Added: 5 years ago
From: brianting
Views: 242,794
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (396)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I do not know if there is a God for mankind.

    But for sure there is a God for musicians, before whom every musician will kneel down, and his name is Bach.

  • this sound...this melody...this harmony....just beautiful Horowitz, Bravo. Thanks brianting, very much :)

  • Wonderful!!

  • Perfection from start to finish!

  • What a music...

  • Bach's music is the soul in conversation with itself.

    At its centre it is a community as diverse as it is complete in itself.

    The oneness of being.

  • magic ...

  • what is a rubato?

  • I live off his smile at the end!

  • The little Bach he performed publicly and recorded is unfortunate. Horowitz obviously deeply loved the music and his interpretations sing with exquisite tenderness as this intimate performance in his home attests. It’s not surprising that he chose Bach’s glorious organ toccata to usher in his re-emergence on the concert stage in his “historic return" Carnegie Hall concert in '65. He referred to it as his “good luck” piece.

  • Good job from the sound engineer: well pushed-up canto, bass honorably dimmed. Horowitz is not bad neither.

  • absolutely beautiful interpretation i love how soft and delicate he plays it without losing the tempo, the phrasing is perfect and the ending bars are heavenly played!

  • "..it was very beautiful, very beautiful..."

    Horrowitz: " But I didn't compose it.... "

    In this line he shows his sadness. His dream was to become a composer afterall. I bet he is composing in the life after ;)

  • @RemovdSande11 So true! Thank´s!

  • Very nice interpretation! i'm looking for a score and/or midi file of this transcription...any links? thanx

  • A musicalidade deste homem exala até pelos poros dele!

  • Although I really admire Horowitz (who doesn't?), I believe that the best version ever played is the one by Dinu Lipatti.

  • @minasgekos no way man it cant get better than this

  • @TommyDai1 have you heard the version that I mentioned? Cause if you haven't... you should :))

  • @minasgekos yes i have, but this version is way better you can almost taste every note he plays

  • what a genial transcription, my God

  • Beau. Lumineux. Éblouissant. C'est comme une ardente prière; une angoisse qui trouve une plage de paix. Huit à l'échelle de Richter qui en compte neuf, je pense. C'est un tremblement de cœur. Du Horowitz à son meilleur. J'adore. En effet, à la racine, cette fleur qui s'épanouit dans le champs du silence, est née du génie universel de Bach. Même les Romantiques ont su en faire quelque chose de romantique et notre pianiste lui, lui donner de son souffle. Merci, Horowitz, pour ce fanal dans la nuit

  • I made a playlist with only this piece of music in it so every time I am writing a poem I can listen to my life being told by the sounds coming out of that piano.

  • absolutely phenomenal.. I want to be a better person after listening to this video..

  • Alfred Brendel plays it even better.

    And the Bach-Busoni piece 'Ich ruf zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ' is a similar great work.

    Angels weep.

  • Bach is Lord

  • magnifique interprétation, il fait bien ressortir le chant. Bravo !!!

  • I´ve been looking for the sheet music for sooo long. Havent found it yet, even on local sheet music shops! By the way, Horowitz is surely more than an artist. This rendition, even at his late age, shows all the power of the human soul. I know that for each pianist there is a different interpretation. But for me, Horowitz is undoubtedly the most touching of them all. Sorry for my creepy english!

  • Horowtiz isn´t playing the piano here. He´s singing the piano. It´s a channeling of spirit. If you wonder why Callas is special in the vocal field, and Horowitz is special, that´s the reason. Emotions get shallow.. this has to do with soul, being. His comment at the end said it all as a response to the compliments: "I didn´t compose it!" He´s the artist not standing in way of the intention of the Art.

  • Comment removed

  • Incredible beautiful mind that sounds here..... Wish to be there at the end of my life.

  • I miss him so dearly, what a beautiful mind, and this is in fact very well done.... his touch is so amazing...perfection. R~

  • Yes, everyone has preferences. This piece is unfamiliar to me, but hearing it I've already fallen in love. That may be because I'm a classical nerd, but those who seriously want to talk about how Horowitz doesn't play "right", or simply they don't like the piece, well I can say you're not hearing or seeing what's truly being played. That of course is still just my opinion.

  • ...and he smiled. True genius.

    Have anyone noticed that there's no pianist who could play piano (as an opposition to forte, not an instrument) in a manner Horowitz did it? His "piano" was like no one's else.

