ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE ( In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil) ~ Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology).
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works doesn't mean there's no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell then the apparatus exists to direct the formation of more cells, but how did that first cell originate? Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not arrange or produce. If a variation survives that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION COULDN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
Hahaha fish not only can walk but they can fly too hahaha... Kill the religious people. They have been mistaken to the point they have become a threat to the human race. I enjoy burning churches to the ground. Wake up and fuck them all worldwide. Evolution Now!!!
Goto (Google It) GoodScienceForYou Neutral Evolution Forum and learn how to learn, without beliefs forced on you. Also listen to some good Blues from my band HavenHead.
The only way to not be at the bottom of the food chain was to either be fast, have rough skin, be spikey, get big or get out the way. I guess these fellas decided to get out the way.
why wont it evolve? if it can Fly Away And evade it's Preditor thats hunting it. it can't evolve. evolution only acures when it really needed. exaple when a creature is beeing eaten and having a hard time Geting away. then it's offpring will have somthing more easy to use and easier to excape from that preditor. and thats how Creatures evolve in natures own path.
That's not quite how it works. Evolution doesn't occur because it is "needed". Rather, a creature that possesses the right features for a given environment is more likely to reproduce. If an animal "has a hard time getting away", it's far less likely to even *have* offspring. Over time, the environment and mutations select for the population that can survive in that environment.
well, no- that's no quite how it works- What actually happens is there is always a degree of genetic variation in all things. It is these differences that drive evolution. Say there are 100 fish and 10 of them are faster than the rest- the rest all get eaten, whereas the fast ones can escape and breed. And, they will have fast kids- who can survive- it's simplified here, but that's thats the method.
This is actualy a real species of fish called Exocoetidae, they are fish and havenothing to do with birds but the wings are like bug wings and when they are about to be eaten or attacked by another predetor they have the ability to hover above the water for a short period of time, the only reason why this clip is so amazing is due to the time it spent out of the water, that is one special fish!
You have people who can run faster then other people? So can that be same with fish? Untill i see him like flying around my city and crapping on people then he is a bird
Oh yes, true science, such as the world is flat, the sun revolves around Earth, talking snakes, etc. Yep, God did give us true science. Fuck people like Newton and Darwin, they're just no good liars.
Why? If a flying fish can fly far enough to evade its predators now with a ten or twenty second flight why would it evolve the capacity to fly for five minutes? Evolution only occurs if there is a direct benefit for every step of the way. The selection pressure to evolve a few minutes worth of flight is not there so they will never get the opportunity to evolve the ability to fly for hours unless sexual selection kicks in to help them over that hump.
It would be interesting if ocean birds swooped at those flying fish and tried to eat them. It may speed the evolution of their flying capabilities up by killing the ones that are not as good at flying as their rivals are; thus genes for improved flying capabilities (agility, speed etc) spread through the population.
Not denying the validity of the fact of evolution, but some idiots here are making it sound like the fish is an one-off freak of nature that just "morphed" yesterday.
Flying fish are so common in the tropical seas most seasoned mariners won't even give them a second look.
We need scientific knowledge to support the theory of evolution, not political fervor. Those ignorant fools are only weakening it.
What you don't believe in burning talking bushes? I'll believe God was created in the image of an invisible God before I believe in observable evidence. Who really needs Science?
Well, if you do not need science (which is evidence based reasoning), stop typing on that computer of yours. Don't take antibiotics when you are sick. Don't drive a car. Don't look through a telescope. Just strip naked and run off into the jungle.
flying fish is not a new kind of fish --'
luvyouOonot11 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE ( In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil) ~ Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works doesn't mean there's no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell then the apparatus exists to direct the formation of more cells, but how did that first cell originate? Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not arrange or produce. If a variation survives that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION COULDN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
Mogley52 4 months ago
they glide they don't fly
megadarkassassinn 6 months ago
IT'S A BIRD! IT'S A PLANE! no it's actually a fish...
themousemaster 8 months ago
is that even a fish???
keke121998 9 months ago
SUPAAA FISHH! :D -3
tokiohotelismyworld 11 months ago
Hahaha fish not only can walk but they can fly too hahaha... Kill the religious people. They have been mistaken to the point they have become a threat to the human race. I enjoy burning churches to the ground. Wake up and fuck them all worldwide. Evolution Now!!!
NaoSouNando2006Nao 11 months ago
its a flying fish, so ?
wild0hawk 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Goto (Google It) GoodScienceForYou Neutral Evolution Forum and learn how to learn, without beliefs forced on you. Also listen to some good Blues from my band HavenHead.
GoodScienceForYou 11 months ago
Really impressive!
wollin20 1 year ago
we should interchange genes with the other fish thats able to walk on earth with this fish's flying ability
amgt333 1 year ago
How retarded are you that you have never heard of flying fish?
themarxmarvelous 1 year ago
The only way to not be at the bottom of the food chain was to either be fast, have rough skin, be spikey, get big or get out the way. I guess these fellas decided to get out the way.
sean1ers 1 year ago
Every time I scroll down to comments a part of me dies
H3llkn0wz 1 year ago 4
are you a little bit dumb? why should it be a gene drift or mutation?
it's a normal fish - a flying fish.
