Actually @aronra these lunatics make many predictions. The first one that leaps to mind is Ken Ham with his "what would we expect to find if there was a global flood?" spiel, with his answer being "billions of dead things in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth." Similarly, Carl Baugh in his brilliantly stupid programme "creation in the 21st century" (a must watch) references the grand canyon, of all things, as something that matches the expected consequences of a global flood.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Energy transformed is the only theory that corrects the "secular" theology that proves that secularism is a flaw in the process. However Secular wants to protect the dinosaurs and standard train evolution....I accept....The earth was NOT created in 7 (24 hour) days. We can only surmise how many millennium transpired before genetic insertion was performed. However...You soul is real even under scientific theory. And you fools will find that you exist after the body expels your energy
@Crucible0Patriot "You soul is real even under scientific theory. And you fools will find that you exist after the body expels your energy" How on earth can you know this. Have you died or seen a body "expel energy"? Can you provide an experiment that would prove this? Can you show a paper showing that the body has a soul? If not then these are blind speculations asserted as truth and therefore you are being dishonest in the extreme.
@Crucible0Patriot "However Secular wants to protect the dinosaurs and standard train evolution" No one is "protecting" dinosaurs or evolution, what is being done is the wilful retardation of the population by religious fundies who reject demonstrable reality in favour of a book of fables which cannot be proven to be factual and can be demonstrably shown to be false on multiple accounts.
Your choice of only picking Dinosaurs out of the thousands of fossil fauna is telling of your knowledge.
@Crucible0Patriot Reading your jumbled word salad is amusing. "Secular theology"? You obviously don't know what the word, 'secular' even means. Neither is the soul "real under scientific theory". You obviously don't know what a scientific theory is either. Suffice to say that souls are unsubstantiated assumptions, supposed and asserted without evidence; being magical, supernatural, untestable, unfalsifiable, and therefore NOT 'real' in any way science could recognize.
@AronRa@Crucible0Patriot "Reading your jumbled word salad is amusing. 'Secular theology'? You obviously don't know what the word, 'secular' even means. Neither is the soul 'real under scientific theory'. You obviously don't know what a scientific theory is either. Suffice to say that souls are unsubstantiated assumptions, supposed and asserted without evidence; being magical, supernatural, untestable, unfalsifiable, and therefore NOT 'real' in any way science could recognize."
@Crucible0Patriot "However...You soul is real even under scientific theory" What is this theory called are can you point me to the published, peer-review research papers demonstrating this. I am curious and eager to read them.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Evolution is the only "scientific theory" that needs laws to protect it!"
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked"
Galatians 6:7
"You turn things upside down, as if the potter were thought to be like the clay! Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, "He did not make me"? Can the pot say of the potter, "He knows nothing"?"
"So the man took his concubine and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go." Thus Saith the Lord!
...Look, just because something is in the Bible -- or ANY holy book! -- doesn't mean you should automatically follow it, do it, or respect the idea of it without proper questioning and reason.
@shadowmax889 YouTube it. It's very interesting and I strongly recommend you to approach this case, know the way creationists acted in it and how they were just blatantly PWNED!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Here's my issue : To assume that the supernatural does not exist requires the same amount of assumptive thinking as saying it does exist simly because of the stated fact that it cannot be measured. Therefore equal amounts of faith are involved. Secondly, if nothing transends the material what was the cause of matter which we know is not static or eternal? Perhaps nothing became something? To assume this again puts you in the place of drawing answers from something not measurable = faith.
To assume the supernatural does not exist is merely accepting the null hypothesis, which is required in all areas of science. There must be evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
"what was the cause of matter which we know is not static or eternal?"
We don't know this. In fact, all evidence points to matter/energy always existing.
@SteadyD4Jesus To say that something can neither be measured nor indicated by anything, that there is no way to distinguish such claims from the illusion of delusion, requires no faith of any kind. I can truthfully say that such things aren't evidently real, because that statement would still be verifiably accurate even if supernatural things actually DO exist. Faith on the other hand states as fact things which are not neither implied nor supported by evidence, and is therefore dishonest.
What is funny is that despite all the talk about "supernatural" beings, if lets say goblins would exist they wouldn't be supernatural because their existence could theoretically be proven one way or another.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed in design or useless.
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
WHAT ABOUT THE STARS? Gravity explains how the order found in the precise courses of trillions of stars is maintained, but gravity can't explain the origin of that order! Did all the trillions stars agree to get out of each others way? C'mon! Disorder in the universe is because of chance, but the order is because of design. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article that examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of both transitional forms and lack of sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Say Aron, I just recently got into a long-winded email debate with a user by the name of Truthislife7 and he said that he tried to get into a debate with you but nothing came of it. I'd like to know your take on this issue. Please and thank you.
Why would any religious person even argue against evolution? Just say that everything in Genesis wasn't literal like you do every other time something science presents makes too much sense. "God days" explain everything. Millions of years of evolution happened in one "god day". Just divide the 4.5 Billion, or whatever it is number by 7 and claim 1 God Day=600 Million years. Then you have a ridiculous time system 4 anything. Like 2000 years is so fast God can't see it. It's in the spirit world.
4:15 - 4:44 The cling tightly to their position, never letting go. They will go through any length to defend it, even if it has no evidence supporting it, even if it means violating their cherished moral codes. They will lie and deny, even when confronted with mountains of evidence against their viewpoint. They never see their contradictions and inaccuracies, and don't care even when others point them out to them. That's not truth, that's not reason, that's mental illness.
I see someone is religiously opposed to Google and libraries.
All the facts about evolution stated by AronRa can and have been objectively verified and all "evidence" for creation is the product of distortions, logical fallacies, and baldfaced lies.
