The FX will show its tailights to every other SUV made and alot of sports cars and sedans. The reason it is quicker than others with more hp like the Range and almost as quick as the others that out run it with substantially more hp is because the FX weighs 4700lbs. Much less than its european competition and it is also better geared than several with a 7 speed transmission. The Merc has a 7 speed also and the New Cayenne Turbo has a 8 speed auto.
The FX50s is one of the fastest SUV's made period. The only SUV's that can out run it are the BMW X5/X6 M models both with the twin turbo V8 making 555hp. The newly revised and much lighter than the previous generation Porsche Cayenne Turbo with 500hp. The ML63 AMG Merc with a 6.2L V8 all motor making 503hp and the old and new generation Jeep Cherokee SRT8 420 - 470hp. They all run 0-60 in under 5 secs, the FX has done 5 flat. The new Range Rover Sport SC is a tic behind with 510 hp.
The m6 is about .8 seconds faster 0-60 but if the driver of the m6 can't drive, the fx50 has a fighting chance until the power-to-weight ratio kicks in and the m6 pulls ahead. I've pulled on an m3 in my FX50 becaus they couldn't drive well.
@bayarm9 impossible, it must have been an fx35. The range rover supercharged's 0-60 is like 7.3 seconds, 2 seconds slower than the FX50's average 5.3 0-60. even the Range Rover sport S/C still has about a 5.9 0-60. I have run my FX50 at a 5.0 flat 0-60. Sorry bud
The FX50 has a faster average 0-60 and 1/4 mile than the range rover supercharged. Plus, the Range Rover supercharged has 120 more horsepower than the FX. In certain situations, the Range rover would pull on the FX because of the power difference and supercharger. If the FX50 has a supercharger slapped on it it would be running up in the 500-550 hp range too. Plus, what does this have to do with an x6? the x6 and range sc both have more horsepower/torque than the FX50, it shows after 60mph.
@ivyspikes16 and i also know for the price of an X5 M (+$26,000) i can put a twin-turbo kit in a FX50 which will then leave the X5 M wayyyyyyy behind! lol
@guzena I like japanese cars too, but your story... X5 4.8 can be never beaten by foresteк 2.5T, sorry. X5 4.8 accelerates 0-100 in about 5.8-6 sec. And what about FX50S, I certainly know thant X6m easily beats it. But of I think that FX50S is the best crossover however:)
@guzena I like japanese cars too, but your story... X5 4.8 can be never beaten by foresteк 2.5T, sorry. X5 4.8 accelerates 0-100 in about 5.8-6 sec. And what about FX50S, I certainly know thant X6m easily beats it. But of I think that FX50S is the best crossover however:)
Finaly, someone else who see's the slow response on BMW's.
My mom owns a M6 conv. and I hate driving it myself. Theres about a 1 second delay after you step on the pedal before the car realizes wtf is going on.
But the m6 driver failed. Should have used the launch control with the DSC off and the EDC set to 2nd.
Either way, AWD should rape RWD at launches anyways.
The FX will show its tailights to every other SUV made and alot of sports cars and sedans. The reason it is quicker than others with more hp like the Range and almost as quick as the others that out run it with substantially more hp is because the FX weighs 4700lbs. Much less than its european competition and it is also better geared than several with a 7 speed transmission. The Merc has a 7 speed also and the New Cayenne Turbo has a 8 speed auto.
wesworr81 3 weeks ago
The FX50s is one of the fastest SUV's made period. The only SUV's that can out run it are the BMW X5/X6 M models both with the twin turbo V8 making 555hp. The newly revised and much lighter than the previous generation Porsche Cayenne Turbo with 500hp. The ML63 AMG Merc with a 6.2L V8 all motor making 503hp and the old and new generation Jeep Cherokee SRT8 420 - 470hp. They all run 0-60 in under 5 secs, the FX has done 5 flat. The new Range Rover Sport SC is a tic behind with 510 hp.
wesworr81 3 weeks ago
@wesworr81 yes but after 60mph the FX is destroyed by them all.
jebaker1121 3 weeks ago
PEACE OF SHIT BMW :))
stranac1 4 months ago
The m6 is about .8 seconds faster 0-60 but if the driver of the m6 can't drive, the fx50 has a fighting chance until the power-to-weight ratio kicks in and the m6 pulls ahead. I've pulled on an m3 in my FX50 becaus they couldn't drive well.
jebaker1121 5 months ago
i raced a fx50 with my range rover supercharged it smoked the FX50!
