the creatures that died in the flood. that is not what we see. we see layers with different creatures.
So with regards to these kinds... Noah didn't have to bring apes or monkeys on the ark then? I mean they are obviously the same kind as humans so they obviously evolved from humans via microevolution. Right?
I mean if tigers and housecats are the same kind, then obviously so is humans and apes. Right?
rofl looks like Jacob didn't really think this through. At some point he realized himself that this really doesn't make sense, but why not just give up on these fary tales and go for the truth. Much easier to argue if you don't have to fight against the facts..
You can hear the guy's brain shorting out several times during this call. It's pretty funny.
I wonder if Noah brought fish, sharks, and whales onto the ark? Two fleas? Two tapeworms? Two cockroaches? Two fruitflies? In no time, that would'been a MAJOR infestation.
One other point, if the water covered Mt Everest then the ark would have been floating around at 29000 feet, there is not a lot of air up there and its a tad cold, even today humans cant survive there for long without oxygen, so the ark must have carried a fair load of oxygen cylinders to keep that lot alive asw well as a heap of fire wood to generate enough heat to warm everyone up.
@mk2zakspeed Sorry to play devils advocate here, but if the water level rose to the top of mount Everest, then the oxygen level would also rise up as well. Mount Everest would become sea level and so the air pressure would be like it is here now.
that's not to say the the flood story isn't still supremely stupid! Even as a child I didn't believe it!
@dedokta, But are you sure, couldn't the water absorb the oxygen, and if you are right then the all the earths atmosphere would have been push further out thus effecting the magnetic field as well as effecting the moon, talking of the moon what about the tides on such a large lump of water. Mmmmm I am sure Kent Hovind has a theory on all this...................Ok Ok I concede you are right but you wont change my faith ...LOL ..:-)
@mk2zakspeed Dumping that much water in 40 days would have caused all types of crazy stuff to occur. the air would basically BE WATER from the amount of rain required. The oxygen level would indeed have been pushed outward as well. I'm not sure about the actual limits here, but this could possibly have led to air bleeding out into space, which would mean that air pressure would have dropped after ward.
Nothing about the flood stories make any sort of sense.
What I want to know is what happened to all that water, was it piped back up heaven and stored in a whole bunch of barrels in case it was needed again?. Or was the earth put into a spin cycle to dry it out a bit, its always bothered me where a few trillion gallons of water went
I wonder if this guy thought that all the dead and buried people from before the flood got up and ran from the flood. then reburied themselves on the new strata.
What bothers me the most is that the Bible specifically states that God hated the Earth so much he wanted to destroy all the life that he had created on it. So why destroy all life and yet allow one family to re-populate the exact same species that were there before God destroyed them? If we're talking about God here then none of the animals he created should have been allowed to survive so that he could create and completely new set of animals that he would like.
@dingodavid It sounds like he's going more for "the big strong animals stayed afloat longer", ignorant of course of the fact that we also find fossilized snails and mice and little frogs and insects at newer/higher levels along WITH dinosaurs, and megafauna, and protohumans.
Of course if his argument carried any weight at all, then we would expect to find ancient aquatic and marine reptiles like mossosaurs, plesiosaurs, ichthiosaurs etc in higher strata all mixed up with fossils of aquatic and marine mammals like dolphins, whales, otters etc.
@dingodavid Exactly. It reminds me a little of people who argue that all fossils come from the flood because they're always in "positions of agony", like they expect animal corpses to being lying on their backs with their paws or wings crossed over their chests, otherwise. I'm not sure if this guy's idea, or hydraulic sorting, is dumber.
I can't believe that in the 21st century, people still feel the need to interpret the flood myth literally, and use bad pseudo-science to back it up. I accuse these people of not really believing thse things themselves, but of only pretending to believe it for ideological reasons.
FUCK SCIENCE IN DA ASS WITH A PHAT DICK. ALL YOU MOTHERFUCKERS ARE GOING STR8 TO HELL ITS A BIG ASS LAKE OF FIRE UNDERNEATH THIS EARTH AND YOUR SOULS ARE THE MEAT BITCH. ALL YOU FUCKS NEED TO STFU WITH YOU MOCKERY OF JESUS I WANNA SMOKE ANGEL DUST AND GO DAVID KORESH ON YOU MOTHERFUCKERS ON XMAS AND FUCK'N SACRAFICE YOUR MOTHERS TOO THE SUN GOD SMOKE AND BLUNT AND PUT MY ASHES OUT ON YOUR CHILDREN.
Tell me Christian. What happens to salt water fish when you introduce massive amounts of cold fresh water??? They all die. What happens to fresh water fish when you introduce massive amounts of cold fresh water and salt water? THEY ALL DIE!!
So. The flood kills EVERY fish in the ocean, every mammal on land, and the disease from all the dead would contaminate the oceans, rivers, lakes and kill everything else that “survived”.
Another crazy caller that has not done any research. Just like 99% of creationists they don't really care to know the truth and when you hit them with it they refuse to acknowledge it and quickly change the subject. Even if I just arrived on this planet and one group showed me a Bible with claims and the other showed me libraries after libraries filled with research I would have enough common sense to side with the scientific research hello!
Why don't we find skeletons of, let's say, kangaroos that died while hopping back all the way to Australia from mount Ararat? It must have taken them a very long time and quite a few generations. Any kangaroo' skeletons found in Turkey? :))
....I believe this man has some "magical scientific" answer to this....and I do not want to hear it ))
Honestly, I don't how that guy could possibly think that he's argument is so effective that it's worth some consideration by those atheists. C'mon, people can't be this dumb.
@bgiv2010 The problem is many creationists insist the earth's sedimentary layers are from Noah's farce. So everything in those layers was alive when the rain started.
