Hexameron, I really appreciate that you uploaded all this music. I would have not found these wonderful pieces for a long time had I not stumbled upon your videos! :)
A beatiful example of absolutely needless music. Even if this piece was created 200 years ago, it would be sunk into oblivion, just as some other time.
Wow, I'm impressed by these comments. Classical and Romantic music is where you can find probably the most sophisticated trolling on the net. Bravo. ^_^
(kinda blew it with your first comment, JP) T-T-T-TRROLLL in the dungeon!)
@arsviatticae Merely my humble opinion. The piece is flawed on many levels, but I'll just pick the most salient. It represents Alkan's weak misreading (to borrow a phrase from Harold Bloom) of Mozart K.331/i. So listening to it within the context of that agon, it fails to measure up to its predecessor in respect to inner and outer form, structural voice leading, rhythmic organization, and the coherence of structural levels. Again, I'm a huge Alkan fan--just not in this instance.
@JPConnolly2 you know why this is such a good piece? because it sounds good and makes you feel. i feel a ton more from this than that sonata you mentioned... sorry this is such a hard concept for you to conceive
@amxmachine I can assure you that yours is not a hard concept for me to "conceive." We're just talking about two different things. You argue for the piece on purely aesthetic grounds. I, on the other hand, am arguing against the piece both aesthetically and analytically. You retain the right to enjoy this work as I retain the right *not* to. My larger point: there is more to the inherent artistic strength of a work than "it sounds good and makes you feel."
@JPConnolly2 So, would you prefer to see some great homogeneity in music, where everything lives up to your criteria regarding "inner and outer form, structural voice leading, rhythmic organization, and the coherence of structural levels"? I certainly would not!
I find it amusing that you bring up Mozart, as I find him a grossly overrated composer (not a bad one, just too darned repetitive)! :-)
I'm curious to hear which works of Alkan you like (since he was, imo, incredibly innovative/diverse).
@AdamKuczynski Homogeneity? Absolutely not. I do, however, believe we have heuristics--here,mine are Schenkerian analysis/structural voice leading, rotational form, and anxiety-of-influence considerations-- that allow us to evaluate the relative artistic strength of a given composition.
The Concerto for Solo Piano is a tremendous work. It's exquisitely crafted, and it's a scathing rhetorical critique of the "romantic" piano concerto as genre.
@AdamKuczynski Homogeneity? Absolutely not. I do, however, believe we have heuristics--here,mine are Schenkerian analysis/structural voice leading, rotational form, and anxiety-of-influence considerations-- that allow us to evaluate the relative artistic strength of a given composition.
The Concerto for Solo Piano is a tremendous work. It's exquisitely crafted, and it's a scathing rhetorical critique of the "romantic" piano concerto as genre.
@Barbapippo Hello, Barbapippo. I am disturbed not a little by your comment. Please could you provide justification for deeming C-V. Alkan ridiculous? I personally believe that Alkan is a composer of the heights of Liszt or Chopin (who are also not ridiculous). You then continue to dismiss this masterful work as rubbish, without any justification. Such harmonic and melodic prowess in a piece far surpasses much! You then compare it with a song by Mozart, which is in a completely different form...
@VayDooble I dare say that Mozart would agree with you - such incredible feeling and passion in music, not to mention the sheer virtuosity of the pianist cannot, and should not, ever be described as ridiculous. Such an ignorant and ill-informed comment could only be made by someone so insanely jealous of the fact that thwy will never be able to play it; we should marvel in the masters, not dismiss them
@VayDooble by looking at the comments on their channel you begin to see the form of a troll shrouded in a fog of hateful jealousy. there is no convincing someone who is blind in the ears :)
If you think this is amazing check out the first movement of Alkan's Concerto for Colo Piano op. 39. Most people just notice the last movement and overlook the first movement. It's my favorite piece of music.
you think Alkan never sounds naive, cuz I want to underestimate him. See Liszt has naif/little thought parts, and then extraordinary/deep parts in his music, that's his contrast style.
apparently Alkan discriminates people with small hands (or short fingers), lol. You need at least 22cm of handspan to play this (look at the left hand -.-)
@BNM321zxy You can take the F and the G both with your thumb, or with your little finger. But after figuring that out their's still no beginning at this.
6. 02:36 (Adagio) People again, but they are nervous.
7. 02:49 (Allegro moderato) Smoke; the fire revives.
