Added: 2 years ago
From: AmericanLifeLeague
Views: 11,529
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (133)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Some things about this would be a good thing

    Though some bad as well depending how it is done

  • I am really tired of Planned Parenthood trying to take over everything all for the sake of trying to "help people". Instead of throwing condoms or birth control pillspoorer people, (the pills are-btw, a carcinogen says the World Health Organization), and saying "hey - you over there! Screw anyone! you kids too! you can have sex because having sex just proves how evolved you are!" Why not educate people instead on ways not to spread disease. They are humans, not animals.

  • This is one of the most biased videos I've ever seen. Propoganda, that's all I have to say.

  • This guy is an idiot and intentionally misleading, interpreting text in absurd ways to meet his right wing agenda.

  • @WEL3 its exactly what they wrote.

  • The statement at 1:50 is beyond disgusting. In fact it's detrimental.

  • Go planned Parenthood!!!!! : D you guys are doing great.

  • @lambchopclmt fuck planned parenthood! those guys sucks! 

  • @kevinjjfr ok, i respect your opinion but can you tell me why? why do the suck? give an educated opinion please.

  • @lambchopclmt other then having killing 50 million Americans..... using tax dollars for this.....not telling women what they are really doing, trying to have it so parents are not allowed to teach their own children abstinence, pressuring women into killing their children,

    there is a reason about, 3, 4, 5 (not sure) of the people who helped row Vs wade get passed later converted to Catholicism and even worked to reverse this state encouraged racially motivated infanticide.

  • @kevinjjfr actually no tax dollars are used on abortion, tax dollars pay for free birth control and std checks. And i can only speak for my self but i was given an excellent counseling session before my abortion and was even allowed to see my sonogram.

  • @lambchopclmt And this same treatment will be provide for a 13 year old. :) without telling her parents, or filing the proper reports.

    Also i hope you know your the mother of a dead child, not a bag of tissue. your the one who has to live with that for the rest of your life, you had your child murdered in cold blood.

    any yes they do go to abortion. if i give you two dollars and you are wanting to buy two things for 2 dollars each, and you already have 2 dollars ....you can buy both of them.

  • @kevinjjfr And also, crisis pregnancy centers are payed for by tax dollars and they lie to women about pregnancy tests all the time, so that was a bad reason considering PP only uses tax dollars for things like bc.

  • @lambchopclmt Lie? o by telling them they having a living child? like any doctor knows?

  • @kevinjjfr i'm sorry i don't understan what you men. "they having a living child" what?

  • @lambchopclmt They have a living child. i mean exactly what i said.

  • @kevinjjfr what you said was "o by telling them having a living child" That grammar was horrible and i did not understand what you had said.

  • IPPF - Baby killers, assassins, liars, wolves in sheep's clothes. They are currently attacking Latin America and they have chosen my country, Brazil, to start their rampage to massive abortion promotion. Their official office is in Rio de Janeiro (although they keep a lot of other initiatives to promote their ideology). Please, alert more people and help preventing this organization from fooling so many people in the world, especially youngsters. Thanks for this video.

  • Of course they target churches. 

  • OMG publically enforced debauchery! What a nightmare!

  • is this for real!!!! will they really push this/???? oh my goodness.

  • HOW PERVERTED!!!

  • If God made you a man, be a man.

    If God made you a woman, be a woman.

    Don't decide one day you are a woman when you are a man or the other way around

  • I read Article 8, and there's nothing about removing the rights of parents to raise their children with modesty and chastity.

  • It only follows that one of the most sexually repressed religions would be up in arms against one of the most sexually permissive organizations.

    Most of us, I suspect, are somewhere between those extremes: We accept sex as normal and healthy, but we understand the need to be mature and responsible when it comes to expressing that sexuality.

  • Who thinks my comment is bad? Can you tell me why you think my comment is bad.

  • What seems the IPPF is wanting is taking other people's right's away at 4:29. It's like Planned Parenthood doesn't want other people to voice their oposition to their ideas. What IPPF is planning on doing looks very disgusting. Let's say I got elected to congress. If there was a bill that would cut funding to PP, I would vote for it. I think that if funding were to cut from this group, not only it would put them out of business, the government could save alot of money.

