Al Sharpton believes that a vote for Obama was a vote for socialism. watch?v=KCpINI5aVy0 Al Sharpton wants to share the wealth. “Al Sharpton: We Won't Have True Social Justice Until Everything is Equal in Everybody's House” watch?v=95bcEb1rV18
.
Sharpton should start by giving up his $5 million (from celebrity net worth com) It’s also worth noting Hilter was a socialist that seemed to follow the Communist Manifesto.
some one seriously needs to off that dumbass. All he does is bitch about everything. Blacks wanted equal rights and now they want everyone to kiss theyre ass. Its only a matter of time before the white man gets pissed about shit like this
Number #1,equal rights was never yours to give us . #2 You are not white, you are caucasion . #3 As far as getting pissed, it will only be because you want things back the way they use to be. Now i wasnt sold on Jena 6 at all . People have to start taking responsibility for their actions. Someone should have displayed some type of diplomacy .
If it was six white kids beating a black kid they would be in jail and shitloads of whites would demand it. Brainwashed by media for years whites always call other whites racist at the drop of a pin. Paving the way for douchebags like Sharpton and Jackson to gain control. Wake up white people!!!
So Mr. Bell shouldn't be sitting in jail? Hmmm....I have a solution, why not stop violently beating white people up? Then you wouldn't be in jail! See? Problem solved!
It makes my day to see Al Sharpton make all you white people mad. I love the comments but you are the same people who wont say that shit to a Collard Green eating Niggers face lol. I cant wait until Obama is president.
al sharpton is an embarassment and a hinderance to black people's progress....he wants u to use the victimology mentality...he's an ASSHOLE and so r u, by the way obama is who he is because he was educated and raised by white people. dummy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Black Panthers weren't about starting violence ignorant people, maybe you should read something on the Panthers before placing stupid comments on here.
HAHA! This mollie got arrested. I hope this black radical racist, in the closet Black Panther gets run over next time he decides to block traffic in NYC for a criminal Sean Bell. FUCK Sharpton he's a nappy headed hoe.
The Jena situation not withstanding,Al Sharpton should not be a mouthpiece for anyone or any cause until he acknowledges that the Tawana Brawley rape charges were a hoax and he apologies for calling a white business owner in Harlem,"A White Interloper". Until then,he has no credibility.
fuck al sharpton!!!fuck al sharpton!!!! fuck al sharpton!!!! -cant we all get along without this DIPSHIT-fuck al sharpton!!!!-fuck al sharptin!!!!-fuck al sharpton!!
(eeuumuscle) which ones?; The kids that hung the nooses on the tree, the kid that hit Purvis on the head with a bottle and jumped him, or Justin Barker who brought a Shotgun to school and was not charged. Or the D.A, for Malicious Prosecution? Which criminals in Jena are you referring to?
Barker WAS arrested AND expelled for bringing a gun to school (which was in his truck, NOT used to threaten anyone). There is not only ZERO evidence of Bailey being hit with a bottle, the evidence STRONGLY supports the claim that he made that up many weeks later. Mr. Washington has explained why he didn't prosecute the noosehangers. Get some facts Black Tree. Seriously. Go read about Bryant Purvis' latest violent assault or something if checking your facts is too much to ask.
(techas) Barker was arrested and NEVER charged. Is that research enough 4 u. Obviously the noosehangers (terrorist) were not only never charged, but their expulsions were overturned. How does a victims claim equal zero evidence? Because it is not in te police report does not mean that it didn't happen. Was Bryant Purvis charged with attempted murder in his 'latest violent assault'? If not, I don't know how that changes the argument one bit.
(keni) and attempted murder is when somebody is actually had an attempt on their life, not when they get discharged from the hospital in 3 hours and go to a school banquet later that night. Most people would just say, "he got knocked the f$%k out", doesn't make it right, but it damn sure doesn't mean you charge some kids w/ attempted murder. Reeboks have never been classified as a murder weapon, until this case. Justin Barker brought a shotgun to school, now that is a murder weapon.
The problem in society is that people look up to people like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and when they and people like you say it's okay to have 6 kids beat up another kid black or white and get a concussion and left for dead which you "conveniently" left out who are you to say it's not attempted murder?Thank God Barack Obama said it was wrong but then he was called by Jesse Jackson as trying to act white who has the real problem??????
I vehemently agree. People got behing the civil rights movement when it was led by Martin Luther King because he actually wanted blacks and whites to leave together, while now Jackson and Sharpton insist on playing the "race card" and alienating anyone who is not black.
(Keni) Simple question, if you were in a car accident, and left 'half dead', would you be discharged from the hospital in 2.5 hours? If you were, would you go to a school party later that evening? Don't put Barack in this, because he also said it was wrong to charge those juveniles as an adult, for a school yard fight. So thank God for sensibility.
blacktreemedia what you don't understand is that in life nothing is exact when a kid is beaten you never know what could happen he "could" have been killed this kid doesn't need 6 kids pissed off over a noose risking his life in any way and they need to be punished luckily he was able to go to a school party but anything could have happened in the beating and that is why the beating should not be condoned. That is what is sensible so try again. Nice try though.
He didn't go to any "party" anyway. He went to a ring ceremony, was allowed to go up first, was helped on and off stage, was applauded for his strength and went home. But you made real good points keni.
The truth about Jena is coming out and you sick bastards defending these animals for attacking a random kid 6 on 1 re being shown up for what you are.
I know the video and the case. you might want to do your research. The black guy later admited that him and his friend instigated the fight earlier that night because one of the guys knows the white girl. and he was the one who threw the beer botle. thats why they were jumped. Is this all you have to offer. Sumb dumb ass trying to get another free ride in life. GTFO
so if Justin Barker instigated the fight, than the Jena 6 would be justified in fighting him, 6 on 1, if that is indeed what happened? Because it sounds like you are saying that the group of 6 white guys were justified because he instigated the fight? Is that what u are saying?
No the guy walked into the mcdonalds with the beer bottle and threw it at them. The white guy beat up by the jena six was in the wrong place at the wrong time. If the white guys jumped on him for no reason then i say throw thier asses in jail as well.
Hey guy. Dont be stupid. you know how friends are. you start fighting in the heat of the moment your friends will jump in. Dont go off subject. what they did was wrong and its time for them to pay for it. Enough said
(Galaron) I don't know how I am being stupid, or how this is not on the same subject. If you are justifying 'how in the heat of the moment your friends will jump in' and we are discussing a 1-on-6 fight. And you say that the white men were justified because they were provoked, I can not help but to draw a correlation between the two cases.
