pompey and ceasar wer not friends, ceasar just married his daughter to pompey for political reasons, when his daughter died and he was strong enough to take on pompey, thats when he decided to challenge pompey and the senate.
As Caesar's infantry was outnumbered 2:1 and having 1000 cavalry units for Pompey's 7000, it is crucial to note that prior to the battle, he had figured out Pompey's strategy of how he was to conquer Caesar. Therefore, Caesar spent an enormous amount of time preparing his men for this and training his infantry units in innovative ways as to battle the flanking cavalry. This was how he ultimately defeated Pompey.
There are some serious generalized brushstrokes in this video to the point of inaccuracies. The author is forgoing an enormous amount of crucial information. The only thing worth watching or listening to is the actual military tactics used in the battle.
WHY do people forget the battle of Dyracchium?? It was Pompeys victory, and it forced Ceasr to make one of his biggest gambles: to march deeper into Greece.
Actually Pompey's army consisted largely of recent recruits rather than veterans. But the majority of Julius Caesar's army were veterans who had experience at Gaul. Not to mention Pompey abandoned his own army in the middle of the battle and fled, having a big impact on his soldiers.
@Rico8458 he was declared an enemy of the state by the senate. It was a civil war between to guys, Pompey fighting to keep old style rome alive, and Caesar whose angle was more beneficial to the everyday man, hence the popular support
This is crap,where`s the explanation about Caesar`s 4th line?which was not standard Roman doctrine and was something he devised on the day and that allowed him to neutralise the vastly larger Pompean cavalry and let his outnumbered but more experianced infantry win him the battle.
I dislike how they insist on calling the Republic an "Empire" years before it actually became one.
Even Julius Caesar cannot be called an "Emperor", he styled himself Consul for life until he was killed, and did not actually rule Rome for that long, the first actual "Emperor" was Octavianus Augustus, Caesar's adopted son.
Also, I agree with spinynorman230, this was not about who'd "Rule" Rome, this was just the Senate against a usurper, albeit a famous one. :P
@CalloftheWarrior1 Great Britain established the bulk of her empire after 1688 when Parliment gained its supremacy over the monarch by inviting in William
of Orange. You do not have to have an Emperor in order to have an Empire. The vast extent of Rome from Judea all the way to Spain and Gaul really did make it an Empire.
The battle did NOT determine who would lead Rome. Pompeii was forced by the senate to betray his friend, Caesar, and fight to preserve the senate by declaring war on Caesar. If Pompeii won, then the senate would be preserved, but the people would rebel if the senate told Pompeii to kill Caesar. And Caesar would do the same.
dont give people the whats for and know how if you cant even get it right yourself. I think you'll find Pompeii was a city covered by an eruption. Maybe you mean Pompey?
Maybe you should do a little more research than watching 'Rome'
do yourself a favour and go and open up a copy of Caesars book on the Civil Wars. And hes not an idiot, hes being told to say it like that by the director, who is the real idiot
@spinynorman230 Pompeii was a town that got volcano'd. Pompey was the general. And although they had ties of amicitia with each other, the populares nature they shared meant that these were very fickle and meant that they were power hungry.
Pompey would not really let the senate tell him to do anything. This is a bit innacurate in the fact that he too had an army of veterans who would support him; the senate had very little power when the two strongest armies of Rome were hostile to them.
@spinynorman230 LOL some historian you are! Pompeii is a Roman town which was covered by an erupting volcano, POMPEY was the Roman general, you dumbass!
@spinynorman230 It was actually Brutus who was forced to betray Caesar, Pompey and Caesar were enemies from the start. But Pompey did have something to do with the senate; they sponsored him.
@XxC0ldH3artxX It was both. The Senate was fucking pissed at Caesar because the Senate would lose all it's power. Once Pompeii failed, well, they sent in the assassins.
