Why does he have the need to tell you about this, instead of inventing something????????? Because hes trying to get you "to invest". Hes a scammer folks, just like meyers.
Thermodyanmics says that none of this is possible.... A first year chemical engineering student could write down the energy and ENTROPY balances to show that this is not possible to construct
In 1988 about 3 days after joining the navy a fellow in boot camp showed me a newspaper article of a man who used nothing but a superconductor spinning with a hole in the middle to flash expand hydrogen 1800x.
Now you can refuse to believe me, or you can try to understand how less than 1/100th of an amp at 12v to spin that dics was able to give 100hp.
@HereIsJesus You have a couple of major flaws and your argument. First amps is not a measurement of energy but watts or megajoule's is. So all of your calculations to determine how many amps you can produce has no bearing on the subject. Also your numbers are very inaccurate a capacitor with 40000V will not have a resistance anywhere near is low as you are quoting. Let's Do the Math
40000V X 509A = 20360000 Watts. There is no way that you can generate 20 Mega Watts
@HereIsJesus Energy can neither be created nor destroyed: it can only be transformed from one state to another. Remember the original source of energy in this case is either gasoline and or the battery not the hydrogen or the alternator remember hydrogen is an energy carrier only.
what alot of people dont seem to understand is It takes more torque to turn a alternator based on the draw, The larger the load you put on the alternator the harder it becomes to turn, the harder it is to turn the more fuel is required (not to mention puts alot of thermal stress on the alternator).
One watt is the rate at which work is done when one ampere of current flows through an electrical potential difference of one volt.
One coulomb, passing a given point each second constitutes one Ampere
Therefore
Amps, is a unit of electrical current it is not a measure of work that has been done. So you should not try to use it for determining how much work has been done because it creates a meaningless statement.
If Peter Lindemann is so sure of this technology why is he standing at the podium showing drawings made by a dead man? Where is his live demonstration showing Over Unity production of hydrogen and oxygen a perpetual gas producing machine?
If it is so easy to reproduce this technology then where is it?
I have not seen one car running on 100 percent HHO why because you and everyone else cannot break the laws of thermal dynamics.
@ke4uyp That's because your thinking with your 'human science' hat on. Nature doesn't abide to the human made law of 'thermal dynamics' and there has been technology made which defies this human law. Today's science of explosion/centrifugal causes fiction, heat, destruction, expiration, noise and is completely 180 degrees in the opposite direction to Natures law of implosion/centripetal causing no noise, cooling and regeneration of energy.
We are heading in the wrong direction due to greed.
Brawndo has replaced water virtually every where and that Brawndo purchased the FDA and FCC. In response to plan to correct the problem, White House cabinet members continuously repeated the Brawndo tag line, "Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes."
diaelectric medium and resonant circuit are key words, that most people missed when making their pitiful attempts at copying meyer and arriving at the conclusion it doesn't work. which after much contemplation is so like tesla, reich, etc, in storyline there isn't even the point of asking is it true, of course its f**** true!
so, how you ask? well, its helpful to understand teslas work first, and what a resonant circuit implies, and what diaelectric breakdown means, THEN start building.
Peter Lindemann, a patent from you that makes more sense than Meyers' woud do. Try and see if you can achieve this at least, before you waste precious time making mockery of another man's invention/patent ...why don't you spend that time inventing something useful?
@frakpu You got that right. I figured out Meyer and a bunch of others a long time ago and would share the details if it was not for moron slime like Linderman.
The key to figuring out Meyer is using stainless steel "COMPOSITE WIRE"
Gee, I wonder what that other metal was... Any fucking moron could have figured that out. "Blocking diode" what a sub moron...
Linderman is a moron. Meyer didn't have water in the tube cell he has air to make ozone.
Linderman is a "catastrophic failure ". Anybody that knows anything about electronics can tell by the terms he uses that he knows NOTHING.
Linderman thinks you can take that patent and replicate Meyer. Good luck with that moron, try looking at the actual dune buggy photos and it is all so obvious.
It takes more than a fake PHD to actually replicate or make sense of it.
Well you have a lot to say, but you obviously have no working knowledge of Meyer's work. Any patent is not easy to come by, he had many hho patents, all of which were OVER EFFICIENT.
The reason the hho fuel injector works, is the water droplets become capacitors which over-discharge to the level of +ionization. +Ions expand hydrogen, FACT, up to 1700x volume. THE FREE ENERGY comes from neutrino/boson flow opposition to and from our nearby black hole at galaxy center. This moves all atoms.
@AKAGl Gravity works in reverse, can you explain that? No you cannot, not using photons or superstrings, not even gravitons, the best physicists in the world, even Michio Kookoo cannot. Smaller particles like electron neutrinos 8333.333 smaller than the electron at mass .00012xE oppose very large particles leaving black holes to create gravity. Those large ones become neutrinos in decay. This is the only way to explain gravity, and how it reverses to repel meteors at the ionosphere, repel moon~~
@mikefromspace So what you are saying is you have knowledge of the universe that no other scientists in the world has except you therefore you are the smartest person in the world. Talk Is Cheap, for you to be correct you must backup what you say with tangible evidence and facts but of course you cannot do this.
@ke4uyp Why can't I ? I already have in my videos if you had even taken the time to watch but sure you didn't because you're just a troll. I have solved the most critical root source code to all field unifications using simple projective geometry. Yes I can do this and I did. If talk is cheap why don't you spend a few words and make comments on my videos based on your views of all the experimental evidence?
At no time did Meyer run a car on a tube cell without it being plugged in to outside source of power. The gas he produced was an energy carrier. he never got the car to run on it's own until he made the air gas processor to make ozone which when mixed with water produces H2O2 or hydrogen peroxide which is rocket fuel.
I wish that ignorant fag Linderman would kill himself.
Linderman is an idiot. Meyer made ozone in the gas processor. H2O + O3 ozone = hydrogen peroxide or H2O2 and is commonly used as rocket fuel.
Linderman and his butt boy who is the idiot that wrote quantum key are tools and fools.
The water vapor and ozone meet in the resonant cavity which has a piezo cylinder in the wall which cause the bond cleave which makes hydrogen and oxygen gas.
The voltage without amp influx is the ozone generator processor which has a capacitor tied to it. Very simple
Scam Meyers resonance water fracturing technique, great in theory except nobody is able to get it to work. So far the most efficient HHO gadgets out there are so horribly inefficient, they'll barely get back 20% of the energy going into them.
Dr Peter Lindermann was apparently given an honourable doctorate by his friend who is a doctor of natural medicine, lol
what scam the guys giving you the info free test it with a couple of scraps of stainless steel and you will see the basics no scam hes giving you a cheaper alternative to fossil fuel .
