ADNmt/cromosoma Y patrones migratorios: nórdicos vikingos/ esclavas irlandesas, conquistadores españoles (europeos) / colombianas. Si asquenazis son geneticamente hablando indistinguibles de los palestinos (de oriente medio y descendientes de Abraham) A los españoles en latinoaméricas los llaman "gallegos" ¿eran españoles mezcla d moros y hebreos sefardies cuando llegaron a Colombia?¿lo son ahora?
Se puede forzar coito ¿y la gestación + cuidados para hijo d emigo violento?
It obviously makes it even more funnier when one of the most smartest and innovative in his field is 16% African. Who he claimed those people were inferior and less intelligent.
Nor James Watson could never significantly prove such a claim, he only said it out of terms dealing with the fact he grew up in segregated and racial times.
African-Americans have innovated field of technology and if you knew anything about African-American inventors or some like Dr. Ben Carson and other's realize most of things we use to today was invented by a black man. I don't use that whole stupid unjust scheme that whites are naturally smarter. It's not true, no one is naturally smarter than someone when it comes to race.
Race is a social construct it doesn't exist. their is no race gene for intelligence or for inferiority can you show me?
The irony being that he has16% more black DNA than the average white. He must really curse at himself every time he looks at the mirror. I can only imagine God sitting in the heavens laughing at Watson and saying, " Gotcha, you got got."
@Shortyjored88 Did you even watch the video, or did you just come here to ridicule the man? He has a PhD in Genetics, deduced the double helix structure of DNA, has made significant contributions to cancer research, plus gained countless other achievements throughout his life. What do you have, and what have you done? Don't be so quick to judge someone.
@TheSiqLad I could also ask you that question? What does it matter that he is a genetics? How many of us in this forum would be a genetics? Not everyone is born to be scientist, it doesn't mean that I am any less accomplished. I'm not attacking him for his accomplishment, but rather for making claims about a group of people without backing it up. The irony being that the blood of those he has belittle is running through his veins. Even his fellow scientist don't agree with his claims.
@Shortyjored88 Valid question sir. My mother studied an MBA at Harvard. She didn't come from money, and as a young person was often ridiculed because of her culture heritage. She raised me as a single parent. I was born in the U.S. and moved to Australia when I was 12, and hold triple citizenship. At H.S. undertook the International Baccalaureate Diploma, and have a B.A. in Media and Communications majoring in Government and International Relations, Marketing, with a minor in Cultural Studies.
@Shortyjored88 I would refer you to this video which is right on this page: /watch?v=aequ-goKOBE&feature=related. Please understand I am not trying to be spiteful, but when you make a comment about a man cursing himself, just because you don't agree with him, you're going to get challenged.
@TheSiqLad I don't care if he won a nobel peace prize after piggy backing from another scientist accomplishment; my problem isn't based on what he accomplished; it should not make anyone immune to criticism especially when they are wrong. He even knows he was wrong, this is why he had to save face and apologize after he realized his fellow scientist dubbed his study as inaccurate. He should be grateful for his black ancestors, he needed their DNA to exist no matter how dumb he thinks they are.
@Shortyjored88 The claim I believe you are referring too is one he made about Africa as a geographical location, not race. In my experience, on average Africans are not as capable as non-Africans (ie Asians, Indians, Europeans) with issues requiring a high level of intellect. That not to say that all people of African heritage are dumb, of course not. I have met many black people who would make many white people look like fools. It simply is a statement based on observations taken 'as a whole'.
In programming the program will work when only 80% of the code is correct. Microsofts rule, if it's 80% it's good. : ) A former programming major, now a physics major
I am not the brightest person in the room, I was in Earth Science today and had many questions. I voiced the question and the professor said "I don't have an answer to your question, but I like your hypothesis". Hopefully I myself will earn my Ph. D. and help to add a piece of knowledge to the puzzle. One Love weather a believer in a Creator or not, I love you, and I love science.
Well first of all, Charles Darwin didn't prove that life evolved... there's no proof of that whatsoever. If you think that it's true, then where are all the gradual transitional species today? Chimpanzees and man are 1.8% different genetically speaking (which is huge) and that is about 48 million nucleotides. Where's all the gradual transitions in between? Or birds and lizards for that matter?
Secondly, How is it that DNA molecules have these instructions? The DNA language is like a program
@TheSmoonge Creationists videos are on YouTube if you want to continuing believing in refuted arguments. Pro science channels are on YouTube as well, cdk077, DonExodus2, and AronRa are good places to start. If you like reading, pick up Why Evolution Is True. Simple and easy to understand.
@davidcici11 I know right! Since he is so smart can he perform one last great feat? Figure how the bloody he managed to overcome his 16/18% 'defect' he was previously unaware of to win the peace prize. Hmm.
@FIGHTFANNERD3 That is a non-scientific assertion.There is no intelligence gene someone can inherit. There is no suprise whites score higher. Koreans score considerably less in Japan on IQ scores, but when they come to the United States they score higher than Japanese.
Does that mean Koreans are smarter than Japanese? Or ice versa. African migrants score higher than African-Americans on IQ scores, same with Mexican immigrants who score higher than Mexican-Americans. Can you explain this?
yes the brain is plastic you can change your intelligence blah blah blah with that said, people ARE genetically predisposed towards certain traits, and intelligence is one of them.
could a horse master calculus if it studied vigorously? could a frog learn shakespeare?
It's amazing how many are making comments about the IQ-tests, the heredity of the g factor and genetics, although it's obvious that they don't have the slightest clue what they are talking about. How about taking the time and study the research that have been done, conclusions that have been made and what these are based on, before starting writing cocksure statements about the subject? You can't see how heredity can be judged by twin- and adoptionstudies? Well, how about reading them, then?
it's one huge conspiracy. its the evil white mans attempt to lower black IQ scores in every country, culture, and economic status they're introduced to throughout europe and the rest of the world. that must be it!
@romanpr1nce No there's no conspiracy you're just an idiot who refuses to look at actual studies and instead looks at pseudoscience, guessed IQ numbers, and White Nationalist propaganda. You just don't understand what a control variable is and try to use your own personal incredulity to determine things.
In controlled studies like Barbara Tizard's black children age 4-5 had IQs of 108, white children 103, and mixed children 106.
@UnnaturallyNatural the only one refusing to look at studies is you. you can refuse statistics, IQ levels of the different races which are consistent regardless of country or social status, you can refuse any science, test score, or anything else and you will remain in denial.
but you can keep thinking it's just a conspiracy. black people can really fly it's just biased white studies which say they can't.
black people have lower IQs because they didn't need to evolve the same brains as whites.
@romanpr1nce And a math test measure intelligence? How the fvck is it that I'm black and my IQ is 140-150, 80 pts above the supposed African IQ. And I'm nothing special just somebody who reads a lot and applies himself seriously. My father was rather sharp and skilled but not intellectual like my siblings. The difference between my IQ and that of my sibs is that I took education seriously, hence a higher IQ. I've always been first in white predominant classes. 1st not 2nd! This is all bullsh!t.
@TemplarX2 "And a math test measure intelligence? How the fvck is it that I'm black and my IQ is 140-150,"
i lol'd
regardless of how smart you think you are that doesn't change the incredibly low average of blacks. iq's which compare to mentally retarded europeans. "i have iq of a billion! i are smart"
i'm sorry if you think "IQ tests" are racist
and that tests and school grades are racist
and science and maths is racist toward blacks.
sad really. and no, intelligence is not "bullshit"
@TemplarX2 Obviously not intelligent enough to fairly judge the intelligence of other people? So what if you are the smartest guy in yuor white class?
For a while (maybe still), the tallest guy in Basketball was from North Korea, which has the world's shortest people (Due to lack of food and being chinese).
What if the "tallest basketballer in the world" said: "How the fvck is it that I'm vietnamese and my height is 210cm, 80cm above the supposed vietnamese height, and I'm nothing special"?
@noobenstein I will believe when they fully understand intelligence and develop a more reliable method. IQ tests are not reliable! I believe in hard work and learning and that intelligence is more elastic than any other physical attribute. I'll give you just one example. Geeks are supposed to intelligent but they are socially awkward! Why is that? Because the area of the brain that helps to interpret others emotions and mannerism is under-trained. This is a serious intellectual deficiency!
@noobenstein I don't really mean hard work but working smart or working efficiently, methodically. "Work hard" motto rather than the work smart one will only make you a peasant.
He took Rosalind Franklin's Ideas. He would have never of got he double helix shape if Franklin haden't taken those close up pictures. He got fired from cambridge university for spying on franklin and wilkins ideas and attempting to make a model of DNA. It was a crappy model. Watson then snuck into rosalyn franklins DNA lecture and stole her ideas. Rosalind franklin was the true discoverer.