It has been said that Justin Barker provoked Bell and others. But, maybe it should be different for the 6 white guys, or maybe the 6 white guys should've been charged with attempted murder? Who am i to say? I am sorry if I offended you my friend, I was just asking a question. I was hoping you can help me understand your opinion better.
meaning the jenna 6 went looking for the white guy with the soul person of fighting him. the 6 white guys that jumped on the black guy were basicly fighting in self defence. ill admit it shouldnt have been 6 on 2. But like i said in the heat of the moment they were not gonna stop to decide who should be fighting
So when 6 white guys fight one black guy, it is 'self defense', but when a white kid is knocked out for provocation, it is pre-meditated and attempted murder. Okay, I understand perfectly clear now. You are right, it is two totally different circumstances.
wtf?? i didnt say that. The guy came in and threw a fucking beer bottle at them. So in turn he got his black ass kicked. with the jenna 6 the kid is walking down the road and one of the brothas go. he theres that honky lets go kick the shit out of him. Thats the damn difference. Jeez man noone is that fucking retarded.
Oh I c. That is what happened, so Justin Barker did not go to Jena High School, and the fight didn't happen in the high school but instead, some 'brothas' just seen Justin walking down the street and said "lets go kick this honky's ass??!" Wow, if black people only knew the facts as clearly as you do, I am sure they would have stop protesting a long time ago. You see, we were under the impression that it went down just a little difference. But once again, you know how we are, we were wrong.
(Galaron), i slept on your comments. I am trying to refrain from getting rude with you. So instead of accusing you of being stupid, I will just ask you to watch at least one of the videos on the Jena 6 before you make comments about a case you obviously know nothing about. If I may suggest the ESPN OTL Jena 6 (do a search), it seems to be pretty fair reporting and they attempt to show both sides of the issue. But your reasoning makes about as much sense as 1+2= 8 . Ignorance is inexcusable.
If its inexcusable how do you live with yourself. I have watched the videos. The black kid requesting to sit under the tree knew it would cause trouble. Otherwise he wouldnt have asked to sit under that specific tree. If you were black would you ask to go hang out with the kkk?
Hey man, look in the mirror and say to yourself, "it is not even cool to be his ignorant". Jim Crow is over, and it is not coming back. So if u think their should be "white" only bathrooms, seats on the bus, water fountains, and trees. Than, I have nothing more to say to you because it is obvious that u are stuck on stupid. Your brain capacity is that of a earth worm, and it is nothing more I can do for u.
I like how you avoid my statement. No i dont believe thier should be white only bathrooms But you cant deny the obviouse. There are places you just dont go without causing issues. I feel your too ignorant about todays society
Get the fuck off there al sharpton. But he's right. Lets round up the 6 white boys that jumped the 1 black guy. Oh wait that didnt happen. Rot in jail bitches.
(jbernethysr) Nobody would have said anything if there was equal justice, this is a case of unequal justice. A report went out on CNN yesterday that said their are more black & latinos in jail cells than college dorm rooms, race does play a part in that equation and that is an important issue to some americans.
There comes a time when the person that does the crime.Does his time. Not black or white. Just a person or persons that hurt another person.Pays the price. Why do we always make it a race thing?
it is a race thing because never in history, HISTORY of american justice has somebody been charged for attempted murder after a school fight where there was no weapon used, and there was no long term hospitalization. That is why it is a race thing. Now if there was equal justice, meaning the boys that jumped the black kid were charged, the victim who, brought a shotgun to school was charged with a crime. Then it would just be a case of tough justice.
That's horrible logic. Justice isnt determined by playing tit for tat. Each case has to be weighted and examined individually.
Fights in school are normal, and this factor I am sure was weighed in but an unconscience person seems to be where they draw the line of criminal action.
The American Justice system is based on case law or precedents. If you can show me any precedent for a juvenille being charged with ATTEMPTED MURDER for a fight, whether the 'so-called victim' was unconcious or not, than I would say that your rebuttal makes sense. Otherwise, it is not tit for tat, but what it is is a malicious prosecution.
(cont) if we follow Precedents, or Case Law, than, the Duke D.A (Nifong) was charged with malicious prosecution for witholding evidence. I think CRUEL & UNUSUAL punishment is what this would be called. Not only were no witnesses called for the defendant, it was an all white jury, and the charges have no precedent. Nobody has ever been charged for attempted murder for using a tennis shoe to stump somebody out. NEVER. So you can make all of the excuses you want.
Under this logic, nothing new can be tried unless it has happened before. The very first person who commited internet theft couldnt be tried for anything because it hasnt happened before. Laws are not static. Societies change. Values change. Youre comparing apples and oranges.
(spectre: under this logic...) just the opposite. School fights have happened many times. This is not a new event. Attempted murder is not a new charge like internet fraud? The old cliche of "your comparing apples to oranges" doesn't work here.
I am stating facts. You don't charge a juvenille with attempted murder, unless you actually can substantiate that. Justin Barker had a black eye and got knocked out. Battery maybe. There is no value that has changed that permits us throwing the futures of our kids away over personal vendettas. Our society hasn't changed to allow that. jurisprudence is like a checks and balances system that guaruntees equal justice for all.
To be honest. I don't think Mychal Bell is any more guilty than an abused wife who after going to the authorities many times, to no avail, has taken a weapon and defended herself. The authorities are guilty of negligence for not handling this situation right from the beginning. If they had not turned a blind eye on their sons, than the situation may not have went this far. But i guess that would be 'apples to oranges' or something like that.
Our justice system is based on moral relevancy. Now it does use case law to establish jurisprudence but this in no way is used to establish guilt or innocence. Regardless, we can not establish whether justice is being served until we establish guilt. So far no one has been found guilty of anything.
Mychal Bell was found guilty in court while being represented by a public defender. He was charged. If we going by 'moral relevancy' a phrase i doubt i will find in any law book, we can ask ourselves, would it have been morally relevant to charge a kid who brings a weapon to school with a crime?
Or is it just morally relevant to charge some kids who did not use any weapon with attempted murder. Do u remember Columbine, VTech and all the other countless school shootings. I think nothing is more 'morally relevant' than making sure weapons (not tennis shoes) are not brought into schools.
What you are doing is arguing that the accusation is absurd, but the Prosecuting Att. has every right to charge him with whatever he feels serves the interest of the law. If what you feel is true, that this accusation is absurd, then the jury should come to the same conclusion. Justice is established in the verdict not the accusation.
That may apply to adults. But you do not try a juvenille as an adult. That would be the difference there. In that case, we can try kids as adults for all sorts of mischief. Would that serve the greater interest. A jury of your peers would also be relevant here, and a judge would step in and call a mistrial on an incompetent defense.