  • No surprise.....PP is just as INTOLERANT and FASCIST as all the rest of the radical left. WHO are THEY to decide that THEY can take away the FREEDOM OF SPEECH away from ANYONE!!

    And so how do they think they are going to SILENCE GOD HIMSELF!!!!

  • i'm sure YOU would be for beastiality you have no morals-as for the world being messed up it is be coz of the lib ideas which only denigrate people-look up the history of liberal missouri which was founded in the 1800 w/o any churches etc-they just proved that lib ways are destructive!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Yes, I think bestiality is wrong, but I find absolutely nothing wrong with two men who love each other very much being able to marry and have the same rights as heterosexual couples.

    Give me at least one example of how liberals have fucked up the world. Are they responsible for nearly 2,000 years of racism, ignorance, intolerance, and genocide? Of course not.

    You can't even spell for shit, you stupid uneducated redneck.

  • Former California Gov. Gray Davis and Los Angeles Mayor Villaraigosa.

  • Thank you.

  • Just when I thought PP couldn't get any more debase they go pull something like this.

    And interesting about their non-disclosure of sexual history, they're basically saying that an HIV/AIDS infected individual can have unprotected sex with whoever and not inform them. That's attempted murder/murder the IPPF is advocating.

    Shame on them. And shame on any idiot who thinks this is a good thing.

    Finally, I"d love to see them try and intro this in a country like Iran or Saudi. Hahah.

  • That map of all IPPF doctrines emanating from one source in Europe looks eerily familiar to another universal network which promotes one set of thoughts, views and actions on all of the above issues: the Roman Catholic Church.

  • Are you implying that Planned Parenthood is a religion?

    Very astute of you!

  • Great! I appreciate the humour, too.

    At the end, the aim of IPPF is erase any hard-earned civilization and make the Man slave of his own "basic instincts".

  • Lies, all Lies. Article 3 paragraph 13 says nothing about predators:

    All persons shall be free from the removal, extradition or expulsion or threats thereof to any State where they may face a well-founded fear of persecution based on sex, gender, gender identity, sexual history or behaviour or sexual orientation or HIV status.

  • You don't think a sexual predator has a "sexual history or behavior" that warrants him being extradited? Seems pretty clear such a fellow would fall under this protection.

  • If you would actually read the document, you might learn something rather than it being forced fed to you:

  • Principle 5 Ensuring sexual rights for all includes a commitment to freedom and protection from harm. The right to be protected from and to have recourse against, all forms of violence and harm underpins sexual rights.

  • Sexuality-related harm includes both violence and abuse of a physical, verbal, psychological, economic and sexual nature as well as violence against individuals because of their sex; age; gender; gender identity; sexual orientation; marital status; sexual history or behaviour, real or imputed; sexual practices or how they manifest their sexuality.

  • All children and adolescents are entitled to enjoy the

    right to special protection from all forms of exploitation. This includes protection from sexual exploitation, child prostitution and all forms of sexual abuse, violence and harassment, including coercion of a child to engage in any sexual activity or sexual practice and the use of children in pornographic performances and materials.

  • But I guess actually reading something would be too hard for you.

  • Sorry. I didn't read your comments. Too hard.

  • such as the child sexual abuser Roman Polanski who is being supported by a petition from hollywood actors,many of whom support planned parenthood....(just because he made some good films)

  • Planned Parenthood is the Devil in action.

  • Its time to exterminate the perverts with extreme prejudice

  • this society is SICK!!!!

  • Planned Parenthood promotes sexual perversion and promiscuitiy so they can reep the benefits of being paid to butcher the resulting unwanted babies. It's a mulitbillion dollar industry. Gonna split hell wide open. Only an idiot would subscribe to anything this self professed sex industry has to say.

  • @iprazhm funniest thing i have ever read. rubbish.

  • If I were you, I would be worried about breaking the Ninth Commandment so many times in a matter of 6 minutes. I would also worry about the fact that slander is illegal.

