this movie looks pretty fun, based on evolution vs. creation, I like the fact that just 2 brothers made the entire thing, called EVOLUTION CREEK, look it up!
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
@Mogley52 From your article "Not all evolutionists even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. "
This is a laugh because Biologists are actually very consistent about what species a fossil belongs to. Creationists on the other hand will claim a bone is a human with rickets one day and a chimpanzee the next. Same creationist and same bone.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
@Mogley52 " Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator"
And Newton believed you could turn lead into gold. Luckily science is about what you can prove, not random opinions from "big scientists".
@Mogley52 "The supernatural cannot be proved by science "
Neither can Leprechauns, and for the exact same reason.
"science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe"
Your inability to come up with another option is not "scientific evidence", all you are doing is using special pleading because your faulty reasoning led you to an infinite regress. That is the exact opposite of science.
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
@Mogley52 Your article commits the fallacy of Ex Post Facto statistics and Special Pleading in the first 2 paragraphs.Also the protein molecule argument was proved false experimentally in 2009. How about making your own arguments as opposed to hoping some lame creationist website is arguing correctly even if you obviously don't understand it.
@Mogley52 "NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). "
I want an actual definition of "kinds" so that when you make this claim I can show Evolution by Natural Selection is predictive and creationism is silly.
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation. Also read my Internet article, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH! According to a Newsweek article quoting a NASA scientist, in the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (now meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil.
@Mogley52 "Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. "
This is an assertion without evidence, and it also poses a problem for your God who would have had to come into existence from nothing. The cosmological argument is just a mass of special pleading.
Bible = fairytales. I would believe the story of Jack and the bean stalk before I would believe anything out of the bible - although there are some very entertaining stories there - lots of brutality; death, violence, destruction, torment, torture, prostitution - just open up to the book of Joshua for starters and go from there.
I love how Howard Stern understands the separation between church & state (Thomas Jefferson's term for the 1st amendment establishment clause). It's consistent with his libertarianism. I like how he has no patience with religious nut jobs who want to duble talk us into watering down our science standards. This was fun to listen to.
As a Biology teacher, in the southern USA, I will create a shitstorm if any administrator tries to drag religion or holy book crap into my curriculum. If you are a science teacher and opine in your class or bring in religious dogma, you need to resign. Go teach Sunday school. Science pwns ANY holy book and puts it where it belongs, in your church. Do not bring it into my classroom.
I agree w/ Howard , but he went at it just like the wack job creationist fools do. Preach preach ! Just state the facts and b done.
I guess he was in a billoinaire fit at the time.
How dare u disagree with the all mighty pissed off boff ! Howard ! Let them disagree and make fools out of themselves. Sounds like Beth got a new pair of glasses and didn't want to have sex with the sexy stern. Waaah.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Evolution doesn't directly say that there is no deity. It simply states how life was formed which, while supported by fact, directly opposes the book of genesis. You can believe in both, but you gotta be more flexible than a brick wall to think for your self. The sad truth is, churches and such won't allow any deviation from their scriptures whatsoever. It's entirely possible to be theistic as well as an evolutionist.
@Mogley52 Science doesn't point toward any supernatural intelligence. It just deals with evidence for natural phenomena. Philosophers and theologians can use the findings of science to back up their own world views. but science is neutral on questions about the supernatural. Understand the difference.
@Mogley52 Science doesn't point toward any supernatural intelligence. It just deals with evidence for natural phenomena. Philosophers and theologians can use the findings of science to back up their own world views. but science is neutral on questions about the supernatural. Understand the difference.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
@jimu57 Somebody has some fucking self esteem issues. if you weremreally as smart as you say you are you wouldnt feel the need to validate yourself on youtube. Go back and hide in your basement.
The whole world is laughing at America and this whole anti-science creationist rubbish.
If the creationists get their way, then surely ALL religious creationism must be taught, including the Hindu version which involves a giant inter-galactic space-turtle creating the earth.....
This is such a dumb discussion. Too bad Howard got roped into it. It's fairly simple, teach reality, and let the mythology people discuss it on their own time. We don't teach our students about Zeus or Odin, so there is no reason to teach about Allah or Yahweh.
Why is everyone arguing.. Each to their own.. I'm a Muslim and I believe this beautiful universe and everything in is a creation, not from random events but from a creator.. Religion is a way if life..science is a took for understanding.. Religion shows us how to live along side one another.. The reality is we will all go to the grave.. Prepare for that!!!
Howard, dont use the word "creation." There are these fucking idiots around who believe in creationism, and they hear just that word and think they´ve won the argument right there.
I dont even know why ppl bother arguing over it either way. Everyone thinks there beliefs are the right way and will never change, so why even bother.
Would be nice if ppl were as worried about getting jobs, taking care of thier kids and paying there rent instead of things that dont help either way.
Wow, I can't believe how many people don't stop and think. Do you feel smart when you tell a creationist that your great grandfather was a monkey? I don't have any monkeys in my family tree. Perhaps you inherited your common sense from apes your ancestors were f*cking? I think that is a far more likely theory than evolution.
I strongly disagreed with Stern and thought he was full of shit and just a shock jock based on what he's done in the past with Selena and some of the other juvenile rants when he was on radio. Or at least what gave him publicity.