8. 03:04 (L'istesso tempo) The fury of the fire [huge (10 note long) chords in the left hand]. Very powerful part; it describes the fury and the stretch of fire (parts like 03:20-03:43).
9. 04:25 (L'istesso tempo) The fire reach the village; this part sounds like a mix of the "Adagio" and the "L'istesso tempo" parts.
14. 08:10 (Andante) After the fire, the villagers quiet down; they survived it.
15. 10:36 (the written tempo is Andante, but the whole part is mostly in 1 bar) Powerful ending with beautiful arpeggios as the last chords.
This is an amazing story with amazing music. Extremely difficult and beautiful. Alkan use very good extensions between the "movements" (like at 04:14-04:25, the 2nd and the 4th "movement" or the part before the ending).
I don't understand "but he was Jewish". What does that have to do with the question? Plus, there is evidence that he was also Christian. He translated the entire bible from Greek and Hebrew into French, you know.
There's a big difference between artistic representation and translating the entire Bible. If you knew a thing or two about it, you'd know that translating Greek and Hebrew is some of the most difficult work a human being could possibly do. I'm sure he had quite a bit of emotions invested into it. And he even said if he could start everything over, he would paraphrase every single verse into music.
That seems like some strong evidence that he had faith in Jesus.
The Tora and Old Testament are identical, yes. But the Hebrews don't follow the gospel, revelations, acts, and Paul's teachings. This is common place knowledge.
Inexplicable genius. Could any composer be more original, and so remarkably poignant in every piece he/she writes? This seems in the realm of those who really interpret Beethoven well.
@Lukecash12 not really "inexplicable" when chopin and Liszt where commending (and Liszt said he was envious) of Alkan's technique! he could play anything and he was also awesome writting :)
@brandonok14 I don't appreciate the language or the berating sentiments towards Alkan. We realize that some of you just don't really think Alkan was very significant, but we've done our fair share of study, and have spent years listening to his works. You can just as well withhold your opinions about Alkan, but if you need to feel intellectually superior, I'd be happy to debate this with you via private messaging.
@brandonok14 Then you're implying that Mendelssohn isn't good? Since, they both lived the same age, you can say that Mendelssohn is Alkan or Alkan is Mendelssohn by your sense, which is a bit overboard and seems a little stupid if you ask me.
@Lukecash12 It's possible, you have to remain committed to understanding every key, as well as know the process of somehow retaining old idea's and recycling from the ones that seemed bad or useless. imo the hardest part is knowing how the intervals are unique for each key, as well as really understanding the phases and cadences. But obtaining a level of this kind of proficiency requires something resembling madness
i listened to this piece before but i didn't understand it, only with smith's description could i really enjoy it. thanks for illuminating this piece for us!
Imagine how demoralised the pianist would have been if they'd hit a wrong key in one of those final two chords :-0
halfabeet 1 week ago
Hexameron, I really appreciate that you uploaded all this music. I would have not found these wonderful pieces for a long time had I not stumbled upon your videos! :)
shortcircuit94 1 month ago
I like it a lot!
ryancalarts 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the sound of the rain, the bright of the fire, the nature that explodes in all its colours. I've never heard anything like this before.
ForsakenRainMan527 2 months ago
Comment removed
ForsakenRainMan527 2 months ago
This etude is a monster. How ugly !
TempodiPiano 3 months ago
awesome., it tells a story, and it does it in wonderfully...
(222 likes 2 dislikes lol :D)
PianoBlond 3 months ago
This piece is brilliant.
Gerjay 3 months ago
A beatiful example of absolutely needless music. Even if this piece was created 200 years ago, it would be sunk into oblivion, just as some other time.
LiSaiFun 4 months ago
Wow, I'm impressed by these comments. Classical and Romantic music is where you can find probably the most sophisticated trolling on the net. Bravo. ^_^
(kinda blew it with your first comment, JP) T-T-T-TRROLLL in the dungeon!)
RSCPT 4 months ago
Rubbish
randymcknob 4 months ago
The big fire in London!
jeyendeoso 5 months ago
Okay, I love Alkan--really--but this particular piece is horrible.
JPConnolly2 6 months ago
@JPConnolly2 Too hard or are you trolling?
arsviatticae 5 months ago
@arsviatticae Merely my humble opinion. The piece is flawed on many levels, but I'll just pick the most salient. It represents Alkan's weak misreading (to borrow a phrase from Harold Bloom) of Mozart K.331/i. So listening to it within the context of that agon, it fails to measure up to its predecessor in respect to inner and outer form, structural voice leading, rhythmic organization, and the coherence of structural levels. Again, I'm a huge Alkan fan--just not in this instance.
