Americans copy the british harrier and note that this has no missiles and cant i say cant carry them cos its shit all it has is a cannon you can do shit all with this plane
Australia has placed an order for 100 of these, And all our military experts are claiming its a waste of cash but the politicians have taken the decicion away from the military and is proceeding with the deal, no doubt they are protecting thier "kickbacks" from Lockheed. Its claimed we will lose air coverage with these inferior craft.
@slapyousilly3 I think that the emphasis was more on vertical landing and not take off. The fuel consumption for vertical take off would be huge I assume. It does say STOVL, meaning Standard Take Off Vertical Landing.
@drumbasher Short take off and vertical landing. Not standard. You saw the Engine was partly vectored down on take off, and the lift enhancing transformer looking parts were fully out! Thats not how a Standard Take of or carrier take off F35C or A would look.
SI vieron el ovni que aparece en la parte superior de izquierda a derecha en el 2:24 y desaparece si no desapareciera pensaría que es un avion wow XD....
3D or unmanned STV rejection fast-talk may cost some their program and job: E.g., the LAVI fighter. The 1st in aviation history flights of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV] with mini aero-control, stealth inlets/wing-body design took place in Israel in 1987 [May 18, 1987, Aviation Week]. Unclassified video in Facebook ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains sub/supersonic agility/safety gained by STV. EF, f35/f22 are not STV while unmanned NGB or ??? may be. Cf. X-44MANTA, X-47b, RQ-170, T-50, B-2.
@MrAytug Its not a UFO,n a second later you can see a black spot on the other side of the screen, What you are seeing is the chase plane filming it from the air. and circling around. The video jumps to that planes view a lot. 1:22 shows you a view from that plane.
I was so sad that Boeing didn't win. They made a better aircraft, but skunkwork's dependability paid off. Boeing's craft could come to a full stop, do a 180, and be back at Mac 1 in 20 seconds flat!!!
The Boeing X-32 has major design flaws. It suffers from the problem of hot air from the exhaust circulating back to the main engine, which causes the thrust to weaken and the engine to overheat. The original delta wing design had to be changed several times
to meet manoeuvrability and payload requirements. Even so it had less payload and shorter range then X-35.
Yeah, I remember on one documentary video where Boeing didn't have their design finalized until almost the last minute. They even had a "back up" model in case the first one didn't work.
You're right about the exhaust. On one of their vertical liftoff tests, the engine got clogged up in a few feet off the ground, choked and died! From what I remember, someone thought it was a good idea to take some parts off to make it lighter! Yeah, that test cost em points...
Not sure, probably the first time a jet plane ever landed from vertical flight like a harrier can take off. Amazing when you think about how difficult that is. One day, I would assume, most military jets will take off and land like this.
lol u think this ones ugly? u should of seen the one that boeing was going to make, see lockheed martin and boeing were competing to see who would get to build the jsf, each company made a prototype and lockeed won, i know all this cuz my dad actually worked on this plane.
nice video lmao (watchthink) "any kid in Afganistan will put it down with a rock" lmao yeah rite more like the jsf will blow the kid up before he blows it up
i thought it to, but this is just 1/2 of su37... i can see that americans jus show off but russians DO... i didnt se no american aircraft doing 720 degreez turns in one place... if ill see then it will be good aircraft
Gawd Dayyuumm =P There has to be like 305723852378905238 miles of wiring to get that thing moving...i mean, you gotta control the engines, controls, electronics, fan position, lifting fan, and a bunch of other stuff...that thing is gonna be a total punch to the US if it doesnt do well...
Are you retarded? Why in the hell would it be landing if there are enemy fighters around? Who are you and why are you trying to talk about something you clearly know nothing about? And there is no way that enemy anything gets close enough to this aircraft's base without being shot to hell by SAM and flak, not to mention scrambled interceptors. And it can afford to land slowly when it can land in places where no other airplane can even think about touching down.
The Harrior wasn't the first VTOL fighter, but the first practical one to go into production. The US had one in the '50's but cancelled the program, sat on it's tail and used a powerful turboprop. The Harrior was brilliant for it's time, the '60s, '70s, '80s, 90s, wow. The marine corp upgrade, the AV-8B+ really upped the odds with its F-18 radar and ability to carry the AMRAAM, it's 25mm gatling, etc. There was some research into a supersonic Harrier but would push up the cost too much.
there goes your welfare and health care, dudes. i'm sure you'll hate the jetplanes when it comes to be someone you know who couldn't pay for an uncovered but critical surgery.
Common fellers- If the US and the UK don't keep workin so dang hard at makin bigger and better machines fer killin useless anal orfices of the world, who in the god dang world will?
The aforementioned uao's, thats who. If you have the misfortune of being one, go hide. For the rest of us. God save the Queen, and Bless America, Right or wrong.