I never understand why anyone would listen to him.
I've now listened to several clips on YouTube and find that he has far more dept then what I once thought and find him very interesting.
He seems to be talking honestly and has the guts to speak him mind.
@MrHoolits Interesting comment; Glad to hear you gave him a listen. I think most peoples opinion of Stern would change if they actually heard more of his radio show.
@AtheistsThinkMore, I am not a fan or like any kind of shock jock type stuff and I've heard some of his earlier work and in my opinion is made for titillation and sometimes reaches for the lowest common denominator though I have a only have a little to go by.
His recent work, again in my opinion, seems more mature and has much more substance. I enjoyed his conversations with American Patriot Jesse Ventura.
What I do like from what I hear is someone who is honest & not to full of themselves.
How did something come from ABSOLUTE nothing in the first place? The only answer is God. Science doesn't have one. If everything did come from nothing, why doesn't something just return to nothing again? Why aren't there more big-bang like events?
Look, no matter what you subscribe to, you're left with the horribly awesome concept of something literally coming from nothing. If you think God did it all, then God is that something. If you think it's all chaos (and even if there is an endless cycle of universes starting and ending), we're still left with something - this endless cycle, the potential for this, etc. coming from nothing. We can't escape this and this is MIND blowing.
when creationists provide all Scientific proof and evidence that completely challenge the stupid evolution...jerks like howad would scream "is not science"!!!
@mrtriplewinner : You have to be trolling. Nobody can be as stupid as that. Damn you would have to be skullfucked untill your whole brain is whipped in to bloody pulp before you could fall for creationist propaganda.
The theory correctly predicted that our sun must have some way to produce energy for billions of years. DNA "boiling point" temperatures, nicely match the tree of life that was a part of the theory
Evolution is older than relativity and has never been falsified, even though it would be extremely easy to do, were it false. Relativity breaks down on very tiny scales, and when the mass is very large
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Popular Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Sexuality is not just for reproduction. There are reasons why the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Scripture teaches we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be spiritual joy as well as pleasures in heaven.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE, because of entropy, could not have sustained itself eternally. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ANY REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article that examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of both transitional forms and lack of sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
@cucamongafreddy I thought it was just willful ignorance for a while, but this shit has gone on so long now that I'm thinking you might be right. Maybe they really, truly, honestly do not possess the mental faculties they need.
And I think the most accepted theory by scientists as to how the dinosaurs went extinct is that a comet or asteroid crashed into earth. We have evidence of an asteroid or comet impact on the coast of the Yucatan Peninsula. It is a crater. Now the size of the crater shows that the impact would have caused a global catastrophe. If humans have existed since Adam and Eve like fundamentalists Christians believe. How would they have survived?
Imagine a fish with part fins, part feet with fins evolving into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible in nature (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). Species couldn't have survived while their vital tissues, organs, biological systems were still evolving. Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weeb¬ly.com
@mnickles89 Wrong. The second law of thermodynamics only applies in a closed system where no matter or energy leaves or enters. Earth is NOT a closed system therefore the 2nd rule of thermodynamics doesn't apply, meaning your argument fails on all levels.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ok Howard, then tell me where all matter and early life came from? EVOLUTION means change. What changes? Something. Where did something comes from? You cannot evolve from nothing.
@lanebaguss14 You must have the same IQ as Stern, somewhere around room temperature. Its dickless wonders like you that waste bandwidth and oxygen. Try readin a little. Or better yet, go to college and study science like me. hamster fucking hag!
@jimu57 You can't evolve from nothing... you just sound stupid. You're not right and i'm not right. Don't say because you study science, that makes your "you cant evolve from nothing" theory true. Don't get all upset over a youtube post...
@jimu57 EVOLUTION is the study of natural selection. ABIOGENESIS is the study of how biological life arises. Is it willful ignorance or a genuinely low IQ that makes people refuse to understand that there is a difference? Just because you religious folks don't understand how to use a hammer doesn't mean that you should try to prevent everybody else (who knows what a hammer is and how it should be used) from doing so.
@M0US3P0T4TO I have considerable knowledge in evolution and also abiogenesis. I learned it in COLLEGE and research. I haev a rather high IQ. I am a christian, not a religionist. I probably know more about abiogenesis that you will ever know, so dont throw out words that you know nothing about. our defintion of abiogenesis is very elementary. Makes me realize you know nothing about it. Dont waste my time with your small mind thinking.
@jimu57 ...surely ur not insinuating that "something" came from god... because there is scientific proof of how old this planet is and how it was created. so science... something came from science u fucking idiot
@Chillaaaaxxx Ok Einstein, YOU tell me where all matter came from. Dont give me the bullshit about abiogenesis because that is not what it is about. Matter cannot be created not destroyed. Where did it come from? Science cannot explain. There was a creator. Period!
@jimu57 Are you serious? Science could not explain how we had night and day 2,000 years ago, does that mean the earth didn't revolve around the sun? You said, correctly I might add, that matter cannot be created nor destroyed, then you say there was a creator....Now you know why the more educated the individual, the less likely they are to be religious.
if there is a creator that can break the laws of physics at will, then he created the matter and energy that exists in the universe, no more.
