Added: 5 years ago
From: sobe104839
Views: 2,488
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (106)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol! you think a little boy like you can debunk us revisionists? you're so immaturego back to watching cartoons and leave this work to adults! DENIERBUD RULES!!!

  • @MaryStewart Lol ever heard of computer programs? You can clearly hear this voice is a modified voice. You can download free programs that do that with 1 click of a button. You fail.

  • German railways today admitted the central role its Nazi-era predecessor played in the Holocaust, saying that without the cooperation of the network the systematic murder of millions of people could never have happened.

    Launching its first ever touring exhibition about the Holocaust, the state rail company Deutsche Bahn (DB) said the tracks and freight of the Reichsbahn were integral to the Nazis' extermination plan.

  • why use a kids voice?

    Hardly objective is it?

  • I wouldnt call myself a "deniar" ..but I do have some serious questions..espec about Treblinka.

  • Correction: 50 mile train trip, not 50km.

  • Sobe,

    Im guessing that the 50km train trip, from Warsaw to Treblinka, would have taken an hour or less. Would the Germans really have a train travel for an hour, and then wait a number of days before unloading? Did they have that much spare freight capacity in 1942? Wouldn't they have got the people off, under guard if necessary, and quickly moved on?

  • i am sad that the original holocaust denial movie has been banned.

    <This kid shoundt be involved in filmmaking.

  • DEBUNKED????LOL silly child .. grow hair.

  • And guess what those kids are DYING in Somalia for drinking their own damn urine. IT SAYS IT IN THE DAMN ARTICLE.

  • YES IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE DRINKING URINE DEHYDRATES YOU BECAUSE THERE ARE SALTS IN URINE. Drink a nice glass of high concentrated salt water and see how thirsty you are after 30min. God anyone who has swallowed ocean water knows this you fucking moron research before you speak. Also get the kid voice out of here, how irresponsible.

  • Anyone who has ever done even the tiniest bit of original research (thus discounting all denier liars) will note that all witnesses refer to the begging for water. People could theoretically take food from the ghettos but there was not any. In Warsaw alone around 100,000 died of starvation or diseases related to starvation.

  • What is the source for this because in the document quoted in Kraków that is not written anywhere.

    Did you make this up in true denier liar tradition?

  • thats not what it says...it mentions how prussian blue can't be used as a measure of cyanide used.

  • Do you know the meaning of SIEG HEIL?

    Let's start from there.

    And Nazis are not Neonazis.

  • Neo Nazis are not Nazis. Remember that.

    Sieg Heil!

  • It didn

    t happen! Herr Hitler was a kind man, a wonderful man, he loved animals and people, he was a patriot.

  • I have serious doubts about the Holocaust. If it happened, why it is forbidden to inquire about it?

    Very strange, indeed!

    Sieg Heil!

  • Mr. Hitler Kisser,

    You just made the logical fallacy known as a "non=sequitur" above. It means "does not follow", i.e., just because making idiotic claims about a historical event in some countries is forbidden doesn't mean it didn't happen.

  • I have my doubts about the Holocaust.

  • Then you have your doubts about reality itself.

  • Wtf? Denierbuds point was not anything about being beaten, his point was why give the prisoners a towel and soap if your just going to immediately gas them.

  • Illusion and questioning why they did it doesn't prove that they didn't.

  • Are you guys happy denierbud was censored? I bet you are.

  • I'm not happy about it, because it gives you idiots the false argument of persecution.

  • I agree with you cyberweirdo - but it appears that there are no shorteage of retards who comment on youtube and most of them have an addiction to holocaust videos for the wrong reasons. They are a sad pathogical bunch motivated by their hatred of the Jews.

  • Exactamundo, friend.

  • So at the end you said that Hilberg and Arad left it out of their books because the report was made over a year since treblinka was dismantled, but it is still the first report, all the reports were after the soviet report so how could you say that it is resonable to leave it out because of the time it was made if it was the first report?