In addition, it's rather absurd to accuse this video of all 17 of being "verbose." AronRa keeps this one pretty damn straightforward and it's much easier to follow than the 11th.
There are a healthy number of simple questions asked about "creation science" starting around the four-minute mark, and if you really had anything to contribute, you'd provide an answer to one or more of these questions. Instead, you resort to insults because you have no answers.
Thanks Aronra for using that trial scene in Planet of the Apes @9:54. Probably one of the best 15 minutes in movie history. I couldn't really appreciate the depth of that movie and all of the major topics of religion, science, biology, history, race, and class that the movie touched upon, until I was an adult and had the ability to grasp these subjects.
Only Science will send you back home healthy from the Hospital Bed........ Guess what Religion Creation will certainly bury you in the Earth........ that too pretty soon.
'Evolutionist' science is giving us molecular technology with applications for agricultural, medical and industrial applications. creationist science is giving us nothing.
Put down your fairytale book, tell your invisible friend to go away and get a fucking reality check you pathetic little parasites.
hey, did you make up that calvin and hobbes comic, or did you get it from somewhere else? I know almost for certain that it's not a real calvin and hobbes comic, since I've read nearly all of them. but it actually has the feel and spirit of a calvin and hobbes comic, which I find impressive!
Wow, evolutionists will believe anything. What a bunch of dolts they are. Do yourself a favor and read a few of A. E. Wilder-Smith books and also Robert Dick Wilson's book "A Scientific Investigation of the Old Testament". Do you know that Noah's Ark was discovered? Also, Sodom and Gomorrah, the Red Sea crossing site, the real Mount Sinai the Ark of the Covenant? Yes, the proof is there. All one must do is seek.
@thechessstick i think noahs arc was supposedly discovered about 15 or more times by now. i doubt you can find an old boat or old piece of wood that some creationist whore wont say is or from noahs arc :P
@itsuyo211 You think? Satan has used that old trick many times. Making people disbelieve the real thing because of some phony one. I mean look at how many people are turned away from the real Church because of the Roman Catholic "Church". You know the one where "Fathers" molest little boys. Ron Wyatt did indeed discover Noah's ark.
@thechessstick you think satan planted false ark pieces? whats the point of that? if he can do that why not just completely get rid of the "real" ark? even doing nothing would be better than planting false pieces. if people keep finding fakes theyll prolly keep looking for the real one. if they keep finding nothing eventually they might stop.
@itsuyo211 LOL. Funny. You are undoubtedly an evolutionists, aren't you? You won't even take the time to check out Ron Wyatt's discoveries for yourself. The only investigation your evolutardation will allow you to do is to view a few anti-Ron Wyatt sites. Man you evolutionists are stupid.
@gorilla199uncensored You evolutards are a bunch of parrots. You are so evolutarded that you can't even think on your own. You're just a bunch of government indoctrinated dolts. If you had been taught Islam in your government indoctrination center (read that school) you would be Muslim. Stand up like a man and think for yourself for once.
@thechessstick "If you had been taught Islam in your government indoctrination center...you would be Muslim." You know there are atheists from Muslim countries, its just that their environment is not as tolerant so they often have to remain closeted their whole lives. Some of the most famous are Tariq Ali, Ibn Warraq, and Salman Rushdie. Clasically, one should consult Omar Khayyam, or the "Muslim deist" views of Avicenna. So I'd like to think I'd still be an atheist were I born in a Muslim land.
@bcgonynor You are a government indoctrinated sheep. They teach evolution and and old Earth in Muslim countries, too. That is why there are atheists there. Remember that the god of Islam is also the god of Islam. We know him as Satan.
@thechessstick You know, there were atheists long before evolutionary biology developed, or the age of the Earth was calculated, although an understanding of how the world works does discourage magical explanations. Just curious - to your mind, what is the "government's" goal in brainwashing everyone to be atheists? What could they gain from such a development?
@bcgonynor The simple lie of evolution was something that was started by Satan in the garden when he tempted Eve. "Ye shall be as gods". The age of the Earth was calculated by Jacob Ussher long long ago. He calculated the date of creation to be 4004 B.C. You evolutards are something else. At least the book of Genesis has answers. All you evolutionists have is imagination. Of course you guys will believe about anything.
@thechessstick How does the admonition of a serpent that we might "be as gods" have anything to do with evolutionary theory. Gods are immortal, supernatural, and unchanging. That's antithetical to a system based on natural processes which govern changes made possible by an endless repitition of sex and death. How does that relate? If the Earth were only 4,000 years old, how do you explain thermodynamics? Oh, that's right, by magic! Like a snake talking or people living for 500 years in 2000 BC.
@bcgonynor People did live to be that old. Noah's skeleton was found to be over 12 feet long. God is the Creator. He as God can operate outside the bounds of thermodynamics. That is simply a given. God, by the way, can and will intervene.
@thechessstick Right, magic, like I said. Amusing to be accused of being gullible by someone who would rather believe that the Earth is dependent on constant extraterrestial magical intervention for its basic processes, than give up the most literal possible interpretation of the Babylonian cosmology that was shoehorned into his favorite storybook by some temple scribes who didn't know shit from tits. How could one tell a skeleton was Noah's? You're simply hopeless. Please don't bother replying.
@bogan182 What's the difference? If we're going to ignore the mountain of evidence that the Earth is billions of years old, why not ante up a little bit? That said, I apologize for my clerical error. Of course I was aware that the Earth began on October 23, 4004 BC, at noon on Sunday, as conclusively proven by Lord Ussher. I apologize for my ignorance of the exact details of INSANE BULLSHIT.
@AronRa Sucks that the Hebrew words were written left-to-right instead of right-to-left. It reads Arba-Arbadak instead of Abra-Kadabra. Only when he pointed out the picture I made sense of the text.