HIS FINDING AS PART OF A GROUP OF PEOPLE ALTHOUGH INCREDIBLY PERTINENT TO THE MODERN WORLD ALSO LEAVES ME DISCOURAGED, BECAUSE I FEEL HE IS REVERED TOO MUCH AS SOME SAVIOUR OF THE MODERN SCIENTIFIC WORLD... HE IS NOT THAT, HE DUBIOUSLY DISCOVERED THE STRUCTRUE OF A MOLECULE ***NOTHING MORE*** HE IS NOT A BIOCHEMIST OR CELL BIOLOGIST HE IS A STRUCTURAL CHEMIST AND A LYING ONE PRONE TO GAFFES AT THAT. HE WAS SACKED FROM COLD SPRING HARBOUR FOR A VERY VERY GOOD REASON. STUPID MAN
forming organs and new species ~it looks possible when subject the nucleotides/nitrogen bases in suitable nuclear reaction conditions and some media , it mean like in Urey-miller experiment the formation of amino acids take place after subjecting the water, methane ,ammonia , hydrogen to electric discharge .at the beginning of primordial earth ,nuclear substances present in the earth leaded to the mutations and genetic changes and hence rate of, evolution proportional to the nuclear reaction
Every organism- humans, plants, animals and etc. come from the same exact original cell. The theory was pronounced by Charles Darwin and accepted as a scientific document later on. Meaning..you have same DNA with every living thing in this world. The concept of karma yet solves another piece of a puzzle. Wishing others well, you get well. Wishing others evil, you get evil. What one critics in others, those are his precise flaws..How one sees the world, that is exactly how one sees himself..
Well I'm the winner of this debate as usual....anyone can double-check any statement I made here....most Greeks are haplogroup J2 and E1b1b according to every peer-reviewed source
"Paleolithic Y-haplogroup heritage predominates in a Cretan highland plateau," European Journal of Human Genetics (2007) 15, 485–493, Cariolou et al. 1998
Southern Europeans like Greeks and Italians seem to have little genetic connection to Northern, Western, and Eastern Europeans
"The mean absolute difference between twins is 6.60 (SD=5.20), the largest difference being 24 IQ points. The frequency of large twin differences is no more than would be expected from the normal probability curve." - Identical Twins Reared Apart, Arthur Jensen
Identical twins have the exact same DNA. In order to show that different groups of people have different IQs you have to isolate the variables influencing IQ so that the conclusion doesn't violate Occam's razor
lol these dumb Europeans don't know what science even is....whenever confronted with science, logic, and reasoning instead of attempting to refute a statement all they do is say "political correctness" even though no one is using political correctness, just science and logic
If someone provides IQ data of different people, in different education systems, different countries, different health, different wealth, different study habits, and says "OMG their IQs are different" that is not surprising
@UnnaturallyNatural you seem to be in denial with genetics. if you knew anything about genetics you'd know greeks are a mix of nordic/doric. they're indo-european and if you knew anything about the "white" race, you'd know "white" is not a race. as far as genetics go, they show that greeks migrated from northern europe many thousands of years ago. im sorry you can't accept them as white, it hurts you for some reason. but whites don't need to claim greatness, only you do.
@Hitlerrrchan Actually not, the Arab Alhazen invented the scientific method....just goes to show how uneducated and misinformed these dumb Europeans are
@Hitlerrrchan yes dog breeds are also a social construct.....that's why even though Eskimos and Native Americans are genetically East Asian they're not viewed as East Asian because race is a social construct...and they also have very different IQs
I didn't say all groups of people are the same
James Watson and Richard Lynn are just dumb liberal atheist trying to spread their liberal racist propaganda
@UnnaturallyNatural or they're scientists who speak a very basic truth. a truth which most people know in the back of their heads but shut it off. you know there are not only differences in IQ between the different races, but that there are some races more prone to violence. you know this but you vehemently deny this to yourself. you can believe what ever liberal fantasies you want, but in the end you'll always know.
@Hitlerrrchan except that James D. Watson and Richard Lynn are both LIBERAL atheists fool
You're just trapped in denial and don't even understand what science even is just like a typical gullible white\racist
Do you know what a control variable is?
If you wanted to irrefutably show some group as having higher IQs what would you need to do is get the same education system, same study habits, same wealth level, same level of education, and then test IQs of different groups fool
@UnnaturallyNatural you sound very defensive. but when a race of people have a consistently lower IQ, it tends to mean they're not as intelligent. and european achievement clearly defines european minds. it clearly defines your fear of them as well. sorry it makes you uncomfortable to bring up such subjects. they appear to effect you emotionally. you don't have to accept them as fact of course, you seem well versed in ignoring history, genetics, logic, and common sense.
Can someone elaborate on the left-handed gene thing? Does it mean that those who are right handed are really ambidextrous and are just used to writing with the right hand? I know a friend who writes& does the usual stuff with his right but eats with a spoon or whatever with his left.
... Plant & animals are sparse in the cold, so one has to plan & be more creative with what's there. In warm environments, food is abundant, clothing is not mandatory, & life is not mentally stimulating. This is why Eskimos have higher IQs than other Natives, as well as why Europeans & Orientals are the two groups with the highest IQs. So they may have started off poor due to the Ice Age, but when they adopted the right techniques, they put their better evolved brain to work & thrived
From my experience studying IQ and cultural contributions it seems people of Northern latitudes like Europeans, Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans are smarter. You have to remember that these people evolved in an Ice Age, and were only just coming out of one 10,000 when Agriculture began. Thus, they had a later start. But in the process, the cold environment improved their brain a lot more than tropical populations. It's much more intellectually demanding to live in cold climates than hot ones
@IAmSoRich the climate theory is just racist nonsense. How do you distinguish colder climates making people less intelligent from hotter climates making people less intelligent? Surviving in desert like conditions is demanding just like surviving in cold conditions
Lots of geniuses were from areas that had hot climates
There's really only been a few Europeans out of hundreds of millions that were geniuses and that's it
Also, "white" is not a race. The race is Caucasoid. You are obviously being blinded by modern cultural notions of complexion. Ask any other Anthropologist, skin, hair, and eye color are the least reliably indicators of race. If you look at the main indicators: skull shape, hair texture, teeth, body type, muscle fibers, etc, you'd find that Europeans -- Northern and Southern -- are not much different than other Caucasoids like Arabs, Persians, Jews, Indians, Berbers, and so forth.
@IAmSoRich race is a social construct....Caucasoid refers to a skull shape...the Nazis for instance considered Eastern Europeans to be subhuman or untermensch and not white
Native Americans and Eskimos have mongoloid shaped skulls but are not considered East Asian and have strong differences in IQ from East Asians
Face it this whole racist DNA IQ thing is just a lie...even studies with identical twins (who have the same DNA) show that their IQs can vary by as much as 24 points
it would seem you suffer from both ignorance and an inferiority complex. you whole argument is based solely on the desire to prove without any evidence that greeks can't be white, because they're tanner then, say, a swede. as if it wasn't enough to make such a statement steeped in envy and ignorance, you have to provide wholly irrelevant information from your favourite "linguistic professors" to debate what race greeks belong to. pure childish racist jealousy. read up on genetics a bit.
@romanpr1nce dispute what fact? What I said was if you consider the Greeks to be white, then why not Arabs or Indians? How is a non-Greek white claiming the contributions of the Greeks different from Arabs or Indians claiming their contributions?
You only threw ad hominems and refuted absolutely nothing that I said in desperation
What irrelevant information? It's basic history that Northern Europeans had no writing, you can double check it up, look it up, or ask ANY historian if you want
@UnnaturallyNatural because greeks are genetically white. they are in every way considered by someone who studies dna, white.
the fact that you feel angry about this in your small offended 11 year old indian mind, is because you're sadly jealous and angry. it''s really obvious.
:( stop being so jealous and angry of people's civilizations. i'm sure your civilization did a few good things. not many but a few...
@romanpr1nce what a fuckin loser I didn't say Greeks weren't "white" you idiot...I said if you consider Greeks to be "white" then you should also consider Arabs and Indians to be white and non-Greek whites claiming the contributions of the Greeks would be nearly the same as an Arab or Indian claiming the contributions of the Greeks
Learn to read next time
I feel bad for defeating the dumb Europeans too easily
@romanpr1nce lol you're just a non-Greek white loser trying to claim that you have something to do with the contributions of the ancient Greeks like a typical white\racist
All you can do is throw lame ad hominems and break down in desperation
@UnnaturallyNatural lol you're just another non-white loser trying to claim achievements made by the white race. and the fact that you are reveals what would appear to be an insecurity you have. it's quite funny actually. you deny greeks are white because you don't want the list of the accomplishments of the white race to be any longer than it already is. so you'll deny genetic data to support your theory. that's fine if it protects your sensibilities and your view of the world.
@romanpr1nce lol still trapped in denial I already refuted every single statement you made easily...you haven't refuted even ONE statement I made all your responses just say "Greeks were white, and I'm white and even though I'm not Greek I can claim the contributions of the Greeks"
I never said Greeks weren't white it's another straw man argument used, "white" is a social construct
It's just as stupid as an Arab claiming the contributions of the Greeks, are you as smart as Archimedes BTW?
@UnnaturallyNatural the only one trapped in denial is you. you need greeks to be non-white so you feel better about being non-white yourself. it's sad really. and as for not refuting even ONE statement that you've made, none of your statements are worth refuting. you put forth no evidence to support your uneducated world view other then "greeks aren't white." but if denying genetic evidence makes you feel better for being what ever race you are, then fine.
