I really don't agree with the statement that we're all doing the best we can to develop our consciousness. I've encountered plenty of pyschopathic people who are fully aware of how malignant they are to themselves and the world around them but just don't care. One individual I've known since we were kids has always very much enjoyed influencing people to degrade their own minds and character, and has told me outright that she's deliberately making herself worse.
I don't think it makes any sense to consider such evil beings to have the same intrinsic worth as individuals who're of a benign nature. If the quality of a being is negative and tends only towards the negative then, by definition, they are inherently *less* than worthless =/
Getting Closer -> Check this out: "gnuplot animation video 002 - double slit experiment" on youtube. Photons behaving like a waveform. @twcjr44 Do I understand this correctly - that if the results were not recorded (and therefore made historically verifiable) instead of a waveform diffraction pattern we would see the photons accumulting on the receptor in two separate pilars?
Following "Youngs Double Slit Experiment (How to do it at home)" -> laser beam .5mm slits in tin foil using scapel. 1) One slit confirms light behaving like a waveform on par with liquid waveforms. 2) 2nd slit light behaving like a waveform with primary and secondary cancellations. Result: Confirmed light behaves like a waveform. Next: to confirm Tom's theory: will require cathode ray tube accelerator and a means to measure & record photon entering slits - would a 16mhz microchip do the job?
The explanation of the double-slit experiment Tom brings forth holds up to logic. If the information that data can change "magically" of its own accord is true.. you can no longer interpret reality according to current scientific precepts. The photon accelerators found in cathode ray tubes in old tv sets and oscilloscopes can be used to verify this right? Does anybody have information on how to replicate this experiment?
In this cartoon vid elsewhere on youtube "Dr Quantum - Double Slit Experiment" while the vid is helpful, the makers of the vid have not understood the implications of the experiment. 1) That data is altered (magically) of its own accord depending upon whether it is historically verifiable or not. 2) A rule exists paranormally governing this reality that cannot be justified or explained by any know "measurable" quantity in this reality.
Regarding the double slit experiment: it seems a timeline of events would be a better way to explain the relevant result - That information changed magically "of its own accord" the instant it became historically verifiable or not. This reminds of the movie "back to the future" where in future images of people would dissapear from photos when he altered past events ie, his mother marries someone else. Is this correct?
"If you don't gather your own data learn your own lessons all your left with is belief and faith and neither can evolve the quality of your consciousness...".. I love this guy!!
if time is constant (i dont believe it by the way) how do you explain interstellar travel through the milky way? do you believe that their speed is limited by the speed of light being constant?
Consciousness can travel from place to place throughout galaxy in an instant, while virtual matter ("physical mass") from within this virtual reality (our universe), is limited to travel at something less than c (speed of light) as it moves within the virtual reality because c is as fast as virtual information can "physically" travel through that virtual "physical" reality. Yes, virtual beings are limited to c within their virtual reality.
Dr. Campbell I have a question, when the photons are collected in collectors 1 and 2, are they recorded in the coincident counter the same way as when the photons are collected from collectors 3 and 4? In which step of the collection process are the results erased?
@twcjr44 Thank you very much for your time Dr. Campbell. Am I correct in my understanding that the idler photon is 'erased' before it is recorded by any collector? Where does the idler "go" when it is erased? How can we know that (a) the process of recording the idle photon is not disrupting the wave property and (b) the delayed choice is experiment is valid when dealing with entangled pairs? After all, isn't the pattern only observed after the idler is either recorded or "erased"?
Discreet electrons passing through the double-slit barrier and creating an interference pattern in and of itself is bizarre enough. Is it not a hasty leap to call that a "probability distribution"? What about it is "probable?" Seems like discreet chunks would probably show us two target points, not a wave pattern. Wouldn't calling it a "probability distribution" forcing a false premise to work your way backwards on? What is the definition of "probable" in this context?
Bohr, heisenberg, Schrodinger ant the rest simply assumed out of thin air a probability distribution because that was the only assumption that logically (mathematically) worked (i.e., enabled them to predict experimental outcomes correctly. MBT logically derives that assumption from the mechanics of how the virtual reality works.
