Added: 4 years ago
From: momo2007x
Views: 13,588
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • My God did anyone else see him go transparent running around the set like that ?

    I wonder if the aliens that are mining the moon zapped him with their transperadiation gun ...

  • What is the biggest lie ever told by the U.S. ... Man on the moon or September 11 th?

  • @sikorskifly lolocaust

  • Fantastic! What was program or series is this?

  • Moon hoax proponents are like the jerks who complain about Christmas decorations. When your life is so pathetic that you have to try and shit on other people's joy and accomplishments, you are fucked in the head and should get help.

  • @Synthetrix

    You are wasting your time trying to get through to them. Most are completely dumwitted and know nothing about the manned space programs (except errrrr ...... derrrrrrr ... blah ... blah ... waving flag ... derrr ... wires etc etc etc)

    I really cannot be arsed to argue with them anymore, most are just low intelligence monkeys who cannot put up any kind of arguement except childish name calling.

  • If you losers dont' believe it, quit watching and bitching about it. Get a life, lurking on the internet being cybertough isn't gainful employment. Take a break from the filing of welfare checks, actually go at least look for a job, and become a useful part of society instead of foul mouth, cynical, anti-American losers. And please, show some actual intelligence & grammar ability and dispense with the text language bs.

  • You gotta love the losers. You know the ones. Thats them who have no faith in the ability of the human race.

  • who the fuk is holding the camera so still

  • @ChelseaFcTheChmps It's on a tripod, peckerhead.

  • @pac401 dude its fake u fkn american just like ur 9/11 and then u blame an innocent poor country that is full of starvation and attack it. yeh PURE AMErican. u faked this shit so stfu it was impossible at that time to get past the Van Allen Radiation

  • @ChelseaFcTheChmps YOu need to stop watching Star Wars movies and quit wacking off to internet porn and get a life.

  • @pac401 oh and im not into starship shit like that and i have a life and i dont have to wach porn like u loser. this is fake just like 9/11.(im not saying ppl didnt die R.I.P for them, but bush planned it)

  • They shouted their mouths off and when they realised they could not do it they faked it...end of story.

  • @jenleex YEP. THE END

  • @jenleex

    And the russians watched it being faked and went along with it right genius?

  • @TheJomogogo dude its fkn obvious america pulled one of the biggest pranks in the history. stop wishing its true because its fkn IMPOSSIBLE TO GET PAST VAn Allen radiation

  • @ChelseaFcTheChmps

    Impossible to get past the Van Allen Belts ? Why? Because some other hoaxtard told you so? No one has ever said they were too intense to go through, only haoxtards with grade school educations make that claim.

  • @TheJomogogo dude ppl who finish school know that there was no fkn wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy nooooooooooooo wayyyyyyyyy to get past it and its not a hoax its real look it up Mofo. u fkn believe everything u see. its unbelievable. u would believe that if america "went" to neptune right this minute and landed a man on it you would say yeh its real. ITS not coz he would be fkn dead from the gas and the cold. Learn some Facts dickhead

  • @ChelseaFcTheChmps

    No. People who finish school know that the van Allen Belt is no big deal. Fools like you think otherwise.

    Just google it for yourself. Van Allen himself said it was no big deal.

  • @TheJomogogo dude now your just bullshiting stop dreaming and get on with your life. this was fkn fake. thats why the best actors are in america

  • @ChelseaFcTheChmps I know your comment is a few weeks old now, and I don't mean to raise emotions, but please consider this. The Van Allen Belt are regions of high-energy particles that is 200 miles to 20000 miles from the surface, we frequently go there to put satellites in orbit. If it is impossible to go through... How do the satellites get there. I'm not debating the moon landing I am simply trying to correct a miss understanding that's all.

  • @ChelseaFcTheChmps exactly 'dickhead', learn some facts and quit talking out your ass. Neuter/spay yourself as to not to continue to pollute the planet, please.

  • @M44UAK4Me

    It is not his fault .... he is a Chelsea supporter. You should make allowences for the poor chap.

  • It's much easier to get there now, a sustained lunar effort could be mounted from an Earth orbitting space station (ISS) Have to get the Russians on board, they can launch supplies much cheaper, it doesn't take much energy to get from earth orbit to the moon. If there is water(ice) on the polar regions then permenent settlement becomes possible, the countries (allience?) that gets there 1st wins.

  • Comment removed

  • and even though they do not put men into the moon they acomplish, various important tasks in space, during the space race, repeat the Chinese even though, have an important space program, can not get to the moon until i say 2030, or far away, you are over reacting. say it again you are over reacting. all that they have is an eva 2years ago.