@romanpr1nce lol in other words you're thinking in your mind "I've lost the debate, I'm in desperation, I can't refute any statement, so I'll just throw some argument ad hominems to make it seem like I refuted something, just keep repeatedly saying "you need Greeks to be non-white" even though he didn't claim Greeks were non-white, yeah that's a good lame strategy"
The simple fact is my statements remain unrefuted, an Arab claiming the contributions of the Greeks is just like a non-Greek white
@UnnaturallyNatural there was never any debate here. you know in order to have a debate you have to present your case with evidence, not just say "your pathetic" "IQ means nothing" "greeks aren't white they're tan" and other such repetitions of the same baseless, desperate mantra.
"Arab claiming the contributions of the Greeks is just like a non-Greek white"
is that what you are? an arab? well it makes sense your so afraid of white accomplishment. keep living in denial.
@romanpr1nce lol instead of refuting a statement I made you just built up straw man (you can look up what that means if want)
None of these dumb whites refuted even one statement I made, obviously don't understand what the scientific method is, a control variable, or Occam's razor
But I guess it's their fault just been brainwashed into pro-white history
@UnnaturallyNatural despite how proud you are of saying "straw man," it's not actually a big word. sorry. your starting to sound like a 12 year old and your lack of vocabulary is beginning to back that up.
nobodies denying argument, you don't have one. the only one in denial is you. of IQ, genetics, and really common knowledge.
by the way, occam's razor does not apply to how your using it in any way. i don't think you know what it is.
again, if you think history is pro-white, then ok.
@UnnaturallyNatural you seem to hate whites, party because of a severe inferiority complex. god i wonder how that happened...
anyway your statements do not support fact. yet you deny IQ as a means of measuring intellect, deny migration and genetic origin of greeks, and seem to think whites are stealing another races untapped into accomplishment. it's quite delusional.
and yes occam's razor does not apply. by the way, occam was white so... i don't know why you'd use a white man's law. lol
@romanpr1nce nah I like whites they are nice people but usually dumb and misinformed
I already proved you wrong so many times using studies from peer-reviewed journals, you haven't refuted even one statement I made, all you do is create straw man like "you deny IQ" or "think whites are stealing another races", I never made such statements, so it's a straw man
You said Occam's razor doesn't apply but didn't explain how
Greeks are haplogroup J2 and E1b1b GET OVER IT STOP LIVING IN DENIAL
1) The DNA make-up of today’s Greeks is 99.5% white. The study cliams that today’s Greek has 99.5% the same DNA make-up as as the white Greeks of ancient times.
2) Greek DNA has not been influenced, nor altered, by the mixture of Slavic or Turkish DNA, even though Ottomans ruled a large part of Greece for 400 years.
3) Out of a sample of 925 modern-day Greek DNA, only 0.4% exhibited non-white DNA.
@romanpr1nce lol.....which peer-reviewed source says this? Basically EVERY source says most Greeks and haplogroup J2 or E1b1b (previously known as E3b)
Stop living in denial just brainwashed into White Nationalist fake science
Where did you get your facts from the White Nationalist Stormfront forum? Seriously anyone can double-check what I said if they want
@UnnaturallyNatural despite what you wish to believe about greek genetic origin, studies from both stanford university and by pavia university, two of the most highly respected peer reviewed study you can find, have proven 99 percent of greeks today are more than99.5% white. they are THE most pure people in europe. that makes them THE most white people on the planet. not only that, skull shape and dna testing shows they haven't changed since ancient times. the majority of studies don't lie.
@romanpr1nce LOL!!! The problem is I never denied that Greeks were white dumb ass, since genetically Arabs and Indians are included as white. What I said was they had nothing to do with the Northern and Eastern and other European civilizations fool.
The most common Greek haplogroups are much more similar to Arabs than Northern and Western Europeans dumb ass.
The ancient Greek writers like Aristotle described their skin as medium tone and darker than the pale barbarians up North. Face the facts
@leedaomillz Actually they're not considered Asian by geneticists....any geneticists who looks at Arab, Indian, and European DNA sees that they're all similar
@UnnaturallyNatural the fact that you live in such denial about racial reality, the IQ difference among races, IQ as a measure of intellect itself, genetic study after genetic study of greeks, skull analysis of greeks as well as historic migration and classification, and even basic common knowledge leads me to believe your denial is more based on an inferiority complex.
why are the majority of scientific breakthroughs made by white people? well, i'll leave you to make up your own reasons.
@romanpr1nce except that I never said IQ wasn't a measure of intellect or denied any genetic study you just keep making up straw man....IQ measures convergent thinking fairly well
The majority of discoveries are made by whites now because whites developed a culture to conquer which created a need for better technology and machines...that's why in the past whites weren't making discoveries...European related countries did NOT have the highest GDP for most of history
@UnnaturallyNatural intellegent people generally have high IQ's. unintellegent people generally have low IQ's. when an entire race of people has a much higher average IQ then another race of people, what does using that brain of yours tell you? i'm sorry it's hard to confront things like that so i'll deal with your previous struggle with the fact that greeks are white. not enough characters to write in one comment i'm afraid.
@romanpr1nce It depends on the variables dumb ass. I'm pretty sure that the ancient Northern and Eastern Europeans did not have high IQs and the ancient Nubians had much higher IQs. Nubians also developed weapons when they tried to conquer and were known as the best archers according to the Egyptians.
Just like I said, economies change from time to time. IQ is obviously not purely genetic if identical twins (who are the closest possible genetically) can have IQs varying by 24 points.
@UnnaturallyNatural sub-saharan africa has an average iq of 70, many places in africa have averages as low as 60. they're iq's are closer to dogs then to europeans.
african americans who have as much as 40-60% european dna have iq's of 80.
so your little theories aren't really based on history or fact.
@romanpr1nce IQ is a function of nutrition & culture not DNA & african americans do not have 40-60% european dna! Im of african descent & im in the top 10% As far as IQ go 145 & the nubians are the egyptians!
@yahshuah29 oh that's hilarious. IQ (intelligence quotient) is not selective by race. it measures basic cognitive ability. if you have a low IQ, you may be mentally retarded, or stupid. but keep telling yourself that.
@romanpr1nce Well obviously Africans with no education suffering from malnutrition and other things would not have high IQ scores.
You're just in denial the hypothesis that "IQ is mostly genetic" can be tested with Identical Twins....how can it be possible for Identical Twins who have the exact same DNA to have IQs differing by 24 points if IQ is genetic? We know that hair color is genetic so identical twins have the same natural hair color, but for IQ it doesn't work out the same.
@UnnaturallyNatural i know whites scare you, i know it's easy for you to copy paste the same repetitious arguments over and over again, i know you deny IQ as a measure of intellect, i know you deny genetics, i know you deny europeans that frighten your view of the world, but it's easier just to take a big breath and just be happy for who you are. not try to claim other people's accomplishments. i know its hard but you should try.
@romanpr1nce lol just more false straw man....can you point where I "denied" genetics, IQ, or anything like that?
I've been pointing out studies, using the scientific method, logic, and reasoning, but I don't expect these dumb whites to know what that is, they probably have a hard time understanding what Occam's razor is or what a control variable is
@UnnaturallyNatural you denied IQ as a measure of intellect, you deny the genetic origin of greeks because it doesn't fit your view of the world, you deny any basic historic fact because you think history is "pro-white." perhaps it is, maybe that's why it's so hard for you to accept it. perhapse dna is pro-white too. perhaps science is racist because you can't seem to grasp that either.
@romanpr1nce lol....where did I state that? It's just another straw man I can explain it slowly to you if you don't understand the argument like a dumb white\racist
Lol these dumb white people are just gullible, don't use science or logic, just an argument from personal incredulity
As for Greeks genetically, they are mostly haplogroup J2 and E1b1b which is Mediterranean and Arab found high frequencies in Iraq, Northern and Eastern Africa...but low in Northern and Western Europe
hey look I'm a typical white\racist person "I'm not Greek, my ancestors aren't Greek but I have to try to claim that I have something to do with the achievements and contributions of Greeks even though I'm not Greek. I have to try to make it seem like whites invented everything since I feel inferior and subhuman that Northern, Western, and Eastern Europeans achieved so little in ancient times"
It's only been in relatively recent times that Northern Europeans finally came out from the stone age
@PJYHace yeah it's sick when someone easily wins against any white person
They cannot explain how since whites had nearly the same DNA in the past why they were so unusually unintelligent for such a long time period
It is obviously just a big lie from DNA racists....the reason why whites appeared "smart" is because they had the culture to conquer, and from the culture to conquer and rule the need for better weapons arises...this is the only reason
Most of the prominent figures in Ancient Greece and Rome were light complexioned. Alexander the Great, Achilles, Menelaus, Nero, Augustus, Julius Caesar, Caligula, etc were all described as having features no different from modern Northern Europeans (ie light skin, hair, and/or eyes). Also, the earliest civilizations arose due to environmental factors, around major river basins. Europe has no equivalent of the Nile, Tigris and Euphrates, Indus, or Yellow rivers.
@IAmSoRich really is that so? Being described as light-skinned vs pale-skinned are two separate things fool. The Greeks particularly hated pale skin. There are many rivers in Europe you're just making up lame excuses as to why Europeans in the past weren't nearly as "smart".
