all these theory's are shit. some pot head flew planes into the two towers and they fell down okay! thousands of people died as if the government would plan it.... :S
Acts 20:26 Wherefore I take you to record this day, that I [am] pure from the blood of all [men].
Ezekiel 33:4 Then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet, and taketh not warning; if the sword come, and take him away, his blood shall be upon his own head.
03:00 is not the right time its like 3,5-4,0 just watch carefully.you can see the dust coming from below.That was when they were blasting up steel columns.
WTC+WTC7 were such a nice controlled demolitions.
you can see and dust cloud comin from the building.You cant see it ? watch again and slowly.This isnt the main evidence for sure.There are more logic evidences that can not be hidden.This kid who uploaded this vid proves a shit.
you guys can keep your bitchin at each other over an incident no one knows the truth about but look at how it comes down. it makes no sense that it fell so perfectly w/o taking down everything in it's path. the plane crashes were so high up that yeah, maybe the top could POSSIBLY fall off but come on, how did it come down floor by floor when the tower is that tall. i'm not saying it was an inside job at all but simply that it all looks suspicious. don't you think?
WTC7 collapse crw?... 'piecs of a 200,000 ton building hitting it,and it was on fire pretty much from top to bottom' your theory. Larry Silverstein even said he decided to 'pull it'. heres a video..
/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A&NR=1
now call me stupid and you already have but that looks like a controlled demo to me just as Mr Silverstein said happened and I certainly don't see fire from top to bottom.
By the wat crw those links do not answer the questions. i am on your side but the 911 official story just doesnt ring true and if you are happy with it then fair enough we will never see eye to eye just dont slag people off for having a concerned opinion.
pathetic? oh you must mean pathetic because i'm right? why don't you try and be a winner sometime? i've asked you for 1 thing,and you can't even do that
i guess science isnt always right. They said the fuel wasnt hot enough to melt the steel but I guess we cant rely on science. I'm down with the government. I believe them because I know theyre good. George Bush would never lie to us!
how could these floors be falling at "free-falling" speed, if they were collapsing on eachother one layer after another? 9/11 was an inside job. our government has been doing this kinda shit for years.
its not that hard ... when the plane hit It got the Suspension beams which weakend the building and allowed it to fall ... shut up wit the gov. crap.. why would they go and kill 2000 people tell me a good reason why and i would like to see where the "Missile" is that knocked down the building for all we know you people probably made that up just to make the gov. look bad .. they wouldn't kill people that are innocent and pay them ... come on and think
So what brought WTC7 down then? I don't remember a plane hitting that, hitting its suspension beams and weakening the building and this is a genuine question thats all.
WTC7 collapse... 'piecs of a 200,000 ton building hitting it,and it was on fire pretty much from top to bottom' your theory. Larry Silverstein even said he decided to 'pull it'. heres a video..
/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A&NR=1
now call me stupid and you already have but that looks like a controlled demo to me just as Mr Silverstein said happened and I certainly don't see fire from top to bottom.
what do you mean where are they? did you eat a bowl of stupid this morning? over 100 people saw the plane hit the pentagon,and in PA they recovered more wreckage from that plane than from any other.
No I just watched the news at the time and i saw no considerable wreckage at PA at all and the pentagon only had a few engine parts and bits that weren't even from the right type of plane... but please if im stupid send me a link to footage of both, I typed 'flight 93 wreckage' in youtube for example....nope nothing hmmm strange. maybe you should eat a bowl of wake the f*** up!
ok i admit I am so stupid to ask questions about 911. you and your nasty attitude is right how stupid of me to think the history of the american government has always been whiter than white.
crwnikeboy you are brilliant and you are correct. Thanks for those links. im so stupid for asking questions
I've seen the whole documentary. He was the only guy that came out with footage of the attack. He didn't want to film a lot of fucked up things though.
dude that was like mmm how do i said it i was way to firm and it fell right on the side not directly down and it fell on a bulding by one of the most powerfull in the NY i dont think that was pure coincidence!!! peace out!
Bombs sound like a LOT of work and time to place properly. Why wouldn't they have just fly 2 planes loaded with jet fuel into them? You are all fuckin tinfoil hat wearing suckers if you believe your government did this to itself.
The CIA was connected to all the right people who ran security in these buildings and at the airports the flights were hijacked out of...
There was a 9 month Elevaotr Renovation performed inside the towers in the months leading up to 9/11, an able time window for explosives to be installed into the buildings.
All the evidence to prove this was an INSIDE JOB is there, I suggest doing some research!
@chuckeieio during the power down is when they put explosives in the building.why do you think we want to go to the middle east for? oillllllllllllllllll! 60% of the worlds oil
Everyone stfu it is not a fucking bomb it was 2 fucking airplanes crashing into 2 fucking towers and killing alot of fucking people there was no fucking bomb END IT.
The building fell onto itself because of the "pancaking effect" - look it up. It's a sort of chain reaction when one floor falls onto another floor, and the already-weakened metal of the building can't take the stress and falls all the way down, floor after floor. My point - it didn;t fall all at once, and the metal didn't need to completely melt.
There were no firemen fighting the small fires in WTC 7. No one had been in that building since 11 am. No fire official ever goes to the guy leasing a building from the Port Authority to ask his advice on how to fight fires or where he should place his men.
Anyone who thinks this video doesn't show the use of explosives in that tower doesn't have enough understanding of the structure to comment. But thanks for the video.
"Pull it" is a firefighter term which means to PULL OUT of there. You want to argue with a firefighter about this? If you do, you're in for a serious wake up call.
Oh hey there civilwar1863. Today your a firefighter huh? Last week it was a commercial pilot. Before that it was an engineer. Your really an expert in a lot of fields.
My thought, since I'm a firefighter and I know damn well WTF I'm talking about, is COMPRESSED AIR. Think I'm wrong? Go to DEBUNKING911 dot COM it'll show you scientific proof instead of just looking with your eyes. Read, read and read some more before you come to any theory.
No, it doesn't come out BEFORE. Looks like wishful thinking on your part. No demo experts say those are squibs. Even Jowenko specifically says they're not.
If people are unemployed, they make up a conspiracy theory that's insane and the "truth", never mind that it makes no sense. This will give them attention, and if they get lucky, they'll get payed to write a book about their theory, making them some money to pay their electric bills.
Are you a member of the bomb squad? Are you a demolitions expert? Do you know what hazardous compounds that were in the WTC and Pentagon? Does jet fuel contain sulfur? What is the melting point of aluminum?
Do you know what temp steel melts at? do you know what thermite and thermate are. Do you know what moltent steel in the base of wtc 1&2 means. How about what buildings falling at free fall speed means. Or colums being sheered and perfect 45deg angles? one thing you dont know is how to debate legitimate points
"No demolition expert in the world agrees it was a controlled demolition." Thank you PoetryHound! I don't know what the hell people see "squibs" for? Don't they know that there's air pressure inside the buildings as they were coming down? There waa so much AIR PRESSURE THAT THE WINDOWS BLEW OUT!