Dr. Campbell I have a question, in the 3rd scenario where physicist B has 100 snapshots of the data, why is it that not even at least one of the results is light behaving as a particle after burning the envelopes containing detector data? I know that you said that it appears as if he just has 100 snapshots of the one result, but if everyone is seemingly conscious of the fact that it is 100 snapshots of the same result, wouldn't at least one of them come out as light as a particle?
Because the photos are not marked in any way, there is no objective proof that the photo has anything to do with the experimental results contained in the envelopes -- which all appeared to be still locked in the safe untouched.
"Open-minded skeptism" is a figure of speech that's combining contradictory terms. An oxymoron of the literal type, which is a paradoxical impossibility.
I also made an inadvertent oxymoron. :) Can your critical reasoning skills find it?
This is one of the best explanations of the double-slit phenomenon I heard. It is at about 45 minutes into it. He shows the enigma that was discovered by the addition of information and the collapse of the wave function. He is saying that the availability of information is collapsing the wave function not consciousness nor measurement.
Mr. Campbell does mention "love" in a poetic manner that is monistic in scope in that it does not show any correlations for finding the biological expression of a difficult to measure feeling and an external (even in Hilbert space) or quantum measurable or expressible process. He presents it tautologically and it seems he is seeking for it to be accepted poetically but somehow we are to believe it is used in an empirical manner.
@twcjr44 Question? In Special Relativity we have the constancy of the speed of light. Is there a contradiction between this and the Blue Shift, Red Shift of the Doppler Effect where the frequency of visible light changes due to the motion of a Star away from us? If wave length can be stretched of contraction due to motion of a light source is this not a change in the speed of wave length?
No. All light, no matter what the frequency travels at the same speed. As frequency goes up, wavelength goes down by the same factor so that wavelength times frequency is a constant
@twcjr44 Thanks. I appreciate all that you are doing. I do wonder how the script/simulation map and individual and collective consciousness merge together. It seems that we do determine small things with our consciousness, but there is a larger reality that we are born into, that we have little control over.
Yes, that is called our individual and collective environments -- it is interactive and contains both other people and lots of stuff and is constantly changing -- it limits, shapes, our choices. Our job is ti simply deal with it (with whatever limited choices we have) in such a way that we raise the quality of our consciousness. This is an interactive multiplayer game with challenging opportunities to choose wisely from whatever choices we have.
Thank you for sharing this fascinating information. It has changed my perspective of my life instantaneously. I would like to pose a question if I may. Regarding the photon dbl slit experiment... is it possiblt that the photons themselves are conscious energy forms, and that in fact, it was the photon itself that detected the detector, hence changing its behavior? Where the photons, for lack of a better word, assuming that the intent of the detectors was to have them hit the same spot continuos
Apologies in advance. Im still quite new this all of this. I have clinical depression such as chem imbalance. If I can get out of body, will I feel diff at all? And would I be able to heal myself? , Iv been trying to learn how to go out of body but havnt had much success. if anyone could point me in the right direction to some good RELIABLE book, videos or other sources on this subject it would be very appreciated. Thanks!!!
In the discussion on the information of a quantum experiment being available; if a person views the data of the experiment and then destroys the data, but retains it in their memory, the results exist physically but the data only exists in a person's memory. Is this equivalent to the example you gave of the data being held on a video recorder, and therefore we get the collapsed probability wave?
The result you wonder about falls in a grey area that may depend on the credibility of the man. The question is: is the data available within the PMR VR because it is in the mans memory. Does he have a photographic memory, or alheimers? Would a lie detector test be enough to verify he was tellling the truth? No, Individual human memory content is subjective and just available to that individule human, while video/audio memory on a recorder is objective and available to ayone.
@JigglesJingle I think Mr Campbell was saying that if you connect the dots for a given situation and view it as a conspiracy, then that situation can become real to your reality. His point is that reality is subjective. All conspiracies are real and not real at the same time, because reality is multidimensional. Your focus of expectation and intention can collapse the wave function of a probability of a given dimension of reality.
at 1:50:35 on the powerpoint slide you can see the words "we can not directly share experiences" ... that is subjective to states of consciousness though, right? Two people in an altered state can directly share experience through things like OOB, synesthesia etc?