These dumb Europeans have absolutely no explanation as to why the so "smart" Europeans weren't smart in the past
Do you think it is a coincidence that all of the first civilizations started around these areas with large rivers? From these places, civilization spread. So naturally, Greece and Rome, closest to the great rivers adopted civilized society before Northern Europeans, who were relatively isolated. When Northern Europeans were introduced, they pretty much took the torch and ran with it. You should probably learn some Anthropology, you showing yourself to be quite ignorant.
took the torch and ran with it? Yeah since after the 17th Century Europe finally got a good economy finally having a good economy for 300 years out of 20,0000 is what you call "taking the torch and running with it"?
European economies are already starting to fall. How unimpressive. If the genetic interpretation is correct why weren't Northern Europeans smart in the past?
The Watson and Crick version always overshadows the work of Rosalind Franklin. As a woman this upsets me tremendously, and as a friend of many cancer survivors shame on the Nobel Laureate program for using this as an excuse to overlook her achievements.
greeks were white, romans were white, franks were white, germans were white, spaniards were white, saxons and normans were white, and their accomplishment are theirs, not yours. nor are the egyptians. sorry fact is fact, don't hide from it; embrace fact and reality and you will evolve as a person.
"Researchers have concluded that a significant number of modern Europeans can trace their ancestry to Arabs who immigrated to the continent thousands of years ago." writes tamim. "Dr. Lounes Chikhi
The spread of the Middle Eastern genes within Europe is not uniform. While an individual in Greece and the Balkans has between 70-100% of Arab genes, people in France and Germany have 15-30%. People in western France and England have as little as 10% of these genes.
@UnnaturallyNatural White people are their own race. We evolved from a common ancestor. Nobody denies on some level we all share similar genes. You know nothing about genetics do you? lol
@romanpr1nce lol....if you consider Greeks to be "white" then you should also consider Arabs and Indians to be white...since genetically Arabs, Indians, and "whites" are all very similar and all have Caucasoid shaped skulls
you don't know anything about genetics do you? just trapped in denial
afro-centrists are very good at twisting history so much they contradict all logic and historic, archeological, genetic, or scientific fact. twisting the laws of reality, history, and sanity to fit their desire to feel important.
they're also very vocal with their lack of knowledge as to be parodies of themselves.
Sub Saharan Africa has produced very early instances of carbon steel found to be in production around 2000 years before present in northwest Tanzania, based on complex preheating principles. These discoveries, according to Schmidt and Avery (archaeologists credited with the discovery) are significant for the history of metallurgy
Sub Saharan Africa has produced very early instances of carbon steel found to be in production around 2000 years before present in northwest Tanzania, based on complex preheating principles. These discoveries, according to Schmidt and Avery (archaeologists credited with the discovery) are significant for the history of metallurgy
We live in a world where your ethnic identity does not necessarily match with your cultural one. As such all this division on race is a red herring and a nonsense and James Watson absolutely was right to have been sacked for beeing so loose and racist with his implications considering his position. He has been made to look so stupid because his comments were not based on any scientific fact. Shame.. now look at the idiots black people have to deal with
They had great cultural technological advance that was brought to them from the Vedas, at that time was when the hindus valley civilization as well as many cultures in mesoamerica were fully trading with them also. The problem was that after that the great flood changed human history.
I should say that i'm not racist at all but if you are African you will try to believe that your ancestors built the pyramids the same if you were white etc, and that's not the point. I'm not a hindu but I give them credit because in all my research i've done shows that Sumerians had a cultural base from India and after that they expanded throughout the middle east.
The Indians knew a more sophisticated system of astronomy that even today is not fully known to actual astronomers, as well did the Mayans(there's a difference between Mayans, Toltecs and Incas(different cultures)). There's much proof about that in the Vedic scriptures and way before the supposed Aryan invasion myth?
From Africa? Well I suppose you try to discredit the Indians for their accomplishments and that's nothing new to me. If you really think the origins of mankind all come from Africa you are wrong and you injuring your mind.
i love the myth that people use in saying the greeks got some of their information from india. the ancient indians believed the world was a plate on top of a turtle, with a giant snake wrapped around that. the greek philosophers and mathematicians had the scientific method, not mysticism.
@romanpr1nce lol....anyone who really believes that Indians believed the world was a plate on top of a turtle is either misinformed or an idiot....Isaac Newton, Nikola Tesla, and Robert Oppenheimer were all interested in and influenced by Indian philosophy
The Upanishads and other Indian scriptures is > than all of primitive Greek mountain gods nonsense
The Greek philosophers Pythagoras, Arrian, Apollonius, and others all traveled to India and were influenced by India
@romanpr1nce Ancient Greeks called Northern Europeans pale barbarians and viewed Nubians, Egyptians, Indians, and basically everyone as higher than a pale barbarian
Greek writing also comes from the Arabs, Greeks are likely Arab migrants, Arabs started Greek civilization
BTW Indian religions are the only ones that mention multiple universes and atoms
@UnnaturallyNatural no your referring to a quote form an ancient greek philosopher who wrote the greek skin tone was superior to the inferior "burned face people of the south" and the "pale skin" of the north. that theirs was fair but not too pale
greek writings came from greeks, arabs burned down the library of alexandria and stole greek writings
your revising history to fit your anti-white point of view but you fool only yourself.
i know your insecure but really your lack of knowledge is sad
Well it seems that you believe they used their highly advanced abacus, when the truth is that Sumerians the earliest known civilization for Westerners got most of their knowledge from ancient India.
ADNmt/cromosoma Y patrones migratorios: nórdicos vikingos/ esclavas irlandesas, conquistadores españoles (europeos) / colombianas. Si asquenazis son geneticamente hablando indistinguibles de los palestinos (de oriente medio y descendientes de Abraham) A los españoles en latinoaméricas los llaman "gallegos" ¿eran españoles mezcla d moros y hebreos sefardies cuando llegaron a Colombia?¿lo son ahora?
Se puede forzar coito ¿y la gestación + cuidados para hijo d emigo violento?
TocinazoXXL 1 week ago
It obviously makes it even more funnier when one of the most smartest and innovative in his field is 16% African. Who he claimed those people were inferior and less intelligent.
Nor James Watson could never significantly prove such a claim, he only said it out of terms dealing with the fact he grew up in segregated and racial times.
davidcici11 3 weeks ago
@lictor313 You white people are demons from the pits of hell.
adz09ish 3 weeks ago
White people are demons from the pits of hell
adz09ish 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
blattdanielmain 1 week ago
@adz09ish You are an absolute idiot. Thank you, have a nice day!
blattdanielmain 1 week ago
African-Americans have innovated field of technology and if you knew anything about African-American inventors or some like Dr. Ben Carson and other's realize most of things we use to today was invented by a black man. I don't use that whole stupid unjust scheme that whites are naturally smarter. It's not true, no one is naturally smarter than someone when it comes to race.
Race is a social construct it doesn't exist. their is no race gene for intelligence or for inferiority can you show me?
davidcici11 3 weeks ago
@davidcici11 "most of things we use to today was invented by a black man" You only discredit yourself with your delusional claims.
krnpowr 2 weeks ago
Thumbs down for the blaring TED jingle!
eswyatt 3 weeks ago
White people are naturally evil
adz09ish 1 month ago
@adz09ish dont make crap up
FIGHTFANNERD3 3 weeks ago
Rosalind Franklin.
TheGerogero 1 month ago
@TheGerogero Had a good start.
Preeminence21 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
does anyone know a website or link that has his speech written?
MrPEDOCTOR 2 months ago
Racist devil I hope you burn in hell.
adz09ish 3 months ago
@adz09ish who?
GodOfUnbelief 2 months ago
@adz09ish you think Watson should die and "burn in hell" because he used words and qualified his opinion of subsaharan africans..
people like you... unhinged egalitarian, steeped in religion... should be incarcerated... or forced to live in the Congo
lictor313 1 month ago
@adz09ish lol
FIGHTFANNERD3 3 weeks ago
laugh at 8:14
MrDoublet1998 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrDoublet1998 3 months ago
The irony being that he has16% more black DNA than the average white. He must really curse at himself every time he looks at the mirror. I can only imagine God sitting in the heavens laughing at Watson and saying, " Gotcha, you got got."
Shortyjored88 4 months ago
@Shortyjored88 Did you even watch the video, or did you just come here to ridicule the man? He has a PhD in Genetics, deduced the double helix structure of DNA, has made significant contributions to cancer research, plus gained countless other achievements throughout his life. What do you have, and what have you done? Don't be so quick to judge someone.
TheSiqLad 4 months ago
@TheSiqLad I could also ask you that question? What does it matter that he is a genetics? How many of us in this forum would be a genetics? Not everyone is born to be scientist, it doesn't mean that I am any less accomplished. I'm not attacking him for his accomplishment, but rather for making claims about a group of people without backing it up. The irony being that the blood of those he has belittle is running through his veins. Even his fellow scientist don't agree with his claims.
Shortyjored88 4 months ago
@Shortyjored88 Valid question sir. My mother studied an MBA at Harvard. She didn't come from money, and as a young person was often ridiculed because of her culture heritage. She raised me as a single parent. I was born in the U.S. and moved to Australia when I was 12, and hold triple citizenship. At H.S. undertook the International Baccalaureate Diploma, and have a B.A. in Media and Communications majoring in Government and International Relations, Marketing, with a minor in Cultural Studies.