The closest I have come to proving god exists to myself is by contemplating how ones DNA is a mini supercomputer capable of holding all the blueprints for a particular organismic. Then also wonder how DNA, which is present in even the simplest single celled organism, started the evolution train. Then add to that the data in the DNA which is like a language of life. Is this language natural? These complex life equations occurring without an author seems as improbable as this proving god exists.
@lowcomedy If one goes so far to admit that there is even the possibility that there is an author there is no reason to go into the complexities of god creating him self. God is a primitive yet still somehow valid explanation for phenomena that humans don't, won't, or can't understand. You might as well ask why witches didn't save themselves from being burned at the stake. I love god, but I wonder if god loves me.
@lowcomedy I said it is still somehow, meaning it is still used as an explanation. Atheism and theism are both full of ones own personal opinion. When I said I wonder if god loves me if is because i wonder if there is a god and I can't wait for science to prove it one way or the other. God is not a valid explanation for anything, yes I know, but what is? Also, the lack of a belief in god is not a valid explanation for anything. Evidence I know, god I think, love I feel.
@yrrebyam666 That's all well and dandy. There could be a god, but nothing we have ever attributed to it has ever furthered our knowledge of anything. we have no way of knowing if there is a god or not, and no real reason to assume there is one.
@lowcomedy Why would mere faith in "something" that may or may not care that I even exist ever further our knowledge of anything. That would entail some decision on that "somethings" part to impart information divinely. I have yet to receive original meaningful information through mediation, hallucination, praying or logic. The quest for enlightenment, which may be a myth in that all one can really attain is conviction, continues.
".....Yeah that's right, Atheists ignore evidence, not like Creationists who have MOUNTAINS of evidence supporting their beliefs......"
What further evidence do you require for the Principle of Causality, dolt? What makes you think that the NONSENSE of Darwinism which asserts that SHIT JUST HAPPENS - FOR NO REASON - if you wait long enough is a better explanation for the way the Universe is and works? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Time to go back to school junior. Evolution is one of the most robust scientific theories in existence. Denying it just makes you look uneducated, retarded or more likely... brainwashed. Which is it?
And before you embarrass yourself again by saying something stupid like "Evolution is only a theory", look up what theory means in a scientific context. Gravity is "only a theory too".
i still wonder how we dismiss scientology and mormonism and what not crazy hook religions, but still guard christianity so readily...i guess man just needs something to justify life
one thing creationists love to do is equal faith with science. Science doesn't work through faith, it isn't a religion. There isn't any central authority that alone dictates the universe is billions of yrs old. It doesn't have to be so, but it is when mutual non-contradicting sums of evidence all point on that same direction. It isn't so because science has a stranglehold on truth through authority. does any creationist wonder how science knows what it knows?
@lzoli18B they are simply anti-science, i honestly hate those people, they are sooo ungrateful of the things science has gave them, like a tripled lifespan or just things that make us comfortable like AC, its fucking pathetic how adults can denie demonstrable facts
@Jbarrtndrsr Not that I’ve seen, (unless you can count a 12 y/o living in his moms basement). And I doubt I ever will because 10 creations combined, could not stand up to the facts, logic, and reasoning AronRa presents in everything I’ve seen of his.
One of the many problems with the U.S.A.'s education system on a college level, is that we have all these "DR.S" of math, and music,and english, and education, and....you name it. we have an ' expert' in that field. They to, can not be wrong. The human ego is so fragile...so childlike...no matter what your degree states. Fear rules in the animal kingdom. What is your view?
Sincerely,
Billie Watkins Jr student at the UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS 2010
i know i'm being overly picky but given "abracadabra" is aramaic, why is it written in hebrew script at 06:10? moreover, it's spelled incorrectly and it's written from left to right, while both aramaic and hebrew are written from right to left... sorry, i just couldn't resist :) AronRa for president of NWO! :)
Its sad that because there is SOOOO much evidence for it evolution has become so incredibly easy to defend that even people on youtube can defend it EASILY with a little research. Of course its even easier to cover your ears, close your eyes, and say la la la la la la la! as loud as you can.
I cannot attribute this quote, but it seems to fit here, replacing the word philosophy with science: "Science is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned."
If someone knows the origin of that quote, please let me know.
"Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned."
quoted in Dennett, Daniel C. (2006). Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon (1st ed. ed.). Viking Penguin. pp. p. 17. ISBN 0-670-03472-X.
Good work but please take a freakin breath now and then. Whew!
thadpeters 4 days ago
what is that film showing when he was talking about the scientist Owen? Anyone?
forlornfoghorn 6 days ago
@forlornfoghorn Darwin's Dangerous Idea is a very good biography by Daniel Dennet. Enjoy.
/watch?v=910dz5sCb1I
AronRa 3 days ago
@AronRa Cheers man. Also i really liked this series, good job.
forlornfoghorn 1 day ago
Actually @aronra these lunatics make many predictions. The first one that leaps to mind is Ken Ham with his "what would we expect to find if there was a global flood?" spiel, with his answer being "billions of dead things in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth." Similarly, Carl Baugh in his brilliantly stupid programme "creation in the 21st century" (a must watch) references the grand canyon, of all things, as something that matches the expected consequences of a global flood.
veryveryintense 3 weeks ago
9:42 "God could have created her with the APPEARANCE of having being murdered"! That just made me lol, big time.
fuzzydude64 1 month ago in playlist More videos from AronRa
i love the "beg forgiveness for" line, so funny
hughheggen 1 month ago
Can someone explain 5:14 to me?
