Added: 4 years ago
From: AMDUnprocessed
Views: 32,161
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (139)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 1. It would be so nice if there was 720p 4 years ago.

    2. Who use onboard graphics for games anyway?

  • This guy sounds like stephen hawkins robot voice!!!

  • i have AMD 3.0mhz quad core 8 cach and i like it. i build the computer whit intel dual core 2.cach, in the amd i can not here fan, and in intel the same, but intel give some nose after few minutes my head hearts

  • Intel GMA is shit,shit,shit, it can't handdle anything, you simply CAN'T compare it to anything, is crap,crap,crap, i have tested 2 laptops:one with Core 2 Duo 2GHZ, with GMA 4500 HD, and the other one with Core 2 Duo 1.83GHZ with ATI Radeon HD 3470, and the difference is very BIG, Games run 3X better on ATI than on GMA.

  • im amd/atl and amd/nvidia fan but a little more ati amd fan.

  • That's not fair.Even though i'm an AMD/ATI fan,i think it's stupid to compare an onboard gpu with a regular gpu and then blame the processor for not showing nice colors and frfx.

  • they're both onboard gpu's, they're using an ATI onboard gpu versus an intel onboard gpu.

  • this is bullshit i can run sims 2 beter then core2 duo e6*** series? you suck man,my older pc spect:Intel celeron d331 2.66Ghz,nvidia fx 5200 128 mb,and 512 ddr2 ram,how can you say than that amd can run better then that core2 duo,that mean my old celeron it's better?

  • What the hell is this crap? They use an ATI gpu in the AMD config and an Intel gpu in the Intel config. What the fuck is up with that? Intels gpus are rubbish, that's why they get such a poor performance. It's pretty pathetic that AMD has to make these videos.

  • zup3rboa did u knew that amd bought ati few years ago and that intel is alone so why would in earth amd make they own gpus when they have best gpus in planet ATi gpus

  • they are comparing an intel system to an ati system for a price

  • I know this is 5 months old comment, but they compare it like that because they cost about the same

  • Let's face it, AMD is Much better than Intel.

  • AMD Rules

  • AMD FTW

  • thats bullshit. a processor cant have that much of an impact as he claims unless they have different graphics cards. also intel would thrash amd when it comes to overclocking and stability

  • overclocking yes stability no amd has beter stability with lower percentage when proccesses

    and the pends on the graphics card crossfire or sli and my dad amd machine with about the same cpu out works my intel

  • my X2 is incredibly unstable. i can only overclock it 200mhz without it going unstable. i've never had a problem with intel ever, not even with a celeron.

  • I just watch this video using a intel processer, is that wrong?

  • nothing is wrong the gaming with a intel and amd chip is diffrent but if you have a desktop thats intel u can upgrade the grahpics on intel mother bored can't you? my laptop is a intel bassed mother bored and the graphies comes out way better then the intel chip they have there

  • No, its not wrong, i to just watched this video on my Intel Core 2 Quad Based system with my Nvidia SLI graphics cards ;)

  • yea a high school kid has confidential data sheets from intel and amd....SHUT THE FUCK UP..AND ANY ONE DUMB ENOUGH TO BELIVE YOU..GOD HELP THEM...YOUR ONE THOSE GUYS THAT STANDS THERE AND RUNS YOUR MOUTH RIGHT?...I GUESS NO ONE BROKE IT YET...AND BYE THE WAY I ALSO HAVE AN ATHLON AND IT SUCKS KNOW GO LIE TO SOME ONE ELSE...WHILE I TAKE MY E8500 PAST 4 GHZ

  • ill destroy your silly single core processor in any memory benchmark.

    whats does that chips pull off about 20,000mflops. pffffff.

    i could brake your jaw with 1 hook little cheeky bastard.

  • OK FUCK BOY

  • oh yea by the way my front side bus runs at 2000mhz welcome to the wonderful world of over clocking its not something AMD is to good at

  • lier

  • you have no right to comment with a youtube account like that.

    i think ill close it for you.