TheSiqLad 4 months ago
@Shortyjored88 I would refer you to this video which is right on this page: /watch?v=aequ-goKOBE&feature=related. Please understand I am not trying to be spiteful, but when you make a comment about a man cursing himself, just because you don't agree with him, you're going to get challenged.
TheSiqLad 4 months ago
@TheSiqLad I don't care if he won a nobel peace prize after piggy backing from another scientist accomplishment; my problem isn't based on what he accomplished; it should not make anyone immune to criticism especially when they are wrong. He even knows he was wrong, this is why he had to save face and apologize after he realized his fellow scientist dubbed his study as inaccurate. He should be grateful for his black ancestors, he needed their DNA to exist no matter how dumb he thinks they are.
Shortyjored88 4 months ago
@Shortyjored88 The claim I believe you are referring too is one he made about Africa as a geographical location, not race. In my experience, on average Africans are not as capable as non-Africans (ie Asians, Indians, Europeans) with issues requiring a high level of intellect. That not to say that all people of African heritage are dumb, of course not. I have met many black people who would make many white people look like fools. It simply is a statement based on observations taken 'as a whole'.
TheSiqLad 4 months ago
@Shortyjored88 that's actually a hit piece by Steve Sailor... its not true at all. You "got got" by the mainstream media ...
lictor313 1 month ago
oh look, 12 Niggers gave thumbs down...
hayden50 5 months ago
@hayden50 lol? Where is your point white hat?
TacticalShinobi 5 months ago
Comment removed
hayden50 5 months ago
LOL the University of Chicago lets you in after 2 years in high school.
zeryic 6 months ago 2
i love you sir
prasangith2 6 months ago
Thanks TED for the great Lecture :)
AbdulAziz4CaNaDa 6 months ago
Who are the 12 who disliked this :S ! i bet they didn't even watch it !
ninooney100 6 months ago
does anyone know a website or link that has his speech written?
shakergeorge 6 months ago
Respond to this video...
AbdulAziz4CaNaDa 6 months ago
@shakergeorge Wow I found it, because I was looking for it too lol.
Bro I can't type it here, I don't know why, but I will send it to your inbox. O.k.....
AbdulAziz4CaNaDa 6 months ago
ted.com/talks/lang/eng/james_watson_on_how_he_discovered_dna.html
AbdulAziz4CaNaDa 6 months ago
@AbdulAziz4CaNaDa thanks man...are you goin to bergen catholic?
shakergeorge 6 months ago
@shakergeorge You welcome. haha NO. Good luck
AbdulAziz4CaNaDa 6 months ago
@AbdulAziz4CaNaDa wait it's not working
shakergeorge 6 months ago
In programming the program will work when only 80% of the code is correct. Microsofts rule, if it's 80% it's good. : ) A former programming major, now a physics major
truthseeker010101 7 months ago
I am not the brightest person in the room, I was in Earth Science today and had many questions. I voiced the question and the professor said "I don't have an answer to your question, but I like your hypothesis". Hopefully I myself will earn my Ph. D. and help to add a piece of knowledge to the puzzle. One Love weather a believer in a Creator or not, I love you, and I love science.
truthseeker010101 7 months ago
He was right and brave to speak about IQ differences.
Gonzoidzz 7 months ago
@Gonzoidzz His general statement was correct, but failed to provide a link.
It was only a hypothesis - like it or not - it will stay a hypothesis.
NewOrleansboii 5 months ago
Barbados has an IQ of 78 and Bahamas has an IQ of 80. Both are countries with a good education system and GDP PC.
the0th 8 months ago
@the0th indeed
FIGHTFANNERD3 3 weeks ago
I think Plato was aware of DNA...check out my vid
PlatoDNA 9 months ago
Well first of all, Charles Darwin didn't prove that life evolved... there's no proof of that whatsoever. If you think that it's true, then where are all the gradual transitional species today? Chimpanzees and man are 1.8% different genetically speaking (which is huge) and that is about 48 million nucleotides. Where's all the gradual transitions in between? Or birds and lizards for that matter?
Secondly, How is it that DNA molecules have these instructions? The DNA language is like a program
TheSmoonge 9 months ago
@TheSmoonge Extinct. DNA codes for proteins, different codes = different proteins.
EvieGyse 9 months ago
@EvieGyse different codes = different proteins does not explain how that would happen by chance however.
TheSmoonge 9 months ago
@TheSmoonge How what exactly would happen by chance?
EvieGyse 9 months ago
@TheSmoonge Creationists videos are on YouTube if you want to continuing believing in refuted arguments. Pro science channels are on YouTube as well, cdk077, DonExodus2, and AronRa are good places to start. If you like reading, pick up Why Evolution Is True. Simple and easy to understand.
HybridD91 6 months ago
@TheSmoonge *continue*
HybridD91 6 months ago
It sucks when he found out he was 18% of African admixture lol
davidcici11 9 months ago
@davidcici11 I know right! Since he is so smart can he perform one last great feat? Figure how the bloody he managed to overcome his 16/18% 'defect' he was previously unaware of to win the peace prize. Hmm.
Yanipooh 8 months ago
@davidcici11 most north americans have mixture in them but whites are still smarter then blacks
FIGHTFANNERD3 3 weeks ago
@FIGHTFANNERD3 That is a non-scientific assertion.There is no intelligence gene someone can inherit. There is no suprise whites score higher. Koreans score considerably less in Japan on IQ scores, but when they come to the United States they score higher than Japanese.
Does that mean Koreans are smarter than Japanese? Or ice versa. African migrants score higher than African-Americans on IQ scores, same with Mexican immigrants who score higher than Mexican-Americans. Can you explain this?
davidcici11 3 weeks ago
yes the brain is plastic you can change your intelligence blah blah blah with that said, people ARE genetically predisposed towards certain traits, and intelligence is one of them.
could a horse master calculus if it studied vigorously? could a frog learn shakespeare?
scuzzulus 10 months ago
It's amazing how many are making comments about the IQ-tests, the heredity of the g factor and genetics, although it's obvious that they don't have the slightest clue what they are talking about. How about taking the time and study the research that have been done, conclusions that have been made and what these are based on, before starting writing cocksure statements about the subject? You can't see how heredity can be judged by twin- and adoptionstudies? Well, how about reading them, then?
Unitedeurope1 11 months ago
lol einstein on youtube...with improper grammar.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
it's one huge conspiracy. its the evil white mans attempt to lower black IQ scores in every country, culture, and economic status they're introduced to throughout europe and the rest of the world. that must be it!
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce No there's no conspiracy you're just an idiot who refuses to look at actual studies and instead looks at pseudoscience, guessed IQ numbers, and White Nationalist propaganda. You just don't understand what a control variable is and try to use your own personal incredulity to determine things.
In controlled studies like Barbara Tizard's black children age 4-5 had IQs of 108, white children 103, and mixed children 106.
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural the only one refusing to look at studies is you. you can refuse statistics, IQ levels of the different races which are consistent regardless of country or social status, you can refuse any science, test score, or anything else and you will remain in denial.
but you can keep thinking it's just a conspiracy. black people can really fly it's just biased white studies which say they can't.
black people have lower IQs because they didn't need to evolve the same brains as whites.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce I question the validity of IQ test itself. This guy is a racist bigot!
TemplarX2 1 year ago
@TemplarX2 you can question the very concept of intelligence itself it won't change anything.
i got an F on my math quiz. MATH IS RACIST!
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce And a math test measure intelligence? How the fvck is it that I'm black and my IQ is 140-150, 80 pts above the supposed African IQ. And I'm nothing special just somebody who reads a lot and applies himself seriously. My father was rather sharp and skilled but not intellectual like my siblings. The difference between my IQ and that of my sibs is that I took education seriously, hence a higher IQ. I've always been first in white predominant classes. 1st not 2nd! This is all bullsh!t.
TemplarX2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TemplarX2 "And a math test measure intelligence? How the fvck is it that I'm black and my IQ is 140-150,"
i lol'd
regardless of how smart you think you are that doesn't change the incredibly low average of blacks. iq's which compare to mentally retarded europeans. "i have iq of a billion! i are smart"
i'm sorry if you think "IQ tests" are racist
and that tests and school grades are racist
and science and maths is racist toward blacks.
sad really. and no, intelligence is not "bullshit"
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@TemplarX2 Obviously not intelligent enough to fairly judge the intelligence of other people? So what if you are the smartest guy in yuor white class?
For a while (maybe still), the tallest guy in Basketball was from North Korea, which has the world's shortest people (Due to lack of food and being chinese).
What if the "tallest basketballer in the world" said: "How the fvck is it that I'm vietnamese and my height is 210cm, 80cm above the supposed vietnamese height, and I'm nothing special"?
noobenstein 11 months ago
@noobenstein I will believe when they fully understand intelligence and develop a more reliable method. IQ tests are not reliable! I believe in hard work and learning and that intelligence is more elastic than any other physical attribute. I'll give you just one example. Geeks are supposed to intelligent but they are socially awkward! Why is that? Because the area of the brain that helps to interpret others emotions and mannerism is under-trained. This is a serious intellectual deficiency!
TemplarX2 11 months ago
@noobenstein I don't really mean hard work but working smart or working efficiently, methodically. "Work hard" motto rather than the work smart one will only make you a peasant.