  • This is a lie the Chinese, don't have the capacity needed to get to the moon i think that you are over reacting, Chinese don't have even the capacity that the Soviet had in the 60's, do not forget that the Soviets, land probes in venus, in fact the only ones landed, in that infernal conditions

    50 bar of pressure almost 400ºC of temperature, (makes me wonder why they don't land probes in mars, far better than mars 3) .

  • NASA's money was only 5% of the budget in the 1960s. Far more money was spent on the Vietnam war than on Apollo!!! Shows where our priorities as a Culture lie.

  • Sadly, the committee for human space flight determined last week that there is not enough congressional support and funding to get us back to e moon by 2020. There are just too many other pressing issues here on earth for the U.S. to devote the tremendous amount of money it takes to put men into deep space.

  • True, it begins: " .... program appears to be on an unsustainable trajectory." Depressing words, my comment being that it has always had budget problems (thats why the Apollo program was cut short in the first place). Going to the moon is extremely expensive, the primary reason we have not been back, despite an ABSURD idea conspirisory theorists maintain that we don't have the technology. Its simply all about money, & the economy for the next two decades is not set. Fingers crossed!!

  • Private Industry will get us into space. The Chinese will do it. NASA's budget is only 1% of the national GDP and budget, and instead we spend $10-billion a month on the Iraq war alone. If the money spent on war was diverted instead to help private-industry get into space, this would be moot. With my boss professor John Searl's IGV flight drives and machines which were first built in 1946, the cost of spacework can come down by vast sums. NASA knows of Searl's work, as Dr. Artur Cain, of NASA.

  • The Constellation program is the next one to go to the Moon (building of the Lunar Outpost) and possibly to Mars - exciting stuff! Still in the early testing and development phases but lots of data available on line. Sci-Fi may take a backseat to Sci-Fact in the near future. These are amazing times!

  • Fake? OK genius, where did the rocket go?

  • and why would they spend so much time, money and effort in training the spacemen just to fake it

  • Does any really own the moon or if chinese get to the moon would it be split up in countries or something like our planet

  • Comment removed

  • Actually the plaque says:

    "Here men from the planet earth first set foot upon the moon July 1969. We came in peace for all mankind."

    That kinda sounds like the moon is for everyone..

    Also the flag is there to show that Americans got there first, not that they own it.

  • Is a shame that we have to wait till 2020, to see the moon again, I hope that Nasa work as hard as posible to send men's into the moon, I can not wait to see a Man step over Mars, is a shame that the whole fleet of shutle, is retired, there is no workhorse like that, on the other hand this is something which has a meaning to me to see that footage, I was born a month after it happen, august fifteen, of 1969, I hope that Nasa work as hard as possibly can.

    Gaddy Alcalá

  • We might see Chinese or Indians on the moon before the Americans go back! They're certainly making great strides in their own space programs. It's my hope that the nations begin to share assets and technoogy in space, like (and better than) the group of nations funding the ISS.

  • The shuttle just hasn't worked out: too complicated, too fragile. The Saturn rocket that sent men to the moon was 100% reliable, never had a misfire. The plan now is to go back to something similar.

  • Uhh... Apollo 1? Apollo 13? I wouldn't say never had a misfire.

  • I have studied quite a bit the Mercury program and the Gemini Program leading to the Apollo Program and i have loads of data. It would be my greatest pleasure to share it with you. It is an amazing feat and just so inspiring, im sure you'd find things that would change your mind. May i suggest you read "In The Shadow of The Moon", or watch the documentary by the same name.

    All the best for you and your explorations!

    ric

  • For starters, moon's gravity produces the tides in all the earth's oceans, 4 times every 24h roughly. That affects all curents and just about three quarters of the weather systems on our atmosphere. The list goes on and on, but i trust you might want to look for a more reliable source... may i add that the gravity on the moon is aproximatly 1.6 meters per squared second, or aprox 17% of earths gravity, quite enough to keep you from floating into space.

  • Dear 1987lambofgod, i respect your curiosity and keen skepticism, these are certanly great qualities if one is looking for something. However, i must advise you to gather more information before jumping, or rather "leaping" to conclusions. Allow me to inform you that the Earth's moon does produce gravity. In fact, if it did not, there would be catastrophic consequences to our planet. (2bcont)

  • Noway. No fake. Just 1969 'high-tech' pictures. I guess you're spoiled with todays camerashots and everything possible. How to shut up all thousand technicians involved in the Apollo project? Stupid hoaxhunters, go find yourselves a real life.

  • fake....look at his coat hanger sagging down because of gravity then he pulls it to hide that fact, then the "freefloating camera" is rotating left then oddly rotates right for a second then back left? how with nothing to stop it and turn it? also the camera would stay fairly still.. i mean there is no gravity to change its balance or move it..

  • all objects have a gravitational force, its basic physics you stupid faggot peice of shit.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more