@InternetDarkLord Right but what about things that were no longer alive before the flood? I was just pointing out that both the hosts and the caller seemed to think that there were no extinctions before the flood, such that, assuming Noah did a perfect job of gathering two (sometimes seven) of every species, there were no losses between the beginning of time and the end of the flood. I just think that this is unlikely...or, at least, should be acknowledge.
@bgiv2010 Well, if the creationist insists that the earth's sedimentary layers were laid down by Noah's Farce, they are still stuck with everything in the geologic column, like all known dinosaur species. They could try to claim some sedimentary rock is not from the flood, by that creates new problems, like "Which layers are flood layers? How do you know which is which? If layers can be formed without floods, why any of them at all?"
there are turtles fossilized from the age of the dinosaurs, and below that there are fossilized very agile mammal-like creatures similar to possums and the such, these would have easily outrun the turtles that are found above them. This whole argument is based on an assumption that isn't true.
Ok, once again why is there minimum levels of thought prepossessing here. there are single layers of fossils in one spot! are you ready? its call petroleum! wow ! how hard was that? you guys try disproving the bible while ignoring scientific evidence that proves events in the bible? care to explain why? by the way if your answer takes more then one day, it proves obvious that you are desperately researching a rebuttal . regardless this is very amusing! LOL!!!
@1AD76 Google K-T Boundary, think about how Genesis says that a sky wizard magically created all land animals (including human) on the same day, and you'll stop with the LOL and feel foolish.
Genesis is wrong by well over 65 million years.
Earth created before stars? Hubble telescope proves that to be nonsense too.
Witches should be killed? WITCHES? How delusional do you have to be to buy that bullshit?
Bible = Provably false myth.
Face it. You have no invisible friends with "powers".
...soooooo, every single human outlasted every single dinosaur. Even the crippled one, the old ones, the ones who were sleeping in caves when the water came up, and the 2-year-old children. They all still stayed alive until the very last brachiosaurus breathed its last breath.
And FUCK YOU, Firefox spell-check, I do NOT mean "brontosaurus". Add to dictionary.
What excatly did the flood accomplish to get rid of the sinners? Only to repopulate the world with more sinners...to eventually destroy the world again ...excellent plan.How about after flood flood turn the earth back into the garden of eden and either completely remove the evil nature from them?
True, I was merely refering to him actualy having a coherent argument, his public speaking skills (does phone count as public speaking?) need work, but he wasn't just pulling the Old "Its in the Bible so its true" or "I beleive it so its true" stuff we are used to hearing.
One thing that is not often brought up, I guess because the theist has allready been buried by logic like, with all the Animals on an Ark, what of the specialised food required and some animals will only eat freash.
How about the excuse they were babies and eggs. We now know many animals learn to survive, hunt, feed, migrate, nest, mate by learning from thier parents. How would they survive without parents. Also minimum weaning ages means some not so small. Still don't fit by a mile.
Don't you know? Te weight of the land caused so much pressure that it pushed the water right to the moon!!! LMAO Maybe the fossils went with it!...... ROFL.... The very first monkeys in space.....Bwahahahahaha!!!
"Atheism is so senseless. When I look at the solar system, I see the earth at the right distance from the sun to receive the proper amounts of heat and light. This did not happen by chance." Sir Isaac Newton
Newton lived before we knew anything of radiation or how atoms work so why should we accept that statement as any sort of fact? Albert Einstein deneid quantum physics and we know them now to be as valid as regular physics. You fail tremendously.
- "Hey this is for all the athiest out there!!! I would rather belive in god and be wrong then not belive in him and be wrong! Because if you belived in him and was wrong nothing would happen you'd just rot in the ground! but if you didnt belive in him and you were wrong you're gonna suffer in hell forever!! now you pick what path to take!!!!"
It is every "kind"... but still dinosaurs would have to go on the ark... even in job there is reference to dinosaurs and the stories according to theologians were timewise around the same time... so the Bible makes claims dinosaurs would have to be on the ark and existed with humans so his claim of fossil record to prove flood doesn't Float (haha a pun)
@ColbyFoote it is mentioned in Job 40:15 as Behemoth, theologians make claims this is a reference to a plant eating dinosaur and also in Job 41:1 as leviathan, which they claim as a type of fire breathing dragon. Not all claim this exact interpretation/translation but many who claim young earth especially those who agree that dinosaurs and humans lived together do.
@ashleysloop A Behemoth is defined as a large animal or entity. It's a serious stretch to call that a dinosaur. The bible was written before people knew anything about dinosaurs. Hard to believe that humans and dinosaurs lived at the same time, especially when fossil evidence tells us humans have only been around for about 70,000 years, while dinosaurs died out around 60 Million years ago. I'll take that over some interpretation of an ancient book any day.
This lady here doesn't realize the falsity of her logic. If noah took only 2 or 7 of every animal on the planet, of course there would be fossil remains of all animals that existed at that time. Of course they would all be jumbled together in a specific layer. But they sure did flabbergast the caller.:D I believe that a bad flood may have happened (historical records, existence in other religions), but not anywhere near the strength of the bible's flood. lol
@NaomiSlverflame so basically you have made up your own religion, that does not rely on the bible. Congrats! You are now a false prophet according to wichever god you believe in, and according to your religion you will burn in hell.
Or, you are simply wrong and your god dont exist. Wich is more likely?
@MagnusNyborg no, no. I'm an atheist/non-theist. I'm just saying that the lady wasn't thinking when she said there wouldn't be any fossil remains/extinct species if noah took 2or7 of every animal onto his boat. Billions upon billions of animals still would've died if the biblical flood actually occurred.