TemplarX2 11 months ago
He took Rosalind Franklin's Ideas. He would have never of got he double helix shape if Franklin haden't taken those close up pictures. He got fired from cambridge university for spying on franklin and wilkins ideas and attempting to make a model of DNA. It was a crappy model. Watson then snuck into rosalyn franklins DNA lecture and stole her ideas. Rosalind franklin was the true discoverer.
trailblazers52 1 year ago
HIS FINDING AS PART OF A GROUP OF PEOPLE ALTHOUGH INCREDIBLY PERTINENT TO THE MODERN WORLD ALSO LEAVES ME DISCOURAGED, BECAUSE I FEEL HE IS REVERED TOO MUCH AS SOME SAVIOUR OF THE MODERN SCIENTIFIC WORLD... HE IS NOT THAT, HE DUBIOUSLY DISCOVERED THE STRUCTRUE OF A MOLECULE ***NOTHING MORE*** HE IS NOT A BIOCHEMIST OR CELL BIOLOGIST HE IS A STRUCTURAL CHEMIST AND A LYING ONE PRONE TO GAFFES AT THAT. HE WAS SACKED FROM COLD SPRING HARBOUR FOR A VERY VERY GOOD REASON. STUPID MAN
Entanglement9 1 year ago
forming organs and new species ~it looks possible when subject the nucleotides/nitrogen bases in suitable nuclear reaction conditions and some media , it mean like in Urey-miller experiment the formation of amino acids take place after subjecting the water, methane ,ammonia , hydrogen to electric discharge .at the beginning of primordial earth ,nuclear substances present in the earth leaded to the mutations and genetic changes and hence rate of, evolution proportional to the nuclear reaction
uuuday2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Every organism- humans, plants, animals and etc. come from the same exact original cell. The theory was pronounced by Charles Darwin and accepted as a scientific document later on. Meaning..you have same DNA with every living thing in this world. The concept of karma yet solves another piece of a puzzle. Wishing others well, you get well. Wishing others evil, you get evil. What one critics in others, those are his precise flaws..How one sees the world, that is exactly how one sees himself..
RUSSKAYAG 1 year ago
i just enjoy watsons eyebrows and witty humor
luvstogizxxxsmokewee 1 year ago
you can rely on your propaganda and anti-white fervor to fix a more pleasing view of the world for yourself. you're more then welcome to.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
Well I'm the winner of this debate as usual....anyone can double-check any statement I made here....most Greeks are haplogroup J2 and E1b1b according to every peer-reviewed source
"Paleolithic Y-haplogroup heritage predominates in a Cretan highland plateau," European Journal of Human Genetics (2007) 15, 485–493, Cariolou et al. 1998
Southern Europeans like Greeks and Italians seem to have little genetic connection to Northern, Western, and Eastern Europeans
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
"The mean absolute difference between twins is 6.60 (SD=5.20), the largest difference being 24 IQ points. The frequency of large twin differences is no more than would be expected from the normal probability curve." - Identical Twins Reared Apart, Arthur Jensen
Identical twins have the exact same DNA. In order to show that different groups of people have different IQs you have to isolate the variables influencing IQ so that the conclusion doesn't violate Occam's razor
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
lol these dumb Europeans don't know what science even is....whenever confronted with science, logic, and reasoning instead of attempting to refute a statement all they do is say "political correctness" even though no one is using political correctness, just science and logic
If someone provides IQ data of different people, in different education systems, different countries, different health, different wealth, different study habits, and says "OMG their IQs are different" that is not surprising
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural you seem to be in denial with genetics. if you knew anything about genetics you'd know greeks are a mix of nordic/doric. they're indo-european and if you knew anything about the "white" race, you'd know "white" is not a race. as far as genetics go, they show that greeks migrated from northern europe many thousands of years ago. im sorry you can't accept them as white, it hurts you for some reason. but whites don't need to claim greatness, only you do.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural europeans invented science. they know it well.
Hitlerrrchan 1 year ago
@Hitlerrrchan Actually not, the Arab Alhazen invented the scientific method....just goes to show how uneducated and misinformed these dumb Europeans are
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
He wrote "Avoid Boring People". ASTOUNDING, isn't it? I guess he stripped his house of all mirrors.
This looks VERY BAD, worse than I'd expected.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lets cum within naughty boys benaughtyman.info
dinesikakonara 1 year ago
"race is a social construct"
-UnnaturallyNatural
lol
dog breeds are a social construct.
labradors are the same as pit bulls.
don't agree? RACIST!
Hitlerrrchan 1 year ago
@Hitlerrrchan yes dog breeds are also a social construct.....that's why even though Eskimos and Native Americans are genetically East Asian they're not viewed as East Asian because race is a social construct...and they also have very different IQs
I didn't say all groups of people are the same
James Watson and Richard Lynn are just dumb liberal atheist trying to spread their liberal racist propaganda
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural or they're scientists who speak a very basic truth. a truth which most people know in the back of their heads but shut it off. you know there are not only differences in IQ between the different races, but that there are some races more prone to violence. you know this but you vehemently deny this to yourself. you can believe what ever liberal fantasies you want, but in the end you'll always know.
Hitlerrrchan 1 year ago
@Hitlerrrchan except that James D. Watson and Richard Lynn are both LIBERAL atheists fool
You're just trapped in denial and don't even understand what science even is just like a typical gullible white\racist
Do you know what a control variable is?
If you wanted to irrefutably show some group as having higher IQs what would you need to do is get the same education system, same study habits, same wealth level, same level of education, and then test IQs of different groups fool
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural you sound very defensive. but when a race of people have a consistently lower IQ, it tends to mean they're not as intelligent. and european achievement clearly defines european minds. it clearly defines your fear of them as well. sorry it makes you uncomfortable to bring up such subjects. they appear to effect you emotionally. you don't have to accept them as fact of course, you seem well versed in ignoring history, genetics, logic, and common sense.
Hitlerrrchan 1 year ago
@Hitlerrrchan lol....where as European achievement prior to the 13th Century?
You're obviously in denial and desperation, refusing to use science or logic
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
This is a sickening, old, sniveling, eugenicist, slime ball. Disgusting.
donpengin 1 year ago
@donpengin
Your probably a dumb black person, get of the library computer and go back to the "hood"
leedaomillz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@leedaomillz I am white and you are a jackass.
donpengin 9 months ago
Can someone elaborate on the left-handed gene thing? Does it mean that those who are right handed are really ambidextrous and are just used to writing with the right hand? I know a friend who writes& does the usual stuff with his right but eats with a spoon or whatever with his left.
LucentTwinkle 1 year ago
... Plant & animals are sparse in the cold, so one has to plan & be more creative with what's there. In warm environments, food is abundant, clothing is not mandatory, & life is not mentally stimulating. This is why Eskimos have higher IQs than other Natives, as well as why Europeans & Orientals are the two groups with the highest IQs. So they may have started off poor due to the Ice Age, but when they adopted the right techniques, they put their better evolved brain to work & thrived
IAmSoRich 1 year ago
From my experience studying IQ and cultural contributions it seems people of Northern latitudes like Europeans, Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans are smarter. You have to remember that these people evolved in an Ice Age, and were only just coming out of one 10,000 when Agriculture began. Thus, they had a later start. But in the process, the cold environment improved their brain a lot more than tropical populations. It's much more intellectually demanding to live in cold climates than hot ones
IAmSoRich 1 year ago
@IAmSoRich the climate theory is just racist nonsense. How do you distinguish colder climates making people less intelligent from hotter climates making people less intelligent? Surviving in desert like conditions is demanding just like surviving in cold conditions
Lots of geniuses were from areas that had hot climates
There's really only been a few Europeans out of hundreds of millions that were geniuses and that's it
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
Also, "white" is not a race. The race is Caucasoid. You are obviously being blinded by modern cultural notions of complexion. Ask any other Anthropologist, skin, hair, and eye color are the least reliably indicators of race. If you look at the main indicators: skull shape, hair texture, teeth, body type, muscle fibers, etc, you'd find that Europeans -- Northern and Southern -- are not much different than other Caucasoids like Arabs, Persians, Jews, Indians, Berbers, and so forth.
IAmSoRich 1 year ago
@IAmSoRich race is a social construct....Caucasoid refers to a skull shape...the Nazis for instance considered Eastern Europeans to be subhuman or untermensch and not white
Native Americans and Eskimos have mongoloid shaped skulls but are not considered East Asian and have strong differences in IQ from East Asians
Face it this whole racist DNA IQ thing is just a lie...even studies with identical twins (who have the same DNA) show that their IQs can vary by as much as 24 points
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
it would seem you suffer from both ignorance and an inferiority complex. you whole argument is based solely on the desire to prove without any evidence that greeks can't be white, because they're tanner then, say, a swede. as if it wasn't enough to make such a statement steeped in envy and ignorance, you have to provide wholly irrelevant information from your favourite "linguistic professors" to debate what race greeks belong to. pure childish racist jealousy. read up on genetics a bit.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago 2
@romanpr1nce dispute what fact? What I said was if you consider the Greeks to be white, then why not Arabs or Indians? How is a non-Greek white claiming the contributions of the Greeks different from Arabs or Indians claiming their contributions?
