In January 2012, tt is great to see how liberals think about the future. Every forecast Stephanie Miller made was completely wrong. She's obnoxious. Couldn't the liberals dig up a better debater? She was owned.
It's interesting to watch this debate in hindsight and how wrong she turned out to be on, pretty much every statement she's made. Obama the economic expert, the political uniter, Iraq the biggest foreign policy blunder in American HISTORY?
Obama just declared the end of the war in Iraq and praised the advance toward democracy and progress as a result.
If this is not a scathing review of the lefts unblemished record of being consistently wrong well...then consider yourself beyond hope and o
Great speaker that Dennis Prager...maybe one day he will decide to be a leader and run for office. In the meantime, let us remember the truly monumental big even scary issues that our world faces....i.e. what goes on daily in our skies since at LEAST 1947 that no one "in control" HAS control over...and will never admit...maybe rightfully so. Makes everything else seem so...insignificant.
I'm ahead of my time. Dump our system of government as well as the judicial system and replace them with a Computer that's programed with the Constitution and Bill of Rights, as that way we can be done with the horribly corrupt human element once and for all. All this money wasted, all these geopolitical "adventures" and general stupidity dictates that the time has arrived to be done with this antiquated means of running a civil country. Just be sure and have blue means to enforce the orders....
I like unpopular ideas, so I am tempted to agree with Dennis that Obama wouldn't have gotten the nomination if he weren't black. There's a lot to that, I'm sure...but I'm not convinced. When you look at his competitors there wasn't much to choose from... Biden was a disaster. Hillary would have been close, but a lot of people hated her, and she is completely devoid of charisma unlike her husband.
Obama was an inspriational speaker, and would be so if he were white as well.
@darwinkilledgod I disagree. I'm on the right. 2008 was the presidential year for any Democrat. If Obama was white, there is no way Hillary would have lost the nomination and in my opinion his lack of experience would have been hammered home. Also, Hillary's unpopularity is with the right, who's votes she would never get anyway. I had little doubt in my mind she or anyone else except Kucinich was going to win but it should have been Clinton not Obama.
hmm.... a long time ago... religious straight people invented a new word. It meant union between a man and a woman.... Now in america, the left want to destroy the rights and respect of these people and the word they created, because the left disagrees with them. When you tell the left you disagree with their intollerance and opression, the left claims you're taking peoples rights away, or some other completely unwaranted and false accusation to hide that they are the ones actually doing it.
I wished I could hear some of the lines better. I listen to Dennis Prager sometimes on his radio show & find that I disagree with him on most things. He has convinced me that marriage is a bad idea, that trusting men is a bad idea, and that trusting the right is the worst idea. You can see that very clearly when he defends cutting taxes for the richest. The idea of same sex marriage will be accepted at some point, I just wonder how long it's going to take until the majority of US allows it.
@libgirl420 There's nothing wrong with same sex marriage. They just have to use a tifferent version of the word marriage. We don't hate gays, we love them! But the word was invented to mean a union between a man and a woman. It is the left that is pushing their ideologies on us! They are the ones stripping our rights away! You are falling for their propaganda so stop being so naive.
I never once said something was wrong with same sex marriage. Obviously I think it's equal to opposite sex marriage. You say I'm following propaganda, but that is not the case. Gay marriage won't shortchange a straight marriage. Some states have already learned and like I said, one day it'll be as accepted as a biracial marriage.
@libgirl420 No. What i am saying is. You claim that christians don't want gay rights. The reality is. I am a christian. I am 100 percent for gay rights. I think gays should be able to get married and have all the rights they want! BUT. They have no right to change our sacred version of the word marriage, that we invented. They can have their marriage, and call it marriage. But they are demanding we change our religious definition of our own marriage. They are the ones oppressing us. See?
First of all I never said ALL people who are christian want to keep gays from having equal rights. It's a value of the right. Just like just because I'm liberal doesn't mean I don't support the death penalty. I feel it's not an equal right if you make them call it by another name, but as long as they can have the exact same rights as a married couple, I don't care what you call it, but many on the right don't think gays should be together at all. Ask the ACLU.
@libgirl420 Well then you and i are in complete agreement. But do not forget. There are factions of the left that are demanding the Christians change the meaning of their word. So the left is not innocent here either.
I don't think we're in complete agreement. I'm perfectly fine with gay marriage being called marriage. I would immediately side with the gay people on this argument.
@libgirl420 I'm perfectly fine with it being called marriage as well. I am not perfectly fine with them demanding the Christians change the definition of their word for marriage.
So don't listen. You know who you hurt? Yourselves. The people who stay locked into the past, unable to progress, are the ones who lose out, and history looks upon them negatively. Just think about how we look at anyone who would dare to suggest that blacks should be dicriminated against. The same will be true of people who discriminate against gays. All it takes is time. Young people tend to be more accepting.
@libgirl420 Hmm. Your precious democrats were the confederates. By 1871 all slave owners were registered dems. Lincoln and the union were the conservatives. They freed the slaves. After this. The dems made jim crowe laws, founded the KKK, and the black panthers. To this day they still use race cards to manipulate naive voters like yourself. So don't sit there and be so foolish as to lecture me on discrimination. Gays and Leftists are discriminating against Christians, bottom line. Deal with it.
We are in the year 2011. Get out of the 1800s. The ones who support women, minorities, gays, and medicare are the democrats. Not the 1800s dems, they're all dead. Times have changed...have you?
@libgirl420 Hm i think the problem here is your basic reading comprehension skills are in serious need. You just can't wrap your head around something very simple. You have no idea what i have said to you. It's like im saying the sky is blue. And you are saying you disagree with red skies. Maybe its your blind hatred of all things Christian. I'm not sure. But i have great sympathy for you, i just want you to know that.
No I get what you're saying and I'm horrified. I don't hate all things christian, my 2 best friends are christian. Many people I love and respect are christian, and I don't spend all my time discussing religion and politics with them. We get along just fine. I just don't like religion. The religion I have the most sympathy for would the Jewish, simply because they've been slaughtered so many times. Plus they don't say everyone is going to hell, or knock on my door.
@libgirl420 I really wish the liberals would quit attacking the state of israel. And quit supporting the jihad'ers that want to exterminate the jews, and would cut a woman's head off in the blink of an eye for something as menial as driving.
I'm liberal and I don't do that. I support a democratic Israel. They are a wonderful ally to have. I haven't raised any objection to them doing what they have to do to protect their national security. I may not like religion but I don't hate all people who are religious. I cried when I read some holocaust books as a kid, and I don't need religion to know what's right here.
Except that many take it as an insult and can't smile about it like you, but I appreciate your attempt to talk it through rather than having a class A hissy fit.
@libgirl420 If i start a religion, called the religion of "Bob". And i make up a word pertaining to my religion. The word "Beb" and that word means the color blue. Do you have the right to come tell me that i am not allowed to do this? Do you have the right to come tell me i have to change the word to mean the color red instead?
What the heck are you talking about? Your analogy is lacking and so are your arguments. I don't care what religion you are, just don't expect me to join your cult.
@libgirl420 All it comes down to. Is Give the gays their rights! We have no problem with that! But we don't want them to start stepping and thrashing on our sacred words by forcing us to change the meanings! Then calling us the bigots!
Sacred? Ha! The divorce rate suggests that people DON'T find it to be very sacred. Divorce steps on and thrashes marriage more than two gay people getting married. Canada allows gay marriage and they aren't suffering for it, and neither are straight marriages. Marriage is about 2 people falling in love and entering into a contract together. The sexes of the partners doesn't matter at all.
@libgirl420 You do not have the mental capacity to understand what i just said. - They want to change the meaning of the sacred religious version of the word. Christians could care less if gays get married. But the gays are trying to step on our sacred traditions. People aren't perfect of course they get divorced. But quit being so ignorant. I am a christian in support of gay marriage. But i will be damned if a gay changes the deffinition of my religion's sacred word. THAT is oppression.