I'm not sure where you think i've made up my own religion? Believing a flood of some type occured doesn't mean i have my own religion, and the rest of your statement doesn't make any sense..
@NaomiSlverflame sorry, i misunderstood your words 'This lady here doesn't realize the falsity of her logic' as being Tracy's logic being falsified. againg, my fault, sorry.
@MagnusNyborg nah, it was just that one line. I'd've said, maybe, "why aren't the fossils all jumbled up in one layer, if everything died at the same time? Something about the different types of stone and if so much died at once wouldn't they be in the same kind of earth/dirt/stone." The rest of the video was good.
well i dont think the flood isnt real because even in my culture there is a story of a great flood. and its not a religous story, its history passed down not that this has anything to do with Noah. ice caps could be the excess water. antarctica was proven to have melted before, and then refrozen many times. umm. global warming now has caused elevated water levels. well thats my take on the flood.
noah's ark did happen... how do you explain all the animals that are here today? they would have gone extinct because of the flood.. god didnt place the animals after the flood because then it would have been way to crowded. evolution did not happen. things dont magically become something else. prove me wrong? show me a crockaduck..
@Miller15161 do you even think about this critically? how did the penguins get there? kangaroos, etc. how did the people keep the canivores fed? where did they put the dung, or urine?how did they store water, food, or plants? How could 8 or so people clean the stalls? there are so many holes in this fantasy, I cant believe any adult believes this nonsense. Not to mention they never found the Ark. Its not on Ararat,wake up, this is no different than believing God anger is thunder, and lightning.
uh...duh! The flood water ran off the edge of the Earth...honestly...
hangman994Videos 3 days ago
This video reminds me I need to pick up some Trilobite spray, Raptor feed, and a Mammoth brush from the store.
xdassinx 5 days ago
It's hopeless to argue with christians who are born with this CEMENTED in their minds, what their gonna do is get pissed, look for information (in their favor) to come back with an argument. But they for get that they can NEVER answer the 1 question. CAN YOU PROVE THAT A GOD EXISTS?!
HxCDeathMetalHead 1 week ago
Did you hear the troll laugh at the beginning? "HEHEHE."
And then the fail commences.
dinoxmel 1 week ago
Why doesn't some ambitious person figure out the square footage necessary for a pair of all animals plus the space they would need to store the food necessary for however long they were supposed to have stayed afloat? Without doing the math I would assume that the arc must have been waaaay too big to be structurally feasible to build in wood, would have taken centuries to build, and of course impossible for one man to build. Put this mythology to rest. How can even morons believe this crap?
55chh 1 week ago 2
xdassinx 5 days ago
@xdassinx WOW...Thanx!!!!
55chh 4 days ago
I don't think this guy knows how fossils work.
Daugueffxi 1 week ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Great page for atheists... go here and see all the contradictions in the Bible and how many times it is wrong. Dare to read. Amazingbibledotorg
spiegeltn 2 weeks ago
Those ichthyosaurs couldn't swim for toffee.
revjimbob 2 weeks ago
There are no fossil rabbits in the Precambrian.
'Splain that.
SeedsOfHatred 3 weeks ago
Where did the water from the flood go? The Neptune Men stole it. Just like they tried to steal our remaining water and menace japanese children in 1961.
mrdarkevilme 3 weeks ago
no there were no dinosaurs on the Ark because they died out long before humans came to be. Science has proved that a number of times.
bobcatallstar7 3 weeks ago
@bobcatallstar7 Yes, but science has proven the flood never happened at all.
InternetDarkLord 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
"..and where did the water go? I mean, where did it go?" - <3
TheGinetik 3 weeks ago
When making this argument, people often forget to mention human artifacts, which would sink to the bottom with the trilobite fossils. And what of pterosaurs, which could fly and escape the flood waters?
Staunts 3 weeks ago
That was embarrassing to watch...pathetic
jfwade13 4 weeks ago
This woman is smart, but god damn it she talks too much.
WakingLife55 4 weeks ago
The rains went on for 40 days and 40 nights. The flood itself lasted much longer. I re-read the whole story yesterday arguing the absurdity of every other word in it to a theist.
TonyEvans96 1 month ago
LOL this is so stupid. why even bring up the Noah flood.
jondeare 1 month ago
Gotta love how morons call up using Kent Hovind's old, washed up ideas like people have never heard them before.
JonO387 1 month ago
I think athiests forget,no matter what kind logic,reasoning or evidence you bring to the debate, thiest play to thier trump card" God did it with his holy magic" so you lose lol
mandrillx 1 month ago
There's no argument required to disprove the flood/ ark myth. All that's required is to agree that koalas, kangaroos, and emus exist. How did these species make their way across a HUGE amount of ocean to the middle east where the ark was built - in breeding pairs no less? And most importantly: why, after the ark ran aground, would they ever bother with that long, IMPOSSIBLE swim back to Australia? They'd have stayed somewhere else.
It's a myth, you creatard nitwits!
ChipArgyle 1 month ago
@ChipArgyle they had private jets you dummy or god teleported em to the ark, see it's very simple if you are a creationist trololol xD
linkuei83 1 month ago
@linkuei83 Actually, Conservapedia suggests that God may have used volcanoes to literally launch the little critters back to their respective continents. Of course, none of 'em were outfitted with fireproof clothing or parachutes for a soft landing though. That's good creation science!
ChipArgyle 1 month ago
@ChipArgyle holy tittyfucking shit! i forgot about that, but thanks for reminding me, what a great piece on creationist thinking, fuck airplanes, just mount a volcano! This kinda reminds me two more looney stories, the flat earthers that even deny gravity and that the light coming from distant stars doesn't count against 6000yr old earth cause god created it midflight. Should be a site for that kinda things.
linkuei83 1 month ago
@linkuei83 I've never heard of a gravity denier. They just think the Earth sucks or something? Why would God create starlight mid-flight? That would be a deception. It means their God's lying to us. If there's a God that lies to us to make us believe in Him, everyone should be turning their back on Him. It's pretty funny how deep into insanity believers will go to maintain their delusion.