humans also eat nuts and we're no rodents ^^
and humans can dive and we're no fish ^^
McLovinBt 1 year ago
@McLovinBt next thing you kno ppl r gonna be like "PLATYPUS? WTF IS THIS THING! OHhh MUTATION, NATURAL SELECTION WOaaHAH"
Korosiv 1 year ago
mutation natural selection gene drift
patrickledford420 1 year ago
why shouldn't fish be allowed to fly? i'm sure they've earned it
WhiskersMctabby 2 years ago
dude this fish has always been there they r just not that commonly seen
ayshey 2 years ago
this is not ur video
SaintsRowMaster12345 2 years ago
why wont it evolve? if it can Fly Away And evade it's Preditor thats hunting it. it can't evolve. evolution only acures when it really needed. exaple when a creature is beeing eaten and having a hard time Geting away. then it's offpring will have somthing more easy to use and easier to excape from that preditor. and thats how Creatures evolve in natures own path.
macker993 2 years ago
That's not quite how it works. Evolution doesn't occur because it is "needed". Rather, a creature that possesses the right features for a given environment is more likely to reproduce. If an animal "has a hard time getting away", it's far less likely to even *have* offspring. Over time, the environment and mutations select for the population that can survive in that environment.
drumrnva 2 years ago 2
well, no- that's no quite how it works- What actually happens is there is always a degree of genetic variation in all things. It is these differences that drive evolution. Say there are 100 fish and 10 of them are faster than the rest- the rest all get eaten, whereas the fast ones can escape and breed. And, they will have fast kids- who can survive- it's simplified here, but that's thats the method.
nathd86m 2 years ago
No evolution does not occur when needed, evolution is random
donnomar 2 years ago
I correct my self, mutation is random, evolution is guided by natural selections
donnomar 2 years ago 2
Evulution only accures when needed But! It is random selected into whom are most affected.
macker993 2 years ago
@macker993 well thats not a very good description of evolution.
TheRickylove83 1 year ago
This is actualy a real species of fish called Exocoetidae, they are fish and havenothing to do with birds but the wings are like bug wings and when they are about to be eaten or attacked by another predetor they have the ability to hover above the water for a short period of time, the only reason why this clip is so amazing is due to the time it spent out of the water, that is one special fish!
TheSocioTownUploader 2 years ago
You have people who can run faster then other people? So can that be same with fish? Untill i see him like flying around my city and crapping on people then he is a bird
akaboy4life 2 years ago
SIMPLY AMAZING!
WunderDoob 2 years ago
I caught one on film accidently for about 5 seconds
llamzrt 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Science belonged to God; if it was not for God, true science wouldn't exist.
heyjuju 2 years ago
Oh yes, true science, such as the world is flat, the sun revolves around Earth, talking snakes, etc. Yep, God did give us true science. Fuck people like Newton and Darwin, they're just no good liars.
kmartmask 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
julianbarry 2 years ago
Flying fish will fly higher one day and become a brand new species through the process of selective evolution........
1UTUBES1 2 years ago 4
Why? If a flying fish can fly far enough to evade its predators now with a ten or twenty second flight why would it evolve the capacity to fly for five minutes? Evolution only occurs if there is a direct benefit for every step of the way. The selection pressure to evolve a few minutes worth of flight is not there so they will never get the opportunity to evolve the ability to fly for hours unless sexual selection kicks in to help them over that hump.
MartinJWillett 2 years ago
youtube / venomfangx
youtube / truthmakesfree
bluliite 2 years ago
fuck face ur retarted its called a flying fish oooh its an alien retard
miger2 2 years ago
its called a flying fish and that's the name its nothing NEW or Mutated,its been on earth for millions of years.
xXKentoXx 2 years ago 11
It would be interesting if ocean birds swooped at those flying fish and tried to eat them. It may speed the evolution of their flying capabilities up by killing the ones that are not as good at flying as their rivals are; thus genes for improved flying capabilities (agility, speed etc) spread through the population.
PR0GRAMMING 3 years ago 5
Frigatebirds regularly snatch them out of the air.
milvipes 3 years ago 3
i say its a evolved dragon fly
davencuban 3 years ago
Those seagulls are deviant bastards, screwing around with fish like that.
fantasy0coach 3 years ago 9
ha the best comment i've heard so far. thumbs up! =D
BruteForceAssault 3 years ago
Not denying the validity of the fact of evolution, but some idiots here are making it sound like the fish is an one-off freak of nature that just "morphed" yesterday.
Flying fish are so common in the tropical seas most seasoned mariners won't even give them a second look.
We need scientific knowledge to support the theory of evolution, not political fervor. Those ignorant fools are only weakening it.
milvipes 3 years ago 3
geological time scale is real
lakerskobe24mvp 3 years ago
is that real?
josh28anhot 3 years ago
Yeah, they are I've seen some before.
fc007 3 years ago
And so Allah said "Fly little fishie, fly!"
thruthem 3 years ago 2
and He saw that it was good.
OMGrenzhi 3 years ago 2
Who? I mean what?
heyjuju 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is no truth in evolution theory.
agrana75 3 years ago
empirical evidence suggests it is a very likely theory.
I tend towards evolution as opposed to a religious viewpoint because it seems to...erm....crap
pharos1 3 years ago 6
What you don't believe in burning talking bushes? I'll believe God was created in the image of an invisible God before I believe in observable evidence. Who really needs Science?
ateamga 3 years ago
one dumb comment i wish i new who you where so i could back hand your dumb ass who needs science come on man are you a fucking retard?
Neobloodzero86 3 years ago 3
Well, if you do not need science (which is evidence based reasoning), stop typing on that computer of yours. Don't take antibiotics when you are sick. Don't drive a car. Don't look through a telescope. Just strip naked and run off into the jungle.
PR0GRAMMING 3 years ago 4
lol
mrtnsamson 2 years ago