The District Attorney is a public trust, a voted office. He suppose to represent the people, not his personal vendetta. The accusation is absurd, we are talking about minors, 16 year old kid. NOBODY has the right to throw away their futures over charges that don't stick. Now if Mychal Bell had brought a gun to school, shot Justin. Then you would have an argument.
but to argue that the D.A has the right to charge people how he sees fit and not how the law deems necessary is giving unfair powers to the prosecution. The accusation determines the bond, influences the jury, and determines the amount that a defense lawyer will charge to defend that case. it is very relevant.
I agree with you completely. He has every right to appeal this process if he feels he was treated unfairly. This is where I think you should focus your energy.
Remember, the more absurd the accusation and the carrying out of justice, the easier it is to overturn a case when exposed to the public. This is why most courts follow the rules as closely as possible so that their cases do not get overturned.
Moral relevancy is the cornerstone of modern law as opposed to moral absolutism. You should look it up.
Moral relevancy doesnt decide whether bringing a weapon to school is criminal, (law makers do)but rather it weighs in all of the facts surrounding the event and applies a punishment that fits the crime if found guilty.
i agree that ALL criminals who commit crimes based on RACE should be made an example of and charged to the fullest extent of the law including HATE crime charges. These criminals should spend long periods of times in jail.
This includes 6 black athaletes who assault and batter 1 white nonathalete. Hate crimes are hate crimes, whether committed against whites, blacks, purples, or reds.
(folio)Do you think that Justin Barker was beat up because he was white? Or do you think he was attacked because he was provoking someone. It is weird to say the least that the only prosecution witness was one of the kids that hung the neuses. If that is the one person who stood up for Justin, I could easily make the assumption that they were two of the same kind.
I don't think this was a case of athletes vs. non-athletes. I would guess that it was a case of a racist getting his ass kicked, but again i am assuming. I think that "the chickens came home to roost"
what does it take to make people realize what could happen. would you risk hundred of lives for the sake of 6 kids freedom? i want you to really think about that question. Is harm and possible murder worth 6 kids freedom? that is the question i want you to ask yourselves. that one question. Is it worth it? let me hear from you! the good and bad
(sweet)definitely worth it, and I think they can find some other place to be safe besides jail. They are not some sacrificial lambs that we should let go to jail for fear of white racist backlash. Who cares about the racist? We should not let a D.A make good on his threats, threats that should have him disbarred to begin with. It is called malicious prosecution. He should be the one to go to jail.
maybe we can deduct a time line from what happened in LA. Race crimes bring hate and violence to the table. i worry for thoughs kids if they don't get charged. LA riots were the same thing only in reverse. bunch of white cops and one black man. cops went free and hell broke lose.
ok reality check time! you know why i would rather see though's kids in jail? cause i think they may just be a bit safer there.If they all get off in such a racist town. How long before they get lynched do you think? we all know this still happens today in this time. so give me a time line? i mean if the la riots were any clue. maybe we will know.
this can happen to any black....if you don't stand for something you can fall for anything...i live pretty close to jena and as a black that lives in louisiana...just the south peroid i know that times change people don't
your done arguing because you have nothing more to add. your reasoning is elementary, and your arguments have no validity. When pointed out the facts, like hanging a neuse from a tree is a crime, just like hanging a neuse from a vehicle. Like bringing a shotgun to school, like pulling out a shotgun on a student. Those are CRIMES, in most places, and for most Americans. Of course, the law seems to change in SOME places for SOME people.
They actually used their tennis shoes on this kid. He never shot anyone... You're just being dumb and you have no clue how the law works. I understand you're mad because this kid is in jail and he happens to be an African American, but that gives you no right to change the subject and blame the beating of this kid on other people
If it is unloaded in his vehicle it is not illegal. If it were, there should be about 50 million students in jail... As long as he doesn't take it out of the case it is legal. It's called the right to bear arms. It's in the constitution... People just assume it's illegal after all of the school shootings recently
It was unloaded... Once again. LEGAL... I don't believe a shotgun was actually taken out of a case and pointed at someone. I guess I could be wrong. Show me the story from a reputable source and I'll agree with you
It is as if people did not see the special, like they did not hear the facts. Why are these statements even being made. Why is he still in jail? Why is Justin Barker not in jail, why is the one witness that the prosecution called one of the kids that hung a neuse on the tree? This is what should be asked. How can we get the Bar Association to disbar the D.A.? How can we get Kathleen Blanco to intervene?
(GDP) (Cont..) The same kid, Justin Barker, brought a shotgun to school a few weeks after the incident. I thought bringing a gun to school in light of Columbine, VTech, and all of these other school shootings, was supposed to be prosecuted. I guess that law just applies to some people or when it is convenient.
Didn't the kid they beat up almost die? Why are we supposed to feel sorry for the guys who beat the shit out of him? I don't understand... And I don't care what race they are. If 6 people beat the shit out of 1 kid, they should go to jail.
(GDP) (Cont. pt. 3) Again, we have a person who wants to make one person to be a victim, who happens to be white. How about the white students that jumped the black student, or the white student that pulled the shotgun out on the black students, or the kids that hung the neuses from the tree? When do you start asking for them to "go to jail"????
What do you mean what do I mean? I said , we wiped out all, the Indians, got rid of that problem, theyre not scalping us anymore, and now we got too many damn criminal niggers in this country, who, when they do commit a crime, all the blacks want them to get away with it.
use your head lavernejazz! if the tree has been a "cause" for so many problems then remove one problem. one issue is that the tree is called "the white tree" used for whites only. now removing an issue like that could be a good start to working towards a starting solution. DUH!!!!
Everyone has solutions!!RIGHT?? What you should be doing is Thanking Blacktreemedia for the report..People what is wrong with you?? Open up your hearts..Go to your own blog pages if you want to negate the Cause........this is NOT the stage for your ignorance...
If the thousands who demonstrated were so concerned about the "Jena Six," how come they left the "Jena Six" still in jail? How come these concerned demonstrators did not raise the bail money for the "Jena Six?"
(HearTheTruth) only one is in jail, and he does not have bail, if you were so smart you would've known that before you made your comment. If there was a bail, you should've contributed your money just like all of the protesters to getting him out. You are American right? You do believe in the constitution right?
blacktreemedia just told you... only one is locked up because he got an attempted murder charge. He is up for 22 years. there is not bail for a conviction
let me think.... about nothing... cause i say if you do the crime ... you do the time. i don't agree with thoughs kids being free. regardless of their color.
now i am all for a fair trial. thats all good by me.but don't rally around guilty kids. go after thoughs cases that went bad. retry thoughs cases and rally around a cause for fair justice in that.
now see this is wrong. sharpton is a good guy and all but you know what. by being there, it is saying that it's ok for a group of black kids to beat up one white kid and get off scot free. he wants that kid out of jail and back in school because what? because years of injustice has wronged them? don't defend guilt people.