It does not mean he created men directly out of will the way most theists state it.
you may argue that the chances of intelligent life forming are so small that it is impossible otherwise, but look up at the sky for once. The universe is big. very. fucking. big. that means infinite chances of life forming.
a singularity exploding creating hydrogen atoms whose gravity brought them together to form stars as the stars got older their pressure increased turning hydrogen into all the heavier elements the stars exploded and the carbon which evolved into life was spread around the universe. and to explain the singularity it had no space which means it had no time so it doesnt need a starting or ending point
Evolution actually has NOTHING to do with the origin of life, absolutely NOTHING. All evolution is, is the change in the frequency of alleles do to natural selection and subsequent speciation resulting from such changes in allele frequency.
There's 0 Evidence for any 'worldwide flood', dinosaur fossils have never been found with human fossils, and Archaeology has already proven that most of the old testament is bullshit (THE BIBLE'S BURIED SECRETS : NOVA / BBC) WATCH IT. LEARN IT. The BIBLE IS BULLSHIT and a made up story by early jews who destroyed their own civilization due to class warfare (rich vs. poor). YHWH is a Babylonian water god who was stolen and renamed.
Instead of just admiting that holy books are wrong in light of evidence, they will try to say that the book says things it doesn't say. Or "the creation story is just a metaphor". It's a way of still keeping their faith while having to accept new information. Bottom line is you can't have it both ways.
Thing is, people don't get to rewrite the Bible. You can't say "Well, I believe the Bible, but I believe that God got the evolution ball rolling." The biblical creation story indicates NOTHING of the sort. Either you believe the biblical story, or you don't. You can't make it mean what you wan't it to mean. Just 50 yrs ago, most believers took every word of the Bible literally. It's only in this new information age with evidence coming to light that this "metaphorical" creation apology has began
@TempleOfInanna2 Actually, the Bible has been rewritten, revised and generally cherry picked over the past 2000 years to suit the needs of different rulers.
@grandmasterreggaex I know that :) I'm making a point someone can't henestly claim to believe the biblical creation story which states that man was created insantaneously AND claim that the same god got the evolution ball rolling. They are two completely different things, but many religious folks try to link them anyhow because FACTS are now present, and it gives them a way to hold onto their faith, albeit a dishonest one.
I heard this broad live. I was stunned how informed and laser point accurate Howard was here. I had no idea Howard was so knowledgeable about the evolution/creationism debate.
Scott Depace is the typical uninformed buffet Christian. They pick and chose what they want from the bible, what their comfortable with, and leave the rest. Most buffet Christians are woefully ignorant not only of evolution but the bible as well.
sounds like you need to teach" how to keep church and state separate to aviod the second dark ages 101" and these "christians who say well you will know im right when jesus comes back, he dead he looong dead, forever. sorry brainwashed fools
A dog is ment to be a Dog A Cat is ment to be a Cat, A Ape, Monkey or whatever animal is ment to be that, A human was ment to be Human, They where all made by whatever you feel , but by something. We cant learn anything new if we view it with anger, your just not gonna take it in and give your mind time to join the dots. A stepping Stone to understanding abit more regarding this would be a guy named Lloyd Pye, You can view his lectures on youtube ect.
howard doesn't know too much about what he's talking about regarding evolution, but he knows enough..he knows some simple shit, and he knows to take the word of 99.8% of earth and life experts.
; Federally funded schools, according to the first amendment, aren't allowed to teach religious doctrine, except as a comparative philosophy class. Let's see Temples, Mosques, and Churches teach accredited reading, writing, and arithmetic classes.
It's funny Creationists say they don't 'believe' in Evolution, might as well say you don't believe in trees, they exist whether you believe in them or not.
As a Christian, Howard is sort of right. Since God really can't be analyzed scientifically we have to go with the Bull-bleep theory of evolution, It's all we got. But it's like Global warming. it's B.S.
Why can't people grasp that evolution doesn't eliminate God and God doesn't eliminate evolution. Evolution does not mean man came from apes; if it did I would understand doubts, but it does not.
Man did not evolve from monkeys as we know them today. This is one of the most common misconceptions regarding evolution today. Monkeys evolved from the same thing as man did, but due to different surroundings and needs to thrive we evolved differently. People often say "Well if evolution is real, then why are there still monkeys!?". The question doesn't even make sense if you understand evolution even on a base level. The problem is that most people don't.
@lonnmaj15 For the same reason Gravity is still a Theory. A scientific theory is fact. The word "theory" as we use it in day to day life has a very different meaning to the way "theory" is used in reference to science.
@lonnmaj15 Because everything in science is technically called a theory (except gravity, which can be proven beyond any doubt). But the theory of evolution is one of the most universally accepted theories of science, and has been for almost 200 years now.
@will1129 thanks for responding. but what's the difference between a scientific theory from a scientific law? because i know that gravity is called the 'law of gravity'. same as for the 'law of inertia' etc. what's their difference to the ones that are just called theories?
2) Theories - explanatory frameworks that describe the facts (the theory of gravity describes how gravity works)
3) A scientific law is a concise verbal or mathematical statement of a relation that expresses a fundamental principle of science. Look up Newtons laws of motion on Wikipedia for example.
The theory of evolution describes the observed facts of evolution.