You are wrong. plain and simple how can you make statements like that when they are just false? Many demolition experts have said that wtc 1&2 had to be controlled and wtc 7 was without doubt.
Then where did the planes go and crew? Where are they 2day? What is your PHD in explosives, metalurgics? How many national security meetings have you been to? Are you member of the local fire dept? Do you have certificates from FEMA? Are you a building architect? Are you an iron worker? Do you know what a fire triangle is? Do you know what aluminum oxide is?
Conspiracy therorist are idiots, plain and simple. Clearly you guys ain't no building architects nor do you see what's happening. The WTC were basically hollowed out building. You've got an outter wall and an inner core with no supports holding the floors up in between them. I'll go look up some facts to disprove your claims.
Nice try! we all saw the nova special you are parroting trying to pretend you actually know somthing. Even in their computer animation the center collums stayed standing. the building desing was to support two jet crashesh and stay standing. you people are so ignorant it makes me sick
I guess this video does explain the squibs and the random floors closures in the WTC, weeks b4 9/11 for building "inspections" and why the bomb sniffing dogs were pulled out of the builiding after these "inspections". It also justifies why bush isnt doing shit all in afganistan and why hes stealing oil from the iraqies. Just face it buddy the US governement killed thousands of innocent plp just to get what they wanted. Oh ya are u like the only guy who actually voted for bush.
Yeah good point. The camera pointed seconds before someone pulled it down. Buildings down fall ontheir footprints so prestine and faster then gravitational pull, by accident. That's a masterpiece of A+ planning for weeks/months.
You non "conspiracy" morons need to put down your beer turn off the football game and actually look into things before you post comments letting the rest of the world know how lazy and ignorant you are
Danny jowenko jowenko expslosive demolitions inc, Van romero former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center , or how about the fact that Larry Silverstein the owner of the buildings admitted on pbs he had them "pull" building seven. the word "Pull" means blow up in demolition terms. If you looked into it you would find hundreds of experts in many fields believe the same to be true. But im sure you know more then they do
You're wtong. Danny Jowenko specifically said he did NOT believe the twin towers came down in controlled demolitions. How come you didn't know that? How come you didn't know that Romero does NOT think the towers came down in controlled demolitions? I repeat: There is not a single demo expert that says the twin towers came down in controlled demolitions. Not one.
why do you have such a hard on for this? why are you on youtube watching the towers fall anyway? people look into this yourselves poetryhound and civilwar just make stuff up you can probably watch the jowenko video on here were he says catagoricaly wtc7 was a controlled domolition look it up
In order to believe WTFC 7 was a controlled demo, you have to ignore the fact that Jowenko wasn't told pertinent information, you have to ignore the fact that "pull" doesn't mean explosive demo, you have to ignore the fact that no demo charges were seen or heard, & ignore all the FDNY statements talking about how concerned they were that WTC 7 would collapse. YOu have to ignore real evidence & believe bullshit.
And what real evidence are you privy to that the rest of us aren't scholars for 9/11 truth who are PhDs, Lawyers, professors, have unlike you carefully sifted through the evidence and do not believe what you're saying
Significantly, the 9/11 "scholars" are mainly theologians, history professors, and the like. There are no structural engineers with highrise construction experience, no metallurgists, no seismologists, no forensic engineers, no fire engineers - in short, no one with expertise or experience in the pertinent subject areas. There is no evidence of any explosives at WTC 7. None.
Is it bs that the buildings all fell at near freefall speed(wich is impossible without controled demo) is it bs that no other steel structures in history has been felled from fire is it bs that the firefighters were told the buildings were coming down by guilianis team(why don't nyc cops and firefighters like him anymore?)Is it bs that jet fule burns at 1800deg but steel doesnt even start to weeken till 3000deg.There is a thousand times more evidence against the official story then for it.
w w w. 911research . wtc7 . net you can find an analysis of your Brent Blanchard review here since you brought it up. You have lost this debate give up and face reality I know its scary buddy but you gotta be able to see the forrest for the trees
Well, of course YOU say I've lost this debate. But that's just your opinion. And that's typical of conspiracy theorists - always substituting opinion for fact. Nothing but unsubstantiated assertions, misinterpretations, false information, and questions. But no evidence of any government plot & no evidence of explosives use.
BTW, Jim Hoffman is not demolition expert. Interestingly, he says absolutely nothing in response to the quote I used below - that "pull it" refers not to the use of explosives, but to pulling a structure over with cables. So much for "pull it" meaning "blow up." You can still claim whatever you want, but there's no substantiation for it.
You are the one making claims that are just flat out lies.the buildings didn't fall at near freefall? where is your eveidence of the official story? where? other then you believe what they tell you to believe. You get all your info from the same debunking website. Almost everyone who understands the way the world actually works doesn't believe what your saying YOU HAVE NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE TO BACK YOURSELF UP
Who says WTC 7 fell at freefall speed? Near freefall is more like it. The freefall claim is certainly not based on the seismic record. Columbia Univ's Palisades Station recorded the ground impact at 18 seconds, suggesting that the South part of the building fell first. You can't tell that from the North side videos although you can see the East penthouse fall first. Also, in the rubble pile, the North side of the building shrouded the rest of debris, likewise suggesting it fell second.
The definition in the dictionary of to "pull" or to "pull down" means to demolish. How is it possible that all three buildings fell into there own footprint without the mathmatical calculations needed. If it was possible demo experts would brig down building with fire as opposed to explosives. What you suggest just isn't rationaly possible. Thermite was found on the colums. Thats not debatable
You've already seen that in demolition circles, "pull" refers not to explosive demo but to pulling down with cables. Even Jim Hoffman does not dispute that. So there's no longer any basis for defining "pull" as "blow up." How can you claim the 3 bldgs fell in their footprints when they damaged buildings around them? No thermite was was found on any columns and that's a fact that even Steven Jones would not dispute. You seem to be misinformed on nearly everything.
No you seem to want to blatantly lie about the fact its silly .prisonplanet. com / articles / march2007 / 180307WTC7 .htm "pull" means to demolomish. you are either in severe denail or just into lieing because you're completely wrong on everything and it has to be on purpose because you are aware of all the names involvled where did dr jones find the thermite then?
As you may know, "pull" has many meanings. As has already been explained to you, the demolition industry uses "pull" to refer to demolish with cables, not with explosives. Even the guy you cite, Jim Hoffman, does not dispute this. Is the person at prisonplanet a demolition expert? Apparently not. Find a demo expert who agrees that "pull" refers to explosives and then rational people may agree with you. Until then, you're simply wrong about the definition.
Prof. Steven Jones, who conducted his PhD research at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility, has analyised materials from WTC and has detected the existence of thermate, used for "cutting" the steel support columns, as evident in the photo below.
Former BYU professor Steven Jones, who originated the thermite theory, said he found "thermate traces," but the thermate markers he identified, most prominently sulfur, are also markers for other common things in the buildings, chiefly gypsum from the wallboard that was common in office partitions. Jones' has not been able to get scientific corroboration for his findings. Basically, the only people who agree with him are non-scientists.
