The US government has successfully brainwashed it's citizens depicting Muslims as the terrorists who brought down the Twin Towers and has cast dispersions on their religion. The truth is close at hand.
@whole2th That is an amazing web site with a lot of hard evidence. When America gets wise to the Jewish role in 9/11, there will be hell to pay. Unfortunately, it will upset a lot of Americans who will have their world view turned upside down. They're going to be like, "What do you mean? Everything I believed was a lie?"
What freaks me out, is this male anchor actually starts talking, at 5:48, about how "there were very few people in the Salomon building when it collapsed." & yet, there it is, still standing, and he has his whole "report" already prepared and is feeding it to the public. I mean, To go that far, and start reporting whether people were injured or not, flips me out!! & the building is still standing!!!
The reason why you still see the building is because the reporters are standing in front of a blue screen with a DELAYED picture. Delayed by several minutes. Do your research before making a bullshit video.
its been proven that after a while the fire fueled by the jet fuel was hot enough to soften the steel. and they say it was the first free standing steel structure to fall from fires. they forgot to mention that it is probaly the only tower structure to get hit by a giant airplane.
@paulinotou . You mean besides the 10 ton B-25 that hit the empire state building. You morons should do some research before making idiotic statements. There is so much evidence that the real story is way incomplete.
Also do you believe a time lapse camera on the pentagon is the only videotape on the heaviest guarded building in the USA. Get a clue or just keep your head buried in the sand.
There are two towers my love. One had already collapsed, one was still standing. And the whole timezone thing is differant for the bbc. It would have been early hours in the morning when it happened, we dont use EST.
1. Collapsing is a process that can take a while to build up, only seconds to happen.
2. Firefighters/cops/etc saw it was going to collapse probably much earlier in the afternoon, reporters overheard it and reported it. Then it actually happened.
Puppyshunter... what you fail to understand - the reporting in europe was very different than here in the states. As we watched the towers go down.. europe was reporting a suspected connection with america's involvement with the mujahedeen - and Osama bin laden! Over there they are more objective about our history.. and our political connections. It may not be easy for you to accept.. or confront - but our government has done far worse in the past.. it's not surprising.
This was a unique set of circumstances which no architect or structural engineer could have considered. There are TOO MANY VARIABLES.
Conspiracy theorists like to make the world EASY TO UNDERSTAND, so WTC7 was a demolition job COVERED-UP BY THE INDUSTRIAL-MILITARY COMPLEX/THE ZIONIST CONSPIRACY/THE HOODED LIZARD PEOPLE and their friends at CNN/FOX/BBC [delete where appropriate]. And if you don't believe it YOU'RE BRAINWASHED.
Sorry guys, the world's not that simple. Sometimes you have to work.
@puppyshunter I'm glad that I'm not the only person with common sence :) I have spent over a year studying conspiricies and 99.9% of them are complete rubbish. I wouldn't be supprised if allot of these conspricy leaders like Alex Jones get paid for keeping eyes off more mundane things like the latest millitary plane, tank or places like RAF Menwith Hill which is the largest spy base in the world yet isn't widely known outside of Yorkshire England.
WTC 7 was a very unusual collapse falling at free-fall speed as if all steel columns were sliced at once. And how did the other towers fall in that same unusual manner. And why don't we see a clear perfect camera shot of the plane that hit the Pentagon? Way too many unusual things all happened on that day.If you think it would have gotten out by someone by now that was in on it..you don't know what real power can do obviously. Power works without us knowing, and it silences the majority always
BBC was most likely reporting what CNN was reporting which was the building "MAY" collapse but because of the panic in reporting a disaster of that magnitude confusion was abound. Even the reporter who was obviously a good distance from the site said that information was "sketchy". "May collapse" and "has collapsed" could easily be confused or dropped in reporting.
Yeah but it's still funny that they cut just before the building was going to collapse right behind the female BBC reporter all the while talking about how it already collapsed.
that has to be the most sketchy argumant regarding the bbc possible. how is life in the cia...hows the international drug industry doing,well no doubt.
"Definately not forknowledge. The BBC are just reporting what they are told/what they hear." - A five year old can tell time and that is definitely WAS FOREKNOWLEDGE. It was known BEFORE IT HAPPENED. But you are right, they WERE just "reporting" what they were told/what they hear. And either this "source" was unbelievably psychic, or he/she screwed up the timing.