AceofDlamonds 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Energy transformed is the only theory that corrects the "secular" theology that proves that secularism is a flaw in the process. However Secular wants to protect the dinosaurs and standard train evolution....I accept....The earth was NOT created in 7 (24 hour) days. We can only surmise how many millennium transpired before genetic insertion was performed. However...You soul is real even under scientific theory. And you fools will find that you exist after the body expels your energy
Crucible0Patriot 2 months ago
@Crucible0Patriot "You soul is real even under scientific theory. And you fools will find that you exist after the body expels your energy" How on earth can you know this. Have you died or seen a body "expel energy"? Can you provide an experiment that would prove this? Can you show a paper showing that the body has a soul? If not then these are blind speculations asserted as truth and therefore you are being dishonest in the extreme.
Gibbons3457 2 months ago
@Crucible0Patriot "However Secular wants to protect the dinosaurs and standard train evolution" No one is "protecting" dinosaurs or evolution, what is being done is the wilful retardation of the population by religious fundies who reject demonstrable reality in favour of a book of fables which cannot be proven to be factual and can be demonstrably shown to be false on multiple accounts.
Your choice of only picking Dinosaurs out of the thousands of fossil fauna is telling of your knowledge.
Gibbons3457 2 months ago
@Crucible0Patriot Reading your jumbled word salad is amusing. "Secular theology"? You obviously don't know what the word, 'secular' even means. Neither is the soul "real under scientific theory". You obviously don't know what a scientific theory is either. Suffice to say that souls are unsubstantiated assumptions, supposed and asserted without evidence; being magical, supernatural, untestable, unfalsifiable, and therefore NOT 'real' in any way science could recognize.
AronRa 2 months ago 31
This has been flagged as spam show
@AronRa @Crucible0Patriot "Reading your jumbled word salad is amusing. 'Secular theology'? You obviously don't know what the word, 'secular' even means. Neither is the soul 'real under scientific theory'. You obviously don't know what a scientific theory is either. Suffice to say that souls are unsubstantiated assumptions, supposed and asserted without evidence; being magical, supernatural, untestable, unfalsifiable, and therefore NOT 'real' in any way science could recognize."
Brilliant! Thx.
lease2coach1 4 days ago
@Crucible0Patriot
Prove souls exist without silly fairytales or pseudoscience
sonykroket 2 months ago
@Crucible0Patriot "However...You soul is real even under scientific theory" What is this theory called are can you point me to the published, peer-review research papers demonstrating this. I am curious and eager to read them.
davidsfriend01 1 month ago 2
@nuckchorrisrex yep, they are responsible for global warming, too.
matthewlane 2 months ago
Did you mean »E = mc²«? Unicode for the win. (-:
virumoz 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Evolution is the only "scientific theory" that needs laws to protect it!"
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked"
Galatians 6:7
"You turn things upside down, as if the potter were thought to be like the clay! Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, "He did not make me"? Can the pot say of the potter, "He knows nothing"?"
Isaiah 29:16
No wonder our country is so much worse than it was, people believing the atheist myth of evolution....
co2isgoodal 3 months ago
@co2isgoodal
If you actually believe our country is "worse than it was" 150 years ago, you need your head examined.
TheZooCrew 3 months ago
@co2isgoodal Evolution is the only scientific theory systematically attacked by those opposed to the scientific method.
AronRa 2 months ago 26
@AronRa
Not so! They also go after the Big Bang, Pair Production, Stellar Nucleosynthesis, Planetary Accretion, and the Laws of Thermodynamics!
rkyeun 2 weeks ago
@co2isgoodal
Holy shit, you really are an idiot
Quoting bronzeage comicbooks is doing the opposite of helping your silly point.
Heres some scripture:
Sony 18:42:
"If evolution is false, never shall ye visit a doctor or hospital again, thou relidork"
There ya go
sonykroket 2 months ago
@co2isgoodal I love when Christians try to prove that the contents of the Bible are true by quoting the Bible.
Rimmer7 1 month ago 3
@Rimmer7 That's exactly the point at which my eyes start to glaze over. I am physically incapable of listening to or reading it.
palerider1775 1 month ago
@co2isgoodal
"So the man took his concubine and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go." Thus Saith the Lord!
...Look, just because something is in the Bible -- or ANY holy book! -- doesn't mean you should automatically follow it, do it, or respect the idea of it without proper questioning and reason.
TheNewHijabi 1 month ago
@co2isgoodal You're a fuckin' moron.
Drweavil 1 week ago
You've put the Aramaic words back to front, Making it read "Arba arbadac" - which is complete nonsense. Please, correct it.
Snoosmumrik 3 months ago
What's the cartoon at 5:50? I remember seeing this as a kid, but I don't remember what it is.
Wotanraven 3 months ago
@Wotanraven The cartoon at 5:50 is 'Yellow Submarine' (1968) starring the Beatles.
AronRa 3 months ago
Aron. I f**king love you.
derman077 3 months ago
@sngcoach thanks
shadowmax889 3 months ago
@aronra where can i find the dramatization of the Dover Vs Kitzmiller case??
shadowmax889 4 months ago
@shadowmax889 YouTube it. It's very interesting and I strongly recommend you to approach this case, know the way creationists acted in it and how they were just blatantly PWNED!
maujo2009 3 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Here's my issue : To assume that the supernatural does not exist requires the same amount of assumptive thinking as saying it does exist simly because of the stated fact that it cannot be measured. Therefore equal amounts of faith are involved. Secondly, if nothing transends the material what was the cause of matter which we know is not static or eternal? Perhaps nothing became something? To assume this again puts you in the place of drawing answers from something not measurable = faith.
SteadyD4Jesus 4 months ago
@SteadyD4Jesus
Well, you're completely wrong.
To assume the supernatural does not exist is merely accepting the null hypothesis, which is required in all areas of science. There must be evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
"what was the cause of matter which we know is not static or eternal?"
We don't know this. In fact, all evidence points to matter/energy always existing.
"Perhaps nothing became something? "
This straw man was beaten to death 50 years ago.