JPConnolly2 5 months ago
Comment removed
amxmachine 5 months ago
@JPConnolly2 you know why this is such a good piece? because it sounds good and makes you feel. i feel a ton more from this than that sonata you mentioned... sorry this is such a hard concept for you to conceive
amxmachine 5 months ago
@amxmachine I can assure you that yours is not a hard concept for me to "conceive." We're just talking about two different things. You argue for the piece on purely aesthetic grounds. I, on the other hand, am arguing against the piece both aesthetically and analytically. You retain the right to enjoy this work as I retain the right *not* to. My larger point: there is more to the inherent artistic strength of a work than "it sounds good and makes you feel."
JPConnolly2 5 months ago
@JPConnolly2 So, would you prefer to see some great homogeneity in music, where everything lives up to your criteria regarding "inner and outer form, structural voice leading, rhythmic organization, and the coherence of structural levels"? I certainly would not!
I find it amusing that you bring up Mozart, as I find him a grossly overrated composer (not a bad one, just too darned repetitive)! :-)
I'm curious to hear which works of Alkan you like (since he was, imo, incredibly innovative/diverse).
AdamKuczynski 4 months ago in playlist AdamKuczynski's Favorited Videos
@AdamKuczynski Homogeneity? Absolutely not. I do, however, believe we have heuristics--here,mine are Schenkerian analysis/structural voice leading, rotational form, and anxiety-of-influence considerations-- that allow us to evaluate the relative artistic strength of a given composition.
The Concerto for Solo Piano is a tremendous work. It's exquisitely crafted, and it's a scathing rhetorical critique of the "romantic" piano concerto as genre.
JPConnolly2 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AdamKuczynski Homogeneity? Absolutely not. I do, however, believe we have heuristics--here,mine are Schenkerian analysis/structural voice leading, rotational form, and anxiety-of-influence considerations-- that allow us to evaluate the relative artistic strength of a given composition.
The Concerto for Solo Piano is a tremendous work. It's exquisitely crafted, and it's a scathing rhetorical critique of the "romantic" piano concerto as genre.
JPConnolly2 4 months ago
definately best of op. 35
cancakmur 7 months ago
Dear god.... simply perfect. This is the kind of music that the piano was written for.
MasterAzunai 8 months ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why wasting one's time with such a ridiculous composer, I cannot understand... the best comment to rubbish like this will always be Mozart's K 522
Barbapippo 8 months ago
@Barbapippo Hello, Barbapippo. I am disturbed not a little by your comment. Please could you provide justification for deeming C-V. Alkan ridiculous? I personally believe that Alkan is a composer of the heights of Liszt or Chopin (who are also not ridiculous). You then continue to dismiss this masterful work as rubbish, without any justification. Such harmonic and melodic prowess in a piece far surpasses much! You then compare it with a song by Mozart, which is in a completely different form...
VayDooble 7 months ago
@VayDooble I dare say that Mozart would agree with you - such incredible feeling and passion in music, not to mention the sheer virtuosity of the pianist cannot, and should not, ever be described as ridiculous. Such an ignorant and ill-informed comment could only be made by someone so insanely jealous of the fact that thwy will never be able to play it; we should marvel in the masters, not dismiss them
mtheadedwally 7 months ago
@VayDooble by looking at the comments on their channel you begin to see the form of a troll shrouded in a fog of hateful jealousy. there is no convincing someone who is blind in the ears :)
amxmachine 6 months ago
Comment removed
amxmachine 9 months ago
Hexameron for president!!!
bratzko79 9 months ago in playlist Charles-Valentin Morhange Alkan 26
Epic win.
gordianknot555 9 months ago
It's pieces like this that make me mad that Alkan isn't more popular >:[
AmalgamOfMeat 9 months ago 3
3:04 .... bad ass
chutdigadut 10 months ago
This is a great piece but I was looking forward most to the ever-so-rare plagal cadence at the end. There was none, if I'm not mistaken.
ThaSchwab 10 months ago
How come the notes are broken up like that when they are written in chords?
twilightz0ne1 11 months ago
such virtuosity, excellent tremolo.
rbob200 1 year ago
AHHHHHH SHIT!!! my friend told me this song would make me shit myself....and well im not to argue
should not have had that been n' beef burrito....
seabassthemexican 1 year ago
This looks more like a Ballade rather than an etude...