bayarm9 8 months ago
@bayarm9 impossible, it must have been an fx35. The range rover supercharged's 0-60 is like 7.3 seconds, 2 seconds slower than the FX50's average 5.3 0-60. even the Range Rover sport S/C still has about a 5.9 0-60. I have run my FX50 at a 5.0 flat 0-60. Sorry bud
jebaker1121 5 months ago
@jebaker1121 its the 2010 Range rover iam not saying the FX is bad but it was beaten. search up range rover vs fx vs x6.
bayarm9 5 months ago
The FX50 has a faster average 0-60 and 1/4 mile than the range rover supercharged. Plus, the Range Rover supercharged has 120 more horsepower than the FX. In certain situations, the Range rover would pull on the FX because of the power difference and supercharger. If the FX50 has a supercharger slapped on it it would be running up in the 500-550 hp range too. Plus, what does this have to do with an x6? the x6 and range sc both have more horsepower/torque than the FX50, it shows after 60mph.
jebaker1121 5 months ago
@jebaker1121 Iam just saying. anyway they are both good cars.
bayarm9 5 months ago
и чО?
vadimOmega 9 months ago
guy are you retard wake up lol m6 vs fx50 and you tthink fx50 win haha funny guys
sniperman125 10 months ago
So, where's the finish?
stulax18 10 months ago
m6 driver is drunk!!
wo496 1 year ago
INFINITI IST THE BEST CAR OR WORLD
URRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
DERMONTIN007 1 year ago
race the X6 5.0 that thing would hand you your ass from
shaybutta11208 1 year ago
Dont matter who's faster, the infinitis are better looking.
unchboy 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
infinity started way first
we raced our x5 4.4 with the fx50 once
wow really it was about dead even but our x5 got bit to the front
johnnyzinho0 2 years ago
What???
X5 4,4 is faster than fx50??? you`re crazy man!
I can bet 1 000 000$ that fx50 would smoke X5 (especially 4,4) within min 2 car bodys!!!
I`ve smoked 4,8 X5 on my Forester 2,5 turbo, 4,4 was not a problem for me at all...but i didn`t was even close in race with FX50...you`re bullshiter!
guzena 2 years ago 9
try the X5 M vs FX50....haha not a race
chivasrocks 2 years ago
try X5 M vs. Lamborgini Gellardo.... haha not a race (equally stupid comment though)
bart12121314 2 years ago
@guzena he meant the X5 M... it has 555 HP look it up... not the regular one die..and yes the X5 M would leave it wayyyyyy behind...
ivyspikes16 1 year ago
@ivyspikes16 and i also know for the price of an X5 M (+$26,000) i can put a twin-turbo kit in a FX50 which will then leave the X5 M wayyyyyyy behind! lol
ricksmiths10 1 year ago
look up a video with the 4.8 or the x6 5.0, infinity gets owned even though its the best car of its model
fuck you little infinity fan, I go for the real winner not for the car i like.
johnnyzinho0 1 year ago
@guzena I like japanese cars too, but your story... X5 4.8 can be never beaten by foresteк 2.5T, sorry. X5 4.8 accelerates 0-100 in about 5.8-6 sec. And what about FX50S, I certainly know thant X6m easily beats it. But of I think that FX50S is the best crossover however:)
Whisper427509 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@guzena I like japanese cars too, but your story... X5 4.8 can be never beaten by foresteк 2.5T, sorry. X5 4.8 accelerates 0-100 in about 5.8-6 sec. And what about FX50S, I certainly know thant X6m easily beats it. But of I think that FX50S is the best crossover however:)
Whisper427509 1 year ago
Noo it didnt..
Infiniti has a quicker throttle response, BMW had to think about what the hell was going on before it did anything.
jamesysam002 2 years ago
@jamesysam002
Finaly, someone else who see's the slow response on BMW's.
My mom owns a M6 conv. and I hate driving it myself. Theres about a 1 second delay after you step on the pedal before the car realizes wtf is going on.
But the m6 driver failed. Should have used the launch control with the DSC off and the EDC set to 2nd.
Either way, AWD should rape RWD at launches anyways.
rcmankamil 1 year ago
@rcmankamil ive had the same frking problem with my x6 v8, everytime i wanna step on it i get tht fucking delay, and its rlly pissing off
hamoody600 8 months ago
Why is this posted?
torxMonster 2 years ago 22
spetznaz
1nathanstone 2 years ago
ссыкливый:)
zMINIMAl 2 years ago
goood
kubino1212 2 years ago