TheZooCrew 4 months ago
@TheZooCrew I'm sure you wouldn't mind refering me to your sources so I can see this conclusive evidence regarding the eternality of matter?
SteadyD4Jesus 4 months ago
@SteadyD4Jesus To say that something can neither be measured nor indicated by anything, that there is no way to distinguish such claims from the illusion of delusion, requires no faith of any kind. I can truthfully say that such things aren't evidently real, because that statement would still be verifiably accurate even if supernatural things actually DO exist. Faith on the other hand states as fact things which are not neither implied nor supported by evidence, and is therefore dishonest.
AronRa 4 months ago 19
evidence over interest bitches!
hempartist420 4 months ago
@AronRa
I can't praise your videos enough. They're so detailed and richly informative that they continue to reward with repeated viewings.
Love that "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" scene from PLANET OF THE APES!
SpaceOdyssey56 4 months ago
The only reason the pioneers were religious was because you'd get whacked if you weren't in those days.
And even then they'd still fuck you over, look what happened to Galileo.
sonykroket 4 months ago
What is the movie playing throughout Most of the Rant About Owen?
ThePuppyTurtle 4 months ago
@ThePuppyTurtle PBS 'Darwin's Dangerous Idea', script by Daniel Dennet.
gamesbok 4 months ago
What is funny is that despite all the talk about "supernatural" beings, if lets say goblins would exist they wouldn't be supernatural because their existence could theoretically be proven one way or another.
inotaishu1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed in design or useless.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT ABOUT THE STARS? Gravity explains how the order found in the precise courses of trillions of stars is maintained, but gravity can't explain the origin of that order! Did all the trillions stars agree to get out of each others way? C'mon! Disorder in the universe is because of chance, but the order is because of design. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article that examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of both transitional forms and lack of sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Say Aron, I just recently got into a long-winded email debate with a user by the name of Truthislife7 and he said that he tried to get into a debate with you but nothing came of it. I'd like to know your take on this issue. Please and thank you.
cadman2300 5 months ago
8:24 Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition. :)
Akira625 5 months ago
Why would any religious person even argue against evolution? Just say that everything in Genesis wasn't literal like you do every other time something science presents makes too much sense. "God days" explain everything. Millions of years of evolution happened in one "god day". Just divide the 4.5 Billion, or whatever it is number by 7 and claim 1 God Day=600 Million years. Then you have a ridiculous time system 4 anything. Like 2000 years is so fast God can't see it. It's in the spirit world.
Reip187 5 months ago
Please speak a bit slower or make a few pauses.
blenderpanzi 5 months ago
Owen looks like an evil, mad magician. o_o
demonella 5 months ago
@demonella He seems like a 19th century troll. If internet trolls had a god, he'd be a likely candidate.
roxyosox122 5 months ago
4:15 - 4:44 The cling tightly to their position, never letting go. They will go through any length to defend it, even if it has no evidence supporting it, even if it means violating their cherished moral codes. They will lie and deny, even when confronted with mountains of evidence against their viewpoint. They never see their contradictions and inaccuracies, and don't care even when others point them out to them. That's not truth, that's not reason, that's mental illness.
Akira625 6 months ago
That Carl Sagan quote near the end reminded me what I like most about President Obama. He has admitted fault in politics.
Nakarti 6 months ago
Comment removed
luker4459 7 months ago
AronRa or anyone who knows; from where are the clips with Owen, Huxley and Darwin taken?
FerretBob 7 months ago
@FerretBob Those scenes came from 'Darwin's Dangerous Idea', written by Daniel Dennet.
AronRa 7 months ago 5
@FerretBob Gravitationalist's has the episodes on his channel.
77Totems 7 months ago in playlist Falsehood of Creationism
Comment removed
DeadManWorkingWS 7 months ago
verbose and boring...
bullviii 8 months ago
@bullviii I'm sorry that you're not intelligent enough to understand the fairly simple dialogue. :<
Zemed87 7 months ago
@Zemed87 foundational falsehoods?? without ever providing the foundations he's speaking about?
long winded nonsense. he makes the claim that there is no evidence for creation and that evolution is in fact
real science. both assertions are incorrect. each vlog is a slightly modified regurgitation of the prior.
the typical atheist tack of verbage over honesty and accuracy... but you buy it wholesale...of course.
bullviii 7 months ago
@bullviii Hey, nice assumptions.
So tell me, how come creation isn't accepted by the vast majority of scientists? Is it just a big ol' conspiracy to cover up the real truth, maybe?
Zemed87 7 months ago
@bullviii
I see someone is religiously opposed to Google and libraries.
All the facts about evolution stated by AronRa can and have been objectively verified and all "evidence" for creation is the product of distortions, logical fallacies, and baldfaced lies.
TheZooCrew 7 months ago
@bullviii
In addition, it's rather absurd to accuse this video of all 17 of being "verbose." AronRa keeps this one pretty damn straightforward and it's much easier to follow than the 11th.
There are a healthy number of simple questions asked about "creation science" starting around the four-minute mark, and if you really had anything to contribute, you'd provide an answer to one or more of these questions. Instead, you resort to insults because you have no answers.
TheZooCrew 7 months ago
Thanks Aronra for using that trial scene in Planet of the Apes @9:54. Probably one of the best 15 minutes in movie history. I couldn't really appreciate the depth of that movie and all of the major topics of religion, science, biology, history, race, and class that the movie touched upon, until I was an adult and had the ability to grasp these subjects.
amenra13 9 months ago
@amenra13 yeah saw it last year for the first time in like 30 years, and had no idea it was so sophisticated.
smoking in the space pod aside, of course;>
cruciphile 8 months ago
Only Science will send you back home healthy from the Hospital Bed........ Guess what Religion Creation will certainly bury you in the Earth........ that too pretty soon.
sidharth0384 9 months ago
Those who think that they know what they already believe will never learn any better.
jessemaurais 9 months ago
5:15
Shiver...
bluemoonrising26 9 months ago
Looks like a horn on it's nose to me.... lol...
bogan182 9 months ago
'Evolutionist' science is giving us molecular technology with applications for agricultural, medical and industrial applications. creationist science is giving us nothing.