@lonnmaj15 Idk I'm not a scientist..but I think it depends on whether it can be proven beyond any doubt, a la gravity. With evolution scientists are like 99% sure that we evolved over time based on bones, fossils, etc., but i guess that still can't prove it 100%. If anyone else has a science background please chime in.
I like how he berates his own creationist audience and tells them not to listen to him.
But Howard should learn a little more about evolution ig if he is preaching it, because he makes it sound like a simpler theory than it is. He basically just says he follows science, which is fine but if you want to tell creationists they are idiots you should come with a little more evidence. The creationist might just assume your brainwashed unless you say exactly why you believe in evolution.
LOVE HOWARD
floresebu 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this movie looks pretty fun, based on evolution vs. creation, I like the fact that just 2 brothers made the entire thing, called EVOLUTION CREEK, look it up!
chauncyhead 4 days ago
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
@Mogley52 I see you are still spamming off your website to promote your flat Earth beliefs. This is in violation of youtubes terms of service.
But then you can't be a creationist and an honest person.
johnrainrules 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mogley52 "EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. "
This statement literally makes no sense.
"Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. "
Where? Relativity doesn't actually have a lot to do with the Big Bang Theory. You should probably stop cuntpasting from creationist websites.
johnrainrules 2 weeks ago
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mogley52 From your article "Not all evolutionists even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. "
This is a laugh because Biologists are actually very consistent about what species a fossil belongs to. Creationists on the other hand will claim a bone is a human with rickets one day and a chimpanzee the next. Same creationist and same bone.
Did you graduate highschool?
johnrainrules 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mogley52 " Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator"
And Newton believed you could turn lead into gold. Luckily science is about what you can prove, not random opinions from "big scientists".
johnrainrules 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mogley52 "The supernatural cannot be proved by science "
Neither can Leprechauns, and for the exact same reason.
"science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe"
Your inability to come up with another option is not "scientific evidence", all you are doing is using special pleading because your faulty reasoning led you to an infinite regress. That is the exact opposite of science.
johnrainrules 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mogley52 Your article commits the fallacy of Ex Post Facto statistics and Special Pleading in the first 2 paragraphs.Also the protein molecule argument was proved false experimentally in 2009. How about making your own arguments as opposed to hoping some lame creationist website is arguing correctly even if you obviously don't understand it.
johnrainrules 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mogley52 "NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). "
I want an actual definition of "kinds" so that when you make this claim I can show Evolution by Natural Selection is predictive and creationism is silly.
johnrainrules 2 weeks ago
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation. Also read my Internet article, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH! According to a Newsweek article quoting a NASA scientist, in the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (now meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil.
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mogley52 "Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. "
This is an assertion without evidence, and it also poses a problem for your God who would have had to come into existence from nothing. The cosmological argument is just a mass of special pleading.
johnrainrules 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
based on the battle between evolution and creation, check out our new sci fi movie EVOLUTION CREEK decide for yourself!
chauncyhead 3 weeks ago
"I know, Rush is doing a great job with you." Hahaha I love Howard Stern.
mknippy1 4 weeks ago
As much as I hate Howard Stern, HE IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.
icefoxdesert 1 month ago
Bible = fairytales. I would believe the story of Jack and the bean stalk before I would believe anything out of the bible - although there are some very entertaining stories there - lots of brutality; death, violence, destruction, torment, torture, prostitution - just open up to the book of Joshua for starters and go from there.
pucksterz12 1 month ago
@pucksterz12 I think there would be lots of death in a book that tells you what happens when you disobey God.
thepostfk 3 weeks ago
I love how Howard Stern understands the separation between church & state (Thomas Jefferson's term for the 1st amendment establishment clause). It's consistent with his libertarianism. I like how he has no patience with religious nut jobs who want to duble talk us into watering down our science standards. This was fun to listen to.
prschuster 2 months ago
As a Biology teacher, in the southern USA, I will create a shitstorm if any administrator tries to drag religion or holy book crap into my curriculum. If you are a science teacher and opine in your class or bring in religious dogma, you need to resign. Go teach Sunday school. Science pwns ANY holy book and puts it where it belongs, in your church. Do not bring it into my classroom.
saxmanchiro 2 months ago 9
@saxmanchiro Biology and Southern USA? Sounds like an oxymoron to me...
Lolmeistercom 1 month ago 6
@Lolmeistercom You could say that.
saxmanchiro 1 month ago
I agree w/ Howard , but he went at it just like the wack job creationist fools do. Preach preach ! Just state the facts and b done.
I guess he was in a billoinaire fit at the time.
How dare u disagree with the all mighty pissed off boff ! Howard ! Let them disagree and make fools out of themselves. Sounds like Beth got a new pair of glasses and didn't want to have sex with the sexy stern. Waaah.
Lvduggo69 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 2 months ago
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 2 months ago
@Mogley52
Evolution doesn't directly say that there is no deity. It simply states how life was formed which, while supported by fact, directly opposes the book of genesis. You can believe in both, but you gotta be more flexible than a brick wall to think for your self. The sad truth is, churches and such won't allow any deviation from their scriptures whatsoever. It's entirely possible to be theistic as well as an evolutionist.