Ok poetryhound you said pull doesn't mean demolish, the dictionary says it does! You said jowenko never said it was a demolition then you said he did, but he was wrong, you said steven jones didn't find thermite when he did.You said steel could melt at 1800deg when 2750deg is more like it you either contradict everything you say or you just lie
Who says WTC 7 fell at freefall speed? Not the seismic record, just people who read it who are not seismologists. You're right that it's BS that the firefighters were told by Guiliani that WTC 7 was coming down. It was the FDNY that made the determination & told everyone else. You've got the steel weakening temp wrong. So far, the only thing that's really BS is the crap you claim is evidence. There is no evidence explosives were used at WTC 7.
He says wtc7 is definately a controlled demolition (Jowenko). Your just a pathetic fucking lying sack of shit. Ha ha! No more bill of rights PoetryHOund. Martial law for you is right around the corner. Papers please!
The interviewer didn't tell Jowenko the building got hit by WTC1, that it had major fires raging in it (according to FDNY), that in footage with sound there is no sign of detonation charges, or that the collapse was expected by FDNY & other experts on the scene. So he didn't have all the info that would have been useful to make a judgment. Perhaps if you stopped foaming at the mouth you'd be able to think more clearly.
"We have never, ever heard the term 'pull it' being used to refer to the explosive demo of a bldg, & neither has any blast team we've spoken with. The term is used in conventional demolition circles to describe the specific activity of attaching long cables to a pre-weakened bldg & maneuvering heavy equipment to 'pull' the frame of the structure over onto its side for further dismantlement." Brent Blanchard, Senior Editor, Implosion World, & Director of Field Operations, Protec
Compressed air has enormous energy. Being such a large area falling down the air flowing down the core/elevator shafts at high velocity would easly find the weakest exits and vent causing the dust clouds that the conspiracy theorists seem to think are explosions. The structure failed due to thousands of tons of impact force from plane not from explosives. God bless the innocent every day people who died and they're familys and friends....
To bring down WTC 7 in front of the worlds media would be audacious enough but to bring down the entire WTC site including the towers, plus blow up a large portion of the Pentagon as well as pointlessly crashing an aircraft in the middle of a field is logistically impossible. Why do we continue to notice patterns in things that aren't there ?
78 floors fell in about ten seconds. Think about it. That's less than a second per floor. That's faster than gravity. Impossible!!! Where's the resistance from the floors below. Were these floors made of syrofoam???
Look at the top floors of the north tower when it was hit, air exploded downward and upward. Air travelled so rapidly it blew a restroom apart in Windows. One person trapped up there thought a bomb had gone off in there. I have yet to see any of these conspiracy idiots mention that.
ok people there was no bomb planted before and the puffs of smoke at the bottem as some of u say "is the bomb going off" is really when the tower started to fall air was being pushed down but the ruble causeing dust and other stuff out of the bottem. but sad vid...
not controlled demo. Watch any video of cont. demo and u will hear a LOT of rapid explosions right before the building collapses. This does NOT happen here. Also, the top part of the building tilts slightly, THEN collapses - so again, NOT a controlled demo. The puffs are compressed air forcing out debris. Also, 3 or 4 puffs?! that;s REALLY gonna bring a 110 story building down :|
Dont you think for a tower falling down it would have been louder in reality? This was certainly recorded on a shitty camera, certainly not a broadcast standard camera.
Anything being emitted out from the bottom of the tower most likely came from the elevators shafts; these would have acted as 'tunnels' through which the dust would have been expelled as the building fell in on itself. As has been said before, there are no sounds of explosions on this footage (you can hear just about everything else though) and it was a pretty powerful and unprecedented event to have happened.
This was shot damned close to ground zero...No wonder the cameraman chickened out after a few seconds of filming the collapse, to try to get the f*ck out of there!
This really comes down to a matter of who you want to believe. Either you think the government is lying to you or they're telling the truth. Similar case as Kennedy's assassination. Was it Oswald or some guy on the grassy knoll? I tend to think the government is lying and there's a lot they're not telling us. Who knows? I'm sure nobody here does.
I definitely saw little puffs of smoke coming out of the building. personally i think they're explosions bringing it down in a controlled fasion. i doubt the plane was what made it fall.
Gosh, the gases you see come from the lower sides the of the building is mearly air rushing out of the building due to the huge pressure of the upper stories collapsing!!! Not explosions you poor minded thinkers!!!
there was a frickin engineer involved with 9/11, so there probably were men of middle eastern decent probably dressing up to look like maintenance workers inside the wtc buildings who knew exactly where the hijackers could hit the towers to make it look like a controlled demolition. There was even a witness who saw the workers like the last weekend before that Tuesday or something.
Sim if you think the government "wanted" the buildings to fall you are mistaken if not a crack head.
Explosions ? Jaysus people get fucking real. Billlions of tons of material pancacking down on frame work that has windows. Do you recall the sound of your fat ass sitting on your couch pillow ?
listen with headphones on....right b4 it falls anfd all the way down you can hear a low explosion over and over again...you have to listen very close.
there owuldnt be a puf fof smoke near the bottom like that unless it was caused by something blowing up near the bottom. if it was AIR then there would be tons of windows blowing out near the top way before the bottom was
Watch at about 3-4 seconds into it, near the bottom left of the building, ull see a puff, then a few seconds after near the top of the collapse ull see a couple more,
I kinda belived the govermant wanted to take the towers down (thats my opinion I saw loose change and well you know the rest) and blame other countrys just to make new enemies.
prison planet dot com has the articles you can do a search there...oh and i have no fixed opinion one way or another yet..the jurys still out...but its deliberating hard
fact is bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the wtc the day before the attacks... oh and george bushs BROTHER and COUSIN were heads of the company that provided security for the towers Can you blame people for being suspcious? bush really cant push a broom ur right. but he can be pushed to do a lot of things by others. just look at iraq...you never know
lol @ russinhesperia. ur missing the premise these guys put forth. if they just used explosives they would have to explain how "terrorists" got enough explosives (which is a LOT) in the wtc to bring it down without noone knowing. the planes were the plausible attack and the explosives were - in their opinion - the assistance needed to bring the buildings down, which would be such a dramatic image the ppl would rally behind the government.
the ONLY time a building EVER collapsed were the WTC towers and building 7 all in ONE DAY! Coincidence right?Oh and by the way STEEL BENDS!it DOESNT turn into dust like in the video. If the planes DID melt the steel why does the WHOLE BUILDING DISINTEGRATE?
NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF SKYSCRAPERS, has one fallen due to fire OR a plane hitting it.The EMPIRESTATE building was hit by a plane and all it had was millions of dollars worth of damage and burnt LONGER than the WTC towers.
no explosives just planes, think about it idiots, if they had explosives they wouldnt have needed the planes, you fucking imbiciles, 'oh yea bush did it' u fucking clowns, bush didnt do it, how could a guy that can barely manage a broom closet convince people to become kamakazi pilots. ur just a bunch of whining turd sniffers.
this documentory clearly shows explosive's and many other mysterious things going on at the wtc - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=9%2F11+eyewitness
there were explosions, thermite and sulfer was used - i have countless videos of reporter's, firemen, eyewitnesses saying there were explosions, and it was all done in building #7 (that was not hit by a plane) where they "pulled" (destroyed the building) to hide the evidence of thier invovlement.
