Added: 2 years ago
From: guzena
Views: 96,227
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The FX will show its tailights to every other SUV made and alot of sports cars and sedans. The reason it is quicker than others with more hp like the Range and almost as quick as the others that out run it with substantially more hp is because the FX weighs 4700lbs. Much less than its european competition and it is also better geared than several with a 7 speed transmission. The Merc has a 7 speed also and the New Cayenne Turbo has a 8 speed auto.

  • The FX50s is one of the fastest SUV's made period. The only SUV's that can out run it are the BMW X5/X6 M models both with the twin turbo V8 making 555hp. The newly revised and much lighter than the previous generation Porsche Cayenne Turbo with 500hp. The ML63 AMG Merc with a 6.2L V8 all motor making 503hp and the old and new generation Jeep Cherokee SRT8 420 - 470hp. They all run 0-60 in under 5 secs, the FX has done 5 flat. The new Range Rover Sport SC is a tic behind with 510 hp.

  • @wesworr81 yes but after 60mph the FX is destroyed by them all.

  • PEACE OF SHIT BMW :))

  • The m6 is about .8 seconds faster 0-60 but if the driver of the m6 can't drive, the fx50 has a fighting chance until the power-to-weight ratio kicks in and the m6 pulls ahead. I've pulled on an m3 in my FX50 becaus they couldn't drive well.

  • i raced a fx50 with my range rover supercharged it smoked the FX50!

  • @bayarm9 impossible, it must have been an fx35. The range rover supercharged's 0-60 is like 7.3 seconds, 2 seconds slower than the FX50's average 5.3 0-60. even the Range Rover sport S/C still has about a 5.9 0-60. I have run my FX50 at a 5.0 flat 0-60. Sorry bud

  • @jebaker1121 its the 2010 Range rover iam not saying the FX is bad but it was beaten. search up range rover vs fx vs x6.

  • The FX50 has a faster average 0-60 and 1/4 mile than the range rover supercharged. Plus, the Range Rover supercharged has 120 more horsepower than the FX. In certain situations, the Range rover would pull on the FX because of the power difference and supercharger. If the FX50 has a supercharger slapped on it it would be running up in the 500-550 hp range too. Plus, what does this have to do with an x6? the x6 and range sc both have more horsepower/torque than the FX50, it shows after 60mph.

  • @jebaker1121 Iam just saying. anyway they are both good cars.

  • и чО?

  • guy are you retard wake up lol m6 vs fx50 and you tthink fx50 win haha funny guys

  • So, where's the finish?

  • m6 driver is drunk!!

  • INFINITI IST THE BEST CAR OR WORLD

    URRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAA­AAAAAAA

  • race the X6 5.0 that thing would hand you your ass from

  • Dont matter who's faster, the infinitis are better looking.

  • What???

    X5 4,4 is faster than fx50??? you`re crazy man!

    I can bet 1 000 000$ that fx50 would smoke X5 (especially 4,4) within min 2 car bodys!!!

    I`ve smoked 4,8 X5 on my Forester 2,5 turbo, 4,4 was not a problem for me at all...but i didn`t was even close in race with FX50...you`re bullshiter!

  • try the X5 M vs FX50....haha not a race

  • try X5 M vs. Lamborgini Gellardo.... haha not a race (equally stupid comment though)

  • @guzena he meant the X5 M... it has 555 HP look it up... not the regular one die..and yes the X5 M would leave it wayyyyyy behind...

  • @ivyspikes16 and i also know for the price of an X5 M (+$26,000) i can put a twin-turbo kit in a FX50 which will then leave the X5 M wayyyyyyy behind! lol

  • look up a video with the 4.8 or the x6 5.0, infinity gets owned even though its the best car of its model

    fuck you little infinity fan, I go for the real winner not for the car i like.

  • @guzena I like japanese cars too, but your story... X5 4.8 can be never beaten by foresteк 2.5T, sorry. X5 4.8 accelerates 0-100 in about 5.8-6 sec. And what about FX50S, I certainly know thant X6m easily beats it. But of I think that FX50S is the best crossover however:)

  • Noo it didnt..

    Infiniti has a quicker throttle response, BMW had to think about what the hell was going on before it did anything.

  • @jamesysam002

    Finaly, someone else who see's the slow response on BMW's.

    My mom owns a M6 conv. and I hate driving it myself. Theres about a 1 second delay after you step on the pedal before the car realizes wtf is going on.

    But the m6 driver failed. Should have used the launch control with the DSC off and the EDC set to 2nd.

    Either way, AWD should rape RWD at launches anyways.

  • @rcmankamil ive had the same frking problem with my x6 v8, everytime i wanna step on it i get tht fucking delay, and its rlly pissing off

  • Why is this posted?

  • spetznaz

  • ссыкливый:)

  • goood

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more