ChipArgyle 1 month ago
@ChipArgyle think we do need a stronger word than insanity, from few of the videos i wathced -get this and sit while you read- the earth doesn't actually suck BUT the earth is moving upwards -YES LADIES AND GENTS- that's why we all stay pinned down... You should really check some of the videos, it's freaking awesome when they try to defend this. As for mid-flight light, well it's because they can't account how we see objects million of L-yrs away and still earth is 6000 old.
linkuei83 1 month ago
@linkuei83 That's funny. In order to be pinned down, we can't just be moving upwards, we have to be ACCELERATING upwards at a constant 9.8 m/s/s. Infinite acceleration requires infinite energy. Yeah, that makes perfect sense.
I know why the mid-flight starlight would be required to see it 6,000 years ago, I was just positing why a God would go to such great lengths to lie to us. Why would that God go to such lengths to pretend He doesn't exist?
ChipArgyle 1 month ago
@ChipArgyle I know, i got the same questions but you can't argue with a theist. They got the easy way out, god did it and what frustrates me more is that they wouldn't defend this if it didn't relate with the existence of god in any way as it's the case for other areas in science.
linkuei83 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ChipArgyle I know, i got the same questions but you can't argue with a theist. They got the easy way out, god did it and what frustrates me more is that they wouldn't defend this if it didn't relate with the existence of god in any way as it's the case for other areas in science.
linkuei83 1 month ago
@ChipArgyle So what those nutjobs do in essence is that they start from a conclusion and everything else is then distorted or even conjured up from thin air to fit their conclusion, and the fucking irony, they use the word, SCIENCE to gain a bit of traction, to piggyback into science's legacy, which of course it does in the minds of the sheep.
linkuei83 1 month ago
It completely BAFFLES me that there are people who actually believe in the flood story. It's such obvious bullshit that even a decently critical not to stupid child could poke holes in it.
And someone who knows anything about science utterly destroys such a nonsensical story.
If in the US many people believe in Noah's flood then that's all the more reason for them to start taxing the rich again and to spend that money on education.
TheSkunkCat 1 month ago
Rich, creamy nougat filling .... hahaha.
rossmetacraft 1 month ago
Why didn't the caller just give up the ghost and concede the point half-way through?
It would of made him look so much less silly.
LeoRikimaru 1 month ago
Then there is the fact that dead bodies float for a while, then sink, then float again as decomposition causes gasses to form in the body, then finally sink after enough decomp has occurred.
MrFungus420 1 month ago
If I believed in God I would be praying frantically right now that this guy never gets to breed.
Jaramide 1 month ago
@Jaramide agreed
thesparitan 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TheAtheistExperience
@Gaybykersonacid Which boat? There are so many arks to choose from.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago
1 male and 1 female of a species is a breeding pair, true, but it's not enough to repopulate because there is so little genetic variation that the offspring will become all fucked up. and then the species would cease to exsist.
snipesnrifles 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The typical creationist argument for why all the animals are not on one buried layer together is because of "hydrologic sorting"....
GotZest 1 month ago
Comment removed
GotZest 1 month ago
5:41 "And where did the water go?". Tracie, I've always wondered the same thing.
Shiesha32941000 1 month ago
@Shiesha32941000 god got thristy? my best guess, that or it didn't happen....hmm i think the latter.
snipesnrifles 1 month ago
@snipesnrifles Lol... I'll go with that it never happened
Shiesha32941000 1 month ago
for the record the bible says "two of every kind", not species. and im pretty sure that you actually do find fossils of all different kinds of organisms throughout the layers
JoshDec7 1 month ago
@JoshDec7 - "for the record the bible says 'two of every kind', not species"
For the record: those biblical 'kinds' don't exist in the real world.
TheAtheistExperience 1 month ago 24
@TheAtheistExperience Im pretty sure it doesn't say what it means exactly when it uses the word "kinds", but i would imagine that it probably would refer to all dogs being one "kind", for example. Anyways, to say that those biblical "kinds" don't exist in the real world without first knowing exactly what it means by "kinds" isn't really fair.
JoshDec7 1 month ago
@TheAtheistExperience
@JoshDec7
the actual word used in the Hebrew text is מין (min) not kind סוג (sug).
modern Hebrew uses the the word מין (min) for both 'sex' and 'species', while סוג (sug) is used for 'genus'.
and whatever some bronze age story teller said according to his limited understanding of the world means nothing.
JaJDoo 2 weeks ago
@JoshDec7 There are 8 million species on the planet. Species meaning cannot breed with each other. How is it that creationists who always say "I believe in micro evolution but one species turning in to another has never been observed" (which is wrong, but anyway..) account for that? You think Noah kept and fed 8 million species on his boat?
66tomm99 1 month ago
@66tomm99 I dont think that any organisms that swim would have gone on the ark, or even been killed by the flood. Also, it says "kind" not species. I don't know for sure but I think a dog, wolf, and coyote are different species but they can still breed with each other. So it would not have been necessary to bring a pair of each species on the ark, but a pair of each kind, which is probably why there are so many species that have gone extinct but are in the fossil record.
JoshDec7 1 month ago
@JoshDec7 Dogs are a subspecies of wolf. Distant relatives who are not distant enough (yet) to be called a different species.
Also, rain is fresh water meaning most sea water fish would have died unless they were taken aboard the ark.
