Added: 2 years ago
From: PoliticsNewsPolitics
Views: 649
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Is Dean TRYING to look dumber than obama?

    Or is it that he really IS a idiot???

  • LMAO!! Dean gets PWND on FOX again!!

    I love how they all act like victims who were "brought down" when they get fired for being idiots! Hey Howard, Van Jones was an anti-American COMMUNIST you jackass!!

    Poor poor little Democrats. Always wittle victims! LOL! They've tried to get Rush, Hannity, Savage, Beck, Dr Laura, Dwayne Chapman, Ann Coulter, Imus & tons of politicians fired from thier jobs haven't they?

    Hypocrites!

  • Mr Dean if you really believe this than go tell the people of america your views...go to iowa!...and colorado.!..and ohio!..and michigan!...and kentucky.!...wheeeeee haaa weee!!!!!

  • One Czar down. 56 more to go. Don't let up America. Obama is out of control. All the Czars are dangerous.

  • And who brought you down DEAN ?! YOU RETARDED CLOWN..YEAAAHHAAAHHHH.. LMAO@ THIS IDIOT !

  • Howard Dean starts off by saying that Van Jones is a Yale educated Lawyer and then says he was signing petitions whose content he was unaware of. (?) What did they teach him at Yale? Make up your mind Howard, is this guy a brilliant Yale lawyer or a dumb bell? Or maybe we think you're just clouding the issue again. Interesting how often these days liberals need to make excuses and rationalize things we all can otherwise easily see.

  • Bay Area Marxist/Truther/ race hustler- X -environmental justice czar Van "under the bus"Jones is the first recipient of the new medal, Hero of the USSA.

  • No Dean, it takes 2 hands to clap. Your side refused to stand up for their candidate like President Bush did for Gonzales when he was in trouble. Your side lack of spine was also a major factor and too.

    For more info please visit my site.

  • Dont worry your pretty little heads; zerO is sure to find another card carrying Commie POS to replace him with.

  • False again; He is the father of eco-CAPITALISM.

    For more information read article "Vindication of Van Jones" on my site.

  • Therein lies the debate, we've had plenty of exposure to one side of the global temperature change theory launched solely by the U.N. IPCC panel and their recommendations and promoted by Nobel Prize winner Al Gore's media hype. Equal exposure should be given to a major international scientific conference held in Oslo, Norway by The International Geological Congress last year. But alas, instead of affording both sides equal exposure, those who would profit from eco-capitalism silence opposition.

  • Lets go trough the news in the last 30 days, Bangladesh would be losing land mass, Maldives to vanish. Many Pacific Islands are already gone. China and India has temperatures that hit the roof, we had fires when the fire season has not started. Would the dissapearance of the Arctic circle in the summer in 10 - 20 years not satisfy you? Would the Ice mass in Greenland disappearing not be conclusive. Global warming is real. No doubt about that.

  • Undisputable... Analysis shows that Antarctic surface temperatures increased an average of 0.22°F (0.12°C) per decade between 1957 and 2006. That's a rise of more than 1°F (0.5°C) in the last half century. West Antarctica warmed at a higher rate, rising 0.31°F (0.17°C) per decade. How much of that is 'truly' man-manufactured warming is where the debate lies. I am mere stating, that the world has been biased by only being exposed to the U.N. IPCC panel's theory.

  • Van Jones may be the father of eco-Capitalism, but he is to environment capitalism as was what Einstein was to the nuclear bomb. Give me a break! It's all about profit, not the environment.

  • No it is not. Eco-Capitalism is the maneuvering of state to a green energy economy and being profitable at the same time.

  • Semantics... some call it maneuvering; some call it coercion by omission or green manipulation.

  • No it is not. E.g. The US needs manufacturing back is it "coercion by omission" or is it "manipulation" when the government take steps/ maneuver to achieve that?

  • We are in agreement, 'the U.S. needs manufacturing back.' Furthermore, I support the path to alternative energy sources. Restoring a manufacturing base to the U.S. implies a boost and/or a stabilizing factor to our economy. As currently written the 'green-initiatives, or Cap & Trade, would undermine the very boost to our economy you suggest. The aggressive benchmarks will balloon existing energy costs and punish Americans for technology that is still in R&D or has not yet been invented.

  • I am against the cap and trade bill myself as people would find ways to go round it. They should not play the game of a carrot and stick. They should use legislation; That is how UAE is going about doing it, and it is sad that an Arab state funded with our dollars and brains and not us. Why? Because they are running out of oil and need to do something soon; while that urgency is not there for us.

  • Money, money, money... that is the motivating factor for most politicians and elites, that and power. If you follow the money and dig deep enough, you will find what forms their opinions, ideologies and the driving force behind their yea or nay vote. Sadly enough, environmental and almost every issue is skewed with financial persuasion. FYI: Watch for a movement away from purchasing petroleum products from Venezuela and the Mid-East and a shift toward Brazil.

  • That is where Van Jones came in. He made the model for where you can profit from green energy. That is why it is being followed. This guy is to eco-capitalism as what Einstein is to the nuclear bomb.

    Middle East is going down on oil production. Their oil would be out in a century. Brazil which has a huge % energy coming from green sources now has found a goldmine of oil away from their shores.

    Lastly, global warming is real and we need to do something about it. Van Jones showed us how.

  • howie dean looks like a giant THUMB. and he's tryingggg soooo hard to be relevant (by sucking up to obama)

  • Repblicans are FASCISTS

    The right wing brought him down he shouldnt have quit

  • The right are still far from it. See the Taliban and Saddam Hussein, and you can see how much the Republicans are still better than them.

    But that does not mean that I like it though.

  • dude if we allowed the religious right to have there way we'd be worse thanthe taliban.

    These clowns want to close the borders to keep out latinos. I mean seriously how fucking Insane is that.

    And if thats not bad enough they see torture as JUSTIFIED. I mean come on these peopl e are Fascists

  • I think that both borders should have fences, but we should not close it. That would be crazy.

    Dude, I have seen far left and I have seen far right. You think Rush Limbaugh is bad, wait till you hear what Mullahs say openly during Friday prayer. Here they want to ban same sex marriages. There, they are stoned to death.

    Neither are the Dems socialist too. No where close....

  • Dude im telling you if the far right had there way. We'd be burning them at the stake.

    18th century Massachussetts anyone?

  • "VERY INTERESTING?"

  • Fences, we don't need no stinking fences. We need E-Verify to be a national standard business practice.

  • Since you were born the year Regan, a religious right fascist, granted the 1st amnesty maybe you have 'special insight' into how an open-borders scenario works and builds a more economically sound nation. The clowns have nothing against ethnicity or demographic origin, they do however believe in controlled 'legal immigration.' FYI: JFK's political ideology was closer to Regan's than BHO's. I'd suggest a little U.S. history, but thanks to the liberal-left that isn't taught in school any more.

  • Mike Wallace must be SOOO proud of his wholly bought son, Chris. From America's most-respected investigative reporter to top-dollar corporate stooge in one generation... what a proud heritage!!!

  • Hes a Yale Lawyer.

    Well thats the problem Lawyers make laws and defend them.

    So when you send Lawyers to Washington what do you think you'll get?

    MORE LAWS, MORE REGULATION, MORE POWER IN THE HANDS OF ELITISTS.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more