@Birdieupon I'm pretty sure it is. I saw an interview with Stenger in which he criticised WLC for using the idea of a singularity in his arguments despite the idea being apparently disregarded by most of the scientific community.
The Lord has already proven Himself to all of civilized humanity. All of mankind already accepts His appearance and activities as scientific facts, with the single exception of the deluded atheist, whose beliefs are in the extreme miniscule minority worldwide.
The lunatic atheist must present a viable argument in favor of his bizarre personal belief that God somehow doesn't exist before being taken seriously, which he has failed to do, sadly.
@Purushadasa So are you a Theist? what do you think came before the big bang. Actually I have seen some good science lectures on pre big bang stuff, just not many people talking about it, mostly focusing on the big bang or the moments right after it.
If you're interested in opinion, you'll have to ask someone else.
If you're interested in fact, then you need to understand that God's factual appearance and activities, His devotees, and His spiritual abode all exist prior to, during, and after the so-called "big bang."
@Purushadasa I do not have to support my belief. You who possit the existence of God have the burden of proving his/her existence. Not the other way around. I cannot disprove nor prove the existence of God, anymore than I can prove or disprove that there is a flying teapot floating around the sun singing a cute little song to the moons of Jupiter. OK?
You posit the personal belief that God somehow "doesn't exist in the realm of fact," yet you offer no evidence for that personal belief. Do you have any evidence for your bizarre personal belief, or did you just make it up?
If you present none, then the conclusion must be that you just made it up.
Is that Vic Stenger in the audience?
Birdieupon 1 year ago
@Birdieupon I'm pretty sure it is. I saw an interview with Stenger in which he criticised WLC for using the idea of a singularity in his arguments despite the idea being apparently disregarded by most of the scientific community.
Alexdurrant7 1 year ago
The Lord has already proven Himself to all of civilized humanity. All of mankind already accepts His appearance and activities as scientific facts, with the single exception of the deluded atheist, whose beliefs are in the extreme miniscule minority worldwide.
The lunatic atheist must present a viable argument in favor of his bizarre personal belief that God somehow doesn't exist before being taken seriously, which he has failed to do, sadly.
Purushadasa 1 year ago
@Purushadasa Well said!
1GodOnlyOne 10 months ago
I dont see why you cant go back in time beyond the other side of the singularity.
ethankegley 1 year ago
Theists can, but the lower animal and the atheist cannot.
Purushadasa 1 year ago
@Purushadasa So are you a Theist? what do you think came before the big bang. Actually I have seen some good science lectures on pre big bang stuff, just not many people talking about it, mostly focusing on the big bang or the moments right after it.
ethankegley 1 year ago
If you're interested in opinion, you'll have to ask someone else.
If you're interested in fact, then you need to understand that God's factual appearance and activities, His devotees, and His spiritual abode all exist prior to, during, and after the so-called "big bang."
Purushadasa 1 year ago
@Purushadasa God doesnt exist in the realm of fact.
ethankegley 1 year ago
Comment removed
Purushadasa 1 year ago
@Purushadasa I do not have to support my belief. You who possit the existence of God have the burden of proving his/her existence. Not the other way around. I cannot disprove nor prove the existence of God, anymore than I can prove or disprove that there is a flying teapot floating around the sun singing a cute little song to the moons of Jupiter. OK?
ethankegley 1 year ago
You posit the personal belief that God somehow "doesn't exist in the realm of fact," yet you offer no evidence for that personal belief. Do you have any evidence for your bizarre personal belief, or did you just make it up?
If you present none, then the conclusion must be that you just made it up.
Purushadasa 1 year ago
if anyone is even remotely interested in these topics, it's hard to imagine that they haven't watched plenty of dr. craig videos lol
MarkThisWayAfter 2 years ago 3
154 views?it is a shame that so few people are interested in such interesting questions and nice lectures
boromir2007 3 years ago 9
Exacly what I was thinking.
95TurboSol 3 years ago 4
Maybe nobody knows about it.
luisdstripper 2 years ago 4
@boromir2007 Youtube actively suppresses Theist video views by limiting exposure to the general public, sadly.
1GodOnlyOne 10 months ago
@1GodOnlyOne It does? How?
DigitalDecadence 8 months ago in playlist William Lane Craig Templeton Foundation Lecture