Tow or more can share an event, but each will experience something different. Vary similar perhaps, but still different. All experience is individual since each individual must uniquely interpret their uniqie datastream based on their unique experience. When several people have very similar experience, fear, beiefs, etc, they may also have very similar experiences of a given event. No two individuals are identicle in their experience or their quality of consciousness.
This was probably my favorite video yet. Went really deep into the double slit, quantum mechanics, and relativity, and how they relate to a VR model. I am starting to grasp this stuff after three years of studying, and Every time i see the double slit explained i understand it more and more. looking forward to 2 and 3!
this guy is obsessed w einstein
hellodiane 6 days ago
Comment removed
Illuminatihater 1 month ago
this is brain sex
christic1978 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I really don't agree with the statement that we're all doing the best we can to develop our consciousness. I've encountered plenty of pyschopathic people who are fully aware of how malignant they are to themselves and the world around them but just don't care. One individual I've known since we were kids has always very much enjoyed influencing people to degrade their own minds and character, and has told me outright that she's deliberately making herself worse.
EternalFuu 1 month ago
I don't think it makes any sense to consider such evil beings to have the same intrinsic worth as individuals who're of a benign nature. If the quality of a being is negative and tends only towards the negative then, by definition, they are inherently *less* than worthless =/
EternalFuu 1 month ago
Comment removed
EternalFuu 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Getting Closer -> Check this out: "gnuplot animation video 002 - double slit experiment" on youtube. Photons behaving like a waveform. @twcjr44 Do I understand this correctly - that if the results were not recorded (and therefore made historically verifiable) instead of a waveform diffraction pattern we would see the photons accumulting on the receptor in two separate pilars?
mrCbeems 1 month ago
Comment removed
mrCbeems 1 month ago
Following "Youngs Double Slit Experiment (How to do it at home)" -> laser beam .5mm slits in tin foil using scapel. 1) One slit confirms light behaving like a waveform on par with liquid waveforms. 2) 2nd slit light behaving like a waveform with primary and secondary cancellations. Result: Confirmed light behaves like a waveform. Next: to confirm Tom's theory: will require cathode ray tube accelerator and a means to measure & record photon entering slits - would a 16mhz microchip do the job?
mrCbeems 1 month ago
The explanation of the double-slit experiment Tom brings forth holds up to logic. If the information that data can change "magically" of its own accord is true.. you can no longer interpret reality according to current scientific precepts. The photon accelerators found in cathode ray tubes in old tv sets and oscilloscopes can be used to verify this right? Does anybody have information on how to replicate this experiment?
mrCbeems 1 month ago
In this cartoon vid elsewhere on youtube "Dr Quantum - Double Slit Experiment" while the vid is helpful, the makers of the vid have not understood the implications of the experiment. 1) That data is altered (magically) of its own accord depending upon whether it is historically verifiable or not. 2) A rule exists paranormally governing this reality that cannot be justified or explained by any know "measurable" quantity in this reality.
mrCbeems 1 month ago
Regarding the double slit experiment: it seems a timeline of events would be a better way to explain the relevant result - That information changed magically "of its own accord" the instant it became historically verifiable or not. This reminds of the movie "back to the future" where in future images of people would dissapear from photos when he altered past events ie, his mother marries someone else. Is this correct?
mrCbeems 1 month ago
Comment removed
mrCbeems 1 month ago
"If you don't gather your own data learn your own lessons all your left with is belief and faith and neither can evolve the quality of your consciousness...".. I love this guy!!
AvaLaveer 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos 2
very interesting. one queastion to tom ...
if time is constant (i dont believe it by the way) how do you explain interstellar travel through the milky way? do you believe that their speed is limited by the speed of light being constant?
then it would take a long time to get here !
thetransformationnow 1 month ago
@thetransformationnow.
Consciousness can travel from place to place throughout galaxy in an instant, while virtual matter ("physical mass") from within this virtual reality (our universe), is limited to travel at something less than c (speed of light) as it moves within the virtual reality because c is as fast as virtual information can "physically" travel through that virtual "physical" reality. Yes, virtual beings are limited to c within their virtual reality.
twcjr44 1 month ago
Dr. Campbell I have a question, when the photons are collected in collectors 1 and 2, are they recorded in the coincident counter the same way as when the photons are collected from collectors 3 and 4? In which step of the collection process are the results erased?