Put down your fairytale book, tell your invisible friend to go away and get a fucking reality check you pathetic little parasites.
ganados0 10 months ago
Man, this guy is a doofus. Start looking to the facts and the evidence for a change. Try to get over your government indoctrination center biases.
thechessstick 10 months ago
@thechessstick You are an idiot.
ThePsychoReturns 10 months ago
@thechessstick
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
YOU FUCKING MORON.
bluemoonrising26 9 months ago 3
@thechessstick
It's you who sounds indoctrinated, you reli-douche
sonykroket 9 months ago
Watching AronRa disassemble those creationists was like watching Bruce Lee beat the crap out of a room full stock henchmen.
TheNamelessCharacter 10 months ago
hey, did you make up that calvin and hobbes comic, or did you get it from somewhere else? I know almost for certain that it's not a real calvin and hobbes comic, since I've read nearly all of them. but it actually has the feel and spirit of a calvin and hobbes comic, which I find impressive!
RaustBD 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow, evolutionists will believe anything. What a bunch of dolts they are. Do yourself a favor and read a few of A. E. Wilder-Smith books and also Robert Dick Wilson's book "A Scientific Investigation of the Old Testament". Do you know that Noah's Ark was discovered? Also, Sodom and Gomorrah, the Red Sea crossing site, the real Mount Sinai the Ark of the Covenant? Yes, the proof is there. All one must do is seek.
thechessstick 11 months ago
@thechessstick i think noahs arc was supposedly discovered about 15 or more times by now. i doubt you can find an old boat or old piece of wood that some creationist whore wont say is or from noahs arc :P
itsuyo211 10 months ago
@itsuyo211 You think? Satan has used that old trick many times. Making people disbelieve the real thing because of some phony one. I mean look at how many people are turned away from the real Church because of the Roman Catholic "Church". You know the one where "Fathers" molest little boys. Ron Wyatt did indeed discover Noah's ark.
thechessstick 10 months ago
@thechessstick you think satan planted false ark pieces? whats the point of that? if he can do that why not just completely get rid of the "real" ark? even doing nothing would be better than planting false pieces. if people keep finding fakes theyll prolly keep looking for the real one. if they keep finding nothing eventually they might stop.
itsuyo211 10 months ago
@itsuyo211 LOL. Funny. You are undoubtedly an evolutionists, aren't you? You won't even take the time to check out Ron Wyatt's discoveries for yourself. The only investigation your evolutardation will allow you to do is to view a few anti-Ron Wyatt sites. Man you evolutionists are stupid.
thechessstick 10 months ago
@thechessstick youre kind of a dick :(
itsuyo211 10 months ago
@thechessstick
"check out Ron Wyatt's discoveries "
When just about every group of fundy bible lying god pretender says he is talking crap, why would anyone believe him.
gorilla199uncensored 10 months ago
@gorilla199uncensored You evolutards are a bunch of parrots. You are so evolutarded that you can't even think on your own. You're just a bunch of government indoctrinated dolts. If you had been taught Islam in your government indoctrination center (read that school) you would be Muslim. Stand up like a man and think for yourself for once.
thechessstick 10 months ago
@thechessstick
"you would be Muslim. "
LOL thats funny coming from the xtian who is only xtian because its parents are.
Theres a reason the vast majority of xtians accept evolutiona s fact and know the bible is not true on many many things :)
gorilla199uncensored 10 months ago
@gorilla199uncensored Those aren't real Christians. Those are phonies like Obama.
thechessstick 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thechessstick
"Those aren't real Christians."
Well they dissagree with you fundies and theres 10 times as many of them as you fundies so.......
gorilla199uncensored 10 months ago
@gorilla199uncensored Only one of the 10 lepers that Jesus healed came to thank him. 10%. A remnant.
thechessstick 10 months ago
@thechessstick
Thanks for the imaginary fairy tale.
But theres a reason most xtians accept the fact of evolution and that the bible is not literal.
gorilla199uncensored 10 months ago
@thechessstick
"Those aren't real Christians."
Theres plenty of xtains who say you are not one.
Define what a real xtian is please?
Extra points for bible references to prove you definition.
gorilla199uncensored 10 months ago
@thechessstick "If you had been taught Islam in your government indoctrination center...you would be Muslim." You know there are atheists from Muslim countries, its just that their environment is not as tolerant so they often have to remain closeted their whole lives. Some of the most famous are Tariq Ali, Ibn Warraq, and Salman Rushdie. Clasically, one should consult Omar Khayyam, or the "Muslim deist" views of Avicenna. So I'd like to think I'd still be an atheist were I born in a Muslim land.
bcgonynor 10 months ago
@bcgonynor You are a government indoctrinated sheep. They teach evolution and and old Earth in Muslim countries, too. That is why there are atheists there. Remember that the god of Islam is also the god of Islam. We know him as Satan.
thechessstick 10 months ago
@thechessstick You know, there were atheists long before evolutionary biology developed, or the age of the Earth was calculated, although an understanding of how the world works does discourage magical explanations. Just curious - to your mind, what is the "government's" goal in brainwashing everyone to be atheists? What could they gain from such a development?
bcgonynor 10 months ago
@bcgonynor The simple lie of evolution was something that was started by Satan in the garden when he tempted Eve. "Ye shall be as gods". The age of the Earth was calculated by Jacob Ussher long long ago. He calculated the date of creation to be 4004 B.C. You evolutards are something else. At least the book of Genesis has answers. All you evolutionists have is imagination. Of course you guys will believe about anything.