  • As I said in the video, as Arad and Hilberg's books primarily focus on the extermination of the Jews, it is somewhat extraneous to talk about what happened a year after the mass killing stopped and nine months after the camp had been completely destroyed by the SS. You haven't shown that the mere fact that it (Soviet report) was the first report means that it must be mentioned by Arad or Hilberg.

  • All the movies claiming to debunk the One Third of The Holocaust are meant to change your mind with one sided information, there is no real evidence to debunk them, and they leave out important parts of the movie.

    IF it was really debunking the movie, then they would have done what the MOVIE told them to do-which is to submit a written essay regarding each chapter to CODOHdotCOM. If they really did have their facts straight then they would write the essay and submit it-wich has not been done.

  • Yawn. How about we see appleguy show evidence for his claim that my videos are one-sided? I show both sides, including what Bud said. I didn't write a rebuttal because that has already been done at the Holocaust controversies blog (google that with "denierbud"). I don't dance to your tune.

  • Irony is great, isn't it?

  • I just wanted to let you know that you are doing a great job putting these "REVISIONISTS" back in there places

  • thanks.

  • you havent debunked any thing

  • Ahh, the little yelper claims so, so it must be the truth. Great methodology.

  • See comment above, reply to appleguy77.

  • how old are you?

    12? Really? Hmm, who am I gonna trust, you, or a guy that has actually done a ton of research?

  • I'm not 12. You are employing the logical fallacy known as ovverreliance on authorities. All my claims are painstakingly sourced; the sources being mainly from Holocaust historians who have researched this a lot better than me. Oh yeah, and is the "guy that has actually done a ton of research" supposed to be denierbud? Sorry to burst your bubble, but he really didn't do his homework, at least not as well as I did.

  • they used germany as they are america

  • What?

  • Sobe - it would be easy to dismiss the deniers as the crackpots that they are - but the danger is that new modern day Hitlers like Ahmeddenjad the Iranian President hosts them in Tehran, and is in the midst of developing nuclear weapons and declares his intention to wipe out Israel. There is the danger of the World sleepwalking towards a second genocide. He who forgets the past is condemned to re-live it !

  • You're confusing anti-Semetism, the veracity of the Holocaust, Jews and Israelis. Noticing that some fundamental aspects of the Holocaust are simply impossible doesn't make you anti-Semetic.

  • Yawn. I don't call someone an antisemite without proof. We have proof that Graf, Porter, Berg, etc are antisemites or nazy sumpathizers.

  • You are right Sobe - the Deniers exhaust ones patience and I can't deny it - I find them offensive. I lost two grandparents at Auschwitz.

  • I lost a few relatives in Aushwitz-Birkenau. why? Just because they were Jews. I've always found it funny how antisemites, in their nonsense, claim that "Jewry' "stabbed Germany in the back" after WWI. Actually 100,000+ German Jews fought bravely and proudly for the motherland. Whowould have known that so many crackpots would accuse them of "stabbing Germany in the back" decades later...

  • Who blames the Jews for Germany's defeat in the Great War? Right after the war people blamed the Jews for Germany's defeat but today? Why would an anti-Semite today rant about the Jews stabbing Germany in the back in 1918? If Germany hadn't lost the war, Hitler would have never come to power. Then where would they be today?

  • Were they from the Botswanan side of the family?

  • The best advice to the Deniers (Smelly included) is to get a life or a library card. Go to college and get an education. Its amazing what they can learn from reading a few books at their local library. I don't know what Smellys problem really is?

    Maybe he needs to get laid!

  • Smelly the antisemitic propagandist can't stay away.Holocaust denial is an assault on truth and memory.The Soviet Union collapsed in 1989 but the neo-nazi deniers are as active as ever with their lies and distortions. They find allies in rogue regimes like the President of Iran and Klansmen like Duke. They address neo-nazi rallies and insult everyones intelligence when there are survivors still alive.You are Smelly a despicable lier who deserve everyones contempt.

  • Non sequitur. Your facts are uncoordinated.

  • Star Trek. The episode "The Changling" Nomad.

    But what the Hell are you talking about?

