Congress agrees with the courts on what the definition of 'income' is.
The United States Supreme Court and Congress define income as: “undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion,” Commissioner v. Glenshaw GlassCo., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955).
“Plaintiff argues he is entitled to relief because the Code does not define income. The United States, however, is correct that “income” is afforded its every day usage as any gain derived from capital, labor, or both combined. See United States v. Richards, 723 F.2d 646, 648 (6th Cir. 1983). In addition, the Code explicitly defines “gross income”, from which taxable income is computed, as including compensation for services, i.e., wages.”
The1954 Code has been superceded by the 18986 Code: Public Law 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085. The word 'income' does not NEED to be defined, copious examples are given in Section 61. Your paycheck, i.e. 'compensation for services", is specifically included.
Any argument based on Citizenship is moot, the income tax is imposed on individuals.
No, I just cited a Supreme Court case, making it the highest case law there is. Even at the time there were no problems cited with the 16th Amendment, it's all a fairly recent invention.
The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 was passed by both houses of Congress as House Resolution 8300, and was signed by President Eisenhower on August 16, 1954, at about 9:45 a.m., becoming Public Law 83-591, 68A Stat. 3. The Internal Revenue Code (Title 26) is now known as the “Internal Revenue Code of 1986” as a result of changes made by Public Law 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085 (10/22/1986).
“The Sixteenth Amendment declares that Congress shall have power to levy and collect taxes on income, ‘from whatever source derived’ without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration. It was not the purpose or the effect of that amendment to bring any new subject within the taxing power. Congress already had the power to tax all incomes.”
Sorry, the Supreme Court does not agree with you. They said that Congress always had the ability to tax income, after the 16th it did not have to be apportioned.
Let us NOT forget. The government is suppose to be run by the people, not vice versa. There is NO crime against the government, only the people. Murder, rape, robbery etc. These are crimes against people the government must enact punishment upon. Not paying taxes is NOT a reason to place a United States Citizen in prison for. Again the government is employed by us. Do you think you have the right to imprison your boss if he dont give you a raise?
So, change your claim to income tax crime being a crime against all of the People of the States. 99.99% of those Citizens say it IS a crime and we CAN put criminals in jail.
COURT. An agency of the sovereign created by it directly or indirectly under its authority, consisting of one or more officers, established and maintained for the purpose of hearing and determining issues of law and fact regarding legal rights and alleged violations thereof, and of applying the sanctions of the law, authorized to exercise its powers in the course of law at times and places previously determined by lawful authority. [Isbill v. Stovall, Tex.Civ.App., 92 S.W.2d 1067, 1070 {BLK's4th
I am one of the people (sovereign) in this court of record (common law court of my own making as sovereign) declare the IRS is exceeding it's jurisdiction and trespassing on my rights. "...at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves....". CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL (1793) pp471-472.
Have fun in your make believe 'court'. It has no authority in this country. The Supreme Court says that the IRS is not violating your rights when it collects income tax.
I see ret u have don't done your homework like scout2 told you too....time to wake up buddy!!! Ret is a great example of what is refereed to as one on the sheeple!!!
You can easily prove there is no law. send IRS a letter NOTICE AND DEMAND to show me where in USC 26 is "income" defined? Do I have to pay IRS taxes if I'm not a government employee? If I don't live in DC or the Federal Zone territories (Puerto Rico, Virgin Isles, American Somoa). When you swear under penalties of perjury you are a "U.S. individual income tax return' and 'label' and other secret i.d.s where you claim to be a "taxpayer" or employee....you just became liable by your own words
LOL!! Title 26 section 1 imposes the income tax. Gross and Taxable income are both defined, there is no requirement or reason to define the word 'income' in the law. Any U.S. Citizen living anywhere in the world is subject to income taxes. You are liable for income tax LONG before you sign anything.
@RetSquid The IRS can change any law at any time to make it in their favor. That does NOT mean it is legal. Why dont you tell the most powerful respected fore founders of this country your thinking? Tell George Washington! What do you think the founders of the CONSTITUTION would say to YOU RetSquid?
The Founders would say that the States had followed the Amendment process and that an unapportiond tax on your income was Constitutional. The income tax has ALWAYS been Constitutional, it just had to be apportioned.
@RetSquid BUZZZ!! Wrong they would arrest immediately anyone who tried to change the constitution to fit their liking. Including any new presidents, congressman or senators. The constitution is what it is. Not meant to be changed with the times or abused by power by an irresponsible government.
“Plaintiff argues he is entitled to relief because the Code does not define income. The United States, however, is correct that “income” is afforded its every day usage as any gain derived from capital, labor, or both combined. In addition, the Code explicitly defines “gross income”, from which taxable income is computed, as including compensation for services, i.e., wages.”
You can be a 14th amendment slave "subject to the jurisdiction" or you can declare sovereignty and have a lawful cause of action in court. It's all contract no law in court. You fail to object, fail to establish your rights, let them presume your under their 'jurisdiction" with out any proof. When you challenge them correctly then the only thing left is for them to be a kangaroo court operating without the law. see my site, learn more. There is no lawful tax for sovereigns constitutionally
It wasn't the IRS, it was the courts. He was selling 'anti-income tax insurance'. People paid him to take the IRS to court for collecting income tax, but he never did. He was just promoting a fraud. He would demand payment in cash or blank postal money orders so there would be no record of payments.