  • Damn foos shut up and listen.Damn foos shut up and listen.Damn foos shut up and listen.Damn foos shut up and listen.Damn foos shut up and listen.Damn foos shut up and listen.

  • One of the most beautiful thing I listened during my life...Horowitz: the best sound=the best pianist!

  • if you can't say something nice, don't say nothing at all. :)

  • Creo que Vladimir Horowitz es el mejor pianista del mundo, sin embargo, para Beethoven me quedo con Arthur Rubinstein. Admiro a ambos genios del piano.

  • Creo que Vladimir Horowitz es el mejor pianista del mundo, sin embargo, para Beethoven me quedo con Arthur Rubinstein. Admiro a ambos genios del oiano.

  • it's impossible to play better...

  • @sonodavide ...because it's Horowitz. He and Sviatoslav Richter were the best pianists in the world. Npwadays there's no pianists of such a level.

  • you must be crazy not to like this

  • @minasgekos I resent that!

    I'm crazy and I love it.

  • indisputable the most beautiful thing between heaven an earth.... words are insufficient

  • Ugly sound on the melody. Yes, it's supposed to be very marked but that doesn't mean it should be permanently forte!

  • This is unmatchable. I would be happy to go to my grave with this video being played. The lifetime of experience and sensitivity that he conveys, with the most utter control of the keyboard sound - in his mid 80s - it's just incredible.

  • Horowitz and Bach...a good match. Vladimir seems to be capable of expressing and impressing without really touching the keys. Kinda floating over them instead.

    Bach always seems to be capable of writing incredibly expressive pieces of music while using half or even less the number of notes others would need to achieve a similar result.

    Join the virtuoso composer and the maestro performer and you get this kind of subtle performance.

    Excellent.

  • he has got mind boggling controle over the sound. It also looked like that piano had a very soft touch in the keys. I mean low resistence. Or maybe that was juste his technique that made me think that. He is playing in a quite peculiar way imo: he barely juste touches the keys sometimes. That shouldn't be possible ><

  • @elroi92 He had a very good piano. One of the best I know of.

  • i am idicted to the sound of horowitz!

  • grandioso...

  • how is such sound possible?

    this recording is a gem of piano playing.

  • To understand the remark of Horowitz ''I didn''t compose it'' you have to know that Horowitz always wanted to be a composer, but he did not succeed. Instead he became one of the best pianists of the world, but that was less important to him.

    About this interpretation of Bach-Busoni: in my opinion it is even more beautiful than the original, it creates a divine/melancholic atmosphere.

  • This is beyond any words.

  • "I din't compose it"... hilarious!

  • @genomos90 Meh, a little trite.

  • well, i still prefer kempff's version.

    but horowitz variatons of carmen theme is perfect

  • great beyond words. we are lucky we live in the era of recorded sound and we are able to hear miracles like this

  • It's amazing how he accentuates the melody with such ease

  • vielen dank für dieses stück musik(geschichte)...thanks for posting...

  • A legend,,,last of the romantics,,,,,in short a chatacter who breathed art and its beauty,,

    welcome to the age of note perfect digital souless musak.

  • Simply magnificent. Thank you so much for posting.

  • breathtaking

  • OMG - how i like! The immortal Vladimir Horowitz.

  • The definition of divine.

  • Oh, I love this.  I love his smile at the end. I love.... the complete lack of pretension here.

  • 100% respect

  • Of course it's all a matter of taste, but I prefer the ''Slavian'' interpretation of Bach by Horowitz much more than the original middle-european interpretations. The piece becomes more sensitive and less static, thanks to Horowitz!

  • This is just the Eternity, in five minutes.

  • Magistral horowitz,típica obra maestra atemporal de Bach donde se puede y se debe dar rienda suelta a los sentimientos mas profundos del ser humano,por ej el arrepentimiento ante dios,por lo tanto caben rubatos y todo lo que desee el interprete siempre y cuando lo haga con buen gusto y técnica.

  • Unbelievable..this felt honest

  • never listen a sound so beautiful. The continuity of vibration is incredible. Some times it's much more like an organ than a piano. But it's very strange that no one talks about that

  • This piece reaches into the inner mind...and into the outer limits...

  • His rubato is masterful

  • @her0esfan if you think his rubato is masterful watch him playing chopin's op 64 no2

  • @her0esfan i actually think it's too much rubato. There is hardly any musical line throughout the piece to be heard. The original organ version sounds so much better to me (if, of course played on a beautiful organ by a master-organist)

  • it truly makes me cry. How could a man create such a world of truth and spirit? Those are more than feelings. It´s the human experience on earth. It will never stop touching our hearts because it´s simply part of us.