All parties were guilty of fighting....that is not up for debate. But the injustice occurs when once again, black people are given outrageous penalties compared to whites. The white kids that hung the noose on the tree should be charged with a federal offense, as this is a hate crime. Since when did fighting in school = criminal charges??
i understand that... but like i said... don't defend them. fight the wrongs that occured with thoughs cases he is using as an excuse to get these kid off this attempted murder rap. i said i am all for equal justice. but nat at the expense of guilty people running free.
"The white kids that hung the noose on the tree should be charged with a federal offense, as this is a hate crime."
========================
What's next? Federal crimes for toilet papering a tree? Any insult is an excuse to get violent? Get a real preacher, go read a bible, learn to properly deal with it. If a white someone yells "Ni..er" does that give someone a "right" to get violent? What if a black someone yells "H-nky"? Justify that too?
The black students did not choose to get violent.They staged a sit in under the tree. Which was the reason 4 the district attorney to say,"I can end your life with the stroke of this pen".Now who do you think he was talking to?Racism is alive today and if you cant c it. It is because you my friend are to a racist
All I think he was saying is blacks are still not treated equally. If it would have been the other way around the white children's parents would have gotton the best lawyers and they would have still gotton off scott free. I also heard that some of the jury were kin to the white children. Now im not trying to say what the black children did was right because it wasn't. But that still doesn't give the white kids the right to go around and tie nooses to a tree. They to should have been punished.
well think about it this way.... how many riots would occur in the black community to get an attempted murder charge on the white kids if they had beaten a black kid near to death. they would have been fighting the same fight as the whites are now. they are just using this as a reason to rally. so you see the white rally groups there protesting? no. they said they did not want to envoke an already harsh situation
(Sweetmystify) at any expense, the kid was not beaten to death if he could go to a function later that night. Suspension, maybe expulsion, but criminal charges at all would be a stretch in my eyes. Especially when 'terroristic threats' are looked on as a prank. Justin Baker brought a shotgun to school some weeks later and was expelled, so I don't think he is the 'innocent' victim here either.
I didn't put words into your mouth. I made a statement. You had left out his guilt in all of this, and pointed out the group that was charged with beating him up. I was just pointing out, that even after this 'crime' had occured, Justin Baker brought a shotgun to school, and wasn't charged with anything, but just expelled from school. So I think bringing a shotgun to school should be a crime if beating somebody up with your bear hands is a crime. I mean, fair is fair, right?
Sweetmystify31 What do you mean scott free? Bell is still in jail and has been for sometime now.What about the growin men that attack Bell at the party. Or what about the kid that had a sawed off shout gun which is illegal by the way.IF you dont see the injustic here than you are a racist and I dont care how many black friends you have.
al sharpton is a fucking nigger hes why white people are racist
Motocrossking407 7 months ago
racism will always exist a long as this nigga is still alive...a liar and these people are being decieved by Satan thru this man
splintercellsam33 11 months ago 2
Al Sharpton believes that a vote for Obama was a vote for socialism. watch?v=KCpINI5aVy0 Al Sharpton wants to share the wealth. “Al Sharpton: We Won't Have True Social Justice Until Everything is Equal in Everybody's House” watch?v=95bcEb1rV18
.
Sharpton should start by giving up his $5 million (from celebrity net worth com) It’s also worth noting Hilter was a socialist that seemed to follow the Communist Manifesto.
.
Allen West 2012
TheModelification 1 year ago
REEEEEEEPINGA.............
FetodeOrca 1 year ago
Racist pig AL SHarpton - smeared feces on Tiwana Browley and accused white cops of doing so.
Incited and caused the premedited murder of Yankel Rosenbaum.
Incited and caused the premedited murder of 7 ppl at Freddie's Fashion Mart.
And the list goes on.
The media calls this subhuman Nazi roach a "civil rights activist" and "reverend", while Limbaugh, Savage and Buchanan are labelled "extremists".
Where was the media when Newsom & Christian were savagely murdered?
Wake up Americans!
OlUncleJoe 2 years ago 3
the hangman's noose has always been a halloween prop........a universal symbol of death..............imho.
"the hangman's noose was never a symbol of racism until al sharpton said it was during the jena 6 circus."
does anybody else agree with this statement?
johnnycoonass 2 years ago 5
sharpton is a cunny swigger
sandelpop 2 years ago
I do,I am agree with you my friend,and agree for 100%,see?,that "Al sharpton is a big demagogue,.....greetings and good luck,take care...
FetodeOrca 1 year ago
Screw the Jena 6! Those vermin deserve to rot in jail! Al Sharpton is a cockroach!!!
MrNorth87 2 years ago
look up "the knoxville massacre" al said that was not racist also.....
digzie1 2 years ago
MR. you are so right.. and i thank and i totally agree with you.. thanks
lmercado9999 2 years ago
some one seriously needs to off that dumbass. All he does is bitch about everything. Blacks wanted equal rights and now they want everyone to kiss theyre ass. Its only a matter of time before the white man gets pissed about shit like this
kense69 2 years ago 2
Number #1,equal rights was never yours to give us . #2 You are not white, you are caucasion . #3 As far as getting pissed, it will only be because you want things back the way they use to be. Now i wasnt sold on Jena 6 at all . People have to start taking responsibility for their actions. Someone should have displayed some type of diplomacy .
OpertonPerspective 2 years ago
If it was six white kids beating a black kid they would be in jail and shitloads of whites would demand it. Brainwashed by media for years whites always call other whites racist at the drop of a pin. Paving the way for douchebags like Sharpton and Jackson to gain control. Wake up white people!!!
Rewipeslideass 2 years ago 5
Al Sharpton fails to mention that if it were the other way around we would want the white kids to rot in jail.
tgrfan42069 2 years ago 5
Maybe ya'll should have a reason to march or protest before you raise hell.
Banjopicker21 3 years ago 6
So Mr. Bell shouldn't be sitting in jail? Hmmm....I have a solution, why not stop violently beating white people up? Then you wouldn't be in jail! See? Problem solved!
drexelur1 3 years ago 6
It makes my day to see Al Sharpton make all you white people mad. I love the comments but you are the same people who wont say that shit to a Collard Green eating Niggers face lol. I cant wait until Obama is president.