It appears we have another ID10T error PIBKAC errors abound
I do not have the pwm circuit yet, this is the supposed (most important design).
They are like 40 bucks on ebay.
Soon I will test with one for myself as the making of hho is simple, very simple. 2 pieces of platinum wire blued to a 9volt battery will produce hyrdogen as a simple cheap test, when you see it work, then you know huh? Id bet you havent testing anything and have no data to support this being a scam, if you do, post it please =-)
NO.. You use Platinum to ignite H+O To Produce e- Heat & H2O..
But you are right, this is no where near a scam.. it sounds so archaic to even discuss this point.. some people are meant to save the world.. and some are here to destroy it..
Don't try to change their minds.. focus on your research and remember that those Patents are "PCT-101" filed "US". Not to mention University and IUPAC acclaimed.. we'll have our laugh etched in History, sooner than you think...Hoorah......
I am trying this out..but I don't see a difference when using straight DC without the choke or diode. Maybe it is because I was using a transformer to make 12V DC from wall outlet...or perhaps I am not using enough plates...
Hint: density at normal temp+press is 0.09kg/cubic metre; 1 cu metre = 1000 litre.
Make a litre per 20s and you won't get a car very far.
If you have a working version, forget the Nobels you'd get for overturning laws of thermodynamics and showing all those scientists have theory of energy of chemical bonds wrong. I'll buy it off you. After an acceptable test under my control.
I wouldn't take too much notice of the word "moron" ! Everyone who thinks they know everything about anything considers everyone else to be a "moron" !
OK to start I dont know a lot about chemistry am a train mechanic. and I have heard you need so many litres per second or what every but we all know a car engine can run on Hydrogen or HHO but at what % per volume do we need and if a fuel has a calorific value is the value related to the speed of the burn or the length of time to burn a specific amount and is said amount under load the same.
Of course they can't explain it. This is about simple electrolysis - nothing more and nothing less. A 50% 'duty cycle' will produce 50% less water seperated, no 'magic' catastrauphic effect or any other such BS.
i watched a freind produce 1 litre of hydrogen fuel in twenty seconds it was collected in a plastic bottle we walked to his front yard he uncapped the bottle and ignited the gas and the bottle flew about thirty feet if you dont believe we have the ability to produce this energy for our own use your a moron... go watch porn or something
Fuck what everyone says, this technology is real and I built one myself. Stan Meyer was a genius and the oil industry killed him because they were scared he was going to shut them out of business. The oil industry is a bunch of dick sucking fags that eat camel shit and worship the devil. All Saudi Arabians are dirty towel head pieces of shit who roll around on flying carpets like aladins bitch ass. We all need to work together to find a way to mass produce this technology and stop those fuckers
Yes that is true. Linderman is an empty hat and anyone that knows anything about water fuel or electronics knows that by what he says and the terms he uses.
Linderman claims the circuit can not resonate because of the diode. I posted pictures of the circuit with 6 diodes resonating.
He just used the term "soft pulses" and claimed the chokes restricted voltage. Wrong idiot... The chokes restrict amp flow, produce voltage spikes and the circuit is an analog of a neon sign transformer.
The transformer produces voltage spikes (unless the SMPU produce "rounded" waveforms, introducing the diode is another way to *maybe* cause voltage spikes, the word 'choke' is self explanatory, it absorbs current rushes so as to, as he says, 'soften' the pulses. A choke is the opposite of an active element in a oscillator..
The choke is an inductor, the resonance creates a pulse forming network to resonant charge the cap. Read Meyer's notes - it is all there in black and white.
The word 'choke' implies that it is a filter element, any reactance are resonant, but if the resonant frequency is far off the applied frequency it acts as a filter due to the rise/fall times (and sometimes intended losses, or low Q)..
In this configuration I don't think it is ment to be resonating, as it is a diode pump setup.. which are a means to pump up a voltage, but usually handles low currents.
The setup allows a 'ramp' voltage rise until the dielectrica breaks down, then there is applied a 'wait period' for water to settle again between plates and process are repeated..
The variable resistor limits the charge current.
The transformers role is a bit unclear, but maybe the idea is
The proble with reactive elements and square waveforms are back EMF, which can produce HF voltage spikes that could trigger premature dielectrica breakdown, thus it's desirable to apply a snubber, or filter.
Ah yes sorry, it's a coil symbol.. and I can't read the text because the picture is so unsharp.
Bifilar? That technique is used to make non-reactant coils, that is, no self-inductance, which can be used for a range of things like antenna coils (resonant unless the Q is very low) or filters (ferrite)..
It can be a bitch to reverse engineer even simple things sometimes if you don't know the thinking behind it.
One aspect is storing magnetic energy in the coils to keep a current going for a prolonged period, this needs careful tuning tho..
And whatn he said about using seawater or whatever and that it would not affect the function seems a bit odd, since 'polluted' water is a conductor; 'leaky' - which would rule out the capacitor part..
Nope. Read all 350 pages of notes then study all the water fuel patents. The chokes are not equal and the patent is hardly the circuit. That is the nature of a patent.
oil controls the government, it is the one thing that we survive on as a nation i just watched a video last night that alsaka has a oil feild that is bigger than any found in the world and it was found in the 1970's, gas could be $1.00 a gallon, but if we don't buy from saudi our national debt would increase.
we are paying the national debt now through gas prices.and we going to war in iran cause they are going to release oil in euro's which would collapse the dollar to nothing. if they succeed
that's the whole idea, rockafellar set this up in the 60's,the problem is everything we make has some sort of oil product in it.
plastics,polyester,asphalt(the roads you drive on)and used to produce that product i.e natural gas. the second we start making our own oil we are screwed because saudi and iraq won't be buying our debt with the oil we buy.
oil comps. not making a dime compared to rockafeller and cronies, who actually distribute that oil. our dollar is based on oil now not gold.
there's nothing plain about hydrolysis. the implications and potential for applications in our society are groundbreaking and potentially a great step in the direction of the energy miracle we need. even if Stan's engine was not self-perpetuating beyond a certain point, refueling with water would obviously be far better than with fossil fuels. der! what have you done lately that's so important to anything but your ego?
must not have listened very well or look at his patents, sorry but this idea has been around since the 1820's. you don't think very much do you, look at the process that they wanna use for hydrgen in cars now, you can sit on the tamk full of hydrgen gas if you want, me i'll take water over a bomb waiting to be set off.that much hydrogen in a car would make a tank of regular gas look like a firecracker.