  • hey I accidentally gave your comment thumbs down- oops!! I meant thumbs up! Agree with you100%. This music - played that way - it gets to the deepest parts of you, and tells you that you are not alone...

  • It makes me cry too as many other music masterpieces ! I am inclined to believe that God need humans and we are not so separate .

  • @javierleonenriquez hes a great interpreter but the real genius is bach

  • Splendid way of playing. Many thanks

  • I've never heard this piece before. It's beautiful and I love this performance.

  • man this sounds so much like chopin!!!

  • the only common between chopin and bach is their intelligence in music and nothing more..they are sooo different..you can't say that..!:-O

  • @eloria1965 They are very different but it surprises me that Chopin played Bach every day.

  • as much as i love horowitz, you are indeed correct. It's more chopin than bach

  • It's not like Chopin, not really. It's Bach-Busoni... why do you need to compare it to Chopin? I can understand why some people wouldn't like it if you're hoping to hear Bach. For me, if it's taken at face value, I think it has a beauty that speaks for itself without the need for comparison to anything else.

  • What can one expect when the genious of J.S.Bach meets the genious of V.Horowitz? Perfection is the answer.

  • Great.

    Can somebody explain me how does he do the effect on second 43?

  • lift the pedal

  • @jdbarreryt

    Carefully executed pedaling on a piano with uneven damper regulation.

  • It's great that you could have spotted that moment of delicacy. I think it's the pedal.

  • Csodalatos zene,Bach mester a legnagyobb! Isteni.

  • "That was beautiful!" "I didn´t compose it..." hehehe. Nice.

  • While listening, you can feel: All suffering on earth will someday come to an end

  • @LAKJHSOIU shut the fuck up and listen

  • I feel the opposite, that it will continue in perpetuity.

  • I wrote many songs but no one among them sounds so great like this piece, thanks Great-Bach !

  • what's the bwv of the "track"?

    really really nice to listen several times... each one richer than the previous one.

  • BWV 659

  • ya lubluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu Bach

  • this comes from a very deep place. thank you, maestro.

  • ending smile is so pretty !

  • i love bach, bach i seviyorum, ich liebe bachhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !

  • Thanks for your most modest reply.

    By the way, I apologize if in my way to questioning was rude.

  • Busoni did lots of adaptations of J S Bach's works... Why you didn't have written the title at least to know what is it? Horowitz always gives the maximum of feeling, this perfomance is amazing!!

  • It is the Busoni transcription of the organ Chorale Prelude "Nun komm' der Heiden Heiland"

  • I just enjoy hear a disciplined musician

  • who was busoni?

  • Comment removed

  • Ferruccio Dante Michelangiolo Benvenuto Busoni (April 1, 1866 July 27, 1924) was an Italian composer, pianist, editor, writer, piano and composition teacher, and conductor. Among his composition students were Kurt Weill and Edgard Varèse. He was well regarded in his day as a virtuoso Pianist, especially in his playing of J S Bach (whom Busoni made transcriptions of Bach's organ music for Piano. Check out Wikipedia for a complete Bio.

  • Ferruccio Busoni, was a great pianist who composed some very good works, but made some astoudingly beautiful transcriptions of pieces especially Bach's works.

  • divine!

  • To mój ulubiony utwór !

  • it's one thing to speak your mind when you first hear the music. I have no problem with maybe one post. You didn't hear what you expected to hear, you're disappointed or annoyed, that's ok. Four posts means that you know this is not your favorite interpretation and you comment just to troll or such. Everyone has their own preferences, don't watch this video if you don't want to! Please!

  • no, it could be truncated to read:

    PLEASE! It's ok to say something negative about a recognized performer. But in simple words, there is no need to drive it in over and over again. You can say something negative, but from now on, please try to just avoid this video!

  • PhilipLu, you have to be aware: you are dealing with an extraordinarily mean, stupid and uneducated person(organman), whose goal is to upset people by posting his moronic comments. Don't play along. He has no real opinion - it is just a mischief

  • @88Woland You completely don't understand the person you are dealing with. Although he is intentionally inflammatory in his presentation, you have to understand that these interpretations are like cancer to many fans of Bach as they see them be seen as 'right' when they are drifting from Bach's vision. He is not a true troll and you have revealed yourself to be ignorant of a serious issue by disregarding his arguments, even as they are presented unfavorably.

