You can see how the building meets resistance when it falls on top of the other half, and the continues to fall down at the reduced speed. It's NOT free fall speed. You can't grind up a building and have it collapse at free fall speed. The energy output isn't possible, the free fall speed is the entirety of the energy that is being generated, so it slowing down as a result of the resistance it meets with the floors below is expected and represented in this video, which doesn't happen on 9/11
this proves that the wtc was not brought down explosives, its just the top floors pulverizing the bottom floors. PS if you disagree with me PLEASE don't reply to the post, i don't feel like getting into arguments
@JohHughes94 Actually no, sometimes explosives are placed on all floors to demolish all of them...notice how this is half way down! And key demolition charges were most likely placed on internal columns at the same time to cause the pancake effect. Also notice the apparent deceleration here compared to the WTCs. Just search up some other TOP-Down demolition videos that show them on all floors going off.
@JohHughes94 Here's the link: /watch?v=2NZtBL1PjMk Notice how it starts at the top, proportional to that of the WTC, not half like in this video. Clearly the massive ejections we saw on the WTCs were that of internal demolition charges using a combination of explosives all individually timed. The North Tower would have plastic explosives pre-fitted in the concrete core to demolish it too
@NothingAtAllXD if they were internal demolition charges they would be shot out in a different way not a smooth motion, also your previous argument where you say it slows down in this video is true but it also starts to slow down at the wtc the things that you see free falling ARE free falling, its debris from the top of the building falling down around it not the actual building which takes much longer to finish collapsing
@JohHughes94 The ejections were clearly not in the flowing at the same speed of the collapsing debris and "flow" as you allude to. You can clearly see violent ejections in the actual collapse video. Witness testimony confirms this. Let me ask you this, does a launched Hellfire Missile (aimed at the ground) or a freely-falling brick in a vacuum hit the ground first? The debris was clearly sublimating and vaporizing with smoke as it plummeted to the ground from explosions, faster than free-fall.
@NothingAtAllXD Also, do you have any idea how to plant explosives? you have to either wrap the around the supporting columns or drill a hole in the column and put the explosives in that, which in the case of the world trade center the supporting columns were the facade, you wuld have had to see the explosive charges which you don't, the other columns are located in the core of the building which would require months of ripping walls apart and planting explosives.
@JohHughes94 Anyone who had access to the Elevators shafts had full access to the interior of the columns and the concrete core of the North Tower, which was exploded with large amounts of plastic explosives which explains the spire that we saw which was elevator columns with rebarb sticking out. The South Tower was just columns and could easily be rigged and demolished as we saw! If the gov't was involved, don't you think they would have the resources, time and planning?
@JohHughes94 Just think about the Manhattan Project, insane compartmentalization going on there! Now apply that to the Twin Towers and think about it. The building could've been rigged while it was being built or during a phase of its construction, which is unlikely but still possible. The US Gov't is the elite Hegemonic power dominating the world, if they can create WMDs that can level cities in seconds, what's wrong with rigging the WTCs with a semi-unconventional demolition method?
@NothingAtAllXD Also the building clearly collapses from the point of impact by the plane so if there were explosives they would have to have been an amazing control system to set them off, also they weren't set off when the planes hit!! It's not that i believe everything the government says, its just there story has evidence to back it up and makes sense.
@JohHughes94 Actually, no, if you watched the collapse. Several stories above the collapse zone were severed and THEN the building fell through the collapse zone with no distinction from the alleged weakened columns from 50,000 Degrees Burning Jet Fuel and fully, intact and operating structural steel. Violates Newton's 3rd Law and shows no sign of deceleration like the Verinage Demol. Technique which has the columns knocked out more than halfway and the columns already weakened all throughout...
@JohHughes94 It doesn't make sense. Let's say the Jet Fuel fires were strong enough to melt the steel or weaken it which is impossible, the building would topple OVER into the path of least resistance like pulling out a few columns from a jenga tower. The North Tower's Collapse started to do that and totally debunked the pile driver theory that NIST painted but than swayed back and was pulverized into dust from superheated explosions going off in the center.