Ummm, well, see, if you had ever ever attended a science lecture, ahh, you would see that ahh, everybody talks that way, umm, especially science types who are, ah, NOT sales people.
@barflewk I did my own test, and you can be as skeptical as you like, but this really does work, I turned into a believer after I tried to debunk all of the HHO claims. Now I too drink the cool-aid. HHO Works!
@simnimbus you created hydrogen, big deal, anyone can power a car off 120v wall outlet electricity... really what tests did you actually perform, not some anecdotal personal guesses as to how much hydrogen you were producing please.
Why does this technology have to produce overunity {ie perpetual motion} lets just try to get an efficient engine that runs on hydrogen instead of fossil fuel{which by the way is not anywhere near efficient}
because no one is educating themselves to develop it themselves. Do not expect this technology to come to you from a company. It would be a conflict of interest for the greedy. You must make it yourself. go to school or just ask professors for help(most professors especially at jr collages are really out there to help). learn as much math, physics and chemistry you can. Materials are not that expensive if you use them from scavenging sources that you can get for free.
if anyone wants the meyer patents i have them and others have done it too. andrija puharich, his gives more detail, water decomposition by a/c electrolosis.
yeah it works, just do the math, math doesn't lie. you just can't beat a government loaned scientist, which is controlled by oil, think about how many reps got there hands in oil commodities.
Actually he is talking of electrical resonance in a series RC circuit as is in Meyer's patent. For a resonant circuit to work, electricity has to flow in bipolar direction, and therefore the diode debunks that. Dielectric breakdown is a real phenomenon, as is insulation breakdown in wires or in pcb's.
i just heard of this guy and all i can say is that when he had realized that no one was taking him seriously, he should've e-mailed his patants all over the world. that way, if this really worked, someone somewhere would eventually proved him right. so, if he had only the good intentions and not to make ridiculous amounts of money, he should've given it to the world... or just went to the japanese and got stupid rich:)))
u have said the smartest thing,i've ever heard about the free energy kooks. "NO ONE" is ever gonna profit from this,at least not in the beginning.u have to "PROVE" this shit works,u can't do that,and try and profit at the same time.i think this shit is real,because too many people have been killed.
Just curious, for those who claim it's possible to crack water into hydrogen and oxygen using less energy than you get out by reassembling water by burning hydrogen in oxygen: can't you close the loop by feeding the tailpipe back into the water tank, thereby making a machine that runs forever (assuming no mechanical failure and no leakage) and never needs to be refueled?
Try a google search on "GEET technology PICC (Pre-Ignition Catalytic Converter)". Looks mighty like a scam. GM is in danger of going broke because their cars are uncompetitive on fuel consumption. They are talking about discarding the Hummer and SUVs. Why not get them to adopt this technology? You can't tell me they'd rather go bust. Challenge: get a working version and report back. Only credible if you spend your own cash, and you aren't selling it. Or and add in "fraud" to the google search.
I know it's against the laws of thermodynamics, which some people here "think" were invented by the oil industry. If this stuff could work, there would be big money behind it.
@philipmach@philipmach what comes out the tail pipe might be helium or distorted molecules of some kind that you can't reuse, this was the problem with Stan's explanations he didn't even really know what was going on fully, he only knew partly (if it worked at all).
@maciejwrotek Maybe he meant he was trying to patent the idea using minimal information so it wouldn't be stolen, but patents don't work that way. You have to patent a workable process, otherwise it's not valid.
@philipmach yeah but protection idea with patents is in detailed description. It does not make any sense. Anybody who knows a little of electronics will see this is not water resonance because u can change the frequency of the circuit and have similar effect, is not it ? So, perhaps mayer did not understand what he was doing to the end.
@maciejwrotek "A method for obtaining the release of a fuel gas mixture including hydrogen and oxygen from water in which the water is processed as a dielectric medium in an electrical resonant circuit."
Now go back 10,500 years, find a HUGE stone building which uses water, quartz granite and resonance and look what's in the bedrock under it. I'll give you a hint, it's shaped like this. .^.
The 'resonance' thing he's talking about maybe coincides with the "cat on the bridge" concept which says that if you trap a cat on a bridge and he makes the same small footsteps back and forth, eventually the bridge will collapse. The amplitude of the vibrations builds up over time, etc. etc. In this case, the cat footprints are the small impulses of electricity and the bridge is the H2O which eventually collapses into Hydrogen and Oxygen. Just my two cents. Maybe it really works!
@Howardo8 This is LC circuit so it a has frequency, but in order to be a resonance it would have to resonate with something else. Water is not part of a circuit cause it is a dielectric, so it does not resonate with water .
Peter Lindemann: brought to you by your friends at Big Oil! If it did work? The millionaires at big oil would'nt be able to get rich while wprking class people like us struggle. They would'nt want that!
The circuit does resonate moron - build it. The chokes keep current from arcing and destroying the electrodes.. Da! It is a neon sign transformer.
I have replicated what Meyer was really doing and so have a bunch of others. When mass loses energy, it absorbs light. The water air mix went from 120PSI to nothing instantly and thus absorbs the light energy that is created when that mix becomes a nitrogen laser upon injection. The process instantly fractures the water. Linderman is a Moron!
Check out waterpoweredcar,com for details and documents for Stan's work. Also download Tesla 8.56gb torrent search - "tesla files as on april 2007" with loads of instructions of how to build some free nrg devices. Share this info with the world and try build one yourself. They don't want you to have this info. Free the world!!!
i saw the photo of his circuit design , i forgot the url, well it is on German language. with car ignition coil.hmmmm to clever! i have no idea about him, but still hoping to see personally his water car.
Why does he have the need to tell you about this, instead of inventing something????????? Because hes trying to get you "to invest". Hes a scammer folks, just like meyers.
tampicokeed 2 months ago
really this guy should be selling ice to the eskimos as he is selling his bull to some of you LOL
imrubicon 3 months ago
Meyers sais he was tapping the zero pint energy aether field....is this so?
wotan237 3 months ago
His PhD was given to him by a friend for "natural medicine". Douche...
mlawsonking 4 months ago
how ollllld is this video there still using a bulb projector for fuck sake i mean come on this shit can work now
gtothefinest 5 months ago
You do all realise this man is a fraudster, dont you?
He's selling books to gullible conspiracy theorists.
betamale3 6 months ago 5
In English please..?
AFitz1174 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrJohnmyatt 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrJohnmyatt 7 months ago
Thermodyanmics says that none of this is possible.... A first year chemical engineering student could write down the energy and ENTROPY balances to show that this is not possible to construct
Xero555000 7 months ago 2
Comment removed
MrJohnmyatt 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrJohnmyatt 8 months ago
In 1988 about 3 days after joining the navy a fellow in boot camp showed me a newspaper article of a man who used nothing but a superconductor spinning with a hole in the middle to flash expand hydrogen 1800x.