  • @parquar I completely understand that this person and other similar to him("Bach fans", as you call them) are ignorant morons who think they know better than great masters such as Busoni and Horowitz. What they think is "Bach style" is stupid mid-XX century concoction which is easily devaluated just by reading C.P.E.Bach's " Versuch.." where interpretive matters of the period are dealt with by a master from the same period

  • @88Woland Busoni accurately arranged things and that is not what was being discussed, as I did not see any complaint about the arrangement or Busoni. Horowitz is a Romantic performer, interpreting things in ways that fulfill his personal tastes to the highest degree. Perpetual distortions of rhythm go beyond what many would appreciate in the context of the piece, and challenging that does not question his competence, but taste. With that said I enjoy listening to this

  • @parquar If you take the score in hand you will see that Horowitz follows what Busoni wrote with incredible precision. No distortions whatsoever. Music is very romantic art in general. There was a holy fire burning in Bach, and this is something that can not be understood by today's bland, business-like lawyers and accountants of music who call themselves "experts" when in fact they are only sterile impotents masked as artists and music lovers

  • @88Woland I honestly haven't looked at the Busoni score but I would assume he didn't change the rhythm of the lead voice as it enters. Horowitz just adds little delays and things here and there. 20 to 40 seconds in the video is full of it. If Busoni's transcription creates that difference please tell me but otherwise it just doesn't appear to be so.

  • @parquar I respect you. Please don't get upset with what follows. You are right- H. does add little delays and things here and there. That is called music. Music is not sheet paper- that was invented much later. Music is a living thing which can not be affixed to paper properly. If you think some black dots and few dynamic signs can explain the thing which shatters human soul, then you are wrong. Then we can dismiss Callas, Caruso, Gigli and all the great singers as well as Horowitz

  • I think in the first use it almost gives it a swing feel type of phase between the voices. When the changes get to 32nd note or more difference it starts bugging me a little. I would have just preferred small rubato that is even between voices but it doesn't really matter that much. Some irony:. even though Bach supposedly criticized the lack of sharpness in the upper registers on the pianos he tried (w/e kind), I find many of his works best on piano and he has imo the best compositions for it

  • It's OK

  • What the woeful one doesn't understand is that I am TIRED of mainstream acceptance of mediocrity, eccentricity, self-centeredness. I have a strange condition - I like to LISTEN to the MUSIC, not to the performance. If the performance happens to be wonderful, so much the better. If it is a mutilation, I am not interested. Dinu Lipatti PLAYS this piece. This man defaces and disfigures it. Literally every measure is a distortion, and completely inconsistent. This is a performance? Hardly.

  • alright, fag.

  • Organ, you never get tired from your monstrouos cretenism?You are the best example of arrogant, self-serving pompous fool I have ever encoutered. And there is a strong competition in the field

  • I hope my hands look that good at 80.

  • the only reply is that god is himself inside

  • hehe.. all these guys arguing who's the best... did you not learn your socrates ... there is no best it's all opinion.. these arguments have been pointless from the dawn of time! why can't we learn to quit arguing about things that have no right answer

    .. so stop arguing and enjoy the great music (in my opinion)

  • lol "i didnt compose it"

  • Splendid!!

  • Beautifull!!

  • Unbelievably great performance

  • and now, finally, proof that horowitz could only mannage a 10th (as liszt could).... look at 4:44, he has to change the whole hand position for it

  • Man,what's your point????? Anyone with just a little bit of sensitivity would agree that what has just happen was one of the most divine works ever written played in the most inspired way...

  • You are right!!!!

  • right i hope this puts the liszt quarrels to an end.

    im not denying what the written records say. but had horowitz lived and died in the liszt time without a cylinder tohis name, im sure the written accounts of his playing would set him up as a rival of liszt (as was said about tausig and rubinstein), and we would probably call horowitz one of the best in history(as he is and so many of us call him).yet there are still people bringing him down as superficial (as all performers can be).

  • It's almost as if he's talking, not playing.

  • Bach should be a Saint, and Horowitz I think he were one of the best artist in the piano.

  • God? is that you playing the piano?

  • 1:40-change of colour for that moment is extraordinary. It's the combination of overall sweep and telling details which is very hard to achieve.

  • It is a very good version. I prefer Sokolov's one, but this one indeed is marvelous too.

