Added: 4 years ago
From: TheRealistCanuck
Views: 2,621
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (88)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • My videos are legit and so are the views but people never rate =(

  • Black You Tubers>? What an idiot.

  • hey this has 74 ratings and 2,279 veiws

  • @hayguylol What??

  • @faroutadventures it was 8 months ago

  • what's the name of the song..i would like to learn to play it on my keyboard..btw check out my channel lol :D:D

  • cool song

  • you have 2,000 views and only 66 rating why is that?

  • your bullshit! My first video I ever uploaded has 6,000 views and only 33!

  • i heard somewhere that you cant very many views from autorefreshing...

    like it doesnt work or something....i dunno

  • Wow he is great at math 10 percent of 200 is 20 ! ! ! I give you 5 stars for that!!!

  • This canuck has a good point. He got my 5 stars. Legitimately.

  • what a retard. I searched for just a11en and got this idiot.

  • haha he said black guys get more views

  • if u know how to cheat why arent u partner

  • most people dont rate if the video isnt terrible or great

  • according to your math your cheating also

    as of 1:45 am 5/19/08 you have 1,607 view and 41 ratings. i'll do the math, thats 2%

    2 out of every 100 of your veiws rated, but your not cheating and i know this because you only have 1,607 views, and why stop there.

    all i'm saying is your math is wrong, and the logic is too. If its a YT partner more than likely there autorefreshing and ip hopping because thats how most got there and thats how most of them make there money

    the answer

    money > integrity

  • C'mon, we don't do that... *talks on phone* "He knows too much, send the SWAT team."

  • are you fucking retarded? hellooooooooo most people don't even fucking rate because they dont want to dumbass

  • thats wrong my vid has 4.2k views and 40 rating 40 favs.... all natural

  • 1534 views, yet only 39 ratings? AUTOREFRESHER!

  • i actually looked at all my video subscriptions (roughly 50 videos) and i couldnt find ONE video to be within your 5-15% range. your 5-15% thing isnt valid. the HIGHEST percent i could find was around 3.6%, falling well short. now im saying your 5-15% thing doesnt work.

  • when i watched this video, you had 1,474 views, and only 37 ratings. thats about 2.5%.im not accusing you of anything. but, your own video doesnt fall into your 5-15% thing. and if the numbers about just a11en are correct, then yea that does seem a little strange. but im saying maybe people just werent rating him.

  • This version of "Eye Of The Tiger" is a travesty. I dislike you a bit for having heard it on your vid.

  • That was very hard to find and download. Very rare peice.

  • As it should be. As it should be.

  • Hehehe

  • Perhaps you'd be less angry if you lived further from the Arctic....says the smartass Floridian.

  • True. I really dislike Canada. Florida must be great

  • Just stay off South Florida roads. It's bad, man. I grew up here and I'm surprised daily by the madness of the drivers. I've seen people I KNOW do stupid things. Stop signs are optional. Red lights too. A couple years ago a cop ran over a tourist in Miami. She was laying on the ground. On a towel. On the beach.

  • Okay, now I've read all the comments. I have a new problem.

    TRC, you say the fact that this video has such high views "proves" your point. If you didn't a-r your own video, how on earth does it prove that A11en *did* a-r HIS? You've got to see how convoluted the logic is here. Even if YOU personally believe he did, there is no proof whatsoever. You really should give it up. I think you'd redeem yourself somewhat if you gave it up AND apologized.

  • Oh I'm a realist. I don't go by 'if's' and 'possibilities' and 'exceptions'.

    I just challenge you to take a look at the ratio of ratings to views on all the vlogger videos you see for the next week, then look at his and draw your own concolusion.

    I guess technically I can't prove anything, but lots of things are unproveable; like the sky being blue.

  • 1221 views and 27 ratings. Using your formula, shouldn't you have 61.05 to 183.15 ratings at 5 to 15 percent?

    Here is my question. Have you ever tried to apply an auto-refresher to someone else's video? Can it be done?

    If it *can* and if it's against the rules, what's to stop someone who hates you from doing it to your video, to try and get you in trouble? As long as there's a window left open, I'd be reticent to state that someone DID something there's no proof for. Of course, that's IF.