Ya, I know you hate me- and it worries sick. Ar Ar Ar
I get kind of hacked off at some of my fellow Brits adding comments along the lines of; "..the Harrier is better.." or; "..we did it first..", time marches on, and FYI, the UK is the number 1 Allied partner in this project, to the tune of £2 Billion and a lot of our expertise.
You're right, hundreds of thousands of innocent people would still be alive, including the Jews who had to suffer through the homosexual german leaders "cleansing" crap.
Amazing Tech, Yes bigboybri the harrier did do that 30 yrs ago. But the JSF is stealth, and could take on 4 harriers at one time, and destory all of them, and the other pilots would have never seen it comming.
Amazing Science.
It's a shame it's going to be used in America's future wars of Empire building. Billions will lose their lives.
lol. Billions. You know.. we're not the only ones fighting wars. Nevermind that the mid-east has been in constant chaos for hundreds... even thousands of years. Same for Africa and most of South America.
Innocent brown people my ass! You say that about the freakin hadjis when they set a bomb off right next to one of your buddies vehicle with no real goal and kill their own people for their freakin backwards religion that's all about killing. Nice bird though, looks like it might make a nice replacement for the AV-8 even though we'll probably get it in about 20 years like the V-22
Please Santa!
otiotori14 2 months ago
any one here cuz bf3
catchingsomezzzz 3 months ago 13
I'm not here for that, because of the jet in the game is a VTOL and this video is about a STOVL jet.
Ileko1 6 days ago
Americans copy the british harrier and note that this has no missiles and cant i say cant carry them cos its shit all it has is a cannon you can do shit all with this plane
Onlyonerofl 3 months ago
Wao! este es el F32? Que Maquina!
pacduarte 4 months ago
Australia has placed an order for 100 of these, And all our military experts are claiming its a waste of cash but the politicians have taken the decicion away from the military and is proceeding with the deal, no doubt they are protecting thier "kickbacks" from Lockheed. Its claimed we will lose air coverage with these inferior craft.
qotsaandsoadfan1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it's been ten years since this flight and this plane is still in its development. deym!
TolitsDterrible 5 months ago
maintenance cost for that will be a joke its got more moving parts than a transformer
kbjjustin558 6 months ago 7
congratulation USA, you are successfully put a dick in one of your plane
namasayagiri 6 months ago
this didn't have a good view of Walmart
brown9708 10 months ago
i thought it takes less time for that thing to land
funthing1991 10 months ago
@slapyousilly3 I think that the emphasis was more on vertical landing and not take off. The fuel consumption for vertical take off would be huge I assume. It does say STOVL, meaning Standard Take Off Vertical Landing.
drumbasher 10 months ago
@drumbasher Short take off and vertical landing. Not standard. You saw the Engine was partly vectored down on take off, and the lift enhancing transformer looking parts were fully out! Thats not how a Standard Take of or carrier take off F35C or A would look.
newmanfrigan 10 months ago
@skeatesy1 Don't you have some kids over on the Justing Beiber videos to troll?
drumbasher 10 months ago
well , after playing Battlefield 2 i didnt belive Jets can fly so slow and that F35 can fligh vertical... now i belive :D
thnx for the awesome video
Timeline15 1 year ago
i bet these young pups could never fly a harrier
xxkil 1 year ago
@xxkil A lot of them are actually old harrier pilots mate
shadowblade145 1 year ago
SI vieron el ovni que aparece en la parte superior de izquierda a derecha en el 2:24 y desaparece si no desapareciera pensaría que es un avion wow XD....
joshuaraziel 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3D or unmanned STV rejection fast-talk may cost some their program and job: E.g., the LAVI fighter. The 1st in aviation history flights of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV] with mini aero-control, stealth inlets/wing-body design took place in Israel in 1987 [May 18, 1987, Aviation Week]. Unclassified video in Facebook ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains sub/supersonic agility/safety gained by STV. EF, f35/f22 are not STV while unmanned NGB or ??? may be. Cf. X-44MANTA, X-47b, RQ-170, T-50, B-2.
1Bengalor 1 year ago
That is no UFO (@2.24). Most probably the chase plane. you can see it @ 2.28
chetankathalay 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chetankathalay
its a weather balloon.... ¬_¬"
V10H4Z4RD 1 year ago
Awesome plane, but I reckon the pilot would have to be careful that he doesn't land in places he can't take off from...
AV3NG3R00 1 year ago
@AV3NG3R00 no, its also capable of a straightforward vertical takeoff, but a short runway is more practical.
thebrainiac1 1 year ago
anyone seen UFO at 2:24
MrAytug 2 years ago
Comment removed
MIZUEZ 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrAytug Its not a UFO,n a second later you can see a black spot on the other side of the screen, What you are seeing is the chase plane filming it from the air. and circling around. The video jumps to that planes view a lot. 1:22 shows you a view from that plane.