I have video taken inside Tower 1 - the north tower - that shows all the glass blown out on the lobby level before the towers fell. This was from the impact of the planes, forcing air and fuel down the elevator shafts at such force it blasted the ground-floor windows out. No explosion other than the planes themselves.
There is NOTHING I can see in any of the videos that would indicate controlled demolition makes more sense than what actually happened. You tinfoil hat guys are simply wrong, and I wish you would find some other "conspiracy" to wet yourselves over.
You guys who say it wasn't just fire that brought down the towers are right in one sense: it was fire PLUS the fact of being hit by two airliners going full speed into the towers. The collapses began at the point of most damage from the aircraft, where the buildings were weakest.
there were if u ever watch a documentary of the collapse there are fireman saying that before they got out of the 1st WTC before the plane hit walls were already startin to collapse and no one mentioned any thing cuz everyon thought it was vibrations from the airplane besides our government is behind the terror attack thats wh i cant wait to move outta here and move to madagascar off of africa
I think the guy died because of all the glass coming at him
and the rest of the people running
CinnamonMewMew4evar 2 months ago
all these theory's are shit. some pot head flew planes into the two towers and they fell down okay! thousands of people died as if the government would plan it.... :S
jayrayatt 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
May 21 is Judgment Day!
Acts 20:26 Wherefore I take you to record this day, that I [am] pure from the blood of all [men].
Ezekiel 33:4 Then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet, and taketh not warning; if the sword come, and take him away, his blood shall be upon his own head.
~W A T C H~
dimstar4now 8 months ago
did that guy die or someone grabed it
justcause237 9 months ago
@NonLinearSioux WTF, How's That Awesome?! The World Trade Center just collapsed! :l
crazydevil197 1 year ago
all of these people you see running here died.
Lighthouse713 1 year ago
Holy shit
SamShackleford1 1 year ago
WORST day of my life .man
KaY17777 1 year ago
RIP!
akitycat 1 year ago
wasn't an inside job
sbandat90 1 year ago
run forest ruuun.[ haha ] god bless. <3
R.I.P dad. <3
eliashleyyy 2 years ago
@eliashleyyy That's not funny....
punkduck123 1 year ago
godbless
chinarecor2 2 years ago
But elevation far fly but these people died
wiktorstasiu96 2 years ago
sweet god of jesus
5Amazon5 2 years ago
omfg... :|
anderzofsweden 3 years ago
There's no way we will ever know all the truth behind 9/11.
People just believe what they choose to believe.
Myself...personally not gonna get fooled any more by all the lies out there: 9/11=SCAM
alkatifa04 3 years ago
there was thermite and possably bombs now shut the hell up
alienscreatedhumans 3 years ago
Glad we're on the same page...but who are u to tell me to shut up? I'll say whatever I want.
alkatifa04 3 years ago
Oh yea when it came down it shoulda sucked wind and everything out there into a vortex and then teleported to another planet. Unless gore did this.
mdog2700 3 years ago
watch this zeitgeist part about WTC
there are 4 parts about WTC here's the first one
watch?v=7_E4N5YIycI
who believes in 9/11 is and completely brainwashed moron nothing more.
9/11=inside job
HorusTheNinth 3 years ago
i would freak out...........SCREW DAT!!!!!!!
id30296 3 years ago
03:00 is not the right time its like 3,5-4,0 just watch carefully.you can see the dust coming from below.That was when they were blasting up steel columns.
WTC+WTC7 were such a nice controlled demolitions.
9/11=inside job
HorusTheNinth 3 years ago
haha you moron you just uploaded and nice evidence
stop at
03:00
and
06:00
you can see and dust cloud comin from the building.You cant see it ? watch again and slowly.This isnt the main evidence for sure.There are more logic evidences that can not be hidden.This kid who uploaded this vid proves a shit.
9/11=fucking lie
HorusTheNinth 3 years ago
This doesn't prove any thing. 9/11 will always be a mystery.
db2012 3 years ago
Holy shit that gave me chills
RatPackFan88 3 years ago
you guys can keep your bitchin at each other over an incident no one knows the truth about but look at how it comes down. it makes no sense that it fell so perfectly w/o taking down everything in it's path. the plane crashes were so high up that yeah, maybe the top could POSSIBLY fall off but come on, how did it come down floor by floor when the tower is that tall. i'm not saying it was an inside job at all but simply that it all looks suspicious. don't you think?
CutieBooty20322 3 years ago
I saw atleast 2 explosions in this video.
Euugor 3 years ago
WTC7 collapse crw?... 'piecs of a 200,000 ton building hitting it,and it was on fire pretty much from top to bottom' your theory. Larry Silverstein even said he decided to 'pull it'. heres a video..
/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A&NR=1
now call me stupid and you already have but that looks like a controlled demo to me just as Mr Silverstein said happened and I certainly don't see fire from top to bottom.
juttkeys 3 years ago
By the wat crw those links do not answer the questions. i am on your side but the 911 official story just doesnt ring true and if you are happy with it then fair enough we will never see eye to eye just dont slag people off for having a concerned opinion.
juttkeys 3 years ago
then tell me what you think is wrong...i send you links like you asked,and now you say they don't answer the questions you have.
crwnikeboy 3 years ago
is that it??? 2 videos?? pathetic attempts at debunking
juttkeys 3 years ago
pathetic? oh you must mean pathetic because i'm right? why don't you try and be a winner sometime? i've asked you for 1 thing,and you can't even do that
crwnikeboy 3 years ago
i guess science isnt always right. They said the fuel wasnt hot enough to melt the steel but I guess we cant rely on science. I'm down with the government. I believe them because I know theyre good. George Bush would never lie to us!
RandomentalTV 3 years ago
how could these floors be falling at "free-falling" speed, if they were collapsing on eachother one layer after another? 9/11 was an inside job. our government has been doing this kinda shit for years.
TheComaKid 4 years ago
its not that hard ... when the plane hit It got the Suspension beams which weakend the building and allowed it to fall ... shut up wit the gov. crap.. why would they go and kill 2000 people tell me a good reason why and i would like to see where the "Missile" is that knocked down the building for all we know you people probably made that up just to make the gov. look bad .. they wouldn't kill people that are innocent and pay them ... come on and think
Tonto47474 3 years ago
So what brought WTC7 down then? I don't remember a plane hitting that, hitting its suspension beams and weakening the building and this is a genuine question thats all.
juttkeys 3 years ago
piecs of a 200,000 ton building hitting it,and it was on fire pretty much from top to bottom
crwnikeboy 3 years ago
WTC7 collapse... 'piecs of a 200,000 ton building hitting it,and it was on fire pretty much from top to bottom' your theory. Larry Silverstein even said he decided to 'pull it'. heres a video..