@JohHughes94 Tell that to the gov't. They start unconstitutional wars in Libya. Warrantless wiretapping, your Appeals to Tradition that don't even exist prove nothing.
@NothingAtAllXD Also your statement is false, the world trade center didn't have a concrete core, learn some facts and investigate before jumping to conclusions
@JohHughes94 I did investigate, go look it up on Google Images, but of course those Ground Zero images were planted by Truthers. I've seen the PBS Documentary, you need to do some research.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?
@ctcole77 If fire can bring down a steel framed skyscraper why don't they just set fire to buildings and save thousands of dollars on explosives ? It worked well on 9/11 knocking down two 110 story buildings in 9.2 seconds in to a neat little pile and a few hours later building 7 a 47 story skyscraper in 6.2 seconds and not even hit by a plane. Answers on a post card to, I'm a dumb fuck and I believe everything my government tell me, The white house USA
@ctcole77Gosh it is so easy to see. Those buildings were blow to dust by explosives lol this is so sad it is almost funny. Except for the fact 3000 people were killed and forget that they deserve the truth and justice. Seems only fair to investigate every aspect of 911 and if a real investigation takes place, get those behind it unless it was really the caveman in sandals that did it. Not!
@NothingAtAllXD Also /watch?v=UpolV5bBIKk&feature=related this shows you the explosives clearly wrapped around the supporting columns. Even if the government acted as a whole (highly unlikely) and committed this crime, unlimited resources doesn't explain why no one ever saw detention cord, or any kind of explosives. also the firemen who claim they heard explosions weren't wrong, its been proven that several cars including a diesel tanker truck exploded in the garage.
@JohHughes94 Actually very unlikely. Look up Operation Northwoods, Op Ajax, Op Gladio, Bay of Tonkin False Flag, USS Liberty False Flag...Det cords weren't seen because many of the explosives were individually timed and from other incendiaries would melt everything including demolition cord easily. Manhattan Project successfully compartmentalized 100,000 people to work on Nuke Research with stunning results. FDNY men heard "detonators" going off at collapse...
@JohHughes94 Also, you seriously need to watch this: /watch?v=VZ1E2NPl-s8 ++Just shows exactly what happened to the WTCs, concept has been done before. Also take a look at this good analysis: /watch?v=hSApOavkHg8&feature=channel_video_title ++Only plausible mechanism that can contribute to what we saw that day is a combination of pre-planted incendiaries and conventional explosives pulled off by an elite demo. team in the military. Just stop for a second and think...
@NothingAtAllXD Dude, take a few hours to watch videos on how the world trade center was constructed, maybe then you will understand, ive argued my point, and you have argued yours, i don't see any headway on either side so im just going to end the conversation.
@JohHughes94 Debate against all of the contentions of a CD, oh wait, that's too hard. I did, there was a documentary on PBS in 1996 that I can't recall right now that talked about it's concrete-core, rebarb was found all throughout the debris and the core was found standing at ground zero, just google-images it! Concrete just makes the official explanation even more implausible.
@NothingAtAllXD yeah it's too hard to debate someone when they have facts... all you can do is just repeat main stream media talking points or when those fail throw in an ad-hominem(your not american). good job smacking him with facts though. :)
@Impess99 Is there a time limit on conspiracy and murder? NO! The people who are responsible for 9/11 and the murder of 3000 people are still out there, still planning and scheming and we will see more of there evil! They should be held accountable not "oh it was ages ago forget it" your a fucking moron! Do some research, look at facts and science before you dismiss anything dipshit! Let me help you, try starting with this youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0
@Impess99 The Holocaust was 70 years ago, tell the judicial system to stop doing trials for the murder of foreigners. This murdered 3,000 innocent americans on our soil
These buildings are not constructed like the WTC, with a central spine and outer load bearing walls. And if one is doing a demo it matters not where you start as long as you remove the mass below so things "can progress". There are essentially no concrete and no office contents remaining. All of it was pulverized in mid air. It was almost impossible to find even one filing cabinet at the WTC. Thats how much is Missing at the WTC. Including some 1000 people pulverized as well. 220 acres gone
@IExposeMormonism The North Tower has a concrete core that was most likely demolished with the use of an elaborate amount of C4 or some other variant of plastic explosives. Tons of rebarb was found in the debris...even 2 pictures conform a small portion standing of the concrete core covered with rebarb.