I for one, am spaghettitarian.
watafug 2 months ago
@Mogley52 Science doesn't point toward any supernatural intelligence. It just deals with evidence for natural phenomena. Philosophers and theologians can use the findings of science to back up their own world views. but science is neutral on questions about the supernatural. Understand the difference.
prschuster 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mogley52 Science doesn't point toward any supernatural intelligence. It just deals with evidence for natural phenomena. Philosophers and theologians can use the findings of science to back up their own world views. but science is neutral on questions about the supernatural. Understand the difference.
prschuster 2 months ago
@Mogley52 "but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe", massive fail on your part, try again.
ssallen1s 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 2 months ago
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 2 months ago
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
Mogley52 2 months ago
@jimu57 Somebody has some fucking self esteem issues. if you weremreally as smart as you say you are you wouldnt feel the need to validate yourself on youtube. Go back and hide in your basement.
Seanmurf95 2 months ago
Fred is the *only* intelligent person on this stupid show.
xxdiogenescynicxx 2 months ago
Lol, I love Howard Stern.
The whole world is laughing at America and this whole anti-science creationist rubbish.
If the creationists get their way, then surely ALL religious creationism must be taught, including the Hindu version which involves a giant inter-galactic space-turtle creating the earth.....
OrthodoxDarwinist 3 months ago
They should do a statistic if parents that adopt consider themselves pro-choice or pro-life. I'm sure most of them would be pro-choice.
alonzo9772 3 months ago
In the ground they found fossilized bones. Not bones per se! Creationism is a disgrace to America. It's pure nonsense!
somethingdiffereable 3 months ago
This is such a dumb discussion. Too bad Howard got roped into it. It's fairly simple, teach reality, and let the mythology people discuss it on their own time. We don't teach our students about Zeus or Odin, so there is no reason to teach about Allah or Yahweh.
skywize 3 months ago
lol "pro life, when the baby's born fuck you!.."
iPriestHolmes 4 months ago
we should pray for howard... ha psych, fuck god.
iPriestHolmes 4 months ago
Why is everyone arguing.. Each to their own.. I'm a Muslim and I believe this beautiful universe and everything in is a creation, not from random events but from a creator.. Religion is a way if life..science is a took for understanding.. Religion shows us how to live along side one another.. The reality is we will all go to the grave.. Prepare for that!!!
habz999 4 months ago
This is why I like Howard!
BillyMumfrey 4 months ago
Howard, dont use the word "creation." There are these fucking idiots around who believe in creationism, and they hear just that word and think they´ve won the argument right there.
bary1234 4 months ago
8:50 LOL!
xn117 5 months ago
I dont even know why ppl bother arguing over it either way. Everyone thinks there beliefs are the right way and will never change, so why even bother.
Would be nice if ppl were as worried about getting jobs, taking care of thier kids and paying there rent instead of things that dont help either way.
80s90ssports 5 months ago
Wow, I can't believe how many people don't stop and think. Do you feel smart when you tell a creationist that your great grandfather was a monkey? I don't have any monkeys in my family tree. Perhaps you inherited your common sense from apes your ancestors were f*cking? I think that is a far more likely theory than evolution.
seraph595 5 months ago
I strongly disagreed with Stern and thought he was full of shit and just a shock jock based on what he's done in the past with Selena and some of the other juvenile rants when he was on radio. Or at least what gave him publicity.
I never understand why anyone would listen to him.
I've now listened to several clips on YouTube and find that he has far more dept then what I once thought and find him very interesting.
He seems to be talking honestly and has the guts to speak him mind.
MrHoolits 5 months ago 8
@MrHoolits Interesting comment; Glad to hear you gave him a listen. I think most peoples opinion of Stern would change if they actually heard more of his radio show.
AtheistsThinkMore 3 months ago 5
@AtheistsThinkMore, I am not a fan or like any kind of shock jock type stuff and I've heard some of his earlier work and in my opinion is made for titillation and sometimes reaches for the lowest common denominator though I have a only have a little to go by.
His recent work, again in my opinion, seems more mature and has much more substance. I enjoyed his conversations with American Patriot Jesse Ventura.
What I do like from what I hear is someone who is honest & not to full of themselves.
MrHoolits 3 months ago
undressing women and owning creationists....Howard Stern FTW
ptango666 5 months ago
How did something come from ABSOLUTE nothing in the first place? The only answer is God. Science doesn't have one. If everything did come from nothing, why doesn't something just return to nothing again? Why aren't there more big-bang like events?
66GreenBaron66 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@66GreenBaron66 Where did god come from?
BTCforlife 4 months ago
Look, no matter what you subscribe to, you're left with the horribly awesome concept of something literally coming from nothing. If you think God did it all, then God is that something. If you think it's all chaos (and even if there is an endless cycle of universes starting and ending), we're still left with something - this endless cycle, the potential for this, etc. coming from nothing. We can't escape this and this is MIND blowing.
metametazonezone 5 months ago
INSTITUTE OF CREATIONISM...
when creationists provide all Scientific proof and evidence that completely challenge the stupid evolution...jerks like howad would scream "is not science"!!!
get AAAAAA life.
mrtriplewinner 5 months ago
@mrtriplewinner : You have to be trolling. Nobody can be as stupid as that. Damn you would have to be skullfucked untill your whole brain is whipped in to bloody pulp before you could fall for creationist propaganda.