The moment you call it SACRED, I roll my eyes and can't take you seriously. If it's so sacred, then WHY so much divorce? Don't even pretend that gay people getting married steps on anything sacred or religious. There is marriage by religion and marriage by law. The way you describe the word, it takes on an ugly and ominous feeling, and marriage feels more like crap than like anything sacred. Marriage should be about 2 people in love entering into a love contract. :)
@libgirl420 What i am telling you is very very simple. pay attention. In the gospels, marriage is a holy sacrement. In the gospels, marriage means union between man and woman. In the gospels, mankind has some serious flaws and needed a savior, so of course people will get divorced, that's the point of a savior. ----- There are factions of the left demanding that religions change the meaning of the holy sacrement. That is called opression and a violation of rights. Divorce has no impact.
Blah blah blah. I don't care about religion, I don't care about christian gospels anymore than I care about the quran. They're all BS, and science already proves the bible wrong in Genesis. Plus the religious crap has no place in government. Our constitution and Declaration of Independence were very clear. The government cannot promote any one type of religion, they are to be secular. People can be religious, but our courts make sure the gov't doesn't get religious.
@libgirl420 Exactly. The left is trying to use the state/government as a means of opressing the religion of christianity, by forcing them to change words that are sacred to them. --------- For the record, Science supports genesis. The solar day was not mentioned until after the book of genesis. The ancient hebrew used for 'day' in genesis was literally a complete phase for a begining and and end sufficing a completion. host of many other things as well. Adam literally means mankind.
No science doesn't support genesis. The bible claims humans were here within 7 days of the earth being created. Even if a day is like 1000 years in "god's time" humans were not on earth within 7000 years of the earliest creatures. Dinosaurs lived billions of years prior to us. Which means genesis is wrong.
@libgirl420 Actually if you read genesis in the native hebrew the jews wrote it in, it pretty much says the earth is several billion years old and the universe was around for 13 billion years before the earth came about. Non-christian scholars talk a bout it all the time.
Well now you're changing your story. You just said you believe the tall tale about adam & eve and now you're claiming something that isn't even in the bible. The bible isn't moral enough for me. With there being nothing about thall shalt not rape and thall shalt not have sex with children in the ten commandments, I just can't take it seriously. The bible promotes treating women like they're less than men. Reading the bible made me feel a whole lot of disgust.
@libgirl420 There's a lot of disgusting stuff in the bible libgirl420. In fact, the single biggest critic in history of the bible, or the laws therein, was a man named Yohushua, we know him today as Jesus Christ and he is the foundation of the Christian faith.
I see. You refuse to argue based on equal rights/constitution & so you're going to stick to JC. Do you know what JC ever had to say on the issues of how to treat others? I think once christians tackle these types of simple issues & ace them, they shouldn't act so high and mighty when it comes to the rights of who in love can get married. When you're on the sidelines of religion, you come to see just how nasty it is, with a layer of charity on top to make it look good.
@libgirl420 Hm. I just destroyed your arguments with constitutional and rights based logic. I'll do it again. Christians have the right to keep their word for marriage the way they want to. Gays have the right to keep their word for marriage the way they want to. But gays have no right to tell Christians to change their word. Need me to destroy you again? And are there any more false straw men arguments you'd like to bring up in an act of desperation? It's quite funny.
Haha you think you destroyed me? You don't own the word marriage. If the law decides to use that word to bring together a union of 2 people of the same sex, there's nothing you can do about it. Your church can choose to not do those ceremonies, but there's nothing honorable about being a biggot to gays. The Jews in Massachusetts can get married by a rabbi ALREADY. Your argument has already been proven wrong in more than 1 state. Guess you're...destroyed?
@libgirl420 No no no no. The lefties are making the claim that they own the christian defenition of the word. The church doesnt care if gays get married or use the word marriage. What the church cares about is being forced by non-church members to re-write t he defenition of their word. It's an attack on the churches rights.
Well the church should change the definition to update itself with the times, just as the catholic church has made revisions in the past 100 years. Babies no longer go to purgatory, YAY! (sarcasm) You hold onto your sanctimonious attitude, because people are walking away from churches in droves. Atheism has at least doubled in the past 15 years. People don't like your message.
@libgirl420 You are being intollerant on the church and imposing your opinions on it. yet in the same breadth you will make the claim is just the opposite. This is called hypocrisy. --- On the same token. I fear i care more about the rights of women and minorities than you do. It's very sad how gullible people are these days.
I was very careful to say the church should...rather than the church must. I support the church staying in the stone ages. More and more people can grow out of religion that much easier if it's constantly trying to oppress us. Then we will know who the true winners are.
@libgirl420 Indeed people are walking away from churches in droves. It's called the falling away, and it was prophecised of 1900 years ago, as was the re-enstatement of the state of israel, and the nations gathering against her.
Uh huh, excuses. I've seen how church prophecy is played out. If you wait thousands enough years, stuff in the bible might come true. That kind of thinking I left behind a long time ago. I think if churches want to keep getting donations, they should be more welcoming. That's my point.
@libgirl420 It's time for you to make a decision. Stand on a side. The side of reason. Or the side of propaganda and dictatorship. You choose. I've made my choice.
She should be very grateful that the time ran out before Prager could respond to her simplistic comments about the Old Testament. He is an expert in Jewish theology. SMH.
I love that one of the first questions was "Why are Republicans so mean spirited?" and then the Leftist continues the debate by inuslting both McCain and Palin, if you disagree with her you are obviously a homophobe. Mr Prager used ONE negative adjective and that was that word" stupid". So who is actually being mean spirited?
Miller is cute but obviously doesn't have too much going on upstairs. She clearly didn't stand a chance against Prager. I love her comment about how capable Obama would be on the economy. Stephanie, would you like to retract that statement?
This is really no contest. Stephanie Miller's show consist of name calling and potty humor. Dennis Prager's show consists of Philosophical discussions and serious topics. Why on earth would anyone think that Miller stood a chance against the intellectual superiority of Prager.
Stephanie Miller is a good liberal debater. Calling names, making ad hominem fallacies, insulting the other side, and engaging in Ageism. She gets an A+ in the liberal playbook, doesn't she?
This is a non-contest. This woman's constant appeal to emotion and the issuing of name calling and vulgarities characterizes the left perfectly. She is a mental midget compared to Mr. Prager.
This woman is just vulgar. Dennis Prager is conducting himself with such class, I feel like I should lose some respect for him (just a smidgen) for consenting to partake in this farce in the first place. The reason I have not lost any respect for Ms. Miller is because I never had any for her in the first place.
I was always puzzled as to how Stephanie Miller achieved any sort of success in anything. She's like Ryan Seacrest....what is her skill exactly? I think they both have the world's greatest agent. Maybe it's the same agent?
Dennis is a master debater and so intellectual as well as polite. Miller acts like a complete fool. I can't even respect what she says because of her demeanor. What a complete idiot she is. Not to mention she has no idea what she is saying.
I happen to be a gunsmith. Do you know how many patents exist for guns that routinely blow up? There is an endless list of patents for gun which are a greater danger to the shooter than to anyone else.
It's amazing how childish the remarks are from the left. Prager didn't even attack her or belittle her, and he still won the debate. Most of her debate was filled with insults and name calling.
It was like watching a grown up debating a 10 year old.
So now we see who runs from truth like a vampire from garlic don't we 'darwinkilledgod'.
You've shown how much you know about "evolutionary biology", why not join the faux news comedy team like prager and give us all a laugh, keep showing us your business acumen.
Take a look at the Christopher Hitchens vs Dennis Prager debate in the related videos to the right of your screen, to see just how easily Prager (and any other conservative) falls apart when faced with facts.