I guess this was another of the many top down demolitions Michael Shermer conveniently ignored when he went on Glen Beck and said all demolitions happen from the bottom up.
For all you 9/11 conspiracy nuts out there please watch this *definitive* explanation of a physics behind a GRAVITY driven collapse and how it relates to WTC 1,2 .... you can not argue with this! This is elementary science! You have to watch this.
watch?v=NiHeCjZlkr8
See also this video about an orange (no really)
watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk
And this advert which aired on some NY TV station.
watch?v=hHIj9wzbYGQ
And this message to all you crazy 'truthers' out there
This building wasn't pulled down by bulldozers, instead they used hydrolic rams to push the walls out on one floor, using the building weight to crush the floors below.
Israel runs the US. Nov 24, 2010: Michael Chertoff former head of Homeland Security came public on National Public Radio when he said that he now invests in companies that build the naked body scanners in airports.
Go to the NPR website and search for the transcript of the interview "Chertoff Seeks Full-Body Scanners At Airports"
Michael Chertoff is pushing for full-body scanners to be installed at airports in the wake of the attempted terrorist attack aboard an airliner on Christmas Day.
@TheTracker11rt ~ of course evreybody who disagrees with you is a "zionist disinformation agent" !!!! why is it that most anti-Semetic scumbags are also 9/11 Twoof Tards !?!?!??!?!
@RizeOrDie lol that building came down like that becuz it was pulled down by bulldozers dumbass. any top down demo u see done with explosive however looks nothing like that.
You can see how the building meets resistance when it falls on top of the other half, and the continues to fall down at the reduced speed. It's NOT free fall speed. You can't grind up a building and have it collapse at free fall speed. The energy output isn't possible, the free fall speed is the entirety of the energy that is being generated, so it slowing down as a result of the resistance it meets with the floors below is expected and represented in this video, which doesn't happen on 9/11
notSiD 2 months ago 3
THE MUSIC...IT BURNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LevittownPaIsSpecial 3 months ago
this proves that the wtc was not brought down explosives, its just the top floors pulverizing the bottom floors. PS if you disagree with me PLEASE don't reply to the post, i don't feel like getting into arguments
JohHughes94 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 Actually no, sometimes explosives are placed on all floors to demolish all of them...notice how this is half way down! And key demolition charges were most likely placed on internal columns at the same time to cause the pancake effect. Also notice the apparent deceleration here compared to the WTCs. Just search up some other TOP-Down demolition videos that show them on all floors going off.
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 Here's the link: /watch?v=2NZtBL1PjMk Notice how it starts at the top, proportional to that of the WTC, not half like in this video. Clearly the massive ejections we saw on the WTCs were that of internal demolition charges using a combination of explosives all individually timed. The North Tower would have plastic explosives pre-fitted in the concrete core to demolish it too
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@NothingAtAllXD if they were internal demolition charges they would be shot out in a different way not a smooth motion, also your previous argument where you say it slows down in this video is true but it also starts to slow down at the wtc the things that you see free falling ARE free falling, its debris from the top of the building falling down around it not the actual building which takes much longer to finish collapsing
JohHughes94 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 The ejections were clearly not in the flowing at the same speed of the collapsing debris and "flow" as you allude to. You can clearly see violent ejections in the actual collapse video. Witness testimony confirms this. Let me ask you this, does a launched Hellfire Missile (aimed at the ground) or a freely-falling brick in a vacuum hit the ground first? The debris was clearly sublimating and vaporizing with smoke as it plummeted to the ground from explosions, faster than free-fall.