66tomm99 1 month ago
@JoshDec7 Not familiar with osmosis are you? Think about that for a little and then you might understand why that falsifies the flood myth. And I think we will need to look at flood basalts too.
NorthForkFisherman 1 month ago
@JoshDec7 And also for the record all "kinds" would be so incredibly inbred today that there would be little to no variation if there had on been a flood 4400 years ago.
TioPhillippe 1 month ago
@JoshDec7 Yes but all with in the time period they have though to adapted through genetic mutations to form knew species called evolution.
You wont find humans in the Jurrasic period. How do you interpret two of every kind if you dont mean species????
LiveFreeOrDie1985 1 month ago
@JoshDec7 what exactly is a kind?
linkuei83 1 month ago
@JoshDec7 So what's the difference between a "kind" and a species?
ehandkz 1 month ago
@JoshDec7
Yeah the whole, "dogs produce dogs, cats produce cats" completely falls apart when you get to the finer points of evolution. Even the creationists have trouble sorting out the 'kinds' when it gets to that point, and get frustrated and say 'they are all animals, god did it!'"
superwowie111 1 month ago
@JoshDec7 You are pretty sure? What do you base that on? Because you certainly don't base it on any actual study of geology or paleontology.
Estragon17 1 month ago
@JoshDec7 Where did all the water go? Can you answer this question with a logical response?
1991stratplus 2 weeks ago
@1991stratplus
According to Nephilim Free it spurted out from the mid-oceanic rifts and hit the moon, causing the craters.
Makes perfect sense.
revjimbob 2 weeks ago
@JoshDec7
Do you find rabbit fossils in the pre-Cambrian?
revjimbob 2 weeks ago
if there was a world wide flood the fossils would all be on the same level and the fossils would be all the creatures that died in the flood. that is not what we see. we see layers with different creatures.
ZLi0n 1 week ago
@JoshDec7
So with regards to these kinds... Noah didn't have to bring apes or monkeys on the ark then? I mean they are obviously the same kind as humans so they obviously evolved from humans via microevolution. Right?
I mean if tigers and housecats are the same kind, then obviously so is humans and apes. Right?
itsjustameme 1 week ago
@JoshDec7 ...so?
ryonafan 22 hours ago
Im fair sure this was Trolling...Cause i saw a joke video with this guys Thesis.
Snagrit 1 month ago
rofl looks like Jacob didn't really think this through. At some point he realized himself that this really doesn't make sense, but why not just give up on these fary tales and go for the truth. Much easier to argue if you don't have to fight against the facts..
Chris197980CH 1 month ago
Noah probably should have put some plants and fungi on the ark too, it would make the story seem a little more plausible
InsideDating 1 month ago
You can hear the guy's brain shorting out several times during this call. It's pretty funny.
I wonder if Noah brought fish, sharks, and whales onto the ark? Two fleas? Two tapeworms? Two cockroaches? Two fruitflies? In no time, that would'been a MAJOR infestation.
5jerry1 1 month ago
One other point, if the water covered Mt Everest then the ark would have been floating around at 29000 feet, there is not a lot of air up there and its a tad cold, even today humans cant survive there for long without oxygen, so the ark must have carried a fair load of oxygen cylinders to keep that lot alive asw well as a heap of fire wood to generate enough heat to warm everyone up.
mk2zakspeed 1 month ago
@mk2zakspeed Sorry to play devils advocate here, but if the water level rose to the top of mount Everest, then the oxygen level would also rise up as well. Mount Everest would become sea level and so the air pressure would be like it is here now.
that's not to say the the flood story isn't still supremely stupid! Even as a child I didn't believe it!
dedokta 1 month ago
@dedokta, But are you sure, couldn't the water absorb the oxygen, and if you are right then the all the earths atmosphere would have been push further out thus effecting the magnetic field as well as effecting the moon, talking of the moon what about the tides on such a large lump of water. Mmmmm I am sure Kent Hovind has a theory on all this...................Ok Ok I concede you are right but you wont change my faith ...LOL ..:-)
mk2zakspeed 1 month ago
@mk2zakspeed Dumping that much water in 40 days would have caused all types of crazy stuff to occur. the air would basically BE WATER from the amount of rain required. The oxygen level would indeed have been pushed outward as well. I'm not sure about the actual limits here, but this could possibly have led to air bleeding out into space, which would mean that air pressure would have dropped after ward.
Nothing about the flood stories make any sort of sense.
dedokta 1 month ago
What I want to know is what happened to all that water, was it piped back up heaven and stored in a whole bunch of barrels in case it was needed again?. Or was the earth put into a spin cycle to dry it out a bit, its always bothered me where a few trillion gallons of water went
mk2zakspeed 1 month ago
I wonder if this guy thought that all the dead and buried people from before the flood got up and ran from the flood. then reburied themselves on the new strata.
anothergazman 1 month ago 7
If this guy had actual evidence for Noah's flood, he'd have a Nobel prize!
Lennon4ever1 1 month ago
What bothers me the most is that the Bible specifically states that God hated the Earth so much he wanted to destroy all the life that he had created on it. So why destroy all life and yet allow one family to re-populate the exact same species that were there before God destroyed them? If we're talking about God here then none of the animals he created should have been allowed to survive so that he could create and completely new set of animals that he would like.
Bromopar 1 month ago
@Bromopar Yeah, one of the most obvious questions about the whole story-- Why a FLOOD? Why not just make all the "wicked" things disappear?
GoblinXXX 1 month ago
Congratulations to the presenters. I would have been less tolerant.
mikelheron20 1 month ago
Is this guy actually trying to make a case for 'hydraulic sorting'?