bary1234 4 months ago
Howard Stern "explaining" a failed, corrupted THEORY, full of crazy assumptions? uaw...that is IRRATIONAL
LOL
mrtriplewinner 5 months ago
Nobody has ever found a rabbit fossil in the Cambrian strata
upgrade01a 5 months ago
The theory correctly predicted that our sun must have some way to produce energy for billions of years. DNA "boiling point" temperatures, nicely match the tree of life that was a part of the theory
upgrade01a 5 months ago
Evolution is older than relativity and has never been falsified, even though it would be extremely easy to do, were it false. Relativity breaks down on very tiny scales, and when the mass is very large
upgrade01a 5 months ago
He was more fun to listen to when there was the thrill that the FCC might go after him, but this was pretty good material
upgrade01a 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Popular Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Sexuality is not just for reproduction. There are reasons why the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Scripture teaches we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be spiritual joy as well as pleasures in heaven.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE, because of entropy, could not have sustained itself eternally. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ANY REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article that examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of both transitional forms and lack of sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 6 months ago
Its just easy to say god created everything,these creationist are borderline mentaly retarded
cucamongafreddy 6 months ago
@cucamongafreddy I thought it was just willful ignorance for a while, but this shit has gone on so long now that I'm thinking you might be right. Maybe they really, truly, honestly do not possess the mental faculties they need.
M0US3P0T4TO 5 months ago
There is not even any record in written history of anything like that.
jeremythehuman 6 months ago
And I think the most accepted theory by scientists as to how the dinosaurs went extinct is that a comet or asteroid crashed into earth. We have evidence of an asteroid or comet impact on the coast of the Yucatan Peninsula. It is a crater. Now the size of the crater shows that the impact would have caused a global catastrophe. If humans have existed since Adam and Eve like fundamentalists Christians believe. How would they have survived?
jeremythehuman 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Imagine a fish with part fins, part feet with fins evolving into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible in nature (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). Species couldn't have survived while their vital tissues, organs, biological systems were still evolving. Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weeb¬ly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
2nd Law of Thermodynamics... THERE'S SOME SCIENCE FOR YA BRO... CHECK THAT OUT... THAT IS A BIG BIG PROBLEMS FOR EVOLUTIONISTS...
mnickles89 6 months ago
Comment removed
KaptajnRock 6 months ago
@mnickles89 Wrong. The second law of thermodynamics only applies in a closed system where no matter or energy leaves or enters. Earth is NOT a closed system therefore the 2nd rule of thermodynamics doesn't apply, meaning your argument fails on all levels.
MC473428 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ok Howard, then tell me where all matter and early life came from? EVOLUTION means change. What changes? Something. Where did something comes from? You cannot evolve from nothing.
jimu57 7 months ago
@jimu57 You might want to check out the documentaries in my playlist to learn where matter and early life came from.
AtheistsThinkMore 6 months ago 8
Comment removed
assfuul 6 months ago
@jimu57 evolution doesent explain how things started abiogenesis does that look it up
assfuul 6 months ago
@assfuul abiogenesis only works on something. there has to be something there to begin with. where did that come from? look it up.
jimu57 3 months ago
@jimu57 You're a fucking idiot
lanebaguss14 6 months ago
@lanebaguss14 You must have the same IQ as Stern, somewhere around room temperature. Its dickless wonders like you that waste bandwidth and oxygen. Try readin a little. Or better yet, go to college and study science like me. hamster fucking hag!
jimu57 5 months ago
@jimu57 You can't evolve from nothing... you just sound stupid. You're not right and i'm not right. Don't say because you study science, that makes your "you cant evolve from nothing" theory true. Don't get all upset over a youtube post...
lanebaguss14 5 months ago
@jimu57 Are you braindead?
winterstellar 6 months ago
@winterstellar No, I am reather inteligent. That is why I respond to crap like this. And if you fall for it you must be crap too.
jimu57 5 months ago
@jimu57 EVOLUTION is the study of natural selection. ABIOGENESIS is the study of how biological life arises. Is it willful ignorance or a genuinely low IQ that makes people refuse to understand that there is a difference? Just because you religious folks don't understand how to use a hammer doesn't mean that you should try to prevent everybody else (who knows what a hammer is and how it should be used) from doing so.
M0US3P0T4TO 5 months ago
@M0US3P0T4TO I have considerable knowledge in evolution and also abiogenesis. I learned it in COLLEGE and research. I haev a rather high IQ. I am a christian, not a religionist. I probably know more about abiogenesis that you will ever know, so dont throw out words that you know nothing about. our defintion of abiogenesis is very elementary. Makes me realize you know nothing about it. Dont waste my time with your small mind thinking.
jimu57 5 months ago
@jimu57 ...surely ur not insinuating that "something" came from god... because there is scientific proof of how old this planet is and how it was created. so science... something came from science u fucking idiot
Chillaaaaxxx 5 months ago
@Chillaaaaxxx Ok Einstein, YOU tell me where all matter came from. Dont give me the bullshit about abiogenesis because that is not what it is about. Matter cannot be created not destroyed. Where did it come from? Science cannot explain. There was a creator. Period!
jimu57 4 months ago
@jimu57 Are you serious? Science could not explain how we had night and day 2,000 years ago, does that mean the earth didn't revolve around the sun? You said, correctly I might add, that matter cannot be created nor destroyed, then you say there was a creator....Now you know why the more educated the individual, the less likely they are to be religious.
thelordmemnoch 4 months ago
@jimu57 What the fuck are you talking about, where the fuck did god come from cunt.
dickhead2905 4 months ago
@jimu57
if there is a creator that can break the laws of physics at will, then he created the matter and energy that exists in the universe, no more.