  • i bet my athlon is cooler than your E8500 aka single core pentium 4.

  • wow the E8600 will do 4ghz on stock voltage just raise the fsb to 400x10 ha ha ha 4.5ghz...on air with a slight bump of the of the v-core..ha ha ha..5.0ghz on water..and still at safe enough volts to run 24/7...the new 45nm E0 stepping chips hardly seem ((INFERIOR)) who wants a chip that will do 4.5ghz on air...amd boy's eat your fucking heart out

  • intel sucks ass you fucking moron.

    uneducated fuck-up.

  • wow your 10 years old right?..where are your 45 NM cpu's at...oh wait I forgot AMD promised them but never delivered the goods.....yea the AM2 platform has great bandwidth....but do really think intel needs it with CPU'S runing up to 12MB of cash in there chips...just remember IF AMD MAKES IT FIRST..INTEL MAKES IT BETTER..HYPER TRANSPORT YEA WE JACKED IT FOR THE NEW I7 CORES...NOW KEEP PLAYING CATCH UP BITCH...WHILE WE START TAKING OVER THE SEVER MARKET..

  • nice imature insults kid.

    ok... lets start.

    intel,s process is classed as outdated.

    intel,s brand new chips use the same process as the dx2 & the pentium pro for fuck sake.

    intel,s chips share a bus with the ram & i/o system this is a cheap method of creating a processor i cant really tell you much about it just dont fuckin buy them.

    the reson there able to be clocked at suck clock speeds is due to the outdated process i dont give a fyling fuck if there faster.

  • i got a belter for you kid.

    how can you have 4ghz if your full system bus is 1800mhz.

    you uneducated fuck.

    i also got a another peach for you.

    try to burn a dvd & play a game.

  • all intel has done since 1987 is shrink dies.

    retard.

    you did not copy hypertransport on the i7 core chips they went back to the pentium 3, they reduced the fsb to 133mhz.

    the only thing that has changed with the chips you are talking about & thats a intergrated memory controller.

  • i have confidential spreadsheets you will never see.

  • the I7 chips are fucking p3s man.

  • check it for yourself before you comment bad on AMD...

  • AMD could smash intel anyday

  • Intel graphics dung is the need nobody to tell me that I know for a long time.

    Everything apart from the C2D Intel CPUs on the market and had either little usable, or technically obsolete.

  • get an octo-core >.>

  • wow will amd stop lieing

  • no lies. Intel's onboard has always been crap.

  • yea i agree i thought they were comparing to gpus like nvidia lol

  • nothing on the hardware market is "equal"

  • was that not the point of the video?

  • Judging from his language and his spelling prowess, Quinstar is obviously of great intellect and judgement, and no doubt one whose opinion is to be highly regarded.

  • you use his spelling and syntax as an argument against his intellect which is your means of challenging his opinions? irrelevent to the point that it is absurd perhaps follow the lead of the video and present some facts not childish lambasting. i dont think it is logical to call a man ugly in order to convince everyone he smells, if he does it is coincidental. COINCIDENTAL!!

  • NO YOU

  • dude, he is talking about graphics on a buget main stream pc. It doesnt matter if Intel makes better processors, the point was that the platform as a whole, the cpu, motherboard and the integrated graphics combined, AMD's offering surpassed Intel's.

  • 780G = Amazing, I really hope AMD buying Intel will pay off. I love AMD but you could have kicked out B3 phenom a bit earlier. Oh well running a Q6600 @ 4ghz here anyway lol.

  • amd is buying intel ?

  • I hope so. Intel is very expensive and performance/reliability is just the same as AMD processor...

  • finaly some one with a brain on there shoulders although i do think the amdquad is better the the intel quad but forget that finaly some one agrees with me

  • There are only 2 leader in the graphics sector is Nvidia and ATI. So I think if Via graphics chips would still produce, which today would be perhaps a lot better than those of Intel.

