George Galloway talks to Howard in Manchester on Iran & Ahmajinedad - Talksport 26/12/2008

[islamway123]

Ok, so the politics shouldn't be lead by religion, but Israel has the right to exist because the Bible tells so?

[cdj1000mk2]

This guy sound like a hateful Jew to me.. (nasal pseudo American Israeli tone)

I think I dislike his love of divine profits more than the Iranian love of divine prophets.

After all he is suggesting that the Iranians bow down to the laws of a 200 hundred year old (max) old Dictatorship- Iran is one of the oldest CIVILISED countries in history.

I am from Aberdeen and have no bias before you say anything

[STONEISLAND38]

HITLER DONE A GOOD JOB HE KNEW DIRTY ZIONIST JEWISH RATS WERE A THREAT TO ALL MANKIND BLACK AND WHITE

[nowisyourtime]

so the world should run on international law which is set by the western countries.. so we should all live by the rules set by one country namely the US. Yet he has no time for the us position on Iran and middle eastern countries in general??? makes no sense to me.

[Soloman1001]

trigot

After you.

..

[Soloman1001]

Galloway has stated that he doesnt agree with Democracy and is a Proven LIAR

Enough said.

..

[Soloman1001]

This guy Howard is way to intelligent and on the ball for Galloway to handle..So he cuts him off at the end..What a surprise..LOL!

..

[Reqrezentin]

@Soloman1001 We meet again

[frickadele]

Separation of church and state.

Your cult beliefs...

are yours and yours alone.

Put it in politics...

and you are my enemy.

[Reqrezentin]

Hahaha, monkeybusiness

[ItzMeRon]

George Galloway is a Hero.

[yington]

Doesn't this reveal what a hypocrite George Galloway is?

2 reasons:

-He repeatably criticised the Bush administration for having a "fundamental Christian" agenda, yet defends Ahmedinijad having a far more extreme one.

-If Israel had commited the act that Iran did re: Human Rights, he would know about it, and be beating his chest. Yet he doesn't care about the acts of Iran, which is why he didn't know. He selects the injustice to care about according to his own perverse agenda.

[brett18uk]

The answer to your question is no.

Firstly, RE Bush and the neo-cons - they were actively waging war against other countrys and spreading violence everywhere. Iran hasn't invaded another country in more than 300 years, so no - there's no hypocrisy there.

- Secondly, Galloway has campaigned tirelessly for human rights in the middle east and has been consistent in stating he doesn't think much of the Iranian government - certainly the President. His point is that it is up to the Iranian...

[brett18uk]

..people to choose their government - not the USA, nor you yington. He's been consistent on that point, whilst ad vocating human rights, so no there's no hypocrisy there either.

[yington]

1. George Galloway repeatably criticised Bush and his team when they discussed God in their administration. He calls for secularism, except when he is defending people like Ahmedinijad whom he sides with because the enemy of his enemy is his friend.

-The Iranian people have no choice to elect a religious adminstration, secularism is not permitted in Iran by law, and cannnot run for office. So you are wrong. And if Israel had committed this, he would have known immediately, and screamed.

[jayjay1179]

let me simplify the equation for you.

The ONLY and i repeat ONLY nations on EARTH slaughtering the citizens of other soverign nations are the USA-UK and Israel.

Knowing this fact you have the audacity to point fingers at the "human rights" record of Iran.

Are you serious? Really,i mean what planet are you from?

[yington]

Of course I am going to point out the human rights record of Iran.

-They execute apostates from Islam, denying freedom of religion

-Homosexuality is illegal and punishable by death

-Women have been stoned to death by law

-Peodophilia was legalised as a man can marry a girl as young as 9

-Secularism is prohibited by law, and people cannot stand for president with this

-Freedom of speech is regularly curtailed.

Do you support these laws or something?

What planet are you from?

[jayjay1179]

as per usual you have no response to my points and predictably resort to baseless propaganda.

Your lies simply dont wash!

[yington]

You didn't make any points at all. You for some reason said something about USA and America, when the entire topic had nothing to do with them.

Then you said about me "pointing fingers" at the human rights of Iran.

I stated the numerous human rights abuses in Iran, and the laws that are disgusting in the country. These are facts.

What is incorrect of what I have said of Iran?

Your childish response merely shows that you are unable to discuss this subject with any intelligence at all.

[jayjay1179]

you sir are deeply unwell.Seek help urgently.

[yington]

In other words, you are completely defeated in this subject, and your sign off to confirm this is with an idiotic post like that.

Stick to colouring books, you might have more success there.

[TributePA]

yington you are wrong.

1. It is illegal to set out seeking to convert Muslims to Christianity. Converts, however, are NOT executed

2. Any executed homosexuals have been executed because they have committed another crime e.g. rape

3. In 2008 Iran announced that stoning is no longer allowed.

4. The legal age for marriage in Iran is 18, or 15 with parental consent. The same as in many States in America.

5. Secularism is not prohibited. Iran is an Islamic state in the same manner as...

[TributePA]

Britain is a Christian state. You cannot be head of state in Britain if you are not a Christian. However, neither state prohibits secularism.

6. All nations curtail free sppech to some extent. Many states have greater restrictions, on free speech, than Iran.

It would appear that you are confusing Iran with America and Britian's ally Saudi Arabia

[arabz4for4life]

all those u just mentioned doesnt have to do with USA-UK or israel .. its not ur business .. are those points effecting you or israel ??? No. then its not ur business to attack iran for those statements ! no one signed the usa to be the police of the world !!! these points u just mentioned are not effecing any other country !!!! ur points justify nothing !