FAIL. Why is there a black bar covering the bit where the BBC posts the GMT time constantly and the only references to the time are added by the poster. As for the skyline, I'll admit I don't know (are you familiar with the feeling of not knowing everything?), but at 5:28 she does refer to it as "an empty piece". If you're going to have a credible theory it has to stand up to scrutiny, not just have other people (however few or many) agreeing with you.
This is coverage from BBC World which doesn't display a clock on-screen. BBC News 24 does, since it's only broadcast in the UK where the time is the same nationwide.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Guys come on...on that day,there was so many rumors that misinfomation was reported...they didnt know wat was true and wat wasnt...OUR GOVERNMENT HAD Nothing TO DO WITH 9/11!!!!!!!!!
Try to find a controlled demolition video in which the building falls as smoothly and as straight down as WTC7 did. According to NIST, the east and west ends of the main roof fell within a half second of each other (the penthouses fell several seconds earlier). In most CD collapse videos, we see one part falling a few seconds before the rest. WTC7 was a superb controlled demolition or else it looks that way just by chance due to fire and debris damage.
look at this video, they should have used the same teams that brought down the WTC7
"falling debris from the twin towers had left not insubstantial impact damage"
A powerful explosion at the base of WTC7 demolished part of the stairway and trapped Barry Jennings and Michael Hess in WTC7 BEFORE any twin towers had collapsed or debris. Base explosions also occured seconds before plane crashed into twin towers according to Rodriguez and other witnesses
regardless of any arguments that you may come up with that it is not WTC7, which is a pathetic argument, considering they name it as Salomon Brothers building(as Salomon brothers based in WTC7), and CNN as WTC7. They say on BBC that it HAS COLLAPSED. on CNN they say it is collapsing or is about to collapse. the same building. fire cannot melt a whole building's steel structure. Giuliani got rid of several tonnes of evidence and melted it down after attacks.
I can't. For one, it hasn't ever happened, at least not with someone around filming it. Secondly, you obviously haven't read the NIST report like you should have or you would have read that there was more than just fire acting on the building's structure, as falling debris from the twin towers had left not insubstantial impact damage. So, it wasn't a simple office fire that brought it down.
No building has ever collapsed due to fire. Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management put out a press release to BBC and CNN that building 7 was going to collapse at such and such a time. Whatever the government tells them they report. The question is not why the media reports whatever the bosses tell them - this is expected - the question is how Giuliani knew it was going to collapse; what is he, clairvoyant? Why should I get over that flashharry101?
It's not a very difficult concept to grasp, the entire building was on fire, as its steel skeleton heated, it became weaker and weaker until it could not support the building. This is a well known property of steel and with the building engulfed in uncontrollable flames, that it would collapse was not a difficult guess to make
lol.....what do u mean the entire building was on fire. You can't see any flames engulfing the building. go check out other steel structure buildings which have been on fire and then you will see. It will all become clear. I love it how everyone becomes physics experts, trying to defend this. You don't need to be a physics expert if you compare it to other steel structure buildings on fire.
Several floors had been on fire throughout the day. Due to the unique construction of the building (built over a substation) and damage inflicted by the debris from the twin towers, the building experienced a progressive collapse. As one section of the building fell, it took others with it. This wasn't anything close to a standard high rise fire.
"several floors had been on fire throughout the day." - and the difference between this and the other building fires is? All i'm saying is that these must have been the worst constructed buildings ever if you believe the official reports. oh wait... the 9/11 commission report left out WTC7. so we don't really know about this one.
The 9/11 commisson may have ignored WTC7 (in the scheme of things it wasn't all that significant anyway). However, the National Institute of Standards and Technology didn't. And they, being engineers, know a lot more about how buildings are supposed to behave than you or I. Their conclusion was that no foul play was involved in the collapse beyond the acts of the hijackers. You don't have to take my word for it though, you can find their report online in pdf format.
Ok i understand i'll give it a read. However if indeed there was foreknowledge, and it was inside job, this would suggest a level of corruption totally unknown to the general public. Therefore it could easily be that the information that has been released 'officially', has also been set up. Trust me if they could fool so many people on that day then they could easily make a few reports to help them!
Or, maybe, there wasn't foreknowledge and a news network chronology error occuring at a time of great hysteria and confusion (mass terror attacks usually seem to induce this state) don't indicate ANYTHING. Do we have confirmation that the building outlined as still standing in the background shots even IS WTC7?