Anyway, this is just outstanding! Incredible combination of two contrasting sections, leading to a powerful climax in the coda...brilliant!
joao975ca 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you think this is amazing check out the first movement of Alkan's Concerto for Colo Piano op. 39. Most people just notice the last movement and overlook the first movement. It's my favorite piece of music.
youtube.com/watch?v=5hQ1D-6nZ7c
Hamelin is playing. Audio plus music
cedricrlongreen 1 year ago
Comment removed
cedricrlongreen 1 year ago
someone made three accounts just to dislike this
54321thedeathbed 1 year ago
Who is the interpretor in this video? He's magnificent!
fenderbender92 1 year ago
This mey be Alkans best
BenjaminTheHolyDiver 1 year ago
This is fantastic. I can't decide whether to kill myself now (5:12) or wait till the end!
guythenew 1 year ago
wow
cedricrlongreen 1 year ago
Alkan must've wanted to confuse people at 4:25. 12/8 in the right hand and 4/4 in the left
Imowedthecarpetonce 1 year ago
10:20 to the end :) The incredible Alkanian triumphant conclusion.
LongDriveChamp03 1 year ago
its not that HUGE a distance anyway
its a tenth....
PLUS a little more for the black key.
i cant, but i think others probably can
Piggywarz 1 year ago
if your hands are too small for the chord,
just do a gliss on the chord.
Piggywarz 1 year ago
Woe is my small Asian hands.
13loodLust 1 year ago
@13loodLust Owch ><, same here.
How far can you extend?
My absolute maximum fluent playing limit is an octave+2 white notes.
paulturtle92 1 year ago
oops, wrong post earlier.
Those chords, at 1:55 to 2:00.
If my hands aren't big enough, should i play 1 note after another, or simply play them a broken chord of some sort?
paulturtle92 1 year ago
@paulturtle92 i would play them as a spread chord
cammywatt95 1 year ago
Comment removed
paulturtle92 1 year ago
Standing ovation; wild applause!!!!!
ColtonBrook 1 year ago
I'm afraid those 3 who pushed "don't like" are deaf :/
Anyway, just amazing, captivating and stunning music as expected from Alkan! Just unbelievably incredible.
DjSidux 1 year ago
The left hand chords around 6:05 made my hand cramp up and hide.
ChopinBachBrahms 1 year ago
5:19 seemed very out of place lol! Great music though, full of surprises and energy
cammywatt95 1 year ago
this song is impossible
the chords are just too big
Himbotron 1 year ago
That is great, but it is also noise music.
alexanderkrampe 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@alexanderkrampe
you're a fucking douche if you honestly think so
supermanifold 1 year ago
I can't play this my hands are too small
airva21901 1 year ago
It's Beethoven on steroids!
Starbirdy9999 1 year ago 29
@Starbirdy9999 Sorry I can not feel a lot of "Beethoven" from this piece.
pingkai 3 months ago
great melody, great level of difficulty. alkan works only need a piano included.
Laudan08 1 year ago
This stuff really touches my heart. It's amazing he's hardly known.
Jim341046 1 year ago
alkan is not only great in techniques, but also in Musicality! never underrate alkan!
BNM321zxy 1 year ago
@BNM321zxy
you think Alkan never sounds naive, cuz I want to underestimate him. See Liszt has naif/little thought parts, and then extraordinary/deep parts in his music, that's his contrast style.
PrincessDesert 1 year ago
apparently Alkan discriminates people with small hands (or short fingers), lol. You need at least 22cm of handspan to play this (look at the left hand -.-)
BrianHo1337 1 year ago 4
i really like the part 5:19-5:56!
BNM321zxy 1 year ago
06:02-- how could you play those six notes at the left hand?
BNM321zxy 1 year ago
@BNM321zxy You can take the F and the G both with your thumb, or with your little finger. But after figuring that out their's still no beginning at this.
Shadowtel 1 year ago
@BNM321zxy you can hit the top g and f at the same time with your thumb.
cowheadcow 1 year ago
06.02 How I supposed to play the left hand? 6 notes on the left hand?
owlpenguin 1 year ago
I shouldn't listen to this music, otherwise i'll want to learn the piece and it's soo hard :(
Angel94angel94 1 year ago 3
just listening to this again. I never get tired of it!!! Such a different side of Alkan I hear in this piece.
