Added: 4 years ago
From: Filodream
Views: 26,754
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (99)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This fanboyism is stupid...

    I'm a CnC player (and always will be) and I'm sure SupCom is a great game. Neither one sucks. There's a reason both CnC3 and SupCom got high ratings.

  • who needs a Nuke when you got a rift generater, Scrin FTW!!!!!!

  • Supreme Commander is much more strategic than C&C. SupCom's lack of hard counters helps make it so that picking air, navy or land to specialize in is not a suicidal move. Plus, experimentals. Experimentals are the best super-units ever.

  • now THAT'S a superweapon O_o

  • So one nuclear missile can take out 1000 units, than everyone will get nuke as fast as possible.

  • i cant stand those guys that make a barraks and then make a group of 20 troops and rush to your base i cant fuckin stand it lol

  • tiberium wars 3 si sapeva <.<

  • most realisistic is like this tanks pwn weak vehicles and infantry choppers and planes destroy tanks nukes destroy everything within 25 miles

  • Supreme commander is real strategy game with awesome battles and nukes.. Unlike C&C3 :)

  • have someone a vid then you are playing at onlaine ? i just wonder because i think it would be nice to see how good they are playing online

  • Seraphim super-nuke, ftw.

  • Barely

  • Just played this game and got bored after some hours.

    Skrimish is ok but no way i can play campaign. So boring.

    I think the game is not coded well because it needs to good hardware for this game. C&C 3 KW I can play almost with maxed graphics here must play almost on min graphics. Aldo units dont look so good in Supreme Commander. Most of the time they look boring. Oly big ones look cool.

    Also they move to fast for robod, just looks silly. :D

  • Sorry M8 but C&C 3 is getting so damn old. It's same every game, their only like 1 new unit, nuke is so damn weak for a nuke. Supcom has massive battles and requires REAL STRATERGY it's not as simple as Oh let's build 50 buggys and drive around.

  • Get a fucking better computer then, tightass. And who needs super bright, colourful units for a fun fight?

  • sweet thats one big ass explosion!FUCK YEAH (Supcom part) Ftw

  • ....You suck.......

    Supreme commander's nuke kicks C&C3's nuke anyday.

  • agreed, since some buildings in C&C3's nuke destroys weak buildings and Supcom's nuke is REALISTIC.

  • Fuck you ass muncher...SUPREME COMMANDER IS A REAL RTS game REAL!!!!! CnC 3 is Just crappy as shit EA Ruins Every Game!!! FUCK! YOU!!!!...GET ALIENWARE LAPTOPS FOR BETTER KICKASS GRAPHICS!!!....ass

  • Dude. It's not GPG's fault that your computer sucks balls.

    Oh and the siege bot isn't the only thing. We've got the monkeylord and the colossus which will fuck your apocalpse tanks any day. And unlike your 'epic units', supcom can easily get them out and actually get something good back from it.

  • LOL C&C nuke=shit.

    SupCom is much-much better!!!

  • Supreme commander wins in super weapons and everything else my pc Runs this game great it also runs crysis

  • lol, u fail

  • They should make C&C: Red Alert 3

    And the russian side must have Tsaar Bomba

  • They are making Red Alert 3, genius.

  • Red Alert - Worst of the C&C games. Commie crap garbage.

  • Amazing graphics quality! :) what graphics card do you have? I have never seem a better performance yet :( I'm running C&C3 at a low rate right now because I cannot figure out the problem to the "D3D" or "DirectX" error I have been receiving. I don't understand why am I getting these errors. I tried upgrading my videocard driver which is an "nvidia 7300gs" to the latest version and still no progress the game would just minimize its self and the error window would pop up.Please help me fix this

  • impressive

  • it would be great if the guy would have put the cc3 graphic at another thing that medium quality... theres not even shadows on the ground

  • Are you blind?, there are shadows in the c and c parts.

  • UEF nuke is the best, but the 2nd explosion was the ACU (comamnder)

  • I thought all nukes were created equally.

  • so... anticlimatic

  • GUYS visit my new SUICIDE INSTINCT!!!! ;)

    TNX!!!

  • ??? wat's the game at the end with the epic nuke thing???

    (o btw.. i know a game that pwns c&c3... and..wat ever that other game is... RED ALERT 3.. i just hope ea games make i good.. not bad like cc3's small sw )

  • Its Supreme Commander

  • Ever since EA buyed Westwood they messed up C&c now it's rubish.

  • Wow, the last missile is just epic.

  • How about showing the experimentals instead of 2 of the same weapons of Supreme Commander?

  • Ha!! A NOD nuke just landed across the street from my parking lot. I'll bet my car is covered with dirt. Damn!

  • lol

  • Sorry, when I watched the video seond time I saw, that the Aeon Strategic missile laucher was featured, Filodream forgot to show the Cybran Strategic missile laucher

  • That was awesome! The only problem is that Filodream forgot to show the UEF Strategic Artillery(Mavor) and the Aeon Strategic missile launcher.

  • The nuke looked so small. Like a small modern tactical weapon. Not something from the future.

  • its cz they must of come up with some type of new explosion thing

  • Its called a fuel air bomb. Not a ballistic missile thats housed in a silo. No nuclear weapon would make an explosion that blows up something the size of a small field. The superweapons are crap.

  • Infact, A small fighter plane or artillery piece could make an explosion that big with one bomb. The weapons are pathetic.

  • i thought this was between CnC3 and SupCom not a Nuke on a game and a fighter plane in real life.

  • Yes, a Supreme Commander strategic artillery, Level 3 artillery, or Strategic bomber could make an explosion of that size. Compare it to either one (Sup Com or CNC3) you get the same result.

