@Thebabysealpoacher Mistaken about what? If he was mistaken about who He was, that would make him either a liar or lunatic. If by legend you mean that He never existed, how do you explain all the proof that He left behind. No one could make up such a story and keep the world believing for thousands of years if it never happened.
@dj0174084 no mistaken just means mistaken, he could be right about mani things but not about that, and legend doesnt mean he didt existed it means that he could have existed in an other way or be exagerated bi the tale in the bibble, and futheremore the so called proof is not even solid conclusive evidence, and yes people can be that credule, all im saying is there are othere options
@Thebabysealpoacher If someone truly believes they are something which they aren't, then they are crazy / a lunatic. I don't see any other option there...
If Jesus was just a legend and couldn't really perform miracles, how could so many people be fooled? And how could such a person fulfill so many prophecies with such incredible detail that were written hundreds and hundreds of years before He was even born?
@dj0174084 first you could be mistaken whitout beeng crazy or can you say that everyone that has ever been mistaken about his place in the world or about some fact is actually crazy? and you keep using flawed argument, if he preformed miracles or not, is not in direct consecuence that "so many people belive" (argument for popularity) and for "thousands of years" the popularity nor the age of tha claim make it true, o and in regards of the "fulfillment of profecy"...
2... yes the newer books could have been written to fit allmost perfectly to older books, that doesnt make it true either, remember that solid evidence can not be based on personal feelings, if you can not belive something just because you can is not a valid argument, if you belive something just because you dont accept any other explication is also an invalid argument. leyend and mistaken are still valid
what about, mistaken?, or better yet, legend
Thebabysealpoacher 5 months ago
@Thebabysealpoacher Mistaken about what? If he was mistaken about who He was, that would make him either a liar or lunatic. If by legend you mean that He never existed, how do you explain all the proof that He left behind. No one could make up such a story and keep the world believing for thousands of years if it never happened.
dj0174084 5 months ago
@dj0174084 no mistaken just means mistaken, he could be right about mani things but not about that, and legend doesnt mean he didt existed it means that he could have existed in an other way or be exagerated bi the tale in the bibble, and futheremore the so called proof is not even solid conclusive evidence, and yes people can be that credule, all im saying is there are othere options
Thebabysealpoacher 5 months ago
@Thebabysealpoacher If someone truly believes they are something which they aren't, then they are crazy / a lunatic. I don't see any other option there...
If Jesus was just a legend and couldn't really perform miracles, how could so many people be fooled? And how could such a person fulfill so many prophecies with such incredible detail that were written hundreds and hundreds of years before He was even born?
dj0174084 5 months ago
@dj0174084 first you could be mistaken whitout beeng crazy or can you say that everyone that has ever been mistaken about his place in the world or about some fact is actually crazy? and you keep using flawed argument, if he preformed miracles or not, is not in direct consecuence that "so many people belive" (argument for popularity) and for "thousands of years" the popularity nor the age of tha claim make it true, o and in regards of the "fulfillment of profecy"...
Thebabysealpoacher 5 months ago
2... yes the newer books could have been written to fit allmost perfectly to older books, that doesnt make it true either, remember that solid evidence can not be based on personal feelings, if you can not belive something just because you can is not a valid argument, if you belive something just because you dont accept any other explication is also an invalid argument. leyend and mistaken are still valid
Thebabysealpoacher 5 months ago