This would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.
dingodavid 1 month ago
@dingodavid It sounds like he's going more for "the big strong animals stayed afloat longer", ignorant of course of the fact that we also find fossilized snails and mice and little frogs and insects at newer/higher levels along WITH dinosaurs, and megafauna, and protohumans.
GoblinXXX 1 month ago
@GoblinXXX Yes, I see that now.
Of course if his argument carried any weight at all, then we would expect to find ancient aquatic and marine reptiles like mossosaurs, plesiosaurs, ichthiosaurs etc in higher strata all mixed up with fossils of aquatic and marine mammals like dolphins, whales, otters etc.
dingodavid 1 month ago
@dingodavid Exactly. It reminds me a little of people who argue that all fossils come from the flood because they're always in "positions of agony", like they expect animal corpses to being lying on their backs with their paws or wings crossed over their chests, otherwise. I'm not sure if this guy's idea, or hydraulic sorting, is dumber.
GoblinXXX 1 month ago
I can't believe that in the 21st century, people still feel the need to interpret the flood myth literally, and use bad pseudo-science to back it up. I accuse these people of not really believing thse things themselves, but of only pretending to believe it for ideological reasons.
blackmichael75 1 month ago 2
@blackmichael75 Dude, I can't believe the myth survived the Renaissance, never mind into this century!
GoblinXXX 1 month ago
I like traCie!!!
PrinceOfMemphis 2 months ago
FUCK SCIENCE IN DA ASS WITH A PHAT DICK. ALL YOU MOTHERFUCKERS ARE GOING STR8 TO HELL ITS A BIG ASS LAKE OF FIRE UNDERNEATH THIS EARTH AND YOUR SOULS ARE THE MEAT BITCH. ALL YOU FUCKS NEED TO STFU WITH YOU MOCKERY OF JESUS I WANNA SMOKE ANGEL DUST AND GO DAVID KORESH ON YOU MOTHERFUCKERS ON XMAS AND FUCK'N SACRAFICE YOUR MOTHERS TOO THE SUN GOD SMOKE AND BLUNT AND PUT MY ASHES OUT ON YOUR CHILDREN.
commando713 2 months ago
@commando713 Cool story, bro.
66gt40lm 2 months ago
Flood evidence = Major FAIL........SMH
MATZAMAN76 2 months ago
The people that brought you the bible are not the same people who bring you science, medicine etc etc....
MATZAMAN76 2 months ago
This may be the first time I have heard someone who is too stupid to understand how DIRT works.
blackacidlizzard 2 months ago
OWNED!
RyuHadokenMaster 2 months ago
Tell me Christian. What happens to salt water fish when you introduce massive amounts of cold fresh water??? They all die. What happens to fresh water fish when you introduce massive amounts of cold fresh water and salt water? THEY ALL DIE!!
So. The flood kills EVERY fish in the ocean, every mammal on land, and the disease from all the dead would contaminate the oceans, rivers, lakes and kill everything else that “survived”.
1NWOMD 2 months ago 8
Dumb fuck
Casshyr 2 months ago
WHAT A BIG FAIL.... HEHEHEHE
TheOnlymorais 2 months ago
Ha I love this.
MrVillamike 3 months ago 3
Geez, serve it up on a tee for these two.
brmadman4455 3 months ago
God...if you are out there.....please deliver me from idiots!! I cannot stand it! Can someone with half a brain be so stupid?
EddieCurrentFan 3 months ago 3
Another crazy caller that has not done any research. Just like 99% of creationists they don't really care to know the truth and when you hit them with it they refuse to acknowledge it and quickly change the subject. Even if I just arrived on this planet and one group showed me a Bible with claims and the other showed me libraries after libraries filled with research I would have enough common sense to side with the scientific research hello!
baxtar2012 3 months ago
Why don't we find skeletons of, let's say, kangaroos that died while hopping back all the way to Australia from mount Ararat? It must have taken them a very long time and quite a few generations. Any kangaroo' skeletons found in Turkey? :))
....I believe this man has some "magical scientific" answer to this....and I do not want to hear it ))
000dodo000 3 months ago 3
Tracie: "I don't mean to be cruel but this isn't working for me".
THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID!
Kidding aside, that caller was crushed mercilessly. Good!
UseYerEFFINBrain 3 months ago 3
Honestly, I don't how that guy could possibly think that he's argument is so effective that it's worth some consideration by those atheists. C'mon, people can't be this dumb.
WanderingProphet 3 months ago
I feel ashamed to even have the same name as that scientific illiterate...
Blargaha 3 months ago in playlist Fler videoklipp från TheAtheistExperience 2
Apatheist here. A weird hole in the hosts' argument. What if there were extinctions before the flood?
bgiv2010 3 months ago
@bgiv2010 The problem is many creationists insist the earth's sedimentary layers are from Noah's farce. So everything in those layers was alive when the rain started.
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Right but what about things that were no longer alive before the flood? I was just pointing out that both the hosts and the caller seemed to think that there were no extinctions before the flood, such that, assuming Noah did a perfect job of gathering two (sometimes seven) of every species, there were no losses between the beginning of time and the end of the flood. I just think that this is unlikely...or, at least, should be acknowledge.
bgiv2010 3 months ago
@bgiv2010 Well, if the creationist insists that the earth's sedimentary layers were laid down by Noah's Farce, they are still stuck with everything in the geologic column, like all known dinosaur species. They could try to claim some sedimentary rock is not from the flood, by that creates new problems, like "Which layers are flood layers? How do you know which is which? If layers can be formed without floods, why any of them at all?"