ReturnOfTheStienway 1 year ago 2
i think this is rigenssen i kno i spelled the name wrong, dammit
anonymousQ45 1 year ago
Very programmatic!
FranzLisztian 2 years ago 2
5.19 firefighters are coming...
siebhirn 2 years ago 4
My gosh This makes me picture a village on fire with people fleeing and scrambling everywere! This is awsome! I love it
AmericanCars101 2 years ago 5
very insightful!!!
AlexanderZographos 2 years ago
this a iii - i cadence right?
08L1V10N 2 years ago
This really illustrates the perspective of the common person in this situation. Each piece of Alkan's is a world unto itself.
Lukecash12 2 years ago 2
I was trying to figure out what was so etudish about this piece, but then the rest of the piece came and I saw the light.
Zebeldarebel 2 years ago 7
This piece always leaves me in awe. Music has power of untold amount, and Alkan truly was one to bring it to its most epic potential.
More people should hear this music.
RSCPT 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
pearsewl 2 years ago 2
I always thought so myself.
HandyTheXxxX 2 years ago
I generally don't enjoy Alkan's compositions, but this piece is very much an exception. A rare, unique, and under-appreciated gem.
SlyFox616 2 years ago 5
wow - love alkan
sonicv3 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
madlovba2 2 years ago
INCREDIBLE work! I love Alkan's works, and this etude is one of the most beautiful piece what I've ever heard.
I think this piece tells a story: "Fire in the Neighboring Village". I think these are the "movements" of this story:
1. 00:00 (Adagio) Pastoral life, with peace and romance.
2. 01:47 (Sostenuto) People observe something; "something is going on".
3. 02:13 (Allegro moderato) Dim smoke.
4. 02:20 (Adagio) People again, like in sostenuto part.
5. 02:32 (Allegro moderato) Smoke again.
madlovba2 2 years ago 21
This has been flagged as spam show
6. 02:36 (Adagio) People again, but they are nervous.
7. 02:49 (Allegro moderato) Smoke; the fire revives.
8. 03:04 (L'istesso tempo) The fury of the fire [huge (10 note long) chords in the left hand]. Very powerful part; it describes the fury and the stretch of fire (parts like 03:20-03:43).
9. 04:25 (L'istesso tempo) The fire reach the village; this part sounds like a mix of the "Adagio" and the "L'istesso tempo" parts.
madlovba2 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
madlovba2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
10. 05:19 (L'istesso tempo; staccato) The villagers realized the fire; they "need to do something".
11. 05:56 (L'istesso tempo) The fury of the fire again. The villagers start to put out the fire with water (clamando parts (like 06:22-06:25)).
12. 06:43 (L'istesso tempo; fortissimo) The water puts out the fire. Incredible octaves from both directions describes the "fight" of these elements.
13. 06:52 (L'istesso tempo) The "last breath" of the fire with much smoke.
madlovba2 2 years ago 6
14. 08:10 (Andante) After the fire, the villagers quiet down; they survived it.
15. 10:36 (the written tempo is Andante, but the whole part is mostly in 1 bar) Powerful ending with beautiful arpeggios as the last chords.
This is an amazing story with amazing music. Extremely difficult and beautiful. Alkan use very good extensions between the "movements" (like at 04:14-04:25, the 2nd and the 4th "movement" or the part before the ending).
madlovba2 2 years ago 6
@madlovba2 Except for the smoke part. It is definitely FIRE!!!
StrangelyReal 5 months ago in playlist StrangelyReal's Favorited Videos
10:20 ~ feel like in heaven~
qiqi91 2 years ago 7
The slow sections are of such a gospel-sounding nature, I wonder if he grew up in a religious background.
Izzie40404 2 years ago 6
He did, but he was Jewish.
Ltlevim 2 years ago
I don't understand "but he was Jewish". What does that have to do with the question? Plus, there is evidence that he was also Christian. He translated the entire bible from Greek and Hebrew into French, you know.
No offense intended, you just confused me.
Lukecash12 2 years ago 2
Evidence that he was Christian? Seriously, everyone knows that he was Jewish.
Just because Marc Chagal painted Jesus Christ doens't make him a christian.
Lemonizm 2 years ago
There's a big difference between artistic representation and translating the entire Bible. If you knew a thing or two about it, you'd know that translating Greek and Hebrew is some of the most difficult work a human being could possibly do. I'm sure he had quite a bit of emotions invested into it. And he even said if he could start everything over, he would paraphrase every single verse into music.
