Circumcision Increases Risk of HIV - Genital Mutilation Stops Now.

[ffgftfgrtedtjlpoiifd]

good video!

[forensicgirl]

Thank you for this very informative video.



[beelzmon]

I was circumcised as a baby...what can i do?

[TheYellowtulip]

@TheYellowtulip The foreskin has membrane skin but so does the inside of the urethra and circumcised men can catch HIV through the urethra as well, so circumcision is useless.

[TheYellowtulip]

@Cas77b Whatever you heard is a lie, the only way for HIV to enter the bloodstream is through a cut. Europe has only 5 % of circumcised men and more disease than USA.

[TheYellowtulip]

HIV doesn't get absorbed into skin unless there is a cut in it.

[Cas77b]

AIDS. 2006 Jul 13;20(11):1491-5.Potential HIV-1 target cells in the human penis.

CONCLUSIONS: Superficial Langerhans' cells on the inner aspect of the foreskin and frenulum are poorly protected by keratin and thus could play an important role in primary male infection. These findings provide a possible anatomical explanation for the epidemiologically observed protective effect of male circumcision.

[Cas77b]

@TheYellowtulip HIV has been demonstrated to pass through the foreskin in the lab. How to approach transmission is important. The other chance is by fungal infections that are breaks in the foreskin skin. Either way aid is being directed to circumcise in Africa.

[TheYellowtulip]

I meant to say less disease than USA.

[Cas77b]

Circumcising will yield a 60% protection from HIV for hetero sexual men. Although transportation through the foreskin is certain via DC-SIGN in Cells, transmission may be a mater of exposure time so “clean it or cut it” should be “cut it and clean it“. The chances of a urethra exposure multiply less likely to result in infection, but not unthinkable for both cut and uncut.

[Cas77b]

@TheYellowtulip Google “BMJ 2000;320:1592-1594 ( 10 June )”

“Langerhans cells Wikapedia”

“DC-SIGN cells Wikapedia”

I noticed this debate for decades and after over twenty years and over 40 studies circumcision is only now being adopted as international HIV policy. How many of the 50 million could have been saved?

[Cas77b]

DC-SIGN cells are also venerable to some fungal attacks, so the question is are they more susceptible to HIV when these cells have micro fungal infections. In other words someone may have no sign that they have an opening to HIV through DC-SIGN cells.

[gamerchamp4000]

@Cas77b Cutting the foreskin off shouldn't be an option. Even in the absurd scenario where circumcision was actually proven to prevent HIV, it's not an ethical option. It never was. It should never have been instituted in the first place. But never mind all that. This HIV lie is the straw that broke the camel's back. The anti-circ movement is becoming main stream, and rightfully so.

[Cas77b]

@gamerchamp4000 Google “circumcision and CDC” and “circumcision and Bono” circumcision is official aid policy to Africa. This has always been a health issue that is why it has been done for over 4,000 years. We have a 60 trillion dollar infrastructure to bring water to everyone. Africa is not going to become like Europe. Neither are we if we don’t teach clean it first. 

[mediaoverloadbillion]

@Cas77b You seem obsessed with this notion of "cleaning it". That was clearly drilled so hard into your head and why either you or your children (or both) were sexually mutilated. The sad truth is that it's a non-issue. There's no more complexity to cleaning this part of your body than cleaning your belly, face, ears, or nose. It's a lie that has been used to validate this weird ritual based in religion and sexual oppression. I hope one day you're able to see it for what it truly is. 

[mediaoverloadbillion]

@Cas77b In regards to Africa, this is a gross exploitation of these people to validate the practice on such a deep and disturbing level, it shows the extent that people like yourself will go to justify it. We're well aware the CDC still holds that male genital mutilation is ethical. We're well aware of the proposed "science" to prove circumcision reduces HIV. The emphasis on circumcision in Africa is rooted in preserving medical justification, and the data is flawed. It's a goof.