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago
I'm an atheist, but I didn't like this exchange. These people obviously know little to nothing about the bible, including the guy who called in.
wasdare32 3 months ago
God said to Noah, "Youre ganna build an Arky, Arky!"
tph2010 3 months ago
Non-Swimming Humans! I love it!
psb1964 3 months ago 3
there are turtles fossilized from the age of the dinosaurs, and below that there are fossilized very agile mammal-like creatures similar to possums and the such, these would have easily outrun the turtles that are found above them. This whole argument is based on an assumption that isn't true.
red666111 3 months ago 3
Best answer I've ever heard from a creationist. and I qoute: "Uhm..."
18booma 3 months ago 3
Only someone who denies real sciences would believe the story of the flood and Noah. Willful ignorance make this person an idiot.
bobster451 3 months ago 30
Ok, once again why is there minimum levels of thought prepossessing here. there are single layers of fossils in one spot! are you ready? its call petroleum! wow ! how hard was that? you guys try disproving the bible while ignoring scientific evidence that proves events in the bible? care to explain why? by the way if your answer takes more then one day, it proves obvious that you are desperately researching a rebuttal . regardless this is very amusing! LOL!!!
1AD76 3 months ago
@1AD76 What are you babbling about? Petroleum forms over millions of years, a young earth has none.
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago 3
Comment removed
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago
Comment removed
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago
@1AD76 Google K-T Boundary, think about how Genesis says that a sky wizard magically created all land animals (including human) on the same day, and you'll stop with the LOL and feel foolish.
Genesis is wrong by well over 65 million years.
Earth created before stars? Hubble telescope proves that to be nonsense too.
Witches should be killed? WITCHES? How delusional do you have to be to buy that bullshit?
Bible = Provably false myth.
Face it. You have no invisible friends with "powers".
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago 16
@1AD76 Won mour victorie four homeskuling.
acr08807 3 months ago 3
@1AD76 My goodness what nonsense you speak hahah laughable.
itchygonads 3 months ago
Do people enjoy calling in and having their beliefs destroyed?
fdasherv 4 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAtheistExperience
...soooooo, every single human outlasted every single dinosaur. Even the crippled one, the old ones, the ones who were sleeping in caves when the water came up, and the 2-year-old children. They all still stayed alive until the very last brachiosaurus breathed its last breath.
And FUCK YOU, Firefox spell-check, I do NOT mean "brontosaurus". Add to dictionary.
GuacamoleKun 4 months ago
Jacob needs to stop talking forever and get a job as a mime.
metalsusa1 4 months ago
there is a video i forgot what it is was named but Christians claim God shrunk all the animals on the planet so they would fit lol
philosophicalreason 4 months ago
What excatly did the flood accomplish to get rid of the sinners? Only to repopulate the world with more sinners...to eventually destroy the world again ...excellent plan.How about after flood flood turn the earth back into the garden of eden and either completely remove the evil nature from them?
MrEmeraldfusion 4 months ago 5
@MrEmeraldfusion If there is one thing god is good at it's fucking up at every possible chance.
brongarago 4 months ago 5
@MrEmeraldfusion Oh, and mass genocide.
brongarago 4 months ago
Love this!! Fucking epic! LOL!
TravelingChic84 4 months ago
gerbiles ftw!!
conman2317 4 months ago
For a change, the caller was well thought out and presented.
Wrong as can be, but wonrg in a well presented way.
whiteowl1415 4 months ago
@whiteowl1415 Apart from saying "Um" and "Ermm" every time they called him out.
lewisner 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lewisner
True, I was merely refering to him actualy having a coherent argument, his public speaking skills (does phone count as public speaking?) need work, but he wasn't just pulling the Old "Its in the Bible so its true" or "I beleive it so its true" stuff we are used to hearing.
whiteowl1415 4 months ago
One thing that is not often brought up, I guess because the theist has allready been buried by logic like, with all the Animals on an Ark, what of the specialised food required and some animals will only eat freash.
How about the excuse they were babies and eggs. We now know many animals learn to survive, hunt, feed, migrate, nest, mate by learning from thier parents. How would they survive without parents. Also minimum weaning ages means some not so small. Still don't fit by a mile.
VideoAudioDisco09 4 months ago
Oh not fare, using the bible against a creationist. What chance did this idiot have.
The Ark myth is long debunked, one thing alone is missing before anything else need be considered a single world wide layer of silt.
Should have asked him about the Giants they appeared in the bible after the flood. Yes after WTF.
PS: Rain 40 days boat afloat for 300 days. The energy of such a flood would boil the ocean killing all fish.
VideoAudioDisco09 4 months ago
Don't you know? Te weight of the land caused so much pressure that it pushed the water right to the moon!!! LMAO Maybe the fossils went with it!...... ROFL.... The very first monkeys in space.....Bwahahahahaha!!!
skywize 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Atheism is so senseless. When I look at the solar system, I see the earth at the right distance from the sun to receive the proper amounts of heat and light. This did not happen by chance." Sir Isaac Newton
rom116rom 4 months ago
@rom116rom
Newton lived before we knew anything of radiation or how atoms work so why should we accept that statement as any sort of fact? Albert Einstein deneid quantum physics and we know them now to be as valid as regular physics. You fail tremendously.
NUTCASE71733 4 months ago
where did the water go? Is that what she's asking? Ask al gore.
vaskaim 4 months ago
@Blackout3196
- "Hey this is for all the athiest out there!!! I would rather belive in god and be wrong then not belive in him and be wrong! Because if you belived in him and was wrong nothing would happen you'd just rot in the ground! but if you didnt belive in him and you were wrong you're gonna suffer in hell forever!! now you pick what path to take!!!!"
Blocked for using Pascal's Wager.
TheAtheistExperience 4 months ago 2
It is every "kind"... but still dinosaurs would have to go on the ark... even in job there is reference to dinosaurs and the stories according to theologians were timewise around the same time... so the Bible makes claims dinosaurs would have to be on the ark and existed with humans so his claim of fossil record to prove flood doesn't Float (haha a pun)
ashleysloop 4 months ago
@ashleysloop Where in Job is there a reference to Dinosaurs?