  • he is speaking about the integrated video accelerator and the chip set that helps power it.

    This is to show how AMD mainstream machines run Mainstream games better than Intel.

    If you cant understand that, than you are truly clueless.

  • AMD rules integrated graphics because of there ownership of ATI, on the other hand there CPUs suck. Intel is superior in CPU by compatibility in products/price.

  • hahaha intel chipset losers

  • You wise SOBes! are you stupid? how can you compare intel gma 3000 wich is used for laptops mostly with a graphics card from ati? let's see you beat that computer with an nvidia graphics card and then we'll talk!

  • actually, x1250 is derived from x700 (and that is really old) desktop core and is integrated in the chipset. it's not a graphics card... the only thing they added was support for new connectors and HD video playback... it really is the best integrated solution, or rather was, until 780 chipset showed up...

    p.s. 690 is used as chipset/GPU for notebooks as well as g965 is used in desktop machines

  • ur fucking stupid nvidia is not made jus for intel nvidia is jus some company that made good cards for every platform thats y nvidia work jus that same on amd platform probley even better then intel

  • idiot nvidia and ati are the current leaders in graphics right!? so i say nvidia because it's ati's rival and that's what they are trying to show that they are better than they're rivals but didn't use a good graphics because intel doesn't make them for games especially it's like comparing 2 pc's one with a graphic card and one with on-board graphic STFU

  • and btw "NVIDIA and Intel are working together to enhance the end-user computing experience," added Jen-Hsun Huang, president and chief executive officer of NVIDIA

    so nvidia is teaming with intel as amd are with ati... actually amd bought ati

  • "NVIDIA and Intel are working together to enhance the end-user computing experience" That could mean absolutely anything! It could even mean that they are working on a robotic arm that comes out of your computer to pick your nose or scratch your arse!

  • I do 3.7 ghz on my amd LOL!.

    well, thats not the point dudes, cpu isnt doing shit without a graphics card in games.

    Amd is loosing costumers in the highend cpu market, i got the Spider almost complete, i LOVE everything amd have delivered for the spider except cpu, which i dont wanna buy cause they perform worse than my current 5600+ overclocked very high with a very good cooling though, if amd releases a damn 2.6 ghz 45 nm blackedition i will buy it without blinkin my eyes! :p

  • U CAN'T do 3.7 ghz on ur 5600+. No fu*king way!

    I do 3,4 with my 6000+ with the volt on 1,53 AND a Zalman cooler. there is just NO way.

    No even with nitrogen. so.. Bullshit on u ^^

  • u dont know what ur doing then i have 5600+ at 3.4 on air cooling 6000+ and 6400+ r very bad overclockers

  • U CAN'T do 3.7 ghz on ur 5600+. No fu*king way!

    I do 3,4 with my 6000+ with the volt on 1,53 AND a Zalman cooler. there is just NO way.

    No even with nitrogen. so.. Bullshit on u ^^

  • I'm building a new PC and getting an AMD processor

    AMD $193 at 3.2GHz

    what the Intel would have cost

    Intel $259 at 3 GHz

    AMD is the way to go

  • The picture is now becoming clearer. AMD can run Vista well and Intel cannot. While some will argue that Intel has better high end CPUs, when you take an Intel CPU + Intel chipset + Vista you get a lousy experience.

  • integrated graphics ftl

  • My Pc: Intel Q6600 2.4 ghz Nividia 8600GT 512 Ghraphics 3 Gigs of DDR2 Sound Blaster-Extreme sound Card Windows Vista Home Premium Dual-Drive Bays 320 Gig Hard Drive  20" monitor 2 speakers+subwalfers

    My pc is alsome, intel does make the better processers than AMD does, =).

  • nice system but i dont agree with you on the cpu thing

  • Nvidia or amd?