The term private person means a person WHO DOES NOT HAVE sovereign or other special immunity or privilege which causes the person not to be subject to legal process.
Why was Mr. Frank Brushaber considered a nonresident alien in his trial ?For "Zone" read Title 19 chapter 1 A 81 C And 81 0. There are Zones that "apply".Do a Title search on zone.
Well-settled error is a legal proposition accepted by a long line of cases.Intent and Interpretation,mistakes.Frank Brushaber did not identify his opposition correctly did he ?
Utah was a "federal State"Congress had power over it. Fed. Corp. /Brushaber was a "nonresident alien" ,therefor his profits he made from the deal WAS taxable.He made a mistake that is still quoted.That is the point.
That's what I said the deal made his profit taxable.The case should have never happened should it ?Intent,Interpretation,Mistakes.Well-settled error is a legal proposition accepted by a long line of cases.
He did not realize or know that he would be taxable because he was making a profit thru a Federal Corp.Which has the power to tax the Fed.Corp. profits, so a percentage was held back thru "withholding"and the story goes on and is still quoted and referred to in many misleading ways be it good or bad.
Like What ?The Income tax (as it is misapplied) is still a fraud .This set of Post was about intent, misinformation and mistakes.Well-settled error is a legle proposition accepted by a long line of cases. I have done my own research .
Retsquid keep it up You are doing a good job of getting people worked up to the point of revolt against such tyranny against the people.This man is Not a "crook"
You are right about the "guilty until proven innocent argument". I can't argue about that. My only point is that the icome tax is legal. I've seen the IRS be jerks to people, and in fact, have dealt with them when I was in private practice. But, if you know the Code well enough, you can use it against them.
The government alleges that they offer to prepare and file bankruptcy petitions and other court papers for customers in order to obstruct IRS law-enforcement efforts. In addition, the suit claims that Kotmair and Save-a-Patriot encourage and help members to violate tax laws by offering" insurance-like protection" for customers whose conduct results in tax-collection efforts or criminal convictions.
He's just a crook making money lying to people and selling false promises.
"... The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating". -Thomas Jefferson
"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance". -James Madison
A Fascist state masquerading as a democracy is what America has become. And its been that way for a long, long time. Keeping citizen sheep in the dark about the tyranny that rules them is extortion job one for criminal oligarchs and their Fascist machine.
Count on it.
You will rarely be fooled by the Washington-MSM circus if you do.
Control the money and you control everything that matters. This is not some exotic notion folks. Its practical reality. they also control the privately owned IRS ....its the collection service for the banks
Ben Bernanke admitted the private bank monopoly sham Federal Reserve Corp (not federal and without any reserves whatever) caused the Great Depression of 1929 in 2002 for his speech honoring Rockefeller stooge Milton Freidman:
I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You're right, we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again.
The thing is not 1 red cent of your income taxes which you work 4 months out of a year to pay, goes into any governmental programs/projects. Not 1 cent.
it all goes into the pockets of those un-federal no-reserve bastards who own you. Keep watching that filth box called TV and keep your stupid happy-selves busy with their trash, a worm has more pride and self-respect than most of you.
(I am talking to TV head idiots who love the zionist bastards trash i.e holeywood, TV, media etc, in general)!
apparently you dont know that the fake fed reserve sells money to u.s. gov. at high interest rate and working ppl are paying for the greedy bastards sometime as high as 40% on a dollar.
a few good ppl in congress try to pass HR1207 but the zionist low life bastards r blocking it. why?
please take ur head out of that filthy zionist TV and wake up. not unless ur one of them!?
there are other taxes on every damn thing from bridge to road to high gas taxes to breathing the goddamn chemtrails taxes
Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that's you and your children) in a national systm designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency
we will employ the high office of our dummy corporation to foment this plot on America
Do you like being "Human Capital"??? Executive Order No. 13037 ...
Following is Bill Clinton's executive order of March 4, 1997, on establishing a report on the federal government's ownership of Capital. including HUMAN CAPITAL..
Personally, I am not too crazy about the idea about being bought ,sold, and traded on the bond market without my knowledge
I got the idea of human ownership from the central banker scheme of "pledging" For their kind benevolent service of providing you with unpayable fiat debt notes , endless war, economic turmoil, global ignorance and a diseased population and general human suffering..... You pledge them with your chattel slavery for life ..
Control the money and you control everything that matters. This is not some exotic notion folks. Its practical reality.
Example: the Bolshevik so-called revolution was a coup bankrolled by robber barons out of New York, London and Hamburg Germany. Communism never existed but Fascism surely has. By far the most important planks of the Communist Manifesto are 1) elite control of banking (all money) 2) elite control of the media (brainwash) 3) elite control of education (brainwash) .
Has anyone here watched Aaron Russo's America Freedom To Fascism video on google before?
If not it is a must for every US citizen (or non citizen!)
These illegal bastards are In Your Face now days and know No shame whatsoever. I mean shame is a Human quality after all. Not every piece of garbage & scum of the earth knows about shame. specially these sub-human inbred imported zionist british bastards who took over USA in 1913 and used her to take over the whole damn world.
16 Amendment was never ratify, Corporations were suppose to pay taxes from their profits & surplus, not individuals from wages & labor. Health Care is against the Constitution Article 1, section 8 does not allow the gov. to run our health care system.