@Getsen42 Prager's beliefs about religion easily fall apart when basic scientific questions are asked. The same cannot be said for his arguments for nuclear power, against left wing appeasement of dictators, for the war in Iraq (see Hitchens on that again), and for enhanced interrogation techniques.
Stephanie looked absolutely childish, the fact she's even on the same stage as prager blows my mind, he can't even respond to someone that simplistic.
Each year just one French nuclear power plant produces 15,000 tons of depleted uranium. This is then shipped to Russia where it is stored in contaminated, unsafe areas around Siberia.
Eventually, many will die as the leaks occur. Most nuclear waste has a couple thousand years of activity. It is simple to keep an eye on a dangerous storage of anything here on earth for thousands of years isn't it.
Dennis Preggo is a liar and a shill for idiocy (reich-wingers).
Thank you Getsen42 for supporting his point about left wingers being more abnoxious and calling people names. Also your claim that people will die is vague and unsupported by the evidence.
@Getsen42 The beginning of intelligence is recognizing tradeoffs. Yes, nuclear waste is bad. But on the other hand, energy is good! So at this point, if your mind hasn't exploded, you must realize that some tradeoff exists between them. The question remains, how much danger are we willing to tolerate for how much energy? Nuclear waste is, considering alternatives, extremely safe!
The beginning of intelligence is recognizing the need to stay on the topic of discussion which is not intelligence, nor its beginning but rather nuclear waste/energy pros vs cons.
A 20 hp sterling engine powered by a 2'x4' fresnel lens for each home can if properly administered, take each and every household off the grid for 5grand.
Why won't this happen for 50 years?
Because there is 50 years of oil left for the robber barons to make $ with.
@Getsen42 I was on topic, if you can't see that...well then, you can't see that.
Your conspiracy theory beliefs about fresnel lens are unbelievable: 1) make one for me and I'll buy it for $5000. This isn't a meaningless talking point. I will literally pay you $5000 if you can make a product that powers my brother's house for years on end.
2) Why doesn't one of the greedy oil companies make this device, patent it, and sell it for a huge mark up to environmentalists?
@Getsen42 I don't believe you, why would I give you a cent? In the real world (contrasted with the conspiracy theory ego-scratching back allies of the internet) you take a risk when you try to create a new product, betting it will work and be cost effective. You would have me believe that every person capable of making this invention is too lazy to make millions of dollars on it.
@Getsen42 Do you have an argument or should I take that as you acknowledging that you were wrong? Do you believe greedy corporations could make tons of money on your invent but choose not to? Do you believe oil companies are so powerful that they control literally every other corporation on the planet so that none of them are able to buy your idea and make money? What exactly is your point?
Now the final insult....to be questioned about my "point" by an idiot who doesn't even know about 18th century technology and in typical arrogant amurikkkan style, can't read or comprehend or realize that I have a fresnel, a stirling engine, a hydrogen electrolyzer and a ford pickup that runs on biodiesel....
Yes, you typical youtube commenter, i have a point.
@Getsen42 I have a PhD in evolutionary biology and have published in two of the world's leading scientific journals. Calling me an "idiot" just doesn't do anything to me, sorry.
And so if I can derive your point (because you again haven't stated it) it is that the evil oil companies are suppressing technology that already exists and is regularly used by a number of people around the world... Huh? Seriously...your point is what?
Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life here....
You are published? Me too...
Here's a taste.
Isaiah J. Fidler, Jerry Y. Tsao, Steve Davis, Akihiko Nii, and Eugenie S. Kleinerman. Activated Human Blood Monocytes Trigger The Antitumor Activity of Blood Polymorphonuclear Cells. Lymphokine Research 1989. Volume 8. Issue No. 4. Pages 427-437.
@Getsen42 I'm still waiting to hear your point... You waste a lot of your space with boring repetitious jokes and intellectually bankrupt jokes. What is your point? How do the oil companies keep this beautiful and profitable technology off the market? Why aren't there greedy capitalists making monkey off it?
@malthuskilleddarwin, the only waste for me is communicating with someone like you. Call Mark Kress and ask him if there is an anti-MENSA society you can join....
@Getsen42 Another personal attack and humorless joke... still awaiting your point. I hope those reading the comments can see how easy it is to expose libral nonsense: make the slightest inquiry into their reasoning and all they have is name-calling and feeble attempts at humor. What took place between Getsen42 and I was very much like the video.
@darwinkilledgod , Yes, please youtube viewers, note how this idiot has to have a point repeated so he can tell his friends what he reads from my pen and then claim it is his knowledge. Why not just put a big sign behind you, "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" as you live in your conservative delusion?
But...here ya go simpleton - per capita in the U.S., citizens use on average 17,147 lb of oil equivalent per year. At 42 gallons per barrel, and 5.78 million btu/barrel, and 1700 kWh/barrel (continued)
it is easy to see that an average U.S. home consumes 1356 kWh/month which is roughly 45.2 kWh/day. Now, a 16 horsepower generator produces a continuous peak/rated output of 8.75 kW so then if we run it for 6 hours, we cover the use for each home, no? Six hours is about the amount of sunlight available excluding night and cloud cover so as I said up-thread, a 20 hp Stirling engine powered by a 2' x 4' fresnel lens would take all homes off the grid.
@Getsen42 Thanks for finally making a point. Now, could you explain again why you're not a billionnaire for selling this cheap and effective energy generating system to everyone in the US? Is it that corporations are just not greedy enough to sell a superior product?
@Getsen42 (part 2) Option a) your calculations miss important costs and thus the free market hasn't selected your alternative, or b) there are billions of dollars to be made but no one (including you) bothers to make them. Am I missing a third alternative?
@darwinkilledgod , just like a simpleton conservative to think in black and white.
ONLY two alternatives in your little peanut.
How very typical.
Go ahead, do your own research, realize that I'm correct and go tell everyone it was your idea just like all conservatives do in the business environment.
ps. THERE IS NO FREE MARKET. Just the rich and the poor and here's a stat that I'd like you to poke a hole in while you are chatting in front of all the youtube viewers.....the scholar Kotlikoff, in 1988 concluded that 65-80% of U.S. wealth is inherited....how's that for popping your U.S. freemarket bubble on where people get their money? See the book, Inheritance of Wealth by Jens Beckert.
@Getsen42 More insults, more jokes, more threats...no answer as usual. What was that about conservatives being hateful? You still haven't answered the simple question of why greedy businessmen haven't made money on your idea.
By the way, free market and inheritance of wealth are not opposites! If you earn money and don't spend it...who should get it?
@darwinkilledgod, frame this all day long as if I have to answer your silly questions again and again. I answered your questions and gave you real energy solutions for not using nuke power. You act like the answers below don't exist. Now you'll answer my questions.
How can "greedy businessmen" make money on my idea, when I haven't told them about it, I've only told an "evolutionary biologist"?
Why do you ask such a silly question if you have a PhD?
@Getsen42 You claim you know how to provide cheaper more efficient energy; assuming people in the energy business also have this idea, then there's a reason they aren't acting on it. You haven't said why. Perhaps you believe they just haven't thought of it, in which case tell them! More likely, you don't know what you're talking about.
@darwinkilledgod you idiot. Give me a valid email address and I'll show you some i.p. that your small mind could barely comprehend. It has a provisional patent and was sold for $100k. Guess who the inventor of a green method of producing Hydrazine for reprocessing control rods and for use in hypergolic drive systems as rocket fuel is? Not you, you dimwit, ME. That's right, shit for brains, when you say I don't know what I'm talking about, you only show more idiocy....what's your email?
@Getsen42 More insults... Patents don't mean the product works effectively. Take your yummy patent and go sell it to a greedy bank or oil company that believes it's efficient. They'll pay you lots of money (which you'll deserve) and make this wonderful product for all of us. Why waste your time on youtube?