  • LOL still being a putz? tisk tisk

  • See I call myself the The*REALIST*Canuck for a reason. Because I don't cling to believing in things that aren't reality (like how women don't have rights, or like how it's just a fluke that some poeple magically break out of the 5-15% ratio) etc.

    I'm a realist. I believe in the reality of right now.

    Right now, any kind of womens movement is nonsense and has no become political football.. Umm.. don't you have a woman soon running for President?

  • So now that he is falling under his own theory it cant be HIM that is auto refreshing... no way thats possible.. so we take his word over anyone else on YT? strange days my friends..

  • If you want to think that the 5-15% is total nosense and has no bearing while 1 tuber gets consistenty breaks that ratio on many of his videos, then what can I say. You'll believe what you want.

    Ok let's make this more simple:

    How many people here think that I got 1,100 legitimate views on this video? Just becuase the number says it you believe it?

    Lol..

  • It happens to lots of people, thats what you dont understand. Do you know how to look for outside links to videos? Those outside links dont allow comments or ratings.. not everyone is out to cheat the system, you are paranoid.

  • tossing out accusations with not even a shred of evidence is typical guerilla agenda driven tactics beneath anyone with an iq over 75.

  • lol...so did i auto refresh my pengies vid? or my tag vid? or my vid about theboringdispatcher?

  • No Pengies most likely refreshed it himeself. I know my video here was refreshed which just proves my point. Actually.. pengies refreshed one of his vids to 35,000 views or something like that.

  • This is the video where this comment belongs:

    You must have missed the drama between Inmendham about a week ago, when he blocked me. Do your homework TRC. You are only reinforcing your image as someone who talks out of their ass.

    I disagree with Inmendham about 40% of the time, btw.

  • Funny how in just a few hours my vid is magically up at 900 views and I have *never* gotten that many views on any of my vlog rated videos. I do about 30-200 tops. I'm a nobody on this site.

    I wonder which joker auto-refreshed this video?

    Either way, it just proves my point and I think everyone can see how easy it is to get your views up.

  • You know you auto-refreshed your own video. Don't act like you aren't a cheater.

    And this is all you have to say? No response to the people who totally debunked your theory?

  • I am going to take this comment as an admission that ANYONE could have auto refreshed Justa11en's videos. Thank you for admitting that he is not necessarily a cheater. Now...an apology to the man would be nice.

  • I think the only thing that's really been proven is that a video that is linked-to by outside sites gets more views than it gets ratings. Your video is on utubedrama. You're getting tons of views from there but no ratings. That DISproves your theory.

  • Getting the attention you needed? You doing a video about him for momentary attention imo is just as silly as the theory that people with high views auto refresh based on how many ratings they get lol

  • Regardless on your opinion of this matter Allen is a cheater, you yourself mentioned the fact he encouraged people to spam him. Anyways, just my opinion on the subject.

  • Where on here did I come out and say that Allen encouraged people to spam him? I have no proof of that.. I believe I said I dont know if he does or not.. meaning that he might.. or maybe he doesnt.. I dont know..

  • I am referring to one video where he used his JAverbatim to spam Airrick. I'm not trying to fight with you, I would have to look for the video you made, it wasn't about him and you didn't name him "specifically" maybe I assumed you were talking about him and you weren't. This is Smapp btw so you don't think I'm some random person. How's Las Vegas?

  • Oh, I dont know much about that account.. I only watch his main account.. and Vegas is nice.. should be putting up a new video very soon.. some of my Vegas video will be on my vlogs channel..

  • Cool, I'll check it out. Have a great trip, are you on straight shoot or do you have a layover?

  • layover in DC back now.. wanted to put up a video tonite.. but with maint I will just wait.. lol

  • Lol, yeah I don't blame you. You should stickam tonite, it'll be fun. See ya around the playground.

  • zomg please stop auto-refreshing this video.. the views and comments just dont add up!

  • I love when people just make up "facts" and statistics. I NEVER have that ratio of ratings to my views. In fact, I usually complain that I don't get many ratings. I have a friend, however, that ends up with almost as many ratings as he does views. It's not science.

  • "Sorry A11en, you now have to suffer the consequences of your personal choices" lol

    Next time do your homework.