    Anyone here, read the actual Declaration (linked in the side bar), and see for yourself how misleading this video actually is.

  • What did he lie about? This is not just a matter of poor wording. If you know ANYTHING about Planned Parenthood, this is 100% consistent with their general MO.

    There's nothing false in this video, he quotes straight from the document.

  • Did you happen to read the Declaration? Because most of what he said weren't direct quotes, but biased misrepresentations of the literature.

  • Oh, yeah. Because reading all that bloated text word for word would make such interesting video.

  • I know, reading is hard!

  • Sure did! The whole thing!!! And it's NASTY!!!!!

    "Article 6: All persons have the right to exercise freedom of thought, opinion and expression regarding ideas on sexuality

    ...

    without arbitrary intrusions or limitations based on dominant cultural beliefs or political ideology, or discriminatory notions of public order, public morality, public health or public security."

    ... Uh, expression and public health, security, order, and morality can only mean things like the Folsom Street Fair.

  • You Christians, your minds are ALWAYS in the gutter.

    Yeah, and the very next section is probably NASTY to you as well:

    All persons have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, including the right to hold opinions without interference, within a framework of non-discrimination and respect for the evolving capacity of children.

  • This guy is a total paranoid weirdo! Protecting a person's sexual rights is important. There's no reason a person should be killed for their sexuality or gender identity, and that is what the IPPF is trying to prevent among other things.

    People need to stop imagining people taking things to the extreme. Public displays of sexuality does not mean having sex in public. Perhaps a gay couple holding hands and acting as a couple, but not two people having sex. People have no common sense.

  • Yeah, right, sure.

  • More sex, more abortions and a more degenerate culture means more money for Planned Parenthood.

  • Article 6 essentially states that an individuals sexual indulgences supersede any concern for "public order, public morality, public health and public security"

    In case you didn't know-rape, pedophilia, ephebophia, incest, necrophilia, bestiality and numerous other sexual perversions are made illegal by laws based on concerns for public order, public MORALITY, public HEALTH and public SECURITY"

    Our fears are only the natural reaction to applying logic to the text of the Declaration.

  • Don't you just love liberals? They think that in order to achieve non-discrimination, they need to eradicate all traces of justice, decency, humanity, dignity and morality.

  • The uninitiated are impressed by all those words. It sounds like some sort of legal judgment, and so some won't even question any of it. If IPPF believes what they are proposing is not wrong, why all the words?? Just come out with it and say, anything goes, and whoever disagrees, tough.

  • Problem reaction solution.

  • LIAR

    Article 3 paragraph 13 "All persons shall be free from the removal, extradition or

    expulsion or threats thereof to any State where they may

    face a well-founded fear of persecution based on sex,

    gender, gender identity, sexual history or behaviour or

    sexual orientation or HIV status."

    In some places being a homosexual, transgendered person, or even a non-virgin is a risk to that person's life and freedom at the hands of the government and society. It's not about predators, you smiley liar.

  • You provided the quote, the video paraphrases it well ... "protects sexual predators from extradition as a result of their sexual history or behavior." If a Polanski-type was only freely expressing his sexuality with a minor, this Article clearly seeks to protect him.

  • That's just stupid.

    No. Rape remains a crime.

    Homosexuality is crime punishable by death in some places. This is disgusting!

    It's about decriminalizing thing which should never be considered crimes.

  • "It's about decriminalizing thing which should never be considered crimes"

    The sexual abuse of a child should never be considered a crime?

    Of course there are some things that shouldn't be considered crimes,but they are. We can change these things without making harmful things legal.

    Do you feel that a pedophile has the 'right' to have sex with children? Or that a child should be conditioned to believe it's okay for an adult to have sex with them?

    Just curious...not attacking.

  • How thick can you get? Did you read my post? I wasn't talking about pedophiles and neither was IPPF in their declaration.

    Here it is again, article 3 paragraph 13

    "All persons shall be free from the removal, extradition or

    expulsion or threats thereof to any State where they may

    face a well-founded fear of persecution based on sex,

    gender, gender identity, sexual history or behaviour or

    sexual orientation or HIV status."