Retsquid.. your also a traitor who works for the enemies of humanity you represent the Babylonian system of debt slavery and everything that is wrong with planet earth Google "the ancient system of pledging" and "free man of the land" . Remove yourself and your" straw man" they deceptively created in your name from this evil luciferian swindle... Retquid... you keep paying your taxes so they can fund more chemtrails to spray on your useless eater ass
Save-A-Patriot is one of the few tax protestor scams that even most tax protestors believe is a scam. Several websites set up by victims of Save-A-Patriot actively encourage the U.S. Department of Justice to shut down this scam, and even provide on-line complaint forms about Save-A-Patriot
Title 26 is a municipal (internal) statute. it does not apply to all americans. Only to citizens of the federal government (U.S. citizens). When you start to research what a U.S. citizen, you will find that most people who say they are one, are not one. A U.S. citizen simply is a Federal citizen. A citizen of the federal state and territories.
All others are either Aliens or State Citizens (We the People).
The Federal government does not have jurisdiction over all the people of the USA.
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words person, human being, child, and individual shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
Blacks law dictionary says that a person is a natural person or a fiction. The government only has jurisdiction over the fiction. We the People are sovereign.
Just because something may be defined at 1 U.S.C doesn't mean it is also used in other codes and statutes. Words have different meanings in different codes and statutes.
Since when did the federal government have jurisdiction over the sovereigns? The constitution says the federal government has limited power, even less than the state government.
That is where it comes from. Statutes are not law, so the point of these false "laws" are power and control grabs. The government was never intended to be this big and the constitution says that the government must be overthrown if it gets to big, which it is past due for.
Multiple falacies. The federal govenment is sovereign in some things as is the state. The people are sovereign in that you can change the gov. by vote.
The constitution says nothing about overthrowing any gov.
A statute is a formal written enactment of a legislative authority that governs a country, state, city, or county.
Typically, statutes command or prohibit something, or declare policy. The word is often used to distinguish law made by legislative bodies from case law and the regulations issued by Government agencies.
Statutes are sometimes referred to as legislation or "black letter law". As a source of law, statutes are considered primary authority.
The plain language of the IRC, however, belies this assertion, stating in section 1 that a tax is hereby IMPOSED on the taxable income of every individual (emphasis added). Although plaintiff attempts to distinguish between imposing a tax and creating a liability for a tax, there is no difference. Every individual has an affirmative duty to pay taxes.
TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 1 > Subchapter B > PART I >
§ 61. Gross income defined
(a) General definition
Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items
too bad you get so little attention. our freedom fighters are dieing at our alarming rate. if you go to jail, i will fight to the death getting you out. the youth is raising up, we are rioting all over the world. in athens, in canada, they call us anarchists and punks, but we are the only youth raising up!
Even here in the U.K - our eyes are on you and our hearts are with you , we are all in this together and together we can win , spread the word , good luck
Save A Patriot Fellowship have the best income tax information anywhere. I should say "had" after this ridiculous government injuction. Because of SAPF, I know more about the Tax Code than any IRS agent or IRS attorney. Please support SAPF and Libertyworksradionetwork. We MUST get the Income Tax/IRS issue on the national airwaves. Only then will we make real changes in this tyrannical country.
John, If I go to jail because I believe in freedom. I'll know in my heart that I am in good company. As long as truth is my guiding light I will be free.
Im a Canadaian, but strangely enough I recently found out about what the government is pointing the smoking gun at THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! I am so glad there is people like you are speaking out.... The rest of america is still in the amusement park!
@YesWeTan
Congress agrees with the courts on what the definition of 'income' is.
The United States Supreme Court and Congress define income as: “undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion,” Commissioner v. Glenshaw GlassCo., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955).
RetSquid 7 months ago
@YesWeTan
“[I]f anything in our tax law is clear, it is that: ‘WAGES ARE INCOME.’ ... [A]ny contention to the contrary is patently frivolous....”
Hill v. United States
RetSquid 7 months ago
@YesWeTan
Sorry, income is is defined just as I posted.
Income is "the gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined"
EISNER v. MACOMBER , 252 U.S. 189 (1920)
RetSquid 7 months ago
How about you come up with a new argument that takes me some time to find the rebuttal to?
RetSquid 7 months ago
“Plaintiff argues he is entitled to relief because the Code does not define income. The United States, however, is correct that “income” is afforded its every day usage as any gain derived from capital, labor, or both combined. See United States v. Richards, 723 F.2d 646, 648 (6th Cir. 1983). In addition, the Code explicitly defines “gross income”, from which taxable income is computed, as including compensation for services, i.e., wages.”
Tornichio v. United States
RetSquid 7 months ago
@YesWeTan
The 16th was ratified by 38 of the States, after it was approved by their representatives in Congress, no State denies that this is true.
If you can't post the proof here, PM it to me.
Your arguments have never succeeded in a court of law, not once.
RetSquid 7 months ago
@YesWeTan
Yes, the 1954 code was superceded, made invalid, replaced, however you want to name that action.
Withholding has nothing to do with an individual's liability for income tax.
RetSquid 7 months ago
@YesWeTan
The1954 Code has been superceded by the 18986 Code: Public Law 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085. The word 'income' does not NEED to be defined, copious examples are given in Section 61. Your paycheck, i.e. 'compensation for services", is specifically included.
Any argument based on Citizenship is moot, the income tax is imposed on individuals.
RetSquid 7 months ago
@YesWeTan
No, I just cited a Supreme Court case, making it the highest case law there is. Even at the time there were no problems cited with the 16th Amendment, it's all a fairly recent invention.
