@morbidguitar No, not really. I think they weigh about 100lbs more. There were 2 other SS/TCs there that same day running and both were coupes. They were both running 14.0-14.3 with same mods.
this car confuses me. i have same one 09 sedan tu.bo s and it should do 14 sec stock... i can only ge 14.5ish and u arnt getting stock numbers with two best upgrades (aside from dp)/
@demetrios77 Huh? Can I get that in plain english? The track I'm racing at is 5800ft above sea level, that's why it runs so slow compared to what people at lower elevations are running. Naturally aspirated cars that run low 13's at sea level only run low 14's up here. A stock LS1 F-Body is a low 14 second car @ 97-100mph on a good day. If you calculate the density altitude of the track at the time of the run in the video, at sea level I would have ran a 13.4 @ 106-ish.
Is the 4 door version any slower than the 2?
morbidguitar 6 months ago
@morbidguitar No, not really. I think they weigh about 100lbs more. There were 2 other SS/TCs there that same day running and both were coupes. They were both running 14.0-14.3 with same mods.
ForceFedProductions 6 months ago
@morbidguitar na there about the same
MrThatguy122 5 months ago
this car confuses me. i have same one 09 sedan tu.bo s and it should do 14 sec stock... i can only ge 14.5ish and u arnt getting stock numbers with two best upgrades (aside from dp)/
demetrios77 8 months ago
@demetrios77 Huh? Can I get that in plain english? The track I'm racing at is 5800ft above sea level, that's why it runs so slow compared to what people at lower elevations are running. Naturally aspirated cars that run low 13's at sea level only run low 14's up here. A stock LS1 F-Body is a low 14 second car @ 97-100mph on a good day. If you calculate the density altitude of the track at the time of the run in the video, at sea level I would have ran a 13.4 @ 106-ish.
ForceFedProductions 8 months ago