Great cover of a great song from a great writer! Lennon was a tremendous person as well as a talented musician. The world will forever miss him, but thanks to the younger generation, such as, Cold War Kids, he will never be forgotten. From a very old Beatles fan. Good job!
Stop saying it's too fast people. Most covers sound different than the original. What do you want them to do, cover it note for note? Yeah... Let's look at some of the greatest covers ever. Hendrix covering Bob Dylan's "Along the Watchtower". Yeah that was similar right? lol It's there version... I like it very much personally. I like how they changed it. You guys don't have too. Your not being forced to listen.
Pamperspete, what kind of username is that? fucking douche bag shut the fuck up. you obviously haven't heard any of their music, its anything BUT cookie cutter. ass hat
Im sure this band loves and respects lennon's song, thats not the point. The point is the disrespect of people trying to put forth and argument that this COVER is better than the original, all im trying to do is explain that no cover can ever be "better" than any original because it is just a copy that appeals to a fragment of the people of this generation. If your going to cover a legend, do it for the people not for your own ego. Which is what this version sounds like. All ego and no lennon.
Are you kidding me? These guys are champs and they don't play that way. Cold War Kids egotistical? You oughta check out their album, because that is definitely not their style.
If anyone thinks this is a better version, its not. Because its not the exact version it is a fake, copied version of how it was intended to sound. The only way any version would be better than any original is if the original song writer was playing it better.
If you think music can't be improved by artists other than the original writer, you clearly have a narrow musical horizon. There are millions of bad covers, but this isn´t one of them. Yes, I think it´s an improvement of the original. Cold War Kids took the song, treated it with respect, and improved the way John Lennon had intended it to be. Plus: they updated it to the 2000's. That's why this song is thát good.
Narrow musical horizon? I was classically trained since the age of 5. I dont see why people like you feel the need to "update" the integrity of the music to this generation? Why? So people with low attention spans and elevated levels of hormones can puch eachother in the face to it? Your opinion is your opinion but mine remains, unless your last name is lennon, you have no buisness changing the integrity of this song. Perhaps if they played it a little slower and the drummer was way better.
You're disrespecting the artist that covers the song. You're talking about a fake. A pure copy. Well this isn't a pure copy. This is a song treated with respect, giving it Cold War Kids ingrediënts, while improving the integrity of the song. That's what they did, and if you don't like that: piss off and don't listen to it.
O, and btw: it's cerebrum. Not ceribrum. But I guess they didn't teach you that in your classical training.
Well, if they play it slower and different that makes it a copy and a fake. They give it their own twist, while respecting Lennon's song. You'd have to be deaf not to hear (or see) how they respect him.
I dont care if they respect him, its not about the band its about the people who think this crappy version is better than the original lennon version because it is "updated" to fit the angst of this generation. And I dont see why you would point out rhetoric and meaningless key points like spelling errors. As if it does'nt happen trillions of times a day? As if you have nothing better to do but google words and correct people? Its pathetic.
Better than john lennons version? I hate when people say things are better than the original version, its so stupid. The original version is the way its SUPPOSE to be you idiot, there is no better or more accurate version. It IS the best version becuase it is the exact way it was inteded to be. Jesus christ.
Ive tried everywhere to get the Live In New York 72 concert on dvd,there was only so many copies made in the late 80s or early 90s when dvds started,I know its available on VHS but Id rather have DVD,so if anyones got one to sell I WANT IT!!!!!
fantastic cover
UltimateVenom 11 months ago
Great cover of a great song from a great writer! Lennon was a tremendous person as well as a talented musician. The world will forever miss him, but thanks to the younger generation, such as, Cold War Kids, he will never be forgotten. From a very old Beatles fan. Good job!
thegolfnut52 1 year ago
Stop saying it's too fast people. Most covers sound different than the original. What do you want them to do, cover it note for note? Yeah... Let's look at some of the greatest covers ever. Hendrix covering Bob Dylan's "Along the Watchtower". Yeah that was similar right? lol It's there version... I like it very much personally. I like how they changed it. You guys don't have too. Your not being forced to listen.
richig761 1 year ago
this is my favorite band ever them modest mouse, Beirut, the dodos, animal collective
TheRiteOne100 1 year ago
Comment removed
electrosquid 2 years ago
toooooooooofast
hahahahaha23 2 years ago
Pamperspete, what kind of username is that? fucking douche bag shut the fuck up. you obviously haven't heard any of their music, its anything BUT cookie cutter. ass hat
patrickmcannally 2 years ago 3
totally agree, cold war kids are in no way cookie cutter. and they definitely don't suck either. saw them at lolla and they killed that shit
and1bball888 2 years ago
Here, here!
PutOutTheFireBoys 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
These guys fuckin' SUCK! Just some more mass produced,cookie cutter wannabe rockers. Cold War Kids? Yeah! They're a real popular group.
PampersPete 2 years ago
good cover from a huge lennon fan
richig761 3 years ago 6
Great song and not a bad cover of it.
x24z26 3 years ago
good cover!!!
zachflame123 3 years ago
Great cover; this is a good song for them
doggman54 3 years ago
It's good, i wish he had let loose with the screaming more.
mattmill88 3 years ago
this ones better :)
electrosquid 3 years ago
why cant they both just be good versions?