[Cas77b]

Country,% infected circumcised Men, % infected uncircumcised men: Major Lakes

Cameroon --4.1cir 1.1n-cir Lakes: Lagdo, Mbakaou, Chad, Dejerem, Sanaga

Gana-- 1.6cir 1.4n-cir Lake Valta, bui

Lesotho-- 22.8cir 15.2n-cir

Malawi-- 13.2cir 9.5n-cir Lakes: Nyasa

Rwanda-- 3.5cir 2.1n-cir Lakes: Kivu, Cohaha, Bulera, Ihema, Rweru

Swaziland-- 21.8cir 19.5n-cir

Tanzania-- 6.5cir 5.6n-cir Lakes: Nyasa, Victoria, Tanganyika, Malawi

[handsom1d]

The Government says they do NOT want to get involved? They got Involved to put a World Wide ban on female circumcision did'nt they! What I don't have the same rights to be protected? Every Video you have done has been great and so true! Thanks so much for standing up and speaking out for all of us Men and boys!

[mediaoverloadbillion]

@Cas77b "More moisture left in the glands is an opportunity for fungal infection that are open wounds for HIV and other STD infections to take hold." -Garbage science. You're more likely to contract HIV from the increased friction during intercourse caused by circumcision. The African HIV justification of circumcision is a gross act of exploitation of a third world people to promote a religious blood sacrifice. The veil is wearing thin. Take your genital mutilation and shove it.

[TheYellowtulip]

That's absolutely right. With my ex cut bf I was always sore for a whole week after all that unnatural friction. I had burning in my clitoris and inside from all the rough banging on it. Cut men can try to be more gentle but they are sacrificing their own pleasure by trying to do that. An uncut guy can move as fast as he wants and it will feel normal and never causes burning or soreness. Even a small cut penis causes friction and soreness unless the vagina is very loose.

[TheYellowtulip]

The lotion companies will sure make millions from the circumcised men trying to jerk off without their foreskin.

[thejooch]

I MISS MY PENIS SKIN THANKS ALOT JESUS

[Bonobo3D]

I can attest to the damage circumcision does and the increased risk of std's is a circumcised male. I was cut so tightly as an infant that regular sexual activity in my youth resulted in chaffing of the remaining tight penile skin. My shaft skin was often chaffed to the point of raw. Wounded skin is a portal to germs and infection.

Foreskin restoration has helped considerably.

[Bonobo3D]

Excellent. Wonderful to hear the truth spoken so clearly!

[zuditaka]

Thanks for doing all this, and putting all these useful links up!

[TheYellowtulip]

Keep babies safe by not circumcising them. The skin doesn't retract until a certain age for a reason to protect the penis from infections and germs. When the boy becomes an adult, the foreskin retracts and can be washed the same way a circumcised penis is washed. A circumcised penis is just as likely to contract HIV because the virus can enter the opening of the penis which has mucous membrane skin.

[skatolero]

Great info! I didn't know that a circ'ed man had more risks of acquiring HIV. Covenant with God my ***! That's what religion do: alienate the minds of people. Education is a must. People must think by themselves and start being less naive.

Man, you're doing it on purpose, ha, "unnatural" is a better word instead of "handicapped". 2 times! Come on don't be so harsh!

Really great info. Thanx. Do more vids!

Regards.

[TheChallenger2011]

Removed infant foreskin is also used for skin grafting products

Google "APLIGRAF" - it is one of the companies that profits from the infants tissue

Of course burn victims are in need of such treatment, HOWEVER there is NO justification for robbing a child of a body part without consent.

Great work on these videos! Look forward to more!!

[handsom1d]

why won't this let me post

[TucsonDave111]

Great video. Thanks for spreading the word.

[BiggestOfDaddies]

The part that many seem to gloss over is that the foreskin serves a utility as well, in that it eliminates the need for foreign lubrication during intercourse.

[freedom0speech]

"The Reason for circumcision is to bring about a decrease in sexual intercourse and a weakening of the organ in question, so that this activity be diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible. The bodily pain caused to that member is the real purpose of circumcision. Violent concupiscence and lust that goes beyond what is needed are diminished."

------------------------------­------------------------------­---

Moses Maimonides (Rabbi, Philosopher, Scholar, Physician) 1135-1204 AD