MIZUEZ 1 year ago
@MrAytug That's the other camera. Look at some of the scenes. There are quite a lot of areal footage :)
RyanTheTuber 1 year ago
im gonna sart trainign to fly planes like this and the F-22 raptor:D
Th3Real5capps 2 years ago
I saw another vid where it landed quicker....maybe they were just testing the power settings or something.
jaredholmes46 2 years ago
WOW cool plane but it takes along time to land
d3adinside1234 2 years ago
I was so sad that Boeing didn't win. They made a better aircraft, but skunkwork's dependability paid off. Boeing's craft could come to a full stop, do a 180, and be back at Mac 1 in 20 seconds flat!!!
joebrueske 3 years ago
The Boeing X-32 has major design flaws. It suffers from the problem of hot air from the exhaust circulating back to the main engine, which causes the thrust to weaken and the engine to overheat. The original delta wing design had to be changed several times
to meet manoeuvrability and payload requirements. Even so it had less payload and shorter range then X-35.
riskinhos 2 years ago
Yeah, I remember on one documentary video where Boeing didn't have their design finalized until almost the last minute. They even had a "back up" model in case the first one didn't work.
You're right about the exhaust. On one of their vertical liftoff tests, the engine got clogged up in a few feet off the ground, choked and died! From what I remember, someone thought it was a good idea to take some parts off to make it lighter! Yeah, that test cost em points...
joebrueske 2 years ago
The removal of parts was because the X-32 couldn't go from STOVL to supersonic without being physically altered on the ground.
Alias1107 2 years ago
I love the JSF. I can see it almost everyday when its being tested. I live really close to Plant 42.
tabithahtibat 3 years ago 2
This is my Favorite, the F-35 STOVL xD
Apfel318 4 years ago
pretty much...need some ufos...
UFOMAN618 4 years ago
Such a long landing? some one could repeatedley throw stones at it in that time and knock it out.
Didn't they learn anything from the British Harrier? :)
impee 4 years ago
Not sure, probably the first time a jet plane ever landed from vertical flight like a harrier can take off. Amazing when you think about how difficult that is. One day, I would assume, most military jets will take off and land like this.
DarkerDivinity 4 years ago
it doesnt have to be pretty, it just has to work
subliminalshadow 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ugly aircraft
B787YV 4 years ago
lol u think this ones ugly? u should of seen the one that boeing was going to make, see lockheed martin and boeing were competing to see who would get to build the jsf, each company made a prototype and lockeed won, i know all this cuz my dad actually worked on this plane.
ChevyNova572 3 years ago
Yes im sure a kid can throw fast enough and with enough projectory to hit the F-35 with a rock.
The F-35 wouldnt even notice the kid. Unless a rocket came from the area. In which the Kid would probably be hit by several 1000lb bombs.
EconomicMeltdown 4 years ago
Damn, mind the fuel costs? ^^
Fishnudel 4 years ago
is the trailer on youtube???
MoNziL 5 years ago
nice video lmao (watchthink) "any kid in Afganistan will put it down with a rock" lmao yeah rite more like the jsf will blow the kid up before he blows it up
mikestir777 5 years ago
i call this plane always flying shark, such an amazing airplane, wonderfull. tnx for sharing this nice stuff!
nebu147 5 years ago
When do we get to see the first crash videos?
kyanakwe 5 years ago
i thought it to, but this is just 1/2 of su37... i can see that americans jus show off but russians DO... i didnt se no american aircraft doing 720 degreez turns in one place... if ill see then it will be good aircraft
FruityLoopsas 5 years ago
rentre tes pates le beigne
thebenny1985 5 years ago
ohh yeaa
AARONEGGLI 5 years ago
Incredible. Legendary aircraft!
EricKZhang 5 years ago
parece que o caça tem um anus que solta pum!
rapixan4 5 years ago
That is neither here nor there, you got the point.
XA2I3RX 5 years ago
nice aircraft
M24E9L 5 years ago
Gawd Dayyuumm =P There has to be like 305723852378905238 miles of wiring to get that thing moving...i mean, you gotta control the engines, controls, electronics, fan position, lifting fan, and a bunch of other stuff...that thing is gonna be a total punch to the US if it doesnt do well...
Ice0Man01575 5 years ago
Are you retarded? Why in the hell would it be landing if there are enemy fighters around? Who are you and why are you trying to talk about something you clearly know nothing about? And there is no way that enemy anything gets close enough to this aircraft's base without being shot to hell by SAM and flak, not to mention scrambled interceptors. And it can afford to land slowly when it can land in places where no other airplane can even think about touching down.