Now you can refuse to believe me, or you can try to understand how less than 1/100th of an amp at 12v to spin that dics was able to give 100hp.
mikefromspace 8 months ago
Comment removed
ke4uyp 8 months ago
Respond to this video... How Much energy was required to make the liquid nitrogen to make the superconductor?
ke4uyp 8 months ago
Comment removed
MrJohnmyatt 8 months ago
in fact i thought this guy was so smart......once...........fact is he gets lots of it wroung
irondmax 8 months ago
@HereIsJesus Your Video demonstrating Coulomb's Force Water Disassociation Capacitor was feeble at best.
I can produce 1000 times the amount of hydrogen that you demonstrated in this video
watch?v=WDi2b8dOiyM
With nothing more than 1 gram of aluminum sheet metal submerged in 29 milliliter's of water with 0.5 gram of KOH
No electricity is required at all it is purely a chemical reaction.
ke4uyp 8 months ago
@HereIsJesus You have a couple of major flaws and your argument. First amps is not a measurement of energy but watts or megajoule's is. So all of your calculations to determine how many amps you can produce has no bearing on the subject. Also your numbers are very inaccurate a capacitor with 40000V will not have a resistance anywhere near is low as you are quoting. Let's Do the Math
40000V X 509A = 20360000 Watts. There is no way that you can generate 20 Mega Watts
ke4uyp 8 months ago
@HereIsJesus Energy can neither be created nor destroyed: it can only be transformed from one state to another. Remember the original source of energy in this case is either gasoline and or the battery not the hydrogen or the alternator remember hydrogen is an energy carrier only.
ke4uyp 8 months ago
prime example of bad science createing even more bad science.
Lokivoid 8 months ago
watch?v=ecdTGc44C5g
sceptic33 9 months ago
@HereIsJesus You cannot run a car on HHO made from onboard electrolysis.
It takes 3 liters per minute of HHO to run a 1Hp engine
It takes at least 400 Watts of power to produce 3 liters of HHO per minute
It takes 1Hp from the engine to drive the alternator putting out 400 Watts of power to produce 3 liters of HHO per minute
This leaves no reserve power to do any other work like drive a generator or propel a car forward.
ke4uyp 9 months ago
@ke4uyp
what alot of people dont seem to understand is It takes more torque to turn a alternator based on the draw, The larger the load you put on the alternator the harder it becomes to turn, the harder it is to turn the more fuel is required (not to mention puts alot of thermal stress on the alternator).
Lokivoid 8 months ago
@HereIsJesus
One watt is the rate at which work is done when one ampere of current flows through an electrical potential difference of one volt.
One coulomb, passing a given point each second constitutes one Ampere
Therefore
Amps, is a unit of electrical current it is not a measure of work that has been done. So you should not try to use it for determining how much work has been done because it creates a meaningless statement.
ke4uyp 9 months ago
@HereIsJesus 100% efficiency of Faraday's laws of electrolysis requires 129.6 Watts to make one liter of HHO per minute
It takes 1 liter of HHO per minute for every 10cc of engine displacement
Scarecrow Labs ran his 3 1/2 horsepower 87cc generator successfully, but it
required to 1 liter per minute for each 10cc of engine displacement. So he had
to generate 9 liters per minute to run this tiny 87cc engine see video below.
/watch?v=VteoVsK93Mg
ke4uyp 9 months ago
@HereIsJesus
For an alternator to put out 14,913 watts which is equal to 20 hp
the input to the alternator must be twice this amount of energy
because alternator's are only 50 percent efficiency
this means your car engine would have to supply 40 hp or
29,826 watts of mechanical energy to drive the alternator
to produce the 14,913 watts necessary to make enough
HHO to produce only 20 Hp
of power
ke4uyp 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HereIsJesus
For an alternator to put out 14,913 watts which is equal to 20 hp
the input to the alternator must be twice this amount of energy
because alternator's are only 50 percent efficiency
this means your car engine would have to supply 40 hp or
29,826 watts of mechanical energy to drive the alternator
to produce the 14,913 watts necessary to make enough
HHO to produce only 20 Hp
of power
ke4uyp 9 months ago
For an alternator to put out 14,913 watts which is equal to 20 hp
the input to the alternator must be twice this amount of energy
because alternator's are only 50 percent efficiency
this means your car engine would have to supply 40 hp or
29,826 watts of mechanical energy to drive the alternator
to produce the 14,913 watts necessary to make enough
HHO to produce only 20 Hp
of power
ke4uyp 9 months ago
O. K. U. said it does NOT break ANY Laws of Thermodynamics.
Let's do the math
100 hp = 268.45 megajoule's
100 hp = 74,569 watts
1 liter of Hydrogen gas only has 0.012 megajoule's
20 hp is equal to an electrical energy of 14,913 watts
12V X 1242.75A = 14,913 watts
Where can you buy a alternator that puts out 14,913 watts
keep in mind this would only give you 20 brake horsepower
Also remember alternators are only 50 to 60 percent efficiency.
ke4uyp 9 months ago
Where is his live demonstration showing Over Unity production of hydrogen and oxygen a perpetual gas producing machine?
ke4uyp 9 months ago
now you know how ufos stay in the air
MtEVALs 10 months ago
I like how this person presents science :) very simple language and humour
maciejwrotek 10 months ago
so do i understand correctly, the condenser is shorted at the end and huge current passes through it at once ?
maciejwrotek 10 months ago
If Peter Lindemann is so sure of this technology why is he standing at the podium showing drawings made by a dead man? Where is his live demonstration showing Over Unity production of hydrogen and oxygen a perpetual gas producing machine?
If it is so easy to reproduce this technology then where is it?
I have not seen one car running on 100 percent HHO why because you and everyone else cannot break the laws of thermal dynamics.
ke4uyp 1 year ago 6
@ke4uyp That's because your thinking with your 'human science' hat on. Nature doesn't abide to the human made law of 'thermal dynamics' and there has been technology made which defies this human law. Today's science of explosion/centrifugal causes fiction, heat, destruction, expiration, noise and is completely 180 degrees in the opposite direction to Natures law of implosion/centripetal causing no noise, cooling and regeneration of energy.
We are heading in the wrong direction due to greed.
haeresy 9 months ago
@ke4uyp then go look for Daniel Dingel.. he'll show you what you're looking for. . .
arcanum59 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy machine , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
affluenceclm 1 year ago
the meyer followers are fucking stupid.