RetSquid 7 months ago
The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 was passed by both houses of Congress as House Resolution 8300, and was signed by President Eisenhower on August 16, 1954, at about 9:45 a.m., becoming Public Law 83-591, 68A Stat. 3. The Internal Revenue Code (Title 26) is now known as the “Internal Revenue Code of 1986” as a result of changes made by Public Law 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085 (10/22/1986).
RetSquid 7 months ago
@YesWeTan
“The Sixteenth Amendment declares that Congress shall have power to levy and collect taxes on income, ‘from whatever source derived’ without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration. It was not the purpose or the effect of that amendment to bring any new subject within the taxing power. Congress already had the power to tax all incomes.”
Bowers v. Kerbaugh
RetSquid 7 months ago
@YesWeTan
Here is 'the law': Title 26
Section 1, imposes the tax
Section 61 defines Gross income
Section 63 defines Taxable income.
Section 6012 requires you to file a tax return if you have income of more than the exemption amount, and
Section 6151 requires you to pay the tax at the time and place fixed for the filing of your return.
RetSquid 7 months ago
@YesWeTan
Sorry, the Supreme Court does not agree with you. They said that Congress always had the ability to tax income, after the 16th it did not have to be apportioned.
RetSquid 7 months ago
i am not liable for federal taxes
i live here and an a citizen
im not a elected official or work for the government
i don't live in D,C
and i do not work for non US countries and bring the money back here
waterchildtera 1 year ago
@waterchildtera
If you are an indivudual who has over the exemption amount you owe income tax.
RetSquid 1 year ago
Let us NOT forget. The government is suppose to be run by the people, not vice versa. There is NO crime against the government, only the people. Murder, rape, robbery etc. These are crimes against people the government must enact punishment upon. Not paying taxes is NOT a reason to place a United States Citizen in prison for. Again the government is employed by us. Do you think you have the right to imprison your boss if he dont give you a raise?
straightcleaner 1 year ago
@straightcleaner
So, change your claim to income tax crime being a crime against all of the People of the States. 99.99% of those Citizens say it IS a crime and we CAN put criminals in jail.
RetSquid 1 year ago
Hmm now the government wants to take away freedom of speech?
straightcleaner 1 year ago
COURT. An agency of the sovereign created by it directly or indirectly under its authority, consisting of one or more officers, established and maintained for the purpose of hearing and determining issues of law and fact regarding legal rights and alleged violations thereof, and of applying the sanctions of the law, authorized to exercise its powers in the course of law at times and places previously determined by lawful authority. [Isbill v. Stovall, Tex.Civ.App., 92 S.W.2d 1067, 1070 {BLK's4th
immafreemann 1 year ago
I am one of the people (sovereign) in this court of record (common law court of my own making as sovereign) declare the IRS is exceeding it's jurisdiction and trespassing on my rights. "...at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves....". CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL (1793) pp471-472.
immafreemann 1 year ago
@immafreemann
Have fun in your make believe 'court'. It has no authority in this country. The Supreme Court says that the IRS is not violating your rights when it collects income tax.
RetSquid 1 year ago
I see ret u have don't done your homework like scout2 told you too....time to wake up buddy!!! Ret is a great example of what is refereed to as one on the sheeple!!!
ssupermann101shane 11 months ago
@ssupermann101shane
You seem to be living in your own delusional world.
What, exactly, have I been wrong on?
RetSquid 11 months ago
You can easily prove there is no law. send IRS a letter NOTICE AND DEMAND to show me where in USC 26 is "income" defined? Do I have to pay IRS taxes if I'm not a government employee? If I don't live in DC or the Federal Zone territories (Puerto Rico, Virgin Isles, American Somoa). When you swear under penalties of perjury you are a "U.S. individual income tax return' and 'label' and other secret i.d.s where you claim to be a "taxpayer" or employee....you just became liable by your own words
immafreemann 1 year ago
@immafreemann
LOL!! Title 26 section 1 imposes the income tax. Gross and Taxable income are both defined, there is no requirement or reason to define the word 'income' in the law. Any U.S. Citizen living anywhere in the world is subject to income taxes. You are liable for income tax LONG before you sign anything.
RetSquid 1 year ago
@RetSquid The IRS can change any law at any time to make it in their favor. That does NOT mean it is legal. Why dont you tell the most powerful respected fore founders of this country your thinking? Tell George Washington! What do you think the founders of the CONSTITUTION would say to YOU RetSquid?
straightcleaner 1 year ago
@straightcleaner
The Founders would say that the States had followed the Amendment process and that an unapportiond tax on your income was Constitutional. The income tax has ALWAYS been Constitutional, it just had to be apportioned.
RetSquid 1 year ago
@RetSquid BUZZZ!! Wrong they would arrest immediately anyone who tried to change the constitution to fit their liking. Including any new presidents, congressman or senators. The constitution is what it is. Not meant to be changed with the times or abused by power by an irresponsible government.
straightcleaner 1 year ago
@straightcleaner
If that were true, then there would be no Amendment process within the Constitution, now would there?
RetSquid 1 year ago
@immafreemann
“Plaintiff argues he is entitled to relief because the Code does not define income. The United States, however, is correct that “income” is afforded its every day usage as any gain derived from capital, labor, or both combined. In addition, the Code explicitly defines “gross income”, from which taxable income is computed, as including compensation for services, i.e., wages.”