Thanks in advance,
J
bofumytofu 1 month ago
@bofumytofu,
Yes they are. "Wichway" information is lost (erased) when signals reach th beam splitting mirrors that preceed dectors 1 and 2.
twcjr44 1 month ago
@twcjr44 Thank you very much for your time Dr. Campbell. Am I correct in my understanding that the idler photon is 'erased' before it is recorded by any collector? Where does the idler "go" when it is erased? How can we know that (a) the process of recording the idle photon is not disrupting the wave property and (b) the delayed choice is experiment is valid when dealing with entangled pairs? After all, isn't the pattern only observed after the idler is either recorded or "erased"?
bofumytofu 1 month ago
Discreet electrons passing through the double-slit barrier and creating an interference pattern in and of itself is bizarre enough. Is it not a hasty leap to call that a "probability distribution"? What about it is "probable?" Seems like discreet chunks would probably show us two target points, not a wave pattern. Wouldn't calling it a "probability distribution" forcing a false premise to work your way backwards on? What is the definition of "probable" in this context?
marce11o 1 month ago
@marce11o,
Bohr, heisenberg, Schrodinger ant the rest simply assumed out of thin air a probability distribution because that was the only assumption that logically (mathematically) worked (i.e., enabled them to predict experimental outcomes correctly. MBT logically derives that assumption from the mechanics of how the virtual reality works.
twcjr44 1 month ago
@twcjr44 when you say "assumed out of thin air" does that equate to saying "assumed with no reason or justification"?
marce11o 1 month ago
Dr. Campbell I have a question, in the 3rd scenario where physicist B has 100 snapshots of the data, why is it that not even at least one of the results is light behaving as a particle after burning the envelopes containing detector data? I know that you said that it appears as if he just has 100 snapshots of the one result, but if everyone is seemingly conscious of the fact that it is 100 snapshots of the same result, wouldn't at least one of them come out as light as a particle?
novan08 2 months ago
@novan08,
Because the photos are not marked in any way, there is no objective proof that the photo has anything to do with the experimental results contained in the envelopes -- which all appeared to be still locked in the safe untouched.
twcjr44 2 months ago
Tom campbell should use Minecraft for his metaphore, It would fit better than World of warcraft.
rx327prime 2 months ago
"Open-minded skeptism" is a figure of speech that's combining contradictory terms. An oxymoron of the literal type, which is a paradoxical impossibility.
I also made an inadvertent oxymoron. :) Can your critical reasoning skills find it?
Jeorney 2 months ago in playlist Astrotheology
This is one of the best explanations of the double-slit phenomenon I heard. It is at about 45 minutes into it. He shows the enigma that was discovered by the addition of information and the collapse of the wave function. He is saying that the availability of information is collapsing the wave function not consciousness nor measurement.
TheFmueller 2 months ago
Mr. Campbell does mention "love" in a poetic manner that is monistic in scope in that it does not show any correlations for finding the biological expression of a difficult to measure feeling and an external (even in Hilbert space) or quantum measurable or expressible process. He presents it tautologically and it seems he is seeking for it to be accepted poetically but somehow we are to believe it is used in an empirical manner.
TheFmueller 2 months ago
EXTREMELY FASHINATING!!!!!!
whey80 2 months ago
@twcjr44 Question? In Special Relativity we have the constancy of the speed of light. Is there a contradiction between this and the Blue Shift, Red Shift of the Doppler Effect where the frequency of visible light changes due to the motion of a Star away from us? If wave length can be stretched of contraction due to motion of a light source is this not a change in the speed of wave length?
TheWillwillwill 2 months ago in playlist Astrotheology
@TheWillwillwill,
No. All light, no matter what the frequency travels at the same speed. As frequency goes up, wavelength goes down by the same factor so that wavelength times frequency is a constant
twcjr44 2 months ago
@twcjr44 Thanks. I appreciate all that you are doing. I do wonder how the script/simulation map and individual and collective consciousness merge together. It seems that we do determine small things with our consciousness, but there is a larger reality that we are born into, that we have little control over.