All their videos restrict comments because they are all frauds.
If you want "energy independance" as you so put it go ride a bike.
sephiroth671 1 year ago 2
Brawndo has replaced water virtually every where and that Brawndo purchased the FDA and FCC. In response to plan to correct the problem, White House cabinet members continuously repeated the Brawndo tag line, "Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes."
pliskin619 1 year ago
OG GOD HOW EVIL ARE THEY!!? WHY PEOPLE ARE SO DEEP INTO SLEEEEEEP!!?
Ebdan88 1 year ago
Bullshitometer just exploded.
ElPopularVale 1 year ago
diaelectric medium and resonant circuit are key words, that most people missed when making their pitiful attempts at copying meyer and arriving at the conclusion it doesn't work. which after much contemplation is so like tesla, reich, etc, in storyline there isn't even the point of asking is it true, of course its f**** true!
so, how you ask? well, its helpful to understand teslas work first, and what a resonant circuit implies, and what diaelectric breakdown means, THEN start building.
KKinsane2009 1 year ago
If it works it works, let's not argue people, let's get going . we have a uphill battle. let's aim for energy independence from the thugs in power
jellofast 1 year ago
we have to work together EVERYWHERE ,not only in project to make water like fuel,because only together We are Power
Xevoxdb 1 year ago
Peter Lindemann, a patent from you that makes more sense than Meyers' woud do. Try and see if you can achieve this at least, before you waste precious time making mockery of another man's invention/patent ...why don't you spend that time inventing something useful?
frakpu 2 years ago
@frakpu You got that right. I figured out Meyer and a bunch of others a long time ago and would share the details if it was not for moron slime like Linderman.
The key to figuring out Meyer is using stainless steel "COMPOSITE WIRE"
Gee, I wonder what that other metal was... Any fucking moron could have figured that out. "Blocking diode" what a sub moron...
QuarkToo 2 years ago
Linderman is a moron. Meyer didn't have water in the tube cell he has air to make ozone.
Linderman is a "catastrophic failure ". Anybody that knows anything about electronics can tell by the terms he uses that he knows NOTHING.
Linderman thinks you can take that patent and replicate Meyer. Good luck with that moron, try looking at the actual dune buggy photos and it is all so obvious.
It takes more than a fake PHD to actually replicate or make sense of it.
QuarkToo 2 years ago
Well you have a lot to say, but you obviously have no working knowledge of Meyer's work. Any patent is not easy to come by, he had many hho patents, all of which were OVER EFFICIENT.
The reason the hho fuel injector works, is the water droplets become capacitors which over-discharge to the level of +ionization. +Ions expand hydrogen, FACT, up to 1700x volume. THE FREE ENERGY comes from neutrino/boson flow opposition to and from our nearby black hole at galaxy center. This moves all atoms.
mikefromspace 2 years ago
@mikefromspace
Gravity is a conservative force.
AKAGl 1 year ago
@AKAGl Gravity works in reverse, can you explain that? No you cannot, not using photons or superstrings, not even gravitons, the best physicists in the world, even Michio Kookoo cannot. Smaller particles like electron neutrinos 8333.333 smaller than the electron at mass .00012xE oppose very large particles leaving black holes to create gravity. Those large ones become neutrinos in decay. This is the only way to explain gravity, and how it reverses to repel meteors at the ionosphere, repel moon~~
mikefromspace 1 year ago
@mikefromspace So what you are saying is you have knowledge of the universe that no other scientists in the world has except you therefore you are the smartest person in the world. Talk Is Cheap, for you to be correct you must backup what you say with tangible evidence and facts but of course you cannot do this.
ke4uyp 8 months ago
@ke4uyp Why can't I ? I already have in my videos if you had even taken the time to watch but sure you didn't because you're just a troll. I have solved the most critical root source code to all field unifications using simple projective geometry. Yes I can do this and I did. If talk is cheap why don't you spend a few words and make comments on my videos based on your views of all the experimental evidence?
mikefromspace 8 months ago
@AKAGl i thought it was a socialist force?
SeeProfileForDetails 1 year ago
Lindemann , Bedini and other from the same gang are morons
aemyu 2 years ago
At no time did Meyer run a car on a tube cell without it being plugged in to outside source of power. The gas he produced was an energy carrier. he never got the car to run on it's own until he made the air gas processor to make ozone which when mixed with water produces H2O2 or hydrogen peroxide which is rocket fuel.
I wish that ignorant fag Linderman would kill himself.
QuarkToo 2 years ago
Linderman is an idiot. Meyer made ozone in the gas processor. H2O + O3 ozone = hydrogen peroxide or H2O2 and is commonly used as rocket fuel.
Linderman and his butt boy who is the idiot that wrote quantum key are tools and fools.
The water vapor and ozone meet in the resonant cavity which has a piezo cylinder in the wall which cause the bond cleave which makes hydrogen and oxygen gas.
The voltage without amp influx is the ozone generator processor which has a capacitor tied to it. Very simple
QuarkToo 2 years ago
You make it sound so easy , have you built one yet ?
robbosdog 2 years ago
Scam Meyers resonance water fracturing technique, great in theory except nobody is able to get it to work. So far the most efficient HHO gadgets out there are so horribly inefficient, they'll barely get back 20% of the energy going into them.
Dr Peter Lindermann was apparently given an honourable doctorate by his friend who is a doctor of natural medicine, lol
UbeefHooked 2 years ago
Assumption is the key to failure.
sirHOAX 2 years ago
1 word...powerpoint
McConsumer 2 years ago
stan myers had his with little or no amp and pure water why is every one using koh or nhoi too bring up the amps he said he just had volts?
samking12 2 years ago
mmmmm, sounds like a lot of dry caca
peuama 2 years ago
nice
rcpastor777 3 years ago
Quoting
dtbakerqwe123ou
Dear Santa,
I want a pink pony to pull my generator around.
Ponies like water.
Thank you.
ROFLMAO
well gang just goes to show can lead a pony to water but can not make em drink LOL their loss
neven01 3 years ago
what scam the guys giving you the info free test it with a couple of scraps of stainless steel and you will see the basics no scam hes giving you a cheaper alternative to fossil fuel .
It appears we have another ID10T error PIBKAC errors abound
neven01 3 years ago
Thank you, apparently you've done your homework and you have a brain, unlike most of these knucklehead debunkers.
Bless you
RagingCaveman 3 years ago
My hho motor makes hydrogen just fine.
I do not have the pwm circuit yet, this is the supposed (most important design).
They are like 40 bucks on ebay.