  • I visited H. and Wanda [Toscannini's Daughter] with Willie Kapell...Horowitz was VERY aloof, as he hated other pianists...[most Concert Artists do!!! Those windows faced E 94th street... Willie lived two doors to the East at 21 E 94th, and Ania Dorfman lived two doors to the East of Willie. An incredible neighborhood!

  • Serene

    thank you for posting this

  • 4:52

    :D

  • This music suggests to me a sensation of peace. Bach is really a great genius!

  • You can say it as high as you like!!!!! Totally agree! Bach is a genius in history!!

  • The slow tempo, the liberty in tone, colors, embellishments and articulation, the incredible rendition of the polyphonic lines... these are the qualities of a genius.. actually three geniuses are at work here, Bach, Busoni, and Horowitz... This is to me the true representation of the sense of great expectation for the Advent of Our Saviour...this really is for good-will people... thank you for posting this video (look at his fingering and posture, please!!)

  • Such a beautiful tone on the piano, and not flat and dull like so many piano recordings;

    this to me is a breath of fresh air

  • I admire Horowitz as a great pianist, and I have been fortunate to attend two of his last recitals in the mid eighties, which required queuing for many hours. But this Bach-Busoni is terribly misguided, he completely ruins the piece, or at least he follows Busoni in doing so. Listen to Lipatti for a tastefully adapted piano version.

  • I just listened to Lipatti's version, and also the original cantata excerpt. I think the Busoni adaptation already has as much to do with the original Bach as Adam Lambert's version of 'Ring of Fire' on this past season of American Idol had to do with Johnny Cash's original song. But that don't keep them from both being great. And, Horowitz's romanticism is truer to the Busoni transcription than Lipatti's baroqueness (and it's more fun).

  • This transcription is not from the cantata BWV 61, , but rather the Chorale Prelude BWV 659. If you listen to BWV 659, you'll see that Busoni's transcription is a great transcription. Busoni did a great job of keeping a lot of the original work while using the romanticism of his time to make it one of the greatest transcriptions for piano. I much prefer the original organ work, one of my all time favorites, but I love playing this on the piano. Nothing like Horowitz of course.

  • Thanks for clearing that up. Youtube is great, but it led me into that mistake of thinking bwv 61 was the cantata source (you do have to suspend belief to think 659 comes from 61). However, clicking around Youtube also led me originally to Horowitz's rendition, and I then downloaded the sheet music and, like you, am having tremendous fun playing it on piano. Like you, I only wish I could 'ruin' the piece like Horowitz does.

  • Actually, both the cantata BWV 61 and the Choral Prelude BWV 659 both come from the same hymn by Martin Luther. The hymn "Nun Komm der Heiden Heiland" is a hymn for Advent .

  • @ssint Where is the video of you playing this piece? I thought so. You have no clue what you're talking about. Horowitz was one the greatest pianists of the 20th century. He is in his 80s on this video and he does an amazing job. You're a moron by saying that "he completely ruins the piece" He plays it exactly like what Busoni wanted. Horowitz actually knew Busoni. I have an old LP from my grandma where Busoni himself plays this piece. Horowitz does this transcription justice.

  • solertinskis is right. This is e x t r e m e l y beautiful Bach (nice assist by Busoni). Faulting Horowitz on this interpretation is nutty. I love the look he gives the camera just after he finishes - priceless. Sure, the look says "wow, that was a lovely thing I just did", but he is right to be happy and proud.

  • You people are fucking idiots. This is beautiful.

  • way to make a point...

  • it's is certainly not the best of bach and also not the best of horowitz.

  • @hinno95. You're a retard. I seriously doubt you're qualified to judge what is considered "not the best of Bach". So what makes it "not the best of Bach"? Would you care to elaborate? You're probably too stupid to realize that what you are hearing on this video is a transcription of Bach's music by Busoni. You're listening to Busoni's transcription. The original was written for organ, which I do find more enjoyable. Nevertheless, this is a great transciption and a great performance.

  • Not Bach.

    Not Horowitz at his best.

    Rubato: robbed time (but aren't you supposed to pay it back?)

  • Self serving, as usual. o.O?

    wtf..that aint lang lang, it's horowitz

  • Not a good performance....points to Vlad more than it does the music. Self serving, as usual.

  • This real miracle! What amazing possession of a sound!

  • The beauty of the sound scape which Horowitz here makes is astonishing in it's absolute clarity. There is something particularly masterful about this performance.