TheWillwillwill 2 months ago
@TheWillwillwill,
Yes, that is called our individual and collective environments -- it is interactive and contains both other people and lots of stuff and is constantly changing -- it limits, shapes, our choices. Our job is ti simply deal with it (with whatever limited choices we have) in such a way that we raise the quality of our consciousness. This is an interactive multiplayer game with challenging opportunities to choose wisely from whatever choices we have.
twcjr44 2 months ago
Thank you for sharing this fascinating information. It has changed my perspective of my life instantaneously. I would like to pose a question if I may. Regarding the photon dbl slit experiment... is it possiblt that the photons themselves are conscious energy forms, and that in fact, it was the photon itself that detected the detector, hence changing its behavior? Where the photons, for lack of a better word, assuming that the intent of the detectors was to have them hit the same spot continuos
cfnapoli 3 months ago
Apologies in advance. Im still quite new this all of this. I have clinical depression such as chem imbalance. If I can get out of body, will I feel diff at all? And would I be able to heal myself? , Iv been trying to learn how to go out of body but havnt had much success. if anyone could point me in the right direction to some good RELIABLE book, videos or other sources on this subject it would be very appreciated. Thanks!!!
th0m3s100 3 months ago
In the discussion on the information of a quantum experiment being available; if a person views the data of the experiment and then destroys the data, but retains it in their memory, the results exist physically but the data only exists in a person's memory. Is this equivalent to the example you gave of the data being held on a video recorder, and therefore we get the collapsed probability wave?
pgeeme 3 months ago
@pgeeme So it's the consciousness viewing the data that is significant, and collapses the probability wave. Not merely the existence of the data.
pgeeme 3 months ago
@pgeeme,
The result you wonder about falls in a grey area that may depend on the credibility of the man. The question is: is the data available within the PMR VR because it is in the mans memory. Does he have a photographic memory, or alheimers? Would a lie detector test be enough to verify he was tellling the truth? No, Individual human memory content is subjective and just available to that individule human, while video/audio memory on a recorder is objective and available to ayone.
twcjr44 3 months ago
What a idiot "conspiracies aren't reality" lol !
JigglesJingle 3 months ago
@JigglesJingle I think Mr Campbell was saying that if you connect the dots for a given situation and view it as a conspiracy, then that situation can become real to your reality. His point is that reality is subjective. All conspiracies are real and not real at the same time, because reality is multidimensional. Your focus of expectation and intention can collapse the wave function of a probability of a given dimension of reality.
TheWillwillwill 2 months ago in playlist Astrotheology
I do have one question,
at 1:50:35 on the powerpoint slide you can see the words "we can not directly share experiences" ... that is subjective to states of consciousness though, right? Two people in an altered state can directly share experience through things like OOB, synesthesia etc?
HueyTheDoctor87 3 months ago
@HueyTheDoctor87,
Tow or more can share an event, but each will experience something different. Vary similar perhaps, but still different. All experience is individual since each individual must uniquely interpret their uniqie datastream based on their unique experience. When several people have very similar experience, fear, beiefs, etc, they may also have very similar experiences of a given event. No two individuals are identicle in their experience or their quality of consciousness.
twcjr44 3 months ago
Thanks for posting
whitegirlblue 3 months ago
Always a joy to see another update. Thanks.
infinitesimotel 3 months ago
Looking forward to the next two parts!! Thanks!!!
melodyscottzindell 3 months ago
This was probably my favorite video yet. Went really deep into the double slit, quantum mechanics, and relativity, and how they relate to a VR model. I am starting to grasp this stuff after three years of studying, and Every time i see the double slit explained i understand it more and more. looking forward to 2 and 3!
mcarbone80 3 months ago
Thanks Tom
Keep pouring on the info, its starting to soak in.
tmcmahen 3 months ago 2
Great video, thank you for sharing!! When will you post part 2/3 and 3/3 ... ?
me78ish 3 months ago
this makes my day! looking forward diving into this...thank you Tom!
discretiona 3 months ago