@Getsen42 I don't ask silly questions, I ask plain direct questions...like a scientist. The fact that you don't have answers - only jokes and insults - does not mean the questions are silly. You've added a third alternative: a) you're wrong, b) businessmen don't want to make money, and now c) no one knows about your genius world changing idea.
@Getsen42 RE: inheritance. Not that it's relevant, but the average estate tax in the US is 30% which means it is mathematically impossible for 80% of the US wealth to be inherited. It also implies that wealthy people spend less than 20% of what they earn, which is obviously nonsense, and if not, who cares if people inherit money they're not spending it.
@Getsen42 In point in fact, you didn't provide a reference, you just dropped a name. A reference is to a journal article not a person...but whatever. I don't care about the inheritance issue.
I happen to think calling a veteran war prisoner who has served his country for decades "Grampy" is as insulting as calling a black person "Niggy" but perhaps I'm wrong.
She did not destroy Prager, she made mindless comments like, "Democrats are right about everything", "Republicans are hateful...and racist", "Obama beat up McCain in the debate". It was very dull.
@darwinkilledgod Ok then heres your test, Go up to an old black man and call him Grampy and see what happens then call him a Niggy or whatever dumbshyt racist name you are Brave enough to still use and see if he doesn't get up and smack the plaque off your teeth. LOL
@darwinkilledgod The right wing has been bashing Mccain for a LONG TIME. In fact, they viewed his age as a major contributing factor in his loss to Obama. BTW, don't play the veteran card. The right wing presents itself as being concerned for the well being of our troops, AS LONG AS THEY ARE REPUBLICAN. Ask Kerry how the right wing treats our boys.
It's worse than that, it's Grampy McSane or something like that. She makes his point repeatedly by resorting to mindless cheerleading and petty half-humorous insults.
I am still waiting for Miller to make a meaningful statement with at least some degree of merit or validity. Her efforts to hide her intellectual incompetence with petty humor are sadly in vain.
I didn't recognize Stephanie without the wacky sound effects. But then in her first sentence she belittled John McCain for being old, and then I recognized her immediately. Though, I admit she is gorgeous on the outside.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
How about how the Bush Administration shredded the Constitution. Both those war criminlas Bush and Cheney made a mockery of the Constitution and every apect of our government.
to get people into a mess the GOP will use simple catch phrases like "Kill terrorists" "Gov't is communism" but that's to get you to do stuff...once people find out it's all a lie and the picture is not so simple, the GOP will come out with large long drawn out arguments trying to cover its asses, but it won't work. Liberals have always stuck to the same message, which is easy to understand because the problem is so obvious it should have been avoided if people just used some common sense
Prager is so intellectual honest. Miller has no clue how to debate. All she can do is make wise cracks and sling insults. Prager is a deep thinker and very intellectual. Miller is shallow and out of her league in debating Prager.
Where are those economists now,that believe Obama had the best grasp on the economy? Obama is a communist ,did they not know that then?And the church that B.O.went to,did white people know that you didn't even have to be a Christian to join?Many practicing Muslims belonged to that church.The only thing that you had to believe to join,was you had to look at the white man as the enemy and agree that he must be destroyed,just like their doctrine proclaims.
MrTabby500, you state that he is a zionist jew as if it reveals some self-evident truth that means something. What is your point?
If I said you were from Ohio should we all nod our heads knowingly and draw meaningful conclusions about your character or veracity based on such a statement?
Your remark echoes that of very ignorant people and I'm not sure you are one of those.
He supports the crimes of Israel against the Palestinians.Israels mythical holy land is that MYTHICAL,the bible is mythology and god as christians believe in him doesnt exist.
MrTabby5000, most of the zionists who worked for and obtained League of Nations authorization to establish the State of Israel were, in fact, not religious and some would agree with you that G-d is mythical. Even if someone claims that the region was promised to them by G-d, that is not how Israel was created. It was created entirely by a secular body, the League of Nations, which was putting into action the contents of the Balfour Declaration set forth by Great Britain, another secular body.
Christopher HItchens and Dennis Prager agree on most issues. They're both conservative. Their only disagreement is religion. So I don't believe anyone should be debating which one is more intellectual. They're both eloquent speakers and intelligent.
God bless Mr. Prager
D3uscaritas3st 5 days ago
In January 2012, tt is great to see how liberals think about the future. Every forecast Stephanie Miller made was completely wrong. She's obnoxious. Couldn't the liberals dig up a better debater? She was owned.
Blakeps3 1 week ago
It's interesting to watch this debate in hindsight and how wrong she turned out to be on, pretty much every statement she's made. Obama the economic expert, the political uniter, Iraq the biggest foreign policy blunder in American HISTORY?
Obama just declared the end of the war in Iraq and praised the advance toward democracy and progress as a result.
If this is not a scathing review of the lefts unblemished record of being consistently wrong well...then consider yourself beyond hope and o
Jblod240 3 weeks ago
I love Stephanie Miller
Oddityworld 3 months ago
Great speaker that Dennis Prager...maybe one day he will decide to be a leader and run for office. In the meantime, let us remember the truly monumental big even scary issues that our world faces....i.e. what goes on daily in our skies since at LEAST 1947 that no one "in control" HAS control over...and will never admit...maybe rightfully so. Makes everything else seem so...insignificant.
PatrickDaLegendary 3 months ago
the crowd is awful
beksinski 3 months ago
god she is irritating.
romanpr1nce 6 months ago 3
what an annoying lady....looks like Everybody loves Raymonds Wife
cdtorres1980 6 months ago
I'm ahead of my time. Dump our system of government as well as the judicial system and replace them with a Computer that's programed with the Constitution and Bill of Rights, as that way we can be done with the horribly corrupt human element once and for all. All this money wasted, all these geopolitical "adventures" and general stupidity dictates that the time has arrived to be done with this antiquated means of running a civil country. Just be sure and have blue means to enforce the orders....
guyNbluejeans 6 months ago
Comment removed
guyNbluejeans 6 months ago
I like unpopular ideas, so I am tempted to agree with Dennis that Obama wouldn't have gotten the nomination if he weren't black. There's a lot to that, I'm sure...but I'm not convinced. When you look at his competitors there wasn't much to choose from... Biden was a disaster. Hillary would have been close, but a lot of people hated her, and she is completely devoid of charisma unlike her husband.
Obama was an inspriational speaker, and would be so if he were white as well.
darwinkilledgod 7 months ago
@darwinkilledgod I disagree. I'm on the right. 2008 was the presidential year for any Democrat. If Obama was white, there is no way Hillary would have lost the nomination and in my opinion his lack of experience would have been hammered home. Also, Hillary's unpopularity is with the right, who's votes she would never get anyway. I had little doubt in my mind she or anyone else except Kucinich was going to win but it should have been Clinton not Obama.
Onepersonsopinion 1 month ago
That woman is too obnoxious. And next to a gentleman like Prager it just makes her look worse.
downeybill 7 months ago 6
hmm.... a long time ago... religious straight people invented a new word. It meant union between a man and a woman.... Now in america, the left want to destroy the rights and respect of these people and the word they created, because the left disagrees with them. When you tell the left you disagree with their intollerance and opression, the left claims you're taking peoples rights away, or some other completely unwaranted and false accusation to hide that they are the ones actually doing it.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
obama won from his popularity
stupid people voted for him, and he won
all that means is that more and more stupid, ignorant people live in this country
i love the USA.. but it is seriously going down the shitter
kalahauoli355 7 months ago
I wished I could hear some of the lines better. I listen to Dennis Prager sometimes on his radio show & find that I disagree with him on most things. He has convinced me that marriage is a bad idea, that trusting men is a bad idea, and that trusting the right is the worst idea. You can see that very clearly when he defends cutting taxes for the richest. The idea of same sex marriage will be accepted at some point, I just wonder how long it's going to take until the majority of US allows it.
libgirl420 8 months ago
@libgirl420 There's nothing wrong with same sex marriage. They just have to use a tifferent version of the word marriage. We don't hate gays, we love them! But the word was invented to mean a union between a man and a woman. It is the left that is pushing their ideologies on us! They are the ones stripping our rights away! You are falling for their propaganda so stop being so naive.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
I never once said something was wrong with same sex marriage. Obviously I think it's equal to opposite sex marriage. You say I'm following propaganda, but that is not the case. Gay marriage won't shortchange a straight marriage. Some states have already learned and like I said, one day it'll be as accepted as a biracial marriage.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 No. What i am saying is. You claim that christians don't want gay rights. The reality is. I am a christian. I am 100 percent for gay rights. I think gays should be able to get married and have all the rights they want! BUT. They have no right to change our sacred version of the word marriage, that we invented. They can have their marriage, and call it marriage. But they are demanding we change our religious definition of our own marriage. They are the ones oppressing us. See?