  • Does the Declaration limit sexual behavior?

    Why is it that pedophilia, necrophilia, ephebophila, incest, and a host of other sexual perversions are magically excluded from the realm of sexual behavior?

    Is it because society finds those acts abhorrent and immoral?

    But isn't that a violation of Article 6 which essentially states that an individuals sexual indulgences supersede any concern for "public order, public MORALITY, public HEALTH and public SECURITY"?

  • You conveniently left out the first word of that section:

    "....or DISCRIMINATORY notions of public order, public morality, public health or public security."

  • Laws against rape, pedophilia, fecalphilia, ephebophilia, bestiality, public nudity, public sex, incest, & a host of other sexual perversions are outlawed according to DISCRIMINATORY notions of public order, public morality, public health or public security."

    The nature of law is to make distinctions & discriminate against acceptable & unacceptable behavior.

    IPPF's Declaration is badly worded. In trying to eliminate prejudice they end up promoting sexual relativism, debauchery, & hedonism.

  • FYI, am aware of Principle 5 which in theory would take care of those sexual behaviors that use coercion and violence (i.e. rape, pedophilia) but everything else would still stand.

    In any case, these rights are made up.

  • Article 3 paragraph 13 is about preventing sexual violence against refugees. If you don't believe me, go read the declaration for yourself, and then follow think in the footnote provided. (53, I think)

    In some places orientation, gender identity, and sexual history are reasons for people to fear for their lives at the hands of others.

    Why are you so against protecting people from discrimination and violence?

  • Please answer the questions I asked you.

    As to your question....I am not against protecting people from discrimination and violence.

    I am against protecting pedophiles who harm innocent children with their 'sexual preference'.

  • I answered your question. Do did the declaration. Try reading it for what is says, and not making up stuff, hm?

  • wow, did you actually read the document? Or just watch the propaganda video?

    Like did you read Principle 5? I thought not.

  • @nycpup...the real question is ..did you?

    Peace and much love.

  • Of course I did, I always read and learn as much as I can about a topic before I make some random comment on the youtubes. Unlike some people...

  • You see, I always see the best in people and what they are trying to do - making the world a better place for all of us. Most Christians have their minds in the gutter and always expect the worst in people.  Not a very peaceful and loving way to live.

  • I've gone back and read your comments now that I have a moment, and it seems to me that you never actually read the entire document. And if you did, you brought along all of your preconceived prejudices. Maybe you should take a different look at the world and the way it works. It might do you some good.

  • Everything stated in that video is a LIE. It really is amazing that you would believe any of it. Are you that gullible? As a minority do you not respect the struggles of other minorities, say sexual minorities, like those that are gay? If not, then you really have nothing to add to the discourse of this topic.

  • Reread my posts and Chillax.

  • Did and I stand by what I said, you obviously haven't read the entire document. The document specifically protects children from sexual exploitation of any kind.

  • We'll just agree to disagree. I have no ill feelings towards you...don't take my disagreement personally okay.

  • why would I take anything you've said personally? You actually haven't said anything. You seem to have your set ideas and nothing, not even the truth, will change that. :)

  • Sure. :0)

  • Doesn't it bother you that these policies effectively decriminalize things which should ABSOLUTELY be considered crimes?

    pedophilia

    exhibitionism

    rape

    incest

    Doesn't that bother you?

  • It would bother me if I was dumb enough to pretend that garbage was true.

    Please read the declaration. Even a cursory glance shows it doesn't do any of those things you describe.

  • Why is it that pedophilia, exhibitionism, rape, incest, necrophilia, ephebophilia, ect. do not lie in the realm of sexual behavior.

    How is that Article 6 does not, if ever adopted, legalize all laws limiting an individual sexual behavior?

    The Declaration is just poorly worded and written. Its overly broad and vague and if you are incapable of recognizing this then that is just scary.

  • Google IPPF declaration. Read it and know why this person is a liar.

  • Aside from sexual predators being allowed in the classroom, this seems like a a bunch of right winged non sense. Homosexuals don't have the right to hold hands? Really? While we are at it, why don't we just reinstitute slavery.