  • ati

  • Ooh, touché! Looks like AMD's top-bods are getting a little bit touchy about Intel wiping the floor in their CPU department. I just LOVE the way it's like "AMD Graphics" Nope, actually they're ATI! Just because you bought the company, doesn't make that company's quality and individualism your own. The fact of the matter is here: Intel's Core CPUs are awesome for gaming compared to AMD's now. Nobody looking for a PC specifically for gaming, would go for any integrated solution anyway.

  • Andrizza, price and operating costs matter when purchasing a new system. Intel puts their memory controller on the motherboard, AMD puts it on the chip itself. Intel's way uses more watts. AMDs solution is cost effective. AMD chips are chosen by gamers because they are scalable, Intel's are not. The Barcelona @ 1.9 Ghz overclocks to 4.7 Ghz

  • dude Barcelona does not overclocks to 4.7GHz the most amd got was 3.0GHz

  • In terms of cost effectiveness, the E8x00 wins hands down. As for the memory controller, intel supports DDR3 today with all their exsiting processors, while you need to buy AM3 processors (which isn't avaliable yet) to use DDR3. Also, 45nm intel chips uses much less power than amd parts period, there is no comparison. (2.5 watts idle, and 27.7 watts at max load, try to beat those numbers!) As mentioned, phenom doesn't reach 4.7hz, while the E8x00 processors can reach 4.0ghz+ with stock cooling!

  • 0602409, how does Intel do it better? This video proves otherwise. Look at the examples they show in the video. AMD continues to produce low cost chips as compared to Intel's more expensive method. 52% of PCs that were sold in 2006 were based on AMD. It's fact, goto Yahoo and search for "AMD outsells Intel"

  • this is bullcrap, im an AMD user till Core2Duos ..

    Sure Intel may lose out to AMD in the integrated solution, but,as a gamer, who would use either AMD or INtel integrated solution anyway?

    whats important is this..

    CPU power wise, Intel's Core2 RAPES AMD's solution

    GPU wise, nVIDIA RAPES AMD's solution

    sure AMD wins in the integrated graphics department, but does that really matter? can it even play 2007 released games?

  • intel just sucks wtf they have to stop the fucking company!!! becuse we dont need somthing from intel they have no technicks and no style intel just need to fuck uf the markt.

  • My older Intel chip still chugged along happily even when it was starting to melt into the heatsink, the AMD I got to replace it struggled at everything. I'm not back with Intel and running the most stable rig I've ever built.

  • Fuck AMD right the Hades back. Intel are rolling AMD around like a cat would a near dead mouse. And noone who's serious about gaming would use an IGM. And for those who spout on that nonsense about AMD being better for overclocking and price? Q6600, bought for 245 euro, runs at idle at about 39-41, on the stock cooler and averages 55-57 on load with games likes WiC on max settings.

  • Sujad, the Q6600 is comprised of two core 2 duo's sitting side-by-side in a package. There's no innovation there. Just regurgitated technology.

  • "AMD killed the Intel star." - Buggles

  • Intel GMA 3000 didn't stand much chance from the beginning. but seriously why would ANY gammers play games on GMA?

  • Why would ANY gamers play games on IGP.

  • I play games on my 780g

    well the only games I play are Nexuiz, WoW and Cand C3

  • how impressive !!!!!!

    amd tells us that the intel chip performs better

    AMD X2 5600 - 2,8 GHZ

    INTEL C2D 6420 - 2,13 GHZ

  • FUCK THE INTEL!!!. Without AMD now we would live with very exspensive pentium 3 mxsimum. With AMD we ve got duo core for 80 baks with very good overclocking.

    AMD! MAKE THE BUS MULTIPLIER FREE!!!

    AMD FOREVER!!!! We with AMD. I ALWAYS buy systems based on AMD to my friends and their friends.