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@NothingAtAllXD Also, do you have any idea how to plant explosives? you have to either wrap the around the supporting columns or drill a hole in the column and put the explosives in that, which in the case of the world trade center the supporting columns were the facade, you wuld have had to see the explosive charges which you don't, the other columns are located in the core of the building which would require months of ripping walls apart and planting explosives.
JohHughes94 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 Anyone who had access to the Elevators shafts had full access to the interior of the columns and the concrete core of the North Tower, which was exploded with large amounts of plastic explosives which explains the spire that we saw which was elevator columns with rebarb sticking out. The South Tower was just columns and could easily be rigged and demolished as we saw! If the gov't was involved, don't you think they would have the resources, time and planning?
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 Just think about the Manhattan Project, insane compartmentalization going on there! Now apply that to the Twin Towers and think about it. The building could've been rigged while it was being built or during a phase of its construction, which is unlikely but still possible. The US Gov't is the elite Hegemonic power dominating the world, if they can create WMDs that can level cities in seconds, what's wrong with rigging the WTCs with a semi-unconventional demolition method?
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@NothingAtAllXD Also the building clearly collapses from the point of impact by the plane so if there were explosives they would have to have been an amazing control system to set them off, also they weren't set off when the planes hit!! It's not that i believe everything the government says, its just there story has evidence to back it up and makes sense.
JohHughes94 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 Actually, no, if you watched the collapse. Several stories above the collapse zone were severed and THEN the building fell through the collapse zone with no distinction from the alleged weakened columns from 50,000 Degrees Burning Jet Fuel and fully, intact and operating structural steel. Violates Newton's 3rd Law and shows no sign of deceleration like the Verinage Demol. Technique which has the columns knocked out more than halfway and the columns already weakened all throughout...
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 It doesn't make sense. Let's say the Jet Fuel fires were strong enough to melt the steel or weaken it which is impossible, the building would topple OVER into the path of least resistance like pulling out a few columns from a jenga tower. The North Tower's Collapse started to do that and totally debunked the pile driver theory that NIST painted but than swayed back and was pulverized into dust from superheated explosions going off in the center.
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 Just think about it, the gov't has unlimited resources and think tanks to do this...
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@NothingAtAllXD WOW you don't understand the concept of checks and balances do you?
JohHughes94 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 Tell that to the gov't. They start unconstitutional wars in Libya. Warrantless wiretapping, your Appeals to Tradition that don't even exist prove nothing.
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@NothingAtAllXD Also your statement is false, the world trade center didn't have a concrete core, learn some facts and investigate before jumping to conclusions
JohHughes94 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 I did investigate, go look it up on Google Images, but of course those Ground Zero images were planted by Truthers. I've seen the PBS Documentary, you need to do some research.
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?
ctcole77 3 months ago
@ctcole77 If fire can bring down a steel framed skyscraper why don't they just set fire to buildings and save thousands of dollars on explosives ? It worked well on 9/11 knocking down two 110 story buildings in 9.2 seconds in to a neat little pile and a few hours later building 7 a 47 story skyscraper in 6.2 seconds and not even hit by a plane. Answers on a post card to, I'm a dumb fuck and I believe everything my government tell me, The white house USA
giptonsilly 3 months ago
@giptonsilly Dokładnie ;] Wystarczy cysterna z benzyną, nie wiem po co tyle dni planują wyburzenie takiego budynku ;]
Agrael16 3 months ago
@ctcole77Gosh it is so easy to see. Those buildings were blow to dust by explosives lol this is so sad it is almost funny. Except for the fact 3000 people were killed and forget that they deserve the truth and justice. Seems only fair to investigate every aspect of 911 and if a real investigation takes place, get those behind it unless it was really the caveman in sandals that did it. Not!