    This guy states an example such as Article 3 paragraph 13, BUT what he shows in the video of Article 3 has NO relationship to that which he states. None of it did.

    This guy is just perpetuating more left vs right paradigm, and that's BS.

  • I was on the IPPF website, can anyone find what this guy STATES to be fact from what the article actually says?  Because I can't find any of it. He shows one thing and states another. However, people will just watch this and believe whatever this clown says.

  • Comment removed

  • This makes me want to GAG. I HATE Planned Parenthood even more. That organization is a vile and disgusting creation of the DEVIL. God Help us.......

  • You shall not kill babies

  • What!!!! is this for real? This too evil. You are making me sick. What is this world come to?

    That means the trafficking women for prostitution and forced Abortion.

    But seriously. Thank you for the warning.

    But God is in control. The wicked will not always prosper. And The Needy will not always be forgotten.

    God Bless You

    Danny

  • No, this isn't real. This guy is full of shit. This declaration is about nondiscrimination.

    Google 'IPPF Declaration' and read it for yourself.

  • Guy, I'm reading it. Look at yourself. It opens the door to everything he has said. "sexual

    and reproductive right". Always means "Abortion on Demand". Or unfair laws to give extra privileges to Homosexuals over others.

    "child brides and girl mothers particularly need our compassion" "Child Brides"? What kinda sick evil is this? That's trafficking of women.

    It's world with out restraint. It's evil and chaos. It's pure evil.

  • It's not promoting child brides. It's saying they're a marginalized group in need of protection.

    What 'special rights' to homosexuals? You mean like the right to not be harassed and discriminated against for their orientation? Oh yeah, how evil.

  • Guy, I'm done it clearly does and says so on it PDF file. Sexual orientation, Child Brides, Young married girls. And reproductive rights. That is Plan Parent hood term.

    I will not this back and forth.

    We are done

  • IPPF has had a long track record of opposing child marriage. Google 'IPPF Child Marriage.' You'll find a PDF called "Ending Child Marriage a Guide for Global Policy Action." Research, it's a beautiful thing.

    NOW we're done.

  • Hey Psykko,

    I took your advice and just read the IPPF document. It's all there, dude!

    If Article 3 paragraph 13 isn't clear enough for you on the point of protecting sexual predators from extradition, then perhaps you can explain principle 3.

    Keep in mind that the principles are those philosophies that the articles are based on. So it is perfectly well within reason to take article 3 PP 13 within the context of principle 3 on non-discrimination.

  • I read principal 3. It is indeed about nondiscrimination. What's your point?

  • The point is that according to principle 3 ... which was posted in the video ... is written in such a way that sexual predators cannot be discriminated against based on their past convictions, even when it comes to applying for a job in a place like a daycare center.

    This doesn't bother you???

  • Sexual freedom huh? That means that they support organizations like NAMBLA, who are just a bunch of CHILD MOLESTERS. If this were to pass, then they wouldn't be held legally responsible for their quote "sexual gratification" eventhough they were having sex with a child which is molestation. How many laws would this subvert? Honestly it's disgusting.

  • This is the future if we don't act now; Brave New World.

    To think we paid for this by our tax dollars!

  • I've seen internet postings condemning parents for teaching their children in the ways of chastity before... Obviously, I was disgusted, but to think that they would make such a thing a legal issue?! *shudder* How can we monitor this situation and see just how far along this declaration is coming?

  • RaistliniltsiaR, it's a United Nations thing. While monitoring it may be important, we are far better off to notate the phone numbers and addresses of our national and local elected officials, and tell them plainly that we will not tolerate the evisceration of our human rights or those of our progeny.

  • I think I was tired when I posted this. Just to make sure we're all on the same page, I was disgusted that people were condemning others for teaching chastity. Because chastity is a good thing. I just wanted to clear that up.

