No need to implant in the sulcus, on the contrary, in this case it is better in the bag. About the CTR, I thought about that, but the dialysis was too small, the haptic of the IOL was enough to compress this area. If it was bigger than that, I won't hesitate to implant a CTR.
in my opinion CAPSULAR RING is the best chois in such cases; you can reduce asp ratio and bootle hight than bimanualy aspirate the remaining cortical material
I thought about that, but the dialysis was too small, the haptic of the IOL was enough to compress this area. If it was bigger than that, I won't hesitate to implant a CTR.
Interesting video ya tarek, I think you might had put the IOL in the sulcus, or capture the optic in rhexis, what do you think!!...
but i loved how you managed it, also would you consider CTR in such cases! keep up the excellent work we are following you man :)
elmotasem 3 years ago
No need to implant in the sulcus, on the contrary, in this case it is better in the bag. About the CTR, I thought about that, but the dialysis was too small, the haptic of the IOL was enough to compress this area. If it was bigger than that, I won't hesitate to implant a CTR.
taay007 3 years ago
in my opinion CAPSULAR RING is the best chois in such cases; you can reduce asp ratio and bootle hight than bimanualy aspirate the remaining cortical material
anka33tr 3 years ago
I thought about that, but the dialysis was too small, the haptic of the IOL was enough to compress this area. If it was bigger than that, I won't hesitate to implant a CTR.
taay007 3 years ago