That seems like some strong evidence that he had faith in Jesus.
Lukecash12 2 years ago
Sorry, I'm not convinced.
Lemonizm 2 years ago
?????
Lukecash12 2 years ago
jews use the same bible, you know
flamethrowerabc 2 years ago
The Tora and Old Testament are identical, yes. But the Hebrews don't follow the gospel, revelations, acts, and Paul's teachings. This is common place knowledge.
Lukecash12 2 years ago 2
touching
DEEZA95 2 years ago
OH MY GODDESS !!!~
ValkiriouS 2 years ago
I always loved No. 7 from this set as well, thanks for putting it up with the score Hex.
KeithWhalen11 2 years ago 5
Beautiful! Reminds me of a Chopin Ballade in some places.
OrangeSodaKing 2 years ago 8
This piece is incredible...........
Pianista061292 2 years ago 18
For a few moths I have only been playing Alkan's music. lol
justchilln2 2 years ago 11
5:57 and past... amazing
Und1ne 2 years ago 13
i think i need a new pair of pants after listening to that
Politikonboard 2 years ago 70
we all do
Angel94angel94 2 years ago 3
@Politikonboard I think you'd need a new pair of hands after playing it =]
123eldest 1 year ago
Inexplicable genius. Could any composer be more original, and so remarkably poignant in every piece he/she writes? This seems in the realm of those who really interpret Beethoven well.
Lukecash12 2 years ago 57
I also think that Alkan's music is very much in the Beethoven style.
felipesarro 2 years ago 10
@Lukecash12 not really "inexplicable" when chopin and Liszt where commending (and Liszt said he was envious) of Alkan's technique! he could play anything and he was also awesome writting :)
Or3st1s 1 year ago
@Lukecash12 The idea that Alkan is in the pantheon of great composers died long ago. He is Mendelssohn with more octaves. Get a fucking grip.
brandonok14 1 year ago
@brandonok14 I don't appreciate the language or the berating sentiments towards Alkan. We realize that some of you just don't really think Alkan was very significant, but we've done our fair share of study, and have spent years listening to his works. You can just as well withhold your opinions about Alkan, but if you need to feel intellectually superior, I'd be happy to debate this with you via private messaging.
Have a good one.
Lukecash12 1 year ago 2
@Lukecash12 I support your opinion. Congratulations. Alkan is an outstanding composer that rivalizes with Liszt, Chopin, and others.
MrBrailowsky 1 year ago
@MrBrailowsky He far surpasses Liszt... and I love Liszt. I can't really say about Chopin, they're simply too different.
MasterAzunai 8 months ago
@brandonok14 Then you're implying that Mendelssohn isn't good? Since, they both lived the same age, you can say that Mendelssohn is Alkan or Alkan is Mendelssohn by your sense, which is a bit overboard and seems a little stupid if you ask me.
CSPlayerDamon 1 year ago
@Lukecash12 It's possible, you have to remain committed to understanding every key, as well as know the process of somehow retaining old idea's and recycling from the ones that seemed bad or useless. imo the hardest part is knowing how the intervals are unique for each key, as well as really understanding the phases and cadences. But obtaining a level of this kind of proficiency requires something resembling madness
TheSingingCello 1 year ago
talk about uncommon notation starting at the Cantica segment in Andante...
Lukecash12 2 years ago 16
I think this piece is very Alkan, in a sense predictably Alkan, and undeniably his idiom of writing in certain parts.
ReturnOfTheStienway 2 years ago 18
This etude is my favorite out of all the major etudes. The form is incredible.
ReturnOfTheStienway 2 years ago 20
i listened to this piece before but i didn't understand it, only with smith's description could i really enjoy it. thanks for illuminating this piece for us!
Sorcerer88 2 years ago 12
This is one of Alkan's best pieces IMO.
4candles 2 years ago 10
Me too!
ReturnOfTheStienway 2 years ago 14
I like alot of alkan etudes...no.9 in the major keys is also a very fun piece to listen to.
Jman0101 2 years ago 7
weirdly enough i was listening to Bernard Ringeissen's recording of this before i came on to youtube and saw it in my subscriptions new posts :D
thanks for another great post
Ho0chie 2 years ago 8
sehr süß!
yuehchopin 2 years ago 8