thechessstick 10 months ago
@thechessstick How does the admonition of a serpent that we might "be as gods" have anything to do with evolutionary theory. Gods are immortal, supernatural, and unchanging. That's antithetical to a system based on natural processes which govern changes made possible by an endless repitition of sex and death. How does that relate? If the Earth were only 4,000 years old, how do you explain thermodynamics? Oh, that's right, by magic! Like a snake talking or people living for 500 years in 2000 BC.
bcgonynor 10 months ago
@bcgonynor People did live to be that old. Noah's skeleton was found to be over 12 feet long. God is the Creator. He as God can operate outside the bounds of thermodynamics. That is simply a given. God, by the way, can and will intervene.
thechessstick 10 months ago
@thechessstick Right, magic, like I said. Amusing to be accused of being gullible by someone who would rather believe that the Earth is dependent on constant extraterrestial magical intervention for its basic processes, than give up the most literal possible interpretation of the Babylonian cosmology that was shoehorned into his favorite storybook by some temple scribes who didn't know shit from tits. How could one tell a skeleton was Noah's? You're simply hopeless. Please don't bother replying.
bcgonynor 10 months ago
@thechessstick and where is this skeleton now?
oaajbs 8 months ago
@bcgonynor It would be between 6 and 10 thousand.
bogan182 9 months ago
@bogan182 What's the difference? If we're going to ignore the mountain of evidence that the Earth is billions of years old, why not ante up a little bit? That said, I apologize for my clerical error. Of course I was aware that the Earth began on October 23, 4004 BC, at noon on Sunday, as conclusively proven by Lord Ussher. I apologize for my ignorance of the exact details of INSANE BULLSHIT.
bcgonynor 9 months ago 28
@bcgonynor Apology accepted =]
bogan182 9 months ago
Aronra, is that you dressed up like Jesus in 6:12?
sirdelrio 11 months ago 4
@sirdelrio That was Halloween in a downtown Dallas nightclub called 'The Church'. I had just turned 33.
AronRa 11 months ago 24
@AronRa you look silly XD
Hypastpist 11 months ago
@AronRa Sucks that the Hebrew words were written left-to-right instead of right-to-left. It reads Arba-Arbadak instead of Abra-Kadabra. Only when he pointed out the picture I made sense of the text.
MindLessWiz 10 months ago
The closest I have come to proving god exists to myself is by contemplating how ones DNA is a mini supercomputer capable of holding all the blueprints for a particular organismic. Then also wonder how DNA, which is present in even the simplest single celled organism, started the evolution train. Then add to that the data in the DNA which is like a language of life. Is this language natural? These complex life equations occurring without an author seems as improbable as this proving god exists.
yrrebyam666 11 months ago
@yrrebyam666 Then who authored the author?
lowcomedy 11 months ago
@lowcomedy If one goes so far to admit that there is even the possibility that there is an author there is no reason to go into the complexities of god creating him self. God is a primitive yet still somehow valid explanation for phenomena that humans don't, won't, or can't understand. You might as well ask why witches didn't save themselves from being burned at the stake. I love god, but I wonder if god loves me.
yrrebyam666 11 months ago
@yrrebyam666 God is NOT a valid explanation for ANYTHING, as it explains nothing.
lowcomedy 11 months ago
@lowcomedy I said it is still somehow, meaning it is still used as an explanation. Atheism and theism are both full of ones own personal opinion. When I said I wonder if god loves me if is because i wonder if there is a god and I can't wait for science to prove it one way or the other. God is not a valid explanation for anything, yes I know, but what is? Also, the lack of a belief in god is not a valid explanation for anything. Evidence I know, god I think, love I feel.
yrrebyam666 11 months ago
@yrrebyam666 That's all well and dandy. There could be a god, but nothing we have ever attributed to it has ever furthered our knowledge of anything. we have no way of knowing if there is a god or not, and no real reason to assume there is one.
lowcomedy 11 months ago
@lowcomedy Why would mere faith in "something" that may or may not care that I even exist ever further our knowledge of anything. That would entail some decision on that "somethings" part to impart information divinely. I have yet to receive original meaningful information through mediation, hallucination, praying or logic. The quest for enlightenment, which may be a myth in that all one can really attain is conviction, continues.
yrrebyam666 11 months ago
@lowcomedy
Except some ancient fantasy novels written by people from the bronze age or medieval ages.
NKA23 11 months ago
7:23 I'd like that shirt.
SabresGuy5 11 months ago
5:16 is going to give me nightmares. That is some seriously scary shit.
bluemoonrising26 11 months ago
You can't spell ignorant without ignore! lol
derman077 1 year ago
Ah, pious fraud.
tunabomber111 1 year ago
I just noticed that at 6:09 is a picture of (a younger) Aron dressed as jesus! lol
kirke420 1 year ago
Creation science = apologetics. Brilliant point.
ReligiousFiction 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"cletusnze has been terminated due to multiple or severe violations of our Community Guidelines. - YouTube"
LOL
warren52nz 1 year ago
"Atheism is just an excuse to reject Reality by denying It regardless of what evidence is provided for it "
Hey I was drinking milk when I read that it came out my nose!!!
Yeah that's right, Atheists ignore evidence, not like Creationists who have MOUNTAINS of evidence supporting their beliefs. ROFLMAO 8^D
We've never heard of paedophilic PRIESTS have we?? Such high moral standards!!! Hahaha.
warren52nz 1 year ago
@warren52nz
".....Yeah that's right, Atheists ignore evidence, not like Creationists who have MOUNTAINS of evidence supporting their beliefs......"