Tornichio v. United States
RetSquid 1 year ago
@immafreemann
Here is ’the law’: Title 26
Section 1, imposes the tax
Section 61 defines Gross income
Section 63 defines Taxable income.
Section 6012 requires you to file a tax return if you have income of more than the exemption amount, and
Section 6151 requires you to pay the tax at the time and place fixed for the filing of your return.
RetSquid 1 year ago
You can be a 14th amendment slave "subject to the jurisdiction" or you can declare sovereignty and have a lawful cause of action in court. It's all contract no law in court. You fail to object, fail to establish your rights, let them presume your under their 'jurisdiction" with out any proof. When you challenge them correctly then the only thing left is for them to be a kangaroo court operating without the law. see my site, learn more. There is no lawful tax for sovereigns constitutionally
immafreemann 1 year ago
IRS can put a gag order on you? wtf since when did this happen?
ColdBoi 1 year ago
@ColdBoi
It wasn't the IRS, it was the courts. He was selling 'anti-income tax insurance'. People paid him to take the IRS to court for collecting income tax, but he never did. He was just promoting a fraud. He would demand payment in cash or blank postal money orders so there would be no record of payments.
Source: Department of Justice
FRIDAY, MAY 13, 2005
RetSquid 1 year ago
TITLE 49 SUBTITLE VII PART A subpart iii CHAPTER 453 § 45304. Maximum fees for private person services.
The Administrator of the FEDERAL Aviation Administration may establish fees....
asicit2b 2 years ago
Why are you talking about fees paid to people for aviation safety certificates?
RetSquid 2 years ago
Did you read it "WHO DOES NOT HAVE"Read what they do.Now find in the code where it says Personal income.
asicit2b 2 years ago
That language is not in that section.
This section does, but none of this has anything to do with income tax.
46317. Criminal penalty for pilots operating in air transportation
without an airmans certificate
RetSquid 2 years ago
(4) Private person
The term private person means a person WHO DOES NOT HAVE sovereign or other special immunity or privilege which causes the person not to be subject to legal process.
asicit2b 2 years ago
"Private person'
AND?
You and I do not have Sovereign Immunity, we are not Monarchs and are not above the law.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Why was Mr. Frank Brushaber considered a nonresident alien in his trial ?For "Zone" read Title 19 chapter 1 A 81 C And 81 0. There are Zones that "apply".Do a Title search on zone.
asicit2b 2 years ago
We're not talking about Title 19, or the fact that it uses a definition of distilled spirits from Title 26.
Title 19 Foreign trade zones have nothing to do with Federal income tax.
"nonresident alien"
Who ever said that he was?
RetSquid 2 years ago
It"s about jursdiction and status.
"Foreign" and "domestic"
Structured zones and on and on....
But for some reason you still mention Mr. Hendrickson.
asicit2b 2 years ago
"Mr. Hendrickson"
Because he is the biggest name behind the 'Federal zone' scam.
If you live within the borders of the United States and are not a diplomat you are under it's jusrisdiction.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Wrong assumption with Mr. Hendrickson.
Try Justice Kennedy - U.S. v. Lopez
Do a Title search on Zone also.
asicit2b 2 years ago
Title 26 has nothing to do with the 'commerce' clause.
I didn't assume anything about hendricks, he's lost every single court case and will soon be going to jail. His sentencing is set for Feb. 2010.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Title 26 Has nothing to do with commerce ??????
Do a title search on IMPOSED and see what comes up.I am not interested in what you have to say about Mr. Hendrickson.
asicit2b 2 years ago
"Title 26 Has nothing to do with commerce"
No, it has nothing to do with the commerce clause.
"Your query "imposed" returned 3655 results."
"not interested"
That is what the courts said about his whole 'Federal Zone' BS.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Nothing there i did not learn on my own.
I kinda nowed that befored I nowed what a Resquid was.
asicit2b 2 years ago
Law and belief are personal debatable concepts are they not ?Belief is the foundation of the intent.
asicit2b 2 years ago
Your beliefs about the law may be up for debate, but the law itslef is settled.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Like well-settled "law"
Well-settled error is a legal proposition accepted by a long line of cases.Intent and Interpretation,mistakes.Frank Brushaber did not identify his opposition correctly did he ?
asicit2b 2 years ago
"Well-settled error"
You may think it is wrong, but the courts do not agree with you.
"Frank Brushaber did not identify his opposition correctly did he?"
Who do you think his opposition was?
RetSquid 2 years ago
He identified Union pacific Railroad as a corp. charted by the State of Utah.
Actually it was created 1862 by an act of congress.Which made it a "domestic" Corp under the fed.realm.
asicit2b 2 years ago
If you are talking about the "Pacific Railway Act of 1862" it did nothing to incorporate the UPRR. It granted land to the RR's and authorized bonds.
As far as I can find, Utah is not mentioned in the case at all.
Whether it was a Federal corporation or one chartered by the state does not matter for Brushaber's Federal income tax.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Utah was a "federal State"Congress had power over it. Fed. Corp. /Brushaber was a "nonresident alien" ,therefor his profits he made from the deal WAS taxable.He made a mistake that is still quoted.That is the point.
asicit2b 2 years ago
Utah became a State in 1896, the case was decided in 1916. What are you trying to prove?
Where does it say that he was a "nonresident alien"? Whether he was a "nonresident alien"or not, the income from the stock would still be taxable.