/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A&NR=1
now call me stupid and you already have but that looks like a controlled demo to me just as Mr Silverstein said happened and I certainly don't see fire from top to bottom.
juttkeys 3 years ago
the buildings didn't fall at freefall speed,and there's no proof whatsoever of an inside job
crwnikeboy 3 years ago
where are the planes that hit the pentagon and flight 93, guess they just disappeared did they?
juttkeys 3 years ago
what do you mean where are they? did you eat a bowl of stupid this morning? over 100 people saw the plane hit the pentagon,and in PA they recovered more wreckage from that plane than from any other.
crwnikeboy 3 years ago
No I just watched the news at the time and i saw no considerable wreckage at PA at all and the pentagon only had a few engine parts and bits that weren't even from the right type of plane... but please if im stupid send me a link to footage of both, I typed 'flight 93 wreckage' in youtube for example....nope nothing hmmm strange. maybe you should eat a bowl of wake the f*** up!
juttkeys 3 years ago
wrong answer..it was from the right plane. watch these:
/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk
/watch?v=xkivdEGph9A
now close your mouth before the flies get out
crwnikeboy 3 years ago
ok i admit I am so stupid to ask questions about 911. you and your nasty attitude is right how stupid of me to think the history of the american government has always been whiter than white.
crwnikeboy you are brilliant and you are correct. Thanks for those links. im so stupid for asking questions
juttkeys 3 years ago
thank you for bowing to your king
crwnikeboy 3 years ago
yo how do u get videos of what other people filmed like u did
zzaannyy69007 4 years ago
you jerk
bradbradpoo 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet
markbbbm 4 years ago
that's not funny.
prOgrenadier 4 years ago 3
poor firemen : (
SheltonBenjaminrules 4 years ago 2
i remember seeing this on t.v
luke326 4 years ago
I've seen the whole documentary. He was the only guy that came out with footage of the attack. He didn't want to film a lot of fucked up things though.
Adriankat 4 years ago
not explosions...
compressed air from inside the buildings/rooms
TheseYeahThese 4 years ago
I see two small explosions... It's pretty obvious
Gninolps 4 years ago
dude that was like mmm how do i said it i was way to firm and it fell right on the side not directly down and it fell on a bulding by one of the most powerfull in the NY i dont think that was pure coincidence!!! peace out!
artjugler 4 years ago
Bombs sound like a LOT of work and time to place properly. Why wouldn't they have just fly 2 planes loaded with jet fuel into them? You are all fuckin tinfoil hat wearing suckers if you believe your government did this to itself.
chuckeieio 4 years ago 5
I think the 2 airplanes were supposed to be a distraction for those people beleiving the government thing, and yeha, i agree with you
vengeance48 4 years ago
@chuckeieio,
The CIA was connected to all the right people who ran security in these buildings and at the airports the flights were hijacked out of...
There was a 9 month Elevaotr Renovation performed inside the towers in the months leading up to 9/11, an able time window for explosives to be installed into the buildings.
All the evidence to prove this was an INSIDE JOB is there, I suggest doing some research!
NanoThermite911 1 year ago
@chuckeieio during the power down is when they put explosives in the building.why do you think we want to go to the middle east for? oillllllllllllllllll! 60% of the worlds oil
Deadlyliess 1 year ago
@chuckeieio Do you know what the reason is for the tinfoil?
tusmorninginsept 1 year ago
@chuckeieio who said it was the government that planned it??
trailerfitter 1 year ago
@trailerfitter everyone on the internet that is not intelligent (95%)
DRawesomeninjasauce 1 year ago
@DRawesomeninjasauce Perhaps in your country not in ours.
trailerfitter 1 year ago
4 seconds in look at the middle bottom of screen, explosion
WannaBeN00b 4 years ago
Everyone stfu it is not a fucking bomb it was 2 fucking airplanes crashing into 2 fucking towers and killing alot of fucking people there was no fucking bomb END IT.
KingPain14 4 years ago
The building fell onto itself because of the "pancaking effect" - look it up. It's a sort of chain reaction when one floor falls onto another floor, and the already-weakened metal of the building can't take the stress and falls all the way down, floor after floor. My point - it didn;t fall all at once, and the metal didn't need to completely melt.
odobett 4 years ago
There were no firemen fighting the small fires in WTC 7. No one had been in that building since 11 am. No fire official ever goes to the guy leasing a building from the Port Authority to ask his advice on how to fight fires or where he should place his men.
Anyone who thinks this video doesn't show the use of explosives in that tower doesn't have enough understanding of the structure to comment. But thanks for the video.
3theThird 4 years ago
"Pull it" is a firefighter term which means to PULL OUT of there. You want to argue with a firefighter about this? If you do, you're in for a serious wake up call.
CivilWar1863 4 years ago
Oh hey there civilwar1863. Today your a firefighter huh? Last week it was a commercial pilot. Before that it was an engineer. Your really an expert in a lot of fields.
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
just b4 the tower collapses there is something that blows out of a window at bottom of screen....my thought is a controlled demolition!!!!
crosslandleeds69 4 years ago
My thought, since I'm a firefighter and I know damn well WTF I'm talking about, is COMPRESSED AIR. Think I'm wrong? Go to DEBUNKING911 dot COM it'll show you scientific proof instead of just looking with your eyes. Read, read and read some more before you come to any theory.
CivilWar1863 4 years ago
why would compressed air be coming out of wtc7 BEFORE the building collapses?
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
No, it doesn't come out BEFORE. Looks like wishful thinking on your part. No demo experts say those are squibs. Even Jowenko specifically says they're not.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
If people are unemployed, they make up a conspiracy theory that's insane and the "truth", never mind that it makes no sense. This will give them attention, and if they get lucky, they'll get payed to write a book about their theory, making them some money to pay their electric bills.
CivilWar1863 4 years ago
Are you a member of the bomb squad? Are you a demolitions expert? Do you know what hazardous compounds that were in the WTC and Pentagon? Does jet fuel contain sulfur? What is the melting point of aluminum?
CivilWar1863 4 years ago
Do you know what temp steel melts at? do you know what thermite and thermate are. Do you know what moltent steel in the base of wtc 1&2 means. How about what buildings falling at free fall speed means. Or colums being sheered and perfect 45deg angles? one thing you dont know is how to debate legitimate points
fattypepper 4 years ago
This guy claims to be a lot of things. Firefighter, demolitions expert, commercial airline pilot. Civilwar1863, your a pathological liar!
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
"No demolition expert in the world agrees it was a controlled demolition." Thank you PoetryHound! I don't know what the hell people see "squibs" for? Don't they know that there's air pressure inside the buildings as they were coming down? There waa so much AIR PRESSURE THAT THE WINDOWS BLEW OUT!