    766 views 18 ratings... STOP IT!!!

  • hey I know from my own experience that your ratio of ratings to views is not accurate. I have a video with 30,000 views and only about 100 ratings. The bulk of the views came through links. Where the heck does this "fact" come from?

  • I had my Puppets-a go-go video categorey featured a while back, at the time it had around 800 views, not sure of the ratings, but I think it was around 12. After the feature it jumped to over 12,000 views yet only 6 comments and 49 ratings. I did not do any refreshing or cheating.

  • Even if you are right on the ratios being this way generally, that does not prove anyone is auto-freshing. I mean I watch one particular Danny Diamond video over and over but he never asked me to do it.

  • Not sure I follow all your logic but I like this video.

  • So you aren't going to respond to me, or others, that have proven your statements incorrect? I don't expect an apology, but a man of " personal integrity" knows how to admit when they are wrong.

  • 220 views and 14 ratings.. only 23 comments.. zomg AUTO REFRESH!

  • By your "Ratio" idea, you sir would be labeled a cheater. Funny how you make these accusations about someone, and when they post a comment on your video you don't have a rebuttal for it.

  • You have very good camera presence and verbal skills and usually enjoy your vids... but your logic is not grounded on anything and can be easily refuted.

    And you are wrong about the Partner Program. Nobody emails you back and tells you "you don't have the traffic or views". It's all form letters. A few ytbers have shared this. AND there are DOZENS of partners with much fewer views & subs than JA.

    And anything Skehan says is suspect.

  • Actual rejection letter from Youtube:

    "...if your content, volume, or prominence increases in the future, please consider re-applying"

    That's a real rejection letter. I'm not making it up:

    watch?v=0Ay5MGDQ54M

    And yes, obviously, featured videos will have more views that break the 5-15% ratio, but not on a regular basis.

    Victor you are a team player to the core when it comes to Youtube.

    Me? I just call it as I see it.

    Anyone who contributes to Youtube should be a paid partner

  • The reason YT doesnt make everyone a paid partner is because so many jerks out there abuse copyright. I know that lots of copyrighted material is on YT, we see it all day long.. so can you imagine if those people were allowed to get paid for that? I know the system might not be fullproof right now but to assume that everyone that becomes a partner is shady is just fail

  • Most partners have done it too. But most have stopped after becoming partners.

  • some partners had videos removed too.. apples and oranges.. the point is that it would be out of control if they werent somewhat selective

  • Canuck, A real team player blindly agrees with their friends. I don't. I don't blame you for not knowing this. That would be egotistical.

    Regarding the letter: that's a form letter. I've seen it about 3 times--other ytbers have emailed me that letter. They're all the same. The key word is "OR".

    I can easily name a few who aren't partners have no copyright material YET have the views.

    "Me? I just call it as I see it." This is the most overused and meaningless catch phrase of you "rebels." LOL!

  • no anyone that a private company decides they want to represent their commercial clients should be a paid partner, if that really. this isnt socialism, dictating who and who shouldn't be is the decision of youtube.

  • I believe, I am not speaking for YT on this one, but that letter is the same for everyone that isnt accepted. I would probably suspect that the letter itself is just a generic letter that is mailed out to anyone that doesnt meet their criteria. I guess they dont want to be specific.. This was a comment response for Victor

  • Hey aiiricks, Yeah. I agree.

  • wheres mike skehan?

  • i have a video that has 18000 views and about 100 ratings. i think it got stuck in emmelina's autoplay.

    i have others that have 300 views and 80 ratings.

    who cares?

  • YOUR RATIO IS WAY OFF CHEATER! oops there 1 star fixed it.

  • Lol. Best comment yet.

  • I am not defending Allen, he can do that himself but a video on my channel, "one guy one spoon" which is a parody of one girl one cup currently has 76,000 views yet only 115 ratings.. however that video has been linked to many websites and I am even shocked @ the amount of views.. when linked to outsources you wont get ratings.. so that logic doesnt work in ever instance..

  • Also about the partner program. I was under 800 subs when I was accepted and still dont get nearly as many views as the other larger partners, so auto refreshing isnt the only way people get into the program.