MYIZ33 3 years ago
al sharpton is an embarassment and a hinderance to black people's progress....he wants u to use the victimology mentality...he's an ASSHOLE and so r u, by the way obama is who he is because he was educated and raised by white people. dummy.
redsmooch989 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Black Panthers weren't about starting violence ignorant people, maybe you should read something on the Panthers before placing stupid comments on here.
Kudback27 3 years ago
"Black Panthers weren't about starting violence ignorant people"
Funny. That's the exact same thing KKK supporters say.
tobiasrobbins72 2 years ago 2
Sharpton is only about starting violence - Black Panther?
firewallx 3 years ago 6
HAHA! This mollie got arrested. I hope this black radical racist, in the closet Black Panther gets run over next time he decides to block traffic in NYC for a criminal Sean Bell. FUCK Sharpton he's a nappy headed hoe.
cartmanfan0316 3 years ago 7
Shut your collard greens eating mouth..Nigger~
vangelis721 3 years ago 8
you never see this guy when somthing happens to a white person, so he's racists,
your hypocrits.. yall think your the best.
mean while your nothing
praise Jesus.
Suraci87 3 years ago 4
al sharpton wants to talk about racism?? LMFAO he is one of the most racist people I have seen...fuck him
germanpride19 3 years ago 7
al sharpton racist asshole who makes money on dividing people.
nyfinest25 4 years ago 7
The Jena situation not withstanding,Al Sharpton should not be a mouthpiece for anyone or any cause until he acknowledges that the Tawana Brawley rape charges were a hoax and he apologies for calling a white business owner in Harlem,"A White Interloper". Until then,he has no credibility.
delboy426 4 years ago
fuck al sharpton!!!fuck al sharpton!!!! fuck al sharpton!!!! -cant we all get along without this DIPSHIT-fuck al sharpton!!!!-fuck al sharptin!!!!-fuck al sharpton!!
peaceupondeath 4 years ago
support the Jena Criminals!
eeuumuscle 4 years ago
(eeuumuscle) which ones?; The kids that hung the nooses on the tree, the kid that hit Purvis on the head with a bottle and jumped him, or Justin Barker who brought a Shotgun to school and was not charged. Or the D.A, for Malicious Prosecution? Which criminals in Jena are you referring to?
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
Barker WAS arrested AND expelled for bringing a gun to school (which was in his truck, NOT used to threaten anyone). There is not only ZERO evidence of Bailey being hit with a bottle, the evidence STRONGLY supports the claim that he made that up many weeks later. Mr. Washington has explained why he didn't prosecute the noosehangers. Get some facts Black Tree. Seriously. Go read about Bryant Purvis' latest violent assault or something if checking your facts is too much to ask.
TechsasT 4 years ago
(techas) Barker was arrested and NEVER charged. Is that research enough 4 u. Obviously the noosehangers (terrorist) were not only never charged, but their expulsions were overturned. How does a victims claim equal zero evidence? Because it is not in te police report does not mean that it didn't happen. Was Bryant Purvis charged with attempted murder in his 'latest violent assault'? If not, I don't know how that changes the argument one bit.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
Oh also blacktreemedia a school yard fight is one on one not six on one
keni203 4 years ago
(keni) and attempted murder is when somebody is actually had an attempt on their life, not when they get discharged from the hospital in 3 hours and go to a school banquet later that night. Most people would just say, "he got knocked the f$%k out", doesn't make it right, but it damn sure doesn't mean you charge some kids w/ attempted murder. Reeboks have never been classified as a murder weapon, until this case. Justin Barker brought a shotgun to school, now that is a murder weapon.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
The problem in society is that people look up to people like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and when they and people like you say it's okay to have 6 kids beat up another kid black or white and get a concussion and left for dead which you "conveniently" left out who are you to say it's not attempted murder?Thank God Barack Obama said it was wrong but then he was called by Jesse Jackson as trying to act white who has the real problem??????
keni203 4 years ago 2
I vehemently agree. People got behing the civil rights movement when it was led by Martin Luther King because he actually wanted blacks and whites to leave together, while now Jackson and Sharpton insist on playing the "race card" and alienating anyone who is not black.
CountArtha 4 years ago
Typo there...he wanted blacks and whites to LIVE together. My mistake.
CountArtha 4 years ago
(Keni) Simple question, if you were in a car accident, and left 'half dead', would you be discharged from the hospital in 2.5 hours? If you were, would you go to a school party later that evening? Don't put Barack in this, because he also said it was wrong to charge those juveniles as an adult, for a school yard fight. So thank God for sensibility.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
blacktreemedia what you don't understand is that in life nothing is exact when a kid is beaten you never know what could happen he "could" have been killed this kid doesn't need 6 kids pissed off over a noose risking his life in any way and they need to be punished luckily he was able to go to a school party but anything could have happened in the beating and that is why the beating should not be condoned. That is what is sensible so try again. Nice try though.
keni203 4 years ago
He didn't go to any "party" anyway. He went to a ring ceremony, was allowed to go up first, was helped on and off stage, was applauded for his strength and went home. But you made real good points keni.
RamblingRickyRhodes 4 years ago
hahah you lying coon.
The truth about Jena is coming out and you sick bastards defending these animals for attacking a random kid 6 on 1 re being shown up for what you are.
ebeneezzer 4 years ago
I know the video and the case. you might want to do your research. The black guy later admited that him and his friend instigated the fight earlier that night because one of the guys knows the white girl. and he was the one who threw the beer botle. thats why they were jumped. Is this all you have to offer. Sumb dumb ass trying to get another free ride in life. GTFO
Galaron28 4 years ago
so if Justin Barker instigated the fight, than the Jena 6 would be justified in fighting him, 6 on 1, if that is indeed what happened? Because it sounds like you are saying that the group of 6 white guys were justified because he instigated the fight? Is that what u are saying?
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
No the guy walked into the mcdonalds with the beer bottle and threw it at them. The white guy beat up by the jena six was in the wrong place at the wrong time. If the white guys jumped on him for no reason then i say throw thier asses in jail as well.
Galaron28 4 years ago
So if Justin Barker did instigate the fight, than you would say that the Jena 6 were justified in stumping him out? 6 on 1?