Rpblcn190 5 years ago 2
while it's doing this, it gets missile by other fighter from above. this bullshit is landing is too slow.
octanetank 5 years ago
OOOOOooooo so the f-35 can't take off vertically?
Dascoo 5 years ago
yeah amazing these machines of war ey...
BarbarBoobie 5 years ago
the harrier still looks better than the jsf i think
harrier is a more attractive aircraft in my opinion
jon0d 5 years ago
The Harrior wasn't the first VTOL fighter, but the first practical one to go into production. The US had one in the '50's but cancelled the program, sat on it's tail and used a powerful turboprop. The Harrior was brilliant for it's time, the '60s, '70s, '80s, 90s, wow. The marine corp upgrade, the AV-8B+ really upped the odds with its F-18 radar and ability to carry the AMRAAM, it's 25mm gatling, etc. There was some research into a supersonic Harrier but would push up the cost too much.
EnigmaNZ 5 years ago
How many of you guys are pilots? How many of you guys actually worked on these planes? Why does everyone have to act like they know more?
viruslived 5 years ago
Norway also plays a big part in this project, don't forget that..!
pwnerfmn 5 years ago
there goes your welfare and health care, dudes. i'm sure you'll hate the jetplanes when it comes to be someone you know who couldn't pay for an uncovered but critical surgery.
vjaypan 5 years ago
Common fellers- If the US and the UK don't keep workin so dang hard at makin bigger and better machines fer killin useless anal orfices of the world, who in the god dang world will?
The aforementioned uao's, thats who. If you have the misfortune of being one, go hide. For the rest of us. God save the Queen, and Bless America, Right or wrong.
Ya, I know you hate me- and it worries sick. Ar Ar Ar
ranchoroncho 5 years ago
I get kind of hacked off at some of my fellow Brits adding comments along the lines of; "..the Harrier is better.." or; "..we did it first..", time marches on, and FYI, the UK is the number 1 Allied partner in this project, to the tune of £2 Billion and a lot of our expertise.
Toolpusher 5 years ago
We appreciate people like you man, you realize and understand that we need eachother to be successful and survive!
XA2I3RX 5 years ago
My fiancee worked on the engine system.
electrogeek77 5 years ago
i cant see the string there
haydee23 5 years ago
My neighbor is the guy who runs the whole f35 program here in fort worth. Its pretty amazing.
Nick1814 5 years ago
if it wasn't for the Air Force, most of you would be speaking German or Russian.
SWSimpson 5 years ago
Yea... and hundreds of thousands of innocent people would still be ALIVE. oops does that mean i hate freedom now?
yermanoffthetelly 5 years ago
You're right, hundreds of thousands of innocent people would still be alive, including the Jews who had to suffer through the homosexual german leaders "cleansing" crap.
XA2I3RX 5 years ago
Amazing Tech, Yes bigboybri the harrier did do that 30 yrs ago. But the JSF is stealth, and could take on 4 harriers at one time, and destory all of them, and the other pilots would have never seen it comming.
Amazing Science.
It's a shame it's going to be used in America's future wars of Empire building. Billions will lose their lives.
TDanza8 5 years ago
lol. Billions. You know.. we're not the only ones fighting wars. Nevermind that the mid-east has been in constant chaos for hundreds... even thousands of years. Same for Africa and most of South America.
djAnakin 5 years ago
haha way behind time, americans always think they brought something new out!!! our harrier junkjet did that over 30 years ago....
bigboybri 5 years ago
Who said we said STOVL was new!?
1. It's jumpjet. Not junkjet. Dumbass.
2. Britian is our #1 partner in the JSF program.
3. The harrier is old. It's structurally old, it's technology is old. It's extremely visable on radar.
4. JSF is stealth.
5. JSF can take out multiple targets, including your junkjet, without even trying.
6. JSF will eventually replace your precious junkjet.
djAnakin 5 years ago
Innocent brown people my ass! You say that about the freakin hadjis when they set a bomb off right next to one of your buddies vehicle with no real goal and kill their own people for their freakin backwards religion that's all about killing. Nice bird though, looks like it might make a nice replacement for the AV-8 even though we'll probably get it in about 20 years like the V-22
BigBananaMan 5 years ago
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEN7LidCuAU === whatch the tv
terdhearder 5 years ago
thats very technologically advanced
zaftpilot 6 years ago
the science in amazing.
the waste of energy is a shame.
RobCardIV 6 years ago
Awesome video! It almost looks alive the way the nozzle moves around and all the flaps open and shut. :)
VisceralLogic 6 years ago
Yeah thats why we spend billions of dollars on developing state of the art fighters. To drop bombs on innocent people.
mitchsn 6 years ago
cool, thanks for posting this.
vpecc118 6 years ago
A BEEEEAUTIFUL THING!
rcaskater2 6 years ago