  • I agree with a lot of what youre saying in regards to people cheating, I dont know if Allen auto refreshes or not HOWEVER I do know that you didnt do enough investigation to win the argument. In my opinion you leave too many loose ends and no solid evidence for your reasons. Thats why I avoided this topic so many times because its just too hard to prove it unless its grossly overused..

  • You also contradict yourself a lot towards the end. You say that if you dont take it seriously and if you want to spam comments whatever, kinda brushing it off but obviously you do take it seriously, you made the video =/ man sorry this could have been an epic video but this wasnt a win in my opinion, nice shot though..

  • wow A11en calm down :P

  • It's a fact....because it just is....because it's a fact....becasue that's the way it is? This is called circular logic, and is nonsensical. You cite nothing as a reference for your theory, except that it is "commonly known"....by you. I gave an example, on Leafs vid, from today, and you ignored it. If one were so inclined, they could give examples all day long, that disprove it.

  • The ratios on vids are thrown out of whack, on a regular basis. That video, along with my "Going Bald" vid, were featured in the Mobile section on the YT home page. I got a small # of ratings on the bald vid, but a lot of hits in a couple days. I don't think you could even rate a mobile vid then. You can now, but thats in the "new features" section.

  • The views/ratings/comments also get skewed when a vid is embedded. Each of those were embedded by multiple websites, at one time, because of the nature of their content. The "freak" vid used to be linked to all kinds of tattoo and piercing sites. Another example is my Golf vid. It was embedded on over 40 websites at one time. With the few links it has now, (5) it has over 150 clicks. None of those can be rated or commented on. Just another example of your "formula" being flawed.

  • Integrity with the "community.":I started YourTubeAdvocate when I had a small sub base, with nothing to gain. If it was for self promotion, I would have never handed it off to another user, and set it up, the way it is structured. I gave it to a user with a smaller sub base, and have continued to support it even when I haven't been thrilled with the current advocate's direction. I have always been active, and vocal, in the community. YouTube Respect Campaign?

  • A lot of this is spawned by my comments on the Community Council vid. Go read them for yourself. Anyone who isn't a complete moron can tell that, other than Brad, I have no problems with individual members. I had problems the actual video, and the way Staff is using the CC as a PR tool and focus group. That's not the CC members fault. They signed the NDA's before being aware of what they were getting into, and what it would entail.

  • As for your assertion of "e-cheating", my friends, and people that really know me, are laughing their asses off. I got this computer (my 1st) a few weeks before posting my 1st vid. (8months ago?) I know what auto refreshing is, but had now idea how to do it. Ask around and find out how often I bug people to help me with the most basic computer/internet related task/and questions.

  • Some site my editing as proof of tech know how, when in reality it's my iMac (which is the only reason I even considered posting as soon as i did) great, user friendly apple software, and an assload of hours spent on things that computer literate people could do in half the time. You might call that technological wizardry but it's not on my part. It's more akin to giving a gun to a monkey. I keep shooting, and over time some of the bullets hit something.

  • FTR The only reason i've spent the time comment on this vid, is that i've watched a few of your vids, and you seem like a reasonable guy who hasn't considered all the variables. If you do so, and still believe what you've stated is accurate, then so be it. That's your right and I know what I'm "about" regardless of anything I watch or see.

  • BTW I just reviewed the comments and realized I really should spend more time proof reading. It was not my intention to type in Hebrew. I think you can decipher most of what was said witout the Rosetta stone. If not, send me a PM and ill clarify anything that sounds like gibberish.

  • without* damn. did it again.

  • allen why are you even bothering with this unibrow...?

  • LOL. FGT.

  • Hey dude. Allen has been my friend for quite awhile. And because he's a friend of mine, I support him. Mike Skehan has been my friend for quite awhile as well. I respect and trust both. As far as Allen cheating...I just don't see him doing that. I know we've had our differences as well but I honestly do respect your opinions as well. Communication is what it's all about. Cheers!

  • Where's your evidence?

    First, lots of people watch videos who don't have accounts, so they can't rate.

    Second, after you've rated, you can't rate again, so you might watch a video again and again.

    Third, if you're a nice person like me, you don't hand out ratings all the time, especially poor ones.

  • I disagree about the rateings, I have never used auto refresh and my rateings are considerably less than that percentage.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more