Could it be that jesus did talk about slavery but it was distroyed or deleted from text? Curruption goes deep. What the people don't know won't hurt them
I've heard of a few that refused to get drivers licenses and register their vehicle and they were constantly having to appear in court and fight to get their vehicle out of impound from where they went through a license check or got pulled over by a cop for not having a license plate, I agree with Quade on his stance , but I don't have the money to constantly get out of jail or get my vehicle out of impound, I'd like to know how he dealt with cops and keeping his vehicle from being impounded
interesting how hollyweird continued to give this man employment considering that most of hollyweird is "liberal". i gathered that anyone outside their view is marginalized or outright shunned.
This really caused me to think. My conclusion is that there really are no such things as innate, inalienable rights. There are only privileges. These are given to you or earned. Just being born doesn't give you the right to anything, not even to continue living, and certainly not to "own" the land on which you were born - land that was there for eons before you and will be for eon afterwards.
He mentions the bible, which doesn't guarantee any rights; it only describes privileges you can earn.
That's a good little slave. Have some more fluorinated tap water, my precious serf. The government is going to take real good care of you. Make sure and be one of the first to get your vaccination this fall. The elite love you.
@gubment0cheese If you born a slave be a good one, but if you can win your freedom do so, then DO NOT seek to be slave again...
Altratronic is right there isn't a single right that you can't give away freely. Being born is not an accomplishment, if you want rights you have to do what the EL-ite do and build a society. One where you are party to, and signatory thereof, of the compacts and treaties which establish the nation-state.
I think I do get it. The premise of Quade's speech is that man-made privileges, which can be given or taken away, are never an acceptable replacement for god-given rights.
However, there is one big problem: There is no such thing as god-given rights. Look in the bible. That book does not specify any innate, inalienable rights for all people. In fact the bible implies the opposite.
I wish more than anything that this wasn't the case - but wishing never made anything come true.
Well argued, but this seems REALLY complex. Maybe you should watch the "strawman illusion" series. It seems even the seemingly all-encompassing sphere within which collectivism dominates social affairs there are limits to their jurisdiction over the flesh-and-blood person, and that most of what seems to you and I examples of the state's seemingly egregious violations against the person are as a result of tacit acceptance of such laws at some stage. I'd be interested to learn what you find out.
Meanwhile, I found this: "Rights can't be natural, like laws of nature, because nature enforces its laws absolutely, whereas rights are frequently broken. Rights can't be inalienable, because governments frequently revoke rights. They cannot be God-given, because God originally blessed the rights of monarchy, genocide, polygamy, parental killing of disrespectful children, and other rights no one seriously defends today. Rights cannot be self-evident, because philosophers (do not agree on them)."
Hi altra. I do not think Mr Quade aserts the inalienable right could not be taken away. Indeed, his central thesis is that they have, and wantonly. To do so would be to deny material reality. Rather, they could not be removed so long as the lawful authority remains; neither could they be surrendered to an outside authority save through anything but an act of aggression and usurption by an outside agency acting under different law without inalienable rights, which would prohibit such action.
I agree that rights are not assumed natural in the sense they are of nature. Rather they are assumed natural further to the individualist creed of Jesus Christ, upon which inalienable rights are based, who said all were equal before God - a "natural" conclusion. They're assumed God-given in the sense that Jesus' creed came through God, a value judgement. If you don't agree that equality for human beings before the law is natural (perhaps desirable but not natural), then natural they are not.
I wonder why Jesus never spoke out against slavery. It is a fact that the bible was used by slave-owners for hundreds of years as a justification for owning slaves - because of passages like Leviticus 25.44, which gives instructions for buying and selling slaves. This all but puts god's stamp of approval on slavery - which of course belies the notion that all are equal in the eyes of god. I think it's fascinating that the same book is used by people to justify two diametrically opposing views.
I'm no bible expert, but Jesus did seem to rely on scripture. In saying, 'it was written' he referred to the truth of the Word of God revealed therein, but it was more that 'the Word' was God - eternal, unchanging. I think he was talking allegoricaly rather than referring to any biblical specifics that did not support his assertion. I agree he represented such a distinct departure from much of the Abrahamic doctrine that he indeed did often seem diametrically opposed to many old testament views.
I think it's a little fair to ask why Jesus never spoke out specificaly against slavery - if indeed that is the case. It is the same as asking whether central bankers think it's okay to bankrupt an economy, or if the glutton thinks it's wise to devour another double cheeseburger. It is entirely evident from their general actions how they feel.
All rights are natural / inalienable the right to walk and breath are not given by Government or Man
To know what is right and wrong and be responsable ..That is why certain Rights had to be established because we can't have a bunch of dumb ass going around thinking their better than someone else just because they want to drive a car and smoke pot and run someone over.
Life is energy and that's why a tree falls on your house because you deserve it
@MihiLibertas Read Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars. The last line reads, Factor VI - Cattle Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.