CivilWar1863 5 years ago
You are wrong. plain and simple how can you make statements like that when they are just false? Many demolition experts have said that wtc 1&2 had to be controlled and wtc 7 was without doubt.
fattypepper 4 years ago
Then where did the planes go and crew? Where are they 2day? What is your PHD in explosives, metalurgics? How many national security meetings have you been to? Are you member of the local fire dept? Do you have certificates from FEMA? Are you a building architect? Are you an iron worker? Do you know what a fire triangle is? Do you know what aluminum oxide is?
CivilWar1863 4 years ago
fucking ıraqs. they are trying to win USA with their ugly face and ass.
sonerin 5 years ago
my brother was 2 blocosk away from it going to college. luckily he's alive and moved faar away to hawaii to go to college there.
gsegs 5 years ago
Conspiracy therorist are idiots, plain and simple. Clearly you guys ain't no building architects nor do you see what's happening. The WTC were basically hollowed out building. You've got an outter wall and an inner core with no supports holding the floors up in between them. I'll go look up some facts to disprove your claims.
CivilWar1863 5 years ago
Nice try! we all saw the nova special you are parroting trying to pretend you actually know somthing. Even in their computer animation the center collums stayed standing. the building desing was to support two jet crashesh and stay standing. you people are so ignorant it makes me sick
fattypepper 4 years ago
I guess this video does explain the squibs and the random floors closures in the WTC, weeks b4 9/11 for building "inspections" and why the bomb sniffing dogs were pulled out of the builiding after these "inspections". It also justifies why bush isnt doing shit all in afganistan and why hes stealing oil from the iraqies. Just face it buddy the US governement killed thousands of innocent plp just to get what they wanted. Oh ya are u like the only guy who actually voted for bush.
gingerdrivebum 5 years ago
Yeah good point. The camera pointed seconds before someone pulled it down. Buildings down fall ontheir footprints so prestine and faster then gravitational pull, by accident. That's a masterpiece of A+ planning for weeks/months.
jez135 5 years ago
No demolition expert in the world agrees it was a controlled demolition.
PoetryHound 5 years ago
You non "conspiracy" morons need to put down your beer turn off the football game and actually look into things before you post comments letting the rest of the world know how lazy and ignorant you are
fattypepper 4 years ago
In other words, fattypepper, you are unable to name a single demo expert who says the twin towers were brought down in controlled demolitions.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
Danny jowenko jowenko expslosive demolitions inc, Van romero former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center , or how about the fact that Larry Silverstein the owner of the buildings admitted on pbs he had them "pull" building seven. the word "Pull" means blow up in demolition terms. If you looked into it you would find hundreds of experts in many fields believe the same to be true. But im sure you know more then they do
fattypepper 4 years ago
You're wtong. Danny Jowenko specifically said he did NOT believe the twin towers came down in controlled demolitions. How come you didn't know that? How come you didn't know that Romero does NOT think the towers came down in controlled demolitions? I repeat: There is not a single demo expert that says the twin towers came down in controlled demolitions. Not one.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
why do you have such a hard on for this? why are you on youtube watching the towers fall anyway? people look into this yourselves poetryhound and civilwar just make stuff up you can probably watch the jowenko video on here were he says catagoricaly wtc7 was a controlled domolition look it up
fattypepper 4 years ago
In order to believe WTFC 7 was a controlled demo, you have to ignore the fact that Jowenko wasn't told pertinent information, you have to ignore the fact that "pull" doesn't mean explosive demo, you have to ignore the fact that no demo charges were seen or heard, & ignore all the FDNY statements talking about how concerned they were that WTC 7 would collapse. YOu have to ignore real evidence & believe bullshit.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
And what real evidence are you privy to that the rest of us aren't scholars for 9/11 truth who are PhDs, Lawyers, professors, have unlike you carefully sifted through the evidence and do not believe what you're saying
fattypepper 4 years ago
Significantly, the 9/11 "scholars" are mainly theologians, history professors, and the like. There are no structural engineers with highrise construction experience, no metallurgists, no seismologists, no forensic engineers, no fire engineers - in short, no one with expertise or experience in the pertinent subject areas. There is no evidence of any explosives at WTC 7. None.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
Is it bs that the buildings all fell at near freefall speed(wich is impossible without controled demo) is it bs that no other steel structures in history has been felled from fire is it bs that the firefighters were told the buildings were coming down by guilianis team(why don't nyc cops and firefighters like him anymore?)Is it bs that jet fule burns at 1800deg but steel doesnt even start to weeken till 3000deg.There is a thousand times more evidence against the official story then for it.
fattypepper 4 years ago
w w w. 911research . wtc7 . net you can find an analysis of your Brent Blanchard review here since you brought it up. You have lost this debate give up and face reality I know its scary buddy but you gotta be able to see the forrest for the trees
fattypepper 4 years ago
Well, of course YOU say I've lost this debate. But that's just your opinion. And that's typical of conspiracy theorists - always substituting opinion for fact. Nothing but unsubstantiated assertions, misinterpretations, false information, and questions. But no evidence of any government plot & no evidence of explosives use.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
BTW, Jim Hoffman is not demolition expert. Interestingly, he says absolutely nothing in response to the quote I used below - that "pull it" refers not to the use of explosives, but to pulling a structure over with cables. So much for "pull it" meaning "blow up." You can still claim whatever you want, but there's no substantiation for it.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
You are the one making claims that are just flat out lies.the buildings didn't fall at near freefall? where is your eveidence of the official story? where? other then you believe what they tell you to believe. You get all your info from the same debunking website. Almost everyone who understands the way the world actually works doesn't believe what your saying YOU HAVE NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE TO BACK YOURSELF UP
fattypepper 4 years ago
Who says WTC 7 fell at freefall speed? Near freefall is more like it. The freefall claim is certainly not based on the seismic record. Columbia Univ's Palisades Station recorded the ground impact at 18 seconds, suggesting that the South part of the building fell first. You can't tell that from the North side videos although you can see the East penthouse fall first. Also, in the rubble pile, the North side of the building shrouded the rest of debris, likewise suggesting it fell second.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
The definition in the dictionary of to "pull" or to "pull down" means to demolish. How is it possible that all three buildings fell into there own footprint without the mathmatical calculations needed. If it was possible demo experts would brig down building with fire as opposed to explosives. What you suggest just isn't rationaly possible. Thermite was found on the colums. Thats not debatable
fattypepper 4 years ago
You've already seen that in demolition circles, "pull" refers not to explosive demo but to pulling down with cables. Even Jim Hoffman does not dispute that. So there's no longer any basis for defining "pull" as "blow up." How can you claim the 3 bldgs fell in their footprints when they damaged buildings around them? No thermite was was found on any columns and that's a fact that even Steven Jones would not dispute. You seem to be misinformed on nearly everything.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
No you seem to want to blatantly lie about the fact its silly .prisonplanet. com / articles / march2007 / 180307WTC7 .htm "pull" means to demolomish. you are either in severe denail or just into lieing because you're completely wrong on everything and it has to be on purpose because you are aware of all the names involvled where did dr jones find the thermite then?
fattypepper 4 years ago
As you may know, "pull" has many meanings. As has already been explained to you, the demolition industry uses "pull" to refer to demolish with cables, not with explosives. Even the guy you cite, Jim Hoffman, does not dispute this. Is the person at prisonplanet a demolition expert? Apparently not. Find a demo expert who agrees that "pull" refers to explosives and then rational people may agree with you. Until then, you're simply wrong about the definition.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
Prof. Steven Jones, who conducted his PhD research at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility, has analyised materials from WTC and has detected the existence of thermate, used for "cutting" the steel support columns, as evident in the photo below.