RetSquid 2 years ago
That's what I said the deal made his profit taxable.The case should have never happened should it ?Intent,Interpretation,Mistakes.Well-settled error is a legal proposition accepted by a long line of cases.
asicit2b 2 years ago
"his profit taxable"
What "deal" are you talking about?
Anyway you look at it, it was taxable.
RetSquid 2 years ago
He did not realize or know that he would be taxable because he was making a profit thru a Federal Corp.Which has the power to tax the Fed.Corp. profits, so a percentage was held back thru "withholding"and the story goes on and is still quoted and referred to in many misleading ways be it good or bad.
asicit2b 2 years ago
He knew he had taxable income, he just didn't want UPRR to withhold it.
UPRR was not a Federal Corporation.
Brushaber's stock profits were taxable.
There is nothing "misleading" in it at all.
RetSquid 2 years ago
You better do some reserch on the realm that the railroad was in and what made it a "domestic" Corporation under the law.
But hay, what do i know ? Nutten write ?
asicit2b 2 years ago
""domestic" Corporation"
\If it was chartered in any of the United States, then it is 'domestic'.
"what do i know ? Nutten write"
I've been teaching you some things.
RetSquid 2 years ago
YOU have been teaching ME what ?
asicit2b 2 years ago
There is not enough room here to put it all.
RetSquid 2 years ago
"I've been teaching you some things"
Are you really Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law, Federal Witness,
and Private Attorney General ?
asicit2b 2 years ago
Never heard of him, why?
RetSquid 2 years ago
Enough room to put what ?
asicit2b 2 years ago
All of the things I've had to teach you.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Like What ?The Income tax (as it is misapplied) is still a fraud .This set of Post was about intent, misinformation and mistakes.Well-settled error is a legle proposition accepted by a long line of cases. I have done my own research .
asicit2b 2 years ago
"Well-settled error is a legle proposition accepted by a long line of cases."
That sentence does not make sense.
IF the income tax was misapplied it could be considered a fraud, but it is not (generally) misapplied.
Your 'research' goes against the law, therefore it is wrong.
RetSquid 2 years ago
"All of the things I've had to teach you"?
Again like What ?
1.)
asicit2b 2 years ago
1. Title 26 is the law.
2. It applies to you.
3. Wages/salary is income.
RetSquid 2 years ago
All "applies" within the Federal Zone.Go back several months on my post notice "applies""apply"?
asicit2b 2 years ago
"Federal Zone.'
No such thing with the income tax.
It's just a figment of Peter Hendrickson's convict imagination.
RetSquid 2 years ago
That question was for the prof.Your concept of belief is either twisted or misleading.
asicit2b 2 years ago
Retsquid keep it up You are doing a good job of getting people worked up to the point of revolt against such tyranny against the people.This man is Not a "crook"
asicit2b 2 years ago
"This man is Not a "crook""
LOL!!
Go look at his website and read the crap he is trying to sell!!
RetSquid 2 years ago
Yes he is. He's a fucking thief and he got what he deserved.
proferic 2 years ago
What makes him a thief in your opinion ?I found out with the IRS, guilty untill proven innocent is the norm.
asicit2b 2 years ago
You are right about the "guilty until proven innocent argument". I can't argue about that. My only point is that the icome tax is legal. I've seen the IRS be jerks to people, and in fact, have dealt with them when I was in private practice. But, if you know the Code well enough, you can use it against them.
proferic 2 years ago
What makes him a thief ?And why should people "get what they deserve" when they believe something to be right and true ?
asicit2b 2 years ago
" when they believe something to be right and true ?"
It matters what the law is, not your beliefs.
If I believe you should be dead and carry it out should I not get what I deserve?
"What makes him a thief" Read my post from 2 weeks ago.
RetSquid 2 years ago
The government alleges that they offer to prepare and file bankruptcy petitions and other court papers for customers in order to obstruct IRS law-enforcement efforts. In addition, the suit claims that Kotmair and Save-a-Patriot encourage and help members to violate tax laws by offering" insurance-like protection" for customers whose conduct results in tax-collection efforts or criminal convictions.
He's just a crook making money lying to people and selling false promises.
RetSquid 2 years ago
"... The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating". -Thomas Jefferson
"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance". -James Madison
finefilth 2 years ago
Its that simple and that difficult.
A Fascist state masquerading as a democracy is what America has become. And its been that way for a long, long time. Keeping citizen sheep in the dark about the tyranny that rules them is extortion job one for criminal oligarchs and their Fascist machine.
Count on it.
You will rarely be fooled by the Washington-MSM circus if you do.
finefilth 2 years ago
"what America has become"
I can partly agree with that statement, but it has nothing to do with this vid.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Control the money and you control everything that matters. This is not some exotic notion folks. Its practical reality. they also control the privately owned IRS ....its the collection service for the banks
finefilth 2 years ago
Ben Bernanke admitted the private bank monopoly sham Federal Reserve Corp (not federal and without any reserves whatever) caused the Great Depression of 1929 in 2002 for his speech honoring Rockefeller stooge Milton Freidman:
I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You're right, we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again.
finefilth 2 years ago
Sounds like Ben Bernanke trying to make a joke about people like you.
RetSquid 2 years ago
The thing is not 1 red cent of your income taxes which you work 4 months out of a year to pay, goes into any governmental programs/projects. Not 1 cent.
it all goes into the pockets of those un-federal no-reserve bastards who own you. Keep watching that filth box called TV and keep your stupid happy-selves busy with their trash, a worm has more pride and self-respect than most of you.
