Added: 2 years ago
From: ingrahamrocketry
Views: 1,287
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the forward closure part that hold the delay and ejection charge is missing. I hope that doesn't happen to my 29/40-120 casing

  • At least it wasn't a forgotten ejection charge on a 750ft flight (2009 Rules) on a practice flight before the Finals. Left a hole 1ft deep, courtesy of the rocket that eventually won 2nd in nationals for the '09 year.

  • o-rings

    

  • Not aerotech's fault, it's whoever built the engine. Have had the same problem numerous times. It has to do with an o- ring inside.

  • zomg!!! That almost hit Mason!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 2nd

  • Yes it is a warrenty call to Aerotech. I have seen a few of late that have come up to pressure enough to leave the launch guide then quit, but this is the first I have seen go complete cato in that manner with the exception of a couple single use motors which catoed 15 into the lift off. I think they have an issue whith their new, cheaper AP supplier. Keep up the good work with the kids and hope they get to nationals.

    Chris Guenther

    NAR L2

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more