What further evidence do you require for the Principle of Causality, dolt? What makes you think that the NONSENSE of Darwinism which asserts that SHIT JUST HAPPENS - FOR NO REASON - if you wait long enough is a better explanation for the way the Universe is and works? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
And what have pedophilia to do with Theism?
cletusnze 1 year ago
@cletusnze " NONSENSE of Darwinism"
Time to go back to school junior. Evolution is one of the most robust scientific theories in existence. Denying it just makes you look uneducated, retarded or more likely... brainwashed. Which is it?
And before you embarrass yourself again by saying something stupid like "Evolution is only a theory", look up what theory means in a scientific context. Gravity is "only a theory too".
warren52nz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cletusnze "Darwinism which asserts that SHIT JUST HAPPENS - FOR NO REASON"
Only it does NOT.
Helge129 1 year ago
@cletusnze ? "
"What makes you think that the NONSENSE of Darwinism which asserts that SHIT JUST HAPPENS - FOR NO REASON "
AronRa explained why this, in an earlier video in the series, is a wrong assumption to take.
Necazian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have sex with monkeys!
G0lfYankee 1 year ago
I would have loved to have seen Behe's facial expression as the lawyer was piling up those books. LOL
Educateftw 1 year ago
Why... does that ape have statues of dicks on the table in front of it?
Littlebiger 1 year ago
Thumbs up if you enjoy both the thoughts and the voice.
WillGo7 1 year ago
9:00 - Carl Sagan quote FTW.
pdblouin33 1 year ago
i still wonder how we dismiss scientology and mormonism and what not crazy hook religions, but still guard christianity so readily...i guess man just needs something to justify life
managarm1349 1 year ago
8:22 Nobody expects the spanish inquisistion.
SoulStealer124 1 year ago
The letters of the first and second Aramaic words are backwards.
tjduck85 1 year ago
LMAO! Excellent touch using the Daffy Duck cartoon Duck Amuck, I LOVE that short!
NUTCASE71733 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and it's here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor
just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it's probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
slipshodcoqbgg 1 year ago
one thing creationists love to do is equal faith with science. Science doesn't work through faith, it isn't a religion. There isn't any central authority that alone dictates the universe is billions of yrs old. It doesn't have to be so, but it is when mutual non-contradicting sums of evidence all point on that same direction. It isn't so because science has a stranglehold on truth through authority. does any creationist wonder how science knows what it knows?
lzoli18B 1 year ago
@lzoli18B they are simply anti-science, i honestly hate those people, they are sooo ungrateful of the things science has gave them, like a tripled lifespan or just things that make us comfortable like AC, its fucking pathetic how adults can denie demonstrable facts
blazereef 1 year ago
wonder what that creationist shirt said?
blazereef 1 year ago
6:10 Aron
Sabohaque 1 year ago
A correction, it wasn't the Spanish Inquisition that imprisoned Galileo but the Roman Catholic Church in Italy. Otherwise great video.
slicingwater 1 year ago
@slicingwater
Yes that is true but the inquisition was sponsored by the church until its end in the mid-1800s
Michael6504 1 year ago
Have there been any documentaries rebutting this one or along the lines of attempted explanation of creationism?
Jbarrtndrsr 1 year ago
@Jbarrtndrsr Not that I’ve seen, (unless you can count a 12 y/o living in his moms basement). And I doubt I ever will because 10 creations combined, could not stand up to the facts, logic, and reasoning AronRa presents in everything I’ve seen of his.
Talamasca124 1 year ago
One of the many problems with the U.S.A.'s education system on a college level, is that we have all these "DR.S" of math, and music,and english, and education, and....you name it. we have an ' expert' in that field. They to, can not be wrong. The human ego is so fragile...so childlike...no matter what your degree states. Fear rules in the animal kingdom. What is your view?
Sincerely,
Billie Watkins Jr student at the UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS 2010
BillieSamWatkinsJr 1 year ago
OMG It's Waldorf from the Muppets in that grilled cheese. All hail the new messiahs, Statler and Waldorf.
Jonstern1983 1 year ago
@Jonstern1983 I thought it looked a bit like The Dude, myself
Bernstein1917 1 year ago
@Kwinnky Cuz people don't like to spend 10 seconds researching it online.
zzyzx0788 1 year ago
is the name of that movie darwins dangerous idea?
treyvinmartin 1 year ago
i know i'm being overly picky but given "abracadabra" is aramaic, why is it written in hebrew script at 06:10? moreover, it's spelled incorrectly and it's written from left to right, while both aramaic and hebrew are written from right to left... sorry, i just couldn't resist :) AronRa for president of NWO! :)
mivalmival 1 year ago
2:16 so there has been bias in science.
lambchopxoxo 1 year ago
@lambchopxoxo Yes, when influenced by religion.
ShadowxBoi 1 year ago
@lambchopxoxo
Yes. There absolutely is a bias in science. A HUGE and overwhelming bias.
Science is biased towards reality, to the exclusion of falsehood and ignorance.
rkyeun 1 year ago
Its sad that because there is SOOOO much evidence for it evolution has become so incredibly easy to defend that even people on youtube can defend it EASILY with a little research. Of course its even easier to cover your ears, close your eyes, and say la la la la la la la! as loud as you can.
shldflght 1 year ago
I cannot attribute this quote, but it seems to fit here, replacing the word philosophy with science: "Science is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned."
If someone knows the origin of that quote, please let me know.
Largo64 1 year ago
@Largo64
Actually the quote is about philosophy:
"Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned."
quoted in Dennett, Daniel C. (2006). Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon (1st ed. ed.). Viking Penguin. pp. p. 17. ISBN 0-670-03472-X.
ozpowermo 1 year ago
@ozpowermo Thanks!
Largo64 1 year ago
01:13 That guy discovered some ting real special :D
CrazyIcelander8321 1 year ago