(I am talking to TV head idiots who love the zionist bastards trash i.e holeywood, TV, media etc, in general)!
Matey3 2 years ago
"Not 1 cent."
WRONG.
Individual income tax pays for 43% of the Federal budget.
Next time don't just parrot a line you heard somewhere.
RetSquid 2 years ago
apparently you dont know that the fake fed reserve sells money to u.s. gov. at high interest rate and working ppl are paying for the greedy bastards sometime as high as 40% on a dollar.
a few good ppl in congress try to pass HR1207 but the zionist low life bastards r blocking it. why?
please take ur head out of that filthy zionist TV and wake up. not unless ur one of them!?
there are other taxes on every damn thing from bridge to road to high gas taxes to breathing the goddamn chemtrails taxes
Matey3 2 years ago
So, you ignore facts to hang on to your racism?
You need to get your head out of your butt and do some research.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Colonel Edward Mandel House on pledging:
Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that's you and your children) in a national systm designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency
we will employ the high office of our dummy corporation to foment this plot on America
finefilth 2 years ago
Well, he died in '38 so I guess he was wrong.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Do you like being "Human Capital"??? Executive Order No. 13037 ...
Following is Bill Clinton's executive order of March 4, 1997, on establishing a report on the federal government's ownership of Capital. including HUMAN CAPITAL..
Personally, I am not too crazy about the idea about being bought ,sold, and traded on the bond market without my knowledge
finefilth 2 years ago
"Do you like being "Human Capital"???"
Ever hear of a companies 'human resource manager'?
The actual quote is "physical capital and intangible or human capital"
"Traded as bonds"???
Where did you come up with that idea???
RetSquid 2 years ago
I got the idea of human ownership from the central banker scheme of "pledging" For their kind benevolent service of providing you with unpayable fiat debt notes , endless war, economic turmoil, global ignorance and a diseased population and general human suffering..... You pledge them with your chattel slavery for life ..
finefilth 2 years ago
"You pledge them with your chattel slavery for life"
Maybe YOU, did but no one I know did.
RetSquid 2 years ago
of course they dont know it.. because its a swindle.. does a burglar tell you he is robbing you?\ didnt think so
finefilth 2 years ago
LOL!!
And all of those microwaves from the black helicopters are getting through your tinfoil hat.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Control the money and you control everything that matters. This is not some exotic notion folks. Its practical reality.
Example: the Bolshevik so-called revolution was a coup bankrolled by robber barons out of New York, London and Hamburg Germany. Communism never existed but Fascism surely has. By far the most important planks of the Communist Manifesto are 1) elite control of banking (all money) 2) elite control of the media (brainwash) 3) elite control of education (brainwash) .
finefilth 2 years ago
Colonel house was a scoundrel .. Surely, there must be a monument dedicated to him in hell.
finefilth 2 years ago
"Colonel Edward Mandel House on pledging"
And that has never happened, so what is your point? That someday it could?
RetSquid 2 years ago
Has anyone here watched Aaron Russo's America Freedom To Fascism video on google before?
If not it is a must for every US citizen (or non citizen!)
These illegal bastards are In Your Face now days and know No shame whatsoever. I mean shame is a Human quality after all. Not every piece of garbage & scum of the earth knows about shame. specially these sub-human inbred imported zionist british bastards who took over USA in 1913 and used her to take over the whole damn world.
wake the hell up ppl.
Matey3 2 years ago
Just us, justice system is 100% corrupt, they are all enchoots, everyone buy AK-47, rounds of 200, soon it will be everyones backyard. Revolt!
KamikazeKoscki 2 years ago
16 Amendment was never ratify, Corporations were suppose to pay taxes from their profits & surplus, not individuals from wages & labor. Health Care is against the Constitution Article 1, section 8 does not allow the gov. to run our health care system.
KamikazeKoscki 2 years ago
Wrong, Wrong, Right.
RetSquid 2 years ago
RetSquid
It looks like you're wrong.
Google this:
Cracking the Code - The Fascinating Truth About Taxation in America
Atom299 2 years ago
retsquid has been trolling these IRS videos for years... he is human garbage
finefilth 2 years ago
LOL!!
This from someone whose NAME is "Filth".
RetSquid 2 years ago
Retsquid.. your also a traitor who works for the enemies of humanity you represent the Babylonian system of debt slavery and everything that is wrong with planet earth Google "the ancient system of pledging" and "free man of the land" . Remove yourself and your" straw man" they deceptively created in your name from this evil luciferian swindle... Retquid... you keep paying your taxes so they can fund more chemtrails to spray on your useless eater ass
finefilth 2 years ago 2
You really need to lay off the crack pipe dude.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Google the author pete hedrickson and find out that he has lost every single tax case...does that sound like he know what is going on?
RetSquid 2 years ago
So, you don't think you are a person?
How about an individual?
Either way you have to pay income tax.
RetSquid 2 years ago
"a Tax Imposed on who and why ?"
Read what I posted in title 26 and it will tell you 'who'.
Why? Because it is the law.