  • Sexual autonomy is just a safe way of saying "having sex with whoever you want, no matter their age." This is not just religious propaganda Ahaz. "Sexual autonomy" is something that people like Margaret Sanger have been pushing since the 20's. Now sexual freedom between two people of legal age is one thing, but this would clearly make it ok, and even illegal to speak out against, if a 40 year old man wanted to have sex with a13 year old girl/boy. That is molestation, and it is illegal and sick.

  • Yes, that is sick. But that's not what the declaration is actually about. If you don't believe me, go read it yourself. I can't provide URLs in Youtube comments so just google 'ippf declaration.' You'll find it doesn't at all resemble this man's accusations.

    Which is probably why he didn't provide a direct link to it.

  • I have read it for myself psykkodukk, and everything that the man claims is in there IS indeed in there. This is what Margaret Sanger wanted the entire time. It would indeed subvert quite a few laws, and is just disgusting.

  • So, if your daughter was traumatically raped, and bearing and carrying that child around was increasing stressful and traumatic in itself, what does it become then? A test of Gods will? I'm sure it does. Everything will always be attributed to some "test" of faith.

    So, let's see..if everything in the universe is energy, and energy can neither be created nor destroyed, and you apparently believe in life after death, what then is destroyed or killed by abortion? Nada.

  • This man is just making shit up. I actually read the declaration, which he couldn't be bothered to link to. It says nothing like this propiganda this man spews.

    I'm prochoice myself, but I respect prolifers and what they stand for, I used to be one myself.

    I just hate it when people, on either side, have to use lies and scare tactics to derail rational discussion. Thanks for calling the bullshit out.

  • I don't see any logical defence for the pro-choice arguments. I see no reason to use propaganda. The truth is much more effective. This is just something for red necks to masturbate to. Bullshit and it only makes things worse.

  • I do, but I'm not here to argue them. It just burns my hide to see such blatant disregard for the truth. Unfortunately, I'm seeing a lot of it lately.

  • Try studying the Israel Palestine issue. Norman Finkelstein passes for a legitimate scholar when it comes to that. But anyway, we agree. Propaganda=bad.

  • I didn't find anything in the video to be untrue. I read the IPPF document as psykko suggested, and everything this guy said is born out.

    Maybe you think everyone should be able to act as they like in their own bedrooms. We can debate morality, but the stuff about decriminalizing public sex acts, public nudity, self-gender identity, and protecting sexual predators is all there.

    And if you think those things are NOT in there, I'd like for you to explain away the evidence!

  • Special rights to Sexual Predators? Welll why not? Since they ARE already murderers and all...

  • This is the scariest video you have ever made. If you had made it in 2006 or a report like this was created back then I would have said this was a fabrication but because the devil and IFPP is on steroids these days I totally believe you and am disgusted...

  • This scares the heck out of me that the IPPF is pushing this debauchery on us. It's bad enough that they kill babies, but now they're after our rights as parents and citizens of a moral society too!?

  • Man, what evil evil fuckers.

  • Evil seems like a pretty harsh term. The American Lie League is just misguided and blinded by their own agenda.

  • Okay, that's your premise, now why don't you offer an argument based on reason and evidence?

  • Well, i was simply making a humourous comment. I believe psykkodukk has covered all the bases. Other than their stance on abortion, which is debatable, the rest of what the IPPF is trying to do is make discrimination based on sex/gender and sexual orientation illegal and to potect people from said discrimination. It may surprise you but in much of the world being gay or having sex before marriage if you're a woman can get you killed.

  • The Declaration is poorly worded. Its over-broad and vague.

    This means two rational people can come to reasonably differing conclusions on how to interpret and apply these "rights".

    Its debatable on whether IPPF had the right intentions when drafting this document but it cannot be argued that unless they specifically limit "sexual behaviors" then Article 6 has the effect of permitting a host of sexual deviancies that most people would consider depraved.

  • Match this:

    No person shall be denied identity papers which indicate his/her gender or sex as reflecting the persons selfdefined gender identity, including but not limited to birth certificates, passports and electoral records.

    with this:

    No person shall be forced to undergo medical

    procedures, including sex reassignment surgery, sterilization or hormonal therapy, as a requirement for legal recognition of their gender identity

    And you find Truth!

    This guy did not lie!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more