This doesn't prove a conspiracy it merely highlights the banality of rolling news. They want you to keep watching so any new info they get, they use. The newsrooms will have been in BLIND PANIC all afternoon (it was afternoon here in the UK) and will have doubtless made mistakes. I was watching the BBC's coverage from soon after the first plane hit. And at the time it was being reported as a strike by a "light aircraft". Explain how that fits into the conspiracy.
what re you talking about... this is WTC7... it was impossible for that building to completely collapse like tha from just fire. These buildings were very well made. Go look for other steel structure buildings which burned for hours and hours and hours, and never even came close to collapsing in a way that looks just like a cnontrolled demolition. WAKE UP!
So, where are these NYFD commanders? How did they know what FEMA, NIST, and The 9-11 Commission didn't know? What miracle did they PULL out of the collective asses to correctly predict the freefall-speed collapse of the type of skyscraper never known to collapse into a pulverized cloud of concrete dustdo to anything other than DEMOLITION? I'll 'get over it' when the true criminals are brought to justice.
Hmmmmm.. I do remember the 9-11 commission report stating the collapse of WTC7 was unexpected, and both FEMA and NIST were unable to pinpoint the actual cause of the collapse...
The fire department knew it was going to collapse hours before it did. Notice the CNN Report said WTC7 was on fire and MAY collapse. And the BBC obviously got the same message but got it garbled and thought it had already collapsed. People speculate and jump the gun when there is little information coming in. Remember in Munich they reported that all the hostages had been rescued when in fact they were all dead? Reporters screw up, get over it.
Stick your own head BACK up your arse. What makes more sense, that there was an massive secret conspiracy involving the CIA, FBI, NSA, Secret Service, NYPD, FDNY, FEMA, CNN & the BBC. Or that some pissed off muslims did it. Maybe in your fantasy world reporters never screw up, but in this world they do. Only a few months ago they reported there were 12 survivors from a plane crash in Indonesia, when in reality they hadn't even found the crash site let alone survivors(there were none).
Whatever guys but their is one thing we all know is that, HOMO AMERICANS only know how to FUCK others. Their culture and religion have only 2 main points, DICK & Pussy. Fucking their own daughters,Sucking on inlaws,licking on their own mothers thats all they are trying to tech and IMPOSE on the rest of the world.
And you're really helping your cause by stating that ALL Americans are incest-loving mongrels that wanna kill everyone in the world. I'm American, I preach love and tolerance, and not once have I made out with my mother. You dare insult those of us that preach love? You're ignorant, and assume you know exactly what every American thinks and feels. I hope one day you wake up. Blessings of good fortune to you, my friend and brother.
I wonder how much effort the BBC and CNN have put into understanding their clairvoyance in the reporting of the WTC7 collapse? Have they asked themselves why they knew about the collapse before it even happened?
The US government has successfully brainwashed it's citizens depicting Muslims as the terrorists who brought down the Twin Towers and has cast dispersions on their religion. The truth is close at hand.
TheJohnEAngel 3 weeks ago
ReDiscover911(dot)com
It wasn't muslims
whole2th 3 weeks ago
@whole2th That is an amazing web site with a lot of hard evidence. When America gets wise to the Jewish role in 9/11, there will be hell to pay. Unfortunately, it will upset a lot of Americans who will have their world view turned upside down. They're going to be like, "What do you mean? Everything I believed was a lie?"
beppu 3 weeks ago
..-there is much more behind 9-11 than most people can imagine!
starnberg2413 1 month ago
What freaks me out, is this male anchor actually starts talking, at 5:48, about how "there were very few people in the Salomon building when it collapsed." & yet, there it is, still standing, and he has his whole "report" already prepared and is feeding it to the public. I mean, To go that far, and start reporting whether people were injured or not, flips me out!! & the building is still standing!!!
molitor2005 9 months ago
The reason why you still see the building is because the reporters are standing in front of a blue screen with a DELAYED picture. Delayed by several minutes. Do your research before making a bullshit video.
ssssroryssss2 1 year ago
@ssssroryssss2 Oh yes , that's a first ..funny the Beeb hasn't mentioned that! and you know why ,..,they were duped..again !
klnine 4 weeks ago
for any body that STILL believes this BS, watch the whole of thiss docu /watch?v=DIJ-2WZLnNw
ssssroryssss2 1 year ago
its been proven that after a while the fire fueled by the jet fuel was hot enough to soften the steel. and they say it was the first free standing steel structure to fall from fires. they forgot to mention that it is probaly the only tower structure to get hit by a giant airplane.
paulinotou 1 year ago
@paulinotou . You mean besides the 10 ton B-25 that hit the empire state building. You morons should do some research before making idiotic statements. There is so much evidence that the real story is way incomplete.