ColbyFoote 4 months ago
@ColbyFoote it is mentioned in Job 40:15 as Behemoth, theologians make claims this is a reference to a plant eating dinosaur and also in Job 41:1 as leviathan, which they claim as a type of fire breathing dragon. Not all claim this exact interpretation/translation but many who claim young earth especially those who agree that dinosaurs and humans lived together do.
ashleysloop 3 months ago
@ashleysloop A Behemoth is defined as a large animal or entity. It's a serious stretch to call that a dinosaur. The bible was written before people knew anything about dinosaurs. Hard to believe that humans and dinosaurs lived at the same time, especially when fossil evidence tells us humans have only been around for about 70,000 years, while dinosaurs died out around 60 Million years ago. I'll take that over some interpretation of an ancient book any day.
ColbyFoote 2 months ago
This makes me sad to be a Minnesotan.
JohnMcNuggetFingers 4 months ago
Not their best show.
PiskieBenWa 4 months ago
The female host needs to STFU a tad.
PiskieBenWa 4 months ago
For the ist time I see these hosts making a sloppy argument.
Noahs ark is an mpossability for many reasons but as the huge ammount of water needed is the greatest, lets start there before we take it any further.
Let's say god but the water on the world an then took it away after?
With that much water in the atmosphere,we won't live to see the flood, we'd be killed by it
johnsergei 4 months ago
This lady here doesn't realize the falsity of her logic. If noah took only 2 or 7 of every animal on the planet, of course there would be fossil remains of all animals that existed at that time. Of course they would all be jumbled together in a specific layer. But they sure did flabbergast the caller.:D I believe that a bad flood may have happened (historical records, existence in other religions), but not anywhere near the strength of the bible's flood. lol
NaomiSlverflame 4 months ago
@NaomiSlverflame so basically you have made up your own religion, that does not rely on the bible. Congrats! You are now a false prophet according to wichever god you believe in, and according to your religion you will burn in hell.
Or, you are simply wrong and your god dont exist. Wich is more likely?
MagnusNyborg 4 months ago
@MagnusNyborg no, no. I'm an atheist/non-theist. I'm just saying that the lady wasn't thinking when she said there wouldn't be any fossil remains/extinct species if noah took 2or7 of every animal onto his boat. Billions upon billions of animals still would've died if the biblical flood actually occurred.
I'm not sure where you think i've made up my own religion? Believing a flood of some type occured doesn't mean i have my own religion, and the rest of your statement doesn't make any sense..
NaomiSlverflame 4 months ago
@NaomiSlverflame sorry, i misunderstood your words 'This lady here doesn't realize the falsity of her logic' as being Tracy's logic being falsified. againg, my fault, sorry.
MagnusNyborg 4 months ago
@MagnusNyborg nah, it was just that one line. I'd've said, maybe, "why aren't the fossils all jumbled up in one layer, if everything died at the same time? Something about the different types of stone and if so much died at once wouldn't they be in the same kind of earth/dirt/stone." The rest of the video was good.
NaomiSlverflame 4 months ago
@NaomiSlverflame Tracy's argument are perfectly sound, i agree the video is very good.
MagnusNyborg 4 months ago
I can't wait for the atheist experience #666!
KrustynailsVideo 4 months ago 5
@KrustynailsVideo
- "I can't wait for the atheist experience #666!"
Then you'll have to wait until July 2010, because next week they'll first do episode #730.
(Spoiler alert: the best part of episode #666 was the special intro that you can find on this channel.)
TheAtheistExperience 4 months ago 12
@TheAtheistExperience haha how stupid of me, but oh well. thanks!
KrustynailsVideo 4 months ago
@TheAtheistExperience I got here from unfolliwingjesus, pretty funny website
KrustynailsVideo 4 months ago
@KrustynailsVideo it shows up on the list of recommended videos to the right. At least that happened to me.
dragonfan1981 2 months ago
"As you go up and up you find more complex animals"
That's evidence for evolution. Good job retard.
Antamar123 4 months ago
Message to all theists - don't mess with Ripley!
jagara1 4 months ago
well i dont think the flood isnt real because even in my culture there is a story of a great flood. and its not a religous story, its history passed down not that this has anything to do with Noah. ice caps could be the excess water. antarctica was proven to have melted before, and then refrozen many times. umm. global warming now has caused elevated water levels. well thats my take on the flood.
otherdude15 4 months ago
I thought I heard a tweety bird flying around his head....
ab330 4 months ago
I love this show. so so fucking much.
ricochet188 4 months ago
noah's ark did happen... how do you explain all the animals that are here today? they would have gone extinct because of the flood.. god didnt place the animals after the flood because then it would have been way to crowded. evolution did not happen. things dont magically become something else. prove me wrong? show me a crockaduck..
Miller15161 4 months ago
@Miller15161 You need to do a little more research into this subject before you spout your arrogant comments about it.
JonMcGrawMusic 4 months ago
@Miller15161 do you even think about this critically? how did the penguins get there? kangaroos, etc. how did the people keep the canivores fed? where did they put the dung, or urine?how did they store water, food, or plants? How could 8 or so people clean the stalls? there are so many holes in this fantasy, I cant believe any adult believes this nonsense. Not to mention they never found the Ark. Its not on Ararat,wake up, this is no different than believing God anger is thunder, and lightning.
OLDSKOOLNYC1 4 months ago
@OLDSKOOLNYC1 agreed. but the dung and urine could be simply washed or tossed into the ocean right?
otherdude15 4 months ago