It does not mean he created men directly out of will the way most theists state it.
you may argue that the chances of intelligent life forming are so small that it is impossible otherwise, but look up at the sky for once. The universe is big. very. fucking. big. that means infinite chances of life forming.
watafug 2 months ago
@jimu57 That is not the topic of evolution. In fact that is not even Biology it is Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy.
MWcrazyhorse 4 months ago
@jimu57
a singularity exploding creating hydrogen atoms whose gravity brought them together to form stars as the stars got older their pressure increased turning hydrogen into all the heavier elements the stars exploded and the carbon which evolved into life was spread around the universe. and to explain the singularity it had no space which means it had no time so it doesnt need a starting or ending point
OrangeSaint420 3 months ago
@jimu57
Evolution actually has NOTHING to do with the origin of life, absolutely NOTHING. All evolution is, is the change in the frequency of alleles do to natural selection and subsequent speciation resulting from such changes in allele frequency.
That's all, and there isn't any more.
OrthodoxDarwinist 3 months ago
Epic rant
ntesla3327 7 months ago
In the approximate words of Bill Hicks
"If you look at anyone who believes in creationism, they look like Neanderthals"
"creationists watch the Flintstones as if it were a documentary"
thenameless13 7 months ago
You take her and you weggie her. Yes!
jeremythehuman 7 months ago
Evolution isn't something that you can be believed in. It's a fact!
Belief is fact-less by definition! Look it up!
TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE 7 months ago
There's 0 Evidence for any 'worldwide flood', dinosaur fossils have never been found with human fossils, and Archaeology has already proven that most of the old testament is bullshit (THE BIBLE'S BURIED SECRETS : NOVA / BBC) WATCH IT. LEARN IT. The BIBLE IS BULLSHIT and a made up story by early jews who destroyed their own civilization due to class warfare (rich vs. poor). YHWH is a Babylonian water god who was stolen and renamed.
electronicoffee 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stern is an idiot. Evolution never happened.
There is no one fact of evolution, just stories.
mejc2 7 months ago
Instead of just admiting that holy books are wrong in light of evidence, they will try to say that the book says things it doesn't say. Or "the creation story is just a metaphor". It's a way of still keeping their faith while having to accept new information. Bottom line is you can't have it both ways.
TempleOfInanna2 7 months ago
Thing is, people don't get to rewrite the Bible. You can't say "Well, I believe the Bible, but I believe that God got the evolution ball rolling." The biblical creation story indicates NOTHING of the sort. Either you believe the biblical story, or you don't. You can't make it mean what you wan't it to mean. Just 50 yrs ago, most believers took every word of the Bible literally. It's only in this new information age with evidence coming to light that this "metaphorical" creation apology has began
TempleOfInanna2 7 months ago
@TempleOfInanna2 Actually, the Bible has been rewritten, revised and generally cherry picked over the past 2000 years to suit the needs of different rulers.
grandmasterreggaex 7 months ago
@grandmasterreggaex I know that :) I'm making a point someone can't henestly claim to believe the biblical creation story which states that man was created insantaneously AND claim that the same god got the evolution ball rolling. They are two completely different things, but many religious folks try to link them anyhow because FACTS are now present, and it gives them a way to hold onto their faith, albeit a dishonest one.
TempleOfInanna2 7 months ago
PRAISE CHRIST, MURDER ATHEISTS
joemj413 7 months ago
@joemj413 LOL!
xn117 7 months ago
@joemj413 eat shit
zxygh 7 months ago
@joemj413 Christ was a murderer.
islamDick 7 months ago
If we came from dirt, why is there still dirt?
RonBurgundy161 7 months ago
I never enjoyed Howard...after listening to this video...I LOVE him!!!!!
Robert4229 7 months ago
Well said Howard!!!!!
AungUnElric 7 months ago
I heard this broad live. I was stunned how informed and laser point accurate Howard was here. I had no idea Howard was so knowledgeable about the evolution/creationism debate.
Scott Depace is the typical uninformed buffet Christian. They pick and chose what they want from the bible, what their comfortable with, and leave the rest. Most buffet Christians are woefully ignorant not only of evolution but the bible as well.
Howard rocks!
metalsusa1 7 months ago
"Oprah Winfrey: Negro Woman From The South" LOL!
chris812125 7 months ago
Everything about this was epic.
"You take her and you wedgie her!" Nearly pissed myself
boricuamm707 7 months ago 4
Hey hey hey, technically, we're all on some kind of drug and that doesn't necessarily make someone act stupidly.
djlazlow1 8 months ago
sounds like you need to teach" how to keep church and state separate to aviod the second dark ages 101" and these "christians who say well you will know im right when jesus comes back, he dead he looong dead, forever. sorry brainwashed fools
stalkingcat123 8 months ago
Comment removed
stalkingcat123 8 months ago
A dog is ment to be a Dog A Cat is ment to be a Cat, A Ape, Monkey or whatever animal is ment to be that, A human was ment to be Human, They where all made by whatever you feel , but by something. We cant learn anything new if we view it with anger, your just not gonna take it in and give your mind time to join the dots. A stepping Stone to understanding abit more regarding this would be a guy named Lloyd Pye, You can view his lectures on youtube ect.