You only threw ad hominems and refuted absolutely nothing that I said in desperation
What irrelevant information? It's basic history that Northern Europeans had no writing, you can double check it up, look it up, or ask ANY historian if you want
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural because greeks are genetically white. they are in every way considered by someone who studies dna, white.
the fact that you feel angry about this in your small offended 11 year old indian mind, is because you're sadly jealous and angry. it''s really obvious.
:( stop being so jealous and angry of people's civilizations. i'm sure your civilization did a few good things. not many but a few...
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce what a fuckin loser I didn't say Greeks weren't "white" you idiot...I said if you consider Greeks to be "white" then you should also consider Arabs and Indians to be white and non-Greek whites claiming the contributions of the Greeks would be nearly the same as an Arab or Indian claiming the contributions of the Greeks
Learn to read next time
I feel bad for defeating the dumb Europeans too easily
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol you're just a non-Greek white loser trying to claim that you have something to do with the contributions of the ancient Greeks like a typical white\racist
All you can do is throw lame ad hominems and break down in desperation
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural lol you're just another non-white loser trying to claim achievements made by the white race. and the fact that you are reveals what would appear to be an insecurity you have. it's quite funny actually. you deny greeks are white because you don't want the list of the accomplishments of the white race to be any longer than it already is. so you'll deny genetic data to support your theory. that's fine if it protects your sensibilities and your view of the world.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol still trapped in denial I already refuted every single statement you made easily...you haven't refuted even ONE statement I made all your responses just say "Greeks were white, and I'm white and even though I'm not Greek I can claim the contributions of the Greeks"
I never said Greeks weren't white it's another straw man argument used, "white" is a social construct
It's just as stupid as an Arab claiming the contributions of the Greeks, are you as smart as Archimedes BTW?
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural the only one trapped in denial is you. you need greeks to be non-white so you feel better about being non-white yourself. it's sad really. and as for not refuting even ONE statement that you've made, none of your statements are worth refuting. you put forth no evidence to support your uneducated world view other then "greeks aren't white." but if denying genetic evidence makes you feel better for being what ever race you are, then fine.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol in other words you're thinking in your mind "I've lost the debate, I'm in desperation, I can't refute any statement, so I'll just throw some argument ad hominems to make it seem like I refuted something, just keep repeatedly saying "you need Greeks to be non-white" even though he didn't claim Greeks were non-white, yeah that's a good lame strategy"
The simple fact is my statements remain unrefuted, an Arab claiming the contributions of the Greeks is just like a non-Greek white
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural there was never any debate here. you know in order to have a debate you have to present your case with evidence, not just say "your pathetic" "IQ means nothing" "greeks aren't white they're tan" and other such repetitions of the same baseless, desperate mantra.
"Arab claiming the contributions of the Greeks is just like a non-Greek white"
is that what you are? an arab? well it makes sense your so afraid of white accomplishment. keep living in denial.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol instead of refuting a statement I made you just built up straw man (you can look up what that means if want)
None of these dumb whites refuted even one statement I made, obviously don't understand what the scientific method is, a control variable, or Occam's razor
But I guess it's their fault just been brainwashed into pro-white history
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural despite how proud you are of saying "straw man," it's not actually a big word. sorry. your starting to sound like a 12 year old and your lack of vocabulary is beginning to back that up.
nobodies denying argument, you don't have one. the only one in denial is you. of IQ, genetics, and really common knowledge.
by the way, occam's razor does not apply to how your using it in any way. i don't think you know what it is.
again, if you think history is pro-white, then ok.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol didn't refute any statement I made, or use studies from peer-reviewed journals, or use logic or reasoning, just ad hominems
"If I say he's like a 12 year old some how that refutes a statement he made....checkmate!! I'm so smart and white"
Occam's razor doesn't apply, how? Thanks for proving how unusually dumb whites are
Don't even understand basic science or logic
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural you seem to hate whites, party because of a severe inferiority complex. god i wonder how that happened...
anyway your statements do not support fact. yet you deny IQ as a means of measuring intellect, deny migration and genetic origin of greeks, and seem to think whites are stealing another races untapped into accomplishment. it's quite delusional.
and yes occam's razor does not apply. by the way, occam was white so... i don't know why you'd use a white man's law. lol
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce nah I like whites they are nice people but usually dumb and misinformed
I already proved you wrong so many times using studies from peer-reviewed journals, you haven't refuted even one statement I made, all you do is create straw man like "you deny IQ" or "think whites are stealing another races", I never made such statements, so it's a straw man
You said Occam's razor doesn't apply but didn't explain how
Greeks are haplogroup J2 and E1b1b GET OVER IT STOP LIVING IN DENIAL
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural its sad you live in a world of denial.
1) The DNA make-up of today’s Greeks is 99.5% white. The study cliams that today’s Greek has 99.5% the same DNA make-up as as the white Greeks of ancient times.
2) Greek DNA has not been influenced, nor altered, by the mixture of Slavic or Turkish DNA, even though Ottomans ruled a large part of Greece for 400 years.
3) Out of a sample of 925 modern-day Greek DNA, only 0.4% exhibited non-white DNA.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol.....which peer-reviewed source says this? Basically EVERY source says most Greeks and haplogroup J2 or E1b1b (previously known as E3b)
Stop living in denial just brainwashed into White Nationalist fake science
Where did you get your facts from the White Nationalist Stormfront forum? Seriously anyone can double-check what I said if they want
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural despite what you wish to believe about greek genetic origin, studies from both stanford university and by pavia university, two of the most highly respected peer reviewed study you can find, have proven 99 percent of greeks today are more than99.5% white. they are THE most pure people in europe. that makes them THE most white people on the planet. not only that, skull shape and dna testing shows they haven't changed since ancient times. the majority of studies don't lie.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce LOL!!! The problem is I never denied that Greeks were white dumb ass, since genetically Arabs and Indians are included as white. What I said was they had nothing to do with the Northern and Eastern and other European civilizations fool.
The most common Greek haplogroups are much more similar to Arabs than Northern and Western Europeans dumb ass.
The ancient Greek writers like Aristotle described their skin as medium tone and darker than the pale barbarians up North. Face the facts
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural
actually Arabs and Indians are considered Asian by race.
leedaomillz 1 year ago
@leedaomillz Actually they're not considered Asian by geneticists....any geneticists who looks at Arab, Indian, and European DNA sees that they're all similar
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural the fact that you live in such denial about racial reality, the IQ difference among races, IQ as a measure of intellect itself, genetic study after genetic study of greeks, skull analysis of greeks as well as historic migration and classification, and even basic common knowledge leads me to believe your denial is more based on an inferiority complex.
why are the majority of scientific breakthroughs made by white people? well, i'll leave you to make up your own reasons.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce except that I never said IQ wasn't a measure of intellect or denied any genetic study you just keep making up straw man....IQ measures convergent thinking fairly well
The majority of discoveries are made by whites now because whites developed a culture to conquer which created a need for better technology and machines...that's why in the past whites weren't making discoveries...European related countries did NOT have the highest GDP for most of history
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural intellegent people generally have high IQ's. unintellegent people generally have low IQ's. when an entire race of people has a much higher average IQ then another race of people, what does using that brain of yours tell you? i'm sorry it's hard to confront things like that so i'll deal with your previous struggle with the fact that greeks are white. not enough characters to write in one comment i'm afraid.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce It depends on the variables dumb ass. I'm pretty sure that the ancient Northern and Eastern Europeans did not have high IQs and the ancient Nubians had much higher IQs. Nubians also developed weapons when they tried to conquer and were known as the best archers according to the Egyptians.
Just like I said, economies change from time to time. IQ is obviously not purely genetic if identical twins (who are the closest possible genetically) can have IQs varying by 24 points.
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural sub-saharan africa has an average iq of 70, many places in africa have averages as low as 60. they're iq's are closer to dogs then to europeans.
african americans who have as much as 40-60% european dna have iq's of 80.
so your little theories aren't really based on history or fact.
it's called denial.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce IQ is a function of nutrition & culture not DNA & african americans do not have 40-60% european dna! Im of african descent & im in the top 10% As far as IQ go 145 & the nubians are the egyptians!
yahshuah29 1 year ago
@yahshuah29 oh that's hilarious. IQ (intelligence quotient) is not selective by race. it measures basic cognitive ability. if you have a low IQ, you may be mentally retarded, or stupid. but keep telling yourself that.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce ZZZzzzzzzzzzzz!
yahshuah29 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce Well obviously Africans with no education suffering from malnutrition and other things would not have high IQ scores.
You're just in denial the hypothesis that "IQ is mostly genetic" can be tested with Identical Twins....how can it be possible for Identical Twins who have the exact same DNA to have IQs differing by 24 points if IQ is genetic? We know that hair color is genetic so identical twins have the same natural hair color, but for IQ it doesn't work out the same.
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural i know whites scare you, i know it's easy for you to copy paste the same repetitious arguments over and over again, i know you deny IQ as a measure of intellect, i know you deny genetics, i know you deny europeans that frighten your view of the world, but it's easier just to take a big breath and just be happy for who you are. not try to claim other people's accomplishments. i know its hard but you should try.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol just more false straw man....can you point where I "denied" genetics, IQ, or anything like that?