Also do you believe a time lapse camera on the pentagon is the only videotape on the heaviest guarded building in the USA. Get a clue or just keep your head buried in the sand.
mr2kuhl 1 year ago
There are two towers my love. One had already collapsed, one was still standing. And the whole timezone thing is differant for the bbc. It would have been early hours in the morning when it happened, we dont use EST.
SpearMinti 1 year ago
1. Collapsing is a process that can take a while to build up, only seconds to happen.
2. Firefighters/cops/etc saw it was going to collapse probably much earlier in the afternoon, reporters overheard it and reported it. Then it actually happened.
psynema 1 year ago
Puppyshunter... what you fail to understand - the reporting in europe was very different than here in the states. As we watched the towers go down.. europe was reporting a suspected connection with america's involvement with the mujahedeen - and Osama bin laden! Over there they are more objective about our history.. and our political connections. It may not be easy for you to accept.. or confront - but our government has done far worse in the past.. it's not surprising.
xnothingbutthetruth 2 years ago
That isn't WTC7 lol.
BeyondLame 2 years ago
This was a unique set of circumstances which no architect or structural engineer could have considered. There are TOO MANY VARIABLES.
Conspiracy theorists like to make the world EASY TO UNDERSTAND, so WTC7 was a demolition job COVERED-UP BY THE INDUSTRIAL-MILITARY COMPLEX/THE ZIONIST CONSPIRACY/THE HOODED LIZARD PEOPLE and their friends at CNN/FOX/BBC [delete where appropriate]. And if you don't believe it YOU'RE BRAINWASHED.
Sorry guys, the world's not that simple. Sometimes you have to work.
puppyshunter 3 years ago
@puppyshunter I'm glad that I'm not the only person with common sence :) I have spent over a year studying conspiricies and 99.9% of them are complete rubbish. I wouldn't be supprised if allot of these conspricy leaders like Alex Jones get paid for keeping eyes off more mundane things like the latest millitary plane, tank or places like RAF Menwith Hill which is the largest spy base in the world yet isn't widely known outside of Yorkshire England.
ssssroryssss2 1 year ago
@ssssroryssss2 Hope you watching the FEMA camp "conspiracy" being exposed as truth , "Li'l puppy dog " !
klnine 4 weeks ago
BBC can never again be trusted
Joeey 3 years ago 7
WTC 7 was a very unusual collapse falling at free-fall speed as if all steel columns were sliced at once. And how did the other towers fall in that same unusual manner. And why don't we see a clear perfect camera shot of the plane that hit the Pentagon? Way too many unusual things all happened on that day.If you think it would have gotten out by someone by now that was in on it..you don't know what real power can do obviously. Power works without us knowing, and it silences the majority always
LightsOutNukeWinter 3 years ago
controlled demolition x3
Joeey 3 years ago
he is already implying fire may bring it down! the hidden hand has done a great job of brainwashing the public
bigmoney714 3 years ago
BBC was most likely reporting what CNN was reporting which was the building "MAY" collapse but because of the panic in reporting a disaster of that magnitude confusion was abound. Even the reporter who was obviously a good distance from the site said that information was "sketchy". "May collapse" and "has collapsed" could easily be confused or dropped in reporting.
Grabbing my tinfoil hat.....
Retsnomi 3 years ago
Yeah but it's still funny that they cut just before the building was going to collapse right behind the female BBC reporter all the while talking about how it already collapsed.
chjoezen 3 years ago
that has to be the most sketchy argumant regarding the bbc possible. how is life in the cia...hows the international drug industry doing,well no doubt.
hopaloop 2 years ago
Right because on 9-11 everyone was SOOOOOOOOOO clear.
mazrimtaim10 3 years ago
"Definately not forknowledge. The BBC are just reporting what they are told/what they hear." - A five year old can tell time and that is definitely WAS FOREKNOWLEDGE. It was known BEFORE IT HAPPENED. But you are right, they WERE just "reporting" what they were told/what they hear. And either this "source" was unbelievably psychic, or he/she screwed up the timing.
keyofdavid88 3 years ago
Definately not forknowledge. The BBC are just reporting what they are told/what they hear.
mattmorelli 3 years ago
Propaganda repeater. Echo chamber. No ethics. BBC has cancelled their integrity.