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
Hey guy. Dont be stupid. you know how friends are. you start fighting in the heat of the moment your friends will jump in. Dont go off subject. what they did was wrong and its time for them to pay for it. Enough said
Galaron28 4 years ago
(Galaron) I don't know how I am being stupid, or how this is not on the same subject. If you are justifying 'how in the heat of the moment your friends will jump in' and we are discussing a 1-on-6 fight. And you say that the white men were justified because they were provoked, I can not help but to draw a correlation between the two cases.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
It has been said that Justin Barker provoked Bell and others. But, maybe it should be different for the 6 white guys, or maybe the 6 white guys should've been charged with attempted murder? Who am i to say? I am sorry if I offended you my friend, I was just asking a question. I was hoping you can help me understand your opinion better.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
meaning the jenna 6 went looking for the white guy with the soul person of fighting him. the 6 white guys that jumped on the black guy were basicly fighting in self defence. ill admit it shouldnt have been 6 on 2. But like i said in the heat of the moment they were not gonna stop to decide who should be fighting
Galaron28 4 years ago
So when 6 white guys fight one black guy, it is 'self defense', but when a white kid is knocked out for provocation, it is pre-meditated and attempted murder. Okay, I understand perfectly clear now. You are right, it is two totally different circumstances.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
wtf?? i didnt say that. The guy came in and threw a fucking beer bottle at them. So in turn he got his black ass kicked. with the jenna 6 the kid is walking down the road and one of the brothas go. he theres that honky lets go kick the shit out of him. Thats the damn difference. Jeez man noone is that fucking retarded.
Galaron28 4 years ago
Oh I c. That is what happened, so Justin Barker did not go to Jena High School, and the fight didn't happen in the high school but instead, some 'brothas' just seen Justin walking down the street and said "lets go kick this honky's ass??!" Wow, if black people only knew the facts as clearly as you do, I am sure they would have stop protesting a long time ago. You see, we were under the impression that it went down just a little difference. But once again, you know how we are, we were wrong.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
please excuse my ignorance.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
im glad you finally get it.
Galaron28 4 years ago
(Galaron), i slept on your comments. I am trying to refrain from getting rude with you. So instead of accusing you of being stupid, I will just ask you to watch at least one of the videos on the Jena 6 before you make comments about a case you obviously know nothing about. If I may suggest the ESPN OTL Jena 6 (do a search), it seems to be pretty fair reporting and they attempt to show both sides of the issue. But your reasoning makes about as much sense as 1+2= 8 . Ignorance is inexcusable.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
If its inexcusable how do you live with yourself. I have watched the videos. The black kid requesting to sit under the tree knew it would cause trouble. Otherwise he wouldnt have asked to sit under that specific tree. If you were black would you ask to go hang out with the kkk?
Galaron28 4 years ago
Hey man, look in the mirror and say to yourself, "it is not even cool to be his ignorant". Jim Crow is over, and it is not coming back. So if u think their should be "white" only bathrooms, seats on the bus, water fountains, and trees. Than, I have nothing more to say to you because it is obvious that u are stuck on stupid. Your brain capacity is that of a earth worm, and it is nothing more I can do for u.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
I like how you avoid my statement. No i dont believe thier should be white only bathrooms But you cant deny the obviouse. There are places you just dont go without causing issues. I feel your too ignorant about todays society
Galaron28 4 years ago
Get the fuck off there al sharpton. But he's right. Lets round up the 6 white boys that jumped the 1 black guy. Oh wait that didnt happen. Rot in jail bitches.
Galaron28 4 years ago
Al Sharpton is a piece of shit. He wants immunity rather than equality. Slavery ended 100 years ago, get over yourselves.
DirtyWhiteBoy616 4 years ago
bitch please slavery still go on u ragedy piece of shit
Yazmyn66 4 years ago
yeah its called lack of proper grammer you idiotic fuck
Galaron28 4 years ago
(jbernethysr) Nobody would have said anything if there was equal justice, this is a case of unequal justice. A report went out on CNN yesterday that said their are more black & latinos in jail cells than college dorm rooms, race does play a part in that equation and that is an important issue to some americans.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
There comes a time when the person that does the crime.Does his time. Not black or white. Just a person or persons that hurt another person.Pays the price. Why do we always make it a race thing?
jbernethysr 4 years ago
it is a race thing because never in history, HISTORY of american justice has somebody been charged for attempted murder after a school fight where there was no weapon used, and there was no long term hospitalization. That is why it is a race thing. Now if there was equal justice, meaning the boys that jumped the black kid were charged, the victim who, brought a shotgun to school was charged with a crime. Then it would just be a case of tough justice.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
That's horrible logic. Justice isnt determined by playing tit for tat. Each case has to be weighted and examined individually.
Fights in school are normal, and this factor I am sure was weighed in but an unconscience person seems to be where they draw the line of criminal action.
Spectre11B 4 years ago
The American Justice system is based on case law or precedents. If you can show me any precedent for a juvenille being charged with ATTEMPTED MURDER for a fight, whether the 'so-called victim' was unconcious or not, than I would say that your rebuttal makes sense. Otherwise, it is not tit for tat, but what it is is a malicious prosecution.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
(cont) if we follow Precedents, or Case Law, than, the Duke D.A (Nifong) was charged with malicious prosecution for witholding evidence. I think CRUEL & UNUSUAL punishment is what this would be called. Not only were no witnesses called for the defendant, it was an all white jury, and the charges have no precedent. Nobody has ever been charged for attempted murder for using a tennis shoe to stump somebody out. NEVER. So you can make all of the excuses you want.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
Under this logic, nothing new can be tried unless it has happened before. The very first person who commited internet theft couldnt be tried for anything because it hasnt happened before. Laws are not static. Societies change. Values change. Youre comparing apples and oranges.
Spectre11B 4 years ago
(spectre: under this logic...) just the opposite. School fights have happened many times. This is not a new event. Attempted murder is not a new charge like internet fraud? The old cliche of "your comparing apples to oranges" doesn't work here.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
I am stating facts. You don't charge a juvenille with attempted murder, unless you actually can substantiate that. Justin Barker had a black eye and got knocked out. Battery maybe. There is no value that has changed that permits us throwing the futures of our kids away over personal vendettas. Our society hasn't changed to allow that. jurisprudence is like a checks and balances system that guaruntees equal justice for all.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
To be honest. I don't think Mychal Bell is any more guilty than an abused wife who after going to the authorities many times, to no avail, has taken a weapon and defended herself. The authorities are guilty of negligence for not handling this situation right from the beginning. If they had not turned a blind eye on their sons, than the situation may not have went this far. But i guess that would be 'apples to oranges' or something like that.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
Our justice system is based on moral relevancy. Now it does use case law to establish jurisprudence but this in no way is used to establish guilt or innocence. Regardless, we can not establish whether justice is being served until we establish guilt. So far no one has been found guilty of anything.
Spectre11B 4 years ago
Mychal Bell was found guilty in court while being represented by a public defender. He was charged. If we going by 'moral relevancy' a phrase i doubt i will find in any law book, we can ask ourselves, would it have been morally relevant to charge a kid who brings a weapon to school with a crime?