  • The IonCannon looked so crappy

  • cnc is the daddy of rts, supreme commander is an alternative for all the noobs who just get owned by real rts players

  • CNC is for tank rushers who cant think of anything else to do.

  • Suppose you don't like gettin fucked over by 20 cheap Monkeylords ey?

  • 4:25 now thats a fuckin nuke :D

  • u forgot the mothership that is a superweapon on cnc 3 as well to be honest i think its the strongest

  • Supreme Commander uses real super weapons.

  • i agree

  • Are you mad, You destroy your own soldier!

  • Colossus is a unit in supreme commander, his foot is bigger then a base in C&C 3. and the nuke in C&C 3 looks stupid. EA games never learn. watch supreme commander-nukes and you see real nukes

  • holy fuck im gettin supreme commander

  • this is he truth supreme commander sucks big ones and c&c kick ass!!!!!!!!

  • I have both - SupCom is by far more stratigic and more graphicly amazing, CNC 3 is better pic up and play

  • would you care to offer any evidence or intelligent argument? or are you content spewing out meaningless crap?

  • Hell, yeah!

  • supreme commander rocks and kicks c&c but bigtime

  • Its easier to play C&C 3 that supcom.

  • the GDI ion cannon and the Scrin Rift Generator would kick Supcom's ass!! cybran vs scrin = no more cybrans :) gdi vs uef = no more uef bitch! and nod vs aeon = u guessed it no more aeon!!

  • Oh yeah I can just imagine what the scrin would do if there is one of these big ol' spiders coming towards their base. Or the Nod Avatar vs. the Sacred Assault Bot of the Aeon... pff lol

  • are you insane? if you'd actually check out the scale of the units in SupCom, the smallest units in Supcom are vehicles and mechs, which can be pumped out at the rate of one every few seconds.

  • Scrin: 'Holy shit, how the hell did these 5 super powerful spider tanks get here'

    Cybran: They're cheap and awesome

    GDI: LOL tanks, tanks tanks. Oh shit, half my base got blown up.

    UEF: I <3 mah mavor

    Nod: Moar tanks, moar tanks. We're losing ground

    Aeon: Yawn, 30 tanks and still 200000 hp left on my Colossus. Oh and my paragon's up. Moar Colossus thank you.

  • Ok, from this we have learnt

    That CNC3 super weapons are like a popgun in comparison with the supreme commander super weapons.

    More intensive battle experience my arse!

    SEb

  • C&C3 battles are in smaller scale

  • You just proved what he said. If you agree with him just ignore this statement.

  • Command & Conquer is more user-frendly and rappresent a more intensive battle experience than Supcom (nothing but Total Annihlation 2)....maybe C n' C is still too much rush-based but I think (certainly not the one) that a RTS where Skirmish games may take hours to end it's a mess from the beginning, even without considering other features.

  • Command & Conquer 3 more intensive battle experience than supcom??? LOOOOOL! If you don't know well supcom not comment it, thanks :)

  • ci conosciamo???

  • Supcom spolpa il PD.

  • @Bastylax86 Well, CNC is meant to be fast paced. In 7 minutes you should have full tech and a decently sized army even while fighting against an enemy. Sure, the newer players will get steamrolled by veteran CNC players like myself who use rushes to knock rift-raff out of our way and find good players who, I find, rushes seldom work against. It's more like sizing one another up.

  • @BoydTheMilkmanX

    Depends highly on map size. A game on a 5x5 km map can be over in minutes, and rarely goes past half an hour in normal play. Whilst an 8 player game on an 80x80 km map can go on for hours. Disabling stationary defence or doubling resource rates will also cut game time in half.

    I used to love the old C&C games, Warcraft, Age of Empires etc (well still do...), but since SupCom turned up, every other RTS I see just looks like a game of toy soldiers now. '_'

  • supcom will kick command and conquer 3 i mean you can nuke a cross the map with nukes in supcom

  • L'unica cosa è che le partite di supreme commander sono lunghe e alla lunga portano all'esaurimento nervoso, command è tutto un rush di massimo dieci minuti di tattichine stronze........le due scelte sono agli estremi antipodi.

  • .....what?

    english man, ENGLISH! lol

  • Suck my balls..........supcom sucks!!!!!!!1

  • CNC= tanks, tanks and moar tanks.

    Supcom= Combined arms blitzkreig on ur ass

  • supcom wins like it should

  • GDI's ion cannon rocks!!!!!

  • Sono 2 generi completamente diversi, io preferisco di granlunga SC!!!

  • Supreme Commander for the win!

  • Oh, I noticed two things.

    a) you only used the nuke weapons. What about T3 and T4 Artillery, and all the huge experimentals? :)

    b) no strategic ICBM subs from supcom shown. Those are way cool

    c) the second explosion is from the ACU that's caught in the blast. I'd have moved it away, because that secondary (similarily huge) blast is not really part of the nuke. :)

    d) someone doesn't like Cybran EMP Flux warheads? :(

  • CnC3 Nukes are WEAK

  • hi!

    the computer where I use Supreme commander is:

    e4300 daily use @3000mhz/zalman 7700/gskill 2x1gb ddr2 800mhz @834mhz 4-4-4-12/evga 7950gx2/ motherboard asus p5b deluxe/audigy4/hd sata2 80gb/master dvd 16x.

  • what computer do you have??

  • bravo, bel video.

  • Who wants a SW thats as cheap as supcoms SWs cnc>supcom

  • any smart player will build anti strategic warhead defense systems...SUPREME COMMANDER > cc

  • LOL MERCIES PWNT YOUR DEFENSEZ NOOB!! Seriously though, yeah anyone with a brain will build Several anti nukes. Then surround them with AA Tech 3 and 2 AA Guns and several shields

  • Cazzusissimo sei il primo italiano che posta un video del genere su youtube!

  • SupCom is way better!!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more