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@NothingAtAllXD Also /watch?v=UpolV5bBIKk&feature=related this shows you the explosives clearly wrapped around the supporting columns. Even if the government acted as a whole (highly unlikely) and committed this crime, unlimited resources doesn't explain why no one ever saw detention cord, or any kind of explosives. also the firemen who claim they heard explosions weren't wrong, its been proven that several cars including a diesel tanker truck exploded in the garage.
JohHughes94 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 Actually very unlikely. Look up Operation Northwoods, Op Ajax, Op Gladio, Bay of Tonkin False Flag, USS Liberty False Flag...Det cords weren't seen because many of the explosives were individually timed and from other incendiaries would melt everything including demolition cord easily. Manhattan Project successfully compartmentalized 100,000 people to work on Nuke Research with stunning results. FDNY men heard "detonators" going off at collapse...
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 Also, you seriously need to watch this: /watch?v=VZ1E2NPl-s8 ++Just shows exactly what happened to the WTCs, concept has been done before. Also take a look at this good analysis: /watch?v=hSApOavkHg8&feature=channel_video_title ++Only plausible mechanism that can contribute to what we saw that day is a combination of pre-planted incendiaries and conventional explosives pulled off by an elite demo. team in the military. Just stop for a second and think...
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@NothingAtAllXD Dude, take a few hours to watch videos on how the world trade center was constructed, maybe then you will understand, ive argued my point, and you have argued yours, i don't see any headway on either side so im just going to end the conversation.
JohHughes94 4 months ago
@JohHughes94 Debate against all of the contentions of a CD, oh wait, that's too hard. I did, there was a documentary on PBS in 1996 that I can't recall right now that talked about it's concrete-core, rebarb was found all throughout the debris and the core was found standing at ground zero, just google-images it! Concrete just makes the official explanation even more implausible.
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@NothingAtAllXD yeah it's too hard to debate someone when they have facts... all you can do is just repeat main stream media talking points or when those fail throw in an ad-hominem(your not american). good job smacking him with facts though. :)
truthspeaks01 3 months ago
@truthspeaks01 Yeah. I've been doing a lot of research.
NothingAtAllXD 3 months ago
The other building missed the cue!
oldfart387 5 months ago
Wow, proprio come l'11 Settembre 2001.
FreilesDanilo 5 months ago
@THXcooper: jesus dude i posted that 8 months ago, i dont see you bitching at anyone else, so fuck off
amrcnidiot69 6 months ago
9/11 was 10 years ago. Stop talking about conspiracy theories and arguing over it already, jesus christ.
Impess99 6 months ago
@Impess99 Is there a time limit on conspiracy and murder? NO! The people who are responsible for 9/11 and the murder of 3000 people are still out there, still planning and scheming and we will see more of there evil! They should be held accountable not "oh it was ages ago forget it" your a fucking moron! Do some research, look at facts and science before you dismiss anything dipshit! Let me help you, try starting with this youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0
galaxything 5 months ago
@galaxything Yeah their names are George W. Bush and Dick Chaney.
wiccanmoonman 5 months ago
@Impess99 The Holocaust was 70 years ago, tell the judicial system to stop doing trials for the murder of foreigners. This murdered 3,000 innocent americans on our soil
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
These buildings are not constructed like the WTC, with a central spine and outer load bearing walls. And if one is doing a demo it matters not where you start as long as you remove the mass below so things "can progress". There are essentially no concrete and no office contents remaining. All of it was pulverized in mid air. It was almost impossible to find even one filing cabinet at the WTC. Thats how much is Missing at the WTC. Including some 1000 people pulverized as well. 220 acres gone
IExposeMormonism 7 months ago 8
@IExposeMormonism The North Tower has a concrete core that was most likely demolished with the use of an elaborate amount of C4 or some other variant of plastic explosives. Tons of rebarb was found in the debris...even 2 pictures conform a small portion standing of the concrete core covered with rebarb.
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
we can call fox or cnn news so they can also put a commercial plane hitting this tower.before collapse.
bernuga 7 months ago
I guess this was another of the many top down demolitions Michael Shermer conveniently ignored when he went on Glen Beck and said all demolitions happen from the bottom up.