LoveIsFreeGiveItFree 8 months ago
The truth is considered "hate speech" when people hate the truth.
ssallen1s 8 months ago
I am pro death lmao
CamiloSanchez1979 8 months ago
howard doesn't know too much about what he's talking about regarding evolution, but he knows enough..he knows some simple shit, and he knows to take the word of 99.8% of earth and life experts.
itzahazylife 8 months ago
@itzahazylife haha yea, i was a little afraid when he said humans evolved from monkeys, but he seemed to recover from there
thegegors 7 months ago
Ahh yes I agreed with every single thing Howard said.
smiller9295 8 months ago
Bullshit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
M076n7 8 months ago
; Federally funded schools, according to the first amendment, aren't allowed to teach religious doctrine, except as a comparative philosophy class. Let's see Temples, Mosques, and Churches teach accredited reading, writing, and arithmetic classes.
12Zwolf 8 months ago
"It helps me!... How does it help me?"...lmao! LOVE howard!
teapreacher 8 months ago
It's funny Creationists say they don't 'believe' in Evolution, might as well say you don't believe in trees, they exist whether you believe in them or not.
chrispower1981 8 months ago
Howard's angry rant are priceless!!!!
stevetager69 8 months ago
As a Christian, Howard is sort of right. Since God really can't be analyzed scientifically we have to go with the Bull-bleep theory of evolution, It's all we got. But it's like Global warming. it's B.S.
superdoobo 8 months ago
@superdoobo Typical republican stupidity........
ssallen1s 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People who attack the theory of evolution are not necessarily religious.
superdoobo 8 months ago
Why can't people grasp that evolution doesn't eliminate God and God doesn't eliminate evolution. Evolution does not mean man came from apes; if it did I would understand doubts, but it does not.
Ashurst 8 months ago
Man did not evolve from monkeys as we know them today. This is one of the most common misconceptions regarding evolution today. Monkeys evolved from the same thing as man did, but due to different surroundings and needs to thrive we evolved differently. People often say "Well if evolution is real, then why are there still monkeys!?". The question doesn't even make sense if you understand evolution even on a base level. The problem is that most people don't.
BenboBevins 8 months ago 3
why is it still called 'theory' of evolution and not scientific 'fact' if it is already been proven?
lonnmaj15 8 months ago
@lonnmaj15 For the same reason Gravity is still a Theory. A scientific theory is fact. The word "theory" as we use it in day to day life has a very different meaning to the way "theory" is used in reference to science.
LordUa437 8 months ago 3
@lonnmaj15 Because everything in science is technically called a theory (except gravity, which can be proven beyond any doubt). But the theory of evolution is one of the most universally accepted theories of science, and has been for almost 200 years now.
will1129 8 months ago
@will1129 thanks for responding. but what's the difference between a scientific theory from a scientific law? because i know that gravity is called the 'law of gravity'. same as for the 'law of inertia' etc. what's their difference to the ones that are just called theories?
lonnmaj15 8 months ago
@lonnmaj15
There are three different things here:
1) Observed facts/data
2) Theories - explanatory frameworks that describe the facts (the theory of gravity describes how gravity works)
3) A scientific law is a concise verbal or mathematical statement of a relation that expresses a fundamental principle of science. Look up Newtons laws of motion on Wikipedia for example.
The theory of evolution describes the observed facts of evolution.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 8 months ago 8
@lonnmaj15 Idk I'm not a scientist..but I think it depends on whether it can be proven beyond any doubt, a la gravity. With evolution scientists are like 99% sure that we evolved over time based on bones, fossils, etc., but i guess that still can't prove it 100%. If anyone else has a science background please chime in.
will1129 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@will1129 Scientists are 100% sure we evolved over time, the uncertainty comes from the specifics
thegegors 7 months ago
@lonnmaj15 why is still a "theory" of realitivity and not scientific "fact" if it has (not it) been proven? youre and idiot
petermouse420 5 months ago
scott de pace is a faggot.
xn117 8 months ago
Fla Fla Flunkey
Clausfarre 8 months ago
What anyone believes has ABSOLUTELY no bearing on what is actually the case (no matter how many people believe it).
That is all.
steveb0503 8 months ago
I just gained a whole new respect for howard stern.
FirebirdKnight 8 months ago 4
I like how he berates his own creationist audience and tells them not to listen to him.
But Howard should learn a little more about evolution ig if he is preaching it, because he makes it sound like a simpler theory than it is. He basically just says he follows science, which is fine but if you want to tell creationists they are idiots you should come with a little more evidence. The creationist might just assume your brainwashed unless you say exactly why you believe in evolution.
mrpayne123 8 months ago
this is howard at his best!!!!!for those who believe in science f YOu!!
howard is the best to show that people how believe in god are idiots!
jmartinezLA323 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is howard at his best!!!!!for those who believe in science f YOu!!
jmartinezLA323 8 months ago
this is howard at his best!!!!!for those who believe in science f YOu!!
jmartinezLA323 8 months ago