Joeey 3 years ago
Did it REALLY collapse at all??
billhicks69 4 years ago
FAIL. Why is there a black bar covering the bit where the BBC posts the GMT time constantly and the only references to the time are added by the poster. As for the skyline, I'll admit I don't know (are you familiar with the feeling of not knowing everything?), but at 5:28 she does refer to it as "an empty piece". If you're going to have a credible theory it has to stand up to scrutiny, not just have other people (however few or many) agreeing with you.
Adulterish 4 years ago
For your information, Adulterish, the BBC has admitted that the video is genuine. You fail.
GerryMATW 4 years ago 6
This is coverage from BBC World which doesn't display a clock on-screen. BBC News 24 does, since it's only broadcast in the UK where the time is the same nationwide.
mattmorelli 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Guys come on...on that day,there was so many rumors that misinfomation was reported...they didnt know wat was true and wat wasnt...OUR GOVERNMENT HAD Nothing TO DO WITH 9/11!!!!!!!!!
NEBaseball9 4 years ago
Try to find a controlled demolition video in which the building falls as smoothly and as straight down as WTC7 did. According to NIST, the east and west ends of the main roof fell within a half second of each other (the penthouses fell several seconds earlier). In most CD collapse videos, we see one part falling a few seconds before the rest. WTC7 was a superb controlled demolition or else it looks that way just by chance due to fire and debris damage.
RichardC111165 4 years ago
/watch?v=GlMRD2mj5OQ
look at this video, they should have used the same teams that brought down the WTC7
"falling debris from the twin towers had left not insubstantial impact damage"
A powerful explosion at the base of WTC7 demolished part of the stairway and trapped Barry Jennings and Michael Hess in WTC7 BEFORE any twin towers had collapsed or debris. Base explosions also occured seconds before plane crashed into twin towers according to Rodriguez and other witnesses
Rickdeckard2020 3 years ago
regardless of any arguments that you may come up with that it is not WTC7, which is a pathetic argument, considering they name it as Salomon Brothers building(as Salomon brothers based in WTC7), and CNN as WTC7. They say on BBC that it HAS COLLAPSED. on CNN they say it is collapsing or is about to collapse. the same building. fire cannot melt a whole building's steel structure. Giuliani got rid of several tonnes of evidence and melted it down after attacks.
djedd23 4 years ago
try and find a video of a building collapsing in the same way as WTC7 from just fire.
djedd23 4 years ago
I can't. For one, it hasn't ever happened, at least not with someone around filming it. Secondly, you obviously haven't read the NIST report like you should have or you would have read that there was more than just fire acting on the building's structure, as falling debris from the twin towers had left not insubstantial impact damage. So, it wasn't a simple office fire that brought it down.
AMGrulz 4 years ago
Nice interesting post! But, have you seen what happens if you put diamonds in a blender? Check it out blend.lostfrog 'dot' com
chrystinutzas 5 years ago
No building has ever collapsed due to fire. Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management put out a press release to BBC and CNN that building 7 was going to collapse at such and such a time. Whatever the government tells them they report. The question is not why the media reports whatever the bosses tell them - this is expected - the question is how Giuliani knew it was going to collapse; what is he, clairvoyant? Why should I get over that flashharry101?
dollar12 5 years ago
It's not a very difficult concept to grasp, the entire building was on fire, as its steel skeleton heated, it became weaker and weaker until it could not support the building. This is a well known property of steel and with the building engulfed in uncontrollable flames, that it would collapse was not a difficult guess to make
AMGrulz 4 years ago
lol.....what do u mean the entire building was on fire. You can't see any flames engulfing the building. go check out other steel structure buildings which have been on fire and then you will see. It will all become clear. I love it how everyone becomes physics experts, trying to defend this. You don't need to be a physics expert if you compare it to other steel structure buildings on fire.
djedd23 4 years ago
Several floors had been on fire throughout the day. Due to the unique construction of the building (built over a substation) and damage inflicted by the debris from the twin towers, the building experienced a progressive collapse. As one section of the building fell, it took others with it. This wasn't anything close to a standard high rise fire.
AMGrulz 4 years ago
"several floors had been on fire throughout the day." - and the difference between this and the other building fires is? All i'm saying is that these must have been the worst constructed buildings ever if you believe the official reports. oh wait... the 9/11 commission report left out WTC7. so we don't really know about this one.
djedd23 4 years ago
The 9/11 commisson may have ignored WTC7 (in the scheme of things it wasn't all that significant anyway). However, the National Institute of Standards and Technology didn't. And they, being engineers, know a lot more about how buildings are supposed to behave than you or I. Their conclusion was that no foul play was involved in the collapse beyond the acts of the hijackers. You don't have to take my word for it though, you can find their report online in pdf format.