  • Historicrecord, sorry you exposed yourself in answering a simple question. You can't blame me for your slip. That doesn't make me a liar. Nothing in my profile is inaccurate. You, on the other hand, either lied about your age or about your Zundel trial experience. Unless you can prove hookednose and deniarbud are the same person, we can all assume you lied about that too. Name calling and spreading malicious disinformation is a violation of youtubes policy against hate speech.

  • BTW, this kind of response proves the deniars correct. When confronted with facts, the pro-Holocausters respond emotionally, hurling the anti-semetic label and stooping to vicious personal attacks instead of providing reasoned answers. Of course legislation against Denial sweeping the world also proves the Holocaust is a lie. After all, if the Holocaust happened, you wouldn't need to make it illegal to say it didn't happen. You would just provide proof that it did.

  • Nonsense. I don't respond emotionally; if historicrecord did, it's because he is offended by your tastelessness. BTW, I OPPOSE laws that jail denial.

  • I have never posted anything that was in poor taste, unless you consider difference of opinion or questioning aspects of the Holocaust story to be in poor taste. Historicrecord is offended because I inadvertendly exposed his lack of truthiness between his youtube profile and his stated accomplishments. His reaction to me and his smellyphobic comments have nothing to do with my on-topic commentary.

  • I don't consider "difference of opinion" tastlessness or rudeness.

  • BTW, I recognize and appreciate your views on denial legislation. Only a person who fears open debate would support such legislation and I would never accuse you of shying away from open debate.

  • "kind of reponse proves deniers correct". If that is true about emotional responses, I can go through all the denier posts and comments on youtube, sift through the mountain of "fuck off yid", "thieving jew" and "kike", then I can prove (by your definition) the denier argument was false from day one.

  • I've gotten called a Jew so many times now.

    However: I wonder when did humans acquire the ability to tell one other's religion through YouTube comments. I have yet to learn this new ability that all these wonderful antisemites posess.

    lol. What's next, telepathy?

  • It's true that there are idiots even among the deniers but the denier comments are far calmer and rational than the pro-Holocausters--at least among the comments to sobe104839's videos. I can't speak for all of youtube but here a denier is more likely to be called an anti-Semite than a pro-Holocauster is a 'fucking yid'

  • If I call someone an antisemite, it's because I have evidence for it. For example look at Zahn's comments/profile, or Emnerd's comments on episode 4...

  • Smellwhig for you care to identify yourself for the anti-semitic racist you are. The comments sections of Youtube is full of racists, neo-nazi's and other extremists who are permitted to spout their hatred and incite violence against members of minorities totally unabated.You spout your hatred under the anonymous guise of smellwhig which probably describes your views quite accurately. I'm entitled to the same anonymity to rebut your despicable views.

  • My question could be seen as accusing you of being a liar hiding behind a wall of anonymity or it could be an expression of surprise for your precociousness. I didn't get interested in WWII or the Holocaust until I was nine and I have met very few who got into it earlier. As such, I was asking the latter. Your answer, however, tells me it was the former.

  • Too Funny!

  • I visited Toronto in the Summer of 1985 and attended a Zundel appeal against extradition. . He had a long run as did Irving who was tolerated in the UK but banned in Austria and imprisoned by Germany because they had direct experience of the Nazi's and understood what the revisionists were all about. Holocaust deniers are essentially white supremacists who believe in Jewish conspiracies. Its a neo-nazi ideology to whitewash the past - a continuation of their anti-jewish hatred.

  • historicrecord you say "I visited Toronto in the Summer of 1985 and attended a Zundel appeal against extradition." Your profile says you're a 28 year old living in Botswana. You were following Holocaust Denial court cases when you were six years old?!?

  • It took more than 20 years to finally extradite Zundel to Germany. Irving published his lies and falsified history for over 40 years.Inspite of losing the libel action he launched against Lipstadt and being totally discredited he had a long run. The deniers have had a long run on their assault on memory having mocked the victims of the worst genocide in history.