Soon I will test with one for myself as the making of hho is simple, very simple. 2 pieces of platinum wire blued to a 9volt battery will produce hyrdogen as a simple cheap test, when you see it work, then you know huh? Id bet you havent testing anything and have no data to support this being a scam, if you do, post it please =-)
RobMonty248 3 years ago
NO.. You use Platinum to ignite H+O To Produce e- Heat & H2O..
But you are right, this is no where near a scam.. it sounds so archaic to even discuss this point.. some people are meant to save the world.. and some are here to destroy it..
Don't try to change their minds.. focus on your research and remember that those Patents are "PCT-101" filed "US". Not to mention University and IUPAC acclaimed.. we'll have our laugh etched in History, sooner than you think...Hoorah......
Major.. (*Xy'
MajorUtah 2 years ago
oh boy oh boy oh boy!!!!
I wasn't able to lose money on Stan's initial scam but I'm going to be able to lose money on this new and improved scam!!!!!
Perpetual motion machine explained to stupid people using humor.
Think of it this way: I put 3 quarters into an empty box and pull out a dollar - over and over....
clownjms 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
msg me back
IM FREAKIN HORNY! WP
VORACIOUSVIK 3 years ago
Meyers Steam Engine
/watch?v=YGp7hMUXjmI
LoneOarman 3 years ago
I am trying this out..but I don't see a difference when using straight DC without the choke or diode. Maybe it is because I was using a transformer to make 12V DC from wall outlet...or perhaps I am not using enough plates...
testmonkey008 3 years ago
This is good, this guy seems to understand what he is talking about...
MattBlytheTheOne 3 years ago
1 litre of hydrogen weighs how much exactly?
Hint: density at normal temp+press is 0.09kg/cubic metre; 1 cu metre = 1000 litre.
Make a litre per 20s and you won't get a car very far.
If you have a working version, forget the Nobels you'd get for overturning laws of thermodynamics and showing all those scientists have theory of energy of chemical bonds wrong. I'll buy it off you. After an acceptable test under my control.
BTW to say "your a moron" is self-referential.
philipmach 3 years ago
I wouldn't take too much notice of the word "moron" ! Everyone who thinks they know everything about anything considers everyone else to be a "moron" !
MattBlytheTheOne 3 years ago
OK to start I dont know a lot about chemistry am a train mechanic. and I have heard you need so many litres per second or what every but we all know a car engine can run on Hydrogen or HHO but at what % per volume do we need and if a fuel has a calorific value is the value related to the speed of the burn or the length of time to burn a specific amount and is said amount under load the same.
ex.
Make that next post
UNOMINER 3 years ago
example.
I have a 2 litre engine to pull a 1 ton load over a time period of 10 minutes-
Would I use same amount of fuel petrol diesel hydrogen or HHO. on the calorific value?
Sorry for being very ignorant on this simpler the better for me might help lot more people to understand.
I have made an engine run without a carb and only using pipework to create a venturi. but the HHO idea looks moe feasable to me and safer. Many Thanks
UNOMINER 3 years ago
Of course they can't explain it. This is about simple electrolysis - nothing more and nothing less. A 50% 'duty cycle' will produce 50% less water seperated, no 'magic' catastrauphic effect or any other such BS.
clownjms 3 years ago
i watched a freind produce 1 litre of hydrogen fuel in twenty seconds it was collected in a plastic bottle we walked to his front yard he uncapped the bottle and ignited the gas and the bottle flew about thirty feet if you dont believe we have the ability to produce this energy for our own use your a moron... go watch porn or something
palbert888 3 years ago
Dear Santa,
I want a pink pony to pull my generator around.
Ponies like water.
Thank you.
dtbakerqwe123ou 3 years ago
Fuck what everyone says, this technology is real and I built one myself. Stan Meyer was a genius and the oil industry killed him because they were scared he was going to shut them out of business. The oil industry is a bunch of dick sucking fags that eat camel shit and worship the devil. All Saudi Arabians are dirty towel head pieces of shit who roll around on flying carpets like aladins bitch ass. We all need to work together to find a way to mass produce this technology and stop those fuckers
pidos847 3 years ago 2
pidos847 u r right !!! u r my man.lets find a way to produce this thing,it seem to be simple enugh if u have all the scimatics.
vshart 3 years ago
Thermodynamics... You're doing it wrong.
AstarothNxx 3 years ago
I could bend those laws for your mind with a simple explanation
sdfab 3 years ago
It's so real it lives in my imagination. I hope your engine likes running lean.
AstarothNxx 3 years ago
i agree....why can't theses others fuckers understand that. one thing is for sure you can't fix stupid! lol
thirdeyetemple 1 year ago
According to aardvark-dot-co-nz,
"Peter Lindemann's PhD was apparently bestowed on him by a friend and is in the area of natural medicine."
Is this true?
cant7think7clearly 3 years ago
Yes that is true. Linderman is an empty hat and anyone that knows anything about water fuel or electronics knows that by what he says and the terms he uses.
Linderman claims the circuit can not resonate because of the diode. I posted pictures of the circuit with 6 diodes resonating.
He just used the term "soft pulses" and claimed the chokes restricted voltage. Wrong idiot... The chokes restrict amp flow, produce voltage spikes and the circuit is an analog of a neon sign transformer.
TeslaLight 3 years ago
its possible he has learnt stuff better in the interim, what, decade?:)
youarelackluster 3 years ago
The transformer produces voltage spikes (unless the SMPU produce "rounded" waveforms, introducing the diode is another way to *maybe* cause voltage spikes, the word 'choke' is self explanatory, it absorbs current rushes so as to, as he says, 'soften' the pulses. A choke is the opposite of an active element in a oscillator..
Kenzofeis 3 years ago
The choke is an inductor, the resonance creates a pulse forming network to resonant charge the cap. Read Meyer's notes - it is all there in black and white.
TeslaLight 3 years ago
The word 'choke' implies that it is a filter element, any reactance are resonant, but if the resonant frequency is far off the applied frequency it acts as a filter due to the rise/fall times (and sometimes intended losses, or low Q)..
In this configuration I don't think it is ment to be resonating, as it is a diode pump setup.. which are a means to pump up a voltage, but usually handles low currents.
Kenzofeis 3 years ago
The setup allows a 'ramp' voltage rise until the dielectrica breaks down, then there is applied a 'wait period' for water to settle again between plates and process are repeated..
The variable resistor limits the charge current.
The transformers role is a bit unclear, but maybe the idea is
1. secondary voltage increase (by factor of x)
2. isolating the diode pump from the SMPSU
Kenzofeis 3 years ago
The proble with reactive elements and square waveforms are back EMF, which can produce HF voltage spikes that could trigger premature dielectrica breakdown, thus it's desirable to apply a snubber, or filter.