AMGrulz 4 years ago
Ok i understand i'll give it a read. However if indeed there was foreknowledge, and it was inside job, this would suggest a level of corruption totally unknown to the general public. Therefore it could easily be that the information that has been released 'officially', has also been set up. Trust me if they could fool so many people on that day then they could easily make a few reports to help them!
djedd23 4 years ago
Or, maybe, there wasn't foreknowledge and a news network chronology error occuring at a time of great hysteria and confusion (mass terror attacks usually seem to induce this state) don't indicate ANYTHING. Do we have confirmation that the building outlined as still standing in the background shots even IS WTC7?
AMGrulz 4 years ago
YES of course it is. that has never been debated.
djedd23 4 years ago
This doesn't prove a conspiracy it merely highlights the banality of rolling news. They want you to keep watching so any new info they get, they use. The newsrooms will have been in BLIND PANIC all afternoon (it was afternoon here in the UK) and will have doubtless made mistakes. I was watching the BBC's coverage from soon after the first plane hit. And at the time it was being reported as a strike by a "light aircraft". Explain how that fits into the conspiracy.
puppyshunter 5 years ago
what re you talking about... this is WTC7... it was impossible for that building to completely collapse like tha from just fire. These buildings were very well made. Go look for other steel structure buildings which burned for hours and hours and hours, and never even came close to collapsing in a way that looks just like a cnontrolled demolition. WAKE UP!
djedd23 4 years ago
So, where are these NYFD commanders? How did they know what FEMA, NIST, and The 9-11 Commission didn't know? What miracle did they PULL out of the collective asses to correctly predict the freefall-speed collapse of the type of skyscraper never known to collapse into a pulverized cloud of concrete dustdo to anything other than DEMOLITION? I'll 'get over it' when the true criminals are brought to justice.
glowmawr 5 years ago
Hmmmmm.. I do remember the 9-11 commission report stating the collapse of WTC7 was unexpected, and both FEMA and NIST were unable to pinpoint the actual cause of the collapse...
glowmawr 5 years ago
The fire department knew it was going to collapse hours before it did. Notice the CNN Report said WTC7 was on fire and MAY collapse. And the BBC obviously got the same message but got it garbled and thought it had already collapsed. People speculate and jump the gun when there is little information coming in. Remember in Munich they reported that all the hostages had been rescued when in fact they were all dead? Reporters screw up, get over it.
flashharry101 5 years ago
Go stick your head, BACK in the sand.
RunzWithScissorz 5 years ago
Stick your own head BACK up your arse. What makes more sense, that there was an massive secret conspiracy involving the CIA, FBI, NSA, Secret Service, NYPD, FDNY, FEMA, CNN & the BBC. Or that some pissed off muslims did it. Maybe in your fantasy world reporters never screw up, but in this world they do. Only a few months ago they reported there were 12 survivors from a plane crash in Indonesia, when in reality they hadn't even found the crash site let alone survivors(there were none).
flashharry101 5 years ago
You are a fucking idiot... plain and simple.
RunzWithScissorz 5 years ago
Ah good, the typical CT inability to debate rationally.
flashharry101 5 years ago
An inability to put up with and humor ignorance. Really, I have no desire to argue with a moron ;)
RunzWithScissorz 5 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Whatever guys but their is one thing we all know is that, HOMO AMERICANS only know how to FUCK others. Their culture and religion have only 2 main points, DICK & Pussy. Fucking their own daughters,Sucking on inlaws,licking on their own mothers thats all they are trying to tech and IMPOSE on the rest of the world.
pakcop 4 years ago
And you're really helping your cause by stating that ALL Americans are incest-loving mongrels that wanna kill everyone in the world. I'm American, I preach love and tolerance, and not once have I made out with my mother. You dare insult those of us that preach love? You're ignorant, and assume you know exactly what every American thinks and feels. I hope one day you wake up. Blessings of good fortune to you, my friend and brother.
Fallenvirtue 4 years ago
I wonder how much effort the BBC and CNN have put into understanding their clairvoyance in the reporting of the WTC7 collapse? Have they asked themselves why they knew about the collapse before it even happened?
If so, what is the answer?
If not, why not?
skeeveskeeve 5 years ago
Can you say inside job, boys and girls? I thought so.
glowmawr 5 years ago