RetSquid 2 years ago
TITLE 26, Subtitle A, CHAPTER 1, Subchapter A, PART I,
§ 1. Tax imposed
There is hereby imposed a tax determined in accordance with the following table[s]:
RetSquid 2 years ago
Save-A-Patriot is one of the few tax protestor scams that even most tax protestors believe is a scam. Several websites set up by victims of Save-A-Patriot actively encourage the U.S. Department of Justice to shut down this scam, and even provide on-line complaint forms about Save-A-Patriot
RetSquid 2 years ago
If you recieve over a certain amount of compensation for your labor then you have to pay.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Title 26 is a municipal (internal) statute. it does not apply to all americans. Only to citizens of the federal government (U.S. citizens). When you start to research what a U.S. citizen, you will find that most people who say they are one, are not one. A U.S. citizen simply is a Federal citizen. A citizen of the federal state and territories.
All others are either Aliens or State Citizens (We the People).
The Federal government does not have jurisdiction over all the people of the USA.
bellyoffire 2 years ago
Spread the word!
BeantownJim 2 years ago
'Define "whatever source derived"'
"In interpreting the meaning of the words i
n a revenue Act, we look to the 'ordinary, everyday senses' of the words."
Commissioner v. Soliman, 506 U.S. 168, 174 (1993)
RetSquid 2 years ago
1 U.S.C. § 8(a) states that:
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words person, human being, child, and individual shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
There is hereby imposed on...
(1) every married individual
...Unmarried individuals
Are you an individual?
RetSquid 2 years ago
Blacks law dictionary says that a person is a natural person or a fiction. The government only has jurisdiction over the fiction. We the People are sovereign.
Just because something may be defined at 1 U.S.C doesn't mean it is also used in other codes and statutes. Words have different meanings in different codes and statutes.
bellyoffire 2 years ago
"The government only has jurisdiction over the fiction"
LOL!!
Where did you get that idea?
If it didn't what would be the point of any law?
"also used in other codes and statutes"
I'm only using Title 26, nothing else.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Since when did the federal government have jurisdiction over the sovereigns? The constitution says the federal government has limited power, even less than the state government.
That is where it comes from. Statutes are not law, so the point of these false "laws" are power and control grabs. The government was never intended to be this big and the constitution says that the government must be overthrown if it gets to big, which it is past due for.
But it is has grabbed to much power.
bellyoffire 2 years ago
Multiple falacies. The federal govenment is sovereign in some things as is the state. The people are sovereign in that you can change the gov. by vote.
The constitution says nothing about overthrowing any gov.
RetSquid 2 years ago
A statute is a formal written enactment of a legislative authority that governs a country, state, city, or county.
Typically, statutes command or prohibit something, or declare policy. The word is often used to distinguish law made by legislative bodies from case law and the regulations issued by Government agencies.
Statutes are sometimes referred to as legislation or "black letter law". As a source of law, statutes are considered primary authority.
RetSquid 2 years ago
Your not only using Title 26. Show me where title 26 is in 1 U.S.C. § 8(a).
bellyoffire 2 years ago
No, I only use Title 26 for law quotes.
Why would Title 26 be in Title 1 and for what reason?
RetSquid 2 years ago
Ret Squid, 1 other question. Tax is all based on liability not on if it is imposed.
Show me where anyone is liable for income taxes under Subtitle A. Look real hard. Pull out a magnifying glass.
bellyoffire 2 years ago
The plain language of the IRC, however, belies this assertion, stating in section 1 that a tax is hereby IMPOSED on the taxable income of every individual (emphasis added). Although plaintiff attempts to distinguish between imposing a tax and creating a liability for a tax, there is no difference. Every individual has an affirmative duty to pay taxes.
Porcaro v. United States
RetSquid 2 years ago
TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 1 > Subchapter B > PART I >
§ 61. Gross income defined
(a) General definition
Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items
RetSquid 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Maybe he shouldn't be advocating criminal activity?
RetSquid 2 years ago
WHAT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY?
THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES OF THE IRS?
This man speaks the truth and people who say he's breaking the law, A LIE, are supporting the fascists who are taking away your freedom.
Anyone with a brain would realise that the IRS is scared shitless of this man and his organisation otherwise why would they try and gag him.
RetSquid you're a traitor to your own people if you support the IRS you're a stooge for these criminals.
felixq78 2 years ago
"WHAT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY?"
Not paying your taxes that are due.
RetSquid 2 years ago
too bad you get so little attention. our freedom fighters are dieing at our alarming rate. if you go to jail, i will fight to the death getting you out. the youth is raising up, we are rioting all over the world. in athens, in canada, they call us anarchists and punks, but we are the only youth raising up!
Goshdangit69 2 years ago
Even here in the U.K - our eyes are on you and our hearts are with you , we are all in this together and together we can win , spread the word , good luck
robson1144 3 years ago
Save A Patriot Fellowship have the best income tax information anywhere. I should say "had" after this ridiculous government injuction. Because of SAPF, I know more about the Tax Code than any IRS agent or IRS attorney. Please support SAPF and Libertyworksradionetwork. We MUST get the Income Tax/IRS issue on the national airwaves. Only then will we make real changes in this tyrannical country.
freenow77 3 years ago
just like they want to gag the internet... just another brick in the wall.
noncompliant2 3 years ago
John, If I go to jail because I believe in freedom. I'll know in my heart that I am in good company. As long as truth is my guiding light I will be free.
almartin77 3 years ago
I'm here cincin3. Im a very small minority indeed but im here!
pezzebob 3 years ago
Im a Canadaian, but strangely enough I recently found out about what the government is pointing the smoking gun at THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! I am so glad there is people like you are speaking out.... The rest of america is still in the amusement park!
cincin3 3 years ago