  • FUCK THE INTEL!!!. Without AMD now we would live with very exspensive pentium 3 mxsimum. With AMD we ve got duo core for 80 baks with very good overclocking.

    AMD! MAKE THE BUS MULTIPLIER FREE!!!

    AMD FOREVER!!!! We with AMD. I ALWAYS buy systems based on AMD to my friends and their friends.

  • PRICE/OVERCLOCKING/PERFORMANCE­ -amd the best

  • this is lame and most certainly is not apples to apples. they compare discrete graphics to integrated graphics. seriously, what kind of results to you think you're going to get with that sort of comparison?

  • both are integrated graphics chipsets. I don't know what you were thinking, but they are. Intel just supplies graphics that are good enough. I know this when building computers for those that go Intel, and I usually recommend an add-in graphics card because the integrated is so weak. But of course, Intel will surely try to copy AMD eventually.

  • i think that intel has disabled that functions to improve the framerate. look ak the sims 2 river scene. the ati graphics looks better, okay, but there is no movement. at the intel video the camera is moving. strange, why there is no fps count, would be interesting. if somebody uses embedded graphics for "sims 2" he maybe don't want laggy pixelized cloud shadows which intel does'nt have

  • Do you think that sims players are into gaming, or 12 year old kids, or anyone who doesn't know what a graphics card looks like? If only those you mentioned would be targets for market, both AMD and Intel would be bankcrupt.

  • cmon man he said that himself in the video "we at amd believe in using discrete (standalone) graphics for gaming, but...". that's not the point. he's comparing amd's integrated video to intel's. just cuz it's integrated doesnt mean it has to suck.

  • Buying up a company and calling their chipset your own is easy ;) Developing something from the scratch yourself like Intel is another.

    This clip made my opinion about AMD to drop like hell... What a poor way to discredit someone.

  • AMD/ATI is better. PRICE/PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE/POWER

    Im waiting fusion chips.

  • I do like AMD over Intel because they are better overall but this video takes the cake.

    I am an avid gamer and must say AMD/ATI is taking the right stance on making much better integrated graphics for the average consumer.

    This will increase the amount of PC gamers in the world in the long run.

    Alot of my friends argue, my pc isnt fast enough to play those games but AMD is making is possible to play without a graphics card.

    Kudos to AMD/ATI

  • No real gamer cares about these integrated graphics chipsets. This would only be relevant to Laptops in my opinion!

    Screw both AMD and Intel concerning graphics, go for Nvidia!

  • Thought I love AMD and ATi, I feel I have lost a little respect for AMD after watching this. The funny thing is, this is ATis GPUs. Not AMDs... or, it is now, sicne they bought ATi. Intel have their OWN graphic processors, so there's not much for AMD to really brag about, since it's basically ATi that have done all the work. AMD jsut bought it.

    I am a FanATic and prefer AMD over Intel thought, for some reason.

  • Great point.

  • Thats seems to be an awesome motherboard!

    No need for a graphicscard and no need for a huge powersupply.

  • This just wreaks of desperation.....

  • As a platform AMD has batter solutions in general (SLI anyone?), and now Core 2 isn't better anyomore than X2 price wise except at enthusiast level.

    Anyway Intel graphics are a atrocity, a crime against gamers ...

  • Neither company has consistently produced better products. Its not like BMW vs Kia. Every processor family has specific strengths and weaknesses, as do every processor. You have to compare products in this industry in a very specific manner to be able to honestly point out an indisputable advantage. Consumers need to grow up and take facts for what they are. The performance crown will go back and forth, and I for one have no problem with that.

  • The sad part about it is that Intel is the #1 market share leader in graphics and consumers need to put up with this crap. Every person that bought a Centrino laptop is screwed because they cannot upgrade graphics like they can on a desktop. Intel announced at their partner show this week that they are getting into the high end graphics market to compete with Nvidia and ATI. If they can't play the Sims, how on earth will they compete in this market????