CaptainAwesome1234 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
well, ya know. it was a good try. they didn't have a chance. the song just ate em up. they should stick to their muffins.
sugarbustersforkids 3 years ago
I don't like this band but it's a pretty good cover.
LumberjackDeChristo 3 years ago
hey, it's music, it's subjective, and therefore there is no right or wrong, just opinions and some very angry people. get over it.
thekman798 4 years ago
Im sure this band loves and respects lennon's song, thats not the point. The point is the disrespect of people trying to put forth and argument that this COVER is better than the original, all im trying to do is explain that no cover can ever be "better" than any original because it is just a copy that appeals to a fragment of the people of this generation. If your going to cover a legend, do it for the people not for your own ego. Which is what this version sounds like. All ego and no lennon.
vintijborn 4 years ago
why dont you slam lennon for doing elvis? your an pompous idiot. I love lennon and im good with this. great version
paso123 4 years ago 9
Are you kidding me? These guys are champs and they don't play that way. Cold War Kids egotistical? You oughta check out their album, because that is definitely not their style.
HumbleHero12289 3 years ago 4
If anyone thinks this is a better version, its not. Because its not the exact version it is a fake, copied version of how it was intended to sound. The only way any version would be better than any original is if the original song writer was playing it better.
vintijborn 4 years ago
If you think music can't be improved by artists other than the original writer, you clearly have a narrow musical horizon. There are millions of bad covers, but this isn´t one of them. Yes, I think it´s an improvement of the original. Cold War Kids took the song, treated it with respect, and improved the way John Lennon had intended it to be. Plus: they updated it to the 2000's. That's why this song is thát good.
chomponthis2005 4 years ago
Narrow musical horizon? I was classically trained since the age of 5. I dont see why people like you feel the need to "update" the integrity of the music to this generation? Why? So people with low attention spans and elevated levels of hormones can puch eachother in the face to it? Your opinion is your opinion but mine remains, unless your last name is lennon, you have no buisness changing the integrity of this song. Perhaps if they played it a little slower and the drummer was way better.
vintijborn 4 years ago
You're disrespecting the artist that covers the song. You're talking about a fake. A pure copy. Well this isn't a pure copy. This is a song treated with respect, giving it Cold War Kids ingrediënts, while improving the integrity of the song. That's what they did, and if you don't like that: piss off and don't listen to it.
O, and btw: it's cerebrum. Not ceribrum. But I guess they didn't teach you that in your classical training.
chomponthis2005 4 years ago
Well, if they play it slower and different that makes it a copy and a fake. They give it their own twist, while respecting Lennon's song. You'd have to be deaf not to hear (or see) how they respect him.
chomponthis2005 4 years ago
I dont care if they respect him, its not about the band its about the people who think this crappy version is better than the original lennon version because it is "updated" to fit the angst of this generation. And I dont see why you would point out rhetoric and meaningless key points like spelling errors. As if it does'nt happen trillions of times a day? As if you have nothing better to do but google words and correct people? Its pathetic.
vintijborn 4 years ago
Better than john lennons version? I hate when people say things are better than the original version, its so stupid. The original version is the way its SUPPOSE to be you idiot, there is no better or more accurate version. It IS the best version becuase it is the exact way it was inteded to be. Jesus christ.
vintijborn 4 years ago
Besides, no reason calling people stupid or idiots because you disagree with their musical opinion. Pretty weak.
chomponthis2005 4 years ago
Ill tell you whats weak, the mass of your ceribrum.
vintijborn 4 years ago
This is the most brilliant cover in years. Better than John Lennon's version if you ask me. Great flow, better guitarwork and outstanding singing!
Makes you feel like whenever you screw up, or just can't seem to get that lovely girl... "oh well, well, well".
Indeed well well well done!
chomponthis2005 4 years ago
this is too fast. no me gusta.
sometimesoonfan 4 years ago
not bad at all i must say. enthusiastic performance
Douglust 4 years ago
well well well
mikeymodavis123 4 years ago
Ive tried everywhere to get the Live In New York 72 concert on dvd,there was only so many copies made in the late 80s or early 90s when dvds started,I know its available on VHS but Id rather have DVD,so if anyones got one to sell I WANT IT!!!!!
19rocknrollcircus68 4 years ago
yeah,i like this but im surprised the original aint on utube
19rocknrollcircus68 4 years ago
Me too, someone should put the New York '72 version up!
Electronicbox 4 years ago
0307 0020 0002 3327 6498
geneoism 4 years ago
What does that mean?
Electronicbox 4 years ago
I'm a Lennonologist and this is a GREAT cover.
A bad cover is U2's "Instant Karma"
jasonriggs 4 years ago
that was a damn good cover. well well well done.
paulonthepiano 4 years ago
This version sounds too funky. Not Grungy enough.
segould 4 years ago
Well done
Rock6well 4 years ago
Very well done. Great choice in a song to cover.
flana001 5 years ago