JustinSage 7 months ago
great job, justl like 911
MrGRT99 10 months ago 21
This is NO steel twin towers at all
Headshothorror4488 11 months ago
@sallyygo, U are the only crazy one with conspiracy, #7 ? # 5 on fire worse never fell?
Headshothorror4488 11 months ago
Not steel framed buildings, and obviously controlled demolition. 911 was an inside job
fish5133 1 year ago
For all you 9/11 conspiracy nuts out there please watch this *definitive* explanation of a physics behind a GRAVITY driven collapse and how it relates to WTC 1,2 .... you can not argue with this! This is elementary science! You have to watch this.
watch?v=NiHeCjZlkr8
See also this video about an orange (no really)
watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk
And this advert which aired on some NY TV station.
watch?v=hHIj9wzbYGQ
And this message to all you crazy 'truthers' out there
watch?v=4A7fgg1vjTQ
sallygo1234 1 year ago
xxcurn your wrong, they would fall to the side and wouldn't pulverize everything. At-least with a huge very tall building , wont work
Headshothorror4488 1 year ago
This building wasn't pulled down by bulldozers, instead they used hydrolic rams to push the walls out on one floor, using the building weight to crush the floors below.
xxcurnuxx 1 year ago
@amrcnidiot69 so these are not the twin towers?
flowpen 1 year ago
to the people talking about 9/11 on THIS video have serious issues
amrcnidiot69 1 year ago 3
@amrcnidiot69 you got issues jerk off... your either stupid or an act of treason
THXcooper 6 months ago
@amrcnidiot69
Yeah, it's called thinking.
RAMB0IV 5 months ago
@amrcnidiot69 why? because we question the bs excuse that the main stream media and govt tried to force feed us?
truthspeaks01 3 months ago
Israel runs the US. Nov 24, 2010: Michael Chertoff former head of Homeland Security came public on National Public Radio when he said that he now invests in companies that build the naked body scanners in airports.
Go to the NPR website and search for the transcript of the interview "Chertoff Seeks Full-Body Scanners At Airports"
Michael Chertoff is pushing for full-body scanners to be installed at airports in the wake of the attempted terrorist attack aboard an airliner on Christmas Day.
TheTracker11rt 1 year ago
Anybody else got goosebumps seeing this?
Maymona13 1 year ago
@woddleduck123 Pity there were no bulldozers/cables at the wtc though, eh?
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@woddleduck123 ~ of course they look alike ....... it's because of something called GRAVITY !!!!!!!
LOLCATS3111 1 year ago
@LOLCATS3111 Get off this board. Everyone, LOLCATS is a known Zionist disinformation agent.
TheTracker11rt 1 year ago
@TheTracker11rt ~ of course evreybody who disagrees with you is a "zionist disinformation agent" !!!! why is it that most anti-Semetic scumbags are also 9/11 Twoof Tards !?!?!??!?!
LOLCATS3111 1 year ago
@LOLCATS3111 I'm done coming to Youtube. It sucks. It's like TV. Full of junk.
TheTracker11rt 1 year ago
Dropped exactly like WTC, when will these ignorant war-loving americans wake up to this fact??
lisatostado 1 year ago
@lisatostado Yes, because there are cables long enough to attach to bulldozers at the wtc site.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
the same company that demolished the twin towers...
RizeOrDie 2 years ago
@RizeOrDie lol that building came down like that becuz it was pulled down by bulldozers dumbass. any top down demo u see done with explosive however looks nothing like that.
baezalejandro 1 year ago
@baezalejandro i doubt it
RizeOrDie 1 year ago
@RizeOrDie With super epically long cables and ultra strong bulldozers!
Clarrisani 1 year ago
anyone know what the music is ?
peterhind 2 years ago
@peterhind : song is Clubbed to death by Rob dougan. its off the matrix soundtrack
RevolutionNo1 2 years ago
Thanks. great music.
peterhind 2 years ago