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
First of all I never said ALL people who are christian want to keep gays from having equal rights. It's a value of the right. Just like just because I'm liberal doesn't mean I don't support the death penalty. I feel it's not an equal right if you make them call it by another name, but as long as they can have the exact same rights as a married couple, I don't care what you call it, but many on the right don't think gays should be together at all. Ask the ACLU.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 Well then you and i are in complete agreement. But do not forget. There are factions of the left that are demanding the Christians change the meaning of their word. So the left is not innocent here either.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
I don't think we're in complete agreement. I'm perfectly fine with gay marriage being called marriage. I would immediately side with the gay people on this argument.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 I'm perfectly fine with it being called marriage as well. I am not perfectly fine with them demanding the Christians change the definition of their word for marriage.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
So don't listen. You know who you hurt? Yourselves. The people who stay locked into the past, unable to progress, are the ones who lose out, and history looks upon them negatively. Just think about how we look at anyone who would dare to suggest that blacks should be dicriminated against. The same will be true of people who discriminate against gays. All it takes is time. Young people tend to be more accepting.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 Hmm. Your precious democrats were the confederates. By 1871 all slave owners were registered dems. Lincoln and the union were the conservatives. They freed the slaves. After this. The dems made jim crowe laws, founded the KKK, and the black panthers. To this day they still use race cards to manipulate naive voters like yourself. So don't sit there and be so foolish as to lecture me on discrimination. Gays and Leftists are discriminating against Christians, bottom line. Deal with it.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
We are in the year 2011. Get out of the 1800s. The ones who support women, minorities, gays, and medicare are the democrats. Not the 1800s dems, they're all dead. Times have changed...have you?
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 Hm i think the problem here is your basic reading comprehension skills are in serious need. You just can't wrap your head around something very simple. You have no idea what i have said to you. It's like im saying the sky is blue. And you are saying you disagree with red skies. Maybe its your blind hatred of all things Christian. I'm not sure. But i have great sympathy for you, i just want you to know that.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
No I get what you're saying and I'm horrified. I don't hate all things christian, my 2 best friends are christian. Many people I love and respect are christian, and I don't spend all my time discussing religion and politics with them. We get along just fine. I just don't like religion. The religion I have the most sympathy for would the Jewish, simply because they've been slaughtered so many times. Plus they don't say everyone is going to hell, or knock on my door.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 Yeah the jews have it real rough.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
Yes they do.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 I really wish the liberals would quit attacking the state of israel. And quit supporting the jihad'ers that want to exterminate the jews, and would cut a woman's head off in the blink of an eye for something as menial as driving.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
I'm liberal and I don't do that. I support a democratic Israel. They are a wonderful ally to have. I haven't raised any objection to them doing what they have to do to protect their national security. I may not like religion but I don't hate all people who are religious. I cried when I read some holocaust books as a kid, and I don't need religion to know what's right here.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 amen sista yo yo yo word what it do
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
I didn't understand that.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 Copying is the biggest form of flattery :)
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
Except that many take it as an insult and can't smile about it like you, but I appreciate your attempt to talk it through rather than having a class A hissy fit.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 If i start a religion, called the religion of "Bob". And i make up a word pertaining to my religion. The word "Beb" and that word means the color blue. Do you have the right to come tell me that i am not allowed to do this? Do you have the right to come tell me i have to change the word to mean the color red instead?
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
What the heck are you talking about? Your analogy is lacking and so are your arguments. I don't care what religion you are, just don't expect me to join your cult.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 All it comes down to. Is Give the gays their rights! We have no problem with that! But we don't want them to start stepping and thrashing on our sacred words by forcing us to change the meanings! Then calling us the bigots!
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
Sacred? Ha! The divorce rate suggests that people DON'T find it to be very sacred. Divorce steps on and thrashes marriage more than two gay people getting married. Canada allows gay marriage and they aren't suffering for it, and neither are straight marriages. Marriage is about 2 people falling in love and entering into a contract together. The sexes of the partners doesn't matter at all.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 You do not have the mental capacity to understand what i just said. - They want to change the meaning of the sacred religious version of the word. Christians could care less if gays get married. But the gays are trying to step on our sacred traditions. People aren't perfect of course they get divorced. But quit being so ignorant. I am a christian in support of gay marriage. But i will be damned if a gay changes the deffinition of my religion's sacred word. THAT is oppression.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
The moment you call it SACRED, I roll my eyes and can't take you seriously. If it's so sacred, then WHY so much divorce? Don't even pretend that gay people getting married steps on anything sacred or religious. There is marriage by religion and marriage by law. The way you describe the word, it takes on an ugly and ominous feeling, and marriage feels more like crap than like anything sacred. Marriage should be about 2 people in love entering into a love contract. :)
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 What i am telling you is very very simple. pay attention. In the gospels, marriage is a holy sacrement. In the gospels, marriage means union between man and woman. In the gospels, mankind has some serious flaws and needed a savior, so of course people will get divorced, that's the point of a savior. ----- There are factions of the left demanding that religions change the meaning of the holy sacrement. That is called opression and a violation of rights. Divorce has no impact.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
Blah blah blah. I don't care about religion, I don't care about christian gospels anymore than I care about the quran. They're all BS, and science already proves the bible wrong in Genesis. Plus the religious crap has no place in government. Our constitution and Declaration of Independence were very clear. The government cannot promote any one type of religion, they are to be secular. People can be religious, but our courts make sure the gov't doesn't get religious.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 Exactly. The left is trying to use the state/government as a means of opressing the religion of christianity, by forcing them to change words that are sacred to them. --------- For the record, Science supports genesis. The solar day was not mentioned until after the book of genesis. The ancient hebrew used for 'day' in genesis was literally a complete phase for a begining and and end sufficing a completion. host of many other things as well. Adam literally means mankind.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
No science doesn't support genesis. The bible claims humans were here within 7 days of the earth being created. Even if a day is like 1000 years in "god's time" humans were not on earth within 7000 years of the earliest creatures. Dinosaurs lived billions of years prior to us. Which means genesis is wrong.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 Actually if you read genesis in the native hebrew the jews wrote it in, it pretty much says the earth is several billion years old and the universe was around for 13 billion years before the earth came about. Non-christian scholars talk a bout it all the time.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
Well now you're changing your story. You just said you believe the tall tale about adam & eve and now you're claiming something that isn't even in the bible. The bible isn't moral enough for me. With there being nothing about thall shalt not rape and thall shalt not have sex with children in the ten commandments, I just can't take it seriously. The bible promotes treating women like they're less than men. Reading the bible made me feel a whole lot of disgust.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 There's a lot of disgusting stuff in the bible libgirl420. In fact, the single biggest critic in history of the bible, or the laws therein, was a man named Yohushua, we know him today as Jesus Christ and he is the foundation of the Christian faith.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
I see. You refuse to argue based on equal rights/constitution & so you're going to stick to JC. Do you know what JC ever had to say on the issues of how to treat others? I think once christians tackle these types of simple issues & ace them, they shouldn't act so high and mighty when it comes to the rights of who in love can get married. When you're on the sidelines of religion, you come to see just how nasty it is, with a layer of charity on top to make it look good.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 Hm. I just destroyed your arguments with constitutional and rights based logic. I'll do it again. Christians have the right to keep their word for marriage the way they want to. Gays have the right to keep their word for marriage the way they want to. But gays have no right to tell Christians to change their word. Need me to destroy you again? And are there any more false straw men arguments you'd like to bring up in an act of desperation? It's quite funny.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
Haha you think you destroyed me? You don't own the word marriage. If the law decides to use that word to bring together a union of 2 people of the same sex, there's nothing you can do about it. Your church can choose to not do those ceremonies, but there's nothing honorable about being a biggot to gays. The Jews in Massachusetts can get married by a rabbi ALREADY. Your argument has already been proven wrong in more than 1 state. Guess you're...destroyed?