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
Or is it just morally relevant to charge some kids who did not use any weapon with attempted murder. Do u remember Columbine, VTech and all the other countless school shootings. I think nothing is more 'morally relevant' than making sure weapons (not tennis shoes) are not brought into schools.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
What you are doing is arguing that the accusation is absurd, but the Prosecuting Att. has every right to charge him with whatever he feels serves the interest of the law. If what you feel is true, that this accusation is absurd, then the jury should come to the same conclusion. Justice is established in the verdict not the accusation.
Spectre11B 4 years ago
That may apply to adults. But you do not try a juvenille as an adult. That would be the difference there. In that case, we can try kids as adults for all sorts of mischief. Would that serve the greater interest. A jury of your peers would also be relevant here, and a judge would step in and call a mistrial on an incompetent defense.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
The District Attorney is a public trust, a voted office. He suppose to represent the people, not his personal vendetta. The accusation is absurd, we are talking about minors, 16 year old kid. NOBODY has the right to throw away their futures over charges that don't stick. Now if Mychal Bell had brought a gun to school, shot Justin. Then you would have an argument.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
but to argue that the D.A has the right to charge people how he sees fit and not how the law deems necessary is giving unfair powers to the prosecution. The accusation determines the bond, influences the jury, and determines the amount that a defense lawyer will charge to defend that case. it is very relevant.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
I agree with you completely. He has every right to appeal this process if he feels he was treated unfairly. This is where I think you should focus your energy.
Remember, the more absurd the accusation and the carrying out of justice, the easier it is to overturn a case when exposed to the public. This is why most courts follow the rules as closely as possible so that their cases do not get overturned.
Spectre11B 4 years ago
Moral relevancy is the cornerstone of modern law as opposed to moral absolutism. You should look it up.
Moral relevancy doesnt decide whether bringing a weapon to school is criminal, (law makers do)but rather it weighs in all of the facts surrounding the event and applies a punishment that fits the crime if found guilty.
Spectre11B 4 years ago
i agree that ALL criminals who commit crimes based on RACE should be made an example of and charged to the fullest extent of the law including HATE crime charges. These criminals should spend long periods of times in jail.
This includes 6 black athaletes who assault and batter 1 white nonathalete. Hate crimes are hate crimes, whether committed against whites, blacks, purples, or reds.
foliodell 4 years ago
(folio)Do you think that Justin Barker was beat up because he was white? Or do you think he was attacked because he was provoking someone. It is weird to say the least that the only prosecution witness was one of the kids that hung the neuses. If that is the one person who stood up for Justin, I could easily make the assumption that they were two of the same kind.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
I don't think this was a case of athletes vs. non-athletes. I would guess that it was a case of a racist getting his ass kicked, but again i am assuming. I think that "the chickens came home to roost"
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
Nooses are reminiscent of Lynchings which involved the PUBLIC DISMEMBERMENT of Black
women and children who screamed as their body parts were thrown to angry white mobs who fought over souveniers! "Nigger Burned Alive"
was often the headlines in towns all across America! Free the Jena 6 !!!!!!!!!!
xXTheWagesOfSinXx 4 years ago
reality check final-
what does it take to make people realize what could happen. would you risk hundred of lives for the sake of 6 kids freedom? i want you to really think about that question. Is harm and possible murder worth 6 kids freedom? that is the question i want you to ask yourselves. that one question. Is it worth it? let me hear from you! the good and bad
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
(sweet)definitely worth it, and I think they can find some other place to be safe besides jail. They are not some sacrificial lambs that we should let go to jail for fear of white racist backlash. Who cares about the racist? We should not let a D.A make good on his threats, threats that should have him disbarred to begin with. It is called malicious prosecution. He should be the one to go to jail.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
part 2 reality check-
maybe we can deduct a time line from what happened in LA. Race crimes bring hate and violence to the table. i worry for thoughs kids if they don't get charged. LA riots were the same thing only in reverse. bunch of white cops and one black man. cops went free and hell broke lose.
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
ok reality check time! you know why i would rather see though's kids in jail? cause i think they may just be a bit safer there.If they all get off in such a racist town. How long before they get lynched do you think? we all know this still happens today in this time. so give me a time line? i mean if the la riots were any clue. maybe we will know.
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
What was Mychal Bell sentenced
TrueSlayer20 4 years ago
this can happen to any black....if you don't stand for something you can fall for anything...i live pretty close to jena and as a black that lives in louisiana...just the south peroid i know that times change people don't
lilredbone1 4 years ago
black justice is different look at kc corruption unleashed
puppydog45 4 years ago
reverend do politic?
fucking nasty work!
kresnanto 4 years ago
Black will always be black! These people needs to get a life!
ViaVoice2006 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you need to get a fuckin life!
CAPPITANOI 4 years ago
your done arguing because you have nothing more to add. your reasoning is elementary, and your arguments have no validity. When pointed out the facts, like hanging a neuse from a tree is a crime, just like hanging a neuse from a vehicle. Like bringing a shotgun to school, like pulling out a shotgun on a student. Those are CRIMES, in most places, and for most Americans. Of course, the law seems to change in SOME places for SOME people.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
I'm done arguing about this since you have no idea what you are talking about... Have fun arguing with yourself
GDP2003 4 years ago
It IS legal to have an unloaded firearm in the trunk of your car in a school parking lot... Look it up
GDP2003 4 years ago
America... Love it or leave it
GDP2003 4 years ago
been there & loved leaving it.its a shithole
znotty 4 years ago
They actually used their tennis shoes on this kid. He never shot anyone... You're just being dumb and you have no clue how the law works. I understand you're mad because this kid is in jail and he happens to be an African American, but that gives you no right to change the subject and blame the beating of this kid on other people
GDP2003 4 years ago
If it is unloaded in his vehicle it is not illegal. If it were, there should be about 50 million students in jail... As long as he doesn't take it out of the case it is legal. It's called the right to bear arms. It's in the constitution... People just assume it's illegal after all of the school shootings recently
GDP2003 4 years ago
by the way, their tennis shoes were 'unloaded' also
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
It was unloaded... Once again. LEGAL... I don't believe a shotgun was actually taken out of a case and pointed at someone. I guess I could be wrong. Show me the story from a reputable source and I'll agree with you
GDP2003 4 years ago
It is as if people did not see the special, like they did not hear the facts. Why are these statements even being made. Why is he still in jail? Why is Justin Barker not in jail, why is the one witness that the prosecution called one of the kids that hung a neuse on the tree? This is what should be asked. How can we get the Bar Association to disbar the D.A.? How can we get Kathleen Blanco to intervene?