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
Former BYU professor Steven Jones, who originated the thermite theory, said he found "thermate traces," but the thermate markers he identified, most prominently sulfur, are also markers for other common things in the buildings, chiefly gypsum from the wallboard that was common in office partitions. Jones' has not been able to get scientific corroboration for his findings. Basically, the only people who agree with him are non-scientists.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
dude by the way there made from metal.
artjugler 4 years ago
911research. wtc7. net/wtc/analysis/collapses/freefall
fattypepper 4 years ago
Ok poetryhound you said pull doesn't mean demolish, the dictionary says it does! You said jowenko never said it was a demolition then you said he did, but he was wrong, you said steven jones didn't find thermite when he did.You said steel could melt at 1800deg when 2750deg is more like it you either contradict everything you say or you just lie
fattypepper 4 years ago
Who says WTC 7 fell at freefall speed? Not the seismic record, just people who read it who are not seismologists. You're right that it's BS that the firefighters were told by Guiliani that WTC 7 was coming down. It was the FDNY that made the determination & told everyone else. You've got the steel weakening temp wrong. So far, the only thing that's really BS is the crap you claim is evidence. There is no evidence explosives were used at WTC 7.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
He says wtc7 is definately a controlled demolition (Jowenko). Your just a pathetic fucking lying sack of shit. Ha ha! No more bill of rights PoetryHOund. Martial law for you is right around the corner. Papers please!
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
The interviewer didn't tell Jowenko the building got hit by WTC1, that it had major fires raging in it (according to FDNY), that in footage with sound there is no sign of detonation charges, or that the collapse was expected by FDNY & other experts on the scene. So he didn't have all the info that would have been useful to make a judgment. Perhaps if you stopped foaming at the mouth you'd be able to think more clearly.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
"We have never, ever heard the term 'pull it' being used to refer to the explosive demo of a bldg, & neither has any blast team we've spoken with. The term is used in conventional demolition circles to describe the specific activity of attaching long cables to a pre-weakened bldg & maneuvering heavy equipment to 'pull' the frame of the structure over onto its side for further dismantlement." Brent Blanchard, Senior Editor, Implosion World, & Director of Field Operations, Protec
PoetryHound 4 years ago
Everyone on the ground lived, and the explosions happened a good 10 - 5 seconds before it fell, not when it fell.
ShUgO255 5 years ago
Open your ears I can hear sounds like explosions clearly.
wwwPeymanOrg 5 years ago
fuck all of you.watch this video.its spoken in english but spanish subtitles.watch it.CIA planned sep 11 to go to irak and take out petroluom.
the video is:
Loose change 2nd Edition [Spanish - Español] 5/9 by Gonichi. watch it and contienue watching the series of the investigation.plz
ANGELjimenezPASCUA 5 years ago
Compressed air has enormous energy. Being such a large area falling down the air flowing down the core/elevator shafts at high velocity would easly find the weakest exits and vent causing the dust clouds that the conspiracy theorists seem to think are explosions. The structure failed due to thousands of tons of impact force from plane not from explosives. God bless the innocent every day people who died and they're familys and friends....
jonyknoxvil 5 years ago
You can't call people like Paul Craig Roberts. Robert Bowman, Webster Tarpley. Andreas von Bulow, Kevin Ryan and Ray McGovern 'morons'.
Think before you repeat parrot-fashion what the govt. wants you to think.
andrewlowewatson 5 years ago
To bring down WTC 7 in front of the worlds media would be audacious enough but to bring down the entire WTC site including the towers, plus blow up a large portion of the Pentagon as well as pointlessly crashing an aircraft in the middle of a field is logistically impossible. Why do we continue to notice patterns in things that aren't there ?
uSERiNdESPAIR 5 years ago
It may be impossible but it happened. Why replace reality with what we think ought to happen?
andrewlowewatson 5 years ago
78 floors fell in about ten seconds. Think about it. That's less than a second per floor. That's faster than gravity. Impossible!!! Where's the resistance from the floors below. Were these floors made of syrofoam???
muzicmaker2001 5 years ago
....there is definitely a squib half way down the building....
shabirlondon 5 years ago
pwople supporting the conspiracy theory are morons why wouldnt a structure weaken if its hit by a huge aircraft at the speed of 950 kms per hour
shaun186ohio 5 years ago
Such a huge building NEVER falls STRAIGHT DOWN!
And -before you talk- look at the evidences-
There were another SMALLER buildings, burning LONGER and they did not collapse.
The most of you were tricked by media manipulation by the american government... and bush, the real terrorist.
think about it.
JLFP 5 years ago
Such a huge building DID fall STRAIGHT DOWN!
The conspiracists are unable to see anything but the conspiracy.
arkamel 5 years ago
They shouldn't fall straight down? Why not?
PoetryHound 5 years ago
People who think there was controlled demolition are naive and self-deluded knobs who know nothing about basic physics.
Backfire757 5 years ago
Look at the top floors of the north tower when it was hit, air exploded downward and upward. Air travelled so rapidly it blew a restroom apart in Windows. One person trapped up there thought a bomb had gone off in there. I have yet to see any of these conspiracy idiots mention that.
homeric9 5 years ago
ok people there was no bomb planted before and the puffs of smoke at the bottem as some of u say "is the bomb going off" is really when the tower started to fall air was being pushed down but the ruble causeing dust and other stuff out of the bottem. but sad vid...
pinoypride5491 5 years ago
poor dude...terrific..
legolas84 5 years ago
very nice video. new to me
Nailon 5 years ago
not controlled demo. Watch any video of cont. demo and u will hear a LOT of rapid explosions right before the building collapses. This does NOT happen here. Also, the top part of the building tilts slightly, THEN collapses - so again, NOT a controlled demo. The puffs are compressed air forcing out debris. Also, 3 or 4 puffs?! that;s REALLY gonna bring a 110 story building down :|
Norbeone 5 years ago
Dont you think for a tower falling down it would have been louder in reality? This was certainly recorded on a shitty camera, certainly not a broadcast standard camera.
stefan171 5 years ago
Anything being emitted out from the bottom of the tower most likely came from the elevators shafts; these would have acted as 'tunnels' through which the dust would have been expelled as the building fell in on itself. As has been said before, there are no sounds of explosions on this footage (you can hear just about everything else though) and it was a pretty powerful and unprecedented event to have happened.
riksta01 5 years ago
yeah if u watch the tower when it falls. u can see clouds of smoke puff out of windows on the floors near the bottom
clerksll 5 years ago
yeah, I see now. Once again sorry about my comment!