@spinynorman230 first he wasnt a city -pompey not pompeii thats under volcanic ash- and he was made dictator of rome,in which one man rules for one year and laws are nothing to that person, although they respected each other caesar had broken the law when he crossed the rubicon with his army, so whoever won this battle WOULD lead rome
Do you disagree with anything I have said? I notice neither you nor anyone else has commented on what I have said(other than to point out that 3 anonymous people on the internet gave my comment a 'thumbs down'[whatever that is supposed to be]'.
also Dodge; 'Caesar's array in line of battle did not differ as greatly from Hannibal's phalanx in the later battles of this war[the Civil War ed.], as it did from the legion of Marcellus or Nero'
also on the army Caesar inherrited from Marius; ' The legions were not now divided into simple Roman and allied...cavalry was raised...mostly from foreign elements...anyone physically qualified could bear arms'
These were revolutionary armies filled with mercenaries and arrayed in phalangial fashion.
The legion formations in this video are so inaccurate. See Theodore Dodge on Caesar's legion; 'The Legion descendened to Caesar in a new shape, one that Marcellus and Nero and Scipio would not have recognised.'
and:
'Caesar's legion more nearly approached that of the "simple phalanx" of the Greeks than that of the splendid body of burgess-soldiers, whose stanch front to disaster makes the Second Punic War so memorable a page in the annals of Roman courage and intelligence.'
I live in Pharsalus-Pharsala. The history of this town is huge. It's the birth place of Achilles, Polydamas and Voukefalas. The town is full of ancient ruins, a huge Acropolis and an tomb 6000 years old.
I thought that the Romans in the video was depicted wearing the lorica segmentata (banded armor), which was historically inaccurate in this time period. Bu then I noticed they were all in mail armor, although their helmets and shield was still off.
The legionnaires of this time period would have slightly oval scutum shield, not the square ones depicted. And their helmets were the simpler Montefortino, not the Gallic ones shown here.
2:40
I honestly really like these documentaries, but if you want to be taken seriously BBC, hahah dont talk about Julius Caesars tits -.-
sebbekung123 1 month ago
pompey and ceasar wer not friends, ceasar just married his daughter to pompey for political reasons, when his daughter died and he was strong enough to take on pompey, thats when he decided to challenge pompey and the senate.
69bumbaclat 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As Caesar's infantry was outnumbered 2:1 and having 1000 cavalry units for Pompey's 7000, it is crucial to note that prior to the battle, he had figured out Pompey's strategy of how he was to conquer Caesar. Therefore, Caesar spent an enormous amount of time preparing his men for this and training his infantry units in innovative ways as to battle the flanking cavalry. This was how he ultimately defeated Pompey.
westonj42 7 months ago
Comment removed
westonj42 7 months ago
Comment removed
westonj42 7 months ago
There are some serious generalized brushstrokes in this video to the point of inaccuracies. The author is forgoing an enormous amount of crucial information. The only thing worth watching or listening to is the actual military tactics used in the battle.
westonj42 7 months ago
WHY do people forget the battle of Dyracchium?? It was Pompeys victory, and it forced Ceasr to make one of his biggest gambles: to march deeper into Greece.
Strategos300 8 months ago 3
this is obviously different from rome total war
purefatdude2 8 months ago
@purefatdude2 no its far similar to rome total war
chinbitch 1 week ago
Actually Pompey's army consisted largely of recent recruits rather than veterans. But the majority of Julius Caesar's army were veterans who had experience at Gaul. Not to mention Pompey abandoned his own army in the middle of the battle and fled, having a big impact on his soldiers.
sunfireThu 10 months ago
Pompey's soldiers are the rebel colors in rome total war LOL
suchetti555 1 year ago 6
"control the whole Roman empire"
1. it was still a Republic at this time
2. Pompey was fighting to preserve the senate and the duumvirs
this programme is riddled with errors
TalonMercenary 1 year ago 5
copy that. fascinating history
Rico8458 1 year ago
wats the computer specs needed to play with so much men??
nuubez 1 year ago
caesar was a traitor of rome?