  • Tbh intel never works for me

    AMD Ftw

  • Of course AMD is going to talk smack about graphics (since they bought ATI) because their processors are not nearly as powerful as Intel's Core 2 product line. Please don't take my word for it, go do your own research on any tech site (Tom's HW, Anandtech..) Graphics is the only smoke and mirror trick AMD has left.

  • This isn't about processors its about motherboards with integrated Video and AMD destroys intel in that department because of ATI.. Ther is not doubt C2D's are better processors though

  • Its about platforms. Most people go in a store and buy a cheap pc with IGP video. They think Intel is better because C2D is better but that is not the case.

    1: In the budget and midrange AMD is till king of the hill. Only they dont have a high end part ATM.

    2: You get an Intel G965 IGP when you could have had the 690G from AMD witch still is 2x as fast.

    Overall if you want a cheap pc the AMD is a bit cheaper and thanks to there IGP 2x as fast in 3d games.

  • oh and theres no such thing as K10 ;)

    face it the core 2 line is doomed by november, not even the penryn will save intel

  • I think Penryn will almost perform te same as Agena. Maybe 3.2 Penryn VS 3100 MHz K10.

    But i fear that Nehalem will kill Shanghai. Like C2D beated K8.

  • Not smoke and mirrors

    Core2 is a superior processor to A64, no doubt.

    But A64+690G is a superior standalone (i.e. without add-in cards) PLATFORM to C2+G965.

    Which is actually mostly an accomplishment thanks to ATi efforts, made largely before the acquisition.

    Nevertheless, platforms is where it's at for the mainstream buyer these days.

  • Only Clock for clock. But price performance wise AMD is still better then Intel. AMD only had no High end part at the moment.

    Hopefully Phenom X4 will be here soon.

  • Sorry, but intel has the low end covered, intel pentium dual-core is a series of processors that's sub $100. Also discrete graphics is only good if you're stuck with 640x480, otherwise graphics performance is just subpar.

  • what's the point of this?

    intel just makes mainstream (also known as cheap) embeded graphic chips, nothing to call home about. I'm actually surprised BF2 run so great.

    If you want to play on your pc, you buy a graphics card, and not use crappy on board chips.

  • I'd like to see the uncompressed version of this video. YouTube's compression makes it difficult to discern the differences in many of the examples.

    Nevertheless, AMD's solution seems to be the best choice, by far.

  • unless on board video.

  • how does intel get away with this sh*t? they should be ashamed of themselves. what a bunch of jackasses.

  • Last bit about DVI and HDMI connectors is nonsense, not sure why AMD felt the need to spoil their attack with rubbish at the end. Intel branded boards may not offer DVI or HDMI but Intel Chipset based boards from most mfg are avail with both DVI and HDMI outputs. Would have been interesting to see proper comparison of vid playback qual where iirc Intel is in the lead (gets a much higher HQV score I think)

  • Dude, watch the video carefully. There are no Intel-branded G965 boards that support DVI or HDMI. Those are the boards that are most prevalent. If not, why would Intel have blogged about G965 saying they fixed it? Also, the G965 doesn't natively support DVI or HDMI. They are bolt ons requiring extra chips.

  • Ownage.

    Bust that monopoly!

  • intel is bad nothing i didnt already know just another layer on the cake

  • You're still better off with an Intel machine that uses discreet graphics, even if it's low-end discreet graphics. The cost difference is minimal.

  • Yeah, they bought ATI... no big news here.

  • Haha...as if we needed more proof that Intel SUX! This totally shows just how BAD Intel blows...

  • Even Businessweek says they stink. Actually, they say Intel graphics are wimpy. Search the web for "G965" and "Businessweek" and follow the story. I will paste the intro below: "...The Sims 2 video game on an Intel (INTC ) computer with underpowered (INTC )graphics. If so, the water appears as a featureless patch of monochromatic blue, and many other graphic subtleties of the game are lost..."

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more