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 No no no no. The lefties are making the claim that they own the christian defenition of the word. The church doesnt care if gays get married or use the word marriage. What the church cares about is being forced by non-church members to re-write t he defenition of their word. It's an attack on the churches rights.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
Well the church should change the definition to update itself with the times, just as the catholic church has made revisions in the past 100 years. Babies no longer go to purgatory, YAY! (sarcasm) You hold onto your sanctimonious attitude, because people are walking away from churches in droves. Atheism has at least doubled in the past 15 years. People don't like your message.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 You are being intollerant on the church and imposing your opinions on it. yet in the same breadth you will make the claim is just the opposite. This is called hypocrisy. --- On the same token. I fear i care more about the rights of women and minorities than you do. It's very sad how gullible people are these days.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
I was very careful to say the church should...rather than the church must. I support the church staying in the stone ages. More and more people can grow out of religion that much easier if it's constantly trying to oppress us. Then we will know who the true winners are.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 Indeed people are walking away from churches in droves. It's called the falling away, and it was prophecised of 1900 years ago, as was the re-enstatement of the state of israel, and the nations gathering against her.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
Uh huh, excuses. I've seen how church prophecy is played out. If you wait thousands enough years, stuff in the bible might come true. That kind of thinking I left behind a long time ago. I think if churches want to keep getting donations, they should be more welcoming. That's my point.
libgirl420 7 months ago
@libgirl420 It's time for you to make a decision. Stand on a side. The side of reason. Or the side of propaganda and dictatorship. You choose. I've made my choice.
SupremeAmerican 7 months ago
@SupremeAmerican
I've made my position quite clear. I never needed to make a decision, I've been arguing for the same thing the whole time.
libgirl420 7 months ago
She really is pathetic, I don' t know why she even bothered.
unbridledid 8 months ago
Dennis is the man.
nickj116 8 months ago
Stephanie Miller vs. Dennis Prager is equivalent to Woody Allen vs. Mike Tyson.
jradamo 9 months ago
She should be very grateful that the time ran out before Prager could respond to her simplistic comments about the Old Testament. He is an expert in Jewish theology. SMH.
kevinwbrowning 10 months ago
Dennis Prager is a great man. It's just a simple fact of life.
ebeatworld 10 months ago
Prager tried to have an intelligent debate and she just threw out stupid quips the whole time. Poor Dennis.
MRPITHER 1 year ago
Thoughtful, polite, and honest debate points vs moronic spouting of talking points, pandering comments, and insults.
EchoMike03 1 year ago
@EchoMike03 Pretty typical discourse when it comes to left vs. right.If your argument is thin go for laughs, insults and ridicule.
Pomiferous 11 months ago
I love that one of the first questions was "Why are Republicans so mean spirited?" and then the Leftist continues the debate by inuslting both McCain and Palin, if you disagree with her you are obviously a homophobe. Mr Prager used ONE negative adjective and that was that word" stupid". So who is actually being mean spirited?
EchoMike03 1 year ago
"Grampy McSame"
I wish liberals would listen to themselves a few years ago and then look at the ASTOUNDING differences between Bush and Obama.
Not that much change huh? Well that's what you get when you have two people (regardless of party) enacting the same ideology.
DosuZakuKin 1 year ago
Miller is a dingbat. She's not even debating.
coolandtall 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
she made a total fool of herself
roudy1689 1 year ago
PWND!!
yits051 1 year ago
All Hail The State Of Israel!Dennis Prager Has Spoken!!
gary7999 1 year ago
This woman is an absolute embarrassment! She thinks she's at the def comedy jam, while Prager is trying to debate.
morty007 1 year ago
@morty007 Prager woulnt know how to debate if his mother wasbreast feeding him.
gary7999 1 year ago
@gary7999
morty007 1 year ago
@gary7999
One of the benefits of being on the left is that you don't have to be intellectual .
morty007 1 year ago
@morty007 One of the benefits of following politics is you can blame someone else like terrorists for you ignorant bullshit.
gary7999 1 year ago
i'm convinced that miller showed up to give one liners. she is not too interested in the debate.
coolandtall 1 year ago
This is the video that helped me clarify to myself what my beliefs are, and why I cannot identify with the side that Stephanie Miller supports.
lwst82 1 year ago
Does she have any response to Dennis except saying something that's NON SEQUITUR. She stepped right into the homophobia comment.
coolandtall 1 year ago
Miller is cute but obviously doesn't have too much going on upstairs. She clearly didn't stand a chance against Prager. I love her comment about how capable Obama would be on the economy. Stephanie, would you like to retract that statement?
howser12 1 year ago
Hey Miller, Obama 's been in office almost two years now and the economy still sucks.
coolandtall 1 year ago
This is really no contest. Stephanie Miller's show consist of name calling and potty humor. Dennis Prager's show consists of Philosophical discussions and serious topics. Why on earth would anyone think that Miller stood a chance against the intellectual superiority of Prager.
sinkablehail 1 year ago
I love Prager's expression while she's ranting. It says "Oh my, I thought I was going to be debating an adult tonight."
HardforJesus 1 year ago
Stephanie Miller is a good liberal debater. Calling names, making ad hominem fallacies, insulting the other side, and engaging in Ageism. She gets an A+ in the liberal playbook, doesn't she?
TheWinepusher 1 year ago
@TheWinepusher you got that right!!
roudy1689 1 year ago
Prager is just another hooray for Israel, the hell with America, treasonous right wing Jew
Uncle99B 1 year ago
Comment removed
everton777 1 year ago
This is a non-contest. This woman's constant appeal to emotion and the issuing of name calling and vulgarities characterizes the left perfectly. She is a mental midget compared to Mr. Prager.
everton777 1 year ago
This woman is just vulgar. Dennis Prager is conducting himself with such class, I feel like I should lose some respect for him (just a smidgen) for consenting to partake in this farce in the first place. The reason I have not lost any respect for Ms. Miller is because I never had any for her in the first place.
TavaresDelanis 1 year ago
She's a sad case obamadrone!
Syrianassasin 1 year ago
I was always puzzled as to how Stephanie Miller achieved any sort of success in anything. She's like Ryan Seacrest....what is her skill exactly? I think they both have the world's greatest agent. Maybe it's the same agent?
voodooshizzle 1 year ago
Funny cause last time I checked Obama CAN'T do a thing
mossadabk 1 year ago
Dennis is a master debater and so intellectual as well as polite. Miller acts like a complete fool. I can't even respect what she says because of her demeanor. What a complete idiot she is. Not to mention she has no idea what she is saying.
IronfistAmerican 1 year ago 2
I happen to be a gunsmith. Do you know how many patents exist for guns that routinely blow up? There is an endless list of patents for gun which are a greater danger to the shooter than to anyone else.
m181906 1 year ago
Prager for President!
nickj116 1 year ago
33:43 is just pure win.
longlivecrow 1 year ago
It's amazing how childish the remarks are from the left. Prager didn't even attack her or belittle her, and he still won the debate. Most of her debate was filled with insults and name calling.