Rico8458 1 year ago
@Rico8458 no he betrayed the senate not rome he in fact faught for rome
Innogarrett 1 year ago
@Innogarrett actually he didn't exactly do that
Achilles9091 1 year ago
@Rico8458 he was declared an enemy of the state by the senate. It was a civil war between to guys, Pompey fighting to keep old style rome alive, and Caesar whose angle was more beneficial to the everyday man, hence the popular support
carde028 1 year ago
This is crap,where`s the explanation about Caesar`s 4th line?which was not standard Roman doctrine and was something he devised on the day and that allowed him to neutralise the vastly larger Pompean cavalry and let his outnumbered but more experianced infantry win him the battle.
ajb7876 1 year ago
Pompey not Pompeii
callawaygolf100 1 year ago
I it just me or is some of this video missing?
nutopiran 1 year ago 2
I dislike how they insist on calling the Republic an "Empire" years before it actually became one.
Even Julius Caesar cannot be called an "Emperor", he styled himself Consul for life until he was killed, and did not actually rule Rome for that long, the first actual "Emperor" was Octavianus Augustus, Caesar's adopted son.
Also, I agree with spinynorman230, this was not about who'd "Rule" Rome, this was just the Senate against a usurper, albeit a famous one. :P
CalloftheWarrior1 1 year ago 3
@CalloftheWarrior1 Great Britain established the bulk of her empire after 1688 when Parliment gained its supremacy over the monarch by inviting in William
of Orange. You do not have to have an Emperor in order to have an Empire. The vast extent of Rome from Judea all the way to Spain and Gaul really did make it an Empire.
rangerbobcat 1 year ago
The battle did NOT determine who would lead Rome. Pompeii was forced by the senate to betray his friend, Caesar, and fight to preserve the senate by declaring war on Caesar. If Pompeii won, then the senate would be preserved, but the people would rebel if the senate told Pompeii to kill Caesar. And Caesar would do the same.
spinynorman230 2 years ago 15
@spinynorman230 i think they are trying to make it sound interesting
showfire100 1 year ago
@showfire100 That does not exucuse wrong information.
spinynorman230 1 year ago
@spinynorman230
dont give people the whats for and know how if you cant even get it right yourself. I think you'll find Pompeii was a city covered by an eruption. Maybe you mean Pompey?
Maybe you should do a little more research than watching 'Rome'
kthanksbye
carde028 1 year ago
@carde028 um, no, they were spelled exactly the same, that's why the idiot narrator guy is mispronouncing it.
spinynorman230 1 year ago
@spinynorman230
do yourself a favour and go and open up a copy of Caesars book on the Civil Wars. And hes not an idiot, hes being told to say it like that by the director, who is the real idiot
carde028 1 year ago 2
@spinynorman230 Pompeii was a town that got volcano'd. Pompey was the general. And although they had ties of amicitia with each other, the populares nature they shared meant that these were very fickle and meant that they were power hungry.
Pompey would not really let the senate tell him to do anything. This is a bit innacurate in the fact that he too had an army of veterans who would support him; the senate had very little power when the two strongest armies of Rome were hostile to them.
berotti1 1 year ago
@berotti1 They were spelled the same. The point is- they confuse facts very easily, so it's best not to trust everything they say.
spinynorman230 1 year ago
@spinynorman230 LOL some historian you are! Pompeii is a Roman town which was covered by an erupting volcano, POMPEY was the Roman general, you dumbass!
XxC0ldH3artxX 9 months ago
@XxC0ldH3artxX ...Dude, they're spelled the same, they are pronounced differently. That's my only point.
spinynorman230 9 months ago
@spinynorman230 It was actually Brutus who was forced to betray Caesar, Pompey and Caesar were enemies from the start. But Pompey did have something to do with the senate; they sponsored him.
XxC0ldH3artxX 9 months ago
@XxC0ldH3artxX It was both. The Senate was fucking pissed at Caesar because the Senate would lose all it's power. Once Pompeii failed, well, they sent in the assassins.
spinynorman230 9 months ago
@spinynorman230 No, Pompey did not betray Caesar, they were rivals from the start. Somebody can't betray you if he already is your enemy.
XxC0ldH3artxX 9 months ago
@spinynorman230 WTf friends? really? hell no they were enemies what are you talking about and 11 people thumb up wtf
purefatdude2 8 months ago
@spinynorman230 first he wasnt a city -pompey not pompeii thats under volcanic ash- and he was made dictator of rome,in which one man rules for one year and laws are nothing to that person, although they respected each other caesar had broken the law when he crossed the rubicon with his army, so whoever won this battle WOULD lead rome
TheRugbyfullback 7 months ago in playlist Decisive Battles: Battle of Pharsalus
Do you disagree with anything I have said? I notice neither you nor anyone else has commented on what I have said(other than to point out that 3 anonymous people on the internet gave my comment a 'thumbs down'[whatever that is supposed to be]'.
