Rin Detergent vs Tide Naturals

[aryansinh]

in blue saree divya parmeshwaran and pink saree kavita patil

[aryansinh]

who is she in pink saree with divya? she is also in harpik ad and mtr ad

[aryansinh]

who is she in pink saree with divya

[TheTheRohan]

Hey,

Does anyone know the name of the lady in the pink saree ?

[abiraghu]

hey who is that gal in the blue saree?

[abiraghu]

hey who is that gal in the blue saree?

[abdulworks]

fuck y'all . its all about the money son

[DaxAdams]

Very Stupid Ad!

Atleast they could have made sumthin better!

[saub1001]

wow..sexy tide using lady in lady..she is hot..do anybody knows her name..she is a sexy bomb.

[johnrameshkhan]

@saub1001 Divya Parameshwaran

[TheBharatdarira]

look at that mother fuckers hair lmao

[taksh008]

hamara desh mahaan

saare jahaan se achaa

[taksh008]

shame on  rin they had done a very ridiculous

work

& i strongly agree with the comment made byprabhat246 & emaady

[HeavyVerbzz]

what is ridiculous about it u dumbfucker...

[neptunethought]

super 6

[prabhat246]

Well this ad wil go against RIN and tide will win people's sympathy without doing anything.

At least to me it worked that way.

[johnrameshkhan]

@prabhat246 They have given Tide free publicity.

[emaady]

Procter & gamble already filed a case in Delhi... But its too late..millions of people have seen this ad.

[amits69]

can any1 tel me the name of this cute leady

[emaady]

Her name is "Divya Parameshwar"

[arifasadat]

why these type of advertisements like rin vs tide detergents and horlicks vs complan health drinks.these type of advertisements should not be encouraged

[methewebcrawler]

Why would Rin do it?? This is so direct! Is this actually allowed?

[yoursud]

Most imp. is to notice that: this ad is not against TIDE, but the its new cheaper entrant TIDE NATURALS. Hence the disclaimer that appears in the bottom during the TVC says... " Schematic representation of superior whiteness is based on Whiteness Index test of Rin Vs Tide Naturals as tested by Independent lab"

This surely makes the ad a spendid pice of work, but which could not got portrayed properly, as this disclaimer did not clearly show up. Overall, its a beautiful ad

[yoursud]

@Majid: you can check the code of conduct from asci website. whereas this entire ad has a catch which I wasnt aware until i read a blog of my senior which mentions that theres an insight to the bottom of the screen during the entire ad which says, "As tested by Independent Lab" and "Issued in the interest of Rin Users"

[yoursud]

(e) The advertisement does not unfairly denigrate, attack or discredit other products, advertisers or advertisements directly or by implication.

Though these points are highly debatable from both PnG and HUL sides, but if other corporates also start following this then there could be a huge market clash wherein the ads would lose its creativity. This is definitely not a smarter way but a shorter way to market ur product.

[majidrehman]

Hey...you have any articles on the these rules....would you mind sharing your source. Client of mine very keen to get to the bottom of this 'loophole' that unilever has found:)....guess she is tempted for her own industry....personally i agree with you....its quite tasteless

[yoursud]

(b) The subject matter of comparison is not chosen in such a way as to confer an artificial advantage upon the advertiser or so as to suggest that a better bargain is offered than is truly the case.

(c) The comparisons are factual, accurate and capable of substantiation.

(d) There is no likelihood of the consumer being misled as a result of the comparison, whether about the product advertised or that with which it is compared.

[majidrehman]

also... does the unilever ad meet the legal requirements???? to me its thin ice.....if they are getting away, and u know how....do share....thanks again.

[yoursud]

Following are the advertising rules.

Advertisements containing comparisons with other manufacturers or suppliers or with other products including those where a competitor is named, are permissible in the interests of vigorous competition and public enlightenment, provided:

(a) It is clear what aspects of the advertisers product are being compared with what aspects of the competitors product.

[satlipmd]

this ad has some inside job(i think)

[askathu]

Boycott Arrogant Unilever. Hope Unilever executives are reading these comments.

[boringneha]

how can be that straight forward..this add sucks

[bishwanaren]

Hey bharath, thanx dude... i was searching for this video...

And by the way for the dudes who comment this is an offense, just enjoy the ad.... Don't take it personally.

[azotae]

Plain arrogance or has HUL now officially lost it?

[parrypande]

we need to have some strict ad censorship or else it can harm our advertising qualities.. its tym to keep a check on ads.