PnP88 5 years ago
hmm
DashBremen 5 years ago
Sorry about my comment. I read that in a newspaper.
PnP88 5 years ago
No you are right. There were no bombs. I see on the video.
PnP88 5 years ago
What the fuck are you talking about? The bombs were planted before the aircrafts hit the buildings!!
PnP88 5 years ago
This was shot damned close to ground zero...No wonder the cameraman chickened out after a few seconds of filming the collapse, to try to get the f*ck out of there!
Bobb9999 5 years ago
It's a 110 story building collapsing with one floor smashing into the one below it? What the fuck do you expect, total silence?
ArmyHighlander 5 years ago
Floors collapsing on themselves is a pretty powerful event, hence the loud noises.
EmmSeeMusic 5 years ago
This really comes down to a matter of who you want to believe. Either you think the government is lying to you or they're telling the truth. Similar case as Kennedy's assassination. Was it Oswald or some guy on the grassy knoll? I tend to think the government is lying and there's a lot they're not telling us. Who knows? I'm sure nobody here does.
Nermol 5 years ago
I definitely saw little puffs of smoke coming out of the building. personally i think they're explosions bringing it down in a controlled fasion. i doubt the plane was what made it fall.
Nermol 5 years ago
Gosh, the gases you see come from the lower sides the of the building is mearly air rushing out of the building due to the huge pressure of the upper stories collapsing!!! Not explosions you poor minded thinkers!!!
JZZ31 5 years ago
there was a frickin engineer involved with 9/11, so there probably were men of middle eastern decent probably dressing up to look like maintenance workers inside the wtc buildings who knew exactly where the hijackers could hit the towers to make it look like a controlled demolition. There was even a witness who saw the workers like the last weekend before that Tuesday or something.
MPGuY2006 5 years ago
Sim if you think the government "wanted" the buildings to fall you are mistaken if not a crack head.
Explosions ? Jaysus people get fucking real. Billlions of tons of material pancacking down on frame work that has windows. Do you recall the sound of your fat ass sitting on your couch pillow ?
Stupid twats
nilsins 5 years ago
*sigh*
The smoke puffing out of the tower is the air rushing out of the building.
Superstring 5 years ago
My mistake..
Not movie, I meant video..
Misteraran 5 years ago
soulismissing is right!
You'll hear a explosion around 3-4 seconds in the movie.
Also while hearing the small explosion, you'll also see a white puff.
I still don't know if that's a bomb or trapped air though..
Misteraran 5 years ago
listen with headphones on....right b4 it falls anfd all the way down you can hear a low explosion over and over again...you have to listen very close.
soulismissing 5 years ago
yea I saw the white puff come out there is definetly explosives in the tower
SimiV15 5 years ago
same here
bigchano 5 years ago
there owuldnt be a puf fof smoke near the bottom like that unless it was caused by something blowing up near the bottom. if it was AIR then there would be tons of windows blowing out near the top way before the bottom was
steve23guy 5 years ago
Watch at about 3-4 seconds into it, near the bottom left of the building, ull see a puff, then a few seconds after near the top of the collapse ull see a couple more,
steve23guy 5 years ago
I kinda belived the govermant wanted to take the towers down (thats my opinion I saw loose change and well you know the rest) and blame other countrys just to make new enemies.
SimiV15 5 years ago
WTF i just saw a explosion go off fire could not make the WTC fall only a bomb could
stiffler773 5 years ago
prison planet dot com has the articles you can do a search there...oh and i have no fixed opinion one way or another yet..the jurys still out...but its deliberating hard
Getemall 5 years ago
fact is bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the wtc the day before the attacks... oh and george bushs BROTHER and COUSIN were heads of the company that provided security for the towers Can you blame people for being suspcious? bush really cant push a broom ur right. but he can be pushed to do a lot of things by others. just look at iraq...you never know
Getemall 5 years ago
lol @ russinhesperia. ur missing the premise these guys put forth. if they just used explosives they would have to explain how "terrorists" got enough explosives (which is a LOT) in the wtc to bring it down without noone knowing. the planes were the plausible attack and the explosives were - in their opinion - the assistance needed to bring the buildings down, which would be such a dramatic image the ppl would rally behind the government.
Getemall 5 years ago
the ONLY time a building EVER collapsed were the WTC towers and building 7 all in ONE DAY! Coincidence right?Oh and by the way STEEL BENDS!it DOESNT turn into dust like in the video. If the planes DID melt the steel why does the WHOLE BUILDING DISINTEGRATE?
xtrameaty 5 years ago
NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF SKYSCRAPERS, has one fallen due to fire OR a plane hitting it.The EMPIRESTATE building was hit by a plane and all it had was millions of dollars worth of damage and burnt LONGER than the WTC towers.
xtrameaty 5 years ago
no explosives just planes, think about it idiots, if they had explosives they wouldnt have needed the planes, you fucking imbiciles, 'oh yea bush did it' u fucking clowns, bush didnt do it, how could a guy that can barely manage a broom closet convince people to become kamakazi pilots. ur just a bunch of whining turd sniffers.
russinhesperia 5 years ago
this documentory clearly shows explosive's and many other mysterious things going on at the wtc - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=9%2F11+eyewitness
dijit345 5 years ago
there were explosions, thermite and sulfer was used - i have countless videos of reporter's, firemen, eyewitnesses saying there were explosions, and it was all done in building #7 (that was not hit by a plane) where they "pulled" (destroyed the building) to hide the evidence of thier invovlement.
dijit345 5 years ago
impresionante
xtrapeque 5 years ago
i mean 7 or 8 seconds
EVERTH90 5 years ago
wow u fuking nerds were u even get all dis info
and yes ther was an explosion u faggots hot could u not see it stop da video at 18 or 19 seconds ull see dust commint out from the building
EVERTH90 5 years ago
It's called air compression, dimwit.
Jel1790 5 years ago
I have video taken inside Tower 1 - the north tower - that shows all the glass blown out on the lobby level before the towers fell. This was from the impact of the planes, forcing air and fuel down the elevator shafts at such force it blasted the ground-floor windows out. No explosion other than the planes themselves.
hogarth2006 5 years ago
wheres the video then
daanesh7 5 years ago
There is NOTHING I can see in any of the videos that would indicate controlled demolition makes more sense than what actually happened. You tinfoil hat guys are simply wrong, and I wish you would find some other "conspiracy" to wet yourselves over.
hogarth2006 5 years ago
You guys who say it wasn't just fire that brought down the towers are right in one sense: it was fire PLUS the fact of being hit by two airliners going full speed into the towers. The collapses began at the point of most damage from the aircraft, where the buildings were weakest.
hogarth2006 5 years ago
there were if u ever watch a documentary of the collapse there are fireman saying that before they got out of the 1st WTC before the plane hit walls were already startin to collapse and no one mentioned any thing cuz everyon thought it was vibrations from the airplane besides our government is behind the terror attack thats wh i cant wait to move outta here and move to madagascar off of africa
xtremefrogsplash 5 years ago