HankQuinIan 2 years ago
also Dodge; 'Caesar's array in line of battle did not differ as greatly from Hannibal's phalanx in the later battles of this war[the Civil War ed.], as it did from the legion of Marcellus or Nero'
also on the army Caesar inherrited from Marius; ' The legions were not now divided into simple Roman and allied...cavalry was raised...mostly from foreign elements...anyone physically qualified could bear arms'
These were revolutionary armies filled with mercenaries and arrayed in phalangial fashion.
HankQuinIan 2 years ago
Comment removed
HankQuinIan 2 years ago
The legion formations in this video are so inaccurate. See Theodore Dodge on Caesar's legion; 'The Legion descendened to Caesar in a new shape, one that Marcellus and Nero and Scipio would not have recognised.'
and:
'Caesar's legion more nearly approached that of the "simple phalanx" of the Greeks than that of the splendid body of burgess-soldiers, whose stanch front to disaster makes the Second Punic War so memorable a page in the annals of Roman courage and intelligence.'
HankQuinIan 2 years ago
Is that why you have a -3
Oldcartoons571 2 years ago
Comment removed
HankQuinIan 2 years ago
There's a jump here that's a little confusing--from Pompeii forming battle order on the plain to the battle already under way. Hmm.
Bierreisender 2 years ago
My limit is 6.000 men on the battlefield. : /
nekwa2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cover your mouth with your hand
2. Make a wish
3.Close your hand (fist)
4. Hold your hand at heart for 5 seconds
5. Send this to 3 more videos
6. Tommorrow will be the best day ever
it actually worked
Money- you will find a wad of $200 in cash
Love- Your crush or lover will kiss you or ask you out
Drago1359 2 years ago
not in the late republic
LachyHanzo 2 years ago
i wish i could play it with all those men, covering almost the whole field....
Suppressingfire 2 years ago 42
I live in Pharsalus-Pharsala. The history of this town is huge. It's the birth place of Achilles, Polydamas and Voukefalas. The town is full of ancient ruins, a huge Acropolis and an tomb 6000 years old.
sfak5 3 years ago 2
seems to be a good town ;)
i hope i go to greece someday :D
dpsantos1994 2 years ago
Ugh, never mind, I see now the legionnaires are wearing chain mail in this video, I thought they were lorica segmentata.
HaNsWiDjAjA 3 years ago
And yet again, the History Channel people used the wrong type of legionnairres...
HaNsWiDjAjA 3 years ago
Comment removed
Lostprophetzzz 2 years ago
what kind of legions did caesar use?
EmperorArmand 2 years ago
I thought that the Romans in the video was depicted wearing the lorica segmentata (banded armor), which was historically inaccurate in this time period. Bu then I noticed they were all in mail armor, although their helmets and shield was still off.
HaNsWiDjAjA 2 years ago 3
not the helmets an shields
ColombianxXxNB 2 years ago
The legionnaires of this time period would have slightly oval scutum shield, not the square ones depicted. And their helmets were the simpler Montefortino, not the Gallic ones shown here.
HaNsWiDjAjA 2 years ago
dat was during da middle republic not after marians reform
ColombianxXxNB 2 years ago
he was first defeated at dyracchium which made pharsalus even more make or break for Caesar
McBinary 3 years ago 2
1:45 - 1:47: "mike, back row, new guy.
shinchan123450 3 years ago 5
HAHA, Nice job noticing that. :D
32silvercoins 3 years ago
???wat?
GajusJuliusCezaris 3 years ago
Ceaser didn't defeat anyone in Italy, there was no armies to fight him there.
deligthelf 3 years ago
He conquerd Spain hardly with any fights, just tactical manouvers, the man is a genius
arjanvanhoorn 3 years ago
Wonderfull
xScorpioN12x 3 years ago