Actually, Subach ,what I meant was that 'Life' should not be created by artificial means (But hey,each person is entitled to their opinion,wouldn't you agree?)
Subach, I really agree that your speeches are really good.I believe that life should only be created by God, and that Human beings should not clonned.Only God has the power to give life, and he is the only one that can take it away.
Well in that case, be sure you never have sex, wouldn't want to have the power to give life and defy god. You might accidentally make some clones that way too. Thousands of these "twins" walking around spiting god with their very existance.
I tire of the 'philosophical' debate regarding genetic engineering. In particular the notion that this is anything to do with the atheism/theism debate or that either group has anything to say on the matter out of their own convictions that has any relevance. Genetic engineering has advantages but also has potential risks. Any debate should proceed from the viewpoint of balancing the benefits against the risks. I do not see that X-atheist or X-theist has any case to commentate on this subject.
"But there's nothing irrational about a circle" said the Philosopher to the mathematician.
I agree, but convincing them of that is another story. In lieu of such I'll attempt to convince philosopher of philosophical consistency of the circle that he may accept the usage of Pi without bothering the mathematician. Though I admit the risk of legitimatizing their trespass I believe it is necessary until such a time when they can be convinced of the irrationality of such moral trespasses.
I refer the "environmentalists" you mention as the fake environmentalists. I'm actually an environmentalist, I'm just one that realizes that technology is the solution to most of our environmental problems.
You realize what you believe has nothing to do with the anti-human ideology which calls itself the "green movement", or environmentalism. I don't think anyone likes dirty water or animal torture. But those are for humans, not for animals.
With all the billionaires in the world I can't imagine that humans are NOT being cloned.
emilnomel2009 1 year ago
Actually, Subach ,what I meant was that 'Life' should not be created by artificial means (But hey,each person is entitled to their opinion,wouldn't you agree?)
mmmnbvcxz16 3 years ago
Subach, I really agree that your speeches are really good.I believe that life should only be created by God, and that Human beings should not clonned.Only God has the power to give life, and he is the only one that can take it away.
mmmnbvcxz16 3 years ago
Well in that case, be sure you never have sex, wouldn't want to have the power to give life and defy god. You might accidentally make some clones that way too. Thousands of these "twins" walking around spiting god with their very existance.
subach 3 years ago
Good point about it being an arbitrary line.
BWF89 3 years ago
In other words, write off this 'debate' to the same territory as whether rocks should be fashioned into bridges. A non-debate, as you say.
ChrisJMoor 3 years ago
I tire of the 'philosophical' debate regarding genetic engineering. In particular the notion that this is anything to do with the atheism/theism debate or that either group has anything to say on the matter out of their own convictions that has any relevance. Genetic engineering has advantages but also has potential risks. Any debate should proceed from the viewpoint of balancing the benefits against the risks. I do not see that X-atheist or X-theist has any case to commentate on this subject.
ChrisJMoor 3 years ago
"But there's nothing irrational about a circle" said the Philosopher to the mathematician.
I agree, but convincing them of that is another story. In lieu of such I'll attempt to convince philosopher of philosophical consistency of the circle that he may accept the usage of Pi without bothering the mathematician. Though I admit the risk of legitimatizing their trespass I believe it is necessary until such a time when they can be convinced of the irrationality of such moral trespasses.
subach 3 years ago
We should really get into it and just attack this environmentalist bullshit. Sky Scraper is so much better than a rain forest.
AnarchyIsForMe 3 years ago
I refer the "environmentalists" you mention as the fake environmentalists. I'm actually an environmentalist, I'm just one that realizes that technology is the solution to most of our environmental problems.
subach 3 years ago
You realize what you believe has nothing to do with the anti-human ideology which calls itself the "green movement", or environmentalism. I don't think anyone likes dirty water or animal torture. But those are for humans, not for animals.
AnarchyIsForMe 3 years ago