So if you don't think, and you give away all your rights freely, well that right there shows all right are lien-able.
It *is* the guy from those movies. The leader of The Black Widows in Every Which Way But 'Loose' (not 'Lose'). I'm sure I've seen him as bad-guy in The A-Team and Knightrider.
You are a native of what land you were born on, end of discussion, just cause the gov't tricked your parents into registering you via registration of live birth, that only applies to the legal fiction called a person, not the lawful man. You have equal right to the land you were born on, not just the indians.
the egyptians migrated to the land that is now the us long before the choctawu and other tribes. you had no country . i `ll eccept the thanks . without the white man all peoples would still be eating fleas off there mates and eating grubes from under rocks. this land is the white mans the indian is from mongolia. white pride not white guilt.
Get a million man march and throw all of crooks out in the street, I guess the rioting helps, like the one in Settle, Wa. during the clinton Administration that scares the hell out of congress.
Wow,I'm impressed.I never realized how BRILLIANT this guy is.Pretty good for the leader of the "Black Widows".....lol
Foolishpleazure 9 months ago
How Do You Get a Quit Title, Or Become A Citizen Of/At Law
willdoseago 1 year ago
The conspirators call us stupid and it is well deserved.
eqwel 1 year ago 2
Could it be that jesus did talk about slavery but it was distroyed or deleted from text? Curruption goes deep. What the people don't know won't hurt them
chrishufstetler 1 year ago
I've heard of a few that refused to get drivers licenses and register their vehicle and they were constantly having to appear in court and fight to get their vehicle out of impound from where they went through a license check or got pulled over by a cop for not having a license plate, I agree with Quade on his stance , but I don't have the money to constantly get out of jail or get my vehicle out of impound, I'd like to know how he dealt with cops and keeping his vehicle from being impounded
undergroundbasement 1 year ago 3
This guy is awesome!Gregarious yet very intelligent!
atrickpay11 2 years ago
Haha, yup brawn and brains. Beefcake genius!
thespacialone 2 years ago
he has to be a little confused now...
danztor 2 years ago
interesting how hollyweird continued to give this man employment considering that most of hollyweird is "liberal". i gathered that anyone outside their view is marginalized or outright shunned.
gjelpd001 2 years ago
This really caused me to think. My conclusion is that there really are no such things as innate, inalienable rights. There are only privileges. These are given to you or earned. Just being born doesn't give you the right to anything, not even to continue living, and certainly not to "own" the land on which you were born - land that was there for eons before you and will be for eon afterwards.
He mentions the bible, which doesn't guarantee any rights; it only describes privileges you can earn.
altratronic 2 years ago
That's a good little slave. Have some more fluorinated tap water, my precious serf. The government is going to take real good care of you. Make sure and be one of the first to get your vaccination this fall. The elite love you.
gubment0cheese 2 years ago 13
Actually, I am one of the elite, so I have unique perspective on this. Your idea of inalienable rights is an illusion.
altratronic 2 years ago
@gubment0cheese If you born a slave be a good one, but if you can win your freedom do so, then DO NOT seek to be slave again...
Altratronic is right there isn't a single right that you can't give away freely. Being born is not an accomplishment, if you want rights you have to do what the EL-ite do and build a society. One where you are party to, and signatory thereof, of the compacts and treaties which establish the nation-state.
wind0wninja 7 months ago
you don't get it.
fumanshu888 2 years ago
I think I do get it. The premise of Quade's speech is that man-made privileges, which can be given or taken away, are never an acceptable replacement for god-given rights.
However, there is one big problem: There is no such thing as god-given rights. Look in the bible. That book does not specify any innate, inalienable rights for all people. In fact the bible implies the opposite.
I wish more than anything that this wasn't the case - but wishing never made anything come true.
altratronic 2 years ago
Well argued, but this seems REALLY complex. Maybe you should watch the "strawman illusion" series. It seems even the seemingly all-encompassing sphere within which collectivism dominates social affairs there are limits to their jurisdiction over the flesh-and-blood person, and that most of what seems to you and I examples of the state's seemingly egregious violations against the person are as a result of tacit acceptance of such laws at some stage. I'd be interested to learn what you find out.
thespacialone 2 years ago 3
I'll watch that. The "you have no rights" bit of George Carlin's is interesting also.
