Noun: Church music sung as a single vocal line in free rhythm and a restricted scale (plainsong), in a style developed for the medieval Latin liturgy
it is true that Guillaume de Machaut composed many Gregorian chants, however this piece in particular is not one. This is actually one of the first polyphonic pieces to become a "mass ordinary" in the church. It's four-voice parts clearly disqualifies Notre Dame Mass as a monophonic Gregorian chant.
This is not a gregorian chant, it's the agnus dei from notre dame mass, which is a polyphonical set based on an agnus dei melody (that is found in tenor part, with its rhythm extended by the very-known compositional device called "talea".)
you little bitches shut the fuck up and enjoy the music, if i had it wrong it would be corrected it is as it is written notre dame mass chrior this is off a concert i own so fuck off you first year music know it alls. peace
@matthewteague I like the music, but it is true that Chrior is not a word. Look it up in any dictionary and you will find it missing where as other music terms are present. Don't try to use your music education as an excuse for bad English.
Gregorian Chant is monophonic, sacred texts. Baroque is after the Renaissance, which is after Medieval period. Guillaume De Machaut (c. 1300-1377, before Renaissance) compositions are polyphonic, and mostly in French, not Latin... just music style between Medieval and Renaissance.
Maybe you should look it up yourself next time, smart guy.
Your posting title reminds me of the story of Sir Edmund Hilary the first man to climb Everest. When asked why he climed Everest, he said, "Because it is there," Many years before that he was found as a child to be playing with himself in the bathroom by his mother. She asked, "Why are you playing with that?" His response was: "Because it is there."
what you've just said is even more wrong than what you had in the description. I'm not going to correct you or dwell on it however, just do some research if you're going teach people about this stuff. I don't mean to insult you.
i live with a piano major in 4th year,i myself am a third year classical guitar major, between the two of us we have completed 3 years of music history, if im still wrong prove it by telling me the composer other than machaut,and if it isnt him then why is this a Gregorian piece i got from a professor of mine,to study the machuat idea of syncopation?
I felt like giving a very stupid response to this, but no, I'll just be clear and fast, to try to make it less shamefull for you...
Machaut is from MEDIEVAL period, he was a composer, but also a poet, he has nothing to do with gregorian chants, but to ars nova, go to wikipedia please, I wonder how Machaut would feel in his tomb to read such a brutality that you wrote.
@matthewteague Machaut wrote many works based on plainchant, but he himself never wrote any Gregorian Chants. This is definitely him, but it's not gregorian or baroque.
gre·go·ri·an chant
Noun: Church music sung as a single vocal line in free rhythm and a restricted scale (plainsong), in a style developed for the medieval Latin liturgy
it is true that Guillaume de Machaut composed many Gregorian chants, however this piece in particular is not one. This is actually one of the first polyphonic pieces to become a "mass ordinary" in the church. It's four-voice parts clearly disqualifies Notre Dame Mass as a monophonic Gregorian chant.
XXXXXXin 4 months ago
This is not a gregorian chant
morrisdelarosa 4 months ago
This is not a gregorian chant, it's the agnus dei from notre dame mass, which is a polyphonical set based on an agnus dei melody (that is found in tenor part, with its rhythm extended by the very-known compositional device called "talea".)
rafael1207 6 months ago
you little bitches shut the fuck up and enjoy the music, if i had it wrong it would be corrected it is as it is written notre dame mass chrior this is off a concert i own so fuck off you first year music know it alls. peace
matthewteague 1 year ago 2
@matthewteague I like the music, but it is true that Chrior is not a word. Look it up in any dictionary and you will find it missing where as other music terms are present. Don't try to use your music education as an excuse for bad English.
ConquerorZeil 8 months ago
Gregorian Chant is monophonic, sacred texts. Baroque is after the Renaissance, which is after Medieval period. Guillaume De Machaut (c. 1300-1377, before Renaissance) compositions are polyphonic, and mostly in French, not Latin... just music style between Medieval and Renaissance.
Maybe you should look it up yourself next time, smart guy.
jakeubusz 1 year ago
Your posting title reminds me of the story of Sir Edmund Hilary the first man to climb Everest. When asked why he climed Everest, he said, "Because it is there," Many years before that he was found as a child to be playing with himself in the bathroom by his mother. She asked, "Why are you playing with that?" His response was: "Because it is there."
LazlosPlane 2 years ago
a truly magnificent piece of art.... the polyphonic texture accompanies the syncopation into a gorgeous crescendo of beauty. thanks for posting.
shmumush 2 years ago
thats what i said when my professor showed me the sheet music just for the t2 b1 lines,i just love Gregorian music.
matthewteague 2 years ago
Machaut and Gregorian chant are two different things
bush0165 2 years ago
machaut is a baroque period composer ,who did write many classic gregorian chants.
matthewteague 2 years ago
what you've just said is even more wrong than what you had in the description. I'm not going to correct you or dwell on it however, just do some research if you're going teach people about this stuff. I don't mean to insult you.
bush0165 2 years ago
i live with a piano major in 4th year,i myself am a third year classical guitar major, between the two of us we have completed 3 years of music history, if im still wrong prove it by telling me the composer other than machaut,and if it isnt him then why is this a Gregorian piece i got from a professor of mine,to study the machuat idea of syncopation?
matthewteague 2 years ago
I felt like giving a very stupid response to this, but no, I'll just be clear and fast, to try to make it less shamefull for you...
Machaut is from MEDIEVAL period, he was a composer, but also a poet, he has nothing to do with gregorian chants, but to ars nova, go to wikipedia please, I wonder how Machaut would feel in his tomb to read such a brutality that you wrote.
starbreez3 2 years ago 2
@matthewteague Machaut wrote many works based on plainchant, but he himself never wrote any Gregorian Chants. This is definitely him, but it's not gregorian or baroque.
magnolia9042 1 year ago
@magnolia9042 terminology miscommunication trust me.
matthewteague 1 year ago
Comment removed
AlainMarcus 2 years ago
@matthewteague I like medieval pop music, what about you?
starbreez3 1 year ago
Machaut's Notre Dame Mass is one of my favorites. Who's singing.
22349a 3 years ago
as far as i know it is a mass choir from England that works with the London philharmonic orchestra so long story short im not too sure.
matthewteague 2 years ago
I really like Guillaume de Machaut, his music has really influenced the music of today. Great vid btw!!^^ Nice rocks!!
demonbleach13 3 years ago
danke! so nice to see a sane person still on the planet.
matthewteague 3 years ago
you machaut....rocks!
matthewteague 3 years ago
awesome
canuckslou0101 3 years ago
kool...i like the gregorian chant...
Princessjasmineariel 3 years ago
it is de bestest
matthewteague 3 years ago
FIRST COMMENT!
TexansCreed 3 years ago
you just one a million notdollors! thanks
matthewteague 3 years ago
anything at all..
matthewteague 4 years ago
post anything
matthewteague 4 years ago