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
(GDP) (Cont..) The same kid, Justin Barker, brought a shotgun to school a few weeks after the incident. I thought bringing a gun to school in light of Columbine, VTech, and all of these other school shootings, was supposed to be prosecuted. I guess that law just applies to some people or when it is convenient.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
Didn't the kid they beat up almost die? Why are we supposed to feel sorry for the guys who beat the shit out of him? I don't understand... And I don't care what race they are. If 6 people beat the shit out of 1 kid, they should go to jail.
GDP2003 4 years ago
(GDP) (Cont. pt. 3) Again, we have a person who wants to make one person to be a victim, who happens to be white. How about the white students that jumped the black student, or the white student that pulled the shotgun out on the black students, or the kids that hung the neuses from the tree? When do you start asking for them to "go to jail"????
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
Hanging a neuse from a tree isn't a crime... Kicking the shit out of someone for no reason is however
GDP2003 4 years ago
Damn!!! We went to all the trouble of wiping out the Indians, and now we got a country full of niggers. DAMN!!!
hannityforpres 4 years ago
what the hell do you mean?
Deonteya 4 years ago
What do you mean what do I mean? I said , we wiped out all, the Indians, got rid of that problem, theyre not scalping us anymore, and now we got too many damn criminal niggers in this country, who, when they do commit a crime, all the blacks want them to get away with it.
hannityforpres 4 years ago
Then you may want to contact the news media to make a correct. Because the news media is reporting he is still in jail because he has a $90,000 bond.
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
The tree didnt do anything..Just provided shade..I guess now its what the tree will mean to people of Jena, NOW!!
lavernejazz 4 years ago
use your head lavernejazz! if the tree has been a "cause" for so many problems then remove one problem. one issue is that the tree is called "the white tree" used for whites only. now removing an issue like that could be a good start to working towards a starting solution. DUH!!!!
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
Everyone has solutions!!RIGHT?? What you should be doing is Thanking Blacktreemedia for the report..People what is wrong with you?? Open up your hearts..Go to your own blog pages if you want to negate the Cause........this is NOT the stage for your ignorance...
lavernejazz 4 years ago
The should start by chopping down the tree!!!
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
you were reading the part i said i am all for equal justice right?
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
If the thousands who demonstrated were so concerned about the "Jena Six," how come they left the "Jena Six" still in jail? How come these concerned demonstrators did not raise the bail money for the "Jena Six?"
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
(HearTheTruth) only one is in jail, and he does not have bail, if you were so smart you would've known that before you made your comment. If there was a bail, you should've contributed your money just like all of the protesters to getting him out. You are American right? You do believe in the constitution right?
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
If the demonstrators contributed money, why are they still in jail?
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
blacktreemedia just told you... only one is locked up because he got an attempted murder charge. He is up for 22 years. there is not bail for a conviction
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
I am not smart, but I know he has a $90,000 bond. So how much did you contribute?
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
let me think.... about nothing... cause i say if you do the crime ... you do the time. i don't agree with thoughs kids being free. regardless of their color.
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
this rally is not about guilty kids...the bigger picture here is that the kids here did not get a decent trial.
EnriqueCruzBlog 4 years ago
Let the punishment fit the crime...
psalano 4 years ago
now i am all for a fair trial. thats all good by me.but don't rally around guilty kids. go after thoughs cases that went bad. retry thoughs cases and rally around a cause for fair justice in that.
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
now see this is wrong. sharpton is a good guy and all but you know what. by being there, it is saying that it's ok for a group of black kids to beat up one white kid and get off scot free. he wants that kid out of jail and back in school because what? because years of injustice has wronged them? don't defend guilt people.
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
All parties were guilty of fighting....that is not up for debate. But the injustice occurs when once again, black people are given outrageous penalties compared to whites. The white kids that hung the noose on the tree should be charged with a federal offense, as this is a hate crime. Since when did fighting in school = criminal charges??
reloadzzz 4 years ago
i understand that... but like i said... don't defend them. fight the wrongs that occured with thoughs cases he is using as an excuse to get these kid off this attempted murder rap. i said i am all for equal justice. but nat at the expense of guilty people running free.
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
"The white kids that hung the noose on the tree should be charged with a federal offense, as this is a hate crime."
========================
What's next? Federal crimes for toilet papering a tree? Any insult is an excuse to get violent? Get a real preacher, go read a bible, learn to properly deal with it. If a white someone yells "Ni..er" does that give someone a "right" to get violent? What if a black someone yells "H-nky"? Justify that too?
JoeZyzyx 4 years ago
The black students did not choose to get violent.They staged a sit in under the tree. Which was the reason 4 the district attorney to say,"I can end your life with the stroke of this pen".Now who do you think he was talking to?Racism is alive today and if you cant c it. It is because you my friend are to a racist
maryb1122 4 years ago
All I think he was saying is blacks are still not treated equally. If it would have been the other way around the white children's parents would have gotton the best lawyers and they would have still gotton off scott free. I also heard that some of the jury were kin to the white children. Now im not trying to say what the black children did was right because it wasn't. But that still doesn't give the white kids the right to go around and tie nooses to a tree. They to should have been punished.
erharris48 4 years ago
well think about it this way.... how many riots would occur in the black community to get an attempted murder charge on the white kids if they had beaten a black kid near to death. they would have been fighting the same fight as the whites are now. they are just using this as a reason to rally. so you see the white rally groups there protesting? no. they said they did not want to envoke an already harsh situation
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
(Sweetmystify) at any expense, the kid was not beaten to death if he could go to a function later that night. Suspension, maybe expulsion, but criminal charges at all would be a stretch in my eyes. Especially when 'terroristic threats' are looked on as a prank. Justin Baker brought a shotgun to school some weeks later and was expelled, so I don't think he is the 'innocent' victim here either.
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
didn't say he was innocent. don't put words in my mouth
sweetmystify31 4 years ago
I didn't put words into your mouth. I made a statement. You had left out his guilt in all of this, and pointed out the group that was charged with beating him up. I was just pointing out, that even after this 'crime' had occured, Justin Baker brought a shotgun to school, and wasn't charged with anything, but just expelled from school. So I think bringing a shotgun to school should be a crime if beating somebody up with your bear hands is a crime. I mean, fair is fair, right?
blacktreemedia 4 years ago
Sweetmystify31 What do you mean scott free? Bell is still in jail and has been for sometime now.What about the growin men that attack Bell at the party. Or what about the kid that had a sawed off shout gun which is illegal by the way.IF you dont see the injustic here than you are a racist and I dont care how many black friends you have.
maryb1122 4 years ago