Tacit acceptance of laws? Absolutely. It's the best friend of any ruling body.
altratronic 2 years ago
Meanwhile, I found this: "Rights can't be natural, like laws of nature, because nature enforces its laws absolutely, whereas rights are frequently broken. Rights can't be inalienable, because governments frequently revoke rights. They cannot be God-given, because God originally blessed the rights of monarchy, genocide, polygamy, parental killing of disrespectful children, and other rights no one seriously defends today. Rights cannot be self-evident, because philosophers (do not agree on them)."
altratronic 2 years ago
Hi altra. I do not think Mr Quade aserts the inalienable right could not be taken away. Indeed, his central thesis is that they have, and wantonly. To do so would be to deny material reality. Rather, they could not be removed so long as the lawful authority remains; neither could they be surrendered to an outside authority save through anything but an act of aggression and usurption by an outside agency acting under different law without inalienable rights, which would prohibit such action.
thespacialone 2 years ago
I agree that rights are not assumed natural in the sense they are of nature. Rather they are assumed natural further to the individualist creed of Jesus Christ, upon which inalienable rights are based, who said all were equal before God - a "natural" conclusion. They're assumed God-given in the sense that Jesus' creed came through God, a value judgement. If you don't agree that equality for human beings before the law is natural (perhaps desirable but not natural), then natural they are not.
thespacialone 2 years ago
I wonder why Jesus never spoke out against slavery. It is a fact that the bible was used by slave-owners for hundreds of years as a justification for owning slaves - because of passages like Leviticus 25.44, which gives instructions for buying and selling slaves. This all but puts god's stamp of approval on slavery - which of course belies the notion that all are equal in the eyes of god. I think it's fascinating that the same book is used by people to justify two diametrically opposing views.
altratronic 2 years ago
I'm no bible expert, but Jesus did seem to rely on scripture. In saying, 'it was written' he referred to the truth of the Word of God revealed therein, but it was more that 'the Word' was God - eternal, unchanging. I think he was talking allegoricaly rather than referring to any biblical specifics that did not support his assertion. I agree he represented such a distinct departure from much of the Abrahamic doctrine that he indeed did often seem diametrically opposed to many old testament views.
thespacialone 2 years ago
I think it's a little fair to ask why Jesus never spoke out specificaly against slavery - if indeed that is the case. It is the same as asking whether central bankers think it's okay to bankrupt an economy, or if the glutton thinks it's wise to devour another double cheeseburger. It is entirely evident from their general actions how they feel.
thespacialone 2 years ago
@altratronic
All rights are natural / inalienable the right to walk and breath are not given by Government or Man
To know what is right and wrong and be responsable ..That is why certain Rights had to be established because we can't have a bunch of dumb ass going around thinking their better than someone else just because they want to drive a car and smoke pot and run someone over.
Life is energy and that's why a tree falls on your house because you deserve it
MihiLibertas 2 years ago
@MihiLibertas Read Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars. The last line reads, Factor VI - Cattle Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.
So if you don't think, and you give away all your rights freely, well that right there shows all right are lien-able.
wind0wninja 7 months ago
@wind0wninja nice one ..thanks
reksub10 7 months ago
It *is* the guy from those movies. The leader of The Black Widows in Every Which Way But 'Loose' (not 'Lose'). I'm sure I've seen him as bad-guy in The A-Team and Knightrider.
aiyic 2 years ago
Looks like the bad-guy from Clint Eastwood's, Every Which Way But Lose. You know the one?
aiyic 2 years ago
You are a native of what land you were born on, end of discussion, just cause the gov't tricked your parents into registering you via registration of live birth, that only applies to the legal fiction called a person, not the lawful man. You have equal right to the land you were born on, not just the indians.
kartoonkidd 3 years ago 3
I am sorry there must be some con-fusion.
This land is not yours.
Choctawu 3 years ago
the egyptians migrated to the land that is now the us long before the choctawu and other tribes. you had no country . i `ll eccept the thanks . without the white man all peoples would still be eating fleas off there mates and eating grubes from under rocks. this land is the white mans the indian is from mongolia. white pride not white guilt.
terrycard 3 years ago
Sorry you been smoking too much meth.
Again you got it wrong but you got the indoctrination right.
Choctawu 3 years ago
You must listen to what this man is telling you. It is determent to your survival.
The evil you done in this country tells you who is and who is not...and it is not you or yours.
Choctawu 3 years ago
WTF?
flanaganja 2 years ago
take the red pill and I will show you how far the rabbit hole goes
eddiedaskull 2 years ago
Here's how to use John Quade's legal arguments to win in traffic court: DealsGapDragon*com/how-to-win-in-dragon-court*html
operationnorthwoodz 3 years ago
Hear, Hear! Start sitting in on juries and Grand juries, lets make the corporations pay!
KamikazeKoscki 3 years ago
how do we get rid of ss# and drivers license and get out from all of it.
starshine49 3 years ago
Get a million man march and throw all of crooks out in the street, I guess the rioting helps, like the one in Settle, Wa. during the clinton Administration that scares the hell out of congress.
KamikazeKoscki 3 years ago
No not a riot! mass non co-operation tha'll hit them harder. We have to beat them with our hearts not our fists!
flanaganja 2 years ago 2
ok so how can i fofit my ss card and drivers licens and all that shit
samking12 4 years ago 2
Brilliant. Looking forward to the rest now.
darrenpollard1st 4 years ago 2
go john! Lou
veralou1 4 years ago