I've been pointing out studies, using the scientific method, logic, and reasoning, but I don't expect these dumb whites to know what that is, they probably have a hard time understanding what Occam's razor is or what a control variable is
Thanks for the laughs
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural you denied IQ as a measure of intellect, you deny the genetic origin of greeks because it doesn't fit your view of the world, you deny any basic historic fact because you think history is "pro-white." perhaps it is, maybe that's why it's so hard for you to accept it. perhapse dna is pro-white too. perhaps science is racist because you can't seem to grasp that either.
no thank you. :)
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol....where did I state that? It's just another straw man I can explain it slowly to you if you don't understand the argument like a dumb white\racist
Lol these dumb white people are just gullible, don't use science or logic, just an argument from personal incredulity
As for Greeks genetically, they are mostly haplogroup J2 and E1b1b which is Mediterranean and Arab found high frequencies in Iraq, Northern and Eastern Africa...but low in Northern and Western Europe
I win again
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
hey look I'm a typical white\racist person "I'm not Greek, my ancestors aren't Greek but I have to try to claim that I have something to do with the achievements and contributions of Greeks even though I'm not Greek. I have to try to make it seem like whites invented everything since I feel inferior and subhuman that Northern, Western, and Eastern Europeans achieved so little in ancient times"
It's only been in relatively recent times that Northern Europeans finally came out from the stone age
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural you are sick man the way you talk. if you want to argue about this go somewhere else instead of trolling around. ignorant bastard
PJYHace 1 year ago
Comment removed
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@PJYHace yeah it's sick when someone easily wins against any white person
They cannot explain how since whites had nearly the same DNA in the past why they were so unusually unintelligent for such a long time period
It is obviously just a big lie from DNA racists....the reason why whites appeared "smart" is because they had the culture to conquer, and from the culture to conquer and rule the need for better weapons arises...this is the only reason
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural
Most of the prominent figures in Ancient Greece and Rome were light complexioned. Alexander the Great, Achilles, Menelaus, Nero, Augustus, Julius Caesar, Caligula, etc were all described as having features no different from modern Northern Europeans (ie light skin, hair, and/or eyes). Also, the earliest civilizations arose due to environmental factors, around major river basins. Europe has no equivalent of the Nile, Tigris and Euphrates, Indus, or Yellow rivers.
IAmSoRich 1 year ago
@IAmSoRich really is that so? Being described as light-skinned vs pale-skinned are two separate things fool. The Greeks particularly hated pale skin. There are many rivers in Europe you're just making up lame excuses as to why Europeans in the past weren't nearly as "smart".
These dumb Europeans have absolutely no explanation as to why the so "smart" Europeans weren't smart in the past
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural
Do you think it is a coincidence that all of the first civilizations started around these areas with large rivers? From these places, civilization spread. So naturally, Greece and Rome, closest to the great rivers adopted civilized society before Northern Europeans, who were relatively isolated. When Northern Europeans were introduced, they pretty much took the torch and ran with it. You should probably learn some Anthropology, you showing yourself to be quite ignorant.
IAmSoRich 1 year ago
@IAmSoRich lol the only one quite ignorant is you
took the torch and ran with it? Yeah since after the 17th Century Europe finally got a good economy finally having a good economy for 300 years out of 20,0000 is what you call "taking the torch and running with it"?
European economies are already starting to fall. How unimpressive. If the genetic interpretation is correct why weren't Northern Europeans smart in the past?
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
The Watson and Crick version always overshadows the work of Rosalind Franklin. As a woman this upsets me tremendously, and as a friend of many cancer survivors shame on the Nobel Laureate program for using this as an excuse to overlook her achievements.
Cassira455 1 year ago
Comment removed
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
this man is my hero. he's a historical figure now.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
Thanks for this upload, James Watson is a legend.
STEPHENWRAYSFORD33 1 year ago
greeks were white, romans were white, franks were white, germans were white, spaniards were white, saxons and normans were white, and their accomplishment are theirs, not yours. nor are the egyptians. sorry fact is fact, don't hide from it; embrace fact and reality and you will evolve as a person.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce
"Researchers have concluded that a significant number of modern Europeans can trace their ancestry to Arabs who immigrated to the continent thousands of years ago." writes tamim. "Dr. Lounes Chikhi
The spread of the Middle Eastern genes within Europe is not uniform. While an individual in Greece and the Balkans has between 70-100% of Arab genes, people in France and Germany have 15-30%. People in western France and England have as little as 10% of these genes.
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural White people are their own race. We evolved from a common ancestor. Nobody denies on some level we all share similar genes. You know nothing about genetics do you? lol
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol....if you consider Greeks to be "white" then you should also consider Arabs and Indians to be white...since genetically Arabs, Indians, and "whites" are all very similar and all have Caucasoid shaped skulls
you don't know anything about genetics do you? just trapped in denial
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
afro-centrists are very good at twisting history so much they contradict all logic and historic, archeological, genetic, or scientific fact. twisting the laws of reality, history, and sanity to fit their desire to feel important.
they're also very vocal with their lack of knowledge as to be parodies of themselves.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sub Saharan Africa has produced very early instances of carbon steel found to be in production around 2000 years before present in northwest Tanzania, based on complex preheating principles. These discoveries, according to Schmidt and Avery (archaeologists credited with the discovery) are significant for the history of metallurgy
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sub Saharan Africa has produced very early instances of carbon steel found to be in production around 2000 years before present in northwest Tanzania, based on complex preheating principles. These discoveries, according to Schmidt and Avery (archaeologists credited with the discovery) are significant for the history of metallurgy
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
We live in a world where your ethnic identity does not necessarily match with your cultural one. As such all this division on race is a red herring and a nonsense and James Watson absolutely was right to have been sacked for beeing so loose and racist with his implications considering his position. He has been made to look so stupid because his comments were not based on any scientific fact. Shame.. now look at the idiots black people have to deal with
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
They had great cultural technological advance that was brought to them from the Vedas, at that time was when the hindus valley civilization as well as many cultures in mesoamerica were fully trading with them also. The problem was that after that the great flood changed human history.
1nV1nC1Bl3BaLaM 1 year ago
I should say that i'm not racist at all but if you are African you will try to believe that your ancestors built the pyramids the same if you were white etc, and that's not the point. I'm not a hindu but I give them credit because in all my research i've done shows that Sumerians had a cultural base from India and after that they expanded throughout the middle east.
1nV1nC1Bl3BaLaM 1 year ago
And the "??" weren't supposed to be there, my bad.
1nV1nC1Bl3BaLaM 1 year ago
The Indians knew a more sophisticated system of astronomy that even today is not fully known to actual astronomers, as well did the Mayans(there's a difference between Mayans, Toltecs and Incas(different cultures)). There's much proof about that in the Vedic scriptures and way before the supposed Aryan invasion myth?
1nV1nC1Bl3BaLaM 1 year ago
And "romanpr1nce" I was expecting to get that kind of opinion from you?
1nV1nC1Bl3BaLaM 1 year ago
From Africa? Well I suppose you try to discredit the Indians for their accomplishments and that's nothing new to me. If you really think the origins of mankind all come from Africa you are wrong and you injuring your mind.
1nV1nC1Bl3BaLaM 1 year ago
i love the myth that people use in saying the greeks got some of their information from india. the ancient indians believed the world was a plate on top of a turtle, with a giant snake wrapped around that. the greek philosophers and mathematicians had the scientific method, not mysticism.
romanpr1nce 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol....anyone who really believes that Indians believed the world was a plate on top of a turtle is either misinformed or an idiot....Isaac Newton, Nikola Tesla, and Robert Oppenheimer were all interested in and influenced by Indian philosophy
The Upanishads and other Indian scriptures is > than all of primitive Greek mountain gods nonsense
The Greek philosophers Pythagoras, Arrian, Apollonius, and others all traveled to India and were influenced by India
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce Ancient Greeks called Northern Europeans pale barbarians and viewed Nubians, Egyptians, Indians, and basically everyone as higher than a pale barbarian
Greek writing also comes from the Arabs, Greeks are likely Arab migrants, Arabs started Greek civilization
BTW Indian religions are the only ones that mention multiple universes and atoms
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
@UnnaturallyNatural no your referring to a quote form an ancient greek philosopher who wrote the greek skin tone was superior to the inferior "burned face people of the south" and the "pale skin" of the north. that theirs was fair but not too pale
greek writings came from greeks, arabs burned down the library of alexandria and stole greek writings
your revising history to fit your anti-white point of view but you fool only yourself.
i know your insecure but really your lack of knowledge is sad
romanpr1nce 1 year ago
@romanpr1nce lol....stop living in fantasy with your pro-white version of history and wake up to reality
according to the Greek Polemon of Laodicea pale skin and light hair were signs of barbarianism
The Greeks described themselves as much darker than the Northern European barbarians
you are just in denial trapped in Eurocentricism
UnnaturallyNatural 1 year ago
Well it seems that you believe they used their highly advanced abacus, when the truth is that Sumerians the earliest known civilization for Westerners got most of their knowledge from ancient India.
1nV1nC1Bl3BaLaM 1 year ago
@1nV1nC1Bl3BaLaM
amd in turn the indians got theirs from africa - but the major breakthroughs all came from europe much later
ThomasRowsell 1 year ago