It was like watching a grown up debating a 10 year old.
rtekbillabong 1 year ago 9
Stephanie Miller should be pushing a broom somewhere, rather than commenting on current events.
Wilburnator 1 year ago 5
So now we see who runs from truth like a vampire from garlic don't we 'darwinkilledgod'.
You've shown how much you know about "evolutionary biology", why not join the faux news comedy team like prager and give us all a laugh, keep showing us your business acumen.
Getsen42 1 year ago
Take a look at the Christopher Hitchens vs Dennis Prager debate in the related videos to the right of your screen, to see just how easily Prager (and any other conservative) falls apart when faced with facts.
Like garlic to a vampire.
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 Prager's beliefs about religion easily fall apart when basic scientific questions are asked. The same cannot be said for his arguments for nuclear power, against left wing appeasement of dictators, for the war in Iraq (see Hitchens on that again), and for enhanced interrogation techniques.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
This woman is in way over her head.
mick03112 1 year ago
Stephanie looked absolutely childish, the fact she's even on the same stage as prager blows my mind, he can't even respond to someone that simplistic.
nonracistguy 1 year ago 3
Each year just one French nuclear power plant produces 15,000 tons of depleted uranium. This is then shipped to Russia where it is stored in contaminated, unsafe areas around Siberia.
Eventually, many will die as the leaks occur. Most nuclear waste has a couple thousand years of activity. It is simple to keep an eye on a dangerous storage of anything here on earth for thousands of years isn't it.
Dennis Preggo is a liar and a shill for idiocy (reich-wingers).
Getsen42 1 year ago
Thank you Getsen42 for supporting his point about left wingers being more abnoxious and calling people names. Also your claim that people will die is vague and unsupported by the evidence.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod,
That's like saying that a prediction of sunny skies tomorrow is vague and unsupported because the temperature isn't specified.
Let me break it down so you can understand.
Nuclear Waste = Bad
Exposure to Nuclear Waste = Badder
Duh.....
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 The beginning of intelligence is recognizing tradeoffs. Yes, nuclear waste is bad. But on the other hand, energy is good! So at this point, if your mind hasn't exploded, you must realize that some tradeoff exists between them. The question remains, how much danger are we willing to tolerate for how much energy? Nuclear waste is, considering alternatives, extremely safe!
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod ,
The beginning of intelligence is recognizing the need to stay on the topic of discussion which is not intelligence, nor its beginning but rather nuclear waste/energy pros vs cons.
A 20 hp sterling engine powered by a 2'x4' fresnel lens for each home can if properly administered, take each and every household off the grid for 5grand.
Why won't this happen for 50 years?
Because there is 50 years of oil left for the robber barons to make $ with.
There isn't enough nuke raw mat.
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 I was on topic, if you can't see that...well then, you can't see that.
Your conspiracy theory beliefs about fresnel lens are unbelievable: 1) make one for me and I'll buy it for $5000. This isn't a meaningless talking point. I will literally pay you $5000 if you can make a product that powers my brother's house for years on end.
2) Why doesn't one of the greedy oil companies make this device, patent it, and sell it for a huge mark up to environmentalists?
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod ,
Pay me first and I'll make it for you.
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 I don't believe you, why would I give you a cent? In the real world (contrasted with the conspiracy theory ego-scratching back allies of the internet) you take a risk when you try to create a new product, betting it will work and be cost effective. You would have me believe that every person capable of making this invention is too lazy to make millions of dollars on it.
You're wrong, please adjust your beliefs.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
Beam me up Scotty....
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 Do you have an argument or should I take that as you acknowledging that you were wrong? Do you believe greedy corporations could make tons of money on your invent but choose not to? Do you believe oil companies are so powerful that they control literally every other corporation on the planet so that none of them are able to buy your idea and make money? What exactly is your point?
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod,
Now the final insult....to be questioned about my "point" by an idiot who doesn't even know about 18th century technology and in typical arrogant amurikkkan style, can't read or comprehend or realize that I have a fresnel, a stirling engine, a hydrogen electrolyzer and a ford pickup that runs on biodiesel....
Yes, you typical youtube commenter, i have a point.
Yes, the technology is real.
Yes, you too can go run your home off the grid.
Duhhh
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 I have a PhD in evolutionary biology and have published in two of the world's leading scientific journals. Calling me an "idiot" just doesn't do anything to me, sorry.
And so if I can derive your point (because you again haven't stated it) it is that the evil oil companies are suppressing technology that already exists and is regularly used by a number of people around the world... Huh? Seriously...your point is what?
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod ,
Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life here....
You are published? Me too...
Here's a taste.
Isaiah J. Fidler, Jerry Y. Tsao, Steve Davis, Akihiko Nii, and Eugenie S. Kleinerman. Activated Human Blood Monocytes Trigger The Antitumor Activity of Blood Polymorphonuclear Cells. Lymphokine Research 1989. Volume 8. Issue No. 4. Pages 427-437.
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 I'm still waiting to hear your point... You waste a lot of your space with boring repetitious jokes and intellectually bankrupt jokes. What is your point? How do the oil companies keep this beautiful and profitable technology off the market? Why aren't there greedy capitalists making monkey off it?
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@malthuskilleddarwin, the only waste for me is communicating with someone like you. Call Mark Kress and ask him if there is an anti-MENSA society you can join....
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 Another personal attack and humorless joke... still awaiting your point. I hope those reading the comments can see how easy it is to expose libral nonsense: make the slightest inquiry into their reasoning and all they have is name-calling and feeble attempts at humor. What took place between Getsen42 and I was very much like the video.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod , Yes, please youtube viewers, note how this idiot has to have a point repeated so he can tell his friends what he reads from my pen and then claim it is his knowledge. Why not just put a big sign behind you, "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" as you live in your conservative delusion?
But...here ya go simpleton - per capita in the U.S., citizens use on average 17,147 lb of oil equivalent per year. At 42 gallons per barrel, and 5.78 million btu/barrel, and 1700 kWh/barrel (continued)
Getsen42 1 year ago
it is easy to see that an average U.S. home consumes 1356 kWh/month which is roughly 45.2 kWh/day. Now, a 16 horsepower generator produces a continuous peak/rated output of 8.75 kW so then if we run it for 6 hours, we cover the use for each home, no? Six hours is about the amount of sunlight available excluding night and cloud cover so as I said up-thread, a 20 hp Stirling engine powered by a 2' x 4' fresnel lens would take all homes off the grid.
Duhhhh......how's that twitt-er?
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 Thanks for finally making a point. Now, could you explain again why you're not a billionnaire for selling this cheap and effective energy generating system to everyone in the US? Is it that corporations are just not greedy enough to sell a superior product?
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@Getsen42 (part 2) Option a) your calculations miss important costs and thus the free market hasn't selected your alternative, or b) there are billions of dollars to be made but no one (including you) bothers to make them. Am I missing a third alternative?
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod , just like a simpleton conservative to think in black and white.
ONLY two alternatives in your little peanut.
How very typical.
Go ahead, do your own research, realize that I'm correct and go tell everyone it was your idea just like all conservatives do in the business environment.
Getsen42 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod ..
ps. THERE IS NO FREE MARKET. Just the rich and the poor and here's a stat that I'd like you to poke a hole in while you are chatting in front of all the youtube viewers.....the scholar Kotlikoff, in 1988 concluded that 65-80% of U.S. wealth is inherited....how's that for popping your U.S. freemarket bubble on where people get their money? See the book, Inheritance of Wealth by Jens Beckert.
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 More insults, more jokes, more threats...no answer as usual. What was that about conservatives being hateful? You still haven't answered the simple question of why greedy businessmen haven't made money on your idea.
By the way, free market and inheritance of wealth are not opposites! If you earn money and don't spend it...who should get it?