Kenzofeis 3 years ago
"The variable resistor limits the charge current."
That is an adjustable choke symbol not a variable resistor.
The coils is wound bifilar and so the two sides react at different times and produce what Meyer termed rubber band effect.
TeslaLight 3 years ago
Ah yes sorry, it's a coil symbol.. and I can't read the text because the picture is so unsharp.
Bifilar? That technique is used to make non-reactant coils, that is, no self-inductance, which can be used for a range of things like antenna coils (resonant unless the Q is very low) or filters (ferrite)..
By "rubber band effect" do you mean hysteresis?
Kenzofeis 3 years ago
It can be a bitch to reverse engineer even simple things sometimes if you don't know the thinking behind it.
One aspect is storing magnetic energy in the coils to keep a current going for a prolonged period, this needs careful tuning tho..
And whatn he said about using seawater or whatever and that it would not affect the function seems a bit odd, since 'polluted' water is a conductor; 'leaky' - which would rule out the capacitor part..
Kenzofeis 3 years ago
Nope. Read all 350 pages of notes then study all the water fuel patents. The chokes are not equal and the patent is hardly the circuit. That is the nature of a patent.
TeslaLight 3 years ago
oil controls the government, it is the one thing that we survive on as a nation i just watched a video last night that alsaka has a oil feild that is bigger than any found in the world and it was found in the 1970's, gas could be $1.00 a gallon, but if we don't buy from saudi our national debt would increase.
we are paying the national debt now through gas prices.and we going to war in iran cause they are going to release oil in euro's which would collapse the dollar to nothing. if they succeed
juggernautxtr 3 years ago
but if we don't buy from saudi our national debt would increase.? Decreasing trade deficeit and increase domestic spending will help the US dollar.
Doc02864 3 years ago
that's the whole idea, rockafellar set this up in the 60's,the problem is everything we make has some sort of oil product in it.
plastics,polyester,asphalt(the roads you drive on)and used to produce that product i.e natural gas. the second we start making our own oil we are screwed because saudi and iraq won't be buying our debt with the oil we buy.
oil comps. not making a dime compared to rockafeller and cronies, who actually distribute that oil. our dollar is based on oil now not gold.
juggernautxtr 3 years ago
our dollar is based on "NOTHING" not gold or oil. therfore worthless.
myleftnutts 3 years ago
The Stanley Meyers engine is a hoax.
It's nothing more than plain hydrolysis.
The make up some fancy names to make people think it is something new.
hogepriestertoet 3 years ago
there's nothing plain about hydrolysis. the implications and potential for applications in our society are groundbreaking and potentially a great step in the direction of the energy miracle we need. even if Stan's engine was not self-perpetuating beyond a certain point, refueling with water would obviously be far better than with fossil fuels. der! what have you done lately that's so important to anything but your ego?
flowerspawn 3 years ago
must not have listened very well or look at his patents, sorry but this idea has been around since the 1820's. you don't think very much do you, look at the process that they wanna use for hydrgen in cars now, you can sit on the tamk full of hydrgen gas if you want, me i'll take water over a bomb waiting to be set off.that much hydrogen in a car would make a tank of regular gas look like a firecracker.
juggernautxtr 3 years ago
sure oil man! now can u tell me where i can get "$400.00 a gallon gas?.
myleftnutts 3 years ago
Ummm, well, see, if you had ever ever attended a science lecture, ahh, you would see that ahh, everybody talks that way, umm, especially science types who are, ah, NOT sales people.
MaxOrbit 3 years ago
I built a car that runs on sweet dreams and happy thoughts, it's exhaust is rainbows. Now government oil spys are trying to kill me.
barflewk 3 years ago 6
So that's why i get depressed every time i see a rianbow !
popeye11068 3 years ago
@barflewk I did my own test, and you can be as skeptical as you like, but this really does work, I turned into a believer after I tried to debunk all of the HHO claims. Now I too drink the cool-aid. HHO Works!
simnimbus 1 year ago
@simnimbus you created hydrogen, big deal, anyone can power a car off 120v wall outlet electricity... really what tests did you actually perform, not some anecdotal personal guesses as to how much hydrogen you were producing please.
SeeProfileForDetails 1 year ago
@SeeProfileForDetails I'm not even sure if you deserve this information.
HHO only needs to be 4% of the air fuel mix to see the real world effects of this type of fuel combination.
As far as your comment about powering a car off of a 120v outlet. Where did you get that crap from? No outside power was ever used.
3000LB 3.0L V6 @ 70mph with A/C on for 200 miles. Before HHO 23mpg. After HHO 46mpg! thats 50% better.
I run my prototype cell all the time now. Keep buying that expensive gas moron.
simnimbus 1 year ago
Why does this technology have to produce overunity {ie perpetual motion} lets just try to get an efficient engine that runs on hydrogen instead of fossil fuel{which by the way is not anywhere near efficient}
BillyJackets 3 years ago 2
Lindeman seems to be validating Stan Meyers idea so whats the problem why are we still using gasoline if this technology is so widely known?
btmeng 3 years ago
because no one is educating themselves to develop it themselves. Do not expect this technology to come to you from a company. It would be a conflict of interest for the greedy. You must make it yourself. go to school or just ask professors for help(most professors especially at jr collages are really out there to help). learn as much math, physics and chemistry you can. Materials are not that expensive if you use them from scavenging sources that you can get for free.
reaperhatch86 3 years ago 2
M-O-N-E-Y!
BrotherBar 3 years ago
This explains why oil prices are jumping up like crazy right now.
Those Neo-Con oil jerks know that the jig is up and they are trying to capitalize in the final minutes.