  • Irving used to be called a Historian. However, he wasn't a historian after the Lipstadt trial. He was proven to be a racist, antisemite and Neo-Nazi who falsified evidence for his own ideological reasons. For example, he accepted the forged <i>Tagesbefehl 47<i> report which mentioned a ridiculous Dresden death toll: 200,000. And yet Holocaust deniers still accept this false death toll, because their faith guides them to believe so.

  • Why are you not debunking parts 18 & 19 Physical Evidence and the Persecution of Revisionists in Europe? Are you afraid to draw attention to that section of the movie, are are you unable to debunk those parts, which seem to be the most important arguments against a Holocaust?

  • In due time. I am currently working on Nuremberg. After that I plan to do a re-do of my part 22.

  • Denierbud posts under the pseudonym "hookednose".

    He is a rabid antisemite preying on the gullibe and naive who is seeking to re-write history to serve his Far Right agenda and mock the memory of the victims.

    Bravo Sobe - for exposing this creep.

  • Thank you. Can you give me more info on Bud's pseudonym?

  • It was in the comments section of one of the video's -

    I didn't record which, but when I followed the link it led back to denierbuds website. It shouldn't be altogether surprising since holocaust denial essentially is the propagation of Jewish conspiracy theories which amounts to anti-semitic hate mongering.

  • Holocaust denial isn't about Jewish conspiracy theories. The Holocaust myth is a result of a Soviet disinformation campaign to divert the world's attention from Stalin's crimes. Israel has benefited from it and must either perpetuate it or return the 50 billion or so that Germany has paid to them. But it wasn't STARTED by any Zionist plot. Besides, how is not exterminating 6,000,000 Jews anti-semetic?

  • Again, smellwig, give evidence! You claim that this hoax was perpetrated by "Soviet disinformation". Were's eyewitness testimony, docs? Anything?!

  • How do you know it's the same guy?

  • I think that very few people on the trains would have had food. A few hundred were offered bread and jam if they turned up at the Umschlagplatz in Warsaw but this number is miniscule compared to the overall figure.

  • I would not call this a rebuttal.. After watchine One Third Of the Holocaust and digging up all the material which can be found on revisionism, I am now convinced that the Holocaust is a lie. More people who are discovering these materials will follow I´m sure.

  • Like the true believer pokertje is, pokertje cannot point out <b>one single thing</b> wrong in this chapter. He thinks that by writing that this chapter is not a rebuttal that my chapter is debunked. XD

  • "If Jews drank urine it is because they like it."

    Thanks for emptying your mind of its miserable and pathetic contents and showing what you crave in your spare time.

  • Common knowledge or not, urine does have a high sodium content and would not quench thirst effectively, although water concentration in urine varies considerably. However, Sharing urine would quickly render the urine useless at quenching thirst. Dehydration must be severe before people resort to drinking urine. If Jews drank urine it is because they like it.

  • The Jews in the Warschau transports in 1942 <b>were</b> severely dehydrated. And so what is urine has a high sodium content? Again, was this really "common knowledge"? See comment below-->

  • "And so what is urine has a high sodium content?"

    A high sodium content means it won't quench your thirst. Next time you're thirsty, dissolve a tablespoon of salt into a glass of water and drink it. If you're still thirsty, do it again. Keep repeating until your thirst is quenched. You'll find out why sodium content matters.

  • I wasn't insinuating that sodium content doesn't matter; I was insinuating that this needn't be "common knowledge" and even if it was, would a Jew half out of his mind with thirst take that into account?

  • Desperate men take desperate measures so if somebody says he was so thirsty he drank urine, he's not necessarily lying.

    But, if he says it quenched his thirst or that the only thing anybody on the train had to drink for days on end was urine, he's lying.

  • Well, I don't remember Piskorz (the Treblinka survivor that Bud quoted) saying that the urine quenched his thirst or whatever.

  • I did not know that urine hydrates and has high sodium content.

    I do however know that beer hydrates and that does not stop people drinking that.

    If I get shipwrecked then I shall not drink my urine.

    No doubt the people on the trains were far better educated than me.

  • "If Jews drank urine it is because they like it."

    It's times like these I wish it were possible to strangle people via the Internet. Seriously.

  • I agree. What kind of moron will write crap like that?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more