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod, frame this all day long as if I have to answer your silly questions again and again. I answered your questions and gave you real energy solutions for not using nuke power. You act like the answers below don't exist. Now you'll answer my questions.
How can "greedy businessmen" make money on my idea, when I haven't told them about it, I've only told an "evolutionary biologist"?
Why do you ask such a silly question if you have a PhD?
Why do you say "opposites", I didn't?
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 You claim you know how to provide cheaper more efficient energy; assuming people in the energy business also have this idea, then there's a reason they aren't acting on it. You haven't said why. Perhaps you believe they just haven't thought of it, in which case tell them! More likely, you don't know what you're talking about.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod you idiot. Give me a valid email address and I'll show you some i.p. that your small mind could barely comprehend. It has a provisional patent and was sold for $100k. Guess who the inventor of a green method of producing Hydrazine for reprocessing control rods and for use in hypergolic drive systems as rocket fuel is? Not you, you dimwit, ME. That's right, shit for brains, when you say I don't know what I'm talking about, you only show more idiocy....what's your email?
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 More insults... Patents don't mean the product works effectively. Take your yummy patent and go sell it to a greedy bank or oil company that believes it's efficient. They'll pay you lots of money (which you'll deserve) and make this wonderful product for all of us. Why waste your time on youtube?
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod, what's your email address?
Or don't you answer simple questions?
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 I don't ask silly questions, I ask plain direct questions...like a scientist. The fact that you don't have answers - only jokes and insults - does not mean the questions are silly. You've added a third alternative: a) you're wrong, b) businessmen don't want to make money, and now c) no one knows about your genius world changing idea.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@Getsen42 RE: inheritance. Not that it's relevant, but the average estate tax in the US is 30% which means it is mathematically impossible for 80% of the US wealth to be inherited. It also implies that wealthy people spend less than 20% of what they earn, which is obviously nonsense, and if not, who cares if people inherit money they're not spending it.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod , you see if one is published, one uses "references" like I did below (Kotlikoff, Jens Beckert), etc.
You simply say that your opinion "implies that something is..."
Wow, now that would be a really good cited reference for a peer review, no?
Getsen42 1 year ago
@Getsen42 In point in fact, you didn't provide a reference, you just dropped a name. A reference is to a journal article not a person...but whatever. I don't care about the inheritance issue.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
My future wife.
JerGran 2 years ago
Your the greatest Stephanie.
blueBlackpurple 2 years ago
also she is soooo perverted
raytuenge1 2 years ago
Is she calling McCain grampy? That is so lame. Thats like calling Obama niggy.
raytuenge1 2 years ago 2
She Destroyed Prager......calling some one Gampy cause their old is not th same as calling someone nigger......obviously u've never been called that,
deceptikan 2 years ago
I happen to think calling a veteran war prisoner who has served his country for decades "Grampy" is as insulting as calling a black person "Niggy" but perhaps I'm wrong.
She did not destroy Prager, she made mindless comments like, "Democrats are right about everything", "Republicans are hateful...and racist", "Obama beat up McCain in the debate". It was very dull.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod Ok then heres your test, Go up to an old black man and call him Grampy and see what happens then call him a Niggy or whatever dumbshyt racist name you are Brave enough to still use and see if he doesn't get up and smack the plaque off your teeth. LOL
deceptikan 1 year ago
@deceptikan You win.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
@darwinkilledgod The right wing has been bashing Mccain for a LONG TIME. In fact, they viewed his age as a major contributing factor in his loss to Obama. BTW, don't play the veteran card. The right wing presents itself as being concerned for the well being of our troops, AS LONG AS THEY ARE REPUBLICAN. Ask Kerry how the right wing treats our boys.
seekisforme5 1 year ago
It's worse than that, it's Grampy McSane or something like that. She makes his point repeatedly by resorting to mindless cheerleading and petty half-humorous insults.
darwinkilledgod 1 year ago
Goodness........Dennis Prager made her look like an airhead.....
eddiehaskell7 2 years ago 25
@eddiehaskell7 Because she would be cancelled if she didnt let him win.
gary7999 1 year ago
I am still waiting for Miller to make a meaningful statement with at least some degree of merit or validity. Her efforts to hide her intellectual incompetence with petty humor are sadly in vain.
fearsveil 2 years ago 9
I didn't recognize Stephanie without the wacky sound effects. But then in her first sentence she belittled John McCain for being old, and then I recognized her immediately. Though, I admit she is gorgeous on the outside.
seans10 2 years ago
Are we there?
jvandoli 2 years ago
Its amazing to hear her talk about the shredding of the Constitution(in 2008) after what Obama is now doing.
strykersux 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How about how the Bush Administration shredded the Constitution. Both those war criminlas Bush and Cheney made a mockery of the Constitution and every apect of our government.
plummer90715 2 years ago
I wonder if she recognizes that she lost this debate?
strykersux 2 years ago 4
This woman is just not serious... What's the point of this?
strykersux 2 years ago 4
to get people into a mess the GOP will use simple catch phrases like "Kill terrorists" "Gov't is communism" but that's to get you to do stuff...once people find out it's all a lie and the picture is not so simple, the GOP will come out with large long drawn out arguments trying to cover its asses, but it won't work. Liberals have always stuck to the same message, which is easy to understand because the problem is so obvious it should have been avoided if people just used some common sense
dalecampbl5 2 years ago
Prager is so intellectual honest. Miller has no clue how to debate. All she can do is make wise cracks and sling insults. Prager is a deep thinker and very intellectual. Miller is shallow and out of her league in debating Prager.
amileaboveyou 2 years ago 31
@amileaboveyou ive called prager a few times and i can give you examples on how he doesnt know how to debate
DjBobbyLosAngeles 1 year ago
Where are those economists now,that believe Obama had the best grasp on the economy? Obama is a communist ,did they not know that then?And the church that B.O.went to,did white people know that you didn't even have to be a Christian to join?Many practicing Muslims belonged to that church.The only thing that you had to believe to join,was you had to look at the white man as the enemy and agree that he must be destroyed,just like their doctrine proclaims.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
Pragers show is on the same time as Rush, and I have to say that Prager may have less ratings but his show is way more deeper and thoughtful.
Toddthedidger 2 years ago 4
prager is a zionist.
MrTabby5000 2 years ago
and you're a leftist.
Ipetratz 2 years ago
thats not the issue,hes a zionist jew.
MrTabby5000 2 years ago
MrTabby500, you state that he is a zionist jew as if it reveals some self-evident truth that means something. What is your point?
If I said you were from Ohio should we all nod our heads knowingly and draw meaningful conclusions about your character or veracity based on such a statement?
Your remark echoes that of very ignorant people and I'm not sure you are one of those.
nomorepushingusdown 2 years ago
He supports the crimes of Israel against the Palestinians.Israels mythical holy land is that MYTHICAL,the bible is mythology and god as christians believe in him doesnt exist.
MrTabby5000 2 years ago
MrTabby5000, most of the zionists who worked for and obtained League of Nations authorization to establish the State of Israel were, in fact, not religious and some would agree with you that G-d is mythical. Even if someone claims that the region was promised to them by G-d, that is not how Israel was created. It was created entirely by a secular body, the League of Nations, which was putting into action the contents of the Balfour Declaration set forth by Great Britain, another secular body.
nomorepushingusdown 2 years ago
Christopher HItchens and Dennis Prager agree on most issues. They're both conservative. Their only disagreement is religion. So I don't believe anyone should be debating which one is more intellectual. They're both eloquent speakers and intelligent.
raytuenge1 2 years ago
Are you sure Hitchens is conservative?? So he's against abortion and stuff?
bbeaup 2 years ago
@raytuenge1 Hitchens supports Israel?Explains alot.
gary7999 1 year ago
@gary7999 Hitchens supports a two state solution.
devourage 1 year ago