When the dust settles let's hang those bastards!
z8it 3 years ago
i share your view. petrols prices will tremendously go down soon and oilscammers already knew that fuel technology can no longer be suppressed.
nebuIar 3 years ago
if anyone wants the meyer patents i have them and others have done it too. andrija puharich, his gives more detail, water decomposition by a/c electrolosis.
yeah it works, just do the math, math doesn't lie. you just can't beat a government loaned scientist, which is controlled by oil, think about how many reps got there hands in oil commodities.
juggernautxtr 3 years ago
Actually he is talking of electrical resonance in a series RC circuit as is in Meyer's patent. For a resonant circuit to work, electricity has to flow in bipolar direction, and therefore the diode debunks that. Dielectric breakdown is a real phenomenon, as is insulation breakdown in wires or in pcb's.
zad1262 3 years ago
i just heard of this guy and all i can say is that when he had realized that no one was taking him seriously, he should've e-mailed his patants all over the world. that way, if this really worked, someone somewhere would eventually proved him right. so, if he had only the good intentions and not to make ridiculous amounts of money, he should've given it to the world... or just went to the japanese and got stupid rich:)))
djole210 3 years ago
u have said the smartest thing,i've ever heard about the free energy kooks. "NO ONE" is ever gonna profit from this,at least not in the beginning.u have to "PROVE" this shit works,u can't do that,and try and profit at the same time.i think this shit is real,because too many people have been killed.
myleftnutts 3 years ago
good info thanks
videowatcher4u 3 years ago
Just curious, for those who claim it's possible to crack water into hydrogen and oxygen using less energy than you get out by reassembling water by burning hydrogen in oxygen: can't you close the loop by feeding the tailpipe back into the water tank, thereby making a machine that runs forever (assuming no mechanical failure and no leakage) and never needs to be refueled?
philipmach 3 years ago 5
Yes, this is called GEET technology. I hear there is something commerical comming called a PICC (Pre-Ignition Catalytic Converter).
kdessinger 3 years ago
Try a google search on "GEET technology PICC (Pre-Ignition Catalytic Converter)". Looks mighty like a scam. GM is in danger of going broke because their cars are uncompetitive on fuel consumption. They are talking about discarding the Hummer and SUVs. Why not get them to adopt this technology? You can't tell me they'd rather go bust. Challenge: get a working version and report back. Only credible if you spend your own cash, and you aren't selling it. Or and add in "fraud" to the google search.
philipmach 3 years ago
What you're describing is against the laws of thermodynamics.
AstarothNxx 3 years ago
I know it's against the laws of thermodynamics, which some people here "think" were invented by the oil industry. If this stuff could work, there would be big money behind it.
philipmach 3 years ago
@philipmach @philipmach what comes out the tail pipe might be helium or distorted molecules of some kind that you can't reuse, this was the problem with Stan's explanations he didn't even really know what was going on fully, he only knew partly (if it worked at all).
SeeProfileForDetails 1 year ago
@philipmach "how to protect idea without leading people to understand what was going on " What is that mean ?
maciejwrotek 9 months ago
@maciejwrotek No idea. I didn't write that.
philipmach 9 months ago
@philipmach i know, lindemann said that
maciejwrotek 9 months ago
@maciejwrotek Maybe he meant he was trying to patent the idea using minimal information so it wouldn't be stolen, but patents don't work that way. You have to patent a workable process, otherwise it's not valid.
philipmach 9 months ago
@philipmach yeah but protection idea with patents is in detailed description. It does not make any sense. Anybody who knows a little of electronics will see this is not water resonance because u can change the frequency of the circuit and have similar effect, is not it ? So, perhaps mayer did not understand what he was doing to the end.
maciejwrotek 9 months ago
Comment removed
haeresy 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@maciejwrotek "A method for obtaining the release of a fuel gas mixture including hydrogen and oxygen from water in which the water is processed as a dielectric medium in an electrical resonant circuit."
Now go back 10,500 years, find a HUGE stone building which uses water, quartz granite and resonance and look what's in the bedrock under it. I'll give you a hint, it's shaped like this. .^.
haeresy 9 months ago
The 'resonance' thing he's talking about maybe coincides with the "cat on the bridge" concept which says that if you trap a cat on a bridge and he makes the same small footsteps back and forth, eventually the bridge will collapse. The amplitude of the vibrations builds up over time, etc. etc. In this case, the cat footprints are the small impulses of electricity and the bridge is the H2O which eventually collapses into Hydrogen and Oxygen. Just my two cents. Maybe it really works!
Howardo8 3 years ago
@Howardo8 This is LC circuit so it a has frequency, but in order to be a resonance it would have to resonate with something else. Water is not part of a circuit cause it is a dielectric, so it does not resonate with water .
maciejwrotek 9 months ago
interesting, that the video drawings dont match stans PDF file. waterpoweredcar "dot" "com" / stan "dot" html
Youtube doesnt want the link in the email. Keeps you stupid
playwfire 3 years ago
Nice post thanks
jakeasturm 3 years ago
Peter Lindemann: brought to you by your friends at Big Oil! If it did work? The millionaires at big oil would'nt be able to get rich while wprking class people like us struggle. They would'nt want that!
WayneAlexanderM 3 years ago
The circuit does resonate moron - build it. The chokes keep current from arcing and destroying the electrodes.. Da! It is a neon sign transformer.
I have replicated what Meyer was really doing and so have a bunch of others. When mass loses energy, it absorbs light. The water air mix went from 120PSI to nothing instantly and thus absorbs the light energy that is created when that mix becomes a nitrogen laser upon injection. The process instantly fractures the water. Linderman is a Moron!
TeslaLight 3 years ago
Oh.......then show us your work...
popeye11068 3 years ago
@TeslaLight avalanche diode?
SeeProfileForDetails 1 year ago
Lindeman does not know what he is talking about. No wonder he had to buy a fake PHD.
Meyer was a tool that worked for Batelle which is owned by Carlyle and owned by Bush who works under Rockafeller's Standard Oil monopoly.
Meyer did not produce HHo or H2O2 but he sure did fool everybody. It is possible to run an car on water but EVERYBODY missed how to do it.
Why do you think Stan created a steam resonator? Think about it.
IdiotSlapper 4 years ago
Check out waterpoweredcar,com for details and documents for Stan's work. Also download Tesla 8.56gb torrent search - "tesla files as on april 2007" with loads of instructions of how to build some free nrg devices. Share this info with the world and try build one yourself. They don't want you to have this info. Free the world!!!
sifromeire 4 years ago
i saw the photo of his circuit design , i forgot the url, well it is on German language. with car ignition coil.hmmmm to clever! i have no idea about him, but still hoping to see personally his water car.
12783APO 4 years ago
really cool! low amparage, high voltage. using step up inductor... like what Tesla using?
hmmm like Daniel Dingel's using as a controller for his hydrogen reactor, i think!
12783APO 4 years ago
Hi
I'm still not sure whet Dingel did exactly.
There is not much info on it is there?
popeye11068 4 years ago
Dingel invented lots of things. Like Meyer, you cant expect it to be a single static technology that you can understand in 2 min.
For example, Dingel developed a special magnetic wire. There is no question there is lots of energy in back emf, the question is how to extract it.
It is still not enough to power a car.
His earlier car used a little bit of oil and salt as an electrolyte. He probably upgraded every part since that time.
We had 200+ mpg cars in 1905 - that we know for sure.
gabydewilde 3 years ago
Could you tell me where you got the info on the 1905 car that got 200 mpg? Thanks
shark61111 3 years ago