GENEPAX WATER ENERGY SYSTEM

[ted74f]

High school chemistry 101: It takes energy to break bonds.

[cotroneo50]

Ciao vorrei sapere se è possibile contattare il produttore di questa Vettura ....per commercializzarla anche in Italia saluti da ......Mi

[The4LA2Baker0]

Clearly you naysayers haven't done ANY research. I hate to be the one to break this to you troglodytes, but this is a real technology. Take 10 minutes and do the smallest amount of research, but you have to take your head out of your ass first.

[mrduffy1100]

@The4LA2Baker0 This system must use energy to split the water molecule.

[The4LA2Baker0]

@mrduffy1100 Research it. Its a chemical process. The "plates" have to be replaced, but there is no energy input required.

[mrduffy1100]

@The4LA2Baker0 There must be energy involved in making the 'plates'.

Water is a very stable molecule, and it wont split easily, the plates must be very reactive.

[TheMadmanAndre]

@The4LA2Baker0 It takes energy to break bonds, and a lot of energy when you're electrolysing water- oh wait, the last five people said that.

Also, citation needed on your argument.

[BushPilot444]

Only big companies and the govt can afford the platinum so they experiment on and on and make big claims. What is needed is something that will work as a catalyst besides platinum and still be clean and efficient. Filtering the recycling of the water only delays the inevitable.

[BushPilot444]

The reason fuel cells are not affordable and therefore not common place is because a catalyst is needed to convert the water to hydrogen. This is easy enough to do but only platinum is good enough to last very long. I used a special high grade piece of stainless steel and it still dirtied the water too much which is the problem. Then, it stops working and fouls the system since this water has to circulate. It is also more inefficient without platinum....

[erasmusso]

How can the molecule of water just explode like that? What's really happening there?

[frank0067]

Y Our a lair and probably are OIl interested..

free energy is suppressed for years, but now thanks to the great TY and internet..the plans and systems are shown and given freely to us all

[mrduffy1100]

@frank0067 Canada, in 2nd place to the US in stupid Utube comments.

[sanarkhos]

The catalyst is the fuel, not the water. If the catalyst can be made cheaply (it will run out), then this is indeed a breakthrough. If not, well, who the hell cares?

At any rate, it is disingenuous to call their product something that runs on water or is fueled by water.

[shanghaikidx]

It remains a mystery to me, how people can "argue" with their brain being amputated:

- Of course they do not think for one second, otherwise they could find that in history 1000s so called Perpetuum Mobile existed & none of them worked.

- they take a YT video (!!!) as scientific evidence

- they apparently do not like or ignore any scientific methodology, but do not care either if a proof has given empirically and are not interested in why none of the so-called "free energy" "inventions: worked

[ChrisPCrunchy]

This must be true it has been published on pier reviewed You Tube. There can be no doubting this new technology now.

[shanghaikidx]

I reckon you are joking (which is not so quite clear here). Or are you really this dumb?? Hahaha ...

[TheMadmanAndre]

@shanghaikidx I chalk the lack of understanding of even the basics of the scientific method to the downward spiral of education not only in the U.S. but abroad. I keep hearing the phrase Idiocracy" and understanding the context of it, the term hits the nail on the head in a more subtle way.

Genepax closed its doors because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It was obvious they didn't have any, so they went the way of every other crank.

[elcruels]

so.....am i to understand that these really smart sounding responses were written by people that actually dont know that this technology has been around for like...20 years?.....more actually......this is hardly fringe....its just suppressed like everything else good on this earth............even sarcasm......peace..........~e­l cruels

[shanghaijoachim]

This is nothing but a "stupid" electrolysis plus fuel cell (which is just the reverse process). Electrolysis has been already discovered in the 1800s. (Maybe in Gringolandia, it is revolutionarily new, hihi). No need to suppress it. It is rubbish itself already. It does not explain anyhow how the fractioning of the H20 into H2 and O2 happens in the first place. The pictogram says "chemical energy". And where do you think this comes from???

[mrduffy1100]

@elcruels Typical stupid fucking U.S.reply. Go and read a chemistry book.

[ShArpSh0t]

rofl I love how it simply says chemical reaction...

[DeepakMallick]

I'd like to know, in detail, the two catalyst used to break the water and then recombine it.

If these catalysts use less energy than derived from this process, then we have a miracle.

[shanghaijoachim]

We don't have a miracle. They use metal hydrides. These react with water to produce hydrogen, which is then used to power the car. These hydrides will deplete with time and need to be replaced and so they are actually the fuel, not the water. More energy will go into producing them than will be taken out, making them an energy carrier, just like a battery.

But there are enough stupid people who companies like Genepax can make believe anything. Hahahahaha hihihihih ohohoho

[bustermk2]

So what am I looking at?

[retepvosnul]

A water molecule reacting with a catalyst that strips off the oxygen atom ( probably oxidizing the catalyst ) freeing 2 electrons and 2 Hydrogen atoms. The electrons seemingly have some potential and create current and heat and finally the reaction of H2 and 1 *NEW* oxygen atom. is this possible ? yes. Is it efficient ? Not by a long shot, Not if taken into account the cost of making the MEA catalyst (which has to be replaced every so often ).